# Nodeless superconductivity and its evolution with pressure in the layered dirac semimetal 2M-WS2

## Abstract

Recently, the transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) system 2M-WS2 has been identified as a Dirac semimetal exhibiting both superconductivity with the highest Tc ~ 8.5 K among all the TMD materials and topological surface states. Here we report on muon spin rotation (μSR) and density functional theory studies of microscopic SC properties and the electronic structure in 2M-WS2 at ambient and under hydrostatic pressures (pmax = 1.9 GPa). The SC order parameter in 2M-WS2 is determined to have single-gap s-wave symmetry. We further show a strong negative pressure effect on Tc and on the SC gap Δ. This may be partly caused by the pressure induced reduction of the size of the electron pocket around the Γ-point. We also find that the superfluid density ns is weakly affected by pressure. The absence of a strong pressure effect on ns and the absence of a correlation between ns and Tc in 2M-WS2, in contrast to the other SC TMDs Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2, is explained in terms of its location in the optimal (ambient pressure) and above the optimal (under pressure) superconducting regions of the phase diagram and its large distance to the other possible competing or cooperating orders.

## Introduction

The transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are representative layered materials presently attracting very strong interest from research communities working on nanoscience and 2-d layered systems.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 The TMDs share the MX2 chemical formula, with M being a transition metal (M = Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Mo, W or Re) and X being a chalcogen (X = S, Se, or Te). TMDs are obtained in various crystal structures 1T, 2H, and 1T′ with different stackings of the individual MX2 layers. A number of ground states have been observed in these systems including charge-density waves, superconductivity, semiconductors and topological metals. New physics findings in TMDs include strong excitonic states, novel phenomena from valley splitting, Dirac cone dispersion and topological effects, and more.1,4

Layered materials, with highly anisotropic electronic properties have been found to be potential hosts for unconventional superconductivity. TMDs exhibit many features strikingly similar to those reported in other unconventional superconductors. Superconductivity can be observed under pressure as for the pristine 1T polytype TMD materials which are not superconducting at ambient pressure, but exhibit charge density wave (CDW) states, instead.15 The metallic 2H polytypes have two, or more, Fermi surfaces and saddle bands, allowing for dual orderings, which can be coexisting CDW and SC orderings, two superconducting gaps, two CDW gaps, and possibly even pseudogaps above the onset temperature of CDW orderings, as reported in some cuprate superconductors.16,17,18 Upon application of pressure, the CDW ground state is suppressed and the superconducting transition temperature is enhanced. A dome-like superconducting phase was induced by electrostatic gating in the semiconducting 2H-MoSe2, 2H-MoS2, 2H-MoTe2, and 2H-WS2 with a Tc of up to 10 K.19,20,21 It was also shown that using field effect gating, one can induce superconductivity in monolayer semiconducting TMD WS2,22 and one could access an unprecedented doping range revealing a rich set of competing electronic phases ranging from band insulator, via superconductor, to a reentrant insulator at high doping. Superconductivity with a very low Tc ~ 0.1 K was also reported in the Weyl semimetal MoTe2 which exhibits a low temperature orthorhombic Td structure.5 However, under the application of pressure, the orthorhombic structure transforms into the 1T′ structure and Tc is enhanced to about 8 K. Recently, we found a correlation between the superfluid density at T = 0 and the transition temperature Tc in the type-II Weyl semimetal Td-MoTe223 and the deviation from the linear correlation in 2H-NbSe2 under pressure.24 These observations resemble the ones found earlier in cuprates25,26,27,28,29,30 and Fe-based superconductors.31,32,33,34 These examples demonstrate that the TMDs exhibit rather unconventional superconducting and normal state properties.

Recently, superconductivity with Tc ~ 8.8 K was reported in the new compound 2M-WS2, which is constructed from 1T′-WS2 monolayers.35 2M-WS2 has the highest Tc among all TMD materials at ambient pressure. The system possesses a semimetallic band structure. The crystal structure of 2M-WS2 has a different stacking of 1T′-WS2 monolayers along the a-axis, compared to Td-MoTe2 and 1T′-WTe2. In addition to superconductivity, topological surface states with a single Dirac cone were theoretically predicted for 2M-WS2. Hence, this system represents one of the few examples of a material with both superconductivity and a topologically non-trivial surface states. The possible occurrence of topological superconductivity (TSC) in 2M-WS2 after fine tuning of some parameters is also discussed.35 TSCs are materials with unique electronic states consisting of a full pairing gap in the bulk and gapless surface states composed of Majorana fermions (MFs).36,37,38 Up to now, the only known properties of the superconducting state in 2M-WS2 are the critical temperatures and fields.35 Thus, a thorough exploration of superconductivity in 2M-WS2 from both experimental and theoretical perspectives is imperative.

