Perspective | Published:

Curiosity and the end of discrimination

Nature Astronomy volume 1, Article number: 0145 (2017) | Download Citation



Systemic discrimination on the basis of gender and race, among other ascribed identities, harms minoritized people. This is a structural problem in society, and astronomy is not immune to it. Although we talk about the challenges faced by ‘women and minorities’, it is all too rare to acknowledge intersecting realities: some of us are minority women and our experiences are different from both white women and minority men, with sexism and racism compounding in nonlinear ways. Confronting the challenges associated with invoking an intersectional analysis can be daunting if the mainstream community continues to ignore helpful work from the social sciences, which can teach us new ways of understanding how we produce scientific knowledge. Rather than failing to question how science is done, we should let curiosity be our guide.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , , & Building an inclusive AAS — The critical role of diversity and inclusion training for AAS council and astronomy leadership. Preprint at (2016).

  2. 2.

    The Black Seventies (ed. Barbour, F.) 265–282 (Porter Sargent, 1970).

  3. 3.

    , & Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nat. Astron. 1, 0141 (2017).

  4. 4.

    et al. LGBT Climate in Physics: Building an Inclusive Community (APS, 2016).

  5. 5.

    Yale Law & Policy Review 32, 14 (2013).

  6. 6.

    (ed.) The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader (Duke Univ. Press, 2011).

  7. 7.

    Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries (Routledge, 2015).

  8. 8.

    & Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Fabrication of Power (Univ. Chicago Press, 2015).

  9. 9.

    Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and The Politics of Diversity (Univ. Illinois Press, 2014).

  10. 10.

    Let science be science again. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (4 April 2017);

  11. 11.

    III Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue and the Old Regime (Univ. Chicago Press, 2010).

  12. 12.

    Implicit bias in astronomy. Nat. Astron. 1, 0151 (2017).

  13. 13.

    & Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination Working paper 9873 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005).

  14. 14.

    The History of White People (W. W. Norton & Company, 2011).

  15. 15.

    Let physics be the dream it used to be. Medium (2 May 2015);

  16. 16.

    WebCASPAR (National Science Foundation, 2006);

  17. 17.

    Nature 518, 288–291 (2015).

  18. 18.

    The self-construction of Black women physicists. Medium (27 February 2017);

  19. 19.

    #MarginSci: The March for Science as a microcosm of liberal racism. The Root (20 April 2017);

  20. 20.

    Objectivity and Diversity (Univ. Chicago Press, 2015).

Download references

Author information


  1. Department of Physics, University of Washington, Box 351560, Seattle, Washington 98195-1560, USA.

    • Chanda Prescod-Weinstein


  1. Search for Chanda Prescod-Weinstein in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanda Prescod-Weinstein.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading