Attempts to “cure” erectile dysfunction (ED) are as old as recorded history. The history of penile prosthetic devices dates back over 500 years, when a French military surgeon designed the first known wooden prosthesis to support micturition. There have since been a great many technological advancements in penile prosthetics. Penile implants for the improvement of sexual function date to the twentieth century. Like all human endeavors, penile prosthesis innovations have progressed via trial and error. This review aims to provide an overview of penile prostheses for the treatment of ED since their introduction in 1936. More specifically, we aim to highlight important advances in penile prosthesis development and discuss dead ends that were abandoned. Highlights include two-piece inflatables, three-piece inflatables, and malleable/semirigid, along with modifications and updates to each basic design that improved both insertion and usability. Dead ends include innovative ideas that were lost to history due to a variety of factors. We also look to the future and discuss expected advances, including remotely activated devices and prostheses designed for special populations, including transgender men.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Gee WF. A history of surgical treatment of impotence. Urology. 1975;5:401–5.
Carson CCI, editor. Urologic prostheses: the complete practical guide to devices, their implantation, and patient follow up. 2002nd ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2001. p. 321.
Hakky TS, Wang R, Henry GD. The evolution of the inflatable penile prosthetic device and surgical innovations with anatomical considerations. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:410.
Schultheiss D, Gabouev AI, Jonas U. Nikolaj A. Bogoraz (1874-1952): pioneer of phalloplasty and penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2005;2:139–46.
Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis. New implant for management of impotence. Urology. 1975;5:479–86.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.
Finney RP. New hinged silicone penile implant. J Urol. 1977;118:585–7.
Jonas U, Jacobi GH. Silicone-silver penile prosthesis: description, operative approach and results. J Urol. 1980;123:865–7.
Merrill DC. Mentor inflatable penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am. 1989;16:51–66.
Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1989;141:58–9.
Anafarta K, Yaman O, Aydos K. Clinical experience with Dynaflex penile prostheses in 120 patients. Urology. 1998;52:1098–100.
Stanisic TH, Dean JC, Donovan JM, Beutler LE. Clinical experience with a self-contained inflatable penile implant: the Flexi-Flate. J Urol. 1988;139:947–50.
Mulcahy JJ. The development of modern penile implants. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:177–89.
Dorflinger T, Bruskewitz R. AMS malleable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1986;28:480–5.
Fein RL. The G.F.S. Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;147:66–8.
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–7.
Levinson K, Whitehead ED. OmniPhase penile prosthesis: delayed bilateral central cable breakage. J Urol. 1989;141:618–9.
Mulcahy JJ, Krane RJ, Lloyd LK, Edson M, Siroky MB. Duraphase penile prosthesis-results of clinical trials in 63 patients. J Urol. 1990;143:518–9.
Khera M, Mulcahy J, Wen L, Wilson SK. Is there still a place for malleable penile implants in the United States? Wilson’s Workshop #18. Int J Impot Res. 2020;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00376-6.
Barnard JT, Grimaud L, Yafi FA. Does Medicaid cover penile prosthesis surgery? A state-by-state analysis. J Sex Med. 2021;18:1455–60.
Quesada-Olarte J, Nelwan D, Donato U, Fernandez-Crespo R, Parker J, Carrion RE. Penile implant instrument innovations. Curr Urol Rep. 2023;24:59–67.
Eid JF. No-touch technique. J Sex Med. 2011;8:5–8.
Wolter CE, Hellstrom WJG. The hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis: 1-year experience. J Sex Med. 2004;1:221–4.
Carson CC. Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol. 2004;171:1611–4.
Falcone M, Garaffa G, Gillo A, Dente D, Christopher AN, Ralph DJ. Outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in 247 patients completing female to male gender reassignment surgery. BJU Int. 2018;121:139–44.
van der Sluis WB, Pigot GLS, Al-Tamimi M, Ronkes BL, de Haseth KB, Özer M, et al. A retrospective cohort study on surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation surgery in transgender men after phalloplasty. Urology. 2019;132:195–201.
Pigot GLS, Sigurjónsson H, Ronkes B, Al-Tamimi M, van der Sluis WB. Surgical experience and outcomes of implantation of the ZSI 100 FtM malleable penile implant in transgender men after phalloplasty. J Sex Med. 2020;17:152–8.
Gon LM, de Campos CCC, Voris BRI, Passeri LA, Fregonesi A, Riccetto CLZ. A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role. BMC Urol. 2021;21:1–8.
Tienforti D, Totaro M, Spagnolo L, Di Giulio F, Castellini C, Felzani G, et al. Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence. Int J Impot Res. 2022;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00632-x.
Pang KH, Muneer A, Alnajjar HM. A systematic review of penile prosthesis insertion in patients with spinal cord injury. Sex Med Rev. 2022;10:468–77.
Krughoff K, Bearelly P, Apoj M, Munarriz NA, Thirumavalavan N, Pan S, et al. Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:86–92.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Soliman T, Nassar M, Mekawi Z, et al. Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection. BJU Int. 2018;121:293–300.
Hakim LS, Kulaksizoglu H, Hamill BK, Udelson D, Goldstein I. A guide to safe corporotomy incisions in the presence of underlying inflatable penile cylinders: results of in vitro and in vivo studies. J Urol. 1996;155:918–23.
Chung E. Penile prosthesis implant in the special populations: diabetics, neurogenic conditions, fibrotic cases, concurrent urinary continence surgery, and salvage implants. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:39–44.
Robles-Torres JI, Gómez-Guerra L, Ramos-Cuevas D, Sánchez-Uresti A, Gutiérrez-González A. Pd40-04 semiautomatic inflatable electronic penile implant prototype. J Urol. 2018;199:e804–5.
Le BV, McVary KT, McKenna K, Colombo A. Use of magnetic induction to activate a “touchless” shape memory alloy implantable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2019;16:596–601.
MSG and JJM are consultants/speakers for Coloplast. JJM is a consultant/speaker for Boston Scientific. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
May, E., Hanley, M., Mulcahy, J.J. et al. Technological advances in penile implants: past, present, future. Int J Impot Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00689-2
This article is cited by
Perspective on 1st International Symposium Advanced Genitourinary Reconstruction & Urologic Prosthesis course at the University of Chicago Medical Center
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)