Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Habituation as an adaptive shift in response strategy mediated by neuropeptides

Abstract

Habituation is a non-associative form of learning characterized by a decremented response to repeated stimulation. It is typically framed as a process of selective attention, allowing animals to ignore irrelevant stimuli in order to free up limited cognitive resources. However, habituation can also occur to threatening and toxic stimuli, suggesting that habituation may serve other functions. Here we took advantage of a high-throughput Caenorhabditis elegans learning assay to investigate habituation to noxious stimuli. Using real-time computer vision software for automated behavioral tracking and optogenetics for controlled activation of a polymodal nociceptor, ASH, we found that neuropeptides mediated habituation and performed an RNAi screen to identify candidate receptors. Through subsequent mutant analysis and cell-type-specific gene expression, we found that pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) neuropeptides function redundantly to promote habituation via PDFR-1-mediated cAMP signaling in both neurons and muscles. Behavioral analysis during learning acquisition suggests that response habituation and sensitization of locomotion are parts of a shifting behavioral strategy orchestrated by pigment dispersing factor signaling to promote dispersal away from repeated aversive stimuli.

Introduction

Habituation is a form of non-associative learning characterized by a decremented response to repeated sensory input. It has been documented across phylogeny and is often considered a cognitive “building-block”.1 Consistent with this role, deficits in habituation are associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders, including autism and schizophrenia.2 Habituation is typically framed as a process to free up limited neuronal resources by allowing organisms to ignore irrelevant stimuli. In conflict with this characterization are reports of habituation to stimuli that are potentially lethal. As an example, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans habituates to repeated activation of a pair of polymodal nociceptor neurons.3, 4 These neurons, named ASH, receive input at the worm’s nose and elicit a rapid reversal response to chemical repellents (many of them toxic), osmotic pressure (potentially lethal), and physical contact.5,6,7,8 This behavior is of particular interest in the context of habituation, both because of the diversity of the cues detected by ASH and because of the potential lethal consequences of “ignoring” such stimuli.

Most learning studies tend to be response-centric, that is focusing solely on measuring a single-response metric without considering changes in other components of behavior. This may offer only an incomplete picture of the effect that the stimulus has on overall behaviors. In this study, we consider not only the plasticity of the components of the ASH reversal response, but also how this changing response relates to the ongoing behavior of the animal. Analysis of changes in multiple behavioral components of the ASH-driven response suggested a coordinated alteration in strategy to facilitate dispersal away from potentially lethal stimuli. Pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) signaling was essential for this process and tissue-specific expression experiments demonstrated that the PDF receptor, PDFR-1, inhibited reversal responses and facilitated dispersal by promoting cAMP production in neurons and muscles. Our experiments demonstrate that C. elegans shift behavioral strategies from a backwards escape response in order to evade an immediate threat to a rapid forward acceleration attempting to evacuate away from the locus of the stimulation. This study provides a strong hypothesis and mechanism to explain why organisms habituate to aversive stimuli.

Results

Responding to repeated ASH photoactivation requires GLR-1

We previously established a high-throughput habituation assay of the ASH avoidance circuit, such that repeated ASH photoactivation results in longer response latency and shorter duration reversals, with very little decrement in the probability of responding.3 In investigating molecular components mediating this behavioral plasticity, we evaluated the loss-of-function phenotypes of several glutamate transmission mutants: glr-1 (lacking an AMPA receptor subunit), nmr-1 (lacking an NMDA receptor subunit), and eat-4 (lacking a vesicular glutamate transporter). While control animals, and those lacking NMR-1, maintained a high probability of responding to repeated 2 s light pulses at 0.1 Hz, loss of EAT-4 eliminated reversal responses, and loss of glr-1 led to animals that responded initially, but were unresponsive by the end of the trial (Fig. 1a, b). The phenotype of the glr-1 mutant could be at least partially rescued with a GLR-1::GFP transgene (Fig. 1c), confirming the glr-1 mutation as the causative allele. Note that the duration and latency habituation metrics are difficult to interpret for the glr-1 mutant because the small number of animals responding after 30 stimuli greatly increased variability of these measures.

Fig. 1
figure1

Habituation of glutamate transmission mutants reveals a glr-1 mutant phenotype. a Representative raster plots depicting the behavioral state at the beginning (left) and end (right) of training. Pixels are color coded for speed with negative values corresponding to backward locomotion. Black bars indicate 2 s of whole-plate illumination with blue light at 250 μW/mm2. b, c Proportion of the population reversing to each of thirty 2 s light pulses administered at 0.1 Hz. b The glr-1-independent response did not persist across the assay, c but could be rescued with a GLR-1 expressing transgene (GLR-1::GFP) or suppressed by loss of egl-3. Mean ± SEM. ‘#’, ‘¥’, and ‘&’ denote groups that are statistically different based on the likelihood of responding to the final stimulus. N = 6 plates/strain

