Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Yersinia pestis and plague: an updated view on evolution, virulence determinants, immune subversion, vaccination, and diagnostics


Plague is a vector-borne disease caused by Yersinia pestis. Transmitted by fleas from rodent reservoirs, Y. pestis emerged <6000 years ago from an enteric bacterial ancestor through events of gene gain and genome reduction. It is a highly remarkable model for the understanding of pathogenic bacteria evolution, and a major concern for public health as highlighted by recent human outbreaks. A complex set of virulence determinants, including the Yersinia outer-membrane proteins (Yops), the broad-range protease Pla, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and iron capture systems play critical roles in the molecular strategies that Y. pestis employs to subvert the human immune system, allowing unrestricted bacterial replication in lymph nodes (bubonic plague) and in lungs (pneumonic plague). Some of these immunogenic proteins as well as the capsular antigen F1 are exploited for diagnostic purposes, which are critical in the context of the rapid onset of death in the absence of antibiotic treatment (less than a week for bubonic plague and <48 h for pneumonic plague). Here, we review recent research advances on Y. pestis evolution, virulence factor function, bacterial strategies to subvert mammalian innate immune responses, vaccination, and problems associated with pneumonic plague diagnosis.


Plague is a vector-borne illness transmitted by fleas to a variety of wildlife rodents, which represent natural reservoirs for the disease in a wide range of habitats around the world [1]. The etiological agent of plague is the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia pestis [2], discovered by the Institut Pasteur, bacteriologist Alexandre Yersin during a plague outbreak in Hong Kong in 1894 [3]. Plague has impacted the history of humankind through several pandemics that have initially spread from Central Asia to Africa and Europe, and plague has reached every continent during the last 150 years [4]. In the 21st century, plague is present in Asia, Africa and America [5], and recent outbreaks in Uganda [6], China [7], Democratic Republic of Congo [8], and Madagascar [9, 10] remind that plague is still a major public health concern.

Y. pestis is highly similar on a genomic level to the enteric pathogen Y. pseudotuberculosis; however, a series of gene gain and gene loss events have led to the appearance of markedly different mechanisms of disease as well as niche preference and lifestyle [11]. Y. pestis displays a quite unique set of virulence factors that allow successful infection of fleas and subversion of immune responses in mammalian hosts, leading to rapid host death in the absence of adequate treatment. In this article, we review recent advances in plague research, particularly in the fields of evolution, virulence determinants, and subversion of mammalian immune responses, as well as an overview of the critical aspects of vaccination and pneumonic plague diagnosis. For other aspects of Y. pestis infection, such as Y. pestis adaptation to the flea, see, e.g., the review by Hinnebusch et al. [12].

Emergence and evolution of Yersinia pestis

Insights into Y. pestis phylogeny are emerging from ancient DNA (aDNA) paleo-genomic studies, which have been positively impacted by the development of high-throughput, “next-generation” DNA sequencing (NGS) technologies, together with an impressive decline in sequencing costs. The recovery of Y. pestis DNA from the teeth of prehistoric individuals has uncovered the branching of independent lineages throughout Eurasia in the Neolithic, and allowed to accurately estimate that Y. pestis diverged from Y. pseudotuberculosis around 5700–6000 years ago (ya) [13,14,15,16]. This emergence was characterized by the acquisition of the two virulence-associated plasmids pFra/pMT1 and pPla/pPCP1 and by the inactivation (promoter mutation) of the virulence-associated gene pde3 [15, 17].

Whole-genome-based phylogenies have defined a five-branch population structure for Y. pestis [18], following the previously described nomenclatures that termed the lineages according to their phylogenetic branch (0–4) plus the biovar abbreviation: ANT (biovar Antiqua), MED (Medievalis), ORI (Orientalis), IN (Intermediate), and PE (Pestoides, including Microtus isolates). An early divergence event occurred between 5000 and 5700 ya, giving origin to the most basal Y. pestis lineages persisting today (0.PE7 and 0.PE2), and to two extinct Neolithic and Bronze Age lineages (Gok2 and LNBA, respectively) [14]. These latter ones appeared to have functional variants of the virulence-associated genes ureD, rcsA, flhD, and pde2 as well as to lack the Yersinia murine toxin encoded by the ymt gene (Fig. 1). The acquisition of ymt [17] and inactivation of ureD, rcsA, flhD, pde2, and pde3 critically contributed to the transmissibility of Y. pestis by fleas [19]. Interestingly, the plasminogen activator Pla, a key virulence factor responsible for the fulminant lung infection specific of Y. pestis, was carried by Gok2, LNBA, 0.PE2, and 0.PE7 lineages in its ancestral form (I259), which has been associated with reduced bacterial dissemination in mammals [20]. This suggests that these strains may have had a limited flea-borne transmissibility and a reduced invasiveness within the host [13, 15].

Fig. 1

Yersinia pestis phylogenetic tree. Schematic representation of the Y. pestis genealogy, including previously described phylogenetic branches (0–4) and biovars (ANT: Antiqua, MED: Medievalis, ORI: Orientalis, IN: Intermediate, PE: Pestoides, including Microtus isolates), as well as six novel Pestoides clusters [25]. The length of the branches does not reflect the evolutionary time. Nodes from branch 3, branch 2 and branch 1.IN were collapsed for simplicity. The node indicated as an asterisk marks the polytomy known as the «Big Bang», which gave rise to branches 1–4. The three historically recorded plague pandemics are presented in bold next to their associated phylogenetic lineages. The key gene gain and inactivation events in the evolution of Y. pestis from Y. pseudotuberculosis are displayed. These events include the acquisition of two virulence-associated plasmids (pFra/pMT1 and pPla/pPCP1), the gain of Yersinia murine toxin (ymt) in the pFra/pMT1 plasmid, as well as by the inactivation of the virulence-associated genes pde3 (1promoter mutation; 2inactivating mutation), ureD, rcsA, flhD, and pde2. The aftermath of these molecular changes gave rise to the Y. pestis’ flea-borne transmission and thereby the ability to cause bubonic plague. The acquisition of the I259T mutation in the plasminogen activator (Pla), a key virulence factor responsible for the fulminant lung infection specific of Y. pestis, is also presented in the phylogeny

A second expansion event around 4000 ya gave rise to an extinct Bronze Age lineage (RT5) and to lineages persisting to the present day: 0.PE4 (microtus) and the diverse lineages that led to all known plague pandemics [16]. The ancestor in this polytomy incorporated ymt and had the derived, inactive forms of ureD, rcsA, flhD, and pde2, suggesting that the flea-mediated transmission mechanism causing bubonic plague evolved as early as 5000 ya [16]. The frequent presence of Y. pestis among Neolithic human remains indicates that this pathogen was prevalent and virulent, hypothesizing the existence of prehistoric plague pandemics [14]. Several models for early plague dispersion have been proposed [13, 14, 16], although the exact birthplace of the successful Y. pestis lineage that led to the historically recorded pandemics remains unclear.

Paleo-genomic studies also provided unambiguous evidence confirming the presence of Y. pestis in two historically recorded plague pandemics: the Justinian’s Plague (6–8th centuries) [21, 22] and the second plague pandemic (14–18th centuries) including the infamous Black Death [23, 24]. The phylogenetic reconstruction of Justinian’s Plague aDNA revealed novel, extinct Justinian lineages (0.ANT4 and 0.ANT5) that branched between current 0.ANT1 and 0.ANT2 lineages, inaugurating independent lineages from strains associated with subsequent pandemics [22]. The wide distribution of 0.ANT strains (0.ANT3 and the newly found 0.ANT5 population) within the high-mountain foci from Kyrgyzstan suggests a Central Asian origin for the Justinian’s Plague pandemic [25]. In contrast to the first plague pandemic genomes, all recovered Black Death strains cluster at the root of branch 1, near a big bang polytomy that gave rise to most of the extant strain diversity [18, 26], including the lineages responsible for the Modern plague pandemic [22].

Several scenarios have been proposed to explain the transmission dynamics and persistence of plague in Europe after its introduction from Central/Eastern Asia during the Black Death. Initial paleo-genomic analyses using medieval Y. pestis genomes suggested that different bacterial clones were responsible for the second pandemic [24], proposing that plague was repeatedly introduced in Western Europe from reservoirs located in Eastern Europe/Central Asia [27] and spread via commercial trade routes and human migrations [28]. Other studies have found limited Y. pestis diversity during the second pandemic and propose a different scenario, in which plague may have established in natural rodent-based foci within Europe that evolved and persisted until the 18th century, spreading eastward back to Central and East Asia to become the source of the contemporary epidemics [29, 30]. A recent study combining historical, archeological, and genomic data has reevaluated all previously published Medieval strains together with five novel Y. pestis genomes, and infers different waves of introduction of plague to Western Europe during medieval times [26]. Both long-term persistence together with multiple introductions might have shaped the dynamics of plague during the second pandemic [31], which could have also been transmitted by vectors that were different from those of rodents, such as human ectoparasites [32].

The third pandemic originated around 1855 in the Chinese province of Yunnan with the emergence of the biovar Orientalis strains, which belong to the 1.ORI branch. From this origin, plague spread worldwide via steamships carrying infected rats and is nowadays present in Asia, Africa, and America [4]. The transmission dynamics in the third pandemic were characterized by single introduction events, followed by a rapid expansion and settlement in local rodent reservoirs, which allowed a rodent–flea–rodent transmission cycle. This combination seems essential for plague establishment in newly colonized countries. For instance, this scenario took place with the introduction of plague in Brazil through the seaport of Santos, Sao Paulo in 1899 or in Toamasina, the main seaport of Madagascar, in 1898. Local settlement and expansion explain the observed diversity in the different 1.ORI lineages (1.ORI1, 1.ORI2, and 1.ORI3), each one representing a large wave of Y. pestis spread [4, 33,34,35]. The characterization of strains from extant natural plague foci has also contributed to sketch the historical transmission and the genealogy of Y. pestis. In light of the recent genotyping of 359 modern Y. pestis strains from the natural plague foci in the former Soviet Union countries, an update of the intraspecific taxonomy was proposed [25] (Fig. 1). This new population structure defined seven subspecies: the ssp. pestis, which includes the vast majority of virulent lineages that participated in the historically recorded pandemics (ANT, MED, ORI, and possibly, IN too); as well as six other clusters, including ssp. caucasica—0.PE2, ssp. angolica—0.PE3, ssp. central asiatica—0.PE4, spp. tibetica—0.PE7, ssp. ulegeica—0.PE5, and ssp. qinghaica—0.PE10.

Yersinia pestis virulence determinants

Plague prevention requires a complete understanding of Y. pestis complex pathogenesis, which relies on a finely regulated arsenal of virulence determinants [36]. Among them, the best characterized ones are the Yersinia outer-membrane proteins (Yops), which constitute an array of effectors directly translocated into host cells through a type 3 secretion system (T3SS) [37,38,39]. The T3SS is encoded in the Yersinia virulence plasmid pYV/pCD1, which is also present in the enteric pathogens Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica. As previously mentioned, the emergence of Y. pestis from Y. pseudotuberculosis is associated with the acquisition of the pFra and pPla plasmids, which encode critical virulence factors (see below), as well as major gene loss (gene deletions, SNP-based, or phase-variable/mutation-based pseudogenes) that had a major impact in adaptation to the flea vector [11]. Here, we will review virulence determinants for mammalian hosts.

