The extracellular matrix protects biofilm cells by reducing diffusion of antimicrobials. Tobramycin is an antibiotic used extensively to treat P. aeruginosa biofilms, but it is sequestered in the biofilm periphery by the extracellular negative charge matrix and loses its efficacy significantly. Dispersal of the biofilm extracellular matrix with enzymes such as DNase I is another promising therapy that enhances antibiotic diffusion into the biofilm. Here, we combine the charge neutralization of tobramycin provided by dextran-based single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCPNs) together with DNase I to break the biofilm matrix. Our study demonstrates that the SCPNs improve the activity of tobramycin and DNase I by neutralizing the ionic interactions that keep this antibiotic in the biofilm periphery. Moreover, the detailed effects and interactions of nanoformulations with extracellular matrix components were revealed through time-lapse imaging of the P. aeruginosa biofilms by laser scanning confocal microscopy with specific labeling of the different biofilm components.
Antibiotics are the principal therapy against acute bacterial infections. However, when a bacterial community attaches to a surface and grows as a biofilm, the resulting infections become chronic, and antibiotics are much less effective1. Bacteria form biofilms by building an extracellular matrix, which creates a physical and chemical barrier that is the leading cause of antibiotic inefficiency. This extracellular biofilm matrix comprises polysaccharides, lipids, proteins, and extracellular DNA (eDNA)2.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a bacterium that usually forms biofilms in lungs affected by cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Apart from being the primary cause of morbidity and mortality for these illnesses3, P. aeruginosa is usually involved in chronic wound infections4 and is the leading cause of microbial keratitis5. Pseudomonas biofilms are a public health concern6 as the leading cause of nosocomial infections7, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia8 and catheter-associated urinary tract infections9. Moreover, P. aeruginosa is frequently associated with other bacteria, and these coinfections worsen the outcome of the disease6,10. eDNA is a key part of the P. aeruginosa extracellular biofilm matrix, as it promotes bacterial adhesion on the surface in the early stages, maintains its structural stability in mature biofilms11,12,13 and increases the viscosity of sputum in CF patients14. eDNA was thought to be only a residual material of bacterial lysis until it was reported that the enzyme deoxyribonuclease (DNase I) inhibits biofilm formation and dissolves established biofilms15. Currently, this enzyme (commercially available by Genentech with the name of Pulmozyme) is used to treat CF patients via aerosol administration, and it aids mucus clearance by reducing the viscosity and improving antibiotic chemotherapy16.
When a pulmonary infection of P. aeruginosa becomes chronic and forms a biofilm, it frequently converts to a mucoid phenotype by overproducing the anionic polysaccharide alginate in the extracellular matrix17. Alginate protects bacteria from the immune system by inhibiting the complement system and reducing phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages. Together with eDNA, this negatively charged polysaccharide binds to a positively charged antibiotic, thus diminishing antibiotic diffusion throughout the biofilm18,19,20.
Drug nanocarriers can be used to effectively overcome these barriers and transport the drug to the site of interest. Nanoparticles protect the antimicrobial agent from degradation or deactivation, prevent interactions between the drug and biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and release the antibiotic locally and in a controlled manner to enhance antimicrobial activity.
Rational design of nanocarriers for pulmonary administration is key to reaching the biofilm resulting from a lung infection and delivering the cargo to the site of infection. Previous studies have demonstrated that to cross the mucus layer surrounding the infection, the size and surface charge of the delivery system are critical. Nanoparticles smaller than 500 nm in diameter and neutral or negatively charged are considered the best candidates21,22,23,24. However, for treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilms, it has been shown that the diffusion rate is size-dependent, and a nanosystem size below 100 nm is crucial25. Moreover, the mobility and diffusion rate of negatively charged nanoparticles are higher than those of positively charged nanoparticles, since the latter are retained by the anionic eDNA in the EPS26 via electrostatic interactions.
The most studied polymeric nanoparticles are based on chitosan and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), among others. The biocompatibility, degradability, and antimicrobial nature of chitosan make it a promising vector, but its hydrophobicity, which promotes aggregation under biological conditions, hinders its use. On the other hand, PLGA nanoparticles have the disadvantage of generating acidic degradation products and exhibiting low encapsulation efficiencies. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that PLGA loaded with ciprofloxacin/DNase I and colistin considerably reduced biofilm formation27,28. However, in both cases, the relatively small amount of antibiotic encapsulated, i.e., not higher than 1 wt%, indicates the need for administration of a very high concentration of the nanoformulation dose, which might jeopardize nebulization and rule out clinical use as a therapy for chronically infected patients.
Recently, single-chain polymer nanoparticles (SCPNs) based on dextran natural polysaccharides have been used to carry antimicrobial peptides to fight infections from antimicrobial-resistant bacteria29. SCPNs30,31,32,33,34,35 are obtained by collapsing a single polymer chain to form small nanoparticles with sizes generally reported to be below 20 nm, which are comparable to those of proteins and viruses. Functionalization can be readily modulated during or after production. Dextran-based SCPNs have shown ideal characteristics for use as nanocarriers in imaging and immunotherapy, as they are size-controlled, biocompatible, biodegradable, and water-dispersible36,37. Due to their small hydrodynamic sizes, homogenous lung distribution was observed by SPECT-CT after intratracheal administration using a Penn Century Microsprayer® aerosolizer, indicating that these SCPNs are suitable nanocarriers for lung administration29,37,38,39.
In this work, SCPNs were used to carry tobramycin via electrostatic interactions, which neutralized the positive charges of the antibiotic, and they were formulated with DNase I to disaggregate mature P. aeruginosa biofilms. First, the maximum loading of the antibiotic and characterization of the nanoformulated nanoantibiotic were investigated to reach overall charge neutrality at the maximum nanoantibiotic loading capacity. The antimicrobial activities of the final candidates were studied in vitro in the presence of P. aeruginosa, and further, diffusion of the nanoantibiotics into the biofilm was investigated. Finally, the interactions of SCPNs, with or without tobramycin and/or DNase I, with a mature Pseudomonas biofilm matrix grown under continuous conditions mimicking those of chronic infections were studied through time-lapse imaging by laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Results and discussion
SCPN characterization and activity against planktonic bacteria
Dextran-based SCPNs (intermediate I, Supplementary Fig. 1) were prepared by controlled collapse of a single branched polymer coil into nanoparticles through intrachain cross-linking, as previously described37. Intermediate I was then labeled with rhodamine (Rh) via an esterification reaction. The progress of the reaction was followed by TLC, and the unreacted rhodamine was removed using a PD-10 Sephadex column. 1H NMR analyses of rhodamine-labeled SCPN, Intermediate II, showed the absence of ester hydrolysis and confirmed the presence of the Rh dye (Supplementary Fig. 2); UV–Vis spectroscopy was used to establish a concentration of 18 µg Rh/mg (Supplementary Fig. 3). Finally, the remaining methacrylate groups were functionalized with mercaptopropionic acid via thio-Michael addition to provide SCPNs containing anionic carboxylates at neutral pH. The hydrodynamic diameter of the functionalized SCPN was 19 (±1) nm, as judged by DLS (dynamic light scattering) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). It is worth mentioning that a relatively high polydispersity index was obtained (0.26) due to polydispersity of the commercially available dextran polymer chains (see Supplementary Information). A nanoantibiotic SCPN with tobramycin (Tob-SCPN) was prepared by mixing an aqueous dispersion of SCPN with an aqueous solution of tobramycin, both at pH 7 (Fig. 1a). At this pH, the positively charged tobramycin (pKas of the tobramycin amino groups = 7.4, 7.4, 6.2, 8.6, 7.6)40 was electrostatically attached to the negatively charged SCPN (pKa = 4.9, determined experimentally). The electrostatic interactions between SCPN and tobramycin were monitored by aqueous electrophoresis, and a maximum 40 wt% loading of the antibiotic in Tob-SCPN was achieved until the cationic charges of tobramycin were neutralized by the nanoantibiotic. Increased zeta potential were observed from −21 (±1) mV obtained for SCPN, up to a quasi-neutral charge for Tob-SCPN (−5 ± 2 mV for Tob-SCPN, Table 1 and Fig. 1b), and this confirmed that both charged entities were neutralized via electrostatic interactions without affecting the size of the nanocarrier (Dh = 17 ± 1 nm) (Table 1 and Fig. 1d). Interestingly, it is anticipated that ~15 wt% of the nanoantibiotic can be nebulized due to the high loading of tobramycin in Tob-SCPN and its relatively low viscosity at such concentrations (close to water), and this corresponds to the concentration of Tob currently inhaled in clinical practice41. Finally, DNase I was directly formulated with SCPN and Tob-SCPN at 530 µg/mg and 410 µg/mg, respectively, to avoid any chemical modifications of the enzyme that could affect its activity (Fig. 1a). Aggregates with a Z-average of 102 nm were observed for DNase I-SCPN nanosystems, as judged by DLS (Fig. 1c and Table 1). In fact, the corresponding particle size distribution showed the presence of three different size populations, which might indicate the presence of free DNase I (6 nm particles) as well as SCPN with or without DNase I as single particles (15 nm particles) and some aggregates (100 nm particles). Actually, the slight decrease of the middle population for DNase I-SCPN at 15 nm compared to that for pristine particles (19 nm) could indicate the presence of enzyme bound to the particles via hydrogen bonding. However, it remains possible that all DNase I is free in solution. In addition, it is important to mention that DLS, an intensity-average technique, overestimates particle sizes in the presence of aggregates, as they scatter much more light. Thus, it is expected that the number of those aggregates was considerably lower than the relative distribution observed by DLS. In addition, it is noteworthy that a polydispersity index of 0.52 indicated that DLS was not the most suitable technique, and electron microscopy is indicated in this case, although the number of particles analyzed is much lower (over 100 particles). As shown in Fig. 1e, a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of DNase I-SCPN confirmed that the main particle size population was that for small particles with a number-average diameter (Dn) of 21 (±5) nm. This number-average diameter is larger than the hydrodynamic diameter, which can be explained by flattening of the soft SCPN upon drying. Similar flattening was also observed by TEM after drying of SCPN, Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN, which exhibited Dn values of 21 (±8), 37 (±13), and 37 (±13) nm, respectively.
On the other hand, a smaller particle size for Tob-DNase I-SCPN at 11 (±1) nm was observed by DLS, which could indicate interactions between the nanoparticles and the enzyme. The exact interaction mechanism remains unclear, and in addition to electrostatic interactions between the negative DNase I and some cationic tobramycin available at the surface of the particles (despite the overall negative charge of Tob-SCPN), other types of noncovalent interactions, such as H-bonding between SCPN, tobramycin and DNase I, could also occur (Fig. 1d).
The active concentrations of tobramycin and DNase I in the nanoformulations were further validated in two different experiments. First, the tobramycin activity was measured by comparing it with the same soluble free tobramycin concentration in an 8 h bacterial growth curve. As seen in Fig. 2a, the growth curves for P. aeruginosa planktonic treated with SCPN containing tobramycin showed the same growth pattern as those for treatment with free soluble tobramycin at equivalent concentrations. These results confirmed our capacity to quantify the tobramycin concentration accurately and showed that the antibiotic formulated with SCPN did not lose activity, even in the presence of DNase I. Moreover, the innocuousness of SCPN and DNase I-SCPN against planktonic bacteria was also confirmed, as the growth curve for treatment with these nanoparticles at high concentrations (50 µg/ml, Fig. 2a, gray and blue curves) did not differ from that seen without any treatment (Fig. 2a, black curves).
On the other hand, the activity of DNase I within the nanoformulation was verified by quantifying the DNA degradation activity in an agarose gel by electrophoresis and comparing it with the activity of soluble free DNase I (see Methods). In contrast to the activity of the 100% tobramycin SCPN cargo, the DNase I activity was only 5.6% and 7.3% for the total loaded DNase I in the DNase I-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN, respectively. Actually, it has been reported that enzyme inactivation by nanomaterials can also originate from large changes in protein structure following absorption or covalent binding, as well as from relatively low stability42,43.
Formulation of tobramycin and DNase I with SCPN enhances the activity against continuous P. aeruginosa biofilms
A continuous-flow mature biofilm was used to measure antibiofilm activity, as it is one of the methodologies used to mimic the biofilms formed in chronically infected patients44,45. In this case, continuous biofilms of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were grown for 72 h in flow-cell chambers (see the Methods section) and then treated for 16 h with 0.26 µg/ml free DNase I, 2 µg/ml free tobramycin and a combination of both treatments. Note that the tobramycin MIC value for planktonic cells is 2 µg/ml (Fig. 2a). At the same time, the biofilms were treated with SCPN containing equivalent tobramycin and DNase I concentrations (5 µg Tob-SCPN/mL contained 2 µg/ml tobramycin, and 8.7 µg Tob-DNase I-SCPN/mL contained 2 µg/ml tobramycin and 0.26 µg/ml DNase I). The mature treated biofilms were stained and imaged under a confocal microscope, and different biofilm parameters were calculated (biomass and thickness).
As seen in Fig. 2b, the SCPN carrier had not effect on biofilm biomass (black striped bars), and the most effective treatment for biofilms was observed when Tob-DNase I-SCPNs containing both DNase I and tobramycin were used (purple striped bars); they reduced the volume of the formed biofilm by 34% (biomass) compared to the untreated biofilm (Fig. 2b, purple striped bars vs. black solid bars). Clearly, the nanoformulation with DNase I and/or tobramycin increased the activity of both molecules against the formed biofilm, as it improved the corresponding treatment compared to those of nonencapsulated compounds and showed 5 to 15% reductions of the established biofilm (from 71 to 66% with Tob-DNase I-SCPN, purple bars; from 77 to 71% with Tob-SCPN, green bars; and from 82 to 67% with DNase I-SCPN, blue bars).
It has been extensively reported that the use of enzymes for in vivo biofilm treatments without antibiotics leads to biofilm expansion and sepsis46,47,48. For the continuous biofilm shown in Fig. 2b, the constant media flow eliminated detached bacteria, which prevented biofilm regrowth. Therefore, even though reduction of the biofilm carried out by the SCPN containing DNase I (blue stripped bars) was almost the same as that of the SCPN containing both tobramycin and DNase I (purple stripped bars), it is crucial to add an antibiotic to increase treatment efficacy.
In addition to the reduction percentage for biomass in Pseudomonas biofilms treated with Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN, notable increases in dead bacteria content (stained in red) were seen in the confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) images with a reddish nuance (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 1), which demonstrated the capacity of tobramycin to kill bacteria.
More importantly, it is worth emphasizing that, in addition to being continuous, biofilm formation over 72 h allowed the bacteria to grow in different layers, which caused the whole study to mimic in vivo conditions and made biofilm treatment more challenging. Most of the promising results published with nanoantibiotics were obtained with static biofilms49,50,51,52,53,54,55 or continuous biofilms grown for <24 h56. The biofilms resulting in these previous studies implied fewer bacteria in the biofilm state, often in monolayer, and corresponded to a weaker biofilm. Thus, less treatment was required to achieve full eradication compared to the mature biofilms found in infected patients, which indicated a structured and complex extracellular biofilm matrix. Additionally, it is noteworthy that the current study was performed with a single dose treatment, and further continuous treatment within our experimental setup would be required to considerably diminish the strong biofilm developed.
SCPN formulated with DNase I enhances tobramycin penetrability into the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix
Permeability studies of the different SCPNs in a P. aeruginosa mature biofilm were performed using a Franz diffusion cell (see scheme in Fig. 3a). This methodology allowed us to analyze nanoparticle and antibiotic permeability into a 72 h-old P. aeruginosa biofilm by quantifying the amounts of SCPNs and tobramycin that had diffused throughout the biofilm after 4 h. Soluble tobramycin recovery was 0% in all tested samples (Fig. 3b, red line). On the other hand, it was found that some of the labeled SCPNs were recovered after 4 h in all the nanoformulations tested. SCPN recovery efficiencies were 0.6, 1 and 2% for SCPN, Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN, respectively (Fig. 3b, black, green and purple lines, respectively). The recovery of the SCPNs alone without the tobramycin indicates that the antibiotic was released from the SCPNs.
This experiment demonstrated that SCPNs diffused through the biofilm at a very low diffusion rate, while tobramycin was retained in the biofilm extracellular matrix. Nonetheless, considering the improvement in biofilm eradication that SCPNs conferred on tobramycin (Fig. 2b), it is suggested that SCPNs improved tobramycin entrance into deeper locations in the biofilm, which allowed more efficient killing of the embedded bacterial cells. This is in good agreement with the results of Thorn et al.57 who observed tobramycin immobilized in the upper portion of the biofilm over time. Moreover, they also showed that their nanoparticle formulation did not diffuse through the full thickness of the biofilm but enhanced tobramycin penetration.
SCPN interacts with the biofilm extracellular matrix
The previous experiments (Figs. 2, 3) determined SCPN efficacy by analyzing biofilm biomass changes after 16 h of treatment and penetrability of the SCPNs and tobramycin into the biofilm, but none of them described the dynamics for modifications at the biofilm extracellular matrix level. Additionally, these studies did not show the progression of the treatment or the interactions of the nanoparticles with the biofilm. To further investigate this behavior, different SCPN interactions with an established P. aeruginosa PAO1 72 h-old continuous biofilm were monitored by imaging with time-lapse confocal microscopy. During the 16 h experiment, bacterial cells, eDNA, and the polysaccharides present in the biofilm extracellular matrix, were differentially stained and tracked. Three different nanoparticles (SCPN, Tob-SCPN, and Tob-Dnase I-SCPN) were labeled with rhodamine dye and inoculated inside the biofilm flow-cell chamber, all with the same nanoformulation concentration (100 µg of nanoformulation/ml). At this concentration, which was ten times higher than the one used in Fig. 2b, some aggregates with sizes of ~1–2 µm were observed after direct interaction with the biofilm structure. It is also noteworthy that most of the aggregates observed after contact with the biofilm tended to disappear over time, which indicated redispersion of the nanoparticles in the matrix. However, due to the limit of detection of the confocal microscopy technique, which can only detect particles with diameters >200 nm, the presence of those aggregates allowed tracking of the nanoantibiotic via confocal microscope imaging and enabled monitoring of their behavior over the 16 h of the time-lapse experiment. In this case, tracking these large nanoantibiotic aggregates represented the worst-case scenario; better penetration of nonaggregated nanoantibiotics into the bacterial biofilm could be anticipated.
Labeled SCPN-based nanoformulations and different dyes for staining bacterial cells, eDNA, and the extracellular matrix polysaccharides were simultaneously injected into a mature biofilm (see Methods). Then, different regions with ~1–2 µm SCPN aggregates were actively selected for tracking and imaging with the confocal microscope. The areas of interest were imaged for 16 h with the programmable acquisition algorithm of the Zen software with multiposition time series (Zeiss). Focus was maintained during imaging, and artifacts caused by thermal drift or vibrations were avoided by using Definite Focus equipment (Zeiss) coupled to the confocal microscope.
After 16 h of treatment, a 13 × 13 µm region of interest surrounding the nanoparticle aggregate was created to analyze the behavior in the biofilm components with time (see Methods). In that sense, Fig. 4 depicts the changes in matrix, cells and eDNA biomass in the area surrounding the nanoparticle aggregate. First, the innocuousness of the SCPNs was again demonstrated; bacteria grew exponentially and became stationary at 6–9 h when bacteria covered 100% of the region and could no longer spread (black line of Fig. 4a). Similarly, Fig. 4b shows the increase achieved during the time-lapse 16 h experiment by the extracellular matrix biomass in the control biofilm (treated with SCPN alone, black line). It is perhaps worth emphasizing that when a continuous biofilm was formed, the constant media flow through the chamber expelled the nonattached bacteria (Fig. 2b)58. However, during time-lapse imaging, the flow was stopped, and nonattached bacteria were allowed to grow planktonically in addition to the attached bacteria that continued to form the biofilm.
With all data recovered from the microscopic images of the time-lapse experiment, a 3D representation of the biofilm and a graphical representation for distribution of matrix biomass (extracellular matrix polysaccharides staining), cell biomass, eDNA, and nanoparticle aggregates in the biofilm were also performed (Fig. 5). To normalize the biofilms, all plots start at the x-axis in the upper part of the biofilm, when the area covered by cells and the extracellular matrix decreases. On the other hand, the area covered by nanoparticles was normalized by assigning 100% at the position where the most significant portion of SCPN aggregates were imaged. In the case of pristine SCPN (Fig. 5b), the bacterial cells grew in biofilm as well as planktonically, and the percentage of area occupied by bacterial cells (dark blue line) increased over time and included the whole area after 9 h. The 3D representation below the graphs depicts this planktonic growth with an increase in dark blue at the top of the biofilm (increase in bacterial cells). In the same figure, the progression of biofilm formation was also observed, as the area under the light blue curve was constantly growing during the experiment.
DNase I prevents regrowth of the P. aeruginosa biofilm during 16 h of treatment
In the biofilm treated with SCPNs containing tobramycin alone or in combination with DNase I the biofilm cells and the extracellular matrix were sensitive and suffered apparent modifications. In both cases (Fig. 5c, d), biofilm matrix formation was impaired in the first hours, as the area under the light blue curve was lower than that for the control SCPN (Fig. 5b). Figure 4 also shows that biofilm treated with Tob-SCPN first decreased its total biomass, as shown by the green lines in Fig. 4a, b. However, increases in cell numbers and the extracellular matrix were observed after 6 and 12 h, respectively. Thus, enough tobramycin was available to fight bacteria at the start of the experiment (<6 h), but the concentration was not enough for the long term, and the living biofilm cells started to grow and build up the biofilm and the extracellular matrix again. These results might indicate that repeated doses (every 6–8 h) of Tob-SCPN will be required for efficient biofilm removal and treatment.
On the other hand, the biofilm treated with SCPNs containing both tobramycin and DNase I (Tob-DNase I-SCPN) underwent a progressive decrease in the extracellular matrix and a slight increase in the number of free bacterial cells (Fig. 4a, b, purple line). The tobramycin released from these SCPNs seems effective for the first 3 h of treatment, as the cell biomass started to decrease (Fig. 4a, purple line). Afterward, a significant increase in the bacterial cells was observed due to the delayed effect of DNase I, which started to disperse the biofilm by breaking down the internal eDNA network and releasing the bacterial cells. We observed that the tobramycin formulated with the nanoparticles actively killed free cells, as the slope of the purple line was much less pronounced than that corresponding to SCPN alone (Fig. 4a, black line). However, additional Tob-SCPN doses or higher concentrations of Tob-SCPN should be administered to avoid the spread of the biofilm46.
To observe equivalent SCPN aggregate sizes, similar amounts of the different SCPNs were administered to the biofilm for time-lapse imaging. However, it is important to point out that at the same nanoformulation weight, Tob-SCPN had a higher antibiotic concentration than Tob-DNase I-SCPN (Table 1). This higher tobramycin concentration indicated why biomass loss was faster with Tob-SCPN than with Tob-DNase I-SCPN (Fig. 4b, green line vs. purple line). Nevertheless, even with the higher concentration of tobramycin, regrowth of the biofilm was clearly observed after 12 h for the biofilm treated with Tob-SCPN. On the other hand, the biofilm treated with Tob-DNase I-SCPN continued to decrease over time until 16 h. Treatments with enzymes that degrade and breakdown the biofilm matrix, together with antibiotics that actively destroy or inhibit bacterial cells liberated from the biofilm, have been extensively studied, not only with deoxyribonucleases but also with proteases and glycoside hydrolases59. In summary, this combined treatment caused a reduction in the antibiotic dose necessary to treat the biofilm.
Tob-DNase I SCPN enhances eDNA dispersion and interaction and penetrability into the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix
As previously mentioned, SCPNs with sizes of ~20 nm are too small to be monitored with a confocal microscope (due to technical limitations), so the time-lapse experiment was carried out with SCPN aggregates with diameters of 1–2 µm. It must be pointed out that such aggregates are not representative of the individual behavior of SCPNs, but they allowed us to study their approach and interaction with the extracellular matrix. The Fig. 4d and the gray numbers in Fig. 5, illustrate the positions of nanoparticle aggregates in the matrix over time. In all cases, the nanoparticle aggregates were close to the biofilm surface, but in Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN (green and purple lines of Fig. 4d and gray numbers in Fig. 5c, d), the nanoparticle aggregates moved 1 µm deeper inside the biofilm than SCPN alone. These nanoparticles, without any tobramycin or DNase I, were negatively charged (Table 1). Thus, electrostatic repulsions with the highly negatively charged extracellular matrix could be anticipated (black line in Fig. 4d, and gray numbers in Fig. 5b). These results are consistent with the penetration studies shown in Fig. 3, where penetration increased in the order SCPN < Tob-SCPN < Tob-DNase I-SCPN.