Habituation is mediated by neuropeptides

Previous studies demonstrated that the glr-1 phenotypes associated with naive ASH-mediated responses could be at least partially suppressed by disrupting neuropeptide synthesis, demonstrating that inhibitory peptides modulate this avoidance circuit.9, 10 To test whether neuropeptides were involved in habituation of ASH-mediated responses, we disrupted neuropeptide synthesis with a mutant allele of EGL-3, a proprotein convertase required for neuropeptide synthesis.11, 12 Indeed the habituation phenotype of the glr-1 mutant was suppressed by disrupting neuropeptide processing, as a glr-1;egl-3 double mutant was more responsive at the end of the assay than the glr-1 single mutant (Fig. 1c). Thus GLR-1 is essential for sustained reversal responses to repeated ASH activation only in the presence of neuropeptides. Like control animals, the egl-3 single mutant maintained a high probability of responding across the trial (Supplementary Fig. S1A), however unlike controls the egl-3 mutant did not display response latency habituation (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Loss of egl-3 also affected the shape of the reversal duration habituation curve, but this appeared to be primarily caused by short initial responses that did not change in duration across the 30 stimuli (Supplementary Fig. S1C). To confirm the role of neuropeptides in response latency habituation, we tested a mutant lacking EGL-21, a carboxypeptidase required for the synthesis of neuropeptides.13, 14 As with EGL-3, loss of EGL-21 disrupted habituation of response latency and duration (Supplementary Fig. S1B), suggesting that peptidergic signaling promotes habituation of ASH-mediated reversals.

GPCR RNAi suppressor screen

The C. elegans genome has 119 neuropeptide precursor genes that can be processed into over 250 peptides that signal through at least 128 neuropeptide G-protein-coupled receptors.15, 16 To identify the neuropeptide signal or signals responsible for egl-3 suppression of glr-1, we used systemic RNAi to knockdown known and predicted neuropeptide receptors in a glr-1 mutant background. The nervous system of C. elegans is generally refractory to RNAi by feeding, but can be sensitized by neuron-specific expression of the dsRNA channel, SID-1, in a lin-15b mutant background.17 While the previous experiments reported here used a transgene dependent on FLP Recombinase to specifically target ChR2 to ASH,18 a more responsive strain with a highly expressing sra-6p::ChR2 transgene was used for the RNAi screen. The sra-6 promoter expresses strongly in ASH and more weakly in a pair of sensory neurons (ASI) and interneurons (PVQ).19 The increased sensitivity of this strain allowed for the testing of more animals, as a larger surface area could be illuminated at irradiance sufficient for robust responding. We first confirmed that RNAi knockdown of egl-3 promoted responding in this genetic background: as predicted, a glr-1 mutant sensitized for neuronal systemic RNAi was more likely to reverse after repeated photoactivation of sra-6-expressing cells if fed bacteria expressing double-stranded RNA complementary to egl-3 (Fig. 2a). Using the RNAi by feeding approach, we evaluated the reduction of function phenotype for known and predicted neuropeptide GPCRs (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Table S1). After correcting for multiple comparisons, only knockdown of PDFR-1 suppressed the decreased response phenotype of the glr-1 mutant.

Fig. 2
figure2

GPCR RNAi screen. a Proportion of the population reversing to each stimulus for animals fed RNAi clones that increased the probability of a reversal to the final stimulus. Mean ±SEM. ‘#’ and ‘&’ denote significantly different groups based on the likelihood of responding to the final stimulus. b Proportion of animals reversing to the final stimulus for populations fed RNAi clones to knockdown egl-3 or one of 57 GPCRs. Knockdown was done in a background sensitized to neuronal RNAi by feeding: glr-1; lin-15b; sid-1; unc-119p::sid-1. Each circle is the mean of three plates, with multiple replicates for the control and egl-3 targeting vector. Dashed lines mark upper and lower critical values (values corresponding to |z-score| > 4.46; P < (0.05/57 =) 0.0008)

PDFR-1 signaling in neurons and muscles mediates habituation

PDFR-1 is a member of the secretin receptor family and is associated with a state of arousal in both worms and flies.20,21,22,23 To evaluate the RNAi result, we tested a pdfr-1 mutant in the habituation assay. Compared to control, loss of pdfr-1 only slightly, but significantly, increased the probability of reversing to the final stimulus of habituation training (Fig. 3a), but robustly decreased response latency (Fig. 3b) and increased response duration (Fig. 3c) in the latter half of the habituation series. PDFR-1 has three known ligands encoded by two precursor genes, pdf-1 and pdf-2.24, 25 Loss of pdf-1 alone had an intermediate habituation phenotype for response latency (Fig. 3b), while loss of pdf-2 alone had no effect, and simultaneous loss of pdf-1 and pdf-2 recapitulated the loss of the receptor (Fig. 3a–c). The same habituation deficit for the pdfr-1 mutant was apparent when ChR2 was targeted specifically to ASH, as opposed to all sra-6 expressing cells (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Fig. 3
figure3

PDF signaling promotes habituation. Proportion of the population reversing (a), reaction time (b), and response duration (c) to each of thirty 2 s light pulses administered at 0.1 Hz. df Effects of restoring PDFR-1 expression to neurons or muscles. Mean ± SEM. ‘#’ denotes groups significantly different from control and ‘&’ denotes groups significantly different from both control and the pdfr-1 mutant based on the response to the final stimulus. N = 2–4 plates/strain

