Abstract
Self-incompatibility (SI) is an important mechanism that prevents self-fertilization and inbreeding in flowering plants. The most widespread SI system utilizes S ribonucleases (S-RNases) and S-locus F-boxes (SLFs) as S determinants. In citrus, SI is ancestral, and Citrus maxima (pummelo) is self-incompatible, while Citrus reticulata (mandarin) and its hybrids are self-compatible (SC). Here, we identify nine highly polymorphic pistil-specific, developmentally expressed S-RNases from pummelo that segregate with S haplotypes in a gametophytic manner and cluster with authentic S-RNases. We provide evidence that these S-RNases function as the female S determinants in citrus. Moreover, we show that each S-RNase is linked to approximately nine SLFs. In an analysis of 117 citrus SLF and SFL-like (SLFL) genes, we reveal that they cluster into 12 types and that the S-RNases and intra-haplotypic SLF and SLFL genes co-evolved. Our data support the notion that citrus have a S locus comprising a S-RNase and several SLFs that fit the non-self-recognition model. We identify a predominant single nucleotide mutation, Sm-RNase, in SC citrus, which provides a ‘natural’ loss of function. We show that SI–SC transitions due to the Sm-RNase initially arose in mandarin, spreading to its hybrids and became fixed. Identification of an evolutionarily distant new genus utilizing the S-RNase-based SI system, >100 million years separated from the nearest S-RNase family, is a milestone for evolutionary comparative studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The RNA-seq data shown in Supplementary Table 3 (for pummelo and grapefruit) are available at NCBI BioProject ID under accession codes PRJNA526584 and PRJNA573625. The sequence data shown in Supplementary Table 7 of the pummelo S1-locus and S2-locus BAC clones are available at NCBI BioProject ID under accession codes PRJNA573817 and PRJNA573818, respectively. The DNA sequencing data shown in Supplementary Table 11 from the different citrus species are available at NCBI BioProject ID under accession codes PRJNA544805 (C. maxima), PRJNA544816 (C. aurantium), PRJNA544866 (C. paradisi), PRJNA544867 (C. limon) and PRJNA573624 (C. reticulata). The sequence data of the 15 citrus S-RNase genes are available at NCBI GenBank ID under accession codes MN652897, MN652898, MN652899, MN652900, MN652901, MN652902, MN652903, MN652904, MN652905, MN652906, MN652907, MN652908, MN652909, MN652910, MN652911 and MN652912. Any other raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
de Nettancourt, D. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants Vol. 3 (Springer, 2001).
Xue, Y., Carpenter, R., Dickinson, H. G. & Coen, E. S. Origin of allelic diversity in antirrhinum S locus RNases. Plant Cell 8, 805–814 (1996).
Sassa, H. et al. Self-incompatibility (S) alleles of the Rosaceae encode members of a distinct class of the T2/S ribonuclease superfamily. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 547–557 (1996).
McClure, B. A. et al. Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature 342, 955–957 (1989).
Takayama, S. & Isogai, A. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56, 467–489 (2005).
Kubo, K. et al. Collaborative non-self recognition system in S-RNase–based self-incompatibility. Science 330, 796–799 (2010).
Fujii, S., Kubo, K.-I. & Takayama, S. Non-self- and self-recognition models in plant self-incompatibility. Nat. Plants 2, 16130 (2016).
Ramanauskas, K. & Igić, B. The evolutionary history of plant T2/S-type ribonucleases. PeerJ 5, e3790 (2017).
Igić, B. & Kohn, J. R. Evolutionary relationships among self-incompatibility RNases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13167–13171 (2001).
Krajewski, A. J. & Rabe, E. Citrus flowering: a critical evaluation. J. Hortic. Sci. 70, 357–374 (1995).
Ngo, B. X., Wakana, A., Kim, J. H., Mori, T. & Sakai, K. Estimation of self-incompatibility S genotypes of Citrus cultivars and plants based on controlled pollination with restricted number of pollen grains. J. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ. 55, 67–72 (2010).
Ngo, B. X., Wakana, A., Park, S. M., Nada, Y. & Fukudome, I. Pollen tube behaviors in self-incompatible and self-compatible Citrus cultivars. J. Fac. Agr. Kyushu Univ. 45, 443–457 (2001).
Yamamoto, M., Kubo, T. & Tominaga, S. Self- and cross-incompatibility of various citrus accessions. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 75, 372–378 (2006).
Miller, A. J. & Gross, B. L. From forest to field: perennial fruit crop domestication. Am. J. Bot. 98, 1389–1414 (2011).
Zhang, S. et al. Reproduction in woody perennial Citrus: an update on nucellar embryony and self-incompatibility. Plant Reprod. 31, 43–57 (2018).
Hand, M. L. & Koltunow, A. M. G. The genetic gontrol of apomixis: asexual seed formation. Genetics 197, 441–450 (2014).
Soost, R. K. The incompatibility gene system in citrus. In Proc. First Int. Citrus Symp. (ed. Chapman, H.) 189–190 (Univ. California, Riverside, 1968).
Kim, J. H. et al. Determination of self-incompatible Citrus cultivars with S 1 and/or S 2 alleles by pollination with homozygous S1 seedlings (S 1S 1 or S 2S 2) of ‘Banpeiyu’ pummelo. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80, 404–413 (2011).
Miao, H., Ye, Z., Silva, J. A., Qin, Y. H. & Hu, G. Identifying differentially expressed genes in pollen from self-incompatible “Wuzishatangju” and self-compatible “Shatangju” mandarins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 8538–8555 (2013).
Liang, M. et al. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of S-RNase involved in the self-incompatibility of citrus. Mol. Genet. Genomics 292, 325–341 (2017).
Zhang, S. et al. Characterization of the ‘Xiangshui’ lemon transcriptome by de novo assembly to discover genes associated with self-incompatibility. Mol. Genet. Genomics 290, 365–375 (2015).
Castric, V. & Vekemans, X. Plant self-incompatibility in natural populations: a critical assessment of recent theoretical and empirical advances. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2873–2889 (2004).
Wright, S. The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations. Genetics 24, 538–552 (1939).
Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C. G. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 47–79 (2005).
Stone, J. L. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Q. Rev. Biol. 77, 17–32 (2002).
McClure, B., Cruz-García, F. & Romero, C. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Ann. Bot. 108, 647–658 (2011).
Franklin-Tong, V. E., Lawrence, M. J. & Franklin, F. C. H. An in vitro bioassay for the stigmatic product of the self-incompatibility gene in Papaver rhoeas L. New Phytol. 110, 109–118 (1988).
Franklin-Tong, V. E. in Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants: Evolution, Diversity, and Mechanisms (ed. Franklin-Tong, V. E.) 237–258 (Springer, 2008).
Kubo, K. et al. Gene duplication and genetic exchange drive the evolution of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility in Petunia. Nat. Plants 1, 14005 (2015).
Royo, J. et al. Loss of a histidine residue at the active site of S-locus ribonuclease is associated with self-compatibility in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6511–6514 (1994).
Sassa, H., Hirano, H., Nishio, T. & Koba, T. Style-specific self-compatible mutation caused by deletion of the S-RNase gene in Japanese pear (Pyrus serotina). Plant J. 12, 223–227 (1997).
Wang, X. et al. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat. Genet. 49, 765–772 (2017).
Yang, X. M. et al. Molecular phylogeography and population evolution analysis of Citrus ichangensis (Rutaceae). Tree Genet. Genomes https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1113-4 (2017).
Wu, G. A. et al. Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature 554, 311–316 (2018).
Nowak, M. D., Davis, A. P., Anthony, F. & Yoder, A. D. Expression and trans-specific polymorphism of self-incompatibility RNases in Coffea (Rubiaceae). PLoS ONE 6, e21019 (2011).
Asquini, E. et al. S-RNase-like sequences in styles of Coffea (Rubiaceae). Evidence for S-RNase based gametophytic self-incompatibility? Trop. Plant Biol. 4, 237–249 (2011).
Igić, B., Lande, R. & Kohn, J. R. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 93–104 (2008).
Li, M. et al. Genome structure and evolution of Antirrhinum majus L. Nat. Plants 5, 174–183 (2019).
Okada, K. et al. Deletion of a 236 kb region around S 4-RNase in a stylar-part mutant S 4sm-haplotype of Japanese pear. Plant Mol. Biol. 66, 389–400 (2008).
Golz, J. F., Clarke, A. E., Newbigin, E. & Anderson, M. A relic S-RNase is expressed in the styles of self-compatible Nicotiana sylvestris. Plant J. 16, 591–599 (1998).
Liu, Y., Liu, Q., Tao, N. & Deng, X. Efficient isolation of RNA from fruit peel and pulp of ripening navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). J. Huazhong Agr. Univ. 25, 300–304 (2006).
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–654 (2011).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).
Eddy, S. R. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 23, 205–211 (2009).
Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1, 18 (2012).
Kheyr-Pour, A. et al. Sexual plant reproduction sequence diversity of pistil S-proteins associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Sex. Plant Reprod. 3, 88–97 (1990).
Yang, J. et al. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 12, 7–8 (2015).
Chen, C., Xia, R., Chen, H. & He, Y. TBtools, a toolkit for biologists integrating various HTS-data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/289660v2 (2018).
Thorvaldsdottir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511–515 (2010).
Workenhe, S. T., Kibenge, M. J. T., Iwamoto, T. & Kibenge, F. S. B. Absolute quantitation of infectious salmon anaemia virus using different real-time reverse transcription PCR chemistries. J. Virol. Methods 154, 128–134 (2008).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452 (2009).
Hedges, S. B., Marin, J., Suleski, M., Paymer, M. & Kumar, S. Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 835–845 (2015).
Yen, Y. & Green, P. J. Identification and properties of the major ribonucleases of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 97, 1487–1493 (1991).
Besbes, F., Franz-Oberdorf, K. & Schwab, W. Phosphorylation-dependent ribonuclease activity of Fra a 1 proteins. J. Plant Physiol. 233, 1–11 (2019).
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classifcation for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 105–121 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to J. Wu from Nanjing Agricultural University for providing the sample of Pyrus bretschneideri. This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Programme of China (grant no. 2018YFD1000107), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31772259, 31630065 and 31521092), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 2662019PY044) and the China Agriculture Research System (grant no. CARS-27). The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) funds research in the laboratories of M.B. and V.E.F.-T. (grant no. BB/P005489/1). We would like to thank T. Li (China Agricultural University) and C. Franklin (School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK) for their valuable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.C., M.L. and V.E.F.-T. designed the experiments. M.L., Z.C., H.Y., Q.X.Jr and M.T. performed the experiments. J.L. completed the collection and sequencing of sour orange. M.L., A.Z., Y. Liu, Y. Li and R.X. analysed the bioinformatics data. S.W., C.C., Z.X. and C.D. collected the pummelo accessions. J.Y., W.G., Q.X., R.M.L., X.D., M.B. and L.C. were involved in the research design and improvement of the manuscript. M.L. and V.E.F.-T. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
All materials generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–24 and Tables 1–11.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, M., Cao, Z., Zhu, A. et al. Evolution of self-compatibility by a mutant Sm-RNase in citrus. Nat. Plants 6, 131–142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0597-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0597-3
This article is cited by
-
Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with self-(in)compatibility in goji berries (Lycium barbarum)
BMC Plant Biology (2024)
-
Ac-DEVD-CHO (caspase-3/DEVDase inhibitor) suppresses self-incompatibility–induced programmed cell death in the pollen tubes of petunia (Petunia hybrida E. Vilm.)
Cell Death Discovery (2024)
-
Comparative physiochemical and transcriptomic analysis reveals the influences of cross-pollination on ovary and fruit development in pummelo (Citrus maxima)
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
A toxin-antidote system contributes to interspecific reproductive isolation in rice
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Genetics Behind Sexual Incompatibility in Plants: How Much We Know and What More to Uncover?
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation (2023)