Abstract
We propose an efficient microwavephotonic modulator as a resource for stationary entangled microwaveoptical fields and develop the theory for deterministic entanglement generation and quantum state transfer in multiresonant electrooptic systems. The device is based on a single crystal whispering gallery mode resonator integrated into a 3Dmicrowave cavity. The specific design relies on a new combination of thinfilm technology and conventional machining that is optimized for the lowest dissipation rates in the microwave, optical, and mechanical domains. We extract important device properties from finiteelement simulations and predict continuous variable entanglement generation rates on the order of a Mebit/s for optical pump powers of only a few tens of microwatts. We compare the quantum state transfer fidelities of coherent, squeezed, and nonGaussian cat states for both teleportation and direct conversion protocols under realistic conditions. Combining the unique capabilities of circuit quantum electrodynamics with the resilience of fiber optic communication could facilitate longdistance solidstate qubit networks, new methods for quantum signal synthesis, quantum key distribution, and quantum enhanced detection, as well as more powerefficient classical sensing and modulation.
Introduction
The development of superconducting quantum processors has seen remarkable progress in the last decade,^{1,2} but longdistance connectivity remains an unsolved problem. Coherent interconnects between superconducting qubits are currently restricted to an ultracold environment, which offers sufficient protection from thermal noise.^{3,4} A hybrid quantum network^{5} that combines the advanced control capabilities and the highspeed offered by superconducting quantum circuits, with the robustness, range,^{6} and versatility^{7} of moreestablished quantum telecommunication systems appears as the natural solution.^{8} Entanglement between optical and microwave photons is the key ingredient for distributed quantum computing with such a hybrid quantum network and would pave the way to integrate advanced microwave quantum state synthesis capabilities^{9,10,11} with existing optical quantum information protocols^{12,13} such as quantum state teleportation^{14,15} and secure remote quantum state preparation.^{16,17}
Electrooptomechanical systems stand out as the most successful platforms to connect optical and microwave fields near losslessly and with minimal added noise.^{18,19} Very recently, it has been shown that mechanical oscillators can also be used to deterministically generate entangled electromagnetic fields.^{20} Mechanical generation of microwaveoptical entanglement has been proposed^{21,22,23,24,25,26,27} but an experimental realization remains challenging. Lowfrequency mechanical transducers typically suffer from added noise and low bandwidth, whereas highfrequency piezoelectric devices require sophisticated wave matching and new materials, which so far results in low total interaction efficiencies,^{28,29,30} comparable to magnonbased interfaces.^{31}
Cavity electrooptic (EO) modulators are another proposed candidate^{32,33,34,35,36} to coherently convert photons, or to effectively generate entanglement between microwave and optical fields, employing the Pockels effect and without the need for an intermediary oscillator. Here, a material with a large and broadband nonlinear polarizability \({\chi }^{(2)}\) is shared between an optical resonator and the capacitor of a microwave cavity,^{37,38,39,40,41} a platform that has recently been used for efficient photon conversion with bulk^{42} and thinfilm crystals.^{43}
In this paper, we propose a multiresonant whispering gallery mode (WGM) cavity electrooptic modulator whose free spectral range (FSR) matches the microwave resonance frequency. It is tailored for optimal performance at ultralow temperatures, in particular, with respect to unwanted optical heating and thermal occupation of the microwave mode. We minimize the necessary optical pump power by maximizing the optical quality factor using a millimeter sized and mechanically polished bulk single crystal disk resonator.^{44} Compared with nano and micronscale modulators, its large size and surface area should facilitate a moreefficient coupling to the cold bath and its large heat capacity is expected to result in slow heating rates in pulsed operation schemes. Compared with previous work^{42} the disk is clamped in the center to avoid disk damage, air gaps, and to minimize potential piezoelectric clamping losses. Importantly, finiteelement modeling shows that a sufficient mode overlap and bandwidth at moderate pump powers can still be achieved using a combination of lithographically defined thinfilm superconducting electrodes together with carefully shaped WGM disc crosssections.
In the main part of the paper, we develop the theory to analytically predict the entanglement properties under realistic conditions such as finite temperature and asymmetric waveguide couplings. We show that it is feasible to deterministically generate MHz bandwidth continuous variable (CV) entanglement between the outputs of a pumped optical and a cold microwave resonator via spontaneous parametric downconversion. We also present its performance for direct conversionbased and teleportationbased communication, as quantified by the quantum state transfer fidelities for a set of typical quantum states. Our results indicate that the proposed entangler could serve as a repeater node to enable longdistance hybrid quantum networks.^{45} The developed theory results are applicable to any triply resonant electrooptic transducer implementation.
Results
Hamiltonian of the system
As shown schematically in Fig. 1, we consider a WGM cavity electrooptic modulator containing a \({\chi }^{(2)}\) nonlinear medium that generates a nonlinear interaction between a single microwave cavity mode with frequency \(\Omega\) and two modes of the WGM optical resonator corresponding to the central and the Stokessideband mode with resonance frequencies \({\omega }_{c}\) and \({\omega }_{s}\), respectively. Such a single sideband situation can be achieved by making use of mode couplings of different polarization that lead to an asymmetry of the WGM resonator’s FSR.^{42} The total Hamiltonian describing the system is \(\hat{H}={\hat{H}}_{0}+{\hat{H}}_{{\rm{int}}}\) in which the free energy Hamiltonian is^{32,33,34,38,42}
and the interaction Hamiltonian is
where \({\hat{a}}_{c}\), \({\hat{a}}_{s}\) are the annihilation operators of the central and Stokessideband modes of the optical resonator, respectively, whereas \({\hat{a}}_{\Omega }\) is the annihilation operator of the microwave cavity and \(g\) describes the coupling strength between the microwave and the two optical modes. Moving to the interaction picture with respect to \({\hat{H}}_{0}\) and setting \(\Omega ={\omega }_{c}{\omega }_{s}\), the system Hamiltonian reduces to
The second part of this Hamiltonian describes a threewave mixing process during which an optical photon with frequency \({\omega }_{s}\) and a microwave photon with frequency \(\Omega\) are generated by annihilating an optical photon with frequency \({\omega }_{c}\).
The coupling strength \(g\) is determined by the spatial mode overlap of the electric fields \({E}_{k}=\sqrt{\hslash {\omega }_{k}/(2{\epsilon }_{k}{V}_{k})}{\psi }_{k}(r,\theta ,\phi )\) and the \({\chi }^{(2)}\) nonlinearity of the material:^{38,42}
where \({\epsilon }_{0}\) is the vacuum permittivity, \({\psi }_{k}(r,\theta ,\phi )\) the field distribution functions, \({\epsilon }_{k}\) and \({V}_{k}\) are the relative permittivity and mode volume corresponding to mode \(k\) with \(k=s,c,\Omega\), respectively. The field distributions can be written in terms of the crosssection \({\Psi }_{k}(r,\theta )\) and azimuthal distribution \({e}^{i{m}_{k}\phi }\) as \({\psi }_{k}(r,\theta ,\phi )={\Psi }_{k}(r,\theta ){e}^{i{m}_{k}\phi }\). The integral over the azimuthal variable \(\phi\) is nonzero only if the relation \({m}_{c}={m}_{s}+{m}_{\Omega }\) is fulfilled. This condition, known as phase matching or angular momentum conservation, returns a real value of the coupling constant \(g\) presented in Eq. (4).
We can linearize the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) by limiting our analysis to the case where the center mode of the optical cavity is pumped resonantly by a strong coherent field at frequency \({\omega }_{p}={\omega }_{c}\). In this condition the optical mode \({\hat{a}}_{c}\) can be treated as classical complex number \({\alpha }_{p}=\langle {\hat{a}}_{c}\rangle\) and the linearized Hamiltonian becomes
Here for simplicity we renamed the optical mode \({\hat{a}}_{s}\to {\hat{a}}_{o}\). The above Hamiltonian describes a parametric downconversion process that is responsible for entangling the microwave mode \(\Omega\) with the optical mode \({\omega }_{o}\). In a lossless system, this interaction could lead to an exponential growth of the energy stored in both modes and consequently lead to photon amplification of each mode.
Device implementation
The proposed system is based on a 3Dmicrowave cavity enclosing a mmsized LiNbO\({}_{3}\) WGM resonator with major radius \(R\) operating at millikelvin temperature. At optical wavelengths, these mechanically polished resonators offer materiallimited internal quality factors \({Q}_{i,o}\gtrsim 3.3\times 1{0}^{8}\)^{46} and strong lateral confinement, reflected in the small optical mode crosssection \({\Psi }_{k}(r,\theta )\), on the order of tens of µm^{2}.^{47} In the microwave regime, LiNbO\({}_{3}\) exhibits an internal quality factor \({Q}_{i,\Omega }\gtrsim 1{0}^{4}\) in the Xband at millikelvin temperatures^{48} and a high electrooptic coefficiet r_{33} = 31 pm/V at 9 GHz.^{49,50}
The large wavelength \({\lambda }_{\Omega }\gtrsim R\) of the microwave field causes considerable reduction of the spatial opticalmicrowave mode overlap, leading to a small microwaveoptical mode coupling \(g\). The proposed system tackles this problem by coupling the optical resonator to a metallic cavity. This hybrid device involves a monolithic LiNbO\({}_{3}\) resonator clamped at the center of a microwave cavity by two thin rods machined for example from aluminum or copper as depicted in Fig. 2a. The LiNbO\({}_{3}\) resonator is coated with a thinfilm of superconductor such as Al or NbTiN forming the upper and lower electrodes of a capacitor for the microwave cavity. The thinfilm electrodes can be realized by evaporating metal on the full resonator’s surface followed by optical lithography on the resonator’s rim. The photoresist is developed and the unprotected thin metal band is etched. An interesting feature of this resonator fabrication process is the possibility to vary the gap size \(d\) between the upper and lower electrodes independent of the disk thickness. Gaps from 1 mm down to 10 µm are feasible by adjusting the focus of the lithography laser. This results in a strong confinement of the microwave electric field at the resonator’s wedgeshaped rim, enhancing the mode overlap between the optical and microwave mode as shown in Fig. 2b–d, and increasing the coupling constant \(g\) (see Eq. (4). In addition, the enclosing cavity offers a degree of freedom to control the microwave mode’s spatial distribution \({\psi }_{\Omega }(\overrightarrow{r})\), the microwave resonance frequency \(\Omega\) and its coupling to a microwave coaxial waveguide \({\kappa }_{e,\Omega }\).
To achieve opticalmicrowave mode interaction the energy and azimuthal momentum conservations must be fulfilled. For this system, we use and isolate two neighboring optical modes with angular number \({m}_{s}=m\) and \({m}_{c}=m+1\), spectrally separated by a FSR as experimentally shown in ref. ^{42} The energy conservation is fulfilled by matching the microwave mode frequency \(\Omega\) to the optical FSR. In addition, the microwave mode field distribution must have one oscillation around the resonator’s rim (\(m=1\)) to fulfill the angular momentum conservation. We assume the center frequency of the WGM resonator with mode number \({m}_{c}=m+1\) is coherently pumped via the evanescant coupling with a dielectric prism, which also serves as the outcoupling port for the created Stokessideband with mode number \({m}_{s}=m\). On the microwave side, a pin coupler can be used to couple the microwave photons into a coaxial waveguide as depicted in Fig. 2a. Here, the WGM resonator has an optical FSR of \(9\) GHz, corresponding to the typical frequency range of superconducting qubits and readout resonators.
Numerical analysis of the system
Figure 2c, d show the numerical simulation of the electric field distribution of the microwave and optical modes, respectively. The microwave electric field is constant in the region enclosing the optical field. We simulate a \(z\)cut LiNbO\({}_{3}\) WGM resonator with major radius \(R=2.5\) mm, height \(H=0.5\) mm, and side curvature \({R}_{c}=0.1\) mm, enclosed by a cylindrical microwave cavity with diameter 5.5 and 1.3 mm hight. The optical WGM crosssection (FWHM) is analytically calculated to be 7.6 × 17.8 µm^{2}.^{47} For the electric fields along the \(\hat{z}\) direction, the integral term in Eq. (4) results in:^{42}
where \({n}_{e}\) is the extraordinary optical refractive index of LiNbO\({}_{3}\) and \({E}_{\Omega ,z}(\vec{r}_{o})\) is the \(z\)component of the single photon microwave electric field at the position \({\overrightarrow{r}}\!\!_{o}\) of the optical mode. The \(1/\sqrt{2}\) correction term is owing to the nature of the microwave stationary wave, which can be seen as two contrapropagating waves, one of which propagates opposite to the optical mode and therefore does not interact with it.
Figure 3a shows the simulated microwaveoptical coupling rate \(g\) as a function of the electrodes gap size \(d\). From a parametric fit to the simulated values, we find the dependency of coupling rate \(g\) to the gap size \(d\) scales with \(g \sim {d}^{0.8}\). Figure 3b shows the internal quality factor of the optical resonator \({Q}_{i,o}\) versus the gap size \(d\). By decreasing the gap size, \({Q}_{i,o}\) decreases exponentially because the optical mode has a Gaussian envelope \({\Psi }_{k} \sim \exp (0.5\cdot {z}^{2}/{\sigma }_{z}^{2})\) with σ_{z} = 7.6 µm along the \(\hat{z}\) axis. For this simulation we consider aluminum electrodes, which exhibit a large imaginary index at optical frequencies^{51,52} and therefore impose an optical loss for small electrode distances. In addition, optical photons can break the cooper pairs in the superconducting electrodes, degrading the quality factor of the microwave cavity. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the spatial overlap between the optical mode and the superconducting electrodes and reduce the optical surface scattering. For moderately sized gaps the optical quality factor reaches the limit of \({Q}_{i,o} \sim 5\times 1{0}^{8}\), which is backed by our experimental results at room temperature without the metal electrodes and expected to be the materiallimited absorption of LiNbO\({}_{3}\).