PDFR-1 is expressed in body wall muscle cells, as well as in neurons in the head and tail.20, 24 In an attempt to identify in which tissue PDFR-1 functioned to promote habituation, we used an intersectional promoter rescuing strategy, in which Cre recombinase expression vectors were co-injected with inverted and floxed pdfr-1 cDNA driven by the pdfr-1 promoter.21 Full rescue was defined as scores distinct from the mutant and not significantly different from the control. Pan-neuronal expression of Cre (tag-168 promoter) fully rescued the response probability and latency phenotypes (Fig. 3d, e); however, none of the lines tested rescued response duration habituation. Using several different promoters to target Cre to subsets of pdfr-1-expressing neurons, we only ever observed a partial rescue for response latency (Supplementary Table S2), suggesting PDFR-1 is functioning in a distributed network. In contrast, restoring pdfr-1 expression in the body wall muscle (myo-3 promoter) fully restored response probability and partially rescued the response latency (Fig. 3e) and duration phenotypes (Fig. 3f). Full rescue of response duration was not observed, even when pdfr-1 expression was simultaneously restored to muscles and neurons (data not shown). Thus, probability, duration, and latency represent dissociable metrics mediated by PDFR-1 signaling in multiple cells types.

Elevated cAMP in PDFR-1-positive cells promotes habituation

As with many secretin receptors, PDFR-1 is thought to signal through Gαs to stimulate cAMP synthesis by adenylyl cyclase. Indeed HEK239 cells expressing PDFR-1 showed a dose-dependent increase in cAMP levels with PDFR-1 activation.24 To test whether elevating cAMP levels in pdfr-1 expressing cells could be used to normalize behavior in the absence of PDF neuropeptides, we used the pdfr-1 promoter to drive expression of a constitutively active adenylyl cyclase (ACY-1(P260S)26) in the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant background. Stimulating cAMP synthesis compensated for loss of the PDF ligands, as response latency habituation of the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant expressing constitutively active ACY-1 was not significantly different from control (Fig. 4b). The results were less clear with the reversal duration metric, as the rescue line was intermediate and was not significantly different from either mutant or wild type (Fig. 4c). It is important to note that this chronic elevation of cAMP did not simply induce a habituated state, as initial responses were unaffected. This suggests that PDF signaling is permissive (rather than instructive) for habituation of ASH-mediated responses.

Fig. 4
figure4

PDFR-1 signals through cAMP to promote habituation. Proportion of the population reversing (a), reaction time (b), and response duration (c) to each of 30 2 s light pulses administered at 0.1 Hz. Mean  ±  SEM. ‘#’ and ‘&’ denote significantly different groups based on the response to the final stimulus. N = 3 plates/strain

PDF signaling promotes dispersal to repeated sensory input

Spontaneously behaving worms occupy at least two distinct behavioral states: roaming and dwelling.27, 28 The states are characterized by different sequences of common motor patterns, with roaming promoting dispersal through faster movement and fewer turns and reversals. PDF signaling appears to promote roaming over dwelling behavior in both males and hermaphrodites.20, 21, 29 This behavior has been attributed to sensory, motor, and interneurons, as well as muscle.20,21,22 We evaluated spontaneous locomotion by quantifying displacement over the 30 s window immediately preceding the habituation assay. Consistent with its previously reported propensity for a dwelling over roaming state,21 we observed that the pdfr-1 mutants traveled shorter distances than control (Supplementary Fig. S3). Loss of either pdf-1 or pdf-2 caused a similar, but less severe phenotype that was additive in the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant (Supplementary Fig. S3), supporting earlier findings that the PDF ligands function partially redundantly to promote roaming via the PDFR-1 receptor.21, 29

Given the role of PDF signaling in habituation (Fig. 3) and spontaneous dispersal (Supplementary Fig. S3), we evaluated the influence of repeated ASH activation on locomotion during habituation by quantifying displacement over the first and final 30 s of the habituation assay. Within-strain comparisons revealed an increase in distance traveled in the final 30 s compared to the initial 30 s for the control animals that was not apparent for either the pdfr-1 mutant or the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant (Fig. 5a, b). The habituation-induced dispersal deficit of the pdfr-1 mutant could be rescued by restoring PDFR-1 expression to neurons or muscles (with the full extent of the behavior rescued by simultaneous expression in both tissues) and the deficit of the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant could be rescued by elevating cAMP in PDFR-1-expressing cells (Fig. 5c). The habituation-induced dispersal deficit for the pdfr-1 mutant was also apparent using the transgenic strain in which ChR2 expression was restricted to ASH (Supplementary Fig. S2), ruling out an essential contribution from ASI and PVQ in mediating this behavioral plasticity.

Fig. 5
figure5

PDF signaling promotes dispersal during habituation training. a Representative trajectories during a 20 s interval at the beginning (0–20 s), middle (140–160 s), and end (280–300 s) of the habituation assay with thirty 2 s light pulses delivered at 0.1 Hz. Individual tracks were randomly assigned colors and set to start from the same point. N = 4 plates/strain. Scale bar = 1 mm b Displacement (shortest distance between the start and endpoint) over the first and final 30 s of the assay for the PDF signaling mutants. c Displacement over the first and final 30 s of the assay for PDF signaling mutant rescue lines. ‘#’ denotes a significant increase in displacement (one-tailed, P < 0.01, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) over the assay. Circles are plate means, crosses are population means  ±  SEM

The shorter reversal responses associated with habituation would be predicted to facilitate dispersal in an environment with persistent ASH-sensed stimuli. However, the partial habituation phenotype of the PDF signaling mutants seemed insufficient to explain the marked difference in training-induced dispersal (Fig. 5). We therefore examined locomotion in the intervals between stimuli and observed that repeated ASH activation was associated with an increase in the probability of forward movement (Fig. 6a) and a marked increase in forward speed (Fig. 6d) in the 3 s period immediately preceding stimuli. While these behavioral changes may be necessary to increase displacement, they are not sufficient, as locomotion of the pdfr-1 and pdf-1;pdf-2 mutants displayed a similar pattern of plasticity, albeit with a fewer animals responding and slower speeds at the end of the assay (Fig. 6b–d). We propose that dispersal behavior is a combination of reversal response habituation and forward locomotion sensitization.

Fig. 6
figure6

Shift in locomotion between stimuli. Proportion of the population’s time spent moving forward, backward, or not at all during the 3 s interval immediately preceding each stimulus delivered at 0.1 Hz for control (a) and pdfr-1 (b) and pdf-;pdf-2 (c) mutants. d Speed of worms moving forward during the same 3 s intervals. Mean ± SEM. N = 6 plates/strain

Discussion

Using detailed behavioral analysis during learning acquisition, we identified a suite of changes associated with habituation training. Maintaining a response to repeated ASH photoactivations depended on the glutamate receptor subunit GLR-1 (Fig. 1b). The habituation phenotype of the glr-1 mutant could be suppressed by simultaneous loss of EGL-3, a proprotein convertase required for the synthesis of neuropeptides (Fig. 1c). We performed an RNAi screen to identify the key neuropeptide receptor or receptors, ultimately identifying PDFR-1 and its ligands, encoded by pdf-1 and pdf-2. PDF signaling played an important role in both habituation of ASH-mediated responses and in locomotory sensitization associated with repeated ASH activation (Figs. 3 and 5). Genetic rescue experiments suggested that elevated cAMP in pdfr-1-expressing neurons and muscles promoted habituation of ASH-mediated reversals and locomotory sensitization (Figs. 3d–f, 4b, and 5c).

PDF signaling is highly conserved across the protostomian evolutionary lineage. In Drosophila, it is a key regulator of the circadian cycle via rhythmic release to promote arousal during waking.23, 30 PDF receptors are distantly related to mammalian calcitonin GPCRs expressed in neurons and muscles and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors, which appear to have conserved function regulating arousal and circadian rhythms. For C. elegans, Choi et al.22 found that secretion of PDF-1 neuropeptides is developmentally regulated and that reduced PDF-1 secretion around molting underlies the associated behavioral quiescence (worm sleep-like state). In adults, PDF peptides also appear to signal arousal, promoting roaming over dwelling behavior, with switching between these states occurring every several minutes.21 It is unclear what mediates the abrupt transitions during spontaneous locomotion, but our data suggest that the roaming state associated with PDF signaling can be induced by repeated sensory input. Consistent with this finding, the elevated arousal observed in worms with dysfunctional Neuropeptide Y receptor, NPR-1, is caused by enhanced sensory activity in both ASH and the body touch cells. This increased arousal can be at least partially suppressed by loss of PDFR-1.31

Habituation training by blue light activation of ASH appears to induce a roaming state by PDFR-1 signaling in both muscles and neurons (Fig. 5c). In addition, PDFR-1 plays a role in the kinetics of habituation of ASH response probability, duration, and latency, which can be differentially rescued by PDFR-1 signaling in neurons and muscles. Although there is a difference in baseline speed between unperturbed pdfr-1 and control worms, there is very little difference in the initial blue light reversal response measures. Thus, the effects of pdfr-1 on responses to repeated stimulation require pdfr-1 mediated plasticity in both neurons and muscles. Activating the signaling cascade downstream of PDFR-1 (i.e., by elevating cAMP levels) did not induce a habituated state, suggesting PDF signaling is necessary, but not sufficient for normal habituation. Indeed other neuropeptides must be involved, as the neuropeptide synthesis mutants (egl-3 and egl-21) had a more severe habituation phenotypes than the pdfr-1 or pdf-1;pdf-2 mutants (i.e., Supplementary Figs. S1B vs. S2B). Neuropeptides underlie a wide variety of processes and their importance in behavioral state and plasticity is an emerging trend.32 Insulin signaling has proven to have an especially prominent role in C. elegans behavioral plasticity33,34,35,36,37; however, this may be due to the use of food as an unconditioned stimulus in many associative learning paradigms. Other experience-dependent changes in behavior in C. elegans have also been shown to depend on neuropeptide signaling. For example, prolonged exposure to a volatile attractant initiates a neuropeptide-to-neuropeptide feedback loop causing decreased attraction38 and repeated mechanosensory input in a massed habituation protocol recruits dense-core vesicles to the synaptic terminals of the body touch cells, leading to increased release of a FMRFamide-related neuropeptide, FLP-20, and smaller reversal responses.39

