Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 6-item female sexual function index (FSFI-6) and the relationship between climacturia and female sexual dysfunction

Abstract

This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the FSFI-6 questionnaire,an abbreviated version of FSFI-19,a common tool for evaluating female sexual function. The study included 120 female patients aged between 18–65 years who presented to the urology clinic between December 2019 and March 2020. The Turkish version of FSFI-6 was translated from the English version for validation. The abridged FSFI-6 questionnaire consists of questions 2, 4, 7, 11, 16, and 17 of the FSFI-19 form. We recorded the demographic data of the patients. All subjects filled out the FSFI-19 and FSFI-6 questionnaires. The patients were asked to fill out the questionnaires again after two weeks. The mean age of the subjects was 46.58 ± 9.89 years (28–63). The results of the reliability analysis indicated that the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total FSFI-6 score was 0.92 (weighted kappa coefficients of individual items, 0.868–0.975) and the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.862. The validity analysis indicated that the mean total FSFI-6 score was strongly correlated with the mean FSFI-19 score (p < 0.001, r = 0.997). In the test-retest analysis,the kappa coefficient was calculated as 0.891. The FSFI-19 and FSFI-6 scores of the patients with (n = 52) and without climacturia (n = 68) were compared, and it was observed that the scores of the patients with climacturia were significantly lower than those without climacturia (p < 0.001). The abbreviated FSFI-6 questionnaire is a valuable tool for screening women with FSD. It can be used more extensively due to being short and easy to apply. Our results approve the Turkish version of the questionnaire as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating FSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palacios S, Castaño R, Grazziotin A. Epidemiology of female sexual dysfunction. Maturitas.2009;63:119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen RC, Taylor JF, Leiblum SR, Bachmann GA. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women: results of a survey study of 329 women in an outpatient gynecological clinic. J Sex Marital Ther. 1993;19:171–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blümel JE, Chedraui P, Baron G, Belzares E, Bencosme A, Calle A, et al. Sexual dysfunction in middle-aged women: a multicenter Latin American study using the Female Sexual Function Index. Menopause.2009;16:1139–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayes RD, Dennerstein L, Bennett CM, Fairley CK. What is the “true” prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact? J Sex Med. 2008;5:777–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corona G, Jannini EA, Maggi M. Inventories for male and female sexual dysfunctions. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:236–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Learman LA, Huang AJ, Nakagawa S, Gregorich SE, Kuppermann M. Development and validation of a sexual functioning measure for use in diverse women’s health outcome studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:710.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham L, Symonds T, May K, Althof SE, Hallam-Jones R, Rosen RC. Psychometric validation of gender nonspecific sexual confidence and sexual relationship scales in men and women. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2244–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nappi RE, Albani F, Vaccaro P, Gardella B, Salonia A, Chiovato L, et al. Use of the Italian translation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in routine gynecological practice. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008;24:214–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aygin D, Aslan F. The Turkish adaptation of the Female Sexual Function Index. Turkiye Klinikleri. J Med Sci. 2005;25:393–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isidori AM, Pozza C, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Morano S, Vignozzi L, et al. Development and validation of a 6-item version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) as a diagnostic tool for female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Turunc T, Deveci S, Güvel S, Peşkircioǧlu L. The assessment of Turkish validation with 5 question version of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Turk Urol Derg. 2007;33:45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson M, Lalos O, Lindkvist H, Lalos A. Impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on women’s and their partners’ sexual life. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendez MH, Sexton SJ, Lentz AC. Contemporary review of male and female climacturia and urinary leakage during sexual activities. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam GW, Foldspang A, Elving LB, Mommsen S. Social context, social abstention, and problem recognition correlated with adult female urinary incontinence. Dan Med Bull. 1992;39:565–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Doğan K, Vural M, Akyüz F. Evaluation of effects of urinary incontinence subtypes on women’s sexual function using the Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:551–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Armeni A, Salazar-Pousada D, Andrade-Ponce S, Tupacyupanqui-Mera J, Perez-Lopez F, Chedraui P. Reliability and validity of FSFI-6 in mid-aged Ecuadorian women. Maturitas.2017;103:93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez-López FR, Fernández-Alonso AM, Trabalón-Pastor M, Vara C, Chedraui P. Assessment of sexual function and related factors in mid-aged sexually active Spanish women with the six-item Female Sex Function Index. Menopause.2012;19:1224–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monterrosa Castro A, Perez-Lopez F, Ornat L. Sexual function assessment with the 6-item FSFI in postmenopausal Colombian women. Maturitas.2015;81:202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee Y, Lim MC, Joo J, Park K, Lee S, Seo S, et al. Development and validation of the Korean version of the Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6K). Yonsei Med J. 2014;55:1442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pimenta F, Albergaria R, Gomes M, Maroco J, Leal I, Chedraui P, et al. Preliminary validating analysis of the Portuguese language 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6). Maturitas.2017;100:143–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dall’Agno ML, Ferreira CF, Ferreira FV, Pérez-López FR, Wender MCO. Validation of the six-item female sexual function index in middle-aged Brazilian women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41:432–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geiss IM, Umek WH, Dungl A, Sam C, Riss P, Hanzal E. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in gynecologic and urogynecologic patients according to the international consensus classification. Urology.2003;62:514–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Derogatis LR, Burnett AL. The epidemiology of sexual dysfunctions. J Sex Med. 2008;5:289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitive and emotional predictors of female sexual dysfunctions: preliminary findings. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34:325–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mollaioli D, Di Sante S, Limoncin E, Ciocca G, Gravina GL, Maseroli E, et al. Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AES: Project development, data collection, paper writing. MGC: Project development, paper writing. EJ: Supervisor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Gokhan Culha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonbahar, A.E., Culha, M.G. & Jannini, E. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 6-item female sexual function index (FSFI-6) and the relationship between climacturia and female sexual dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 34, 610–613 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00463-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00463-2

Search

Quick links