To further study superconductivity and its nature in 2M-WS2, it is critical to measure the superconducting order parameter at the microscopic level. Thus, we conducted ambient and high-pressure39,40,41,42 muon spin relaxation/rotation (μSR) measurements of the magnetic penetration depth λ in the polycrystalline sample of 2M-WS2. This quantity is one of the fundamental parameters of a superconductor, since it is related to the superfluid density ns via 1/λ2 = μ0e2ns/m* [where m* is the effective mass; see also Eq. (2)]. Most importantly, the temperature dependence of λ is particularly sensitive to the topology of the superconducting gap: while in a fully gapped superconductor, Δλ−2(T) ≡ λ−2(0) − λ−2(T) vanishes exponentially upon decreasing the temperature, it vanishes as a power of T in a superconductor containing a gap with nodes. The μSR technique provides a powerful tool to measure λ in the vortex state of type II superconductors in the bulk of the sample,43 in contrast to many techniques that probe λ only near the surface. Details are provided in the Methods section.

Here we show that the superconducting order parameter in 2M-WS2 possesses single-gap s-wave symmetry, which is consistent with the presence of dominant hole-type charge carriers, as deduced from Hall effect measurements. Moreover, we observed a strong negative pressure effect on the critical temperature Tc and the superconducting gap Δ as well as on the size of the electron pocket around the Γ-point, at which a band inversion appears up to the highest applied pressure. However, the pressure effect on the superfluid density in 2M-WS2 is very weak. We find that the ratio Tc/ns is located in the Uemura plot close to those of other superconducting TMD systems, as Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2, and those of other unconventional superconductors. This suggests that 2M-WS2 exhibits rather unconventional superconducting properties. The absence of a strong pressure effect on the superfluid density and its correlation with Tc, which was previously found in Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2, is explained in terms of the absence of competing or cooperating order to superconductivity, as 2M-WS2 exhibits optimal superconducting conditions already at ambient pressure. By application of pressure we are pushing the system away from any possible competing/cooperating order. Our findings, therefore, pose a challenge for understanding the underlying physics in these layered TMDs and might ultimately lead to a better understanding of generic aspects of non-BCS behaviors in unconventional superconductors.

## Results

### Magnetic penetration depth and the superconducting gap symmetry

Figure 1a exhibits transverse-field (TF) muon-time spectra for the polycrystalline sample of 2M-WS2 measured in an applied magnetic field of μ0H = 60 mT above (T = 10 K) and below (T = 200 mK) the superconducting (SC) transition temperature Tc. Above Tc the oscillations reflecting the muon-spin precession show a small damping due to the random local fields from the nuclear magnetic moments. Below Tc the relaxation rate strongly increases upon decreasing the temperature due to the presence of a nonuniform local magnetic field distribution resulting from the formation of the flux-line lattice (FLL) in the Shubnikov phase. By carefully examining the TF-μSR data, we find that the sample consists of a superconducting and a non-superconducting volume fraction. To visualise these two fractions of the sample, we report on Fig. 1b the Fourier transforms of the μSR time spectra, shown in Fig. 1a. At T = 200 mK the narrow signal around μ0Hext = 60 mT, originates from the non-superconducting part of the sample, while the broad signal with a first moment μ0Hint < μ0Hext, marked by the solid arrow in Fig. 1b, arises from the superconducting part of the sample. The estimated superconducting volume fraction from the μSR data is ~45%. It is interesting to investigate whether magnetism is present either in the superconducting or non-superconducting fractions of the sample. In order to search for magnetism, we have carried out zero-field (ZF) μSR experiments above and below Tc, which are shown in Fig. 1c. No sign of static magnetism could be detected in the ZF time spectra down to 1.7 K. Moreover, the ZF relaxation rate is small and does not change between 10 and 1.7 K. ZF-μSR spectra are well described by the combination of a Lorentzian and a Gaussian Kubo-Toyabe depolarization function,44,45 reflecting the field distribution at the muon site created by the nuclear dipole moments and randomly oriented diluted weak local electronic moments. Returning to the discussion of the TF-μSR data, we observe a strong diamagnetic shift of the internal magnetic field μ0Hint sensed by the muons below Tc. This is evident in Fig. 2a, where we plot the temperature dependence of ΔBdia = μ0(Hint,SC − Hint,NS), i.e., the difference between the internal field μ0Hint,SC measured in the SC fraction and one μ0Hint,NS measured in the normal state at T = 10 K. The strong diamagnetic shift along with the negative field dependence of the superconducting depolarization rate σsc (see Fig. 2b) excludes the occurrence of field induced magnetism in 2M-WS2. Note that in some Fe-based and cuprate high temperature superconductors, where field induced magnetism was detected, a paramagnetic shift and a linear increase of σsc with magnetic field were observed.46,47,48 The absence of magnetism in zero-field or under applied magnetic fields implies that the increase of the TF relaxation rate below Tc is solely arising from the FLL in the superconducting fraction. The strong superconducting response from nearly 50% of the sample points to the bulk superconductivity in 2M-WS2. We note that the diamagnetic moment, which we deduce from the bulk magnetization measurements suggest a 100% SC volume in the sample, which is consistent with the previous report.35 However, bulk magnetisation measures the diamagnetic screening of the whole sample where a 100% screening does not necessarily imply a 100% SC volume. μSR, being a local probe, directly measures the SC volume fraction within the sample. Thus, in this work we provide a more precise estimate for the SC volume in 2M-WS2. The μSR evidence for a phase separation between SC and paramagnetic regions in 2M-WS2 is an interesting finding, which might be an intrinsic feature of this system.

From the TF muon time spectra, we determined the Gaussian superconducting relaxation rate σsc (after subtracting the nuclear contribution), which is proportional to the second moment of the field distribution (see Methods section). Figure 2b shows the obtained field dependence of σsc at 1.7 K. Each point was obtained by field cooling the sample from above Tc to 1.7 K. As expected from the London model one observes that first σsc strongly increases with increasing magnetic field until reaching a maximum at 40 mT.49 Above 40 mT, σsc decreases with increasing magnetic field. This appears consistent with a behaviour expected for s-wave superconductor for an ideal triangular vortex lattice.49 Taking into account the critical field of 3 T, the theoretical s-wave behaviour has been calculated according to the Brandt formula.49 It is shown by the dashed line in Fig. 2b, which agrees well with the experimental data. The second moment of the resulting inhomogeneous field distribution is related to the magnetic penetration depth λ by $$\left\langle {\Delta B^2} \right\rangle \propto \sigma _{sc}^2 \propto \lambda ^{ - 4}$$.49 In order to investigate the symmetry of the superconducting gap, we have therefore derived the temperature-dependent London magnetic penetration depth λ(T), which is related to the relaxation rate by:

$$\frac{{\sigma _{{\mathrm{sc}}}(T)}}{{\gamma _\mu }} = 0.06091\frac{{\Phi _0}}{{\lambda ^2(T)}}.$$
(1)

Here, γμ is the gyromagnetic ratio of the muon, and Φ0 is the magnetic-flux quantum. In order to accurately determine the temperature dependence of λ, it is important to do the temperature dependent measurements of σsc slightly above the maximum of σsc(H), where Eq. (1) is valid. Thus, the measurements were done with an applied magnetic field of 60 mT. In Fig. 2c, we show the temperature dependence of the muon spin depolarization rate σsc. Below Tc the relaxation rate σsc starts to increase from zero with decreasing temperature due to the formation of the FLL and reaches σsc 1.43 μs−1 at the base-T. The temperature dependence of σsc, which reflects the topology of the SC gap, exhibits a saturation at low temperatures. This is consistent with a nodeless superconductor, for which the superfluid density nsσsc reaches its zero-temperature value exponentially. For a quantitative analysis, we in the local (London) approximation (λξ, where ξ is the coherence length), calculated λ(T). The result of the gap analysis is shown in Fig. 3. The data are perfectly compatible with a single s-wave gap with a value of Δ = 1.31(1) meV.

The London magnetic penetration depth λ is given as a function of ns,50 the effective mass m*, ξ and the mean free path l, according to

$$\frac{1}{{\lambda ^2}} = \frac{{4\pi n_se^2}}{{m^ \ast c^2}}\cdot \frac{1}{{1 + \xi /l}}.$$
(2)

For systems close to the clean limit, ξ/l → 0, the second factor essentially becomes unity, and the simple relation 1/λ2ns/m* holds. Considering the upper critical fields Hc2 of 2M-WS2, as reported in detail by Fang et al.,35 we can estimate the in-plane coherence length to be ξab 8.8 nm at ambient pressure. At ambient pressure, the in-plane mean free path l was estimated to be lab 200 nm. No estimates are currently available for l under pressure. However, the in-plane l is most probably independent of pressure considering the fact that the pressure mostly reduces the interlayer distance due to the unique anisotropy resulting from the stacking of layers with van der Waals type interactions between them. Thus, in view of the short coherence length and relatively large l, we can reliably assume that 2M-WS2 lies close to the clean limit.23,51 With this assumption, we obtain the ground-state value ns/(m*/me)  2.8 × 1026 m−3, where me is the free electron mass.

### Probing superconductivity and band structure as a function of pressure

To gain further insight into the superconducting properties of 2M-WS2, the temperature dependence of the superfluid response was measured under applied pressures up to 1.9 GPa. Moreover, the pressure effect of the electronic structure was also calculated. We note that the SC volume fraction was found to be independent of pressure. In Fig. 4a, b, we show the temperature evolution of σsc, normalised to the value at ambient pressure, and the diamagnetic shift ΔBdia measured under various hydrostatic pressures. A single gap s-wave model describes the σsc(T) data very well up to the highest pressure. Remarkably, both Tc and Δ decreases substantially upon application of pressure. Tc decreases from 8.5 K at p = 0 GPa to 6 K at 1.9 GPa. Δ decreases from 1.31(1) meV at 0 GPa to 0.82(2) meV at 1.9 GPa. However, the analysis of the temperature dependence of σsc(T) reflects only a ~5% increase of the zero-temperature value of ns. This means that the absolute value of the superfluid density in 2M-WS2 is very weakly affected by pressure. The band structures, calculated in the presence of the spin-orbit coupling for ambient pressure and under the applied pressures of p = 1.3 GPa and 1.9 GPa are shown in Fig. 4d–f (see also Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Information). The band inversion between the p-orbital of the S atoms and the d-orbital of the W atoms at the Γ-point is found up to the highest investigated pressure. This indicates that the topology of the bands in 2M-WS2 remains nontrivial under pressure. We also find that the electron pockets at the Γ-point shrink upon application of pressure, which might have some interesting consequences on the physical properties of the system.