Habituation is often framed as a process allowing animals to ignore irrelevant stimuli in order to free up limited cognitive resources. However, animals can also habituate to threatening or noxious stimuli, a seemingly maladaptive behavior. For example, the defensive gill and siphon withdrawal response in Aplysia,40 crab escape response to an overhead shadow,41 and the squid escape response to visual cues of a predator.42 Failure to avoid many of the stimuli detected by ASH could be fatal for C. elegans. Why then do reversal responses habituate? Detailed behavioral analysis of an intact freely moving animal revealed that the end point of habituation is not simply the decrement of a single-response metric, as it is so often reduced to. Our data suggest that habituation is part of a strategy to promote dispersal from a dangerous locale. Repeated stimulation actually induced a suite of behavioral changes that together defined the state of the organism. For repeated ASH photoactivation, reversal responses are largely maintained, but their duration shortens and latency increases as the population becomes more active. At the same time that the reversal responses are getting shorter, forward locomotion between responses is increasing. However, the avoidance circuit must balance this more long-term goal, with evasion of immediate threats. The maintenance of response probability and the increased response latency associated with habituation may help to strike this balance. Given the graded connection between ASH and reversal command interneurons,43 loss of an early immediate reversal response would allow animals to ignore less intense stimuli, such as nose touch, while maintaining sensitivity to more serious threats, such as osmotic shock.

The dual-process theory of habituation hypothesizes that each stimulus induces both local circuit habituation and organism-wide sensitization and the observed behavior reflects an integration of these two processes.44 In this case, coincident habituation and sensitization form an optimal escape strategy: minimize non-essential backward movement and promote forward movement. With this view, the outcome of habituation is not simply ignoring sensory input, but part of shifting the organism’s behavioral strategy to avoid dangerous stimuli. This is not inconsistent with the idea of Bolles45 that animals cannot afford the time to learn to avoid danger, thus they are prepared with a somewhat hierarchical series of default responses to danger known as species-specific defense responses (SSDRs). If one behavioral strategy is ineffective in decreasing the threat, the animal shifts to a different strategy. Bolles describes rodent SSDRs as freeze, flee, or fight. One can imagine that if a response to a dangerous or threatening stimulus does not decrease the threat, and the stimulus continues to occur, then the animal might shift to another strategy in an attempt to escape the stimulus. Thus habituation to a noxious stimulus might not just represent a decrease in the original response, but a shift from the original ineffective response to a different response that might decrease the threat. Although this interpretation is not expected to generalize to every habituating behavior, our approach highlights the value of detailed analysis of multiple behavioral metrics in an intact, freely moving animal, as opposed to a response-centric approach seen in the majority of learning assays.

Methods

Strains

Hermaphrodites were maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) seeded with Escherichia coli (OP50) as described previously.46 Two integrated Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) transgenes (gifts from William Schafer, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology) were used for ASH photoactivation: ljIs105[sra-6p::ChR2::YFP + unc-122p::GFP], which expresses ChR2 strongly in ASH and more weakly in chemosensory neuron ASI and interneuron PVQ19 and ljIs114[gpa-13p::FLPase + sra-6p::FTF::ChR2::YFP], which uses intersecting promoters and FLP recombinase to specifically target ChR2 to ASH.18, 47 Strains with the ljIs114 transgene were illuminated at greater intensity and so carried a loss-of-function allele of lite-1, which encodes a native C. elegans short-wavelength light receptor.48, 49

AQ2235 ljIs114 lite-1(ce314) and/or AQ2026 ljIs105 were crossed with TU3595, MT1241, CX3019, VM487, MT6308, VC671, KP1580, VC2609, FX04393, and LSC27 to generate the following strains:

VG186 lin-15b(n744); sid-1(pk3321) ljIs105; uIS72[unc-119p::sid-1 + mec-18p::GFP + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG222 egl-21(n611); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG223 glr-1(ky176); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG227 nmr-1(ak4); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG232 eat-4(ky5); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG234 egl-3(ok979); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG244 egl-3(ok979); glr-1(ky176); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG250 glr-1(ky176); GLR-1::GFP; lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG264 pdfr-1(ok3425); lite-1(ce314) ljIs114

VG272 glr-1(ky176); lin-15b(n744); sid-1(pk3321) ljIs105; uIs72[unc-119p::sid-1 + mec-18p::GFP + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG380 pdf-2(tm4393); ljIs105

VG382 pdf-1(tm1996); ljIs105

VG383 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105

VG393 pdf-2(tm4393); pdf-1(tm1996); ljIs105

For cAMP overexpression in pdfr-1-positive neurons, pSF180 [pdfr-1p::ACY-1(P260S)-sl2-mCherry (50 ng/μl)] was injected into the gonad of the pdf-1;pdf-2 double mutant VG393. For pdfr-1 rescue experiments, pSF134 [pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] (30–35 ng/μl)] was co-injected with one of several Cre expressing plasmids (1 ng/μl) for cell type-specific Cre-lox recombination in pdfr-1 mutant VG383. pSF180, pSF134, and two of the seven Cre expressing plasmids (pSF11 [tag-168p::Cre] and pSF176 [eat-4p::Cre]) are described in Flavell et al.21 and were provided by the Bargmann lab at Rockefeller University. Also co-injected was pCFJ90 (myo-2p::mCherry (2 ng/μl)50) for use as a visible marker and pBluescript to make the total injected DNA concentration 100 ng/μl.51 The following strains were generated by microinjection:

VG492 pdf-1(tm1996); pdf-2(tm4393); ljIs105; yvEx152[pdfr-1p::ACY-1(P260S)-sl2-mCherry + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG447, VG448, VG449 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + tag-168p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG485, VG486, VG487, VG488 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + myo-3p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG411, VG412 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + glr-1p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG434, VG438, VG441 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + eat-4p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG442, VG443, VG446 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + npr-1p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG481, VG82, VG483, VG484 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + gcy-36p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG507, VG508, VG509, VG510 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + ocr-4p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry]

VG647, VG648, VG649, VG650 pdfr-1(ok3425); ljIs105; yvEx[pdfr-1p::inv[pdfr-1.d-sl2-GFP] + tag-168p::Cre + myo-3p::Cre + myo-2p::mCherry].

Plasmid construction

To generate the Cre expression vectors, promoters were subcloned into plasmid pSF11 [tag-168p::Cre] cut with FseI and AscI.

A 2 kb myo-3 promoter was amplified from plasmid KP#1866 (Josh Kaplan, Harvard University) using oligos 5′-CTTAACGGCCGGCCTGTGTGTGATTGCTTTTTCACAATC-3′ and 5′-ACACTTGGCGCGCCTCTAGATGGATCTAGTGGTCGTGGG-3′.

A 2.7 kb glr-1 promoter was amplified from plasmid pSH128 (Alexander Gottschalk, Goethe University Frankfurt) using oligos

5′-CTTAACGGCCGGCCTTTCAAGTGTCCTGTTGTC-3′ and

5′-ACACTTGGCGCGCCTGTGAATGTGTCAGATTGG-3′.

A 3.4 kb npr-1 promoter was amplified from N2 genomic DNA using oligos

5′-CTTAACGGCCGGCCAAACGCAGTTGGCACAAAG-3′ and

5′-ACACTTGGCGCGCCTTGGCCTATGTCTGAAATTT-3′.

A 1.1 kb gcy-36 promoter was amplified from N2 genomic DNA using oligos

5′-CTTAACGGCCGGCCATGATGTTGGTAGATGGGGTTTGG-3′ and

5′-ACACTTGGCGCGCCTGTTGGGTAGCCCTTGTTTGAATTT-3′.

A 4.8 kb ocr-4 promoter was amplified from N2 genomic DNA using oligos

5′-CTTAACGGCCGGCCTCAAAGACCTTGGCTCCAC-3′ and

5′-ACACTTGGCGCGCCTAATACAAGTTAGATTCAGAGA-3′.

Behavioral tracking

NGM plates were spread with 50–100 µl E. coli OP50 liquid culture mixed with all-trans retinal (ATR; or equal volume of ethanol vehicle) for a final plate concentration of 5 µM ATR. Plates were stored at room temperature in the dark for 24–48 h before use. For age-synchronized colonies, gravid adults were left 3–6 h to lay ~20–60 eggs before being removed from the plate. Animals were reared at 20 °C and tested as 3- or 4-day olds. Behavioral tracking occurred directly on the rearing plates, except for experiments using strains with extra-chromosomal arrays, in which case ~35 animals were picked (based on expression of the fluorescent co-injection marker) to ATR-containing food plates 24 h before testing (control worms were picked at the same time under identical conditions). Plates of a given strain were tested in a random order. Optimal sample sizes were determined from previous research.3

Multi-Worm Tracker software (version 1.2.0.2) was used for stimulus delivery and image acquisition.52 Following a 3–5 min acclimatization phase, stimuli were presented using custom-built LED rings (Luxeon Star LEDs) capable of illuminating 60 or 35 mm (diameter) Petri plates with uniform blue light (max = 70 or 250 µW/mm2, respectively). An orange filter prevented the blue light from entering the camera. Behavioral quantification with Choreography software (version 1.3.0_r103552) used “--shadowless”, “--minimum-move-body 2”, and “--minimum-time 20” filters to restrict the analysis to animals that moved at least 2 body lengths and were tracked for at least 20 s. The MeasureReversal plugin was used to identify reversals occurring within 3 s (dt = 3) of the light pulse onset. Custom MatLab scripts organized and summarized Choreography output files. Each experiment was independently replicated at least twice. No blinding was necessary because the Multi-Worm Tracker scores behavior objectively.

RNAi

Systemic RNAi was performed essentially as described.53, 54 RNAi plates comprised NGM agar, 1 mM IPTG, and 5 µM ATR seeded with overnight liquid culture of E. coli strain HT115 carrying either control plasmid L4440 or an RNAi vector targeting egl-3 or one of 57 GPCRs. One or 2 days after seeding, VG186 adults were bleached onto the RNAi plates and the first-generation adults were tested behaviorally.

Statistics

One-way ANOVAs and Tukey’s honestly significant difference criterion were used to compare responses between strains. For response probability, tests compared the mean from the proportion of worms responding to the final stimulus on each plate (n = number of plates tested). For latency, duration, and displacement metrics, data were combined across plates and comparisons were collective means from the final stimulus (latency and duration) or final 30 s of the assay (displacement; n = number of animals tested). Unless otherwise noted, α was 0.01.

Data availability

The data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code used to analyze data in the current study is available from the first author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Rankin, C. H. et al. Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 92, 135–138 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McDiarmid, T. A., Bernardos, A. C. & Rankin, C. H. Habituation is altered in neuropsychiatric disorders? A comprehensive review with recommendations for experimental design and analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 80, 286–305 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ardiel, E. L. et al. Dopamine receptor DOP-4 modulates habituation to repetitive photoactivation of a C. elegans polymodal nociceptor. Learn. Mem. 23, 495–503 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hart, A. C., Kass, J., Shapiro, J. E. & Kaplan, J. M. Distinct signaling pathways mediate touch and osmosensory responses in a polymodal sensory neuron. J. Neurosci. 19, 1952–1958 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hilliard, M. A. et al. In vivo imaging of C. elegans ASH neurons: cellular response and adaptation to chemical repellents. EMBO J. 24, 63–72 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hilliard, M. A., Bargmann, C. I. & Bazzicalupo, P. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Curr. Biol. 12, 730–734 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kaplan, J. M. & Horvitz, H. R. A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2227–2231 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bargmann, C. I., Thomas, J. H. & Horvitz, H. R. Chemosensory cell function in the behavior and development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 55, 529–538 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kass, J., Jacob, T. C., Kim, P. & Kaplan, J. M. The EGL-3 proprotein convertase regulates mechanosensory responses of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 21, 9265–9272 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mellem, J. E., Brockie, P. J., Zheng, Y., Madsen, D. M. & Maricq, A. V. Decoding of polymodal sensory stimuli by postsynaptic glutamate receptors in C. elegans. Neuron. 36, 933–944 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gómez-Saladín, E., Wilson, D. L. & Dickerson, I. M. Isolation and in situ localization of a cDNA encoding a Kex2-like prohormone convertase in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 14, 9–25 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Husson, S. J., Clynen, E., Baggerman, G., Janssen, T. & Schoofs, L. Defective processing of neuropeptide precursors in Caenorhabditis elegans lacking proprotein convertase 2 (KPC-2/EGL-3): mutant analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Neurochem. 98, 1999–2012 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jacob, T. C. & Kaplan, J. M. The EGL-21 carboxypeptidase E facilitates acetylcholine release at Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junctions. J. Neurosci. 23, 2122–2130 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Husson, S. J. et al. Impaired processing of FLP and NLP peptides in carboxypeptidase E (EGL-21)-deficient Caenorhabditis elegans as analyzed by mass spectrometry. J. Neurochem. 102, 246–260 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li, C. & Kim, K. WormBook Online Review of C. elegans Biology. doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.142.1 (The C. elegans Research Community, 2008).

  16. 16.