Yops have been shown to play pleiotropic roles during infection: they inhibit Rho GTPases and disrupt the actin cytoskeleton in order to inhibit phagocytosis, they downregulate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and they induce cell death by multiple sophisticated mechanisms [40] (Fig. 2) (see also next section). For example, the tyrosine phosphatase YopH dephosphorylates focal adhesion complex proteins of immune cells [41]. YopE mimics GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) to downregulate host cell Rho GTPases [42]. The cysteine protease YopT cleaves and releases membrane-bound Rho GTPases [43]. YopJ is an acetyltransferase blocking both mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling, inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [44, 45]. The serine/threonine kinase YpkA targets actin-regulating proteins and keeps Rho GTPases inactive through its guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) domain [46]. YopM binds caspase-1 to arrest inflammasome assembly and activation [47], and behaves as a nucleomodulin modifying Interleukin-10 mRNA levels [48]. It is also an E3 ubiquitin ligase targeting NLRP3 and triggers host cell necrosis [49]. YopK is a particular virulence-associated factor that modulates the rate of injection of other Yops from within host cells [50] and also inhibits inflammasome activation [51]. It is important to highlight, as previously mentioned, that the function of several Yops has been studied only in Y. pseudotuberculosis or Y. enterocolitica, and remains to be investigated in Y. pestis.

Fig. 2

Yersinia pestis virulence determinants. Y. pestis requires the three well-characterized virulence plasmids pYV/pCD1, pPla/pPCP1, and pFra/pMT1, as well as chromosomally encoded virulence factors to cause disease. Examples of cytoplasmic, cell-surface associated, and secreted virulence factors are shown. The infectious process involves adhesion to host cells mediated by Braun lipoproteins Lpp and proteins such as Ail, PsaA, and Pla. Yop effectors, including YopH, YopE, YopT, YopJ, YpkA, YopM, and YopK, are subsequently delivered through the T3SS to trigger apoptosis, inhibit phagocytosis, and block cytokine production. LPS modification and the capsular antigen F1 encoded by the caf gene further contribute to Yersinia immune escape. The expression of many of these virulence determinants is induced during the transition from the temperature of the flea midgut (26 °C) to that of the mammalian host (37 °C). Y. pestis survival in the host requires efficient metal acquisition systems. The yersiniabactin-dependent iron uptake system is encoded in the high-pathogenicity island within the pigmentation chromosomal locus pgm. Other metal transport systems, including YbtX, ZnuABC, Yfe, and Feo, also play a role in infection. Additional virulence factors have been identified by signature-tagged mutagenesis, “per-pool” mutant screening, or in vivo transcriptional profiling, e.g., YMPY1.66c, BrnQ, RbsA, GspE, NirC, CyoABCDE, PspABC, Ypo0862, Ypo1119, Ypo1120, Ypo1501, and Ypo 2884. BCAA: branched-chain amino acids, Fe: iron, LPS: lipopolysaccharide, T2SS: type-two secretion system, T3SS: type-three secretion system, T6SS: type-six secretion system, Ybt: yersiniabactin, Yop: Yersinia outer-membrane protein, Zn: zinc. Components of the illustration are not drawn to scale

Delivery of Yop effectors as well as cell invasion require adhesion of Y. pestis to host cells. Chromosomally encoded Ail outer-membrane protein contributes to cell attachment, Yop delivery, and serum resistance [52]. Another factor promoting Yop secretion is the Psa fimbriae (pH 6 antigen) that inhibit phagocytosis by macrophages and mediate Yersinia binding to epithelial cells by interacting with glycosphingolipids and phosphatidylcholine [53]. In contrast, the pFra/pMT1-encoded capsular antigen fraction 1 (F1) prevents bacterial uptake by inhibiting adhesion [54]. Subversion of host innate immunity also relies on abundant outer-membrane components, including the Braun lipoprotein Lpp [55] and the lipopolysaccharide, whose lipid A moiety is differentially acylated in a temperature-dependent manner by the acyltransferase MsbB (LpxM) [56]. The absence of the LpxL/HtrB acyltransferase in Y. pestis yields a tetra-acylated LPS, an antagonist for TLR4 receptors, which thus counteracts innate immunity [57]. The protease Pla, encoded in the 9.5-kb plasmid pPla/pPCP1, is another outer-membrane protein playing a key role in Y. pestis virulence through its adhesive, invasive, fibrinolytic, and coagulase properties. It has been shown to cleave multiple host cell substrates in vitro and/or in vivo, including plasminogen, alpha-2-antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, urokinase plasminogen activator, C3 complement component, Fas ligand FasL, and the dual peroxidase/phospholipase peroxiredoxin [58, 59]. Pla, Ail, and F1 have been detected in outer-membrane vesicles, which may contribute to pathogenesis by dispersion and delivery of virulence factors [60].

Recently, novel virulence factors have been identified using a “per-pool” mutant screening method [61], as well as transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) and signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM) approaches [62, 63]. By investigating a library of Y. pestis mutants, the gene ympt1.66c (encoding a putative helicase) was identified as required for bacterial intracellular survival during the early stages of bubonic plague [61]. Besides known virulence genes, genome-wide fitness profiling led to the identification of more than 30 genes involved in nutrient acquisition and metabolism, which were necessary for infection, including the branched-chain amino-acid importer BrnQ [62]. Using STM and a murine model of pneumonic plague, a total of 118 mutants were found to have a lower capacity to colonize the spleen [63]. A secondary screen revealed that 20 out of the 118 individual mutants displayed attenuated virulence similarly in a murine model of bubonic plague: mutations were present not only in Pla but also in proteins of unknown function that require further characterization. Moreover, the study uncovered roles in Y. pestis pathogenesis for the type 6 secretion system (T6SS) component VasK and the ribose transport system ATP-binding protein RbsA [63]. Additional T6SS components have been shown to play an important role in macrophage cytotoxicity, resistance to phagocytosis, and in a murine model of pneumonic plague [64]. In the same study, four new factors identified by STM were confirmed to contribute to virulence in mice, namely the general secretion pathway protein E of the type 2 secretion system GspE, the βγ crystallin superfamily protein Ypo2884, the cytochrome o oxidase CyoABCDE, and the multifunctional Tol-Pal system proteins Ypo1119–1120 [64]. Further investigation will be required to understand their role in pathogenesis.

A critical property of bacterial pathogens is their capacity to overcome nutritional immunity, i.e., host sequestration of essential metals such as iron and zinc [65], a mechanism which can protect against plague [66]. To acquire iron, Y. pestis secretes the siderophore yersiniabactin (Ybt), which has been shown to be essential for bubonic and pneumonic plague [67]. In addition, the Yfe and Feo metal transporters play a role in bubonic plague [68]. Interestingly, the Ybt biosynthetic machinery is also necessary for zinc uptake by Y. pestis. Together with Ybt, the ABC transporter ZnuABC and YbtX, a member of the major facilitator superfamily, contribute to infection in murine models of plague [6971]. YbtX was among the five new virulence factors involved in the development of pneumonic plague in mice that were identified using in vivo transcriptional profiling of Y. pestis [70]. The role of the other four factors, the phage-shock system PspABC, the protein of unknown function YPO0862, the putative esterase YPO1501, and the nitrite transporter NirC, remains to be defined.

Yersinia pestis and subversion of host innate immunity

One of the most surprising features of Y. pestis infection, either through a flea bite or through contamination via respiratory droplets, is the brutal transition from an absence of immune response and clinical symptoms, to a bursting inflammation and fatal sepsis with abundant bacteria in the body. This lag period has been termed “pre-inflammatory phase” and benefits Y. pestis, which migrates toward lymph nodes (bubonic plague) or lungs (pneumonic plague) to multiply silently. This immune evasion is exerted by several mechanisms that include the T3SS-mediated neutralization of immune cells (see the previous section), the absence of detectable pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs [57]), and modulation of host innate immune cell interactions (detailed below).

Neutrophils are a very early line of innate defense and inflammation at infection sites. It was commonly accepted that Y. pestis is eliminated effectively when phagocytosed by neutrophils, but survives and replicates when phagocytosed by macrophages. It has now been shown that Y. pestis grown at flea temperature (close to that of the host skin) at which the T3SS is not yet upregulated, can survive and replicate within human neutrophils [72]. Y. pestis can also transit from this first niche to a second one when macrophages phagocytose infected neutrophils in a cleaning process named efferocytosis [73]. Within macrophages, Y. pestis can survive in autophagosomes [74], and it has recently been shown that Y. pestis is also capable of inhibiting phagosomal maturation by perturbing the host endosomal recycling pathway, allowing bacterial intracellular replication [75, 76]. Efferocytosis is accompanied by secretion of IL-1RA [73], a cytokine exerting anti-inflammatory effects by blocking IL-1R1 signaling: this strategy would allow Y. pestis to reduce innate immunity mechanisms and multiply, meanwhile upregulating its T3SS. Then, in target organs, Y. pestis would preferentially inject Yops in neutrophils by specifically recognizing their surface complement receptor 3 [77] and resists neutrophils toxic effectors through the activity of the lysozyme inhibitor Ivy [78] and the two-component regulatory system OmpR-EnvZ [79].

How Y. pestis disseminates from skin flea injection sites to lymph nodes was unknown and it was suspected that phagocytes (i.e., macrophages, dendritic cells, or neutrophils) could carry the bacteria. This scenario has been challenged by recent observations in murine models of infection, suggesting that the Y. pestis spread from the skin is very rapidly achieved [80] in the absence of interactions with host cells [81], suggesting therefore that bacterial transport to the draining lymph nodes can be driven solely by lymph flow [82]. However, an intracellular carriage by dendritic cells and monocytes motivated principally by sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P)-driven chemotaxis toward lymph nodes was also reported, that probably occurs more slowly [83].

Within the infected lymph nodes, several pathways of cell death have been proposed to be activated by Y. pestis [84]. Applying murine Y. pseudotuberculosis infection models, it has been suggested that the T3SS effector YopJ induces macrophage apoptosis [85], a noninflammatory mechanism required for bacterial systemic infection [86]. However, in a bubonic rat infection model, YopJ-induced apoptosis was not required for Y. pestis virulence [87]. Necroptosis has been proposed to be required for Y. pestis dissemination from lymph nodes during the pre-inflammatory phase: cell membrane rupture leads to bacterial release and subsequent capture by phagocytes chemotactically attracted by S1P [88]. Bacterial intracellular carriage by dendritic cells and monocytes would then mediate Y. pestis node-to-node trafficking [83]. Of note, it has been reported that Y. pseudotuberculosis redirects apoptosis to caspase-1-dependent inflammatory pyroptosis in pre-activated cells [89], and Y. pestis-induced pyroptosis results from YopJ blockade of kinase TAK1, which activates caspase-8 and pore-forming gasdermin D [90]. Paradoxically, other Yops (YopM and YopK) oppose to pyroptosis by preventing inflammasome and caspase-1 activation [47, 51]. How Y. pestis could induce necroptosis also requires clarification, as caspase-8 cleavage, the signal for Y. pestis-induced cell death [91], has been reported to inhibit necroptosis [92]. Interestingly, caspase-8 also controls antibacterial immunity and Toll-like receptor-induced cytokine production, and mice lacking caspase-8 are highly susceptible to Yersinia infection [93].

Despite being caused by the same pathogen, pneumonic plague differs from bubonic plague by the mode of infection (aerosols versus fleas), the target tissue (lungs versus skin/lymph nodes), and ultimately pathophysiology and lethality. The pre-inflammatory phase during pneumonic plague generates a permissive environment that allows Y. pestis growth [94]. Resident alveolar macrophages are targeted early in infection, followed by preferential targeting of neutrophils in the later stages [95]. Inflammasome-dependent IL-1β/IL-18 release occurs early after bacteria enter the lung, but fails to cause inflammation due to the simultaneous release of anti-inflammatory IL-RA blocking IL-1 receptors [96]. Therefore, and interestingly, IL-1RA thus seems to play a key role in establishing the pre-inflammatory phase of both bubonic and pneumonic forms of plague [73, 96]. In the latter, during the pro-inflammatory stage associated with clinical symptoms, neutrophils attracted to lungs are responsible for the pneumonia and necrosis destroying the lungs [95]. In this context, the T3SS effector YopK is a critical modulator of macrophage apoptosis and promotes progression of pneumonic plague toward the inflammatory stage [97]. An important distinction between bubonic and pneumonic plague is the temperature of the environment in which the bacteria grew prior to transmission: Y. pestis infecting lungs via aerosols that initially grew at 37 °C in the contaminating patient’s lungs [98], have therefore an upregulated T3SS and are thus more able than bacteria grown below 30 °C in fleas to kill host cells. It has been shown that YopM inhibits the death of neutrophils in the center of lung lesions, preventing the release of their bactericidal and inflammatory content [99]. In consequence, as in the bubo, a delay in cell death contributes to the lag before the pro-inflammatory phase.

The existence of a pre-inflammatory phase during plague suggested that intervention to trigger a faster response of innate immunity could possibly counteract infection, as first indicated by an earlier report that inflammation resulting from a strong lipopolysaccharide response overcame Y. pestis virulence [57]. Two recent studies further show that specifically fostering the action of neutrophils or macrophages, respectively, at the very onset of the disease can control Y. pestis infection process. In mouse lungs, a cytokine-induced recruitment of neutrophils reduced bacterial counts and improved survival from pneumonic plague [100]. In a mouse bubonic plague model, transferring M1-polarized macrophages also enhanced survival [101].

Innate immunity mechanisms are amplified when adaptive immunity is effective, such as after vaccination (see next section), and contribute to protection. In that regard, several recent observations point to a role for IL-17 in both wings of this response. During the innate response, IL-17 acts by inducing production of antimicrobial peptides and attracting neutrophils [102], as well as by activating macrophages to produce IFNγ [103]. IL-17-producing T lymphocytes (Th17 cells) have been reported to be essential to cure pneumonic plague [104]. Surprisingly, a mechanism of Th17 induction may be injection of Yops into naive T cells, as observed with Y. pseudotuberculosis [105]. In agreement, vaccination using a live attenuated Y. pestis NIIEG strain induces a Th17 polarization in humans [106]. Moreover, Th17 cells may develop in parallel to Th1 ones, as was observed with a live Y. pseudotuberculosis oral plague vaccine [107]. Therefore, IL-17 appears important against plague, and how it is limited during the pre-inflammatory phase needs to be determined (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Innate immunity subversion by Yersinia pestis. Schematic representation of Y. pestis transmission and migration in the human body during bubonic (upper panel) and pneumonic plague (lower panel). The effect of temperature of origin and its effects on the bacterium are indicated at various steps. A focus is given on innate immunity host cells encountered by the pathogen and involved in immune evasion mechanisms described in the text, which are shown as zoomed areas

Vaccination against plague

Despite considerable progress in prevention and cure, natural foci still exist in Africa, Asia, and America, and plague is endemic in more than 25 countries worldwide, which would benefit from vaccination. No new vaccine has recently been licensed in Europe or in the United States to replace the killed whole-cell Y. pestis formerly produced in the United States and Australia, which was discontinued because of its short-lasting protection and low efficiency. The live Y. pestis EV vaccine previously used with benefit in Madagascar, and still used in Asia and Russia, was never licensed in occidental countries. Most current efforts are focused on vaccines against pneumonic plague, considering Y. pestis as a potential biowarfare agent. The most advanced candidates are molecular vaccines developed by the United States, the United Kingdom, and China governmental agencies, and are patented but not yet licensed. They combine Y. pestis F1 and V antigens and are called rF1-V, RypVax, and SV1, respectively. F1 is the main protein component of the pseudocapsule, and is a dispensable virulence factor. The V antigen (LcrV) is an essential part of the T3SS. Two doses of these F1/V vaccines provide 100% protection to mice against bubonic and pneumonic plague [108,109,110,111]. However, when F1-V was tested in nonhuman primates, Cynomolgus macaques could be protected against aerosolized Y. pestis, but not African green monkeys [112]. Therefore, it is not yet clear whether F1-V would reliably provide protection to humans. Because rF1-V and SV1 have completed phase I and II trials, WHO recently gathered experts to define principles on how to build phase III plague vaccine efficacy trials in endemic countries [113]. rF1-V is announced for 2021 for use by the US army and licensure in the United States can be obtained following FDA’s “Animal rule”, a procedure which applies when traditional efficacy trials in humans are unethical or impractical [114].

Several other vaccine candidates have been proposed. Many Y. pestis strains attenuated by genetic engineering are immunogenic and confer protection, but none was brought to the clinical evaluation phases. Another molecular vaccine, patented by the University of Chicago and called V10, is composed of a shorter V antigen only, and provided 100% protection against bubonic and pneumonic plague to mice and Cynomolgus macaques [115]. Live vector vaccines producing F1 and V have also been developed, using the modified Vaccinia virus (strain Ankara: MVA) or attenuated Salmonella as a vector. However, these vaccines did not progress to clinical trials. A live Y. pseudotuberculosis may also be a valuable vaccine against plague [116, 117]. We developed a live attenuated Y. pseudotuberculosis strain producing the F1 pseudocapsule, named VTnF1 [107]. Because a single oral dose provided protection of mice against bubonic and pneumonic forms caused by high doses of Y. pestis, VTnF1 appears as a very promising plague vaccine candidate.

Plague diagnostics: lessons from the 2017 pneumonic plague outbreak in Madagascar

As previously mentioned, pneumonic plague is transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets. After an incubation period of 24–96 h, the disease progresses rapidly and is nearly always fatal in a few days in the absence of an early antimicrobial treatment. From August to November 2017, Madagascar experienced an unprecedentedly large pneumonic plague outbreak with multiple foci, including two main urban areas: Antananarivo, the capital, and Toamasina, the main seaport [10]. A total of 2414 suspected cases were reported. Spread of pneumonic plague was of great concern as its propagation is favored by the closeness of people, especially in the densely populated cities. Health authorities urgently had to organize the screening of the suspected patients, the collection of samples for biological diagnosis, the prompt treatment of patients, and the follow-up of the contacts. In the context of this outbreak, light was brought toward the specific problems associated with the diagnosis of pneumonic plague.

Screening of the suspected patients was based on epidemiological and clinical criteria, as described in the case definition provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) [118] and biological samples were collected at the points of care. Biological diagnosis of pneumonic plague highly relies on the quality of the sample: since pneumonic plague is a lower respiratory tract infection, deep respiratory secretions are required for biological tests, not saliva or spit. However, during an outbreak, the aim is to diagnose the disease during the invasion phase before the onset of severe symptoms. Thus, producing good-quality sputum is often difficult for patients with mild symptoms and also for children. Moreover, since sputum specimens can be viscous and thick, liquefaction and homogenization are fully required before execution of some specific biological assays [119] (see below). However, because of lack of reagents, equipment, and trained staff, this first step of the process is seldom performed at local points of care, resulting in wrong interpretations of subsequent biological assays. The rapid diagnostic test (RDT), based on the detection of the F1 antigen of Y. pestis [120], is a practical method that can be implemented by trained staff at local points of care, can provide results within 15 min, and has been validated for diagnosis of bubonic plague. Nevertheless, its performances in sputum still need to be evaluated. Indeed, false-negative and false-positive results may be observed with sticky expectorations, due to absence or incomplete sample migration along the dipstick. False-negative results may also occur with saliva. Therefore, clinically pneumonic plague-suspected patients must be treated without considering the result of the bedside RDT.

Molecular biology tests have been developed in order to reduce the delay and increase the sensitivity of diagnostics (Fig. 4). Conventional polymerase chain reactions (PCR) targeting the pla, caf1, inv, and yopM genes [121, 122] reduce the delay of diagnostics to 3–4 h, while real-time PCR can be performed in only 2 h. The pla gene is located on the pPla/pPCP1 plasmid, which is present in 150–200 copies per bacterium [123], resulting in a high sensitivity. A real-time PCR targeting pla in the sputum [124] displays a sensitivity of 100 cfu/ml in spiked sputum. However, pla may also be found in other Enterobacteriaceae such as Citrobacter koseri and Escherichia coli [125] and these bacteria may be present in the sputum. Therefore, the sputum must be tested by multiplex real-time PCR, targeting additional genes. The caf1 gene is located on the pFra/pMT1 plasmid, which is considered specific to Y. pestis, but it is present in only about two copies per bacterium [123]. A multiplex real-time PCR on pla and caf1 has been described [126] but it was tested only in patients with suspected bubonic plague (not on sputum). The yopM gene, located on the Yersinia virulence plasmid pYV/pCD1, is present in about four copies per bacterium, but pYV may also be found in Y. pseudotuberculosis and pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains. The inv gene is a chromosomal gene present in Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis; an insertion in Y. pestis made it larger [127] and a conventional PCR may distinguish it by the amplicon sizes produced in Y. pseudotuberculosis (400 bp) compared with Y. pestis (1100 bp). During the 2017 pneumonic plague outbreak in Madagascar, the strategy chosen to detect Y. pestis DNA was first to test the samples by a multiplex real-time PCR targeting pla and caf1, and to confirm the uncertain cases by a conventional PCR targeting pla, caf1, inv1100bp, and yopM. It is worth mentioning that the chromosomal gene ypo2088 is specific to Y. pestis and spiked expectorations have been successfully tested by real-time PCR targeting this gene [128]. Molecular biology tests are usually performed in hospitals and research institutions; however, portable real-time PCR instruments are being developed and could be helpful in remote plague endemic areas [129]. Assays relying on the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technology have also been developed [130], but they still remain to be evaluated on sputum.

Fig. 4

Plague diagnostics: from presumption to confirmation. Upon plague suspicion, according to epidemiological and clinical criteria, collected samples (sputum, expectoration) can be analyzed for the detection of the Y. pestis capsular antigen F1 using the rapid diagnostic test (RDT: the C band is a migration control, and the T band reveals the presence of F1). Confirmation is performed through detection of Y. pestis DNA using real-time PCR targeting pla and caf1, and in the case of discordant or uncertain results, a PCR targeting pla, caf1, and inv is performed. Isolation of Y. pestis remains the gold standard in biological diagnostic tests: culture on selective CIN media is followed by bacterial identification using biochemical tests or mass spectrometry, confirmation using PCR, and phage lysis. Boxed area: algorithm for molecular tests using qPCR and PCR (reprinted from ref. [135])

Among the biological diagnostic tests, microbial isolation of Y. pestis remains the gold standard. Although Y. pestis can grow on usual culture media, the use of a selective agar supplemented in cefsulodin–irgasan–novobiocin (CIN) favors the isolation of the bacterium in polymicrobial samples such as sputum. WHO recommendations are to rinse the mouth out with water prior to sample collection in order to reduce the contaminations by the oral flora [131]. After 2- or 3-day incubation at 28 °C, suspected colonies on CIN agar may be identified by biochemical tests, PCR, and Y. pestis-specific phage lysis. Automated identification systems are more and more often used in the laboratories: they are fast and can efficiently identify a large variety of bacteria; however, misidentifications of Y. pestis have been reported [132]; therefore, a reference laboratory must always confirm the taxonomic assignation.

Concluding remarks

Due to its exceptional virulence, its multiple modes of transmission and pathogenesis, its outstanding skills to escape host molecular and cellular immunity mechanisms, and the indelible mark it has left on human societies in the past, Y. pestis is a remarkable model to study infection and the evolution of bacterial pathogenicity. The recent improvement in high-end technologies, allowing whole-genome sequencing and more resolution in vitro as well as in vivo microscopy, has directly benefitted the understanding of various aspects of plague, including bacterial phylogeny, pandemics history, pathogenesis mechanisms, and subversion of immune responses.

However, several aspects of plague natural history are still incompletely understood. The ecology of Y. pestis in the environment remains to be fully explored, as novel potential reservoirs are discovered [133, 134]. Some molecular mechanisms of virulence of Y. pestis have been inferred from comparisons with other pathogenic Yersiniae, including the enteric pathogens Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica, which might bias our understanding of plague. More studies using fully virulent Y. pestis strains are required to completely grasp the physiopathology of the disease. The bacillus discovered 125 years ago by Alexandre Yersin has still a lot of secrets to reveal.


  1. 1.

    Stenseth NC, Atshabar BB, Begon M, Belmain SR, Bertherat E, Carniel E, et al. Plague: past, present, and future. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Perry RD, Fetherston JD. Yersinia pestis—etiologic agent of plague. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:35–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yersin A. La peste bubonique a Hong-Kong. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris). 1894;8:662–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vogler AJ, Chan F, Nottingham R, Andersen G, Drees K, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, et al. A decade of plague in mahajanga, madagascar: insights into the global maritime spread of pandemic plague. mBio. 2013;4:e00623–12–e00623–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bertherat E. Plague around the world, 2010–2015. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2016;91:89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Respicio-Kingry LB, Yockey BM, Acayo S, Kaggwa J, Apangu T, Kugeler KJ, et al. Two distinct Yersinia pestis populations causing plague among humans in the West Nile region of Uganda. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004360.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shi L, Yang G, Zhang Z, Xia L, Liang Y, Tan H, et al. Reemergence of human plague in Yunnan, China in 2016. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198067.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Abedi AA, Shako J-C, Gaudart J, Sudre B, Ilunga BK, Shamamba SKB, et al. Ecologic features of plague outbreak areas, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2004–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:210–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Andrianaivoarimanana V, Piola P, Wagner DM, Rakotomanana F, Maheriniaina V, Andrianalimanana S, et al. Trends of human plague, madagascar, 1998–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:220–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Randremanana R, Andrianaivoarimanana V, Nikolai B, Ramasindrazana B, Paireau J, ten Bosch QA, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of urban plague epidemic in Madagascar, August–November 2017: an outbreak report. Lancet Infect Dis. (in press).

  11. 11.

    McNally A, Thomson NR, Reuter S, Wren BW. ‘Add, stir and reduce’: Yersinia spp. as model bacteria for pathogen evolution. Nat Rev Micro. 2016;14:177–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hinnebusch BJ, Jarrett CO, Bland DM. ‘Fleaing’ the plague: adaptations of Yersinia pestisto Its insect vector that lead to transmission. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017;71:215–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Valtueña AA, Mittnik A, Key FM, Haak W, Allmäe R, Belinskij A, et al. The stone age plague and its persistence in Eurasia. Curr Biol. 2017;27:3683. e8