## Discussion

We can now discuss the main results of our measurements on 2M-WS2:

1. (i)

The temperature dependence of the superfluid density, reflected by the one of the relaxation rate σsc, is well described at all pressures by a single gap s-wave model. This is surprising since a multi-band bulk electronic structure with hole-like bands around the N point and electron-like bands around the Γ point was found for 2M-WS2. On the other hand, Hall effect measurements showed that the hole-type carriers are dominant with a very high density of ne,h = 8.58 × 1026 m−3 at T = 10 K. It is interesting that the superfluid density ns/(m*/me)  2.8 × 1026 m−3, which we estimated for 2M-WS2 is very close to the normal state hole density ne,h, indicating that the superconductivity stems mostly from hole carriers. Thus, single gap superconductivity in this multi-band system may be explained by the fact that the superconducting gap occurs only on the hole-like Fermi surface and that the carrier density on the electron Fermi surface is not sufficient to induce superconductivity. This conclusion is also substantiated by the fact that superfluid density is insensitive to the shrinkage of the electron pocket, caused by pressure. If superconductivity would exist on the electron pocket, the pressure induced reduction of the size of the electron pocket would result to the reduction of the associated electron carrier concentration and thus the reduction of the superfluid density, which is not the case in 2M-WS2. Single gap s-wave superconductivity in 2M-WS2 is also different from the two-gap s + s-wave superconductivity, observed in the superconducting TMDs Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2. This again might be related to the fact that in both these systems both hole and electron bands contribute to superconductivity, while in 2M-WS2 the superconductivity most likely arises predominantly from the hole like band. Regarding the surface states, a single Dirac cone at the Γ point was reported. When the Fermi level is exactly at the Dirac point, only a single Fermi surface was obtained.35 A single Fermi surface at the surface and a dominant hole-like Fermi surface in the bulk is consistent with single gap superconductivity, observed in our study. It was also suggested that if the superconductivity is induced on this single Fermi surface, topological superconductivity is expected. As the muons penetrate deep into the material, we cannot obtain information on the superconductivity on the surface and about its topological nature. However, because of the semimetallic bulk electronic structure, the topological surface states are partially mixed with bulk states. Thus, the superconducting properties in the bulk could, to some extent, reflect the properties also on the surface.

2. (ii)

We observed, for the first time, a strong negative pressure effect on the critical temperature Tc and the superconducting gap Δ. Both quantities decrease by ~30% under 1.9 GPa. Note that the superconducting transition temperature, estimated by the Allen and Dynes modified McMillan formula,35 was found to be ~2 K, which is a factor of 4 smaller than the experimental value Tc 8.5 K (see Fig. S2 in the Supplementary Information). This indicates that some dynamical and anharmonic effects on the electron-phonon coupling as well as interband scattering between electron and hole pockets are most likely the reasons for high-Tc in 2M-WS2. According to our DFT calculations, the electron pocket around the Γ point shrinks by pressure, which would lead to the suppression of interband processes and this might have some effect on Tc. Pressure could also weaken the anharmonic electron-lattice interactions, giving rise to the suppression of Tc. Some additional experiments are certainly needed to understand the negative pressure effect on the critical temperature. The superfluid density ns/(m*/me) is essentially pressure independent, displaying at the most a slight increase of about 5%. The ratio between the superfluid density and the critical temperature is located in the Uemura plot close to those of Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2 and other unconventional superconductors, as shown in Fig. 5. This suggests that 2M-WS2 exhibits rather unconventional SC properties and might suggest a common mechanism and related electronic origin for the superconductivity in these superconducting TMDs. On the other hand, the insensitivity of the superfluid density to the strong change in Tc is in contrast to the strong correlation between these two quantities in Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2. Let us try to understand this apparent discrepancy. The nearly linear relationship between Tc and the superfluid density was originally observed in hole-doped cuprates in the underdoped region of the phase diagram,25,26 where the ratio between Tc and their effective Fermi temperature TF is about Tc/TF ~ 0.05 corresponding to a 4–5 times reduction of Tc from the ideal Bose condensation temperature for a non-interacting Bose gas. These results were discussed in terms of a crossover from Bose-Einstein condensation to BCS-like condensation.28 It is important to note that in cuprates the relationship between Tc and ns/(m*/me) was shown to depend on which part of the SC dome the samples are located. Thus, the left-side of the dome (underdoped), which has close proximity with the competing/cooperating antiferromagnetic phase, the center of the dome (optimally doped), which is away from the AFM phase or the right side of the dome (overdoped) region, which is clearly seperated from the AFM phase. The linear increase of Tc with ns/(m*/me) is observed only in the underdoped region of the phase diagram. Within the optimal doping region Tc does not change despite the fact that ns/(m*/me) increases. In the overdoped region, Tc decreases, but ns/(m*/me) shows a small increase only. A similar behaviour was also observed in Fe-based superconductors.52 With this in mind, we compare the temperature-pressure phase diagrams for the systems 2M-WS2, Td-MoTe2, 2H-NbSe2. The phase diagrams are shown in Fig. 5b–d. There are two obvious differences between the phase diagrams. In the case of 2H-NbSe2 and Td-MoTe2 (Fig. 5c, d), the phase diagram consists of two different orders at ambient pressure: superconductivity and either charge density wave order or non-centrosymmetric structural order. In addition, Tc of both systems increases with increasing pressure within the investigated pressure region (0–2 GPa), indicating that the samples are located in the left-hand side of the dome with close proximity to another phase. In the case of 2M-WS2 (Fig. 5b), the system has solely superconducting order and there is no additional competing/cooperating order. In addition, the system 2M-WS2 has the highest Tc at ambient pressure, suggesting that the system is already in its optimal conditions in terms of superconductivity. Upon application of pressure, Tc decreases substantially, pushing the system towards the right-hand side of the dome, i.e. pushing it even further away from any possible competing phase. So, the location of 2M-WS2 in the optimal (ambient pressure) and above the optimal (under pressure) superconducting regions of the phase diagram might be a reason for the absence of the correlation between the superfluid density and the critical temperature in this system.

In conclusion, using DFT, we show that the topology of the bands in 2M-WS2 remains nontrivial up to the highest applied pressure. We further provide the first microscopic investigation of the superconductivity in the layered superconductor 2M-WS2 at ambient pressure as well as under hydrostatic pressures by means of muon-spin rotation. Specifically, the zero-temperature magnetic penetration depth λ(0) and the temperature dependence of the superfluid density were studied in 2M-WS2 by means of μSR experiments with pressures up to p 1.9 GPa. The temperature dependence of the superfluid density λ−2 is well described by a single gap s-wave scenario with a gap value of Δ  1.31(1) meV at ambient pressure. Considering the previous observations of the dominant hole-like Fermi surface in the bulk and single Fermi surface on the surface we suggest that the well resolvable SC gap occurs only on the hole-like Fermi surface. We also find that the ratio Tc/ns is located in the Uemura plot close to those of Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2 and other unconventional superconductors, suggesting that 2M-WS2 exhibits non-standard SC properties. Moreover, we observed the strong negative pressure effect on Tc and Δ, which may partly be due to the reduction of the size of the electron pocket at the Γ point, at which a band inversion appears up to the highest applied pressure. The superfluid density shows only a very weak positive pressure effect and thus the correlation between the superfluid density and the critical temperature is absent in 2M-WS2. This is in contrast to the strong pressure effects on λ−2 and its correlation with Tc, observed in the superconducting TMDs Td-MoTe2 and 2H-NbSe2. This discrepancy is discussed in terms of the absence of competing or cooperating order to superconductivity in 2M-WS2. These results hint towards the complex nature of the superconductivity in TMDs, despite its s-wave nature, which might have far reaching consequences for the future development of devices based on these materials.

## Methods

### Sample preparation

Topochemical synthesis procedure of the metastable, monoclinic tungsten diselenide (2M-WS2) can be found elsewhere.35,54 In a first step, a hexagonal phase of 2M-WS2 (SG P63/mmc - No 194), was synthetized by solid state reaction method at 850 °C for 35 h from a stoichiometric mixture of elemental sulfur (5N, Alfa Aesar) and tungsten (5N, Alfa Aesar). Than potassium intercalation and growth of KWS2 was conducted by annealing the stoichiometric mixture of K (3N5, Aldrich) and 2M-WS2 at 850 °C. After 35 h a specimen was cooled down to 550 °C with a rate of 6 °C/h. All syntheses reactions and sample growth processes described above where conducted in a double wall, evacuated and sealed quartz ampules. In a third step Kx(H2O)yWS2 compound was created by washing 3 g of KWS2 with deionized water. Finally Kx(H2O)yWS2 was oxidized with 200 ml of 0.1N K2Cr2O7/0.1N H2SO4 aqueous solution in order to get polycrystalline samples of 2M-WS2. Powders from the same batch were pressed in the form of pellets and were measured with various instruments. For the low background GPS instrument and low-temperature HAL-9500 instrument, equipped with BlueFors vacuum-loaded cryogen-free dilution refrigerator (DR), we used one pellet with 10 mm in diameter. For high pressure GPD instrument, several pellets with 5.9 mm in diameter were prepared and placed inside the pressure cell.

### Pressure cell

Double wall piston-cylinder type of cell made of CuBe/MP35N material was used in μSR experiments to generate pressures up to 1.9 GPa.39,40,41,42 Small indium plate was placed together with the sample in the pressure cell filled with the Daphne oil. The pressure was estimated by tracking the SC transition of a indium plate by AC susceptibility. The filling factor of the pressure cell was maximised. The fraction of the muons stopping in the sample was ~45%. The background of the pressure cell is well known and characterised.39

### μSR experiment

Spin-polarized muons μ+ are extremely sensitive magnetic probes. Muon-spin experiences the Larmor precession either in the local field or in an applied magnetic field. By probing the field distribution in the vortex state of a Type-II superconductor using transverse field μSR technique, fundamental parameters such as the magnetic penetration depth λ and the coherence length ξ can be measured in the bulk of a superconductor.

### Analysis of TF-μSR data

The following function is used to analyse the TF μSR data:55,56

$$\begin{array}{c}P(t) = A_s\exp \left[ { - \frac{{(\sigma _{sc}^2 \;+\; \sigma _{nm}^2)t^2}}{2}} \right]\cos (\gamma _\mu B_{int,s}t + \varphi )\\ +\; A_{pc}\exp \left[ { - \frac{{\sigma _{pc}^2t^2}}{2}} \right]\cos (\gamma _\mu B_{int,pc}t + \varphi ),\end{array}$$
(3)

Here As and Apc are the initial asymmetries of the μSR signal for the sample and the pressure cell, respectively. γ/(2π)  135.5 MHz/T is the muon gyromagnetic ratio and φ is the initial phase of the muon-spin ensemble. Bint is the internal magnetic field at the muon site. The depolarization rate σsc is due to the formation of the flux line lattice in the SC state and σnm describes the damping due to the nuclear dipolar contribution. σnm was obtained above Tc and was assumed to be constant over the entire temperature range. The relaxation rate σpc reflects the depolarization due to the nuclear moments of the pressure cell. It exhibits the temperature dependence below Tc41 due to the influence of the diamagnetic response of the SC sample on the pressure cell. In order to consider this influence we assume a linear coupling between σpc and the field shift of the internal magnetic field in the SC state: σpc(T) = σpc(T > Tc) + C(T)(μ0Hint,NS − μ0Hint,SC), where σpc(T > Tc) = 0.25 μs−1 is the temperature independent relaxation rate. μ0Hint,NS and μ0Hint,SC are the internal magnetic fields measured in the normal and in the SC state, respectively.

### Analysis of λ(T)

λ(T) was calculated within the London approximation (λξ) by the following function:50,55

$$\frac{{\lambda ^{ - 2}(T,\Delta _{0,i})}}{{\lambda ^{ - 2}(0,\Delta _{0,i})}} = 1 + \frac{1}{\pi }{\int}_0^{2\pi } {{\int}_{\Delta \left( {T,\varphi } \right)}^\infty {(\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial E}})} } \frac{{EdEd\varphi }}{{\sqrt {E^2 - \Delta _i(T,\varphi )^2} }},$$
(4)

where f = [1 + exp(E/kBT)]−1 is the Fermi function, φ is the angle along the Fermi surface, and Δi(T, φ) = Δ0,iΓ(T/Tc)g(φ) (Δ0,i is the maximum gap value at T = 0). The temperature dependence of the gap is given by the expression Γ(T/Tc) = tanh{1.82[1.018(Tc/T − 1)]0.51},57 while g(φ) describes the angular dependence of the gap. g(φ) = 1 for both an s-wave and an s + s-wave gap, and g(φ) = |cos(2φ)| for a d-wave gap.

### DFT calculations

2M-WS2 crystal has a monoclinic structure with the space group symmetry C2/m (number 12) and the following lattice parameters a = 12.856 Å, b = 3.2257 Å, c = 5.7109 Å, α = γ = 90° and β = 112.942° (crystallographic data CCDC 1853656). Full-relativistic electronic structure calculations were performed in Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)58,59 using Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)60,61 generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correlation functional and projected augmented wave (PAW) potentials.62,63 The van der Waals interactions were taken into account within the DFT-D2 approach by Grimme.64 The plane wave basis cutoff was set to 600 eV and 9 × 9 × 9 k-points grids were generated within Monkhorst–Pack method.

## Data availability

All relevant data are available from the authors. The data can also be found at the following link http://musruser.psi.ch/cgi-bin/SearchDB.cgi using the following details: Area: HAL and GPD. Year: 2018. Run numbers: 1009-1042 for HAL and 3199-3281 for GPD.

## References

1. 1.

Soluyanov, A. et al. Type II Weyl Semimetals. Nature 527, 495–498 (2015).

2. 2.

Huang, L. et al. Spectroscopic evidence for a type II Weyl semimetallic state in MoTe2. Nat. Mater. 15, 1155–1160 (2016).

3. 3.

Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014).

4. 4.

Ali, M. N. et al. Large, non-saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2. Nature 514, 205–208 (2014).

5. 5.

Qi, Y. et al. Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 11038 (2016).

6. 6.

Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347 (2014).

7. 7.

Zhang, Y. J., Oka, T., Suzuki, R., Ye, J. T. & Iwasa, Y. Electrically switchable chiral light-emitting transistor. Science 344, 725–728 (2014).

8. 8.

Ugeda, M. M. et al. Characterization of collective ground states in single-layer NbSe2. Nat. Phys. 12, 92–97 (2016).

9. 9.

Runze, Y. et al. Absence of local fluctuating dimers in superconducting Ir1−x(Pt,Rh)xTe2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 174515 (2018).

10. 10.

Sun, Y., Wu, S. C., Ali, M. N., Felser, C. & Yan, B. Prediction of Weyl semimetal in orthorhombic MoTe2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161107 (2015).

11. 11.

Belopolski, I. et al. Discovery of a new type of topological Weyl fermion semimetal state in MoxW1−xTe2. Nat. Commun. 7, 13643 (2016).

12. 12.

Le, L. P. et al. Magnetic penetration depth in layered compound NbSe2 measured by muon spin relaxation. Physica C 185, 2715–2716 (1991).

13. 13.

Yue, Y. & Kivelson, S. A. Fragile superconductivity in the presence of weakly disordered charge density waves. Phys. Rev. B 99, 144513 (2019).

14. 14.

Yokoya, T. et al. Fermi surface sheet-dependent superconductivity in 2H-NbSe2. Science 294, 2518–2520 (2001).

15. 15.

Sipos, B. et al. From Mott state to superconductivity in 1T-TaS2. Nat. Mat. 7, 960–965 (2008).

16. 16.

Tidman, J. P., Singh, O., Curzon, A. E. & Frindt, R. F. The phase transition in 2H-TaS2 at 75K. Philos. Mag. 30, 1191–1194 (1974).

17. 17.

Thompson, A. H., Gamble, F. R. & Koehler, R. H. Jr. Effects of intercalation on electron transport in tantalum disulfide. Phys. Rev. B 5, 2811–2816 (1972).

18. 18.

Naito, M. & Tanaka, S. Electrical transport properties in 2H-NbS2, -NbSe2, -TaS2 and -TaSe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 51, 219–227 (1982).

19. 19.

Ye, J. T. et al. Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator. Science 338, 1193–1196 (2012).

20. 20.

Shi, W. et al. Superconductivity series in transition metal dichalcogenides by ionic gating. Sci. Rep. 5, 12534 (2015).

21. 21.

Klemm, R. A. Pristine and intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide superconductors. Physica C 514, 86–94 (2015).

22. 22.

Lu, J. et al. Full superconducting dome of strong Ising protection in gated monolayer WS2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3551–3556 (2018).

23. 23.

Guguchia, Z. et al. Signatures of the topological s +− superconducting order parameter in the type-II Weyl semimetal T d-MoTe2. Nat. Commun. 8, 1082 (2017).

24. 24.

Rohr, F. V. et al. Unconventional scaling of the superfluid density with the critical temperature in transition metal dichalcogenides. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05292.

25. 25.

Uemura, Y. J. et al. Universal correlations between T c and n s/m* (carrier density over effective mass) in High-T c cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2317–2320 (1989).

26. 26.

Uemura, Y. J. et al. Magnetic-field penetration depth in K3C60 measured by muon spin relaxation. Nature 352, 605–607 (1991).

27. 27.

Uemura, Y. J. Superconductivity: exotic commonalities in phase and mode. Nat. Mater. 8, 253–255 (2009).

28. 28.

Uemura, Y. J. et al. Basic similarities among cuprate, bismuthate, organic, chevrel phase, and heavy-fermion superconductors shown by penetration depth measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2665–2668 (1991).

29. 29.

Emery, V. & Kivelson, S. Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density. Nature 374, 434–437 (1995).

30. 30.

Shengelaya, A. et al. Muon-spin-rotation measurements of the penetration depth of the infinite-layer electron-doped Sr0.9La0.1CuO2 cuprate superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 127001 (2005).

31. 31.

Luetkens, H. et al. The electronic phase diagram of the LaO1?xFxFeAs superconductor. Nat. Mater. 8, 305–309 (2009).

32. 32.

Carlo, J. P. et al. Static magnetic order and superfluid density of RFeAs(O,F)(R=La,Nd,Ce) and LaFePO studied by muon spin relaxation: unusual similarities with the behavior of cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 087001 (2009).

33. 33.

Khasanov, R. et al. Muon spin rotation studies of SmFeAsO0.85 and NdFeAsO0.85 superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 78, 092506 (2008).

34. 34.

Guguchia, Z. et al. Muon-spin rotation measurements of the magnetic penetration depth in the Fe-based superconductor Ba1−xRbxFe2As2. Phys. Rev. B 84, 094513 (2011).

35. 35.

Fang, Y. et al. Discovery of superconductivity in 2M WS2 with possible topological surface states. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901942 (2019).

36. 36.

Hosur, P., Dai, X., Fang, Z. & Qi, X.-L. Time-reversal-invariant topological superconductivity in doped Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 90, 045130 (2014).

37. 37.

Ando, Y. & Fu, L. Topological crystalline insulators and topological superconductors: From concepts to materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 361–381 (2015).

38. 38.

Grushin, A. G. Consequences of a condensed matter realization of Lorentz-violating QED in Weyl semi-metals. Phys. Rev. D 86, 045001 (2012).

39. 39.

Khasanov, R. et al. High pressure research using muons at the Paul Scherrer Institute. High. Press. Res. 36, 140–166 (2016).

40. 40.

Andreica, D. 2001 Ph.D. thesis IPP/ETH-Zürich.

