Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

KAGRA: 2.5 generation interferometric gravitational wave detector


The recent detections of gravitational waves (GWs) reported by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations have made a significant impact on physics and astronomy. A global network of GW detectors will play a key role in uncovering the unknown nature of the sources in coordinated observations with astronomical telescopes and detectors. Here we introduce KAGRA, a new GW detector with two 3 km baseline arms arranged in an ‘L’ shape. KAGRA’s design is similar to the second generations of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, but it will be operating at cryogenic temperatures with sapphire mirrors. This low-temperature feature is advantageous for improving the sensitivity around 100 Hz and is considered to be an important feature for the third-generation GW detector concept (for example, the Einstein Telescope of Europe or the Cosmic Explorer of the United States). Hence, KAGRA is often called a 2.5-generation GW detector based on laser interferometry. KAGRA’s first observation run is scheduled in late 2019, aiming to join the third observation run of the advanced LIGO–Virgo network. When operating along with the existing GW detectors, KAGRA will be helpful in locating GW sources more accurately and determining the source parameters with higher precision, providing information for follow-up observations of GW trigger candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Location of KAGRA.
Fig. 2: Evolution of GW detectors in Japan.
Fig. 3: Observation plans of LIGO, VIRGO and KAGRA.


  1. Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hulse, R. A. & Taylor, J. H. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. Astrophys. J. 195, L51 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, J. H. & Weisberg, J. M. Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar. Astrophys. J. 253, 908 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbott, B. P. et al. GW151226: observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170104: observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170608: observation of a 19 solar-mass binary black hole coalescence. Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L35 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170814: a three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aasi, J. et al. Advanced LIGO. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Acernese, F. et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbott, B. P. et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mizuno, J. et al. Resonant sideband extraction: a new configuration for interferometric gravitational wave detectors. Phys. Lett. A 175, 273 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Somiya, K. Detector configuration of KAGRA—the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector. Class. Quantum Gravity 29, 124007 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawashima, K. Laser Interferometer (TENKO-10 and -100) for Gravitational Wave Antenna Development Report No. 640 (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 1991).

  15. Sato, S. et al. High-gain power recycling of a Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometer for a gravitational-wave antenna. Appl. Opt. 36, 1446 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsubono, K. in Gravitational Wave Experiments (eds Coccia, E., Pizzella, G. & Ronga F.) 112–114 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).

  17. Ando, M. et al. Stable operation of a 300-m laser interferometer with sufficient sensitivity to detect gravitational-wave events within our Galaxy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3950 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato, S. et al. Ultrastable performance of an underground-based laser interferometer observatory for gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D 69, 102005 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ando, M. et al. Analysis methods for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, S1679 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Christensen, N. et al. LIGO S6 detector characterization studies. Class. Quantum Gravity 27, 194010 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Uchiyama, T. et al. Reduction of thermal fluctuations in a cryogenic laser interferometric gravitational wave detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 141101 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuroda, K. et al. Large-scale cryogenic gravitational wave telescope. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 8, 557 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Akutsu, T. et al. Construction of KAGRA: an underground gravitational-wave observatory. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 013F01 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeda, H. et al. Polarization test of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences. Phys. Rev. D 98, 022008 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abbot, B. P. et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Rev. Relativ. 21, 3 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, J. et al. Prospects for doubling the range of Advanced LIGO. Phys. Rev. D 91, 062005 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Degallaix, J. Advanced Virgo+ Preliminary Studies VIR-0300A-18 (Virgo Collaboration, 2018).

  28. Punturo, M. et al. The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbott, B. P. et al. Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors. Class. Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by MEXT, JSPS Leading-edge Research Infrastructure Program, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research 26000005, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 2905: JP17H06358, JP17H06361 and JP17H06364, JSPS Core-to-Core Program (A. Advanced Research Networks), JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) 17H06133, the joint research programme of the Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, National Research Foundation (NRF) grant of Korea and Computing Infrastructure Project of KISTI-GSDC in Korea, the LIGO project, and the Virgo project. The authors appreciate M. Karouzos for his kind feedback to improve the draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



C. Kim, Y. Michimura, H. Shinkai and A. Shoda were responsible for writing the first draft of the manuscript and incorporated comments from the collaboration in the course of completing the manuscript. All members of the KAGRA collaboration were responsible for the scope and scientific facts of the manuscript, including data analysis and the resulting figures.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to C. Kim, Y. Michimura, H. Shinkai or A. Shoda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KAGRA collaboration. KAGRA: 2.5 generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Nat Astron 3, 35–40 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing