The traditional university science curriculum was designed to train specialists in specific disciplines. However, in universities all over the world, science students are going into increasingly diverse careers and the current model does not fit their needs. Advances in technology also make certain modes of learning obsolete. In the past ten years, the Faculty of Science of the University of Hong Kong has undertaken major curriculum reforms. A sequence of science foundation courses required of all incoming science students are designed to teach science in an integrated manner, and to emphasize the concepts and utilities, not computational techniques, of mathematics. A number of non-discipline-specific common core courses have been developed to broaden students’ awareness of the relevance of science to society and the interdisciplinary nature of science. By putting the emphasis on the scientific process rather than the outcome, students are taught how to identify, formulate, and solve diverse problems.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.67 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Heffron, J. M. The knowledge most worth having: Otis W. Caldwell (1869–1947) and the rise of the general science course. Sci. Educ. 4, 227–252 (1995).
A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Education Reform (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983).
Jaffee, D. The general education initiatives in Hong Kong: organized contradictions and emerging tensions. High. Educ. 64, 193–206 (2012).
Kwok, S. Our Place in the Universe: Understanding Fundamental Astronomy from Ancient Discoveries. (Springer, Berlin, 2017).
Adams, J. V. Student evaluations: the ratings game. Inquiry 1, 10–16 (1997).
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. & Wieman, C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 862–864 (2011).
I thank my HKU colleagues who helped me implement the curriculum reform at HKU, in particular N. K. Tsing and E. K. F. Lam, who were instrumental in the design of the science foundation courses. I am grateful to H. C. von Bergmann and C. Pennypacker of the Global Science Education Network for their advice on the reform.
The author declares no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kwok, S. Science education in the 21st century. Nat Astron 2, 530–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0510-4