Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Temperature sensitivity of woody nitrogen fixation across species and growing temperatures

Abstract

The future of the land carbon sink depends on the availability of nitrogen (N)1,2 and, specifically, on symbiotic N fixation3,4,5,6,7,8, which can rapidly alleviate N limitation. The temperature response of symbiotic N fixation has been hypothesized to explain the global distribution of N-fixing trees9,10 and is a key part of some terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs)3,7,8, yet there are few data to constrain the temperature response of symbiotic N fixation. Here we show that optimal temperatures for N fixation in four tree symbioses are in the range 29.0–36.9 °C, well above the 25.2 °C optimum currently used by TBMs. The shape of the response to temperature is also markedly different to the function used by TBMs (asymmetric rather than symmetric). We also show that N fixation acclimates to growing temperature (hence its range of optimal temperatures), particularly in our two tropical symbioses. Surprisingly, optimal temperatures were 5.2 °C higher for N fixation than for photosynthesis, suggesting that plant carbon and N gain are decoupled with respect to temperature. These findings may help explain why N-fixing tree abundance is highest where annual maximum temperatures are >35 °C (ref. 10) and why N-fixing symbioses evolved during a warm period in the Earth’s history11,12. Everything else being equal, our findings indicate that climate warming will probably increase N fixation, even in tropical ecosystems, in direct contrast to past projections8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Temperature response of N fixation in four tree species (columns) grown under a range of growing temperatures (rows).
Fig. 2: Optimal temperatures for woody N fixation are 3.9–11.7 °C higher than previously estimated by Houlton et al.9 and 1.8–7.3 °C higher than net photosynthesis.
Fig. 3: Optimal temperatures and rates at low and high temperatures show thermal acclimation of N fixation and photosynthesis.
Fig. 4: Prolonged exposure to high temperatures causes reduction in N fixation at a predictable rate.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data generated during this study are available on GitHub (https://github.com/tbytnero/Bytnerowicz-Akana-Griffin-Menge-N-fix-Temp; ref. 50).

Code availability

The R code with which data were analysed and figures created is available on GitHub (https://github.com/tbytnero/Bytnerowicz-Akana-Griffin-Menge-N-fix-Temp; ref. 50).

References

  1. Hungate, B. A., Dukes, J. S., Shaw, M. R., Luo, Y. & Field, C. B. Nitrogen and climate change. Science 302, 1512–1513 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sulman, B. N. et al. Diverse mycorrhizal associations enhance terrestrial C storage in a global model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 501–523 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Lawrence, D. M. & Bonan, G. B. Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 044016 (2015).

  5. Shi, M., Fisher, J. B., Brzostek, E. R. & Phillips, R. P. Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: global carbon cycle impact from an improved plant nitrogen cycle in the Community Land Model. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1299–1314 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyerholt, J., Zaehle, S. & Smith, M. J. Variability of projected terrestrial biosphere responses to elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 due to uncertainty in biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeosciences 13, 1491–1518 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, J. B. et al. Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: a mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB1014 (2010).

  8. Wang, Y. P. & Houlton, B. Z. Nitrogen constraints on terrestrial carbon uptake: Implications for the global carbon-climate feedback. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L24403 (2009).

  9. Houlton, B. Z., Wang, Y.-P., Vitousek, P. M. & Field, C. B. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454, 327–330 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steidinger, B. S. et al. Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest-tree symbioses. Nature 569, 404–408 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Velzen, R., Doyle, J. J. & Geurts, R. A resurrected scenario: single gain and massive loss of nitrogen-fixing nodulation. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 49–57 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mills, B. et al. Modelling the long-term carbon cycle, atmospheric CO2, and Earth surface temperature from late Neoproterozoic to present day. Gondwana Res. 67, 172–186 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fowler, D. et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130164 (2013).

  14. Rogers, A. et al. A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. New Phytol. 213, 22–42 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prévost, D., Antoun, H. & Bordeleau, L. M. Effects of low temperatures on nitrogenase activity in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) nodulated by Arctic rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 45, 205–210 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rainbird, R. M., Atkins, C. A. & Pate, J. S. Effect of temperature on nitrogenase functioning in cowpea nodules. Plant Physiol. 73, 392–394 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalton, D. A. & Zobel, D. B. Ecological aspects of nitrogen fixation by Purshia tridentata. Plant Soil 48, 57–80 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Waughman, G. J. The effect of temperature on nitrogenase activity. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 949–960 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wheeler, C. T. The causation of the diurnal changes in nitrogen fixation in the nodules of Alnus glutinosa. New Phytol. 70, 487–495 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schomberg, H. H. & Weaver, R. W. Nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and early growth of arrowleaf clover in response to root temperature and starter nitrogen. Agron. J. 84, 1046 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kou-Giesbrecht, S. & Menge, D. N. L. Nitrogen-fixing trees increase soil nitrous oxide emissions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 102, e03415 (2021).

  22. Bytnerowicz, T. A., Min, E., Griffin, K. L. & Menge, D. N. L. Repeatable, continuous and real‐time estimates of coupled nitrogenase activity and carbon exchange at the whole‐plant scale. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 960–970 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menge, D. N. L., Lichstein, J. W. & Ángeles-Pérez, G. Nitrogen fixation strategies can explain the latitudinal shift in nitrogen-fixing tree abundance. Ecology 95, 2236–2245 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Staccone, A. et al. A spatially explicit, empirical estimate of tree-based biological nitrogen fixation in forests of the United States. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, e2019GB006241 (2020).

  25. Cierjacks, A. et al. Biological flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. J. Ecol. 101, 1623–1640 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Benson, D. R. & Dawson, J. O. Recent advances in the biogeography and genecology of symbiotic Frankia and its host plants. Physiol. Plant. 130, 318–330 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumarathunge, D. P. et al. Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale. New Phytol. 222, 768–784 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heskel, M. A. et al. Convergence in the temperature response of leaf respiration across biomes and plant functional types. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3832–3837 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kou-Giesbrecht, S. et al. A novel representation of biological nitrogen fixation and competitive dynamics between nitrogen-fixing and non-fixing plants in a land model (GFDL LM4.1-BNF). Biogeosciences 18, 4143–4183 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hardy, R. W. F., Holsten, R. D., Jackson, E. K. & Burns, R. C. The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 43, 1185–1207 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cassar, N., Bellenger, J. P., Jackson, R. B., Karr, J. & Barnett, B. A. N2 fixation estimates in real-time by cavity ring-down laser absorption spectroscopy. Oecologia 168, 335–342 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor, B. N., Chazdon, R. L. & Menge, D. N. L. Successional dynamics of nitrogen fixation and forest growth in regenerating Costa Rican rainforests. Ecology 100, e02637 (2019).

  34. Kok, B. A Critical Consideration of the Quantum Yield of Chlorella-Photosynthesis (W. Junk, 1948).

  35. Liang, L. L. et al. Macromolecular rate theory (MMRT) provides a thermodynamics rationale to underpin the convergent temperature response in plant leaf respiration. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1538–1547 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gunderson, C. A., O’hara, K. H., Campion, C. M., Walker, A. V. & Edwards, N. T. Thermal plasticity of photosynthesis: the role of acclimation in forest responses to a warming climate. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2272–2286 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 1167–1179 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Slot, M. & Winter, K. In situ temperature relationships of biochemical and stomatal controls of photosynthesis in four lowland tropical tree species. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 3055–3068 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy, B. K. & Stinziano, J. R. A derivation error that affects carbon balance models exists in the current implementation of the modified Arrhenius function. New Phytol. 6, 2371–2381 (2021).

  40. Yan, W. & Hunt, L. A. An equation for modelling the temperature response of plants using only the cardinal temperatures. Ann. Bot. 84, 607–614 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Farquhar, G. D. & Busch, F. A. Changes in the chloroplastic CO2 concentration explain much of the observed Kok effect: a model. New Phytol. 214, 570–584 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Farquhar, G. D., Von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Duursma, R. A. Plantecophys – an R package for analysing and modelling leaf gas exchange data. PLoS ONE 10, e0143346 (2015).

  44. Bernacchi, C. J., Singsaas, E. L., Pimentel, C., Portis, A. R. Jr & Long, S. P. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 253–260 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. De Kauwe, M. G. et al. A test of the ‘one-point method’ for estimating maximum carboxylation capacity from field-measured, light-saturated photosynthesis. New Phytol. 210, 1130–1144 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bolker, B. M. & R. Core Team. bbmle: Tools for General Maximum Likelihood Estimation (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014).

  47. Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 261–304 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bolker, B. M. Ecological Models and Data in R (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).

  49. Venables, W. & Ripley, B. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Springer, 2002).

  50. Bytnerowicz, T. A. tbytnero/Bytnerowicz-Akana-Griffin-Menge-N-fix-Temp: Bytnerowicz_Akana_Griffin_Menge_2022_Nature_Plants https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5764790 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Tufts for assistance with the culture and preservation of bacteria, and the numerous friends at Columbia’s E3B department and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory who watered and fertilized plants. This publication was developed under STAR Fellowship Assistance Agreement no. FP91781501–0 awarded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to T.A.B. Support was given by the Stengl-Wyer Scholars Program awarded by the University of Texas at Austin to T.A.B., by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (no. DGE-2036197) to P.R.A. and by an NSF grant (no. DEB‐1457650) to D.N.L.M. This publication has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors, and EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.A.B., K.L.G. and D.N.L.M. conceived of the project. T.A.B. and P.R.A. collected data. T.A.B. conducted analyses and wrote the initial draft. All authors contributed to writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Bytnerowicz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Yingping Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary text, Tables 1–14 and Figs. 1–17.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bytnerowicz, T.A., Akana, P.R., Griffin, K.L. et al. Temperature sensitivity of woody nitrogen fixation across species and growing temperatures. Nat. Plants 8, 209–216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01090-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology