Universal coronavirus vaccines: the time to start is now

The continued explosive spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) despite aggressive public health measures has triggered an unprecedented international vaccine effort. However, correlates of protection, which can help guide intelligent vaccine design, are not known for SARS-CoV-2. Research on influenza immunity and vaccine development may provide valuable lessons for coronavirus efforts, especially considering similarities in rapid evolutionary potential. The apparent inevitability of future novel coronavirus outbreaks must prompt work on a universal coronavirus vaccine.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic continues to spread throughout the world with explosive outbreaks underway throughout much of Europe and the United States. Even though the pandemic has slowed down in some countries, other nations are still experiencing a rapid rise in cases and their healthcare systems are pushed to the limits1. The case fatality ratio (CFR) varies widely by country and while population characteristics and access to healthcare are critically important factors, differences in the extent of testing of mild cases are likely responsible for some of the observed variation in the CFR through effects on the denominator. Interestingly, in the hardest hit areas, only a small fraction of the population has been reported to be infected. It is unclear how much of this is due to asymptomatic clinical presentations, testing availability, viral transmission dynamics, changes in individual behavior, and aggressive isolation and quarantine actions. Some experts suspect a significant number of mild or asymptomatic infections go undiagnosed, leading to a falsely elevated CFR and making the pandemic much more difficult to control in the setting of asymptomatic transmission2. Public health measures helped to extinguish the SARS outbreak 17 years ago, but so far, they have only been able to slow down the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic3.

In order to combat the disease, governments, international organizations, private companies, and academic institutions across the planet have launched a multifaceted vaccine development response with unprecedented rapidity. At least 110 vaccine candidates are in preclinical testing and at least 5 vaccines have already begun early clinical testing4. The focus of the response is haste, understandably so, leading to use of novel technologies, including DNA plasmids, viral vectors, virus-like particles, Baculovirus/mammalian expression systems, and mRNA vaccines among others. Many of these utilize sequencing information that was made available quickly after the onset of the outbreak and can be developed more rapidly than classical vaccine preparation strategies utilizing live virus as substrate, which necessitate the use of cumbersome biosafety protection measures5. The purpose of most early candidate vaccines is development of antibodies against the Spike glycoprotein (S protein), which have been implicated in protection against SARS-CoV in animal models and have been found in SARS-COV and SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patient sera6,7,8. However, we do not yet have evidence to show that anti-S protein antibodies are protective in humans against SARS-CoV-2, and if they are, how much protection is afforded. Recent data have shown 94% of patients who recover from mild Covid-19 have neutralizing antibodies 2 weeks after symptom onset, but neutralizing antibody titers correlate only moderately with measured anti-S protein antibody9. Careful study of potential patients with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection may help shed light on this question, but cases have not been documented in the literature. Reports may be confounded by prolonged RNA shedding, which can persist over 30 days in almost 10% of patients, regardless of resolution of symptoms10. The viability of virus associated with prolonged shedding and consequently the infectivity of these patients is also unknown, considering that in a separate study of nine patients, live SARS-CoV-2 was isolated only up to day 7 despite ongoing high viral loads by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction11. The distinction between viable virus and RNA shedding may have ramifications on study of immune correlates of viral clearance.

Vaccine development against respiratory viruses is a challenging task. Currently, the only approved vaccines against respiratory viruses are those against influenza. Despite decades of research, modern vaccines have had limited effectiveness against seasonal influenza and are unlikely to provide broad protection against novel influenza strains capable of causing pandemics12,13. Only in the past few years, a century after the advent of the 1918 influenza pandemic that was one of the most catastrophic events in human history responsible for 50–100 million deaths, a concerted effort was initiated to accelerate the development of a universal influenza vaccine13,14. Many unknowns exist with respect to SARS-CoV-2, but research into influenza immunity and vaccine development may provide valuable lessons for Covid-19 and may help guide vaccination strategies. We have known for decades that antibodies against hemagglutinin (the dominant surface protein of the influenza particle) at a titer of 1:40 or greater are associated with >50% reduction in disease, but more recent data have suggested antibody against influenza neuraminidase, another viral surface protein, may be a superior predictor of clinical outcomes15,16. We have no such knowledge of correlates of protection against coronaviruses, and specifically against SARS-CoV-2, thereby making the process of developing an effective vaccine that much more difficult. Interestingly, the importance of anti-neuraminidase immunity in protection against influenza was recognized during the H3N2 pandemic. Through serendipitous ongoing trials, researchers were able to seize an opportunity to obtain preinfection and postinfection sera demonstrating the ability of anti-neuraminidase antibodies to reduce infection rates17. We need to obtain similar information for SARS-CoV-2 to help guide and refine vaccine development.

Both influenza and coronaviruses have an inherent capacity for rapid mutation due to the low fidelity of RNA polymerase and a capability to form novel viruses through reassortment with a vast reservoir of zoonotic viruses13,18,19. Influenza surface proteins have non-conserved regions which can accommodate mutations that limit the effect of antibodies without impairing enzyme activity (antigenic drift), potentially leading to loss of immunity in infected or vaccinated individuals from one season to the next20. Genetic drift of spike protein has been demonstrated in endemic human coronavirus OC43, suggesting mutations can be accumulated in non-conserved regions over time21. Furthermore, an escape mutation conferring resistance to neutralizing antibody was found in vitro after applying immune pressure to 2002/2003 SARS-CoV. Interestingly, this mutation was also found to have occurred naturally in 2003/2004 SARS-CoV strains raising the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to evolve resistance against antibodies induced by some vaccine strategies currently under development18. Genetic differences within the receptor-binding domain (RBD) discriminating two major types of circulating SARS-CoV-2 indicate that the virus is already adapting22. Targeting of conserved epitopes has been proposed as a strategy to combat influenza’s adaptive capabilities and may be a potential strategy against SARS-CoV-2 as well. Amino acid sequence similarity between SARS-CoV S protein and SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been estimated only at 77% with significant changes present in the RBD19,23. In this context, many antibodies against SARS-CoV S protein have not shown promising SARS-CoV-2 binding and neutralizing capacity24,25,26. Similarly, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 RBD have not shown cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV RBD or Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV RBD24. Recent work has clarified that, despite only 46.7% protein sequence similarity between the SARS-CoV S1B receptor-binding subdomain and the SARS-CoV-2 S1B receptor-binding subdomain, the S1B RBD core domain is highly conserved27. Antibodies have been identified targeting epitopes in S1B RBD core domain, which show cross-reactive potential against both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-223,24,27. These findings may help guide development of vaccines with broader coverage, though the protective effects of such antibodies have yet to be demonstrated in animal models or human studies.

An additional problem is the waning of antibody titers over time after vaccination or recovery from live infection. Consequently, individuals are left vulnerable to reinfection, as demonstrated in influenza, even with an identical strain during the next season28. Similarly, antibodies against S protein diminished over time in SARS survivors29. We are then faced with a critically important but unanswered question: For how long will SARS-CoV-2 circulate? Whereas the SARS outbreak was extinguished, all five characterized pandemic influenza viruses established endemicity, facilitated, at least in part, by antigenic drift and waning antibody titers. Though impossible to predict with certainty, the prospect of SARS-CoV-2 also establishing endemicity is one the medical community needs to be prepared for, including the potential for accumulation of mutations in the face of increasing immune pressure. Considering that three coronavirus outbreaks have occurred in the past two decades, even if SARS-CoV-2 disappears in a similar fashion to SARS-CoV, it seems inevitable that another novel coronavirus outbreak will occur in the future. Acknowledging the limitations in cross-protection of most SARS-CoV-induced antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, it is quite likely that vaccines tailored to SARS-CoV-2 would not offer protection against novel coronaviruses25,26. Even with advances in the rapidity of vaccine development technology, the delay between epidemic onset and implementation of a novel vaccine candidate in the community is responsible for immense societal costs.

After the SARS outbreak, we lost interest and failed to complete development of a vaccine for use in case of a recurrent outbreak. We must not make the same mistake again. Instead we must go further. We must work toward a universal coronavirus vaccine with broad protection against a diverse number of coronaviruses. We need to understand the correlates of protection against coronaviruses and improve our understanding of their pathogenesis, transmission, and viral evolution. These studies will be absolutely necessary for us to intelligently design efficacious vaccines not just against SARS-CoV-2 but also against other coronaviruses that are likely to emerge in the future. If work on influenza can serve as a lesson, a universal coronavirus vaccine will not be easy to develop, but if we do not start work on one now, we will find ourselves in a similar situation during the next outbreak.

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report - 111. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200510covid-19-sitrep-111.pdf?sfvrsn=1896976f_2 (2020).

  2. 2.

    Gandhi, M., Yokoe, D. S. & Havlir, D. V. Asymptomatic transmission, the Achilles’ heel of current strategies to control Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2009758 (2020).

  3. 3.

    Anderson, R. M. et al. Epidemiology, transmission dynamics and control of SARS: the 2002-2003 epidemic. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1091–1105 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Thanh Le, T. et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 305–306 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wu, F. et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579, 265–269 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Subbarao, K. et al. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J. Virol. 78, 3572–3577 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhong, X. et al. B-cell responses in patients who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome target a dominant site in the S2 domain of the surface spike glycoprotein. J. Virol. 79, 3401–3408 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Guo, L. et al. Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa310 (2020).

  9. 9.

    Wu, F. et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047365v2 (2020).

  10. 10.

    Li, N., Wang, X. & Lv, T. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding: not a rare phenomenon. J. Med. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25952 (2020).

  11. 11.

    Wolfel, R. et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x (2020).

  12. 12.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Past seasons vaccine effectiveness estimates. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/past-seasons-estimates.html (2019).

  13. 13.

    Morens, D. M. & Taubenberger, J. K. Making universal influenza vaccines: lessons from the 1918 pandemic. J. Infect. Dis. 219, S5–S13 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Paules, C. I., Marston, H. D., Eisinger, R. W., Baltimore, D. & Fauci, A. S. The pathway to a universal influenza vaccine. Immunity 47, 599–603 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Memoli, M. J. et al. Evaluation of antihemagglutinin and antineuraminidase antibodies as correlates of protection in an influenza A/H1N1 virus healthy human challenge model. mBio 7, e00417-16 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Hobson, D., Curry, R. L., Beare, A. S. & Ward-Gardner, A. The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 70, 767–777 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Monto, A. & Kendal, A. Effect of neuraminidase antibody on Hong Kong influenza. Lancet 301, 623–625 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sui, J. et al. Broadening of neutralization activity to directly block a dominant antibody-driven SARS-coronavirus evolution pathway. PLoS Pathog. 4, e1000197 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sandbulte, M. R. et al. Discordant antigenic drift of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin in H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20748–20753 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ren, L. et al. Genetic drift of human coronavirus OC43 spike gene during adaptive evolution. Sci. Rep. 5, 11451 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tang, X. et al. On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Natl Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036 (2020).

  23. 23.

    Yuan, M. et al. A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor-binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science 368, 630–633 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tian, X. et al. Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 382–385 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020).

  27. 27.

    Wang, C. et al. A human monoclonal antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 11, 2251 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Memoli, M. J. et al. Influenza A reinfection in sequential human challenge: implications for protective immunity and “universal” vaccine development. Clin. Infect. Dis. 70, 748–753 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Liu, W. et al. Two-year prospective study of the humoral immune response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 193, 792–795 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIAID.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.T.G. contributed to literature review and writing. A.H. and M.J.M. contributed to writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca T. Giurgea.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giurgea, L.T., Han, A. & Memoli, M.J. Universal coronavirus vaccines: the time to start is now. npj Vaccines 5, 43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-020-0198-1

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing