The perplexity of the complex multispecies community interactions is one of the many reasons why majority of the microorganisms are still uncultivated. We analyzed the entire co-occurrence networks between the OTUs of Tibet and Yunnan hot spring samples, and found that less abundant OTUs such as genus Tepidimonas (relative abundant <1%) had high-degree centricity (key nodes), while dominant OTUs particularly genus Chloroflexus (relative abundant, 13.9%) formed the peripheral vertexes. A preliminary growth-promotion assay determined that Tepidimonas sp. strain SYSU G00190W enhanced the growth of Chloroflexus sp. SYSU G00190R. Exploiting this result, an ameliorated isolation medium containing 10% spent-culture supernatant of Tepidimonas sp. strain SYSU G00190W was prepared for targeted isolation of Chloroflexi in the Tibet and Yunnan hot spring samples. 16S rRNA gene fingerprinting characterized majority of the colonies isolated from these media as previously uncultivated Chloroflexi, of which 36 are potential novel species (16S rRNA sequence identity <98.5%). Metabolomes studies indicated that the spent-culture supernatant comprises several low-molecular-weight organic substrates that can be utilized as potential nutrients for the growth of these bacteria. These findings suggested that limited knowledge on the interaction of microbes provide threshold to traditional isolation method.
Earth is by large a microbial world. About 106 prokaryotic species were estimated to exist on Earth1, of which ~12,000 (~1% of the total) species have so far been cultivated and validly described2. The remaining ~99% either fail to grow on the synthetic growth media used in the laboratory or require special or unidentified culture techniques3. We do, however, understand that these uncultured microbes play unprecedented roles in carbon and nitrogen cycling, novel natural products chemistry, and in maintaining the balance of the environment.
Factors influencing the cultivability of these uncultivated microorganisms have been extensively studied. The inclusion of next-generation sequencing technology improvised our understanding on the community-wide microbial diversity. Despite the added advantages, it is still a challenge to cultivate the majority of the microbial population. In some cases, the synchrony of the detected species between culture-independent and culture-dependent techniques were as low as 15%4.
Majority of the estimated microorganisms in natural environments exist in the form of biofilms5, and in totality, they account for ~80% of available prokaryotic cells6. Microbial biofilm is widely distributed in environments7, including terrestrial habitats8,9, water10,11, and human microcosms12,13. The terrestrial hot spring is a unique ecosystem for “extremophiles”, and has long been considered as a model habitat for exploring principles of microbial ecology14,15,16,17. Hot spring microbial mats (HSMMs) represent the most complex community, in which bacterial cells stick to each other and the adherent cells embedded within the extracellular matrix. HSMMs are usually close self-sustaining small ecosystems, with total inclusion of basic biogeochemical cycles and food chains18. The structure of these communities was well described in previous studies18,19,20. The dominant members of these HSMMs are usually the filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs (FAPs), comprising of Chloroflexus spp. and Roseiflexus spp. of the phylum Chloroflexi. Primary productions in this habitat are generally driven by FAPs and Cyanobacteria18, but in certain cases, it is only the FAPs that reside therein19. Further, they are the renewable biomass resource for the production of industrial chemicals; for instance, 3-hydroxypropionate, an intermediate of the hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate cycle in FAPs, is an important precursor for the synthesis of bioplastics21. Majority of the FAPs and related bacteria have still not been cultivated, and the lack of culture is the main hindrance in understanding the community structure and mechanism of the biogeochemical cycles in this environment.
Co-occurrence network is routinely used to analyze the potential interactions among community members, to seek microbial social modules and to estimate the importance of a particular operational taxonomic unit (OTU) in a community22,23. We hypothesize that “key node” bacteria with high-degree centricity in a microbial community network play the role of organizing and regulating the community by facilitating the neighboring members, using any of the following mechanisms: (1) decompose organic matters (including apoptotic bacterial cell) produced by autotrophic cells to provide essential nutrients for other members; (2) produce acidic or alkalescent metabolites during the cell growth to buffer the pH value of the environment24; (3) regulate the environmental adaptability of other bacteria by providing specific nutrients, such as some growth factor25; (4) eliminate toxic metabolites like H2O226 to facilitate cells from inhibitory stress; (5) supply quorum-sensing signal molecules to induce colony formation27. In this study, we processed a “key node” growth-promoting species to target and isolate previously uncultivated strains of the phylum Chloroflexi within HSMMs. Samples investigated in this study include a large number of hot springs located in Southwestern China.
Environmental parameters of the sampled hot springs
The physicochemical parameters of the hot springs selected for this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The temperature and pH recorded in these hot springs were in the range of 45.0–71.7 °C and 6.5–8.0, respectively. The hot springs of Qucian (QC), Quchomo village (QZM), Kunggyu geothermal area (DGQ), Moincer (MS), Molo’gyam (MLJ), and Langju geothermal area (LJ) presented a circumneutral pH (6.5–7.0), while Bar hot spring (BAR) and Daggyai geothermal area (DGJ) were nearly neutral to slightly alkaline (pH 6.5–8.0). The three sampling sites in Rehai National Park (Y1, Y2, and Y3) are newly formed HSMMs but had been meddled with human activities, possibly during the construction and subsequent renovation of the scenic spot. The sample A96 from DGJ, Tibet (52 °C, pH 8.0; Fig. 1) is a well-developed HSMM measuring 2–3 cm in thickness, and no sign of human activity was detected during our sampling.
Community structure and co-occurrence network analysis
A total of 2,173,872 quality barcode amplicons reads were obtained from 26 HSMM samples with an average of 83,610 sequence reads per sample (Supplementary Table 2). These sequence reads were clustered into 1674 OTUs at the specific level. Following filtering of the OTUs related to uncultured bacteria, 456 OTUs were annotated at the generic level. Ninety of these OTUs were determined as key nodes in the co-occurrence network analysis (Fig. 2). The mean relative abundance of the majority of these genera was <1% with the exception of OTUs related to Meiothermus (Fig. 2b). The peripheral nodes in the network comprised 253 OTUs, with the genera Chloroflexus (13.9%), Thermus (11.05%), and Roseiflexus (8.44%) accounting for 64.8% of the total peripheral nodes (Fig. 2b).
Key-node species and spent-culture medium (SCM) preparation
Among the OTUs identified as key nodes in the entire network, members of the genera Tepidimonas, Geobacillus, Meiothermus, and Sphingomonas (Supplementary Fig. 1) have been previously isolated by our laboratory from hot spring samples using traditional agar plate method. For preparation of SCM, a preliminary growth-promotion assay of these key-node species from our culture collection was performed. These species had different growth physiology, e.g., Sphingomonas sp. SYSU G00007 grew at 45 °C but not at 55 °C, while Meiothermus sp. SYSU GA4201 grew at both the temperatures. For the growth-promotion assay, a slow-growing Chloroflexus sp. strain SYSU G00190R (also isolated during another earlier study; hereafter referred to as 190R) was selected as the indicator organism. The indicator Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R showed closed similarity (99.2% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity) to peripheral node bacterium Chloroflexus islandicus isl-2 (LWQS01000112). The Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R grew at both 45 °C and 55 °C after 1-week incubation under dark conditions. In the growth promotion assay using a cross-inoculation method, the growth of Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R was promoted when inoculated along with Tepidimonas sp. SYSU G00190W (referred hereafter as 190W; Supplementary Fig. 1). The Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R showed good growth on R2A agar supplemented with 10% and 20% spent-culture supernatants of Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W, moderate growth when supplemented with 1% and 5% spent-culture supernatant, but not on the plates induced with cell-free extract (Supplementary Fig. 2). Of five harvesting time periods tested, supernatants collected at 8, 12, and 24 h produce significant growth enhancement (p < 0.05) to Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R (Fig. 3a). Among the three time intervals, the growth enhancement by 12 and 24 h supernatants on Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R was significant at p < 0.001 as well. Based on the findings of the above assays, the 24 h spend culture supernatants of Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W was selected for preparation of spent-culture medium (SCM) for use in the isolation and culturing of the slow or previously uncultivated bacteria particularly related to the phylum Chloroflexi from the HSMM samples.
Standard media- vs SCM-based isolation
Applying the traditional isolation method on the standard isolation media (Supplementary Table 3) and on SCM, a total of 319 isolates distributed in eight phyla (4 Acidobacteria, 5 Actinobacteria, 3 Aquificae, 6 Bacteroidetes, 69 Chloroflexi, 142 Deinococcus-Thermus, 13 Firmicutes, and 77 Proteobacteria) (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 4) were isolated from the HSMM samples. Seventy-five percent (239 strains) of these strains were isolated using the SCM plates. Members of the phylum Chloroflexi were more frequently isolated on the SCM plates (57) in comparison with the standard isolation media. Further, the Roseiflexus spp. and Chloroflexus (Group 14 and 15; Fig. 4b) were isolated only on the SCM plates. The Group 40 (closely related to Chloroflexus islandicus, Fig. 4b) was, however, isolated on both the standard and SCM plates, but the growth was most prominent on the SCM plates (Supplementary Fig. 4). When the isolates with low 16S rRNA gene identities (<90%) were cloned and the almost full-length sequences determined, four isolates presented distinct lineages in the pre-aligned ARB tree (SILVA LTPs132_SSU database) (Supplementary Fig. 5). Two of these isolates belong to the phylum Chloroflexi, and the other two of the phyla Bacteroidetes and Chlorobi.
Efficacy of the SCM-based isolation was validated by subculturing all the 113 potential novel bacterial species isolated in the study onto R2A agar, T5 agar, CC agar, and Thermus 162 agar media (Supplementary Table 3), all of which are effectively used for growing thermophiles. All the strains effectively grew on the SCM plates, while limited strains could grow on Thermus 162 agar (5 strains), R2A agar (8 strains), and none on either T5 agar or CC agar.
Comparative metabolomics of spent cultures
As the growth promotion on Chloroflexus spp. was observed with SCM, it was hypothesized that Tepidimonas sp. may have a strong ability to synthesize and excrete compounds. To test the hypothesis, comparative analyses were conducted between Tepidimonas and Chloroflexus genomes. The genomes of Tepidimonas have significantly higher (p < 0.001) genes related to transport and binding proteins as compared with Chloroflexus (Supplementary Fig. 6), but the metabolites excreted were still beyond our speculations. The full range of low-molecular-weight organic substances (LMWOS) of Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W was determined by analyzing the non-targeted extracellular metabolomes collected at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 48 h (see “Methods”). Of 412 compounds detected in the extracts, 83 were significantly accumulated (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Table 5). Amino acids and analogues were accumulated mostly at the end of the lag growth phase (4 h). In the exponential phase (8 h), concentration of these compounds decrease, and synchronically the compounds isopentenyladenine, cytosine, pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, and hydroxypyruvate started accumulating. At the end of the exponential growth phase (12 h), components like adenine decrease to a very low level (from fivefolds to onefold). After another 12 h in stationary phase (24 h), a large number of small molecular compounds started accumulating. These include compounds of the following categories: nucleosides and analogues, indoles and derivatives, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, organoheterocyclic compounds, pteridines and derivatives, purines and purine derivatives, and quinolines and derivatives. Accumulation of the nucleosides and analogues (2–78.9-folds increase) were most prominent among all the categories of the LMWOS, particularly the deoxycytidine (a 78.9-folds increase). The other compounds in this category include 2′-deoxyadenosine, 5′-deoxyadenosine, 3′-deoxyadenosine, cytosine, thymidine, adenine, cytarabine, and cytidine. In addition, indoles and derivatives (well-known growth regulators), including indole acetaldehyde, indole, melatonin, uracil, 3-indoleacetic acid, and 5-hydroxyindoleacetaldehyde, were accumulated during this phase. The proportion of indole, melatonin, and uracil was remarkably accumulated (3.3–13.4-folds; p < 0.001) in the stationary phase when compared with their concentrations at the end of the exponential growth phase (12 h).
Fifteen commercially available metabolites (Supplementary Table 6) that were found accumulated in the 190W supernatant were procured and tested for growth promotion using nine representative Chloroflexi and Bacteriodetes strains isolated in this study (Supplementary Fig. 7). Among these compounds, pantothenic acid (VB5) and 3-indoleacetic acid (IAA) facilitate growth promotion of all the tested strains (Supplementary Fig. 7). Imidazole acetic acid and deoxycytidine showed enhance growth to Chloroflexus strains, while putrescine improved the growth of Roseoflexus strains. Further, uracil, cytosine, and adenine also facilitate the growth of other Chloroflexi, but the enhanced growth OD of the representative Bacteroidetes isolate was observed only with VB5.
Although sufficient efforts have been made in culturomics, the “Great Plate Count Anomaly”28 is still a puzzle, and hitherto uncultured microorganisms are vividly imaged as microbial “dark matters”3. For a long period, the attributes of the microbial community interactions were not fully considered. Microorganisms thrive in complex multispecies communities rather than as separate entities under in situ environments, and complex interactions take place frequently among inhabitants. Cell to cell distances in HSMMs is short enough (~100 μm) for diffusible metabolites to reach the neighboring cells within the microscale cell aggregates29. Bacterial interactions in the community can determine the fate of bacterial populations24, which is the most complex environmental factor because it is elusive, and varies as members interact with different community members, besides altering the chemicals response during the interactions. Microbial mats in the effluent channels of the alkaline siliceous hot springs are among the most intensively studied natural microbial communities and serve as model systems for exploring general ecological principles in microbial ecology.
Construction of network with OTUs at the generic level avoids the effects incurring from important but uncultured OTUs. Filtering of these unclassified OTUs also resulted in the filtering of some key node bacteria. This process however guaranteed that all the top identified OTUs are easily cultivated microbes. Another advantage of selecting the top centric key nodes is that isolates such as members of the genus Anaerosolibacter that are strictly anaerobic were filtered and that all the isolation and culturing employed in this study was conducted in aerobic conditions.
As opposed to our original proposition of using the network modularity to predict nodes directly connected with the genus Chloroflexus into a module subnetwork with closely associated members, OTUs of the genus Chloroflexus were found mostly on the peripheral node in the entire network, and were not admitted into any module. This finding suggested that the community attributes of Chloroflexus may not be obvious in the network, and needs facilitation from other members. To further explore the characters of these vertexes, the abundance of OTUs was mapped to each node. The abundant members particularly genera Chloroflexus and Roseiflexus were distributed as peripheral vertexes, while the key nodes were largely members of rare bacterial taxa particularly of genus Tepidimonas (relative abundance, 0.014%). We concluded that the abundant members attributing significant ecological function may not be robust in community regulation, such as transfer of small molecular metabolites that are necessary for cell–cell interaction. On the contrary, the microbial community within HSMMs was sustained by the rare members with high centrality by facilitating the basic metabolisms of abundant members. A similar observation was made in Lake Ecosystem as well30. We, therefore, select the key nodes with top 20% degree centrality i.e., have most links with other members in the network, as potential growth promoter.
Over the past several years, several culturomics strategies have been designed to increase the efficacy of isolation of previously uncultured members of microbiota in different environments. Some focused on improving the isolating media, by making the components similar to the sample condition31,32,33,34, while others physically separated cells to avoid microbial competition and allowed the growth of slow-growing bacteria35,36. Few studies inferred the biological features from genome data37,38,39 to target a particular bacterium, while some considered specific factors, such as catalase or pyruvate to eliminate growth stress40,41. Few groups further assessed by modifying the methods of media preparation to effective culture different microorganisms42,43,44,45, while others emphasized on the role of growth factors released by partner bacterium for cultivation of previously uncultured spp46. However, discoveries of novel strains through these methods are getting limited, which greatly hinder our understanding of microorganisms and their environmental processes.
As there is no report of using either network-directed isolation techniques, or successful isolation if attempted earlier, we focus this study on the community attributes of microorganisms. Microorganisms do not exist as a single entity in the in situ environment, but tend to live in communities consisting of myriad diverse and interacting species. For individuals therein, interspecific interactions like cross-feeding occurred frequently; as a result, the surrounding microorganisms represent the most complex and critical environmental factor. Microorganisms have complex interactions, such as symbiosis, cooperation, and competition. In the process of long-term cooperative coevolution, some microbes result in dramatic differentiations, including loss of function as part of their need to grow and adopt basic biological metabolism ability. Approximately 98% of the environmental microbes are auxotroph47, and promote the sociality between microbes through collaboration. This network is the foundation of the microbial diversity and community stability.
In the co-occurrence network map (Fig. 2), a total of 90 key nodes were confirmed, of which four nodes related to genera Geobacillus, Meiothermus, Sphingomonas, and Tepidimonas were mapped to previously isolated strains in our collection. Members of these genera have been previously reported as prototrophic microbes producing potential growth-promoting factors48,49,50, Two of the genera Tepidimonas and Geobacillus showed strong growth-promotion activity on Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R (Supplementary Fig. 1). On the other hand, Sphingomonas sp. SYSU G00007 and Meiothermus sp. SYSU GA4201 showed only weak growth-promotion activities on Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R. One probable reason is that Sphingomonas sp. SYSU G00007 showed growth only at 45 °C and not at 55 °C, the optimal growth temperature for Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R. As for the Meiothermus sp. SYSU GA4201, despite having good growth at 55 °C, it did not show obvious activity at the edge of ecological amplitude which may be related to the limited predictability of network employed in this study.
Between the Tepidimonas and Geobacillus isolates, the Tepidimonas strain 190W secretes more growth-promoting biomass that spread over a wide spectrum of metabolites, and was selected as targeted strain for SCM preparation. The devised medium SCM was highly successful in cultivation of many previously uncultured bacteria, including members of the targeted phylum Chloroflexi. The presentation of two further distinct lineages of the phyla Bacteroidetes SYSU GT96-39-2 and Chlorobi SYSU GT96-40-1, besides the two distinct lineages of the targeted Chloroflexi, suggested that effects of the spent-culture supernatants in SCM were not restricted only to the targeted organisms but also to other hard-growing microbes.
An important aspect of this study was that supernatant, rather than the intracellular extracts, was more important in promoting the growth of indicator organisms. The growth of Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R was strongly facilitated by spent-culture supernatant of Tepidimonas strain 190W, but not by cell-free extracts (Supplementary Fig. 4). This finding suggested that the effective constituents are not the remnants of apoptotic cells, but the active metabolites secreted by the effector organisms. This conclusion was further confirmed by the comparative analyses between the genomes of Chloroflexus spp. and Tepidimonas spp., including characteristics involved in intracellular transport and cellular secretion. Functions of each protein-coding gene were analyzed based on the TIGR assignments. The Tepidimonas genomes have significant higher (p < 0.001) genes coding for transport and binding proteins in comparison with Chloroflexus (Supplementary Fig. 6). We assumed that these gene products of the Tepidimonas spp. might facilitate the secretion of diverse secondary metabolites into the surrounding extracellular space, which is then taken up by the other targeted microbes as nutrient resources or growth factors. This assumption is consistent with the diverse metabolites detected in the supernatant from Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W.
Metabolome analysis of the supernatant in stationary growth phase detected the accumulation of large numbers of metabolites. Few of the LMWOS were frequently reported as necessary nutrients for the growth of bacteria34. In our experimental verification, the increase in growth OD of all representative strains by supplementation of VB5 and IAA proved that production of these growth-promoting factors in the spent culture have positive impact on bacterial growth, possibly facilitating the isolation of previously uncultivated bacteria51,52,53,54. All the tested compounds showed different degree of activities against selected bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 7). As for instance, cytosine greatly improved the growth of strain Chloroflexus sp. GY3-101, but not strain Chloroflexus sp.SYSU GY1-5 (Supplementary Fig. 7). Uracil, cytosine, and adenine (compounds necessary for cell division during cell proliferation) facilitated the growth of most of the tested strains. We could not, however, predict any correlation between the concentration of the metabolites and its growth enhancing effect. The two most accumulated metabolites deoxycytidine (78.9-folds increase) and isopentenyladenine (44.8×) were reported as effective growth promoters55,56,57, but none were found to have enhance effect in our study. Besides, this study was limited to screening of their individual effectiveness, and as a result correlation effect of different combination of these compounds and possible intra- and interspecies chemical signaling between different microorganisms could not predicted from this limited study. At the most, we could say that the metabolites secreted by Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W contained a large variety of bacterial growth-promoting or regulating compounds, which enhances the culturing of many previously uncultivated bacteria.
Our work further provides strong experimental evidence that key-node bacteria is critical for rapid and easy cultivation of hard and slow-growing strains in the laboratory condition. By providing evidence for the relationship between Tepidimonas and Chloroflexus isolates, our study further advances the understanding of the critical growth-promoting roles played by Tepidimonas in the isolation of Chloroflexi from HSMMs. In summary, network-directed isolation using SCM is effective for obtaining previously uncultivated bacteria from HSMMs.
Field measurements and sample collection
A total of 26 HSMMs samples were collected from Tibet (August 2015, August 2016, August 2018) and Yunnan (December 2017), southwest China. These samples were distributed into nine sampling areas: QZM, QC, DGJ, DGQ, MS, MLJ, BAR, and LJ in Tibet and Rehai (Y1, Y2, and Y3) in Yunnan (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table 1). Most of the sampling sites are small pools with an outflow path, along which good biofilms or mats are developed. Both temperature and pH of the sampling sites were measured in situ. After the field environmental parameters were measured, the microbial mat samples (including few sediments) were collected into 50-mL sterile sample tubes, and placed either on dry ice (used for environmental DNA extraction) or kept at room temperature (for bacteria isolation). The sample marked A96 from DGJ include both from the center and bottom of the middle outflow of the biggest geyser (Fig. 1b). The Rehai sample Y1 was a dark green steam mat located 1 mile away from the hot spring source, Y2 a brownish-red mat stick on the bottom of the steam, and Y3 a yellow biofilm in the outlet and green cyanobacteria-like mats of the surrounding. For this study, all samples were used for high-throughput sequencing, network analysis and isolation of potential growth-promoting strains, while samples Y1–Y3 from Yunnan and A96 from Tibet were used for bacterial isolation.
High-throughput sequencing and co-occurrence network analysis
The total DNA was extracted from 0.5 g samples using the Fast DNA SPIN Kit for Soil according to the manufacturer’s instruction (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH, USA). Amplification of the V4 region was done using the primer 515F (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTA-3′)/806R (5′-GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT-3′), the bar-coded amplicons from each sample pooled together with equimolar concentrations and sequenced by an Illumina MiSeq platform. Primer sequences of the paired reads and the bases with low Phred scores at the ends of the reads were removed using Cutadapt58, applying the following parameters: -e 0.15 –m 100 –trim-n –discard-untrimmed –q 15,10. The paired-end reads were assembled and denoised by the dada2 plugin59 in QIIME260; chimera sequences were removed and unique sequences clustered by the same plugin. Contamination related to the mitochondria, chloroplast, and cyanobacteria were removed by QIIME2 taxa filter-table and filter-seqs methods using the SILVA 132 database taxonomy assignment in feature-classifier plugin. The OTU representative sequences were then clustered at 100% similarity, and their taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA 132 database via QIIME2 classify-sklearn command with default settings. The relative abundances of the OTUs in each sample were used to generate correlation matrices for visualizing interactions between different taxa. OTUs unclassified at the generic level were not considered for generating the co-occurrence network analysis. Pairwise Spearman correlations, R score, and p-value were calculated between these OTUs using the Hmisc package version 4.1.1, and only OTUs with strong Spearman’s correlation coefficient (R > |± 0.6| at p < 0.05) were considered. These correlations were visualized using igraph package version 1.2.1.
Each node (or vertex) in the network represents an OTU (or a genus), and each edge indicates a strong and significant correlation. All analyses were performed in R version 3.5.0. The degree of centrality of each node was measured to determine the importance of nodes in the network (Fig. 2b). Accordingly, all the nodes were classified into three categories based on the abundance of links with other members in the network: key nodes (vertexes with the top 20% centrality), peripheral nodes (vertexes with last 20% centrality), and moderate nodes (rest of the vertexes). All analyses were performed by using psych package version 1.8.4.
Determination of growth-promoting isolates
Key-node bacteria in the network were treated as the potential growth-promoting microorganisms and peripheral node as the indicator bacterium. Here, we have selected a Chloroflexus islandicus strain SYSU G100190R as the indicator bacterium. This strain was revived in an R2A broth, and streaked into a single colony on the R2A agar plate. Representative growth-promoting strains present in the key nodes of the network were cross-streaked on the same plate, and kept incubated at 55 °C under dark conditions unless otherwise mentioned. The growth of the indicator bacterium was observed every 24 h by observing for possible growth of any biofilm on the culture plates.
Spent-culture medium preparation
The selected growth-promoting strain (Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W) was grown into a conical flask containing R2A broth under shaking condition (55 °C, 180 rpm, dark). After attainment of the stationary growth phase, the supernatant and cell fractions were separated by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min). The cells were re-suspended in 10 ml of PBS buffer (pH 8.0) and disrupted by ultrasonication (Sonics VC751, USA). The resulting lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The cell-free extracts (cell lysate) and supernatant were filter-sterilized (0.22 μm, Millipore, USA) and added to the R2A agar. The efficacy of the various media supplements was determined by observing the growth of the indicator strain (Chloroflexus sp. strain 190R) on R2A agar, R2A + 20%/10%/5%/1% supernatant and R2A + cell-free extract following 3-day incubation at 55 °C under aerobic and dark conditions.
The optimal growth enhancement of the selected supplement was further determined from a time-course biomass assay of the indicator Chloroflexus sp. 190R incubated with supernatant harvested at different time intervals. For this experiment, the growth curve of the Tepidimonas sp. strain 190W was determined by measuring the optical density (590 nm) of the cells grown in R2A broth for 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h at 55 °C. Simultaneously, a series of R2A broth media were prepared by supplementing with 10% spent-culture supernatants of Tepidimonas sp. 190W harvested from 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h cultures. To these media, 1 mL aliquots of the indicator strain Chloroflexus sp. 190R were incubated (3 days, 55 °C, 180 rpm, dark). Cell concentrations were calculated by measuring the optical density (OD) at 590 nm using microplate reader (Synergy H1, BioTek Instruments, Inc, USA). All the experiments were conducted with three repeats. The optimal harvesting period of the 10% spent-culture supernatant was finally selected for preparation of the SCM based on the observed biomass production. The basal isolation media for SCM preparation for the present study is R2A agar.
Isolation using the standard and network-directed methods
Traditional isolation method included serial dilution plating on R2A, CC, T5, and Thermus 162 media (Supplementary Table 3), and incubation at 55 °C under aerobic and dark conditions for 1 week. Routine culturing of the purified strains was done on R2A medium at 45 °C. The strains were also maintained as cells suspension in glycerol (20%, w/v) at −80 °C for further use. Network-directed isolation method (referred hitherto as SCM isolation) (Fig. 1c) involved serial dilution plating on SCM (R2A + 24 h 10% spent-culture supernatant of Tepidimonas sp. 190W).
DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification, sequencing, and identification
Genomic DNA of isolates was extracted by heating a loopfull of cultured bacteria cells in about 5-volume of 10% Chelex 100 (Bio-Rad, USA) suspension at 100 °C for 30 min61. PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene were done using the primer pair PA-PB (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in a thermal cycler set with the following program: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of amplification involving denaturation (94 °C, 45 s), annealing (56 °C, 30 s) and extension (72 °C, 90 s), and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min62. The amplicon was purified using a PCR purification kit (Sangon Biotech Co.). Sequencing was performed in a single direction using universal 16S rRNA primers. Strains showing sequence identities below 95.3% were selected and cloned to generate almost-complete sequences. All sequencing was carried out at Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Identity to validly described species was identified using the EzBioCloud database (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/). Previously uncultured isolates were also compared with published uncultured gene sequences via the nucleotide BLAST search at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Candidates for novel species were temporarily defined by sequence similarity threshold of 98.7%63. Similarly, candidate for novel genus and higher taxa were categorized using the 16S rRNA gene sequence identity threshold of 95.3- 90.0% and <90%, respectively64.
Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences (~800 bp) were aligned using CLUSTAL_X65. Gaps at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the alignment were manually removed. Phylogenetic analyses applying maximum-likelihood algorithm were performed using IQ-TREE version 1.6.1066, with the parameter “-alrt 1000 -bb 1000”. The topology of the phylogenetic trees was evaluated by the bootstrap resampling with 1000 replicates. The phylogeny of the isolates with lower similarities (<95.3%) was generated with the almost-complete 16S rRNA gene sequence in the pre-aligned tree using ARB database67.
Comparative genomics analysis
Eight draft genomes of the genera Tepidiomonas and Chloroflexus were retrieved from the JGI database (https://jgi.doe.gov/). Functional annotations of the genes within these genomes were performed using TIGRfam and the DOE-JGI microbial genome annotation68. Statistical analyses of p-value and functional gene categories were calculated with ggpubr version 0.2 and ggplot2 version 2.2.1 in R version 3.5.0, respectively.
Non-targeted metabolomics analysis of extracellular secretions
For extraction of the metabolites in the spent medium supernatant, 100-μL bacterial culture broth was taken into a 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged (14,000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was transferred to a fresh 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube. Finally, four volumes of pre-chilled methanol were added, gently mixed, and incubated overnight at −80 °C. The mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant transferred to a fresh Eppendorf tube. The pellet was dried using liquid N2, and stored in −80 °C freezer until further use.
The non-targeted metabolomics analysis was performed using Q Exactive Orbitrap LC-MS (Thermo, CA). One microliter of the supernatant was loaded to a normal phase chromatography column, and the sample eluted to an orbitrap mass spectrometer with 50% ACN containing 10 mM ammonium formate as eluent. Data with mass ranges of m/z 80-1200 and m/z 70-1050 were acquired at positive ion mode and negative ion mode, respectively, with data-dependent MS-MS acquisition. The full scan and fragment spectra were collected with a resolution of 70,000 and 17,500, respectively. The source parameters were: spray voltage: 3000 V; capillary temperature: 320 °C; heater temperature: 300 °C; sheath gas flow rate: 35; auxiliary gas flow rate: 10. Metabolite identification was based on Trace finder search with the home-built database. Metabolomic data analyses were then performed using MetaboAnalyst 3.069.
List of the selected fifteen compounds (metabolites) and the concentration of each of these metabolites for growth-promotion assay are listed in Supplementary Table 6. All compounds in analytical grade are procured from Aladdin Chemical Reagent Co. (China), except isopentenyladenine and hydroxypyruvate which are from Sigma. For the assay, 10-μL cell suspension of each of the representative strain grown in SCM-R2A broth was collected, centrifuged, and washed. These cells were inoculated into a 24-well culture plate (ThermoFisher), each well containing 1 mL R2A broth supplemented with one of the tested compounds. One well containing 1 mL of R2A broth without any compound was used as the negative control and another with 1 mL of SCM-R2A broth as positive control. The plate was incubated in an aerobic chamber, and kept incubated at 45 °C or 55 °C for 1 week. Cell concentrations were measured by observing the optical density (OD) at 590 nm using a microplate reader (Synergy H1, BioTek Instruments, Inc, USA). All the experiments were conducted with three repeats. Statistical analyses were calculated with tidyr version 0.8.3 and ggplot2 version 2.2.1 in R version 3.5.0.
Raw sequences from the 16S Illumina sequencing of the Tibet hot spring samples are deposited at the Sequence Read Archive (SRP101393) in the NCBI under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA562830. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the putative novel taxa isolated during the study are deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under accession numbers MK714221-MK714339.
Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. T. & Scannell, J. W. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10494–10499 (2002).
Chun, J. et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 68, 461–466 (2018).
Lok, C. Mining the microbial dark matter. Nature 522, 270–273 (2015).
Bilen, M. et al. The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species. Microbiome 6, 94 (2018).
Nikolaev, Y. A. & Plakunov, V. K. Biofilm—“City of microbes” or an analogue of multicellular organisms? Microbiology 76, 125–138 (2007).
Flemming, H.-C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260 (2019).
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108 (2004).
Gorbushina, A. A. Life on the rocks. Environ. Microbiol 9, 1613–1631 (2007).
Portillo, M. C. & Gonzalez, J. M. Differential effects of distinct bacterial biofilms in a cave environment. Curr. Microbiol. 60, 435–438 (2010).
Besemer, K., Singer, G., Hödl, I. & Battin, T. J. Bacterial community composition of stream biofilms in spatially variable-flow environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7189–7195 (2009).
Zhang, W. et al. Marine biofilms constitute a bank of hidden microbial diversity and functional potential. Nat. Commun. 10, 517 (2019).
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S. & Greenberg, E. P. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318–1322 (1999).
Bjarnsholt, T. The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS 121, 1–58 (2013).
Phoenix, V. R., Bennett, P. C., Engel, A. S., Tyler, S. W. & Ferris, F. G. Chilean high-altitude hot-spring sinters: a model system for UV screening mechanisms by early Precambrian cyanobacteria. Geobiology 4, 15–28 (2006).
Zaher, M. A., Ehara, S. & El-Qady, G. Conceptual model and numerical simulation of the hydrothermal system in Hammam Faraun hot spring, Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Arab. J. Geosci. 4, 161–170 (2011).
Pavlov, S. K. & Chudnenko, K. V. Formation of nitrogen-rich hot springs: modeling physicochemical interactions in a water-granite system. Geochem. Int. 51, 981–993 (2013).
Cole, J. et al. Phototrophic biofilm assembly in microbial-mat-derived unicyanobacterial consortia: model systems for the study of autotroph-heterotroph interactions. Front. Microbiol. 5, 109 (2014).
Rozanov, A. S., Bryanskaya, A. V., Ivanisenko, T. V., Malup, T. K. & Peltek, S. E. Biodiversity of the microbial mat of the Garga hot spring. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 254 (2017).
Klatt, C. G. et al. Community structure and function of high-temperature chlorophototrophic microbial mats inhabiting diverse geothermal environments. Front. Microbiol. 4, 106 (2013).
Thiel, V. et al. The dark side of the mushroom spring microbial mat: life in the shadow of chlorophototrophs. I. Microbial diversity based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons and metagenomic sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 7, 919 (2016).
Liu, B. et al. Efficient production of 3-hydroxypropionate from fatty acids feedstock in Escherichia coli. Met. Engineer 51, 121–130 (2019).
Faust, K. & Raes, J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 538–550 (2012).
Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E911–E920 (2015).
Ratzke, C. & Gore, J. Modifying and reacting to the environmental pH can drive bacterial interactions. PLoS Biol. 16, e2004248 (2018).
Xie, B. et al. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii thermal tolerance enhancement mediated by a mutualistic interaction with vitamin B12-producing bacteria. ISME J. 7, 1544–1555 (2013).
Ma, L., Calfee, B. C., Morris, J. J., Johnson, Z. I. & Zinser, E. R. Degradation of hydrogen peroxide at the ocean’s surface: the influence of the microbial community on the realized thermal niche of Prochlorococcus. ISME J. 12, 473–484 (2018).
Tan, C. H. et al. Community quorum sensing signalling and quenching: microbial granular biofilm assembly. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 1, 15006 (2015).
Staley, J. T. & Konopka, A. Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 321–346 (1985).
Cordero, O. X. & Datta, M. S. Microbial interactions and community assembly at microscales. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 227–234 (2016).
Xue, Y. et al. Distinct patterns and processes of abundant and rare eukaryotic plankton communities following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom. ISME J. 12, 2263–2277 (2018).
Kaeberlein, T., Lewis, K. & Epstein, S. S. Isolating “uncultivable” microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated natural environment. Science 296, 1127–1129 (2002).
Ferrari, B. C., Winsley, T., Gillings, M. & Binnerup, S. Cultivating previously uncultured soil bacteria using a soil substrate membrane system. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1261–1269 (2008).
Berdy, B., Spoering, A. L., Ling, L. L. & Epstein, S. S. In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2232 (2017).
Nguyen, T. M. et al. Effective soil extraction method for cultivating previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e01145–01118 (2018).
Jiang, C.-Y. et al. High-throughput single-cell cultivation on microfluidic streak plates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 2210–2218 (2016).
Huys, G. R. B. & Raes, J. Go with the flow or solitary confinement: a look inside the single-cell toolbox for isolation of rare and uncultured microbes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 44, 1–8 (2018).
Wurch, L. et al. Genomics-informed isolation and characterization of a symbiotic Nanoarchaeota system from a terrestrial geothermal environment. Nat. Commun. 7, 12115 (2016).
Woyke, T., Doud, D. F. R. & Schulz, F. The trajectory of microbial single-cell sequencing. Nat. Methods 14, 1045 (2017).
Yu, T. et al. Growth of sedimentary Bathyarchaeota on lignin as an energy source. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 6022–6027 (2018).
Martin, S. E., Flowers, R. S. & Ordal, Z. J. Catalase: its effect on microbial enumeration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 32, 731–734 (1976).
Imazaki, I. & Kobori, Y. Improving the culturability of freshwater bacteria using FW70, a low-nutrient solid medium amended with sodium pyruvate. Can. J. Microbiol. 56, 333–341 (2010).
Tamaki, H., Hanada, S., Sekiguchi, Y., Tanaka, Y. & Kamagata, Y. Effect of gelling agent on colony formation in solid cultivation of microbial community in lake sediment. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1827–1834 (2009).
Hara, S., Isoda, R., Tahvanainen, T. & Hashidoko, Y. Trace amounts of furan-2-carboxylic acids determine the quality of solid agar plates for bacterial culture. PLoS ONE 7, e41142 (2012).
Tanaka, T. et al. A hidden pitfall in the preparation of agar media undermines microorganism cultivability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 7659–7666 (2014).
Kato, S. et al. Isolation of previously uncultured slow-growing bacteria by using a simple modification in the preparation of agar media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e00807–00818 (2018).
Bhuiyan, M. N. I. et al. Zincmethylphyrins and coproporphyrins, novel growth factors released by Sphingopyxis sp., enable laboratory cultivation of previously uncultured Leucobacter sp. through interspecies mutualism. J. Antibiot. 69, 97–103 (2016).
Zengler, K. & Zaramela, L. S. The social network of microorganisms—how auxotrophies shape complex communities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 383–390 (2018).
Ogita, N., Hashidoko, Y., Limin, S. H. & Tahara, S. Linear 3-hydroxybutyrate tetramer (HB4) produced by Sphingomonas sp. is characterized as a growth promoting factor for some rhizomicrofloral composers. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70, 2325–2329 (2006).
Rafique, M., Sultan, T., Ortas, I. & Chaudhary, H. J. Enhancement of maize plant growth with inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and biochar amendment in soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 63, 460–469 (2017).
Itusha, A., Osborne, W. J. & Vaithilingam, M. Enhanced uptake of Cd by biofilm forming Cd resistant plant growth promoting bacteria bioaugmented to the rhizosphere of Vetiveria zizanioides. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 21, 487–495 (2019).
Barnett, J. W. & Robinson, F. A. Analogues of pantothenic acid: attempted preparation of growth promoters. Biochem. J. 36, 357–363 (1942).
Yao, C. X., Chou, J. D., Wang, T., Zhao, H. F. & Zhang, B. L. Pantothenic acid, vitamin C and biotin play important roles in the growth of Lactobacillus helveticus. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1194 (2018).
Zύñiga, A. et al. An engineered device for indoleacetic acid production under quorum sensing signals enables Cupriavidus pinatubonensis JMP134 to stimulate plant growth. ACS Synthet. Biol. 7, 1519–1527 (2018).
Husen, E. Screening of soil bacteria for plant growth promotion activities in vitro. Indo. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 27–31 (2016).
Stirk, W. A., Ördög, V. & Van Staden, J. Identification of the cytokinin isopentenyladenine in a strain of Arthronema africanum (Cyanobacteria). J. Phycol. 35, 89–92 (1999).
Dolecka, J., Urbanik-Sypniewska, T., Skrzydło-Radomańska, B. & Parada-Turska, J. Effect of kynurenic acid on the viability of probiotics in vitro. Pharmacol. Rep. 63, 548–551 (2011).
Lee, J.-H. & Lee, J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 426–444 (2010).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Hall, M. & Beiko, R. G. Methods in Molecular Biology: Microbiome Analysis, Ch. 8 (Humana Press, New York, 2018).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Walsh, P. S., Metzger, D. A. & Higuchi, R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 54, 134–139 (2013).
Yang, Z.-W. et al. Siccirubricoccus deserti gen. nov., sp. nov., a proteobacterium isolated from a desert sample. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 67, 4862–4867 (2017).
Kim, M., Oh, H.-S., Park, S.-C. & Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64, 346–351 (2014).
Yarza, P. et al. The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 31, 241–250 (2008).
Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D. G. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876–4882 (1997).
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
Ludwig, W. et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004).
Huntemann, M. et al. The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI microbial genome annotation pipeline (MGAP v.4). Stand. Genom. Sci. 10, 86 (2015).
Xia, J. & Wishart, D. S. Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for comprehensive metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Prot. Bioinformat. 55, 10.11–14.10.91 (2016).
This work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 91951205, 91751206, 31370154, 31600298, and 31850410475). W.J.L. is also supported by Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund (Grant no. 2018B020206001).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Xian, WD., Salam, N., Li, MM. et al. Network-directed efficient isolation of previously uncultivated Chloroflexi and related bacteria in hot spring microbial mats. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 6, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-020-0131-4
Enhanced Metabolic Potentials and Functional Gene Interactions of Microbial Stress Responses to a 4,100-m Elevational Increase in Freshwater Lakes
Frontiers in Microbiology (2021)
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2021)
Science of The Total Environment (2021)
Marine Life Science & Technology (2021)
Marine Life Science & Technology (2021)