Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) lack broad efficacy. Cellular immunity to a conserved internal antigen, the nucleoprotein (NP), has been correlated to protection against pandemic and seasonal influenza and thus could have the potential to broaden vaccine efficacy. We developed OVX836, a recombinant protein vaccine based on an oligomerized NP, which shows increased uptake by dendritic cells and immunogenicity compared with NP. Intramuscular immunization in mice with OVX836 induced strong NP-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell systemic responses and established CD8+ tissue memory T cells in the lung parenchyma. Strikingly, OVX836 protected mice against viral challenge with three different influenza A subtypes, isolated several decades apart and induced a reduction in viral load. When co-administered with IIV, OVX836 was even more effective in reducing lung viral load.
Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) aim to prevent infection, and are usually partially successful. A recent meta-analysis from 2004 to 2015 seasons found an efficacy of 33% (confidence interval (CI) = 26–39%) against H3N2 viruses, compared with 61% (CI = 57–65%) against H1N1 and 54% (CI = 46–61%) against influenza B viruses.1 During the pH1N1 pandemic of 2009, monovalent vaccines containing an adjuvant had median effectiveness of 69% (CI = 60–93%).1 But by targeting only the surface glycoproteins, current influenza vaccines run the risk of having much lower effectiveness should a mismatch occur between the strains included in the vaccine and the strains actually circulating. This happened most recently in the Northern Hemisphere during the 2014–2015 season,2 in which vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be as low as 23%,3 due to drift mutations in the hemagglutinin antigenic site B of the circulating H3 strain,4 but current influenza vaccines retain some effectiveness even when mismatches occur.5
Nonetheless, a vaccine approach based on cellular responses to conserved internal antigens could minimize the effects of antigenic drift and even mismatches. Influenza pandemics are very informative in this respect: in a retrospective serological study6 of the H2N2 pandemic of 1957, suggestive evidence was found that adults exposed to the new virus were spared from influenza more frequently than children. The author proposed that the main protective factor in adults was immunity resulting from prior infection with earlier (non-H2N2) strains. The recent H7N9 influenza outbreak, with >600 documented cases has been particularly instructive. Indeed, a small study of 16 hospitalized patients lacking neutralizing antibodies showed that those who recovered (12 patients) had significantly stronger CD8+, CD4+, and NK cell immune responses to the H7N9 virus than those (4 patients) who did not recover from the infection.7 Noteworthy, early cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses were associated with more rapid recovery.7
The H1N1 pandemic of 2009 provided further opportunities to determine whether heterosubtypic immunity to influenza exists in humans. A prospective cohort study conducted during the H1N1 pandemic of 2009 showed that individuals who developed less severe illness harbored higher frequencies of pre-existing T cells with specificity for conserved CD8 epitopes.8 In human challenge studies, on the other hand, pre-existing CD4+, but not CD8+ T cells responding to influenza internal proteins were associated with lower virus shedding and less severe illness.9
Most recently, the Flu Watch Cohort Study10 has investigated whether pre-existing T-cell responses targeting internal viral proteins could provide protective immunity against pandemic and seasonal influenza. NP is one of the most conserved internal influenza antigens; even the most divergent protein sequences differ by <11%.11 The presence of NP-specific T cells before exposure to virus correlated with less symptomatic, PCR-positive influenza A, during both pandemic and seasonal periods, whereas other conserved antigens were at best of lesser importance.10 Additionally, it has been recently possible to demonstrate a strong immune selection against NP CD8+ epitopes in the human influenza lineage when compared with those of the swine lineage. This observation highlights the importance of immune responses against this internal NP antigen, notably considering that other conserved viral antigens, such as the matrix (M1) protein, do not undergo a similar immune selection.12
Finally, a comprehensive study comparing systematically the conserved influenza antigens, administered in modified vaccinia virus ankara Modified vaccinia virus ankara (MVA), found that only vectors expressing NP, either alone or in combination with other conserved influenza proteins, protected mice against lethal challenges with H5N1, H7N1, and H9N2.13 Altogether, these studies, added to the fact that NP contains CD8+ epitopes that can be dominant in both HLA-A2-positive14 and HLA-A2-negative humans,15 illustrate the potential utility of cellular immune responses against this conserved NP influenza antigen. NP has been regularly detected in IIV formulations,16,17 in variable, but sometimes considerable amounts.18 However, it has been shown that, when included in the IIV, NP exerts relatively poor CD8+ T-cell immunogenicity both in humans and in mice.19 There is a need, therefore, for novel forms of influenza NP capable of significantly enhancing the immunogenicity of this antigen, even when administered with IIV.
Oligomeric forms of protein antigens have been shown to be more immunogenic than the monomeric forms.20 To enhance the immunogenicity of NP, we have developed OVX313, an improved version of the oligomerization domain IMX31321,22,23,24,25,26 created as a hybrid of the C-terminal fragments of two avian C4bp α chain sequences that naturally oligomerize into heptamers.22 The heptameric oligomerization domain OVX313 is stabilized by intermolecular disulfide bonds and the extremely high oligomer stability is an interesting scaffold for applications in the field of protein engineering and vaccines.
This study describes OVX836, a recombinant protein candidate vaccine, which consists of the fusion of OVX313 with the nucleoprotein (NP) of influenza A (H1N1/WSN/1933). OVX836 increased immunogenicity over NP and protected against multiple influenza subtypes.
Design of OVX836, based on NP fused to a small oligomerization domain and DNA-based immunization
We set out to make a more immunogenic version of NP by fusing it to the small oligomerization domain OVX313, derived from the previously described IMX31321,22 and described in Methods (Fig. 1a). Then, to determine whether the immunogenicity of the influenza NP could be improved by fusing it to either IMX313 or OVX313, four plasmids were constructed (NP, NP-IMX313, NP-OVX313 = OVX836, and empty vector) and used to immunize mice.
Cellular immune responses induced 2 weeks after the last DNA vaccination were measured in spleen by ELISpots using either NP to stimulate total T cells (Fig. 1b) and purified CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1c), or the immunodominant peptide NP366–374 to stimulate CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1c). The administration of NP DNA alone induced a weak interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing T cells response, not significantly different from the empty vector. On the contrary, we showed that significant amounts of NP-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells, including NP-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells response, were induced by OVX836 DNA vaccination, the level of response being increased compared with the response achieved after empty vector, NP or NP-IMX313 DNA vaccination (p < 0.01).
In parallel, serum antibody responses to NP were measured 14 days after the last immunization. Mice immunized with NP alone showed only low levels of NP-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses, whereas OVX836 immunized mice had significantly higher IgG antibody responses compared with all other groups of immunized mice (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1d).
In summary, our results show that fusing NP to the OVX313 domain improves both NP antigen-specific T-cell and IgG antibody responses, with OVX836 showing immunogenicity superior to NP-IMX313, which is already more immunogenic than NP.
OVX836 protein is an oligomeric form of NP with improved immunogenicity
Based on the results obtained with DNA immunizations, two recombinant proteins were produced in Escherichia coli: NP from the prototype human isolate A/Wilson-Smith/1933 (ref. 27), referred to here as NP, and the same antigen fused through its C-terminus to OVX313, called OVX836. Both OVX836 and NP proteins were purified using heparin sepharose affinity columns. The purity of the recombinant proteins was analyzed by Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing and denaturing conditions (Fig. 2a, left). OVX836 and NP resolved as single bands at approximatively 64 and 56 kDa, as expected from the cloned amino-acid sequences (theoretical MWs of 62.7 and 56.2 kDa, respectively). Moreover, OVX836 and NP were recognized by a Monoclonal antibody (MAb) raised against NP (Fig. 2a, right).
OVX836 and NP were then examined by means of reversed-phase (RP) chromatography, showing that purified recombinant proteins were very homogeneous (Fig. 2b). Both molecules exhibited a single-elution peak that represents >97% of the total protein area at 280 nm. OVX836 and NP showed a main peak corresponding to the heptameric and monomeric form of NP, respectively. As expected, treatment with the reducing agent tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) did not modify the chromatographic profile of NP. In contrast, the reduction of disulfide bonds promoted dissociation of the OVX836 subunits into lower association states (Fig. 2b), showing that intermolecular disulfide bonds were required for the stabilization of the heptameric state of OVX836 under RP conditions. Under aqueous conditions, OVX836 is heptameric independently from disulphide bonds.
Based on the results from gel filtration chromatography, the most abundant form of NP was a trimer of 150 kDa and only few monomers were observed (Supplementary Figure 1a). The analysis of the oligomeric state of purified recombinant NP has indicated a broad distribution of oligomeric states.28,29 In contrast, a mutated version of NP did not self-associate and formed only monomers of 55 kDa as the E339A and R416A mutations in the tail loop result in the complete loss of NP trimerization.29 The heptameric state of OVX836, as well as small oligomers of heptamers (di-/tri-heptamers) were consistently observed (MW in a range from 400 to 1200 kDa), which is consistent from batch-to-batch. Interestingly, the OVX836 tail loop mutant did not show small oligomers of heptamers (Supplementary Figure 1b).
Therefore, OVX836 and NP are pure and homogenous proteins, and compared with the native NP trimer of 150 kDa, OVX836 is mainly organized as mono-, di-, and tri-heptamers under aqueous conditions (400–1200 kDa) (Supplementary Figure 1a). Our experiments also indicated that OVX836 is a stable heptamer due to noncovalent intermolecular interactions, as well as the formation of disulfide bridges between the subunits. The Fig. 2c shows a schematic representation of OVX836 protein heptamer.
We then investigated the mechanisms by which OVX836 could be up-taken by professional antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells (DCs). DCs were generated in vitro from murine bone marrow cultivated with Flt3 ligand (Flt3L), as a convenient source of pDC and cDC that are equivalent to the spleen CD8α+ and CD8α– DC.30 We first checked whether OVX836 was internalized by the different DCs subset. Imaging using ImageStreamX showed a strong internalization of OVX836, localizing in vesicles within DCs (Supplementary Figure 2a, b). Kinetic studies using flow cytometry using Alexa647-labeled proteins (3 mol dye/mol protein) confirmed that OVX836 and NP products are rapidly internalized (within 2 h) by DC (Fig. 2d). The levels of incorporation are dose and time dependent (percentage and MFI), with OVX836 being more efficiently incorporated than NP, even after 24-h incubation.
The immunogenicity of the recombinant proteins NP and OVX836 were measured in C57BL6 mice following two intramuscular (i.m.) injections with doubling doses from 6.25 µg to 50 µg. Fourteen days after the last immunization, immune responses against the NP protein were detected by ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT to measure NP-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells in response to NP stimulation (Fig. 2e). The results showed that the NP induced moderate T-cell immune responses and OVX836 protein was more immunogenic at all doses than NP, reaching a maximum response from 25 µg (p < 0.0001).
Furthermore, OVX836 elicited high titer serum NP-specific IgG antibodies, which increased with the dose and were higher than with NP at all doses (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2f). Together, these results showed that the fusion protein OVX836 more effectively stimulates T cells and B cells than NP alone.
OVX836 induces high NP-specific systemic immunogenic responses, local T cells in the lung, and can be used in combination with IIV
We next studied the effect of OVX836 at 25 µg alone, or in association with the IIV in C57BL/6 mice, following two i.m. injections; these co-administrations took place in the same hind limb but with injection into different muscles. To characterize the cellular immune responses elicited in mice, NP-specific IFN-γ after the two immunizations were quantified using ELISPOT assays. In the group immunized with OVX836 or OVX836 combined with IIV, a strong NP-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells response was induced in the spleen and in lung. This response was significantly higher than in control group p < 0.0001 (Fig. 3a, b). IIV as expected elicited only low levels of NP-specific T-cell responses. In addition, in both the spleen and lung, OVX836 and the combination of OVX836 with IIV by the i.m. route were highly immunogenic, inducing NP-specific CD4+ and NP366-374-specific CD8+ T cells response >10-fold higher than phosphate buffered saline (PBS) group (Fig. 3c, d).
To additionally characterize the NP-specific immune response induced by OVX836, we assessed the magnitude of cytokines released in the culture supernatants from the lung cells stimulated with NP366-374 peptide, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Mabtech). Immunization with OVX836 alone or in combination with IIV induced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-2 (IL-2) compared with control PBS or IIV group (but not IL-4) (Supplementary Figure 3). These data suggest that OVX836 was able to induce a strong Th1 immune response in the lung with significant increases in the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 cytokines that can contribute to influenza clearance.
Specific CD8+ T-cell response in the lung and spleen by ELISpot, was induced by OVX836, suggesting that the antigen was cross presented. We also analyzed the quality of the CD8+ T cells induced by OVX836 alone or in combination with IIV. The frequency of NP366-374-specific CD8+ T cells following immunization was assessed using pentamer staining by flow cytometry (Fig. 3e, f) 14 days after the last immunization to confirm the CD8+ T-cell activation. Within the spleens of mice, we observed an increased percentage of NP366-374-specific CD8+ T cells following immunization with OVX836 alone or in combination with IIV compared with IIV or to unvaccinated groups (Fig. 3e). We next analyzed the presence of NP366-374-specific memory CD8+ T cells within the lung parenchyma using intravascular staining to exclude cells in the lung vasculature. Immunization with OVX836 induced the generation of NP366-374-specific memory CD8+ T cells that were located within the lung parenchyma (Fig. 3f). Interestingly, the combination of OVX836 with IIV elicited even higher numbers of lung resident memory CD8+ T cells (p < 0.05). These results indicate that OVX836 induced virus-specific memory CD8+ T cells that can infiltrate lung tissues.
