Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Protection against inhalation anthrax by immunization with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Ty21a stably producing protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis


The national blueprint for biodefense concluded that the United States is underprepared for biological threats. The licensed anthrax vaccine absorbed vaccine, BioThrax, requires administration of at least 3–5 intramuscular doses. The anthrax vaccine absorbed vaccine consists of complex cell-free culture filtrates of a toxigenic Bacillus anthracis strain and causes tenderness at the injection site and significant adverse events. We integrated a codon-optimized, protective antigen gene of B. anthracis (plus extracellular secretion machinery), into the chromosome of the licensed, oral, live-attenuated typhoid fever vaccineTy21a to form Ty21a-PA-01 and demonstrated excellent expression of the gene encoding protective antigen. We produced the vaccine in a 10-L fermenter; foam-dried and vialed it, and characterized the dried product. The vaccine retained ~50% viability for 20 months at ambient temperature. Sera from animals immunized by the intraperitoneal route had high levels of anti-protective antigen antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and anthrax lethal toxin-neutralizing activity. Immunized mice were fully protected against intranasal challenge with ~5 LD50 of B. anthracis Sterne spores, and 70% (7/10) of vaccinated rabbits were protected against aerosol challenge with 200 LD50 of B. anthracis Ames spores. There was a significant correlation between protection and antibody levels determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and toxin-neutralizing activity. These data provide the foundation for achievement of our ultimate goal, which is to develop an oral anthrax vaccine that is stable at ambient temperatures and induces the rapid onset of durable, high-level protection after a 1-week immunization regimen.


A bipartisan blue ribbon panel on biodefense recently concluded that the United States is not prepared for a biological attack, and urges that new advances in scientific technology and new biodefense vaccines be developed to prevent mass casualties in the future due to bioterrorism attacks.1, 2 Anthrax is caused by the spore-forming bacterium, Bacillus anthracis. When anthrax spores are transmitted by the respiratory route, inhalation anthrax rapidly progresses to a septic shock-type syndrome with a high case-fatality rate if antibiotic treatment is delayed.3, 4 Anthrax spores are physically stable and can be readily processed into an easily distributable and inhalable powder. B. anthracis is on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention list of Tier-1bioterrorism agents.5

The primary virulence factors of B. anthracis include the poly-D-glutamate capsule, and three toxin subunits, namely protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF) that form two binary toxins. Lethal toxin (LT) is composed of PA and LF, and edema toxin (ET) consists of PA and EF.6 PA binds to host cell receptors, is enzymatically processed and oligomerizes, and then forms a molecular pore that selectively allows for the translocation of EF and LF into the cytosol7,8,9 to manifest their effects in the host cells.

Neutralizing antibodies against PA alone protect humans, rabbits, and non-human primates against anthrax,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and form the basis of the current US-licensed AVA vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed, BioThrax) and UK-licensed AVP vaccine (anthrax vaccine precipitated). The AVA vaccine is an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed, PA-containing culture filtrate prepared from a non-encapsulated, toxinogenic strain of B. anthracis (V770-NP1-R). For pre-exposure prophylaxis, AVA is administered intramuscularly in five doses at 0, 1, 6, 12 and 18 months, with annual boosting.21 A shortened regimen of two doses did not completely eliminate spores in a non-human primate spore challenge model.22 Due to the prolonged immunization regimen, this is not an optimal vaccine for pre-exposure prophylaxis, or for post-exposure therapy. Moreover, it is difficult to achieve high levels of compliance in large populations, due to the prolonged dosing schedule and reactogenicity. Currently, the stockpiling of sufficient AVA for emergency use is a challenge, because of its relatively short 4-year shelf life and its requirement for storage at 2–8 °C.21 Thus, various expression systems, immunogens, adjuvants, and delivery vehicles have been explored in efforts to develop alternative anthrax vaccines.10, 23,24,25,26,27,28

Live attenuated Salmonella spp. have been an attractive alternate platform for constructing an anthrax vaccine. Such a vaccine can be self-administered orally. Immunization by the oral route elicits both mucosal and systemic immune responses. Moreover, Salmonella vaccines can stimulate both humoral and cellular immune responses. Previously published studies using attenuated S. Typhimurium29,30,31,32 or S. Typhi33,34,35,36 expressing PA to immunize mice or non-human primates, either alone or together with a boost of recombinant PA, demonstrated excellent immunogenicity or accelerated immune response in the case of priming, and protection against inhalation anthrax. Among these Salmonella expression platforms, Ty21a (Vivotif) has the unique advantage that it is one of the only licensed oral, live-attenuated bacterial vaccine strains. For preventing typhoid fever, Ty21a is administered during 1 week and protects humans for at least 7 years,37, 38 and has an unrivaled safety record over a period of 25 years.38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45 There has never been a reported case of bacteremic dissemination of Ty21 after administration to more than 200 million recipients.46 Further, there are no reports of post-vaccination inflammatory arthritis (e.g., Reiter’s syndrome) with Ty21a, a potential problem with other live attenuated vectors including nontyphoid Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia.47 Ty21a can be foam-dried, which provides temperature stabilization and a potential shelf life of 5–10 years,48 and Ty21a has been shown to be an excellent candidate vector for foreign antigen delivery, including PA.34,35,36

Most of the previously reported proof-of-concept studies expressed PA from a plasmid,30, 32,33,34,35,36 which is an unstable expression technology due to plasmid loss and consequential loss of antigen expression. A prior study in animals inferred that even a stabilized plasmid can be lost once the bacterium is administered to humans.35 We stably integrated the gene encoding PA into Ty21a creating a vaccine strain Ty21a-PA-01, which we foam-dried, used it to immunize mice and rabbits by the intraperitoneal route (IP) and showed protection against lethal doses of inhaled B. anthracis Sterne and Ames spores.


Recombineering of the gene encoding PA (stable integration)

Previously, it was demonstrated that Ty21a carrying a plasmid expressing a codon-optimized, proteolysis-resistant PA that was mutated at the furin and chymotrypsin cleavage sites, fused to the hlyA secretion signal and the hlyB-D extracellular secretion apparatus, and controlled by an optimized constitutive lpp promoter, was immunogenic and protective in mice.34 Compared with native PA,29, 30, 33, 35, 36 this form of PA provided an extra level of safety, as N-terminal processing of PA is required for toxin activation and PA multimeric pore formation.49 However, this plasmid was unstable.34 Therefore, the PA expression cassette was recombinationally inserted into the silent Vi gene region of Ty21a.50 The selectable marker was then deleted from the insert, resulting in a final, markerless chromosomal integrant. Previous assessments of Ty21a carrying the cloned PA encoding gene on a plasmid showed that, although the strain expressed and produced high levels of PA, the plasmid was unstable in the absence of antibiotic selection. Only 5% of Ty21a cells retained the plasmid after 25 generations of growth.34 In contrast, the chromosomally integrated clone was confirmed to be 100% genetically stable for high levels of PA production after >100 generations of growth (colony immunoblot and western blot). This clone was designated Ty21a-PA-01.

Seed bank generation and characterization of the recombinant S. Typhi Ty21a

We generated a seed bank designated as SB 02APR2013 Ty21a-PA-01. Characterization of this seed bank demonstrated that all microbiological, immunological, phenotypic, and genetic properties were as expected (Table 1). The integrity of the 6,130 bp PA expression cassette antigenic insert was verified by DNA sequencing. Furthermore, the expected chromosomal insertion location at the tviE locus was verified by sequencing.

Table 1 Characterization of Ty21a-PA-01 seed bank

Ty21a-PA-01 was subjected to growth in a bioreactor using CY medium at 5–10 L scales. The pH was maintained between 7–8.3, because in preliminary studies it provided the best stability.51 We routinely achieve growth characteristics of ~1 × 1010 CFU/mL (final OD600nm ~ 9.0).

Foam-drying and stability

To achieve optimization of foam drying, several different foam-drying protective agents (FPAs) in various combinations and concentrations were evaluated for the effect on dried cell viability and residual water content, an indicator of long-term survivability. Foam-dried product, obtained with an optimized FPA formulation, was subjected to a temperature stability analysis at 4 °C, ambient temperature (20–25 °C), and 37 °C over a period of 20 months (Table 2). To date, foam-dried Ty21a-PA-01 has been stable at 4 °C and ambient temperature for 20 months (Table 2). This foam-dried product showed viability profiles (Table 2) and water content (~5–6% throughout the study period) comparable to those previously reported when foam-drying of Ty21a resulted in a temperature-stabilized formulation that survived at acceptable levels at 25 °C for 12 months and had a predicted shelf life of 5–10 years at 4 °C.48

Table 2 Stability characteristics of foam-dried Ty21a-PA-01

Antibody responses in mice

Sera from immunized mice were collected 2 weeks after dose 3 (time of challenge) and assessed for antibodies to PA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 1a), and toxin-neutralizing activity (TNA) (Fig. 1b). For mice immunized with Ty21a-PA-01, the geometric mean OD 1.0 (serum dilution at which the optical density was 1.0) of anti-PA antibodies was 14,169 (range 518 - 263,960). The geometric mean TNA titer (serum dilution at which 50% of J774.1 cells were killed) was 9,942 (range 800–45,258). The control group immunized with Ty21a had a geometric mean OD 1.0 in the anti-PA ELISA of 2 (range 1–13) and a TNA titer of <1 in all mice. The difference in antibody responses between the immunized and controls groups was statistically significant (p = 1.1 × 10−5 and 8.2 × 10−6 for ELISA and TNA, respectively, Mann–Whitney U test, two-tailed).

Fig. 1

Antibodies in mice immunized with Ty21a-PA01. Mice were vaccinated with 5 × 107 CFU of Ty21a (triangles) or Ty21a-PA-01 (squares) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection at 2-week intervals. Sera collected at 2 weeks after dose 3 were assayed for anti-PA IgG by ELISA (a) and anthrax toxin neutralization activity (TNA) (b). Antibody responses by ELISA are reported as the serum dilution at which the optical density was 1.0 (OD 1.0), and TNA titers as the last serum dilution at which there was 50% protective activity against killing of macrophages (J774A.1) by LT. Filled symbols represent mice that were not protected in the spore challenge study and open symbols represent those that were protected (see Fig. 3). The geometric mean of each group is shown as a horizontal line. Antibody responses between the two groups were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test (p = 1.1 × 10−5 and 8.2 × 10−6 for ELISA and TNA, respectively)

Antibody responses in rabbits

In immunized rabbits, sera were collected 2 weeks after dose 4 of the vaccine and assessed for antibodies to PA by ELISA (Fig. 2a), TNA (Fig. 2b), and S. Typhi lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (9 and 12 O antigens) by ELISA (Fig. 2c). For rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01, the geometric mean OD 1.0 of anti-PA antibodies by ELISA was 32,887 (range 9,029–101,360). The geometric mean TNA titer was 1,158 (range 383–4,812). The control group of rabbits immunized with Ty21a had a geometric mean OD 1.0 in the anti-PA ELISA of <1 in all rabbits and a TNA titer of <1 in all rabbits. Rabbits immunized with Ty21a control or Ty21a-PA-01 produced similar levels of anti-S. Typhi LPS IgG antibodies (Fig. 2c). The geometric mean OD 1.0 by ELISA was 11,198 (range 2,970–123,520) for rabbits immunized with Ty21a control and 12,159 (range 953–58,140) for rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01. The anti-PA antibody responses between the controls (Ty21a) and experimental (Ty21a-PA-01) groups were significantly different (p = 6.39 × 10−5 and 6.39 × 10−5 for ELISA and TNA, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between anti-S. Typhi LPS antibody responses in the control and experimental groups (p = 0.53).

Fig. 2

Antibodies in rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01. Rabbits were vaccinated with 1 × 109 CFU of Ty21a (triangles) or Ty21a-PA-01 (squares) by IP injection at 4-week intervals. Sera collected 2 weeks after dose 4 were assayed for anti-PA IgG by ELISA (a), anthrax toxin neutralization activity (TNA) (b), and anti-S. Typhi LPS IgG by ELISA (c). Filled symbols represent rabbits that were not protected in the spore challenge study and open symbols represent those that were protected (see Fig. 4). Geometric mean of each group is shown as a horizontal line. Anti-PA responses by ELISA and TNA responses, but not anti-S. Typhi LPS responses by ELISA, were significantly higher in the immunized as compared to control rabbits (p = 6.39 × 10−5, 6.39 × 10−5, and 0.53, respectively, by Mann–Whitney U Test). The geometric mean OD 1.0 of anti-PA antibodies by ELISA was 47,268 for the seven protected rabbits as compared to 14,107 for the three unprotected rabbits (p = 0.0167, Mann–Whitney U test). Likewise, the geometric mean TNA titer was 1,741 for the protected rabbits and 447 for the unprotected animals (p = 0.0167)

Protective efficacy in mice

We challenged mice, immunized with Ty21a or Ty21a-PA-01, two weeks after dose 3 with five LD50 of Sterne spores by intranasal instillation. All of the animals (20/20) immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 and 1/10 control mice immunized with Ty21a survived (p = 2.2 × 10−8, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed) and remained healthy throughout the 21-day monitoring period (Fig. 3). The mean time to death (TTD) in the control mice was 4.2 ± 0.1 (mean ± SD) days.

Fig. 3

Ty21a-PA-01 protects mice from lethal spore challenge. Mice were immunized three times with 5 × 107 CFU of Ty21a control (filled triangles) or Ty21a-PA-01 (open squares) by the IP route and were challenged two weeks after dose 3 with Sterne spores at a dose of 4.9 LD50 by intranasal installation and monitored twice daily for 21 days. Mean time to death (TTD) was calculated for the controls. As noted, 1 of 10 control mice immunized with Ty21a and 20/20 mice immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 survived (p = 2.2 × 10−8, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed). For the nine control mice that died, the mean TTD was 4.2 ± 0.1 (mean ± SD) days

Protective efficacy in rabbits

We challenged rabbits that had been immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 or Ty21a, 2 weeks after dose 4 with 200 LD50 of spores from the fully virulent Ames strain by aerosol administration to the lungs. Seven of ten rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 and none of ten control rabbits immunized with Ty21a survived (p = 0.0031, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed) (Fig. 4). All 7 surviving rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 remained healthy throughout the 21-day monitoring period. The ten control rabbits died in 1.8 ± 0.4 days and the mean TTD for the three Ty21a-PA-01-immunized rabbits that died was 3.2 ± 1 days, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.039, Mann–Whitney U test, two-tailed). All rabbits with a TNA titer > 825 and an anti-PA ELISA OD 1.0 titer > 24,651 survived (Fig. 2a and b). The three rabbits that were immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 and died had the lowest levels of LT neutralizing antibodies by TNA (Fig. 2b) and by anti-PA ELISA (Fig. 2a), but not against S. Typhi LPS (Fig. 2c). The geometric mean OD 1.0 of anti-PA antibodies by ELISA was 47,268 for the seven protected rabbits as compared to 14,107 for the three unprotected rabbits (p = 0.0167, Mann–Whitney U test, two-tailed). Likewise, the geometric mean TNA titer was 1,741 for the protected rabbits and 447 for the unprotected animals (p = 0.0167).

Fig. 4

Ty21a-PA-01 protects rabbits from a high dose lethal Ames spore challenge. Rabbits were immunized with 1 × 109 CFU of Ty21a control (filled triangles) or Ty21a-PA-01 (open squares) by the IP route four times at 4-week intervals. Two weeks after dose 4, rabbits were challenged with aerosolized Ames spores at a dose of 200 LD50 and monitored twice daily for 21 days. Mean TTD was calculated. None of ten control rabbits immunized with Ty21a survived; however, 7/10 rabbits immunized with Ty21a-PA-01 survived (p = 0.0031, Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed). All 10 control rabbits died in 1.8 ± 0.4 days, and the mean TTD for the 3 immunized rabbits that died was 3.2 ± 1 days (p = 0.039by Mann–Whitney U test, two-tailed)


Our goal is to develop a well-tolerated, safe, highly protective anthrax vaccine that is stable at ambient temperatures and administered orally during 5–7 days in 3–4 doses. To achieve this goal, we have developed a recombinant live whole organism Ty21a attenuated typhoid vaccine stably expressing the B. anthracis PA gene, designated Ty21a-PA-01, by integrating the PA gene into the Ty21a chromosome.Ty21a-PA-01 is an advance over the previously reported protective Ty21a vaccine that expressed the PA gene via a plasmid, which is an unstable expression technology.34,35,36

We are the first to foam dry and vial a live bacterium expressing PA as an anthrax vaccine. We showed immunogenicity and protective efficacy of this foam dried and vialed product in mice and rabbits. Unlike some of the previously published reports,33, 35 Ty21a-PA-01 did not require a recombinant protein boost to achieve high levels of protection.

The virulence of B. anthracis is due to its toxins and a poly-D-glutamic acid capsule that is responsible for bacterial dissemination. A/J inbred mice are susceptible to death by exposure to B. anthracis strains producing capsule alone, regardless of the presence of toxins.52 To correlate the levels of anti-PA after immunization withTy21a-PA-01with protection against B. anthracis, we used the toxigenic, non-capsulated B. anthracis Sterne strain to challenge immunized mice.10 We found that protection against the Sterne strain correlated with anti-PA response. When administered to mice by IP injection, Ty21a-PA-01 was highly immunogenic, and protected 100% of the mice against a lethal nasal Sterne spore challenge dose.

We next immunized NZW rabbits, since they are considered to be a more stringent model of inhalation anthrax than mice. Using 200 LD50 of encapsulated, fully virulent Ames spores, 70%of the rabbits were protected (Fig. 4).

All of the rabbits developed antibodies to PA and exhibited significant toxin neutralizing activity. However, the three unprotected rabbits had the lowest levels of antibodies to PA and the lowest TNA titers (Fig. 2). There appeared to be a threshold level of antibodies required for complete protection. We infer that because Ty21a-PA-01 and Ty21a induced similar titers of anti-Salmonella O antigen (Fig. 2c), the protective efficacy of Ty21a-PA-01 against Salmonella Typhi will be equivalent to that provided by Ty21a. Thus, we argue that Ty21a-PA-01 can be developed as a bivalent vaccine against both typhoid fever and anthrax.

The immunization regimen in this study served as a proof-of-concept, and was not optimized. It may be possible to achieve 100% protection in rabbits by altering the dose of vaccine and/or spacing of doses to increase the level of protective anti-PA titers among low responding rabbits. Our next major step will be to assess immunogenicity and protective efficacy of Ty21a-PA-01 in non-human primates such as rhesus macaques.53 However, our goal is to immunize humans orally. Since S. Typhi (e.g. Ty21a) does not infect animals, there is no oral animal model available for Ty21a. That is why we immunized animals by the IP route. We also observed that in mice, a weeklong IP immunization regimen was inferior to immunizing IP at 2-week dosing intervals. Such data in animals have been and will continue to be important in vaccine development. However, because S. Typhi (e.g., Ty21a) does not infect animals, we cannot confidently extrapolate any results in animals to humans. Thus, we argue that human clinical trials are needed to adequately assess this vaccine.

With that in mind, we are first working to increase the potency of the vaccine by increasing the numbers of administered Ty21a-PA-01 bacteria that successfully reach the ileum where they are thought to invade M cells and induce protective immunity. One method to achieve this is to protect the vaccine from the low pH of gastric acidity by integrating acid stabilization genes into it. We have done this successfully with a Ty21a-Shigella sonnei O-antigen bivalent vaccine,54, 55 and intend to do so for Ty21a-PA-01.

We will then manufacture a master cell bank (MCB) in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, and use the MCB to manufacture and foam dry the vaccine. In our current study, > 40% of original viable counts (CFU/mg) remained after 20 months storage of foam-dried product at 20–25 °C (ambient temperature), and there was no significant loss of viability when Ty21a-PA-01 was stored at 4 °C over our study period of 20 months (Table 2). We anticipate this vaccine may have a shelf life of 5–10 years at 4 °C and at least 12 months at ambient temperatures. In comparison, lyophilized Ty21a (Vivotif) lost 0.5log10 of titer during 1 week at 25 °C.48 These findings support the option to administer vaccine at ambient temperature during mass administration campaigns. Providing high-risk populations with a temperature stable vaccine for use by self-administration is also being considered.

The US Departments of Defense and Health and Human Services have spent enormous amounts of funds during the past decade to purchase and stockpile injectable anthrax vaccines that induce anti-PA protective antibodies after many months of immunization. We believe that in the event of a major disaster, our temperature-stabilized oral vaccine could be used for mass immunization of civilian, military, first-responders and medical personnel, and other vulnerable individuals of the population in a week-long immunization regimen, like the regimen used for Ty21a56 against typhoid fever.

Ty21a is safe and well tolerated when given orally over a 7-day immunization regimen, and protects humans against typhoid fever for at least 7 years.38, 40 We anticipate similar durable protection against both anthrax and typhoid fever with Ty21a-PA-01 in humans. From a broader perspective, we aim to use rTy21a to express multiple, stably integrated and expressed foreign antigens and establish rTy21a as a platform technology for creating orally administered vaccines against multiple pathogens that are stable at room temperature.55

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and cell lines

Ty21a was commercially purchased (Vivotif, Crucell, Miami Lakes, FL). A seed bank was made in CY medium (1.2% yeast extract, 2% Hy-Case, 1.2% pepticase, 0.125% NaH2PO4, 0.33% NaCl, pH 7.2, 0.2% glucose, and 0.005% galactose), which is currently utilized for Vivotif production.46 Spores of B. anthracis Sterne strain were purchased (Colorado Serum Co. Denver, CO) and washed free of saponin in sterile water, before quantitating by serial dilution and plating on 5% sheep blood agar plates. Spores of B. anthracis Ames strain were prepared in a 10 L bioreactor at pH 7.0 using modified Schaeffer’s Medium in a BSL-3 Enhanced facility within the Galveston National Laboratory, UTMB, purified aseptically by washing in sterile molecular grade water, and then by density gradient centrifugation in 58% MD-76 (Mallinckrodt, Inc., St. Louis, MO). The spores had a germination index of 1.0 and 99.9% optical refractility as determined by phase contrast microscopy. The purified spores were stored in 1% phenol and 0.05% Tween 20 at 4 °C. Mouse macrophage cell line J774A.1 was purchased, maintained and grown as specified (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA).

Construction of Ty21a-PA-01

A codon optimized gene for PA fused to the Hly (hemolysin) secretion machinery under the lipoprotein gene (lpp) promoter from plasmid pLpp-PAop-hlyAs 34 was subcloned into pMD-TV,50 resulting in a recombinant plasmid L52. L52 was the template DNA for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification; resulting in a product containing the 3′ ~500 bp of tviD gene (encoding Vi polysaccharide biosynthesis protein of S. Typhi), a flippase-recognization target site-flanked kanamycin resistance cassette (Kanr, 1,393 bp), the PA expression cassette (6,130 bp), and ~1000 bp of the vexA gene (encoding Vi polysaccharide export protein of S. Typhi). The PCR fragment was integrated into the Ty21a chromosome using the λ Red recombination-based recombineering technology.50, 57 The Kanr selectable marker was deleted from the chromosomal integrants by transforming cells with plasmid pCP20 and selecting for Kans transformants as described.50, 58 Chromosomal integration and selection marker eviction were confirmed by genomic PCR analysis. We confirmed production of PA by western blot analysis.

Seed bank generation and characterization

Ty21a-PA-01 was grown in CY medium at 37 °C, as described for Vivotif,46 with aeration to late log phase. A seed bank of 200, 1-mL vials was produced and maintained at −80 °C. Two vials were chosen randomly, and characterized by microbiological, immunological, phenotypic analyses, and rDNA sequencing for strain identification (Table 1). The integrity of the 6,130 bp antigenic insert and the entire genome was confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Production of extracellularly secreted PA in culture supernatants and agar-grown colonies was confirmed by western blot analysis using mouse monoclonal anti-PA antibody (Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX), as described.34

Manufacturing of foam-dried vaccine

Ty21a-PA-01 was grown in CY medium supplemented with 0.02% galactose to early stationary phase.46 The organisms were harvested, resuspended in CY medium, and mixed 1:1 with a 2× FPA cocktail in CY medium to achieve a final concentration of 25% trehalose (w/w), 5% gelatin (w/w), 0.5% methionine (w/w), and 0.34% potassium phosphate, pH 8.0. Five mL aliquots of the Ty21a-FPA formulation were dispensed into 100-mL Schott vials (Allergy Laboratories, Oklahoma City, OK). Foam drying was performed using a Virtis Advantage XL-70 lyophilizer with the following program: Decreasing pressure from 760 Torr to 80 Torr over 15 min at 10 °C, holding at 80 Torr for 45 min, decreasing pressure to 5 Torr over 20 min, and a further decrease to 1 Torr at 22 °C with holding for 2 h and further reduction in pressure to < 100 m Torr and holding at 15 °C for 48 h. Stoppering was performed in the lyophilizer after argon purging. Residual water content was determined using the Karl Fischer method on a Mettler–Toledo Stromboli balance.

Stability of foam-dried vaccine

Foam-dried vaccine was stored at 4 °C, ambient temperature, and 37 °C, with calibrated incubator temperatures ranging between 2–8, 20–25, and 36–38 °C, respectively. At indicated time points, a sample was removed for assessment that included viable counts and residual water content. Viable counts were performed by reconstituting foam dried material in an equivalent volume of sterile water to the original pre-foam dried state (mL/mg) and quantitated by plating on tryptic soy agar and scoring for colony forming units (CFU)/mg in the foam dried product after overnight incubation at 37 °C.

Animal immunization

All animal experiments were performed according to guidelines in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH, Bethesda). Sterne strain-susceptible female A/J mice, 6–8 weeks old, and female New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits, ~6 weeks old (1.4–1.8 kg), were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and Harlan Laboratories (Houston, TX), respectively, and maintained at Bioqual (Rockville, MD). They were immunized and assessed according to a protocol approved by the Bioqual Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee. Twenty mice were immunized by the IP route three times at 2-week intervals with 5 × 107 CFU of Ty21a-PA-01 in 0.5 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Ten control mice received 5 × 107 CFU of Ty21a IP in the same volume and regimen. Ten rabbits were immunized IP 4 times at 4-week intervals with 1 × 109 CFU of Ty21a-PA-01 or Ty21a in 1.0 mL of PBS. The Ty21a-PA-01 used for animal immunizations had been foam-dried and stored at 4 °C for 3 months prior to the mouse and 15 months prior to the rabbit studies.

Antibody assessment

Recombinant proteins (rPA and rLF) were obtained from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI, Manassas, VA) or purchased from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). Antibody titers against PA were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plates were coated with rPA at 2.0 ng/µL in a volume of 50 μL/well and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Plates were then washed three times with 1 × wash solution (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD), and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (KPL) containing 1% non-fat dry milk for 1 h at 37 °C. Serially diluted samples were added, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and washed as before. Alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG (KPL) were added at 0.2 ng/µL, plates incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, washed, and developed with Phosphatase substrate (KPL). Data were collected using Softmax 5.0, and fit to a 4-parameter logistic curve. Results were reported as the serum dilution at which the optical density was 1.0 (OD 1.0).

The lethal toxin-neutralizing assay (TNA) titer was determined as described34 except J774A.1 murine macrophage cells were used. Briefly, the serially diluted sera were pre-incubated with toxin mixture (PA and LF at 5:4 ratio) at 37 °C for 30 min before adding to J774A.1 cells in 96-well plates. Subsequently, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, ATCC), 25 µL/well, was added to the cells followed by 1 h of incubation before addition of 100 µL/well of the solubilizing buffer to lyse macrophages. After 10 min, the OD562 was read. The toxin neutralizing titer was defined as serum dilution at which 50% of macrophages were killed.

Sterne spore challenge of A/J mice

Mice were shipped to UTMB after all immunizations. The LD50 for Sterne spores was determined in naïve mice of similar age and body weight. All mice were challenged 2 weeks after vaccine dose 3 with an intended target of 5 LD50 of B. anthracis Sterne spores by nasal instillation. Mice were anesthetized by isoflurane and suspended vertically using monofilament fishing line looped behind the upper incisors and connected to a vertical support platform. An aliquot (20 μL) containing the desired number of spores was placed at the anterior of each naris, and the animals were allowed to inhale the spores for 2–3 min. Then, 10 μL sterile PBS was instilled to wash any non-adherent spores from the nasal cavity into the lungs. Each mouse was calculated to have received 2.8 × 105 spores, corresponding to 4.9 LD50. Survival was monitored twice daily for 21 days.

Ames spore challenge of New Zealand white rabbits

Rabbits were shipped to UTMB after the third immunization at Bioqual. The fourth immunization was administered at UTMB. The LD50 for Ames spores was determined in naïve rabbits of similar age and body weight. Two weeks after vaccine dose 4, rabbits were randomly placed into four groups for whole body Ames spore aerosol challenge. The nebulizer for each aerosol run contained a suspension of B. anthracis Ames spores (3.5 × 109 CFU/mL), and the mean Sf (spray factor) of the four aerosol runs was 3.9 × 10−7 ± 2 × 10−6. The presented lung dose/rabbit was based on aerosol sampling during aerosolization and calculated to be 2.0 × 107 CFU of B. anthracis Ames spores/animal, corresponding to 200 LD50. Survival was monitored twice daily for 21 days.

Data availability statement

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study, including its supplementary information files, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense. Biodefense Indicators: One Year Later, Events Outpacing Federal Efforts to Defend the Nation. (2016).

  2. 2.

    De Groot, A. S., Moise, L., Olive, D., Einck, L. & Martin, W. Agility in adversity: vaccines on Demand. Expert. Rev. Vaccines 15, 1087–1091 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Meselson, M. et al. The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. Science 266, 1202–1208 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Inglesby, T. V. et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. JAMA 287, 2236–2252 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Select Agents and Toxins List. Select Agents and Toxins List (2014).

  6. 6.

    Moayeri, M. & Leppla, S. H. The roles of anthrax toxin in pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7, 19–24 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brossier, F. & Mock, M. Toxins of Bacillus anthracis. Toxicon 39, 1747–1755 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bann, J. G. & Hultgren, S. J. Structural biology: anthrax hijacks host receptor. Nature 430, 843–844 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kintzer, A. F., Sterling, H. J., Tang, I. I., Williams, E. R. & Krantz, B. A. Anthrax toxin receptor drives protective antigen oligomerization and stabilizes the heptameric and octameric oligomer by a similar mechanism. PLoS One 5, e13888 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Welkos, S. L. & Friedlander, A. M. Comparative safety and efficacy against Bacillus anthracis of protective antigen and live vaccines in mice. Microb. Pathog. 5, 127–139 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Turnbull, P. C. Anthrax vaccines: past, present and future. Vaccine 9, 533–539 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ivins, B. E. et al. Comparative efficacy of experimental anthrax vaccine candidates against inhalation anthrax in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 16, 1141–1148 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Beedham, R. J., Turnbull, P. C. & Williamson, E. D. Passive transfer of protection against Bacillus anthracis infection in a murine model. Vaccine 19, 4409–4416 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pitt, M. L. et al. In vitro correlate of immunity in a rabbit model of inhalational anthrax. Vaccine 19, 4768–4773 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Reuveny, S. et al. Search for correlates of protective immunity conferred by anthrax vaccine. Infect. Immun. 69, 2888–2893 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Friedlander, A. M., Welkos, S. L. & Ivins, B. E. Anthrax vaccines. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 271, 33–60 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Larkin, M. Anthrax vaccine is safe and effective-but needs improvement, says IOM. Lancet 359, 951 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Little, S. F. et al. Defining a serological correlate of protection in rabbits for a recombinant anthrax vaccine. Vaccine 22, 422–430 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Little, S. F. et al. Duration of protection of rabbits after vaccination with Bacillus anthracis recombinant protective antigen vaccine. Vaccine 24, 2530–2536 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fay, M. P. et al. Anthrax vaccine-induced antibodies provide cross-species prediction of survival to aerosol challenge. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 151ra126 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) Emergent BioSolutions (2015).

  22. 22.

    Sivko, G. S. et al. Evaluation of early immune response-survival relationship in cynomolgus macaques after anthrax vaccine adsorbed vaccination and bacillus anthracis spore challenge. Vaccine 34, 6518–6528 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Flick-Smith, H. C. et al. Mucosal or parenteral administration of microsphere-associated Bacillus anthracis protective antigen protects against anthrax infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 70, 2022–2028 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rhie, G. E. et al. A dually active anthrax vaccine that confers protection against both bacilli and toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10925–10930 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schneerson, R. et al. Poly(gamma-D-glutamic acid) protein conjugates induce IgG antibodies in mice to the capsule of bacillus anthracis: a potential addition to the anthrax vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8945–8950 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, J. et al. An adenovirus-vectored nasal vaccine confers rapid and sustained protection against anthrax in a single-dose regimen. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 20, 1–8 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Krishnan, V. et al. Efficacy and Immunogenicity of single-dose AdVAV intranasal anthrax vaccine compared to anthrax vaccine absorbed in an aerosolized spore rabbit challenge model. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 22, 430–439 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Balderas, M. A. et al. Progress toward the development of a NEAT protein vaccine for anthrax disease. Infect. Immun. 84, 3408–3422 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Garmory, H. S. et al. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium expressing a chromosomally integrated copy of the bacillus anthracis protective antigen gene protects mice against an anthrax spore challenge. Infect. Immun. 71, 3831–3836 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Stokes, M. G. et al. Oral administration of a Salmonella enterica-based vaccine expressing bacillus anthracis protective antigen confers protection against aerosolized B. anthracis. Infect. Immun. 75, 1827–1834 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Leckenby, M. W. et al. Enhanced vaccine antigen delivery by Salmonella using antibiotic-free operator-repressor titration-based plasmid stabilisation compared to chromosomal integration. Microb. Pathog. 46, 201–206 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Coulson, N. M., Fulop, M. & Titball, R. W. Bacillus anthracis protective antigen, expressed in Salmonella typhimurium SL 3261, affords protection against anthrax spore challenge. Vaccine 12, 1395–1401 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Galen, J. E. et al. Mucosal immunization with attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi expressing protective antigen of anthrax toxin (PA83) primes monkeys for accelerated serum antibody responses to parenteral PA83 vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 199, 326–335 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Osorio, M. et al. Anthrax protective antigen delivered by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Ty21a protects mice from a lethal anthrax spore challenge. Infect. Immun. 77, 1475–1482 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ramirez, K., Ditamo, Y., Galen, J. E., Baillie, L. W. & Pasetti, M. F. Mucosal priming of newborn mice with S. Typhi Ty21a expressing anthrax protective antigen (PA) followed by parenteral PA-boost induces B and T cell-mediated immunity that protects against infection bypassing maternal antibodies. Vaccine 28, 6065–6075 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Baillie, L. W. et al. Towards a human oral vaccine for anthrax: the utility of a Salmonella Typhi Ty21a-based prime-boost immunization strategy. Vaccine 26, 6083–6091 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Murphy, J. R. et al. Immunogenicity of Salmonella typhi Ty21a vaccine for young children. Infect. Immun. 59, 4291–4293 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Levine, M. M. et al. Duration of efficacy of Ty21a, attenuated Salmonella typhi live oral vaccine. Vaccine 17, S22–27 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Gilman, R. H. et al. Evaluation of a UDP-glucose-4-epimeraseless mutant of Salmonella typhi as a liver oral vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 136, 717–723 (1977).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wahdan, M. H., Serie, C., Cerisier, Y., Sallam, S. & Germanier, R. A controlled field trial of live Salmonella typhi strain Ty 21a oral vaccine against typhoid: three-year results. J. Infect. Dis. 145, 292–295 (1982).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Levine, M. M. et al. Development of vaccines and drugs against diarrhea. in 11th noble conference (eds Holmgren, J., Lindberg, A. & Möllby, R.) 90–101 (Student lilteratur, 1986).

  42. 42.

    Simanjuntak, C. H. et al. Oral immunisation against typhoid fever in Indonesia with Ty21a vaccine. Lancet 338, 1055–1059 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cryz, S. J. Jr. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of Salmonella typhi Ty21a vaccine in young Thai children. Infect. Immun. 61, 1149–1151 (1993).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cryz, S. J. Jr. Post-marketing experience with live oral Ty21a vaccine. Lancet 341, 49–50 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Levine, M. M. in Vaccines (eds Plotkin, S. A & Orenstein, W. A) 781–814 (W. B. Saunders, 1999).

  46. 46.

    Kopecko, D. J. et al. Genetic stability of vaccine strain Salmonella Typhi Ty21a over 25 years. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 299, 233–246 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Townes, J. M. Reactive arthritis after enteric infections in the United States: the problem of definition. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50, 247–254 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ohtake, S. et al. Room temperature stabilization of oral, live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi-vectored vaccines. Vaccine 29, 2761–2771 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Singh, Y., Chaudhary, V. K. & Leppla, S. H. A deleted variant of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen is non-toxic and blocks anthrax toxin action in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19103–19107 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dharmasena, M. N., Hanisch, B. W., Wai, T. T. & Kopecko, D. J. Stable expression of Shigella sonnei form I O-polysaccharide genes recombineered into the chromosome of live Salmonella oral vaccine vector Ty21a. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303, 105–113 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zeng, Y. et al. Towards development of stable formulations of a live attenuated bacterial vaccine: A preformulation study facilitated by a biophysical approach. Hum. Vaccines 5, 322–331 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Welkos, S. L. Plasmid-associated virulence factors of non-toxigenic (pX01-) Bacillus anthracis. Microb. Pathog. 10, 183–198 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Welkos, S., Bozue, J., Twenhafel, N. & Cote, C. Animal models for the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of infection by Bacillus anthracis. Microbiol. Spectr. 3, TBS-0001–2012 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dharmasena, M. N. et al. Development of an acid-resistant salmonella Typhi Ty21a attenuated vector for improved oral vaccine delivery. PLoS One 11, e0163511 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wu, Y. et al. Development of a live attenuated bivalent oral vaccine against Shigella sonnei shigellosis and typhoid fever. J. Infect. Dis. 215, 259–268 (2017).

  56. 56.

    Vivotif [package insert-USA]. Crucell Switzerland LTD. (2013).

  57. 57.

    Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cherepanov, P. P. & Wackernagel, W. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene. 158, 9–14 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dennis Kopecko for encouragement, advice, and suggestions on this study and the manuscript. We are grateful to Bing Jiang for seed bank production, and Yonas Abebe for help with the preparation of the manuscript. The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Anthrax PA produced in E. coli, originally from B. anthracis (NR-140), and Anthrax LF (LF-HMA) produced in E. coli, originally from B. anthracis (NR-36209). This work was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health ( SBIR grant R43AI091273 ‘Live Attenuated Oral Anthrax Vaccine’ and R01 grant R01AI098884 ‘Development of Enabling Vector/Antigen Expression Technology for an Orally-Delivered Vaccine for Anthrax and Plague’ to B.K.L.S.

Author information




B.K.L.S., M.O., M.L., S.C., Y.W., R.E.S., J.W.P., A.K.C., E.R.J., L.A.Y., and S.L.H. designed the studies, supervised data generation, analyzed and interpreted the data. M.L., M.O., T.T.W., J.W.P., E.R.J., S.C., L.G., R.X., N.K.C., W.S.L., J.E.P., S.K.S., S.F., L.A.Y. performed the experiments. B.K.L.S., Y.W., J.W.P., A.K.C., S.L.H. wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and commented on the final manuscript and have agreed to its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Kim Lee Sim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors B.K.L.S., M.L., Y.W., T.T.W., L.G., R.X., N.K.C., R.E.S., and S.L.H. are employees of Protein Potential LLC that seeks to commercialize the Ty21a-PA-01 anthrax vaccine. The authors E.R.J., S.C. as well as B.K.L.S. and S.L.H. are employees of Sanaria Inc., which co-develops the Ty21a-PA-01 anthrax vaccine. B.K.L.S. is the owner and president of Protein Potential LLC and received grant funding from NIAID. Author M.O. has a patent “DNA promoters and anthrax vaccines” (US7,758,855; 8,247,225 and EU EP1670505). The authors J.W.P., W.S.L., L.A.Y., J.E.P., S.K.S., A.K.C., and S.F. declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, B.K.L., Li, M., Osorio, M. et al. Protection against inhalation anthrax by immunization with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Ty21a stably producing protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis . npj Vaccines 2, 17 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing