Trade-offs in clearing forests for rubber plantations depend on calculations of opportunity costs. Such costs are not just a matter of economic calculations but also the politics of the forests and those who live in them
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Assessing the contribution of mobility in the European Union to rubber expansion
Ambio Open Access 12 June 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Warren-Thomas, E. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 911 (2018).
Dove, M. R. The Banana Tree at the Gate: The History of Marginal Peoples and Global Markets in Borneo (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2011).
Penot, E., Chambon, B. & Wibawa, G. Proc. Internatl Rubber Conf. 497–532 (2017).
Yi, Z.-F. et al. Ecol. Indic. 36, 788–797 (2014).
Clough, Y. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 13137 (2016).
Li, H., Aide, T. M., Ma, Y., Liu, W. & Cao, M. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 1731–1745 (2007).
Zeng, L., Chatti, D., Hebdon, C. & Dove, M. R. Brown J. World Aff. 23, 159–176 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dove, M.R. Rubber versus forest on contested Asian land. Nature Plants 4, 321–322 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0169-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0169-y