Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction: a literature review

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 35, pages 519–522 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Larger penis size has been associated with a sign of strength, masculinity, and social standing. Little study has examined the relationship between men’s penis size and their partners’ sexual satisfaction. The purpose of the present study was to detail and evaluate the effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction with a design of narrative literature review. A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed was conducted to discover relevant studies on this issue. Currently, available studies show incomplete results between the penis size and partners’ sexual satisfaction and are limited by methodological drawbacks, including small sample’s size. The link between penis size and the sexual satisfaction of the partner need to be supported by more robust scientific evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (SW) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Lee PA. Survey report: concept of penis size. J Sex Marital Ther. 1996;22:131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharp G, Oates J. Sociocultural influences on men’s penis size perceptions and decisions to undergo penile augmentation: a qualitative study. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39:1253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veale D, Eshkevari E, Read J, Miles S, Troglia A, Phillips R, et al. Beliefs about penis size: validation of a scale for men ashamed about their penis size. J Sex Med. 2014;11:84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manfredi C, Romero Otero J, Djinovic R. Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veale D, Vaidya A, Papageorgiou A, Foks M, Giona S, Hodsoll J, et al. A preliminary investigation of a novel method to manipulate penis length to measure female sexual satisfaction: a single-case experimental design. BJU Int. 2021;128:374–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lever J, Frederick DA, Peplau LA. Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan. Psychol Men Masc. 2006;7:129–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bettocchi C, Checchia AA, Falagario UG, Ricapito A, Busetto GM, Cormio L, et al. Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:392–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson SK, Picazo AL. Update on the Penuma® an FDA-cleared penile implant for aesthetic enhancement of the flaccid penis. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruppen-Greeff NK, Weber DM, Gobet R, Landolt MA. What is a good looking penis? How women rate the penile appearance of men with surgically corrected hypospadias. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1737–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mautz BS, Wong BB, Peters RA, Jennions MD. Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:6925–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. 1966.

  12. Masters WH, Masters VJ. Human sexual inadequacy. Bantam Books; 1980.

  13. Fisher WA, Branscombe NR, Lemery CR. The bigger the better? Arousal and attributional responses to erotic stimuli that depict different size penises. J Sex Res. 1983;19:377–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002;415:429–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prause N, Park J, Leung S, Miller G. Women’s preferences for penis size: a new research method using selection among 3D models. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stulhofer A. How (un)important is penis size for women with heterosexual experience? Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenman R. Penis size: Survey of female perceptions of sexual satisfaction. BMC Women’s Health. 2001;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Francken AB, van de Wiel HB, van Driel MF, Weijmar Schultz WC. What importance do women attribute to the size of the penis? Eur Urol. 2002;42:426–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaeer O, Shaeer K, Shaeer E. The Global Online Sexuality Survey (GOSS): female sexual dysfunction among Internet users in the reproductive age group in the Middle East. J Sex Med. 2012;9:411–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Bishop PJ, Parish A. Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:798–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li B, Anderson MJ. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Morgan B, Anderson MJ. Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brody S, Weiss P. Vaginal orgasm is associated with vaginal (not clitoral) sex education, focusing mental attention on vaginal sensations, intercourse duration, and a preference for a longer penis. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2774–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lehman P. Running scared: masculinity and the representation of the male body. Wayne State University Press; 2007.

  25. Califano G, Arcaniolo D, Ruvolo CC, Manfredi C, Smarrazzo F, Cilio S, et al. Glans penis augmentation: when, how, and why? Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:343–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. García Gómez B, Alonso Isa M, García Rojo E, Fiorillo A, Romero Otero J. Penile length augmentation surgical and non-surgical approaches for aesthetical purposes. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:332–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller G. The mating mind: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Anchor; 2011.

  28. Levin RJ. The human female orgasm: a critical evaluation of its proposed reproductive functions. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2011;26:301–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jannini EA, Rubio-Casillas A, Whipple B, Buisson O, Komisaruk BR, Brody S. Female orgasm(s): one, two, several. J Sex Med. 2012;9:956–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jannini EA, Buisson O, Rubio-Casillas A. Beyond the G-spot: clitourethrovaginal complex anatomy in female orgasm. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brody S, Costa RM. Vaginal orgasm is more prevalent among women with a prominent tubercle of the upper lip. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2793–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa RM, Miller GF, Brody S. Women who prefer longer penises are more likely to have vaginal orgasms (but not clitoral orgasms): implications for an evolutionary theory of vaginal orgasm. J Sex Med. 2012;9:3079–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buisson O. Le point G ou l’absence de médecine sexuelle féminine. Gynécol Obstétrique Fertilé. 2010;12:781–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Puppo V. Embryology and anatomy of the vulva: the female orgasm and women’s sexual health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Puppo V, Puppo G. Anatomy of sex: revision of the new anatomical terms used for the clitoris and the female orgasm by sexologists. Clin Anat. 2015;28:293–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puppo V. Anatomy and physiology of the clitoris, vestibular bulbs, and labia minora with a review of the female orgasm and the prevention of female sexual dysfunction. Clin Anat. 2013;26:134–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hensel DJ, von Hippel CD, Lapage CC, Perkins RH. Women’s techniques for making vaginal penetration more pleasurable: results from a nationally representative study of adult women in the United States. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0249242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wylie KR. Adjusting penis length and the potential impact on female sexual satisfaction. BJU Int. 2021;128:267–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Breyer BN, Smith JF, Eisenberg ML, Ando KA, Rowen TS, Shindel AW. The impact of sexual orientation on sexuality and sexual practices in North American medical students. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2391–400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Drummond M, Filiault S. The long and the short of it: gay men’s perception of penis size. Gay Lesbian Issues Psychol Rev. 2007;3:121–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandez-Crespo RE, Cordon-Galiano BH. Sexual dysfunction among men who have sex with men: a review article. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. La J, Loeb CA, Barham DW, Miller J, Chung E, Gross MS, et al. Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00603-2.

  43. Grov C, Parsons JT, Bimbi DS. The association between penis size and sexual health among men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:788–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brennan J. Size matters: penis size and sexual position in gay porn profiles. J Homosex. 2018;65:912–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beren SE, Hayden HA, Wilfley DE, Grilo CM. The influence of sexual orientation on body dissatisfaction in adult men and women. Int J Eat Disord. 1996;20:135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tiggemann M, Martins Y, Churchett L. Beyond muscles: unexplored parts of men’s body image. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:1163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sandfort TG, de Keizer M. Sexual problems in gay men: an overview of empirical research. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2001;12:93–120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Grabski B, Kasparek K. Sexual problems in homo- and bisexual men—the context of the issue. Psychiatr Pol. 2017;51:75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Resident in Urology, Brussels, Belgium

    Shirley Loos

  2. Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Jean, Brussels, Belgium

    Peter De Wil, Leslie Delcarte & Sam Ward

  3. Department of Urology, Biruni University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ege Can Serefoglu

  4. Department of Urology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium

    Koenraad Van Renterghem

Authors
  1. Shirley Loos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter De Wil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leslie Delcarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ege Can Serefoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koenraad Van Renterghem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sam Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SL: Investigation, conceptualization, resources, writing-original draft preparation; PDW: Investigation, resources, writing-original draft preparation; LD: Writing-review&editing, methodology, ECS: conceptualization, writing-review&editing, supervision; KVR: Supervision; SW: conceptualization, resources, writing-original draft preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Ward.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loos, S., De Wil, P., Delcarte, L. et al. The effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction: a literature review. Int J Impot Res 35, 519–522 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00636-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00636-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links