On the other hand, tobramycin exhibited considerably reduced biofilm diffusion because it is a positively charged antibiotic sequestered in the biofilm periphery by ionic interactions60. In some treatments, tobramycin is administered via an aerosol, as this mitigates toxicity, increases the final concentration at the infection site, and compensates for low diffusion into the biofilm61. However, this is not sufficient, and tobramycin and other antibiotics require enhanced biofilm diffusion and penetration to increase antimicrobial efficacy, especially in patients with CF and broadly chronic infections. Neutralization of the charges in tobramycin when formulated with negatively charged SCPNs, together with the DNase I released, could boost penetration inside the biofilms. Some authors have concluded that nanoparticle size is the key factor determining diffusion into the matrix28. Penetration of nanoparticles with sizes up to 70 nm has been observed, but the perfect size has been reported to be between 10 and 30 nm62. Since our SCPNs, formulated or not, have average sizes of ~20 nm (Table 1), they appear to be ideal candidates for penetration and diffusion inside the matrix.
Finally, the concentrations of eDNA surrounding the nanoparticle aggregates were also calculated over time. Clearly, eDNA was completely removed in <3 h for the biofilm treated with Tob-DNase I-SCPN (Fig. 4c, purple line), which demonstrated the efficacy of the enzyme. Interestingly, the biofilm treated with Tob-SCPN exhibited a constant decrease in eDNA levels, which was attributed to matrix disaggregation and release caused by tobramycin (Fig. 4c, green line). In contrast, the eDNA level gradually increased over time for the biofilm treated with SCPN (Fig. 4c, black line), which had already shown continuous growth and building of the extracellular matrix (Fig. 4b, black line). These results combined with the results obtained in Fig. 5, where Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN showed deeper penetration, clearly demonstrated that biofilm matrix disaggregation improved the penetrability of the nanoparticles and enhanced antibiotic diffusion inside the biofilm, which will allow better treatment for chronic infections forming a biofilm, such as CF or COPD.
Many nanobased formulations have been developed to deliver antibiotics for chronic pulmonary infections and include inorganic nanoparticles, liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and hybrid systems, but most of these nanosystems have a low antibiotic encapsulation efficiency and were only tested in static biofilms, which do not resemble real infections in vivo. In this work, we loaded up to 40 wt% tobramycin in SCPNs based on natural dextran polysaccharides and functionalized them with the enzyme DNase I. These nanoformulations were tested against mature continuous-flow biofilms of P. aeruginosa and showed improved efficacy compared to treatment with free and soluble tobramycin and DNase I. Specifically, the use of SCPNs increased the biofilm reduction by 15% compared to the soluble treatment with the DNase I-SCPN. Moreover, with the Tob-DNase I-SCPN biofilm treatment, the biofilm biomass reduction achieved was 34 % using a very low quantity of antibiotic (2 µg/ml of tobramycin). Besides, we studied the detailed effects and interactions of the nanoformulations with the extracellular matrix components of P. aeruginosa biofilms with specific labeling of the different components and time-lapse imaging by laser scanning confocal microscopy. We demonstrated that the SCPNs neutralized the charges of tobramycin and, together with a DNase I formulation, boosted nanoantibiotic efficacy, penetrability and diffusion through the biofilm and avoided retention of the antibiotic at the biofilm periphery.
3-Mercaptopropionic acid (≥99%), 4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride (DMTMM·HCl) (96%) and rhodamine B (97%) were purchased from Aldrich. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was purchased from Scharlau. 4-(Dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) and tobramycin (97%) were purchased from Acros-Organics. DNase I was purchased from Panreac, Applichem. The water (H2O) used in the syntheses was deionized water from a Milli-Q A10 Gradient system (Millipore).
SCPN: dextran-based single-chain polymer nanoparticles labeled with rhodamine and functionalized with 3-mercaptopropionic acid
DXT-SCPN (100 mg, 484 µmol glucose) was dispersed into pH 7.4 PBS at 10 mg/mL for 1 h. Then, a mixture of DMTMM·HCl (4.6 mg, 16.7 μmol) and rhodamine B (5.3 mg, 11 μmol) were added to PBS, and the reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC in methanol to ensure correct functionalization of the particles by rhodamine. The methacrylate groups of the particles were functionalized by reaction with 3-mercaptopropionic acid (117 mg, 1.11 mmol) at pH 9 for 5 h. The crude material was purified by dialysis (3.5 kDa MWCO RC membranes) against water. Water was refreshed twice a day until the water conductivity reached a value below 1 μS/cm. The final product was freeze-dried and kept at 4 °C until further analysis. Yield: 93%. The glucose substitution degree DS = 45%. The cross-linking degree CL = 5%. Mw = 59 kDa. The Rhodamine B content was 18 μg/mg nanocarrier. Dh (DLS) = 19 ± 1 nm; PdI = 0.26 ± 0.04; zeta potential (pH = 7, 25 °C) = −21 ± 1 mV; Dn (TEM, uranyl staining) = 21 ± 8 nm.
1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ ppm: 8.55–6.74 (m, 0.3 H, rhodamine Har), 5.54–4.86 (2.6 H, including H-1 and H-2/3 substituted Glc), 4.25–3.33 (11.6 H, m, rest of Glc and CH2 Rh), 1.28 (s, 3H, CH3 Gluc, and CH3 Rh) (Supplementary Fig. 4).
SCPN (10 mg, 0.2 μmol) and DNase I (11.3 mg, 0.4 μmol) were dispersed into water at 10 mg/mL at pH 7 and mixed for 1 h at room temperature. The sample was freeze-dried before further analysis. Dh (DLS) = 102 ± 2 nm; PdI = 0.52 ± 0.01; zeta potential (pH = 7, 25 °C) = −28 ± 1 mV; Dn (TEM, uranyl staining) = 20 ± 5 nm.
SCPN (6 mg, 0.1 μmol) and tobramycin (4 mg, 8.6 μmol) were dispersed and dissolved into water at 10 mg/mL separately, and the pH was adjusted to 7. Then, both were mixed and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The sample was freeze-dried and kept at 4 °C until further analysis. Dh (DLS) = 17 ± 1 nm; PdI = 0.27 ± 0.01; zeta potential (pH = 7, 25 °C) = −5 ± 2 mV; Dn (TEM, uranyl staining) = 37 ± 13 nm.
Tob-SCPN (12.4 mg) and DNase I (11.2 mg) were dispersed into 1 mM NaCl at 10 mg/ml at pH 7 and gently mixed for 1 h at RT. Dh (DLS) = 11 ± 1 nm; PdI = 0.27 ± 0.07; zeta potential (pH = 7, 25 °C) = −6 ± 1 mV; Dn (TEM, uranyl staining) = 37 ± 13 nm.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
DLS analyses were conducted using a Zetasizer Nano ZS, ZEN3600 Model (Malvern Instruments Ltd). All measurements were performed in disposable sizing cuvettes at a laser wavelength of 633 nm and a scattering angle of 173°, while the zeta-potential measurements were performed in disposable zeta-potential cells (pH 7.4, 25 °C). Before the measurements, samples were dispersed at concentrations of 10 mg/mL in PBS solution for size measurements and 1 mM NaCl for zeta-potential measurements. Each sample measurement was repeated three times at 25 °C.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR)
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III spectrometer at 500 MHz and 25 °C. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to the residual signal of the solvent. Splitting patterns: b, broad; s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet.
UV–vis measurements used to determine rhodamine loading were carried out at 1 mg/mL in PBS using a UV-2401PC UV–vis recording spectrophotometer from Shimadzu. The rhodamine B content was calculated using a calibration curve for rhodamine B in PBS.
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)
LC–MS data were recorded using a UPLC Acquity instrument equipped with an Acquity C18 100*2.1 mm*1.7 μm column coupled to an LCT Premier XT ESI-TOF mass spectrometer (source: electrospray positive mode with a mode m/z range 50-1000, capillary vol: 1000/cone volt: 50) and analyzed using Masslynx 4.1 software from Waters. The mobile phases used were A: 0.1% HFBA in water and B: 0.1% HFBA in acetonitrile. Tobramycin elution was carried out isocratically with 95% A for 2 min and a gradient from 95 to 1% An over 15 min. Tobramycin was detected after 6.7 min elution (m/z = 468).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
TEM analyses were performed in a TECNAI G2 20 TWIN microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 KeV in bright-field image mode. One drop of the sample dispersion in water (~3 μL, 0.1 mg/mL) was deposited on a carbon film supported on a copper grid (300 mesh) and hydrophilized by a glow discharge process just before use. After staining for 20 s with a uranyl acetate aqueous solution (1% w/v), the sample was dried at room temperature overnight. The number-average diameter was calculated by ImageJ platform analysis using Gaussian curve fitting after counting at least 100 nanoparticles.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 CECT 4122 (ATCC 15692) was obtained from the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT) and cultivated at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani broth medium (LB) (Scharlab). Bacterial growth was measured by measuring the optical density (O.D.) at 550 nm.
Antibacterial activity against planktonic bacteria
P. aeruginosa PAO1 was grown planktonically to the initial exponential log phase (O.D.550 nm ≈ 0.1) and plated in a microtiter plate (Corning 3596 Polystyrene Flat Bottom 96 Well) supplemented with different SCPN and antibiotic concentrations following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines63. As previously described45, the microtiter plate was incubated at 37 °C in a SPARK Multimode microplate reader (Tecan) with 150 rpm shaking. Bacterial growth was monitored for 8 h by reading the OD550 nm every 15 min.
DNase I activity testing
DNase I-SCPN and a known DNase I (Panreac Applichem, ref A3778) concentration were incubated with 100 ng of P. aeruginosa genomic DNA for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were then loaded into a 0.8% agarose gel plus ethidium bromide (0.25 µg/mL) and visualized under U.V. light in a Gel DocTM XR+ (Bio–Rad Laboratories). DNase I activity was estimated with DNA degradation quantification performed with Quantity One software (Bio–Rad Laboratories).
Antibacterial activity against continuous-flow biofilms
Continuous P. aeruginosa biofilms were grown using a flow-cell system, as previously reported45,64. Biofilms were grown with LB medium plus 0.2% glucose to stimulate biofilm formation, and the flow cells were inoculated with 350 µl of P. aeruginosa PAO1 at an OD550 nm ≈ 0.1. After allowing the bacteria to attach for 2 h, media was pumped through the system at 42 µL/min employing an Ismatec ISM 943 peristaltic pump (Ismatec). Bubble traps (DTU Systems Biology) were placed in the system to avoid biofilm disturbances. Biofilms were grown for 3 days (72 h) at room temperature, and then the treatment (0.26 µg/mL DNase I, 2 µg/mL tobramycin or the equivalent nanoformulation concentration (5 µg Tob-SCPN/mL and 8.7 µg Tob-DNase I-SCPN/mL)) was injected into the mature biofilms. After 16 h of treatment, biofilms were stained with SYTO9 and propidium iodide (Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions and visualized using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) with a 20×/0.8 air objective. Biomass and thickness quantification of the images obtained was performed using FIJI and COMSTAT2 software65.
Franz cell diffusion assay
The diffusion assay was carried out by using 5 mL Franz cells (PermeGear). The receptor and donor chambers were divided by means of a polyethersulfone (PES) hydrophilic membrane with a pore size of 0.22 µm and a 13 mm diameter (Millipore Express® PLUS Membrane Filters, Merck) that was applied between the two compartments. Before applying the membrane between the cell compartments, the P. aeruginosa biofilm was grown at 37 °C for 72 h on the membranes. The receptor chamber was filled with 5 mL PBS. A suspension of the controls and formulations to be tested (Tob, SCPN, Tob-SCPN and Tob-DNase I-SCPN) were uniformly added to the top of the biofilm. The cell system was incubated at room temperature under continuous stirring, and samples (1 mL) were removed at defined times (1, 2, and 4 h). The tested SCPNs were labeled with rhodamine as previously described. Samples were analyzed for tobramycin content by LC–MS and SCPN content by fluorescence analysis using a Synergy HT microplate reader (Biotek Instruments). The results are reported as the percentage of SCPNs that diffused through the whole biofilm layer and were quantified in the receptor chamber of the Franz Cell.
Continuous P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms were grown in flow-cell chambers as previously explained. To obtain time-lapse images, 100 µg/mL nanoparticles were injected into mature-grown P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms (72 h old) with specific biofilm staining: DAPI at 300 nM (Life Technologies) for intracellular DNA (biomass), TOTO™-1 iodide at 1 µM (Thermo Fisher) to stain eDNA, and concanavalin A AlexaFluor™ 647 conjugate at 100 µg/mL (Life Technologies) to dye the exopolysaccharides of the biofilm extracellular matrix. Microscopic images were taken approximately every 3 h with a 63×/1.4 oil objective mounted in a Zeiss LSM 800 CLSM using the multiposition Time Series module of ZEN software and the Definite Focus.2 system implemented in our confocal microscope (Zeiss). Analysis of matrix, cells, eDNA, and nanoparticle variation was made by creating a specific ROI (region of interest) of 13 × 13 µm around the nanoparticle and quantifying the biomass and area occupied by layers using FIJI and COMSTAT2 software. 3D representation was created using IMARIS software (Bitplane AG).
The authors declare that all relevant data supporting the findings of the study are available within the article and the Supplementary Information file. Additional details can be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Wolfmeier, H., Pletzer, D., Mansour, S. C. & Hancock, R. E. W. New perspectives in biofilm eradication. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 93–106 (2018).
Flemming, H. C. & Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 8, 623–633 (2010).
Ciofu, O., Hansen, C. R. & Høiby, N. Respiratory bacterial infections in cystic fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 19, 251–258 (2013).
Fazli, M. et al. Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J. Clin. Microbiol 47, 4084–4089 (2009).
Stapleton, F. & Carnt, N. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Eye 26, 185–193 (2012).
Cendra, M. D. M. & Torrents, E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and their partners in crime. Biotechnol. Adv. 49, 107734 (2021).
Shi, Q., Huang, C., Xiao, T., Wu, Z. & Xiao, Y. A retrospective analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in carbapenem-susceptible and -non-susceptible infections. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8, 68 (2019).
Gil-Perotin, S. et al. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator-associated pneumonia response: a state of concept. Crit. Care 16, R93 (2012).
Cole, S. J., Records, A. R., Orr, M. W., Linden, S. B. & Lee, V. T. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by exopolysaccharide-independent biofilms. Infect. Immun. 82, 2048–2058 (2014).
Cendra, M. D. M., Blanco-Cabra, N., Pedraz, L. & Torrents, E. Optimal environmental and culture conditions allow the in vitro coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in stable biofilms. Sci. Rep. 9, 16284 (2019).
Okshevsky, M. & Meyer, R. L. The role of extracellular DNA in the establishment, maintenance and perpetuation of bacterial biofilms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 341–352 (2015).
Boles, B. R. & Horswill, A. R. Staphylococcal biofilm disassembly. Trends Microbiol. 19, 449–455 (2011).
Das, T., Sharma, P. K., Busscher, H. J., van der Mei, H. C. & Krom, B. P. Role of extracellular DNA in initial bacterial adhesion and surface aggregation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 3405–3408 (2010).
Das, T. et al. Phenazine virulence factor binding to extracellular DNA is important for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Sci. Rep. 5, 8398 (2015).
Whitchurch, C. B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Ragas, P. C. & Mattick, J. S. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487 (2002).
Shire, S. J. in Formulation, Characterization, and Stability of Protein Drugs: Case Histories: Case Histories (eds Rodney Pearlman & Y. John Wang) 393–426 (Springer, 2002).
Folkesson, A. et al. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: an evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 841–851 (2012).
Gordon, V., Bakhtiari, L. & Kovach, K. From molecules to multispecies ecosystems: the roles of structure in bacterial biofilms. Phys. Biol. 16, 041001 (2019).
Chiang, W. C. et al. Extracellular DNA shields against aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 2352–2361 (2013).
Lewenza, S. Extracellular DNA-induced antimicrobial peptide resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 4, 21 (2013).
Chen, E. Y., Wang, Y. C., Chen, C. S. & Chin, W. C. Functionalized positive nanoparticles reduce mucin swelling and dispersion. PLoS ONE 5, e15434 (2010).
Forier, K. et al. Transport of nanoparticles in cystic fibrosis sputum and bacterial biofilms by single-particle tracking microscopy. Nanomedicine 8, 935–949 (2013).
Dawson, M., Wirtz, D. & Hanes, J. Enhanced viscoelasticity of human cystic fibrotic sputum correlates with increasing microheterogeneity in particle transport. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50393–50401 (2003).
Sanders, N. N. et al. Cystic fibrosis sputum: a barrier to the transport of nanospheres. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162, 1905–1911 (2000).
Meers, P. et al. Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61, 859–868 (2008).
Messiaen, A. S., Forier, K., Nelis, H., Braeckmans, K. & Coenye, T. Transport of nanoparticles and tobramycin-loaded liposomes in Burkholderia cepacia complex biofilms. PLoS ONE 8, e79220 (2013).
Baelo, A. et al. Disassembling bacterial extracellular matrix with DNase-coated nanoparticles to enhance antibiotic delivery in biofilm infections. J. Control Release 209, 150–158 (2015).
Wan, F. et al. Ultrasmall TPGS-PLGA hybrid nanoparticles for site-specific delivery of antibiotics into Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms in Lungs. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 12, 380–389 (2020).
Falciani, C. et al. Antimicrobial peptide-loaded nanoparticles as inhalation therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Int J. Nanomed. 15, 1117–1128 (2020).
Pomposo, J. A. Single‐Chain Polymer Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Simulations, and Applications. (Wiley, Weinheim - Germany, 2017).
Kroger, A. P. P. & Paulusse, J. M. J. Single-chain polymer nanoparticles in controlled drug delivery and targeted imaging. J. Control Release 286, 326–347 (2018).
Mavila, S., Eivgi, O., Berkovich, I. & Lemcoff, N. G. Intramolecular cross-linking methodologies for the synthesis of polymer nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 116, 878–961 (2016).
Hanlon, A. M., Lyon, C. K. & Berda, E. B. What is next in single-chain nanoparticles. Macromolecules 49, 2–14 (2016).
Pomposo, J. A. Bioinspired single-chain polymer nanoparticles. 63, 589–592, https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4671 (2014).
Benito, A. B. et al. Functional single-chain polymer nanoparticles: targeting and imaging pancreatic tumors in vivo. Biomacromolecules 17, 3213–3221 (2016).
Gracia, R. et al. Biocompatible single-chain polymer nanoparticles loaded with an antigen mimetic as potential anticancer vaccine. ACS Macro Lett. 7, 196–200 (2018).
Gracia, R. et al. Synthesis and functionalization of dextran-based single-chain nanoparticles in aqueous media. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 1143–1147 (2017).
van der Weide, H. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of novel antimicrobial peptide AA139-nanomedicines in a multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia-septicemia model in rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00517-20 (2020).
Ritter, D. et al. In vitro inhalation cytotoxicity testing of therapeutic nanosystems for pulmonary infection. Toxicol. Vitr. 63, 104714 (2020).
Walter, F., Vicens, Q. & Westhof, E. Aminoglycoside-RNA interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 3, 694–704 (1999).
Geller, D. E., Pitlick, W. H., Nardella, P. A., Tracewell, W. G. & Ramsey, B. W. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of aerosolized tobramycin in cystic fibrosis. Chest 122, 219–226 (2002).
Lira, A. L. et al. Allosteric inhibition of alpha-thrombin enzymatic activity with ultrasmall gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 1, 378–388 (2019).
Sizochenko, N., Leszczynska, D. & Leszczynski, J. Modeling of interactions between the Zebrafish hatching enzyme ZHE1 and a series of metal oxide nanoparticles: Nano-QSAR and causal analysis of inactivation mechanisms. Nanomaterials 7, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100330 (2017).
Blanco-Cabra, N. et al. A new BiofilmChip device for testing biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 62 (2021).
Blanco-Cabra, N. et al. Novel oleanolic and maslinic acid derivatives as a promising treatment against bacterial biofilm in nosocomial infections: an in vitro and in vivo study. ACS Infect. Dis. 5, 1581–1589 (2019).
Fleming, D. & Rumbaugh, K. The consequences of biofilm dispersal on the host. Sci. Rep. 8, 10738 (2018).
Chua, S. L. et al. Dispersed cells represent a distinct stage in the transition from bacterial biofilm to planktonic lifestyles. Nat. Commun. 5, 4462 (2014).
Redman, W. K. et al. Efficacy and safety of biofilm dispersal by glycoside hydrolases in wounds. Biofilm 3, 100061 (2021).
d’Angelo, I. et al. Overcoming barriers in Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections: engineered nanoparticles for local delivery of a cationic antimicrobial peptide. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 135, 717–725 (2015).
Pompilio, A. et al. Electrochemically synthesized silver nanoparticles are active against planktonic and biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other cystic fibrosis-associated bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1349 (2018).
Patel, K. K. et al. Alginate lyase immobilized chitosan nanoparticles of ciprofloxacin for the improved antimicrobial activity against the biofilm associated mucoid P. aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Int J. Pharm. 563, 30–42 (2019).
Al-Obaidi, H., Kalgudi, R. & Zariwala, M. G. Fabrication of inhaled hybrid silver/ciprofloxacin nanoparticles with synergetic effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 128, 27–35 (2018).
Al-Nemrawi, N. K., Alshraiedeh, N. H., Zayed, A. L. & Altaani, B. M. Low molecular weight chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles for pulmonary delivery of tobramycin for cystic fibrosis. Pharmaceuticals 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph11010028 (2018).
Gao, Y. et al. Size and charge adaptive clustered nanoparticles targeting the biofilm microenvironment for chronic lung infection management. ACS Nano 14, 5686–5699 (2020).
Ho, D. K. et al. Squalenyl hydrogen sulfate nanoparticles for simultaneous delivery of tobramycin and an alkylquinolone quorum sensing inhibitor enable the eradication of P. aeruginosa biofilm infections. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 59, 10292–10296 (2020).
Ernst, J. et al. Polyester-based particles to overcome the obstacles of mucus and biofilms in the lung for tobramycin application under static and dynamic fluidic conditions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 131, 120–129 (2018).
Thorn, C. R. et al. Tobramycin liquid crystal nanoparticles eradicate cystic fibrosis-related Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Small, e2100531, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202100531 (2021).
Macia, M. D., Rojo-Molinero, E. & Oliver, A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 981–990 (2014).
Fleming, D. & Rumbaugh, K. P. Approaches to dispersing medical biofilms. Microorganisms 5, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020015 (2017).
Tseng, B. S. et al. The extracellular matrix protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 2865–2878 (2013).
Deacon, J. et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of tobramycin polymeric nanoparticles for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis: formulation, characterisation and functionalisation with dornase alfa (DNase). J. Control Release 198, 55–61 (2015).
Miller, K. P., Wang, L., Benicewicz, B. C. & Decho, A. W. Inorganic nanoparticles engineered to attack bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 7787–7807 (2015).
CLSI. in CLSI standard M07 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2018).
Blanco-Cabra, N. et al. Characterization of different alginate lyases for dissolving Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Sci. Rep. 10, 9390 (2020).
Heydorn, A. et al. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program comstat. Microbiology 146, 2395–2407 (2000).
This study was partially supported by grants to ET from the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, MINECO, and Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), Spain, co-funded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER, European Union (RTI2018-098573-B-100), the CERCA program and AGAUR-Generalitat de Catalunya (2017SGR-1079), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), Catalan Cystic Fibrosis association and Obra Social “La Caixa”. CIDETEC kindly acknowledges the Basque Government for funding this work (ELKARTEK/BMG19 ref. KK-2019/00015, ELKARTEK/BMG20 ref. KK-2020/00010). M.M. acknowledges MIUR-Italy (“Progetto Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022”) funding allocated to the Department of Chemistry (“Ugo Schiff”).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Blanco-Cabra, N., Movellan, J., Marradi, M. et al. Neutralization of ionic interactions by dextran-based single-chain nanoparticles improves tobramycin diffusion into a mature biofilm. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 52 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-022-00317-9