    Frooninckx, L. et al. Neuropeptide GPCRs in C. elegans. Front. Endocrinol. 3, 167 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Calixto, A., Chelur, D., Topalidou, I., Chen, X. & Chalfie, M. Enhanced neuronal RNAi in C. elegans using SID-1. Nat. Methods 7, 554–559 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ezcurra, M., Tanizawa, Y., Swoboda, P. & Schafer, W. R. Food sensitizes C. elegans avoidance behaviours through acute dopamine signalling. EMBO J. 30, 1110–1122 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Troemel, E. R., Chou, J. H., Dwyer, N. D., Colbert, H. A. & Bargmann, C. I. Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegans . Cell 83, 207–218 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Barrios, A., Ghosh, R., Fang, C., Emmons, S. W. & Barr, M. M. PDF-1 neuropeptide signaling modulates a neural circuit for mate-searching behavior in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1675–1682 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Flavell, S. W. et al. Serotonin and the neuropeptide PDF initiate and extend opposing behavioral states in C. elegans. Cell 154, 1023–1035 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Choi, S., Chatzigeorgiou, M., Taylor, K. P., Schafer, W. R. & Kaplan, J. M. Analysis of NPR-1 reveals a circuit mechanism for behavioral quiescence in C. elegans. Neuron 78, 869–880 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Renn, S. C., Park, J. H., Rosbash, M., Hall, J. C. & Taghert, P. H. A pdf neuropeptide gene mutation and ablation of PDF neurons each cause severe abnormalities of behavioral circadian rhythms in Drosophila. Cell 99, 791–802 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Janssen, T. et al. Functional characterization of three G protein-coupled receptors for pigment dispersing factors in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15241–15249 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Janssen, T. et al. Discovery and characterization of a conserved pigment dispersing factor-like neuropeptide pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurochem. 111, 228–241 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Saifee, O., Metz, L. B., Nonet, M. L. & Crowder, C. M. A gain-of-function mutation in adenylate cyclase confers isoflurane resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Anesthesiology 115, 1162–1171 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ben Arous, J., Laffont, S. & Chatenay, D. Molecular and sensory basis of a food related two-state behavior in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 4, e7584 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fujiwara, M., Sengupta, P. & McIntire, S. L. Regulation of body size and behavioral state of C. elegans by sensory perception and the EGL-4 cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Neuron 36, 1091–1102 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Meelkop, E. et al. PDF receptor signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans modulates locomotion and egg-laying. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 361, 232–240 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kunst, M., Tso, M. C. F., Ghosh, D. D., Herzog, E. D. & Nitabach, M. N. Rhythmic control of activity and sleep by class B1 GPCRs. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 50, 18–30 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Choi, S. et al. Sensory neurons arouse C. elegans locomotion via both glutamate and neuropeptide release. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005359 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    McDiarmid, T. A., Ardiel, E. L. & Rankin, C. H. The role of neuropeptides in learning and memory in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2, 15–20 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen, Z. et al. Two insulin-like peptides antagonistically regulate aversive olfactory learning in C. elegans. Neuron. 77, 572–585 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lin, C. H. A. et al. Insulin signaling plays a dual role in Caenorhabditis elegans memory acquisition and memory retrieval. J. Neurosci. 30, 8001–8011 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Vellai, T., McCulloch, D., Gems, D. & Kovács, A. L. Effects of sex and insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling on performance in an associative learning paradigm in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 174, 309–316 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tomioka, M. et al. The insulin/PI 3-kinase pathway regulates salt chemotaxis learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron 51, 613–625 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kodama, E. et al. Insulin-like signaling and the neural circuit for integrative behavior in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 20, 2955–2960 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chalasani, S. H. et al. Neuropeptide feedback modifies odor-evoked dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans olfactory neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 615–621 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li, C. et al. The FMRFamide-related neuropeptide FLP-20 is required in the mechanosensory neurons during memory for massed training in C. elegans. Learn. Mem. 20, 103–108 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pinsker, H., Kupfermann, I., Castellucci, V. & Kandel, E. Habituation and dishabituation of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. Science 167, 1740–1742 (1970).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Brunner, D. & Maldonado, H. Habituation in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus: effect of morphine and naloxone. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 162, 687–694 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Long, T. M., Hanlon, R. T., Maat, A. T. & Pinsker, H. M. Non-associative learning in the squid lolliguncula brevis (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Mar. Behav. Physiol. 16, 1–9 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lindsay, T. H., Thiele, T. R. & Lockery, S. R. Optogenetic analysis of synaptic transmission in the central nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun. 2, 306 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Groves, P. M. & Thompson, R. F. Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol. Rev. 77, 419–450 (1970).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bolles, R. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychol. Rev. 77, 32–48 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schmitt, C. et al. Specific expression of channelrhodopsin-2 in single neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 7, e43164 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ward, A., Liu, J., Feng, Z. & Xu, X. Z. S. Light-sensitive neurons and channels mediate phototaxis in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 916–922 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Edwards, S. L. et al. A novel molecular solution for ultraviolet light detection in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol 6, e198 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Frøkjaer-Jensen, C. et al. Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 40, 1375–1383 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mello, C. C., Kramer, J. M., Stinchcomb, D. & Ambros, V. Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10, 3959–3970 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Swierczek, N. A., Giles, A. C., Rankin, C. H. & Kerr, R. A. High-throughput behavioral analysis in C. elegans. Nat. Methods 8, 592–598 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kamath, R. S., Martinez-Campos, M., Zipperlen, P., Fraser, A. G. & Ahringer, J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2, RESEARCH0002 (2001).

  54. 54.

    Kamath, R. S. et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231–237 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Strains were provided by the CGC (funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs P40 OD010440), and by William Schafer at the MRC, Cambridge University; strains and/or plasmids were provided by Cori Bargmann at Rockefeller University and Alexander Gottschalk, Goethe University Frankfurt. RNAi clones were obtained from Don Moerman at UBC. This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship to E.L.A. and a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant #122216-2013) to C.H.R.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.L.A., A.J.Y., A.C.G., and C.H.R. designed the experiments. E.L.A. and A.J.Y. collected and analyzed the data under the supervision of C.H.R. E.L.A. and C.H.R. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catharine H. Rankin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ardiel, E.L., Yu, A.J., Giles, A.C. et al. Habituation as an adaptive shift in response strategy mediated by neuropeptides. npj Science Learn 2, 9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0011-8

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing