Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy mildly increased after the publication of the AUA vasectomy guideline

International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study explored whether the publication of the vasectomy guideline by the American Urological Association in December 2012 increased the percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy. We used commercial health insurance claims between 2010 and 2015 to identify the initial sterilization counseling visit for men aged 18–64 and whether each of them received a vasectomy within six months of that visit. A difference-in-differences analysis isolated the effect of the guideline on the percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy, exploiting suspected variation in guideline exposure and adherence between urologists and non-urologists. In total, 226 012 men had an initial sterilization counseling visit, of which 182 204 (80.6%) were counseled by urologists and 43 808 (19.4%) were counseled by non-urologists. The percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy mildly increased by 1.5% (p = 0.002) after the publication of the guideline. Therefore, the percentage of men who receive a vasectomy may in part be explained by practice guidelines and clinicians’ willingness to consider the procedure, and future research should investigate how clinicians arrive at their decisions to recommend a vasectomy and whether a standardized counseling protocol would ensure consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Percentage of men counseled by urologists and non-urologists who received a vasectomy between 2010 and 2015.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Merative US LP but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.

Code availability

The code references data which are not publicly available, so it is not publicly available either.

References

  1. Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, Labrecque M, Marmar JL, Ross SL, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188:2482–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrowski KA, Holt SK, Haynes B, Davies BJ, Fuchs EF, Walsh TJ. Evaluation of vasectomy trends in the United States. Urology. 2018;118:76–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AUA Journals. Aims & Scopes for the Journal of Urology® [internet]. American Urological Association [Cited 2023 January 3]. Available from: American Urological Association (auajournals.org).

  4. Barone MA, Hutchinson PL, Johnson CH, Hsia J, Wheeler J. Vasectomy in the United States, 2002. J Urol. 2006;176:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro DD, Kamnetz SA, Le BV. Vasectomy practice patterns among family medicine physicians and compliance with the American Urological Association 2012 Vasectomy Guidelines. Urology. 2017;109:115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Posielski NM, Shapiro DD, Wang X, Le BV. Do I need to see a urologist for my vasectomy? A comparison of practice patterns between urologists and family medicine physicians. Asian J Androl. 2019;21:540–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Merative. Merative MarketScan Research Databases [internet]. Last revised June 2022. [Cited 2023 November 19]. Available from: https://www.merative.com/content/dam/merative/documents/brief/marketscan-explainer-general.pdf.

  8. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems [internet]. Last revised 2019 [Cited 2023 November 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases.

  9. Williams VF, Ying S, Stahlman S. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversals, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2000–2017. MSMR. 2019;26:11–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. United States® Census Bureau. Delineation Files [internet]. Last revised October 8, 2021. [Cited 2023 June 9]. Available from: Delineation Files (census.gov).

  11. ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus. Pregnancy at Age 35 Years or Older: ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus No. 11. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140:348’66.

  12. Karaca-Mandic P, Norton EC, Dowd B. Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:255–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Monheit AC, Cantor JC, DeLia D, Belloff D. How have state policies to expand dependent coverage affected the health insurance status of young adults? Health Serv Res. 2011;46:251–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol. 2010;184:2068–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312:2401–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, Xapata LB, Horton LG, Jamieson DJ, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Web of Science™. Citing Results: Citations of Vasectomy: AUA Guideline and 2013 or 2014 or 2015 (Publication Years) [internet]. Clarivate™ [Cited 2023 May 12]. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/cc07c9b8-1a7f-4938-b84d-c7d635fbc180-89919898/date-descending/1.

  18. Huang Z, Hyman MJ, Raheem OA. Trends in the vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18 to 64 in the United States between 2014 and 2021. Urology. 2023;179:80–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bole R, Lundy SD, Pei E, Bajic P, Parekh N, Vij SC. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2023;1-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x

  20. Kassab J, Campbell K, Lindsey J, Torres-Anguiano J, Khera M, Lipshultz L. An Increased Focus on Vasectomy: Overturn of Roe v. Wade Catalyzes Rise in the U.S. Vasectomy Requests. Fertil Steril 2023; Available from An Increased Focus on Vasectomy: Overturn of Roe v. Wade Catalyzes Rise in U.S. Vasectomy Requests (fertstert.org). Accessed Sep 21, 2023.

  21. Zhang TR, Able C, Ramasamy R, Kohn TP. United States vasectomy incidence rises after the reversal of Roe v. Wade in a national clinical and claims database. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:196–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy utilization in men aged 18–45 declined between 2002 and 2017: Results from the United States National Survey for Family Growth data. Andrology. 2022;10:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Punjani N, Goldstein M. Vasectomy: is the apparent decline real or not? Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:69–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. American Urological Association. The State of the Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States 2015 [internet]. American Urological Association; 2016 April 6 [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/research-and-data/aua-census/census-results.

  26. www.healthcare.gov/coverage/birth-control-benefits/ Healthcare.gov. Birth control benefits [internet]. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from

  27. Oregon Health Authority. Reproductive Health Equity Act [internet]. Oregon Health Authority; [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYPEOPLEFAMILIES/REPRODUCTIVESEXUALHEALTH/Pages/reproductive-health-equity-act.aspx

  28. Khan AI, Patil D, Kawwass JF, Zholudev V, Mehta A. Surgical sterilization among US men and women with employer-based insurance: A claims data analysis. Contraception. 2018;98:247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not every individual who is eligible for a vasectomy may identify as a man. We acknowledge that the term “men” does not reflect every gender identity. Certain data used in this study were supplied by Merative US LP as part of one or more MarketScan Research Databases. Any analysis, interpretation, or conclusion based on these data is solely that of the authors and not Merative. The overturning of Roe v. Wade refers to the issuance of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, NO 19-1392, 597 U. S. _ (2022). This research was internally funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Health and the Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Max J. Hyman

  2. Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Zhong Huang

  3. Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

    Omer A. Raheem

Authors
  1. Max J. Hyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omer A. Raheem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OR and MH proposed the study. MH and ZH designed the study. MH performed the statistical analysis. MH and ZH drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omer A. Raheem.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The University of Chicago Institutional Review Board exempted this study from full review because personal identifiable information was not available in these data.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyman, M.J., Huang, Z. & Raheem, O.A. The percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy mildly increased after the publication of the AUA vasectomy guideline. Int J Impot Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00829-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00829-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links