This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $14.88 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Pedziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Kisielewski M, Major P, Mydlowska A, Rubinkiewicz M, et al. ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short term outcomes? Med Oncol. 2016;33:56.
Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F. Long term recurrence and complications associated with elective hernia repair. JAMA. 2016;316:1575–82.
van Renterghem K. Lessons learned from 25 years of prosthetic surgery. J Vis Surg. 2019;5:73–73.
Pak JS, Silva M, Deibert CM, Cooper K, Badalato G. Male urethral, penile and incontinence surgery: is resident exposure adequate? Urology. 2015;86:868–72.
Nakagawa S, Fischkoff K, Berlin A, Amell T, Blinderman C. Communication skills for general surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:1223–30.
Mota P, Carvalho N, Carvalho-Dias E, Joao Costa M, Correia Pinto J, Lima E. Video-based surgical learning: Improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:828–35.
Ghazi A, Campbell T, Melnyk R, Fenq C, Andrusco A, Stone J, et al. Validation of a full-immersion simulation platform for percutaneous nephrolithotomy using three-dimensional printing technology. J Endourol. 2017;31:1314–20.
Cacciamani GE, Okhunov Z, Meneses AD, Rodrigues Socarras M, Rivas J, Porpiglia F, et al. Impact of three-dimensional printing in urology: state of the art and future perspectives. A systematic review by ESUT-YAUWP group. Eur Urol. 2019;76:209–21.
Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, Autorino R, Manfredi M, Iannizzi G, et al. Current use of three-dimensional model technology in urology: A road map for personalized surgical planning. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4:652–6.
Shee K, Koo K, Wu X, Ghali F, Halter R, Hyams E. A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis. J Robot Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00926-1. [Epub ahead of print]
Alshomer F, AlFaqeeh F, Alariefy, Altweijiri I, Alhumsi T. Low-cost desktop-based three-dimensional-printed patient-specific craniofacial models in surgical counseling, consent taking and education of parent of craniosynostosis patients: A comparison with conventional visual explanation modalities. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:1652–6.
Lentz A, Rodriguez D, Davis L, Apoj M, Kerfoot B, Perito P, et al. Simulation training in penile implant surgery: Assessment of surgical confidence and knowledge with cadaveric laboratory training. Sex Med. 2018;6:332–8.
Kim SC, Fisher JG, Delman KA, Hinman JM, Srinivasan JK. Cadaver-based simulation increased resident confidence, initial exposure to fundamental techniques and may augment operative autonomy. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:e33–e41.
Ahmed K, Aydin A, Dasgupta, Khan M, McCabe J. A novel cadaveric simulation program in urology. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:556–65.
Mahmood O, Dagnaes J, Bube S, Rohrsted M, Konge L. Nonspecialist raters can provide reliable assessments of procedural skills. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:370–6.
This surgical education program is an ESSM (European Society for Sexual Medicin) initiative designed and developed within the scientific board of ESSM. The certicate that will follow after completing this Surgical Academy will be given by ESSM.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
van Renterghem, K., Ghazi, A. Surgical education in the 21st century: implications for sexual medicine. Int J Impot Res 32, 544–546 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0218-8