Taken together, our results show that OVX836 induces strong systemic NP-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells response, as well as NP-specific IgG; it also induces lung memory CD8+ T cells against NP localized in the lung parenchyma.
Vaccination with OVX836 protects mice against lethal infection with the influenza H1N1 A/WSN/33 strain
The most important feature of an effective vaccine candidate is the capacity to protect individuals against symptoms and signs of infection. To evaluate this aspect, we performed experimental infections in C57BL/6 mice previously immunized with either PBS (control), IIV, OVX836, or a combination of IIV and OVX836 (OVX836/IIV), using the H1N1 A/WSN/33 influenza virus, harboring the same NP protein present in OVX836. In order to eliminate possible model-associated bias in the interpretation of results and anticipating further pre-clinical evaluation, identical experiments were also performed using the other classic influenza infection mouse model, Balb/c mice. As shown in Fig. 4, intranasal (i.n.) inoculation of PBS-immunized (control) mice with H1N1 A/WSN/33 influenza strain resulted in 90% mortality and 20% maximum mean weight loss in both mouse strains. On the other hand, whereas immunization with IIV conferred partial protection (60% survival rates) against the H1N1 A/WSN/33 challenge (not included in the IIV formulation) in Balb/c, it failed to protect C57BL/6 mice (10% survival rate). More importantly, both OVX836 and OVX836/IIV vaccinated groups were highly protected against viral challenge in both mouse strains, as shown by survival rates of 90 and 100% in C57BL/6 and 100 and 100% in Balb/c mice, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). Additionally, although a mild weight loss was observed in Balb/c mice immunized with OVX836 (10% maximum mean weight loss (Fig. 4d)), no significant weight loss (<5%) was observed for either the OVX836 or OVX836/IIV immunized in C57BL/6 (Fig. 4c). OVX836 and OVX836/IIV vaccination also induced 1-log or higher reductions in lung viral titers (LVTs) compared with the PBS control group, especially in the case of the OX836/IIV combination (Fig. 4e, f). Finally, both pre- and post-challenge hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers against the H1N1 A/WSN/33 virus, as well as the viral strains contained in the IIV formulation were comparable between the two mouse strains, hence validating the IgG responses expected as a result of both IIV vaccination and challenge (Table 1). Of note, OVX836 vaccination did not induce any HAI responses, and tended to increase the HAI response toward some viral strains included in the IIV.
These results show that OVX836 immunization protected both C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice against a lethal challenge infection with H1N1 A/WSN/33 strain. Moreover, when IIV and OVX836 were co-administered, decreased viral load in lungs were observed.
Vaccination with OVX836 induces broad protection against lethal challenge with different influenza A subtypes
In view of the positive results obtained for H1N1 A/WSN/33 infection in two different mouse strains, we further investigated the protective capacity of OVX836 against two additional influenza subtypes A, in the Balb/c lethal infection model (Fig. 5). Mice were immunized with either PBS, IIV, OVX836, or a combination of IIV and OVX836 (OVX836/IIV) following the same experimental protocol described above, and then i.n. infected with either H1N1 A/California/7/2009 (homologous to the H1N1 strain present in the IIV and containing an NP protein with 93% identity to the OVX836 NP protein) or H3N2 A/Victoria/3/75 (heterologous to IIV and containing an NP protein with 90% identity to the OVX836 NP protein) viruses. Of note, preliminary experiments were performed in order to calibrate the viral inoculum and lung sampling time-point to obtain comparable mortality rates among the different viral strains used, as well as to measure LVTs at the peak of viral replication. Infection of PBS-immunized (control) mice with H1N1 A/California/7/2009 or H3N2 A/Victoria/3/75 resulted in 100 and 90% mortality, respectively, as well as >20% maximum mean weight loss in both cases (Fig. 5a, b). As expected, the two IIV-containing groups (IIV and OVX836/IIV) showed no signs of mortality or weight loss following infection with the H1N1 A/California/7/2009 virus, which in turn produced mild (>10%) weight loss in the OVX836 group with 100% survival rate (Fig. 5a, c). This observation is further supported by 1-log, 4-log, and 6-log reductions in mean LVTs for the OVX836, IIV and OVX836/IIV groups, respectively, compared with the PBS control group (Fig. 5e).
IIV conferred only partial protection (40% survival and 18% weight loss) against the non-homologous H3N2 A/Victoria/3/75 virus. Conversely, both OVX836 and OVX836/IIV vaccinated groups were fully protected (100% survival) against lethal viral challenge with the H3N2 influenza A strain, yet showing 15% mean maximum weight losses. Indeed, the main difference for these two groups in terms of weight loss was driven by a shorter recovery time compared with the PBS and IIV groups (Fig. 5b, d). OVX836 and OVX836/IIV vaccination induced 1-log and 2-log reductions in mean LVTs, respectively (Fig. 5f). Once again, HAI titers against the viral strains used for infection, as well those included in the IIV vaccine formulation confirm the expected antibodies response following IIV vaccinations and challenge (Supplementary Table 1). Interestingly, pre-challenge H1N1 A/California/7/2009 HA titers induced by the OVX836/IIV group tended to be higher than those of the IIV group alone and OVX836 vaccination did not induce any HAI responses, consistent with the observations of Table 1.
Taken together, the results of the different challenge tests demonstrate the efficacy of OVX836 alone to provide protection against lethal viral infection with different influenza A strains. In addition, when OVX836 and IIV were combined for the vaccination, IIV being either homologous or heterologous to the viral strain used for the challenge, decrease of the viral loads in lungs were achieved.
Influenza is one of the major infectious disease threats for humans in terms of annual health impact of seasonal influenza and in terms of potential dramatic global consequences of an influenza pandemic outbreak.31 Licensed influenza vaccines induce antibodies against the hemagglutinin, a highly polymorphic surface antigen, and as such, need to be reformulated and re-administered every year. A vaccine providing protective immunity against highly conserved, mostly internal, antigens could provide longer-lasting protection and cover multiple influenza subtypes.32,33 However, even though such universal influenza vaccines are subject to much discussions and many reviews, only a handful of candidates have reached the clinical testing stage.34,35 Despite their limited efficacy,34 current seasonal vaccines remain the most effective way to prevent influenza outbreaks and annual vaccination is recommended for all people aged ≥6 months in the United States and Europe.36,37,38
A wide consensus developed the hypothesis that NP probably plays a role in influenza protection with the induction of NP-specific CD8+ T-cell responses mainly through CTL cross-reactions.19,39,40,41,42,43 B cells activation and NP antibody response could also play a role in the protection against multiple influenza A strains.19,44 Since the pioneering studies of Wraith and his colleagues in the 1980s, it has been shown that the influenza NP purified from virions can induce good but incomplete protection against homologous and heterologous viral challenges in mice.45 The same group had previously shown that a combination of NP and HA primed the development of cytotoxic T cells that were cross-reactive against other influenza A viruses (IAVs).46
Furthermore, several research groups reported the capacity of different NP-based vaccines to accelerate viral clearance and prevent mortality in mice subsequently challenged with either matched or mis-matched IAV strains.47 In that regard, multiple studies on NP-based vaccines in the form of recombinant proteins,47,48,49,50,51 DNA vaccines,40,41,42,45,46 or viral vectors,13,52,53,54,55,56 confirmed the protective role of CTL immune responses targeting NP.
In this context, we developed a more immunogenic version of NP, capable of eliciting stronger and protective cytotoxic T-cell responses at systemic and mucosal site (lung). We initially fused NP to our first-generation oligomerization domain IMX313,21 and then to its improved version OVX313. Comparing with the IMX313, the C-terminal part of the OVX313, includes a short arginine cationic sequence to facilitate vaccine purification through chromatography. Through a DNA-based vaccine study, we compared the level of immunogenicity generated by the “naked” NP antigen and of NP fused to our technology, and found that the fusion to IMX313 increased the immunogenicity of the NP antigen, which was further significantly boosted by fusion to OVX313. Leveraging these DNA vaccine results, we developed a recombinant protein vaccine harboring the NP protein from the prototype influenza H1N1 A/WSN/33 human strain27 fused to OVX313. Our technology platform (OVX313) enables the production of an heptamerized form of the NP antigen, an OVX836 recombinant protein vaccine candidate. Several studies demonstrated that oligomerization of antigens using this platform (through OVX313 tag or its previous version IMX313) improves humoral and cellular immunogenicity in animals (Malaria antigens,23 Tuberculosis antigen 85A,24 Malaria Pfs25 antigen,25 HPV L2 antigen26).
OVX836 enhanced antigen uptake by DCs, and induced more NP-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells response, as well as NP-specific IgG compared with NP alone. When we compared OVX836 alone, in combination with an IIVs and IIV alone in a mice immunization study, we showed that OVX836 generated significantly higher T-cell responses than IIV alone. The cellular response obtained with the combination of IIV and OVX836 was similar to the one obtained with OVX836 alone. OVX836 induced high frequencies of cross-reactive NP-specific T cells, notably CD8+ T cells that were located in the lung parenchyma. For a long time, i.m. immunization has been considered as unable to generate mucosal immune responses. In the 2016, Su, et al. have published a large review of the literature demonstrating that i.m. vaccination can promote both systemic and mucosal immune responses, and protect against mucosal pathogen challenge.57 In our study, we demonstrated that i.m. immunization with OVX836 enhances NP-specific T-cell response localized in the lung parenchyma as shown by pentamer analysis using CD45 intravascular staining method.
Mice challenge studies showed that OVX836 alone provides effective protection against lethal infection with different subtypes of influenza A (A/WSN/33, H1N1, or H3N2). Based on current scientific knowledge, we hypothesize that the protection provided by administration of OVX836 alone is mostly mediated by CD8+ T-cell responses against the widely conserved NP antigen, with a potentiating action of CD4+ T-cell responses, and the potential contribution of NP-specific antibody responses. In the 1980s, Wraith et al. made the hypothesis that immune responses against NP would not prevent infection, but rather accelerate clearance of infected cells.40,41
This hypothesis is in line with the weight curves observed for most of the groups immunized with OVX836 alone, which experience initial body weight loss following the viral challenge comparable to that of the PBS-vaccinated mice, but with less severity and significantly faster recovery time. As a result, it shows the potential of OVX836 to provide broad-spectrum protection against moderate to severe cases caused by multiple A-strain viruses. Another attractive immunization strategy could be to leverage two lines of attack by associating NP-targeted CD8+ T-cell response provided by OVX836 with the humoral response against HA generated by the IIV. This is supported by our results showing decrease viral loads in mice, when OVX836 and IIV are used in combination, the IIV being either homologous or heterologous to the viral strain used for the challenge. Such combined vaccination strategy could prevent moderate to several cases cause by all influenza A subtypes and at the same time limit viral dissemination even when antibodies are less effective in neutralizing the virus.
Furthermore, we also noticed, with some viral strains used for the HAI assay, slightly better pre-challenge HAI titers in the OVX836/IIV vaccinated groups compared with those vaccinated with IIV alone. Although the real implications of this relatively mild increase remain to be determined, a potential contribution of OVX836 to the HA-specific humoral response induced by IIV might be worth further study.
The broad annual vaccination recommendation for people aged >6 months with current IIV might represent a double-edged weapon in the long term, since on one side, it confers partial yet important protection against circulating strains, but on the other side, it could create a potential risk that vaccine recipients will not develop the lasting heterosubtypic immunity usually acquired through repeated natural infections.38 An immunization strategy with a vaccine generating cellular response against NP, like OVX836, could present a double advantage by protecting against moderate to severe cases while not preventing subject’s natural infection and the development of lasting heterosubtypic immunity. Based on the mice experiments conducted so far, OVX836 is a good candidate vaccine in order to effectively induce cell-mediated immunity to a conserved antigen and provide wide protection against multiple A-strain influenza viruses. As NP is highly conserved with >95% homology within A strains,58 OVX836 represents an attractive standalone vaccination strategy to prevent influenza caused by circulating or emerging A strains, especially in a case of a pandemic outbreak. In the context of limited effectiveness of licensed seasonal vaccines, OVX836 immunization strategy could also be combined with current or next-generation vaccines triggering antibody responses against surface antigens in order to provide complete protection against multiple circulating and emerging A and B influenza subtypes.
OVX313, an improved version of the heptamerization domain IMX313
IMX313 is a 55-amino-acid protein domain, obtained as a hybrid of the C-terminal fragments of two avian C4bp proteins that naturally oligomerize into heptamers. Of note, in our IMX313 construction, avian C4bp sequences were engineered in order to minimize identities with their human counterparts. We have previously observed that following its fusion to a monomeric antigen, IMX313 allows the presentation of seven copies of the antigen to the immune system, increasing both B and T-cell immunogenicity.21,59 Based on this observation, we designed for the present study OVX313 as an optimized version of IMX313. We improved its oligomerization domain by substituting the last seven amino acids of IMX313 (originally LQGLSKE) by seven different amino acids (GRRRRRS), leaving the total length at 55-amino acids, which retains a heptameric core structure stabilized by monovalent intermolecular interactions and disulfide bonds.
Construction of plasmids
Four plasmids were constructed for DNA immunizations by modifying pGT-h-NP, a plasmid expressing NP,60 to create four new ones. First, the human tPA signal peptide sequence was amplified and inserted in-frame with the N-terminus of the NP coding sequence in pGT-h-NP creating a eukaryotic expression plasmid (pIMX714) for secreted NP,59 using the forward primer IMX1305 (5′-CACTGAGTGACATCAAAATCATGGATGCAATGAAGAGAGGGC-3′) and the reverse primer IMX1306 (5′-CGTAAGACCGTTTGGTGCCTTGGCTAGCTCTTCTGAATCGGGCATGGATTTCC-3′). This plasmid was then modified by inserting PCR products encoding either IMX313 creating the plasmid pIMX866 using the forward primer IMX1332 (5′-CTGATGTGTGCGGAGAGG-3′) and the reverse primer IMX1039 (5′-TAGAAGGCACAGTCGAGG-3′), or OVX313 creating the plasmid pIMX867 using the forward primer IMX1293 (5′-GGTCAGGATGATCAAACGTGGG-3′) and the reverse primer IMX1039 (5′-TAGAAGGCACAGTCGAGG-3′), from plasmids in laboratory stocks. Finally, an empty vector was constructed (pIMX719), by digestion of pGT-h-NP with the enzymes XbaI and HindIII, filling-in and re-ligating the ends, thus deleting the sequence encoding tPA and NP. All plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. Two bacterial expression plasmids were used for overproducing the NP of the prototype human influenza isolate WS.27 A synthetic gene, codon optimized for expression in Escherichia coli and encoding OVX836, was purchased from DNA2.0 (now ATUMBIO) in the bacterial expression vector pDR441-SR. This plasmid, called pOVX836, was modified to delete the sequence encoding OVX313, creating the expression plasmid for NP (strain A/Wilson-Smith/1933) called pNP.
Protein production and characterization
Both the NP and the OVX836 proteins were produced by using the bacterial strain BL21. Briefly, when bacterial growth reached the logarithmic phase, 0.5 mM isopropyl 𝛽-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was used to induce expression for 16 h at 25 °C. Recombinant NP and OVX836 proteins were purified by means of affinity chromatography on a heparin sepharose column. The mutated form of NP (mut-NP and mut-OVX836) was an E339A/R416A mutant NP that did not self-associate and formed only monomers29,59 (Supplementary Figure 1b).
Protein purity was evaluated by SDS-PAGE. Recombinant proteins were analyzed using a Criterion 4–12% Bis-tris gel (Bio-Rad), following the supplier's instructions. Briefly, proteins were denatured and reduced using NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (4×, Thermo) and NuPAGE reducing agent (10×, Thermo), respectively. The samples were heated at 70 °C for 10 min and then 0.5 µg of proteins were loaded on the Criterion 4–12% Bis-tris gel. The electrophoretic separation was carried out using a MOPS SDS running buffer at a constant voltage (200 V) for 50 min, using the NuPAGE antioxidant (Life Technologies). Proteins were detected using Instant Blue (Euromedex). Precision Plus Protein Standards (Bio-Rad) were used as molecular weight marker. Gel images were acquired with a Chemidoc Touch Imager (Bio-Rad) and images were then analyzed using the Image-Lab software (Bio-Rad).
Western blotting, using an antibody directed against NP antigen (MAb anti-NP, Clone 7B4G10G8), was performed to establish the identities of OVX836 and NP. Recombinant proteins were denatured and reduced as described previously. 1D-PAGE was performed as described above. The gel was then blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a Trans-blot transfer system and a Trans-blot nitrocellulose pack (Bio-Rad) following the supplier's instructions. Precision Plus Protein Western C Standards (Bio-Rad) were used as molecular weight markers. The membrane was blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin protein (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline-Tween-20 (TBS-T) (0.1%T, w/v) and then probed with the monoclonal antibody directed against NP antigen (MAb anti-NP, 1/3000). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies were purchased from Thermo (1/30000), and the chemiluminescence detection kit (Clarity ECL Western blot substrate) from Bio-Rad. Western blot signals were acquired with an instrument for western blot imaging (Chemidoc Touch Imager, Bio-Rad) and images were analyzed using the Image-Lab software (Bio-Rad).
RP ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UHPLC) was performed to provide information on protein homogeneity. Protein species were separated on a non-polar stationary phase with a gradient of hydrophobicity. Briefly, around 4.5 μg of protein were injected on a MAbPac RP column (Thermo, 4 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm), thermostated at 40 °C. The elution (0.4 mL/min) was performed using a linear gradient of acetonitrile with 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and monitored by UV detection at 280 nm. The reducing agent TCEP (10 mM final) was added to reduce proteins for RP-UHPCUV analysis.
High performance size exclusion chromatography (SE-UHPLC-UV) was performed in order to analyze product quaternary structures and sizes of recombinant molecules. Briefly, a BEH SEC450 (Waters, 4.6 × 150 mm, guard 4.6 × 30 mm), equilibrated at 30 °C, was used in combination with 50 mM Na/K2 phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.8 M arginine mobile phase. In all, 10 µg of protein sample was loaded onto the column and monitored by UV detection at 280 nm.
Cell preparation and flow cytometry analysis
Flow cytometry and fluorescence-based imaging flow cytometry were used to analyze the uptake of proteins labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 fluorochrome (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Life Technologies). Bone marrow DC were generated from C57BL/6 mice, cells were isolated by flushing femurs and tibias with culture medium RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen) containing 10% heat-inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 10 μg/ml gentamicin, 2 mM l-glutamine (Invitrogen), 50 μM 2-Mercaptoethanol (2-ME) (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen). Cells were filtrated through a 100-μm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon), centrifuged, and cultured at 2 × 106 cells/ml in medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml recombinant human Flt3l (Amgen).61 Flt3L-DC at days 7–8 of culture were incubated for the indicated time with Alexa647-labeled proteins. DC were washed and incubated 15 min with Live Dead reagent in PBS 1 × (Life technologies, 0.5 µl per well). DCs were collected and stained 45 min at 4 °C with antibodies specific for the murine cell surface antigens in FACS buffer (PBS1X, 1% FCS, 0.09% azide): CD11c (clone HL3), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD24 (M1/69), CD172a (P84) (all BD Biosciences). Prior to acquisition, cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Acquisition was performed on LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and post-collection data were analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar). For fluorescent imaging experiments, data and images were collected on an Amnis ImageStreamX Mark II, and at least 5000 events per sample were acquired. Data were analyzed using IDEAS software (EMD Millipore) and magnification of ×60 was used for all images shown.
For in vivo experiments, intravascular staining with anti-CD45-BV421 was performed 3 min before killing of the mice, thereby staining all intravascular, but not parenchymal, lymphocytes in order to identify lung resident memory CD8+ T cells as described.62 Mouse spleens and lungs were collected and dissociated by mechanical disruption with GentleMACS Dissociator (spleens or lungs) (Miltenyi Biotec). Single-cell suspensions were stained with antibodies against CD45 (30F11), CD8a (53.6), CD44 (IM7) (all BD Biosciences), and analyzed by flow cytometry. NP-specific CD8+ T cells in lungs and spleens were detected using pentamer staining, cells were incubated with Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I (H-2Db) pentamers specific for influenza virus NP366–374 - PE (H2Db-ASNENMETM) (Proimmune).
Animals and immunizations
Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Lyon, France) were used in all experiments, except for the challenge test, for which 6-week-old female Balb/c mice (Charles River Laboratories, Quebec, Canada) were also used as specified on each case. Animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions, with ad libitum access to food and water. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care ethics committee of the Plateau de Biologie Expérimental de la Souris (CECCAPP_ENS_2015_004) and the Institutional Animal Care Committee of the Center Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CPAC #2013-134), in full accordance with European regulations and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, respectively.
DNA immunizations: to determine the effects of IMX313 and OVX313 on the immunogenicity of NP in plasmids, DNAs (50 µg) in endotoxin-free PBS were administered i.m. into the gastrocnemius muscle on days 0 and 14.
Immunogenicity and dose-response with recombinant proteins: to compare the immunogenicity of the OVX836 protein to that of NP, mice were i.m. immunized twice three weeks apart with 6.25, 12.5, 25, or 50 µg of the respective proteins.
Co-administration of OVX836 and the seasonal influenza vaccine: to determine whether the co-administration of OVX836 protein with IIV vaccines could potentially stimulate both highly specific T-cell responses to NP and increased antibody responses to hemagglutinins present in the seasonal vaccine, groups of female C57BL/6 mice were i.m. immunized twice, 21 days apart with 25 µg of OVX836, with or without IIV (Fluarix®, GSK 2014–2015 formulation, 1.5 µg of each HA in 50 µL). Immunizations were performed by injection into the gastrocnemius muscle or two different muscles (gastrocnemius and calf muscle) for double administration (OVX836 and IIV), with both injections being administered in the same hind limb.
Blood samples were collected before each immunization and 2 weeks or (14 days) after the booster immunization, mice were sacrificed and both serum, lung and splenocytes were collected from each mouse and processed individually.
Mice challenge studies
Influenza challenge studies were conducted at the Infectious Disease Research Centre of the CHU de Quebec and Laval University (Quebec, Canada) and at the Plateau de Biologie Expérimental de la Souris (Lyon, France). Groups of 12 female C57BL/6 or Balb/c mice were immunized in two different muscles of the same hind limb with either 25 µg (in 25 µl) of the OVX836 protein, of the IIV (Fluviral®, GSK 2014–2015 or Influvac®, 1.5 µg of each HA in 50 µL), or a combination of both (OVX836/IIV). Two immunizations (21 days apart) were performed for each group, and a PBS-immunized group was included as control. Three weeks after the second immunization, mice were again lightly anesthetized by isoflurane and infected through an i.n. instillation with 20 µl of a viral suspension, containing either 3LD50 of influenza H1N1 A/California/7/2009, 1LD50 (in Balb/c mice) or 2LD50 (in C57BL/6 mice) of H1N1 A/WSN/33 or 1LD50 of H3N2 A/Victoria/5/72 strain, as indicated in each case. Of note, the H1N1 A/California/7/2009 strain is homologous to the H1N1 strain present in the IIV vaccine, whereas the other two strains used in this study are not. All mice were monitored daily for survival and weight loss during 14 days. Four mice per group were randomly chosen and sacrificed on day 4 (A/California/7/2009 and A/WSN/33) or 5 (A/Victoria/5/72) post-challenge, and their lungs were aseptically removed for the determination of LVTs by standard plaque assay in MDCK cells. Serum samples were collected from each animal before each immunization and viral challenge, as well as on day 21 post-challenge, to evaluate the specific IgG antibody response by HAI assays. Serologic tests were performed against the same virus strains used for the viral challenge, as well as the strains contained in the IIV vaccine (A/California/7/2009 (H1N1), A/Texas/50/2012, and B/Massachusetts/2/2012), following the standard WHO guidelines.63
Ex vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunoSpot (ELISpot) assay
Influenza NP-specific T cells secreting IFN-γ were enumerated using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Mabtech). Lymphocytes were isolated from the spleen and the lung from individual mice. CD4+ T cells were purified by positive selection using a MACS Isolation Kit for mice with CD4 (L3T4). ELISpot plates were coated with the capture mAb (#3321-2 H) then incubated overnight at 4 °C according to the instruction manual of Mabtech. Then, 2 × 105 T cells and CD4+ cells were cultured for 20 h at 37 °C/5% CO2 with 5 µg/mL of recombinant NP protein (OSIVAX). In addition, 2 × 105 T cells were stimulated in similar conditions with 5 µg/mL of the NP366-374 (GenScript) immunodominant peptide epitope in C57BL/6 mice presented by H-2Db to stimulate CD8+ T cells.64 Concavalin A (Sigma) was used as a positive control and unstimulated splenocytes/lung cells were used as negative controls. Spots were counted with an ELISPOT reader system (CTL-ImmunoSpot® S6 Ultra-V). The number of protein- or peptide-reactive cells was represented as spot-forming cells (SFCs) per 2 × 105 cells per well.
Cytokine production by ELISA after in vitro stimulation
For analysis of cytokine secretion, lung cells were cultured (2 × 106 cells/ml) for 48 h with 5 µg/ml peptide NP366-374. Supernatants were collected and cytokine production was measured by sandwich ELISA kit (Mabtech) for IFN-γ (3511-1H), IL-2 (3311-1H), TNFα (3441-1H), and IL-4 (3321-1H) according to the protocols provided by the manufacturer. Cytokine concentrations in pg/ml were quantified using an appropriate standard curve.
Levels of IgG were measured in serum samples collected on days 35. The 96-well ELISA plates were pre-coated with 100 µL of recombinant NP (OSIVAX) at 5 µg/mL overnight at 4 °C. A total of 100 µl of serial twofold dilutions of sera from each group of immunized mice were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 25 °C. Bound antibody was detected with goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Life Technology) and finally, 100 μl of tetramethylbenzidine (Interchim) substrate was added to each well. The antibody levels in serum were expressed as logarithm of endpoint dilution titer and this is defined as the reciprocal of the highest analytic dilution that gives a reading threefold over the mean Optical Density (O.D.) 650 value of the negative-control mice serum at the 1/100 dilution. A value of 1.70 (log) was arbitrarily chosen to illustrate a titer <100.
The plotting of data and statistical analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 software. Statistical significance was determined using the unpaired, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Differences were considered significant if the p-value was p < 0.05. Survival rates of mice were compared using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. For weight loss curves, groups were compared at each day post-infection using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test.
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Belongia, E. A. et al. Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 942–951 (2016).
Xie, H. et al. H3N2 mismatch of 2014–15 northern hemisphere influenza vaccines and head-to-head comparison between human and Ferret antisera derived antigenic maps. Sci. Rep. 5, 15279 (2015).
Flannery, B. et al. Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness-United States, January 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 64, 10–15 (2015). 16.
Chambers, B. S., Parkhouse, K., Ross, T. M., Alby, K. & Hensley, S. E. Identification of hemagglutinin residues responsible for H3N2 antigenic drift during the 2014-2015 influenza season. Cell Rep. 12, 1–6 (2015).
Tricco, A. C. et al. Comparing influenza vaccine efficacy against mismatched and matched strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 11, 153 (2013).
Epstein, S. L. Prior H1N1 influenza infection and susceptibility of Cleveland Family Study participants during the H2N2 pandemic of 1957: an experiment of nature. J. Infect. Dis. 193, 49–53 (2006).
Wang, Z. et al. Recovery from severe H7N9 disease is associated with diverse response mechanisms dominated by CD8+ T cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 6833 (2015).
Sridhar, S. et al. Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza. Nat. Med. 19, 1305–1312 (2013).
Wilkinson, T. M. et al. Preexisting influenza-specific CD4+ T cells correlate with disease protection against influenza challenge in humans. Nat. Med. 18, 274–280 (2012).
Hayward, A. C. et al. Natural T cell-mediated protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza. Results of the Flu Watch Cohort Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 191, 1422–1431 (2015).
Gorman, O. T., Bean, W. J., Kawaoka, Y. & Webster, R. G. Evolution of the nucleoprotein gene of influenza A virus. J. Virol. 64, 1487–1497 (1990).
Machkovech, H. M., Bedford, T., Suchard, M. A. & Bloom, J. D. Positive selection in CD8+ T-cell epitopes of influenza virus nucleoprotein revealed by a comparative analysis of human and swine viral lineages. J. Virol. 89, 11275–11283 (2015).
Hessel, A. et al. MVA vectors expressing conserved influenza proteins protect mice against lethal challenge with H5N1, H9N2 and H7N1 viruses. PLoS ONE 11, e88340 (2014). 9.
Wu, C. et al. Systematic identification of immunodominant CD8+ T-cell responses to influenza A virus in HLA-A2 individuals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9178–9183 (2011).
Grant, E. et al. Nucleoprotein of influenza A virus is a major target of immunodominant CD8+ T-cell responses. Immunol. Cell Biol. 91, 184–194 (2013).
Renfrey, S. & Watts, A. Morphological and biochemical characterization of influenza vaccines commercially available in the United Kingdom. Vaccine 12, 747–752 (1994).
García-Cañas, V., Lorbetskie, B., Bertrand, D., Cyr, T. D. & Girard, M. Selective and quantitative detection of influenza virus proteins in commercial vaccines using two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 79, 3164–3172 (2007).
Mbawuike, I., Zang, Y. & Couch, R. B. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses of humans to inactivated influenza vaccine with or without QS21 adjuvant. Vaccine 25, 3263–3269 (2007).
LaMere, M. et al. Regulation of antinucleoprotein IgG by systemic vaccination and its effect on influenza virus clearance. J. Virol. 85, 5027–5035 (2011).
Rudra, J. S., Tripathi, P. K., Hildeman, D. A., Jung, J. P. & Collier, J. H. Immune responses to coiled coil supramolecular biomaterials. Biomaterials 31, 8475–8483 (2010).
Ogun, S. A., Dumon-Seignovert, L., Marchand, J. B., Holder, A. A. & Hill, F. The oligomerization domain of C4-binding protein (C4bp) acts as an adjuvant, and the fusion protein comprised of the 19-kilodalton merozoite surface protein 1 fused with the murine C4bp domain protects mice against malaria. Infect. Immun. 76, 3817–3823 (2008).
Hofmeyer, T. et al. Arranged sevenfold: structural insights into the C-terminal oligomerization domain of human C4b-binding protein. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 1302–1317 (2013).
Forbes, E. K. et al. T cell responses induced by adenoviral vectored vaccines can be adjuvanted by fusion of antigen to the oligomerization domain of C4b-binding protein. PLoS ONE 7, e44943 (2012).
Spencer, A. J. et al. Fusion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85 A to an oligomerization domain enhances its immunogenicity in both mice and non-human primates. PLoS ONE 7, e33555 (2012).
Spagnoli, G. et al. Broadly neutralizing antiviral responses induced by a single-molecule HPV vaccine based on thermostable thioredoxin-L2 multiepitope nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18177-1 (2017).
Li, Y. et al. Enhancing immunogenicity and transmission-blocking activity of malaria vaccines by fusing Pfs25 to IMX313 multimerization technology. Sci. Rep. 6, 18848 (2016).
Smith, W., Andrewes, C. H. & Laidlaw, P. P. A virus obtained from influenza patients. Lancet 222, 66–68 (1933).
Gallagher, J. R., Torian, U., McCraw, D. M. & Harris, A. K. Structural studies of influenza virus RNPs by electron microscopy indicate molecular contortions within NP supra-structures. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 294–307 (2017).
Ye, Q., Krug, R. M. & Tao, Y. J. The mechanism by which influenza A virus nucleoprotein forms oligomers and binds RNA. Nature 21, 1078–1082 (2006).
Naik, S. H. et al. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8+ and CD8− dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. J. Immunol. 1, 6592–6597 (2005).
