The history of the development of today’s very dependable three-piece inflatable penile prostheses is fascinating. In its infancy, the three piece was plagued with frequent revisions and a relatively complex insertion and consequently unitary and two-piece prostheses flourished with the implanting urologists. While the surgery was less difficult because these devices did not require the dreaded reservoir insertion, they often proved unsatisfactory to patients in flaccidity, erection and longevity. By the turn of this century all of the unitary and two-piece inflatables had been withdrawn from the market except the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. This paper covers the history of the various unitary and 2-piece inflatable models before examining a critical question: is the Ambicor 2-piece still a needed implant today?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $14.88 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Experience with the Hydroflex penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1989;41:58–60.
Anafarta K, Yaman O, Aydos K. Clinical experience with the Dynaflex penile prosthesis in 120 patients. Urology. 1998;52:1098–2.
Oberlin DT, Matuewicz RS, Bachrach L, Hofer MD, Brannigan RE, Flurry SC. National practice patterns of treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Urol. 2015;193:2040–4.
Stanisic TH, Dean JC, Donovan JM, Beutler LE. Clinical experience with a self-contained penile implant: the Flexiflate. J Urol. 1988;139:947–50.
Fein RL. The GFS Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;147:66–9.
George VK, Erkhan S, Dhabuwala CB. Follow-up with mentor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Int J Impot Res. 1995;7:17–21.
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability, safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2-center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–8.
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9.
Richardson B, Caire A, Hellstrom WJ. Retrospective long-term analysis of titan hydrophilic coating: positive reduction of infection compared to non-coated device. J Sex Med. 2010;7:28–30.
Mandava H, Serefoglu EC, Freier MT, Wilson SK, Helstrom WJG. Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012;188:1855–6.
Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007;177:262–6.
Oliver SK, Bennett NE. Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis; background and contemporary outcomes. Sex Med Rev. 2018;2:319–27.
Wilson SK. Pearls perils and pitfalls of prosthetic urology. Fort Smith AR: Calvert McBride; 2008.
Welliver RC, Fonseca AN, West BL, McVary KT, Köhler TS. Autoinflation leading to failure of two-piece Ambicor implantable penile prosthesis: an outcome from a methodical treatment of recalcitrant stuttering priapism. Case Rep Urol. 2014;2014:529037.
Henry GD, Karpman E, Brant W, Christine B, Kansas BT, Khera M, et al. The who, how, and what of real-world penile implants patients in 2015: the propper (prospective registry of outcomes with penile prosthesis for erectile restoration) registry baseline data. J Urol. 2016;195:427–33.
Conflict of interest
JJM Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast. AT: Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Endo. LW: none. SKW: Consultant AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices, Uramix. Lecturer Boston Scientific.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Mulcahy, J.J., Tatem, A., Wen, L. et al. The last survivor of unitary and two-piece inflatables—the Ambicor. Does it still have a role in today’s implant marketplace?. Int J Impot Res 34, 511–519 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00367-7