41. 41.

Maisuradze, A., Shengelaya, A., Amato, A., Pomjakushina, E. & Keller, H. Muon spin rotation investigation of the pressure effect on the magnetic penetration depth in YBa2Cu3Ox. Phys. Rev. B 84, 184523 (2011).

42. 42.

Guguchia, Z. et al. Direct evidence for the emergence of a pressure induced nodal superconducting gap in the iron-based superconductor Ba0.65Rb0.35Fe2As2. Nat. Commun. 6, 8863 (2015).

43. 43.

Sonier, J. E., Brewer, J. H. & Kiefl, R. F. μSR studies of the vortex state in type-II superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 769–811 (2000).

44. 44.

Kubo, R. & Toyabe, T. Magnetic resonance and relaxation (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967).

45. 45.

Guguchia, Z. et al. Probing the pairing symmetry in the over-doped Fe-based superconductor Ba0.35Rb0.65Fe2As2 as a function of hydrostatic pressure. Phys. Rev. B 93, 094513 (2016).

46. 46.

Khasanov, R. et al. Superconductivity and field-induced magnetism in SrFe1.75Co0.25As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067010 (2009).

47. 47.

Williams, T. J. et al. Superfluid density and field-induced magnetism in BaFe(1−xCox)2As2 and SrFe(1−xCox)2As2 measured with muon spin relaxation. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094512 (2010).

48. 48.

Sonier, J. E. et al. Magnetism and disorder effects on muon spin rotation measurements of the magnetic penetration depth in iron-arsenic superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127002 (2011).

49. 49.

Brandt, E. H. Flux distribution and penetration depth measured by muon spin rotation in high-T c superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 37, 2349–2352 (1988).

50. 50.

Tinkham, M. Introduction to superconductivity. (Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 1975).

51. 51.

Frandsen, B. A. et al. Superconducting properties of noncentrosymmetric superconductor CaIrSi3 investigated by muon spin relaxation and rotation. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014511 (2015).

52. 52.

Hashimoto, K. et al. A Sharp peak of the zero-temperature penetration depth at optimal composition in BaFe2(As1−xPx)2. Science 336, 1554–1557 (2012).

53. 53.

Feng, Y. et al. Order parameter fluctuations at a buried quantum critical point. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7224–7229 (2012).

54. 54.

Wypych, F., Sollmann, K. & Schollhorn, R. Metastable layered chalcogenides 1T-MoS2, 2M-WS2 and 1T-Mo12W12S2: electrochemical study on their intercalation reactions. Mater. Res. Bull. 27, 545–553 (1992).

55. 55.

Suter, A. & Wojek, B. M. The fitting of the T-dependence of the penetration depth with α model was performed using the additional library BMW developped by B.M. Wojek. Phys. Procedia 30, 69–73 (2012).

56. 56.

Suter, A. & Wojek, B. M. Musrfit: a free platform-independent framework for μSR data analysis. Phys. Procedia 30, 69–73 (2012).

57. 57.

Carrington, A. & Manzano, F. Magnetic penetration depth of MgB2. Physica C 385, 205 (2003).

58. 58.

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

59. 59.

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

60. 60.

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1997).

61. 61.

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997).

62. 62.

Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

63. 63.

Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

64. 64.

Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

## Acknowledgements

The μSR experiments were carried out at the Swiss Muon Source (SμS), Paul Scherrer Insitute, Villigen, Switzerland using the HAL-9500 μSR spectrometer (πE3 beamline), GPS instrument (πM3 beamline) and high pressure GPD instrument (μE1 beamline). The work at the University of Zürich was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Grant No. PZ00P2_174015. R.K. acknowledges the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 200021_149486 and 200021_175935). T.N. and S.S.T. acknowledge the funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programm (ERC-StG-Neupert-757867-PARATOP). M.Z.H. is supported by US DOE/BES grant no. DE-FG-02-05ER46200.

## Author information

Project planning and coordination: Z.G. Sample growth and XRD experiment: D.G. and E.P. μSR experiments: Z.G., R.K., J.V., H.L., A.A. μSR data analysis: Z.G. Magnetization measurements: F.v.R. DFT calculations: M.B., S.S.T. and T.N. Data interpretation and draft writing: Z.G. with contributions and comments from all authors.

Correspondence to Zurab Guguchia or Dariusz J. Gawryluk.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Guguchia, Z., Gawryluk, D.J., Brzezinska, M. et al. Nodeless superconductivity and its evolution with pressure in the layered dirac semimetal 2M-WS2. npj Quantum Mater. 4, 50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-019-0189-5

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Structural phases of elemental Ga: Universal relations in conventional superconductors

• Rustem Khasanov
• , Hubertus Luetkens
• , Alex Amato
•  & Elvezio Morenzoni

Physical Review B (2020)

• ### Superconducting order parameter of the nodal-line semimetal NaAlSi

• Lukas Muechler
• , Zurab Guguchia
• , Jean-Christophe Orain
• , Jürgen Nuss
• , Leslie M. Schoop
• , Ronny Thomale
•  & Fabian O. von Rohr

APL Materials (2019)