World Health Organization. Influenza WHO fact sheet no. 211. at https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/, Geneva, Switzerland (2009).
Berthoud, T. K. et al. Potent CD8+ T-cell immunogenicity in humans of a novel heterosubtypic influenza A vaccine, MVA-NP + M1. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1, 1–7 (2011). 52.
Thomas, P. G., Keating, R., Hulse-Post, D. J. & Doherty, P. C. Cell-mediated protection in influenza infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 48–54 (2006).
Gilbert, S. C. Advances in the development of universal influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir. Virus. 7, 750–758 (2013).
Nachbagauer, R. & Krammer, F. Universal influenza virus vaccines and therapeutic antibodies. Clin. Microbiol Infect. 23, 222–228 (2017).
Fiore, A. E. et al. Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 59, 1–62 (2010).
Usonis, V. et al. Central European Vaccination Advisory Group (CEVAG) guidance statement on recommendations for influenza vaccination in children. BMC Infect. Dis. 10, 168 (2010).
Bodewes, R. et al. Vaccination against human influenza A/H3N2 virus prevents the induction of heterosubtypic immunity against lethal infection with avian influenza A/H5N1 virus. PLoS ONE 4, e5538 (2009).
Ulmer, J. B. et al. Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science 259, 1745–1749 (1993).
Ulmer, J. B. et al. Protective CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against influenza virus induced by vaccination with nucleoprotein DNA. J. Virol. 72, 5648–5653 (1998).
Fu, T. M. et al. Dose dependence of CTL precursor frequency induced by a DNA vaccine and correlation with protective immunity against influenza virus challenge. J. Immunol. 162, 4163–4170 (1999).
Epstein, S. L. et al. DNA vaccine expressing conserved influenza virus proteins protective against H5N1 challenge infection in mice. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8, 796–801 (2002).
Epstein, S. L. & Price, G. E. Cross-protective immunity to influenza A viruses. Expert Rev. Vaccin. 9, 1325–1341 (2010).
Rangel-Moreno, J. et al. B cells promote resistance to heterosubtypic strains of influenza via multiple mechanisms. J. Immunol. 1, 454–463 (2008).
Wraith, D. C., Vessey, A. E. & Askonas, B. A. Purified influenza virus nucleoprotein protects mice from lethal infection. J. Gen. Virol. 68, 433–440 (1987).
Wraith, D. C. & Askonas, B. A. Induction of influenza A virus cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells by a nucleoprotein/haemagglutinin preparation. J. Gen. Virol. 66, 1327–1331 (1985).
Guo, L. et al. Protection against multiple influenza A virus subtypes by intranasal administration of recombinant nucleoprotein. Arch. Virol. 155, 1765–1775 (2010).
Epstein, S. L. et al. Protection against multiple influenza A subtypes by vaccination with highly conserved nucleoprotein. Vaccine 23, 5404–5410 (2005).
Huang, B. et al. Influenza A virus nucleoprotein derived from Escherichia coli or recombinant vaccinia (Tiantan) virus elicits robust cross-protection in mice. Virol. J. 9, 322 (2012).
Zheng, M. et al. Cross-protection against influenza virus infection by intranasal administration of nucleoprotein based vaccine with compound 48/80 adjuvant. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 11, 397–406 (2015).
Hutchings, C. L., Gilbert, S. C., Hill, A. V. & Moore, A. C. Novel protein and poxvirus-based vaccine combinations for simultaneous induction of humoral and cell-mediated immunity. J. Immunol. 175, 599–606 (2005).
Kreijtz, J. H. et al. MVA-based H5N1 vaccine affords cross-clade protection in mice against influenza A/H5N1 viruses at low doses and after single immunization. PLoS ONE 4, e7790 (2009).
Lambe, T. et al. T-cell responses in children to internal influenza antigens, 1 year after immunization with pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine, and response to revaccination with seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 31, 86–91 (2012).
Hillaire, M. L., Osterhaus, A. D. & Rimmelzwaan, G. F. Induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes as a basis for the development of broadly protective influenza vaccines. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 939860 (2011).
Antrobus, R. D. et al. Clinical assessment of a novel recombinant simian adenovirus ChAdOx1 as a vectored vaccine expressing conserved influenza A antigens. Mol. Ther. 22, 668–674 (2014).
Lambe, T. et al. Immunity against heterosubtypic influenza virus induced by adenovirus and MVA expressing nucleoprotein and matrix protein-1. Sci. Rep. 3, 1443 (2013).
Su, F., Patela, G. B., Hua, S. & Chen, W. Induction of mucosal immunity through systemic immunization: phantom or reality? Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 12, 1070–1079 (2016).
Babar, M. M. & Zaidi, N. U. Protein sequence conservation and stable molecular evolution reveals influenza virus nucleoprotein as a universal druggable target. Infect. Genet Evol. 34, 200–210 (2015).
Luo, M. et al. Immunization with plasmid DNA encoding influenza A virus nucleoprotein fused to a tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence elicits strong immune responses and protection against H5N1 challenge in mice. J. Virol. Methods 154, 121–127 (2008).
Fodor, E. et al. Rescue of influenza A virus from recombinant DNA. J. Virol. 73, 9679–9682 (1999).
de Brito, C. et al. CpG promotes cross-presentation of dead cell-associated antigens by pre-CD8α + dendritic cells [corrected]. J. Immunol. 186, 1503–1511 (2011).
Brinza, L. et al. Immune signatures of protective spleen memory CD8 T cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 37651 (2016).
WHO Global Influenza Surveillance Network. « Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza ». http://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/manual_diagnosis_surveillance_influenza/en/ (2011).
Townsend, A. R. et al. The epitopes of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be defined with short synthetic peptides. Cell 28, 959–968 (1986).
We are grateful to Drs Tim Mosmann, Andrew McMichael, Jeff Almond, Behazine Combadiere, and Nathalie Garçon for comments on the manuscript and the work in progress. We thank Dr Christian Pradeyrol for long-term support of the “313” project. We acknowledge the contribution of SFR BioSciences (UMS3444-CNRS/US8-INSERM ENSL, UCBL) facilities (AniRA-Cytométrie, AniRA-PBES). This work was supported in part by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through the project OPTIVAC.
J.d.C. and F.H. are named as inventors on a family of patents/patent applications “Influenza Nucleoprotein vaccines” (WO 2014/090905, WO 2014/147087), and both are shareholders and employees of OSIVAX. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Del Campo, J., Pizzorno, A., Djebali, S. et al. OVX836 a recombinant nucleoprotein vaccine inducing cellular responses and protective efficacy against multiple influenza A subtypes. npj Vaccines 4, 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-019-0098-4