We have also carried out characterization measurements of the microwave properties of the proposed system shown in Fig. 2 using an aluminum cavity and thinfilm aluminum metallization, which yielded values \({Q}_{i,\Omega } \sim 3\times 1{0}^{3}\) for a clamping rod diameter of 0.5 mm. This value, which we use for our further modeling, is at least a factor 4 below the reported material limit of LiNbO\({}_{3}\) and we attribute this to other loss sources such as frequencydependent defect states,^{48} piezoelectric mechanical,^{53} cavity seam,^{54} and surface losses.^{55}
The multiphoton cooperativity \(C=\frac{4{n}_{p}{g}^{2}}{{\kappa }_{o}{\kappa }_{\Omega }}\) is the figure of merit in electrooptic systems. Here, \({n}_{p}= {\alpha }_{p}{ }^{2}=\frac{4{\eta }_{o}}{{\kappa }_{o}}\frac{{P}_{p}}{\hslash {\omega }_{p}}\) is the intracavity photon number owing to the resonant optical pump power \({P}_{p}\), \({\kappa }_{\Omega (o)}={\kappa }_{e,\Omega (o)}+{\kappa }_{i,\Omega (o)}\) is total loss of the microwave (optical) cavity, whereas \({\kappa }_{e,\Omega (o)}\) and \({\kappa }_{i,\Omega (o)}\) are the extrinsic and the intrinsic damping rates of the microwave (optical) cavity, respectively. Here, we defined the normalized cavity to waveguide coupling strength as \({\eta }_{\Omega (o)}={\kappa }_{e,\Omega (o)}/{\kappa }_{\Omega (o)}\) of the microwave (optical) resonator. Under the critically coupled condition \({\eta }_{\Omega }={\eta }_{o}=1/2\), the cooperativity for a given pump power is given as
with the intrinsic quality factor \({Q}_{i,\Omega (o)}=\Omega ({\omega }_{o})/{\kappa }_{i,\Omega ({\omega }_{o})}\) of the microwave (optical) mode. In Fig. 3c, we plot the microwaveoptical cooperativity \(C\) as a function of the electrode gap size \(d\) and for a fixed optical pump power of 10 µW. This plot shows that the cooperativity increases by decreasing the gap size and it reaches its maximum value at d ~ 50 µm where \({Q}_{i,o}\) starts to saturate due to material absorption. To reach strong multiphoton microwaveoptical interaction requires a cooperativity close to 1, which can be achieved by increasing the optical pump power to \({\mathrm{P}}_{p}\,=\,25.4\,\upmu {\mathrm{W}}\).
It is important to note that this is lower than the cooling power of commercial cryostats at ~30 mK and that in practice only a small fraction of it would be dissipated into the cold stage of the dilution refrigerator, whereas the majority of the pump field is outcoupled together with the generated signal via an optical fiber, e.g., by using a diamond prism with a basis angle of \(63.{5}^{\circ }\). Nevertheless, in the following we will also consider the situation where the EO modulator is operated at the still plate at 800 mK and connected to a cold superconducting circuit at a few mK via a lowloss superconducting waveguide. The still stage of a modern dilution refrigerator offers cooling powers of at least 20 mW and the higher temperature offers higher thermal conductivities to connect the modulator more efficiently to the cold bath. Table 1 summarizes the full set of system parameters that will be used in the following unless otherwise stated.
System dynamics
In this subsection, we study the quantum dynamics of the proposed electrooptic modulator system presented in the previous section. We specifically focus on the conditions under which one can efficiently correlate and entangle optical and microwave fields using electrooptic interaction. The dynamics of the system can be fully described using the quantum Langevin treatment in which we add the damping and noise terms to the Heisenberg equations for the system operators associated with Eq. (5). The resulting quantum Langevin equations for the intracavity optical and microwave modes are
where \(G=\sqrt{{n}_{p}}g{e}^{i{\phi }_{p}}\) is the multiphoton interaction rate and \({\phi }_{p}\) the phase of the pump. We also introduce the zeromean microwave (optical) input noises given by \({\hat{a}}_{e,\Omega (o)}\) and \({\hat{a}}_{i,\Omega (o)}\), obeying the following correlation functions
with \(k=e,i\) where \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega (o)}^{e}\) and \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega (o)}^{i}\) are the equilibrium mean thermal photon numbers of the microwave (optical) fields.
The Eqs. (8a) and (8b) describe the dynamics of the system and reveal the origin of the opticalmicrowave intracavity correlation, which arises from the cross dependency of microwave operator \({\hat{a}}_{\Omega }\) on the optical mode operator \({\hat{a}}_{o}\), and vice versa. However, in this paper we are interested in generating nonclassical correlation and entanglement between itinerant electromagnetic modes, which can be calculated using the standard input–output theory.^{56} We first solve the Eqs. (8a) and (8b) by moving to the Fourier domain to obtain the microwave and optical resonator variables. Then, substituting the solutions of Eqs. (8a) and (8b) into the corresponding input–output formula for the cavities’ variables, i.e., \({\hat{a}}_{\Omega (o)}^{{\rm{out}}}=\sqrt{{\kappa }_{e,\Omega (o)}}{\hat{a}}_{\Omega (o)}{\hat{a}}_{e,\Omega (o)}\), we obtain
where \({\hat{{\rm{S}}}}^{{\rm{out}}}(\omega )={[{a}_{o}^{{\rm{out}}}(\omega ),{a}_{\Omega }^{{\rm{out}}\dagger }(\omega )]}^{{\rm{T}}}\) is the output field matrix. The transformation matrix \({\it{D}}(\omega )\) is given by:^{34}
with \(M(\omega )=(i\omega +{\kappa }_{o}/2)(i\omega +{\kappa }_{\Omega }/2) G{ }^{2}\), \(\Delta {\kappa }_{\{o,\Omega \}}={\kappa }_{e,\{o,\Omega \}}{\kappa }_{i,\{o,\Omega \}}\) and \({\hat{{\rm{S}}}}^{{\rm{in}}}(\omega )\) is the input noise matrix \({[{\hat{a}}_{e,o},{\hat{a}}_{i,o},{\hat{a}}_{e,\Omega }^{\dagger },{\hat{a}}_{i,\Omega }^{\dagger }]}^{{\rm{T}}}\). The photon generation rate of the traveling output fields of the electrooptic modulator owing to parametric downconversion \({n}^{{\rm{out}}}=\langle {a}_{j}^{{\rm{out}}\dagger }(\omega ){a}_{j}^{{\rm{out}}}(\omega )\rangle\) can be calculated using Eq. (10)
The bandwidth of the emitted radiation is
which decreases as a function of \(C\) and approaches zero for \(C=1\).
In Fig. 4a, we show the output spectra of the microwave and optical cavities with respect to the response frequency \(\omega\) for the experimentally accessible parameters shown in Table 1 at a cooperativity \(C=0.3\) corresponding to a pump power of \({\mathrm{P}}_{p}\,=\,19.2\,\upmu {\mathrm{W}}\). Even for such low pump powers we obtain readily detectable signal output powers on the order of 1 photon per second per Hertz. Owing to the asymmetric waveguidecavity/resonator coupling \({\eta }_{o}\,\ne\, {\eta }_{\Omega }\), the output photon numbers are not balanced but it is worth noting that the bandwidth is identical even though the dissipation rates \({\kappa }_{\Omega }\) and \({\kappa }_{o}\) are very different. The output spectra at an elevated temperature of the cavity baths T_{b} = 800 mK is related to the thermal photon numbers \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega (o)}^{i}={(\exp (\hslash \Omega (o)/{k}_{B}{T}_{b})1)}^{1}\). Here, we assume a cold waveguide \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega (o)}^{e} \sim 0\), which can be realized with superconducting cables connected to the base temperature of the cryostat. As expected, the output of the microwave cavity increases considerably owing to an increase of the modulator thermal noise \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega }^{i}\). Although the photon occupation of the optical mode \({\overline{n}}_{o}^{i}\) is negligible one can see that the thermal microwave noise leads to parametrically amplified optical noise at the resonator output at elevated temperatures.
Figure 4b shows the integrated optical and microwave output photon flux versus multiphoton cooperativity \(C\). The photon numbers are increasing with \(C\) and diverge abruptly as the cooperativity approaches unity \(C\to 1\). In this limit the system reaches its instability and the linearization approximation used in the Hamiltonian Eq. (5) is not valid anymore. Therefore, for the remainder of the paper we study the generation of microwaveoptics entanglement, conversion and quantum state transfer in the parameter range \(C\,{<}\,1\).
Twomode squeezing
First, we verify the generation of the twomode squeezing at the outputs of the microwave cavity and optical resonator. For this reason, it is convenient to define the field quadratures in terms of the annihilation and creation operators
where
These quadratures satisfy the bosonic commutator \([{\hat{q}}_{k},{\hat{p}}_{k}]=i\) and we define the filtered output operators
where we assume the filter function \({{\rm{f}}}_{k}(\omega ,\sigma )\) with bandwidth \({\sigma }_{k}\) (\(k=o,\Omega\)) is acting on the output of each cavity. Note that the vacuum noise is \(1/2\) for the quadratures defined in Eq. (14).
In order to quantify entanglement, we first determine the covariance matrix (CM) of our system, which can be expressed as^{13}
where \(\Delta {\hat{{\rm{x}}}}_{k}={\hat{{\rm{x}}}}_{k}\langle {\hat{{\rm{x}}}}_{k}\rangle\) and \(\hat{{\bf{x}}}={[{\hat{q}}_{o},{\hat{p}}_{o},{\hat{q}}_{\Omega },{\hat{p}}_{\Omega }]}^{{\rm{T}}}\). Using the scattering matrix defined in Eq. (10) to calculate the second order moments of the output quadratures Eq. (15) at zero bandwidth \(\sigma =0\), we can compute the CM of the system in the steady state
where \({\boldsymbol{I}}_{2\times 2}\) is the identity matrix, \({\textbf{Z}}={\rm{diag}}(1,1)\) and \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega }={\kappa }_{i,\Omega }{\overline{n}}_{\Omega }^{i}({T}_{b})/{\kappa }_{\Omega }\) is the microwave thermal mode occupancy. Here we assume a cold waveguide \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega (o)}^{e}=0\) as well as \({\overline{n}}_{o}^{i}=0\). For \(C=0\) the CM Eq. (18) takes on the values of the vacuum noise V = I_{4 × 4}/2 and the CM diverges at \(C=1\).
The existence of microwaveoptical entanglement can be demonstrated using the quasiprobability Wigner function, which can be written in terms of the CM Eq. (18) and the optical and mic rowave quadratures \({\hat{q}}_{k}\) and \({\hat{p}}_{k}\)
Figure 5a shows the Wigner function projected into the 4 different quadratures subspaces \(\{{p}_{o},{q}_{o}\}\), \(\{{p}_{\Omega },{q}_{\Omega }\}\), \(\{{q}_{\Omega },{q}_{o}\}\), and \(\{{p}_{\Omega },{p}_{o}\}\) where the complementary variables are integrated. For reference, we also plot the Wigner function of the vacuum state V = I_{4 × 4}/2 (blue circle) corresponding to zero cooperativity \(C=0\). The singlemode projections \(\{{p}_{o},{q}_{o}\}\) and \(\{{p}_{\Omega },{q}_{\Omega }\}\) show an increase of the noise fluctuations, indicating the phaseindependent amplification of the vacuum noise at the output of each cavity. The \(\{{q}_{\Omega },{q}_{o}\}\) and \(\{{p}_{\Omega },{p}_{o}\}\) projections on the other hand, demonstrate the microwaveoptical crosscorrelation, originating from the electrooptic interaction, whose fluctuations in specific direction are squeezed below the quantum limit (blue line) and antisqueezed in the perpendicular direction. In this plot, the red (blue) line indicates a drop by \({e}^{1}\) of its maximum for the parameters \(C=0.3\ (C=0)\) at \({T}_{b}=0\). Unlike the ideal symmetric twomode squeezer (\({V}_{11}={V}_{22}={V}_{33}={V}_{44}\)) whose quadrature squeezing appears along diagonal axes with squeezing angle \(\pm 4{5}^{\circ }\) (black dashed lines), in general the electrooptic system is an asymmetric squeezer (\({V}_{11}={V}_{22}\,\ne\, {V}_{33}={V}_{44}\)) if \({\eta }_{o}\,\ne\, {\eta }_{\Omega }\). The squeezing angle is then given by \(\tan (2\Theta )=\pm2{V}_{13}/ {V}_{33}{V}_{11}\) and its value is 39.34\({}^{\circ }\) for the system’s parameters in Fig. 5a.
In Fig. 5b, we show the squeezed \(\Delta {q}_{}^{2}\) and antisqueezing \(\Delta {q}_{+}^{2}\) quadrature variances as well as their product \(\Delta {q}_{}\Delta {q}_{+}\), which is related to the purity \({\mathcal{P}}=1/(2\Delta {q}_{}\Delta {q}_{+})\) of Gaussian states,^{57} as a function of the cooperativity \(C\). The variances are given as
with \(\Upsilon =4\sqrt{{\eta }_{o}{\eta }_{\Omega }C}(1+C)\) and \(\varepsilon ={(1C)}^{2}\). Larger \(C\) gives smaller \(\Delta {q}_{}\) (more squeezing) and larger \(\Delta {q}_{+}\) (more amplification) at the outputs of the cavities. In the ideal case \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }=1\) and for \(0\,{<}\,C\,{<}\,1\) the above equation reduces to
which satisfies the minimum quadrature uncertainty \(\Delta {q}_{}\Delta {q}_{+}=1/2\). Moreover, we can define the electrooptic squeezing parameter as \({r}_{{\rm{EO}}}=\mathrm{ln}\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{C}}{1\sqrt{C}}\right)\) for this configuration. Owing to the optical and microwave internal losses \({\eta }_{k}\,<\,1\) (\(k=o,\Omega\)) the quadrature variances deviate from the uncertainty principle \(\Delta {q}_{}\Delta {q}_{+}>1/2\) in the proposed device as shown in Fig. 5b.
Microwaveoptical entanglement
We are interested in the entanglement properties of the radiation leaving the system and we therefore study the bipartite microwaveoptical entanglement, which can be quantified using the logarithmic negativity^{58,59}
where
is the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partial transpose of the CM Eq. (18) with \(\tilde{\Delta }={V}_{11}^{2}+{V}_{33}^{2}+2{V}_{13}^{2}\). In Fig. 6a we plot \({E}_{{\mathcal{N}}}\) as a function of the cooperativity for two different temperatures 10 mK (solid line) and 800 mK (dashed line). One can see that a significant amount of microwaveoptical entanglement is generated \({E}_{{\mathcal{N}}} \sim 1\), even for moderate values of \(C\), increasing with higher cooperativity and decreasing significantly at elevated bath temperatures \({T}_{b}\). In the low temperature limit \({\overline{n}}_{\Omega }\simeq 0\) and for the waveguide coupling matching \(\eta = {\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }\), the logarithmic negativity (17) reduces to
We also calculate the distribution rate of the entangled fields emitted from the electrooptic system, which is given by
where we introduce the entanglement of formation
with \({x}_{m}=({\tilde{d}}_{}^{2}+1/4)/(2{\tilde{d}}_{})\). From the obtained output operators in Eq. (16) with the rectangular filter \({{\rm{f}}}_{k}(\omega ,\sigma )=H ({\rm{BW}}/2 \omega  )/\sqrt{{\rm{BW}}}\), we compute the average CM over the emission bandwidth, which is then used inside Eq. (26) returning the average entanglement of formation \({\overline{E}}_{F}\).
Figure 6b shows the total emission rate of entangled radiation as well as the bandwidth of the photon emission as a function of cooperativity \(C\). For the considered system parameters given in Table 1 (blue solid line) a maximum value of 0.26 Mebit/s is reached at \(C=0.25\) with a photon emission bandwidth of 0.6 MHz at \({\mathrm{P}}_{p}\,=\,16\,\upmu {\mathrm{W}}\). The mosteffective method to increase the BW and entanglement rate is to increase the optical waveguide coupling \({\kappa }_{e,o}\). The red lines in Fig. 6b show the situation for \({\eta }_{o}=0.8\), yielding rates of \(1.17\) Mebit/s at \(\sim\!\!1.34\) MHz bandwidth at \(C=0.27\), which would now require a pump power of (\({\mathrm{P}}_{p}\,=\,68\,\upmu {\mathrm{W}}\), a value that is still feasible at the mixing chamber temperature stage of a dilution refrigerator. Coherent quantum information \({\mathrm {I}}\) quantifies the lower bound of the distillable entanglement. \({I}_{\Omega }={I}_{o}=0.24\) Mebit/s is maximal at \(C=0.27\) and calculated according to refs ^{13,60} at low temperature in the symmetric case.
At the significantly elevated bath temperatures of \({T}_{b}=800\) mK (dashed lines) the maximum entanglement rates drop by about a factor 5 in both coupling situations. It should be noted that further increasing the coupling to a cold waveguide on the microwave side \({\eta }_{\Omega }\simeq 1\) or alternatively finding a way to lower the internal losses of the microwave mode, would result in a significantly smaller effective system temperature. Larger waveguide coupling strengths and higher available pump powers at the still stage of a dilution refrigerator together with higher thermal conductivities could result in significantly higher entanglement rates than discussed in this paper which focusses on currently accessible device parameters. In all cases the entanglement rate approaches zero at \(C=1\), following the decrease in photon emission bandwidth, see also Eq. (13).
Teleportationbased quantum state transfer
An important feature of a hybrid quantum network is the ability to transfer quantum states between different nodes. The quality of the state transfer is characterized by the fidelity^{61}
where \({W}_{{\rm{in}}}\) and \({W}_{{\rm{out}}}\) are the initial and final Wigner functions of an unknown arbitrary quantum state before and after the transduction, respectively. For Gaussian states the fidelity simplifies to^{62}
with \({{\bf{x}}}^{{\rm{in}}}={({q}_{o(\Omega )}^{{\rm{in}}},{p}_{o(\Omega )}^{{\rm{in}}})}^{\rm{T}}\), \({{\bf{x}}}^{{\rm{out}}}={({q}_{o(\Omega )}^{{\rm{out}}},{p}_{o(\Omega )}^{{\rm{out}}})}^{\rm{T}}\) and \({{\bf{V}}}_{{\rm{F}}}=2{{\bf{V}}}_{{\rm{in}}}+2{{\bf{V}}}_{{\rm{out}}}\), where \({{\bf{V}}}_{{\rm{in,(out)}}}\) are the input and output covariance matrices following the definition given in Eq. (17).
We propose the bidirectional microwavetooptical quantum state transfer using the presented EO device as an EPR source in an unconditional CV teleportation scheme. Assuming the standard Braunstein–Kimble setup^{61,64} with ideal Bell measurements and classical information transfer as depicted in Fig. 7a, the state transfer fidelity for an unknown coherent squeezed state \(\left{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}}\right\rangle =\left\alpha ,r\right\rangle\) is given by
with \(\Delta {q}_{}\) explicitly given in Eq. (20). In the limit of \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }\) the fidelity for pure Gaussian states is reduced to:^{65}
where \({\textbf{A}}={V}_{11}{\textbf{I}}\), \({\textbf{B}}={V}_{33}{\textbf{I}}\), and \({\textbf{C}}={V}_{13}{\textbf{Z}}\). The fidelity Eq. (30) can be written in terms of the logarithmic negativity \({E}_{{\mathcal{N}}}\) generated using the EO device
The fidelity in Eq. (31) is independent of the coherent state amplitude \(\alpha\) due to the assumed ideal measurement of the quadratures \({q}_{}\) and \({p}_{+}\), and a lossless classical information transfer in this protocol. The bandwidth of the teleportation is given by the photon emission bandwidth shown in the inset of Fig. 6b.
In Fig. 7b, we show the fidelity for the coherent squeezed input state \(\left{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}}\right\rangle =\left\alpha ,r\right\rangle =\left2,1\right\rangle\) as a function of the multiphoton cooperativity \(C\) for the system parameters in Table 1 at zero temperature (blue solid line), at 800 mK (blue dashed line) as well as for a lossless system \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }=1\) (blue dashdotted line). The lower bound of the fidelity is set by the classical limit \({F}_{{\rm{TE}}}^{{\rm{cl}}}={e}^{r}/(1+{e}^{2r})\)^{66} valid for nonentangled microwave and optical radiation. The fidelity increases monotonically achieving its maximum value set by the minimum quadrature squeezing of the entanglement source \(\Delta {q}_{}^{2}=0.5\frac{{\eta }_{o}{\eta }_{\Omega }}{{\eta }_{o}+{\eta }_{\Omega }}\) as shown in Fig. 7b. An increased temperature leads to a significant reduction of the achievable state transfer fidelity. A fidelity of \(\sim\!\!1\) is achieved for a cooperativity close to 1 in the near lossless and perfectly overcoupled case. In this case the system thermalizes with the cold waveguide independent of its internal bath temperature.
Quantum state teleportation based on EO entanglement can be used also with nonGaussian states such as cat states that are readily available in superconducting circuits. Cat states are represented as a quantum superposition of two coherent states in the form \(N(\left\alpha \right\rangle +{e}^{i\phi }\left\alpha \right\rangle )\) with \(N=\sqrt{2+2\exp (2\alpha )\cos (\phi )}\). The state transfer fidelity using the proposed EO entanglement source is given by^{61}
In Fig. 7b, we show the teleportation fidelity of the cat state \(\left{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}}\right\rangle =\left\alpha \right\rangle \left\alpha \right\rangle =\left2\right\rangle \left2\right\rangle\) as a function of \(C\) for the system parameters in Table 1 at zero temperature (red solid line), at 800 mK (red dashed line) as well as for a lossless system \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }=1\) (red dashdotted line) where we consider \(\phi =\pi\). We find that the cat state transfer fidelities are lower compared with the coherent squeezed input state over the full range of parameters.
Conversionbased quantum state transfer
The EO system can also be used to directly convert the information between microwave and optical photons, schematically shown in Fig. 7c. This is achieved by driving the lower frequency optical mode in the same scheme as given in ref. ^{42,43} changing the nonlinear interaction Hamiltonian into the so called beam splitter Hamiltonian, allowing coherent frequency conversion between the microwave and optical modes following the equations of motion:
Using the input–output theory to calculate the outputs of the optical and microwave modes, we can infer the photon conversion efficiency between the traveling microwave and optical fields^{34}
over the bandwidth:^{47}
The conversion bandwidth BWC increases with the cooperativity as shown in Fig. 7d and for the case of rate matching \({\kappa }_{o}={\kappa }_{\Omega }=\kappa\) achieves the maximum value of \(\sqrt{2}\kappa\) for \(C=1\). For the coherent squeezed state \(\left\alpha ,r\right\rangle\) the fidelity of the direct state transduction is given by
where
\({\epsilon }_{2}=1+\cosh (2r)\), and \({\epsilon }_{3}=\frac{\sqrt{4{\eta }_{o}{\eta }_{\Omega }C}}{(1+C)}\).
Figure 7e shows the fidelity of state transfer for the squeezed coherent input state \(\left{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}}\right\rangle =\left2,1\right\rangle\) as a function of \(C\) for the system parameters in Table 1 at zero temperature (blue solid line), at 800 mK (blue dashed line) as well as for a lossless system \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }=1\) (blue dashdotted line). The lower bound of the fidelity (\(C=0\)) is given by the overlap of the initial state and the vacuum state set by \(\frac{2{e}^{r2 \alpha { }^{2}}}{1+{e}^{2r}}\). In comparison with the teleportation scheme shown in Fig. 7b, the fidelity in direct transduction shown in Fig. 7e is significantly lower for this state. In general for direct conversion the fidelity is strongly dependent on the field amplitude \( \alpha \), which can be seen from the numerator of Eq. (36) in the case \({\eta }_{o(\Omega )}<1\). However, it is important to note that many quantum communication protocols work with \( \alpha  \le 1\),^{14,67,68} a regime where both schemes offer more comparable fidelities.
The direct EO transducer can also be used to convert nonGaussian cat states between microwave and optical fields. For a real \(\alpha\) the fidelity of the conversion is
with \({\epsilon }_{4}=(1+\cos (\phi ){e}^{2{\alpha }^{2}})(1+\cos (\phi ){e}^{2{\alpha }^{2}{\epsilon }_{3}^{2}})\) and \({\epsilon }_{5}=1+\frac{8{\eta }_{\Omega }{\overline{n}}_{\Omega }}{{(1+C)}^{2}}\), and the lower bound of this fidelity given by \((1+\cos (\phi ))/({e}^{{\alpha }^{2}}+{e}^{{\alpha }^{2}}\cos (\phi ))\). In Fig. 7e we plot the conversion fidelity for the cat state \(\left{\psi }_{{\rm{in}}}\right\rangle =\left2\right\rangle \left2\right\rangle\) as a function of \(C\) for the system parameters in Table 1 at zero temperature (red solid line), at 800 mK (red dashed line) as well as for a lossless system \({\eta }_{o}={\eta }_{\Omega }=1\) (red dashdotted line). We can compare the performance of the two working transduction schemes for the quantum state transfer in electrooptic devices in Fig. 7b, e. Although teleportation performs better for the coherent squeezed state both with and without waveguide coupling losses, for the cat state direct transduction performs better in a broad range \(C\,{>}\,0.2\) except for elevated temperatures. It should also be pointed out that the bandwidth of the state transfer is generally higher for direct conversion schemes \({\rm{BWC}}\,{>}\,{\rm{BW}}\) as seen in Figs. 6b and 7d.
The most efficient electrooptic system yet reported achieved \(C=0.075\) with waveguide coupling rates \({\eta }_{o}=0.31\) and \({\eta }_{\Omega }=0.26\) at an effective temperature of 2.1 K.^{43} Assuming that the waveguides can be thermalized to low mK temperatures, the fidelities for a state \(\left\alpha =2,r=1\right\rangle\) are \(1{0}^{3}\) and 0.41 for direct transduction and teleportation, respectively. On the other hand, the fidelity for an odd cat state with \(\alpha =2\) are 0.09 and 0.25 for direct transduction and teleportation schemes, respectively. Our analysis showed that the proposed device should be able to outperform the state of the art with pump powers that are about \(1{0}^{3}\) times lower—a crucial aspect to be able to thermalize the system noise temperature to the cold environmental bath.
Discussion
We have presented an efficient and bright microwaveoptical entanglement source based on a triply resonant electrooptic interaction. We proposed a specific device geometry and material system, tested and simulated the most important system parameters and derived the theory describing the physics, entanglement generation and device performance for both teleportation and conversion type quantum state transfer.
The figures of merit for a quantum interface are efficiency and added noise, which both affect the achievable state transfer fidelity. But for any realistic application with finite lifetime qubits, the transducer bandwidth determines whether it is of practical use for quantum interconnects. Onchip integrated devices with small mode volume offer higher nonlinear coupling constants \(g\)^{43} compared with mmsized systems, but chiplevel integration so far comes at the expense of a lower internal optical \({Q}_{i,o}\),^{69} because surface qualities routinely achieved with mechanical polishing are difficult to realize in microfabrication processes. We have presented a new device geometry that offers the lowest losses without sacrificing coupling and as a result yields high predicted state transfer fidelities at practical bandwidth and realistic optical pump powers.
Our analysis shows that ultralow losses, a prerequisite to achieve very strong waveguide overcoupling, turns out to be the most important aspect for any resonant quantum interface to approach the high efficiency and fidelity needed in realistic applications. In comparison, increasing waveguide coupling rates requires higher pump powers to achieve the same cooperativity and dissipates more optical energy in the overcoupled regime, which leads to higher thermal bath occupations. Our analysis also pointed out the importance of low system temperatures, and mmsized devices not only offer lower optical absorption and scattering losses, which can easily break Cooper pairs in the superconducting microwave cavity, they also offer much larger volume, mass, heat capacity, and surface area for effective thermalization to the cold bath in continuous and pulsed driving schemes.
The presented triply resonant modulator offers a very promising way forward in the field of hybrid quantum systems, both when used for entanglement swapping or for direct conversion of quantum states. Experimental tests will show if the proposed scheme can be implemented as expected and tell us more about the important LiNbO\({}_{3}\) material parameters and heating rates at millikelvin temperatures. In the context of classical and quantum communication applications, with the above given parameters, our system could also work as an ultra efficient electrooptic modulator with a \({V}_{\pi }\) as low as 12.4 mV that can be used for frequency comb generation.^{70} Beyond that, we also expect applications of microwaveoptical entangled fields in the area of radio frequency sensing, low noise detection, and microwave quantum illumination.^{71,72}
Data availability
The numerical data generated in this work is available from the authors upon resonable request.
References
 1.
Schoelkopf, R. J. & Girvin, S. M. Wiring up quantum systems. Nature 451, 664–669 (2008).
 2.
Wendin, G. Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017).
 3.
Kurpiers, P. et al. Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons. Nature 558, 264–267 (2018).
 4.
Chou, K. S. et al. Deterministic teleportation of a quantum gate between two logical qubits. Nature 561, 368–373 (2018).
 5.
Pirandola, S. & Braunstein, S. L. Physics: Unite to build a quantum internet. Nature 532, 169–171 (2016).
 6.
Liao, S.K. et al. Satelliterelayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030501– (2018).
 7.
Maring, N. et al. Photonic quantum state transfer between a cold atomic gas and a crystal. Nature 551, 485 EP (2017).
 8.
Lambert, N. J., Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F. & Schwefel, H. G. L. Coherent conversion between microwave and optical photons – an overview of physical implementations (2019). arXiv: 1906.10255.
 9.
Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546–549 (2009).
 10.
Eichler, C. et al. Observation of twomode squeezing in the microwave frequency domain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113601 (2011).
 11.
Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100photon schrödinger cat states. Science 342, 607–610 (2013).
 12.
Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513–577 (2005).
 13.
Weedbrook, C. et al. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621–669 (2012).
 14.
Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282, 706–709 (1998).
 15.
Lee, N. et al. Teleportation of nonclassical wave packets of light. Science 332, 330–333 (2011).
 16.
Laurat, J., Coudreau, T., Treps, N., Maître, A. & Fabre, C. Conditional preparation of a quantum state in the continuous variable regime: generation of a subpoissonian state from twin beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 213601 (2003).
 17.
Pogorzalek, S. et al. Secure quantum remote state preparation of squeezed microwave states, Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2604 (2019).
 18.
Andrews, R. W. et al. Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nat. Phys. 10, 321–326 (2014).
 19.
Forsch, M. et al. Microwavetooptics conversion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state, Nature Physics, https://doi.org/10.1038/s4156701906737 (2019).
 20.
Barzanjeh, S. et al. Stationary entangled radiation from micromechanical motion. Nature 570, 480–483 (2019).
 21.
Genes, C., Mari, A., Tombesi, P. & Vitali, D. Robust entanglement of a micromechanical resonator with output optical fields. Phys. Rev. A. 78, 032316 (2008).
 22.
Stannigel, K., Rabl, P., Sørensen, A. S., Zoller, P. & Lukin, M. D. Optomechanical transducers for longdistance quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220501 (2010).
 23.
Barzanjeh, S., Vitali, D., Tombesi, P. & Milburn, G. J. Entangling optical and microwave cavity modes by means of a nanomechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. A. 84, 042342 (2011).
 24.
Barzanjeh, S., Abdi, M., Milburn, G. J., Tombesi, P. & Vitali, D. Reversible opticaltomicrowave quantum interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 130503 (2012).
 25.
Wang, Y.D. & Clerk, A. A. Reservoirengineered entanglement in optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 253601 (2013).
 26.
Tian, L. Robust photon entanglement via quantum interference in optomechanical interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233602 (2013).
 27.
Zhong, C. et al. Heralded generation and detection of entangled microwave–optical photon pairs. arXiv eprints arXiv:1901.08228 (2019).
 28.
Bochmann, J., Vainsencher, A., Awschalom, D. D. & Cleland, A. N. Nanomechanical coupling between microwave and optical photons. Nat. Phys. 9, 712–716 (2013).
 29.
Forsch, M. et al. Microwavetooptics conversion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum groundstate. arXiv:1812.07588v1 (2018).
 30.
Shao, L. et al. Microwavetooptical conversion using lithium niobate thinfilm acoustic resonators. arXiv:1907.08593 (2019).
 31.
Hisatomi, R. et al. Bidirectional conversion between microwave and light via ferromagnetic magnons. Phys. Rev. B. 93, 174427 (2016).
 32.
Matsko, A. B., Savchenkov, A. A., Ilchenko, V. S., Seidel, D. & Maleki, L. On fundamental quantum noises of whispering gallery mode electrooptic modulators. Opt. Express 15, 17401–17409 (2007).
 33.
Tsang, M. Cavity quantum electrooptics. Phys. Rev. A. 81, 063837 (2010).
 34.
Tsang, M. Cavity quantum electrooptics. II. Inputoutput relations between traveling optical and microwave fields. Phys. Rev. A. 84, 043845 (2011).
 35.
JaverzacGaly, C. et al. Onchip microwavetooptical quantum coherent converter based on a superconducting resonator coupled to an electrooptic microresonator. Phys. Rev. A. 94, 053815 (2016).
 36.
Soltani, M. et al. Efficient quantum microwavetooptical conversion using electrooptic nanophotonic coupled resonators. Phys. Rev. A. 96, 043808 (2017).
 37.
Cohen, D., HosseinZadeh, M. & Levi, A. Microphotonic modulator for microwave receiver. Electron. Lett. 37, 300–301 (2001).
 38.
Ilchenko, V. S., Savchenkov, A. A., Matsko, A. B. & Maleki, L. Whisperinggallerymode electrooptic modulator and photonic microwave receiver. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 20, 333–342 (2003).
 39.
Strekalov, D. V., Savchenkov, A. A., Matsko, A. B. & Yu, N. Efficient upconversion of subterahertz radiation in a highQ whispering gallery resonator. Opt. Lett. 34, 713–715 (2009).
 40.
Strekalov, D. V. et al. Microwave whisperinggallery resonator for efficient optical upconversion. Phys. Rev. A. 80, 033810–033815 (2009).
 41.
Botello, G. S.a et al. Sensitivity limits of millimeterwave photonic radiometers based on efficient electrooptic upconverters. Optica 5, 1210–1219 (2018).
 42.
Rueda, A. et al. Efficient microwave to optical photon conversion: an electrooptical realization. Optica 3, 597–604 (2016).
 43.
Fan, L. et al. Superconducting cavity electrooptics: a platform for coherent photon conversion between superconducting and photonic circuits. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4994 (2018).
 44.
Strekalov, D. V., Marquardt, C., Matsko, A. B., Schwefel, H. G. L. & Leuchs, G. Nonlinear and quantum optics with whispering gallery resonators. J. Optics 18, 123002 (2016).
 45.
Muralidharan, S. et al. Optimal architectures for long distance quantum communication. Sci. Rep. 6, 20463 (2016).
 46.
Leidinger, M. et al. Comparative study on three highly sensitive absorption measurement techniques characterizing lithium niobate over its entire transparent spectral range. Opt. Express 23, 21690–21705 (2015).
 47.
Sanchez, A. R. R. Resonant Electrooptics. doctoralthesis, FriedrichAlexanderUniversität ErlangenNürnberg (FAU) (2018).
 48.
Goryachev, M., Kostylev, N. & Tobar, M. E. Singlephoton level study of microwave properties of lithium niobate at millikelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. B. 92, 060406 (2015).
 49.
Weis, R. S. & Gaylord, T. K. Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure. Appl. Phys. A. 37, 191–203 (1985).
 50.
Wong, K., of Electrical Engineers, I. & service), I. I. Properties of Lithium Niobate. EMIS datareviews series (INSPEC/Institution of Electrical Engineers, 2002).
 51.
McPeak, K. M. et al. Plasmonic films can easily be better: rules and recipes. ACS Photonics 2, 326–333 (2015).
 52.
Rakić, A. D. Algorithm for the determination of intrinsic optical constants of metal films: application to aluminum. Appl. Opt. 34, 4755–4767 (1995).
 53.
Nguyen, D. T. et al. Ultrahigh qfrequency product for optomechanical disk resonators with a mechanical shield. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 241112 (2013).
 54.
Brecht, T. et al. Multilayer microwave integrated quantum circuits for scalable quantum computing. Npj Quant. Inform. 2, 16002 EP (2016).
 55.
Wenner, J. et al. Surface loss simulations of superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. Applied Physics Letters 99, 113513 (2011).
 56.
Gardiner, C. W. & Zoller, P. Quantum Noise (Springer Series in Synergetics, 2004).
 57.
Paris, M. G. A., Illuminati, F., Serafini, A. & De Siena, S. Purity of gaussian states: Measurement schemes and time evolution in noisy channels. Phys. Rev. A. 68, 012314 (2003).
 58.
Vidal, G. & Werner, R. F. Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A. 65, 032314 (2002).
 59.
Plenio, M. B. Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 090503 (2005).
 60.
Schumacher, B. & Nielsen, M. A. Quantum data processing and error correction. Phys. Rev. A. 54, 2629–2635 (1996).
 61.
Braunstein, S. L. & Kimble, H. J. Teleportation of continuous quantum variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 869–872 (1998).
 62.
Isar, A. Quantum fidelity for Gaussian states describing the evolution of open systems. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 160, 225–234 (2008).
 63.
Braunstein, S. L., Fuchs, C. A., Kimble, H. J. & van Loock, P. Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables. Phys. Rev. A. 64, 022321 (2001).
 64.
Pirandola, S., Eisert, J., Weedbrook, C., Furusawa, A. & Braunstein, S. L. Advances in quantum teleportation. Nat. Photonics 9, 641 EP (2015).
 65.
Fiurášek, J. Improving the fidelity of continuousvariable teleportation via local operations. Phys. Rev. A. 66, 012304 (2002).
 66.
Owari, M., Plenio, M. B., Polzik, E. S., Serafini, A. & Wolf, M. M. Squeezing the limit: quantum benchmarks for the teleportation and storage of squeezed states. N. J. Phys. 10, 113014 (2008).
 67.
Wittmann, C. et al. Demonstration of nearoptimal discrimination of optical coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210501 (2008).
 68.
Cook, R. L., Martin, P. J. & Geremia, J. M. Optical coherent state discrimination using a closedloop quantum measurement. Nature 446, 774 EP (2007).
 69.
Zhang, M., Wang, C., Cheng, R., ShamsAnsari, A. & Loncar, M. Monolithic ultrahighq lithium niobate microring resonator. Optica 4, 1536–1537 (2017).
 70.
Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F., Kumari, M., Leuchs, G. & Schwefel, H. G. L. Resonant electrooptic frequency comb. Nature 568, 378–381 (2019).
 71.
Barzanjeh, S. et al. Microwave quantum illumination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080503 (2015).
 72.
Barzanjeh, S., Pirandola, S., Vitali, D. & Fink, J. M. Experimental microwave quantum illumination. arXiv: 1908.03058 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria) and the European Research Council under grant agreement number 758053 (ERC StG QUNNECT). S.B. acknowledges support from the Marie Skłodowska Curie fellowship number 707438 (MSCIF SUPEREOM) and J.M.F. from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through BeyondC (F71), a NOMIS foundation research grant, and the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement number 732894 (FET Proactive HOT). We thank M. Wulf, H. Schwefel, and C. Marquardt for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
A.R., W.H., and J.M.F. conceived the project. Analytical analysis was done by A.R. and S.B., and FEM simulations by W.H. All authors contributed to the manuscript. S.B. and J.M.F. supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Alfredo Rueda or Johannes M. Fink.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rueda, A., Hease, W., Barzanjeh, S. et al. Electrooptic entanglement source for microwave to telecom quantum state transfer. npj Quantum Inf 5, 108 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4153401902205
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Coherent Conversion Between Microwave and Optical Photons—An Overview of Physical Implementations
Advanced Quantum Technologies (2020)