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rascovan N, Sjögren K-G, Kristiansen K, Nielsen R, Willerslev E, Desnues C, et al. Emergence and Spread of Basal Lineages of Yersinia pestis during the Neolithic Decline. Cell. 2019;176:295–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rasmussen S, Allentoft ME, Nielsen K, Orlando L, Sikora M, Sjögren K-G, et al. Early divergent strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 years ago. Cell. 2015;163:571–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Spyrou MA, Tukhbatova RI, Wang C-C, Valtueña AA, Lankapalli AK, Kondrashin VV, et al. Analysis of 3800-year-old Yersinia pestis genomes suggests Bronze Age origin for bubonic plague. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sun Y-C, Jarrett CO, Bosio CF, Hinnebusch BJ. Retracing the evolutionary path that ledto flea-borne transmission of Yersinia pestis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:578–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cui Y, Yu C, Yan Y, Li D, Li Y, Jombart T, et al. Historical variations in mutation rate in an epidemic pathogen, Yersinia pestis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:577–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chouikha I, Hinnebusch BJ. Silencing urease: A key evolutionary step that facilitated the adaptation of Yersinia pestisto the flea-borne transmission route. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:18709–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zimbler DL, Schroeder JA, Eddy JL, Lathem WW. Early emergence of Yersinia pestis as a severe respiratory pathogen. Nature. Communications. 2015;6:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Harbeck M, Seifert L, Hänsch S, Wagner DM, Birdsell D, Parise KL, et al. Yersinia pestis DNA from Skeletal Remains from the 6th Century AD Reveals Insights into Justinianic Plague. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003349.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wagner DM, Klunk J, Harbeck M, Devault A, Waglechner N, Sahl JW, et al. Yersinia pestis and the plague of Justinian 541-543 AD: a genomic analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:319–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bos KI, Schuenemann VJ, Golding GB, Burbano HA, Waglechner N, Coombes BK, et al. A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death. Nature. 2011;478:506–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Haensch S, Bianucci R, Signoli M, Rajerison M, Schultz M, Kacki S, et al. Distinct clones of Yersinia pestis caused the black death. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001134.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kutyrev VV, Eroshenko GA, Motin VL, Nosov NY, Krasnov JM, Kukleva LM, et al. Phyloogeny and classification of Yersinia pestis through the lens of strains from the plague foci of commonwealth of independent states. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:14043.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Namouchi A, Guellil M, Kersten O, Hänsch S, Ottoni C, Schmid BV, et al. Integrative approach using Yersinia pestisgenomes to revisit the historical landscape of plague during the Medieval Period. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;918:201812865.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schmid BV, Büntgen U, Easterday WR, Ginzler C, Walløe L, Bramanti B, et al. Climate-driven introduction of the Black Death and successive plague reintroductions into Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:3020–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yue RPH, Lee HF, Wu CYH. Trade routes and plaguetransmission in pre-industrial Europe. Sci Rep.2017;7:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bos KI, Herbig A, Sahl J, Waglechner N, Fourment M, Forrest SA, et al. Eighteenth century Yersinia pestis genomes reveal the long-term persistence of an historical plague focus. eLife. 2016;5:e12994.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Spyrou MA, Tukhbatova RI, Feldman M, Drath J, Kacki S, de Heredia JB, et al. Historical Y. pestis genomes reveal the European Black Death as the source of ancient and modern plague pandemics. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:874–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Seifert L, Wiechmann I, Harbeck M, Thomas A, Grupe G, Projahn M, et al. Genotyping Yersinia pestis in historical plague: evidence for long-term persistence of Y. pestis in Europe from the 14th to the 17th century. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0145194.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dean KR, Krauer F, Walløe L, Lingjærde OC, Bramanti B, Stenseth NC, et al. Human ectoparasites and the spread of plague in Europe during the second pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:1304–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Morelli G, Song Y, Mazzoni CJ, Eppinger M, Roumagnac P, Wagner DM, et al. Yersinia pestis. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1140–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Riehm JM, Projahn M, Vogler AJ, Rajerison M, Andersen G, Hall CM, et al. Diverse genotypes of Yersinia pestis caused plague in Madagascar in 2007. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003844.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Vogler AJ, Andrianaivoarimanana V, Telfer S, Hall CM, Sahl JW, Hepp CM, et al. Temporal phylogeography of Yersinia pestis in Madagascar: insights into the long-term maintenance of plague. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005887.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Atkinson S, Williams P. Yersinia virulence factors-a sophisticated arsenal for combating host defences. F1000Research. 2016;5:1370–10.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cornelis GR. The Yersinia Ysc–Yop ‘Type III’ weaponry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:742–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Diepold A, Sezgin E, Huseyin M, Mortimer T, Eggeling C, Armitage JP. A dynamic and adaptive network of cytosolic interactions governs protein export by the T3SS injectisome. Nat Commun.2017;8:15940.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nauth T, Huschka F, Schweizer M, Bosse JB, Diepold A, Failla AV, et al. Visualization of translocons in Yersinia type III protein secretion machines during host cell infection. PLOS Pathog. 2018;14(12):e1007527.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Trosky JE, Liverman ADB, Orth K. Yersinia outer proteins: Yops. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:557–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Persson C, Carballeira N, Wolf-Watz H, Fallman M. The PTPase YopH inhibits uptake of Yersinia, tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas and FAK, and the associated accumulation of these proteins in peripheral focal adhesions. EMBO J. 1997;16:2307–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Evdokimov AG, Tropea JE, Routzahn KM, Waugh DS. Crystal structure of the Yersinia pestis GTPase activator YopE. Protein Sci. 2009;11:401–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shao F, Merritt PM, Bao Z, Innes RW, Dixon JE. A Yersinia effector and a Pseudomonas avirulence protein define a family of cysteine proteases functioning in bacterial pathogenesis. Cell. 2002;109:575–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Orth K, Xu Z, Mudgett MB, Bao ZQ, Palmer LE, Bliska JB, et al. Disruption of signaling by Yersinia effector YopJ, a ubiquitin-like protein protease. Science. 2000;290:1594–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mukherjee S, Keitany G, Li Y, Wang Y, Ball HL, Goldsmith EJ, et al. Yersinia YopJ acetylates and inhibits kinase activation by blocking phosphorylation. Science. 2006;312:1211–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Prehna G, Ivanov MI, Bliska JB, Stebbins CE. Yersinia virulence depends on mimicry of host rho-family nucleotide dissociation inhibitors. Cell. 2006;126:869–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    LaRock CN, Cookson BT. The Yersinia virulence effector YopM brinds caspase-1 to arrest inflammasome assembly and processing. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:799–805.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Berneking L, Schnapp M, Rumm A, Trasak C, Ruckdeschel K, Alawi M, et al. Immunosuppressive Yersinia Effector YopM Binds DEAD Box Helicase DDX3 to Control Ribosomal S6 Kinase in the Nucleus of Host Cells. PLOS Pathog. 2016;12(6):e1005660.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wei C, Wang Y, Du Z, Guan K, Cao Y, Yang H, et al. The Yersinia Type III secretion effector YopM Is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that induced necrotic cell death by targeting NLRP3. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2519.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dewoody R, Merritt PM, Houppert AS, Marketon MM. YopK regulates the Yersinia pestis type III secretion system from within host cells. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79:1445–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Brodsky IE, Palm NW, Sadanand S, Ryndak MB, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA, et al. A Yersinia effector protein promotes virulence by preventing inflammasome recognition of the type III secretion system. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7:376–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Thomson JJ, Plecha SC, Krukonis ES. Ail provides multiple mechanisms of serum resistance to Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111:82–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bao R, Nair MKM, Tang W-K, Esser L, Sadhukhan A, Holland RL, et al. Structural basis for the specific recognition of dual receptors by the homopolymeric pH 6 antigen (Psa) fimbriae of Yersinia pestis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1065–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liu F, Chen H, Galvan EM, Lasaro MA, Schifferli DM. Effects of Psa and F1 on the Adhesive and invasive interactions of Yersinia pestis with human respiratory tract epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5636–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sha J, Agar SL, Baze WB, Olano JP, Fadl AA, Erova TE, et al. Braun Lipoprotein (Lpp) Contributes to Virulence of Yersiniae: potential Role of Lpp in Inducing Bubonic and Pneumonic Plague. Infect Immun. 2008;76:1390–409.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sha J, Kirtley ML, van Lier CJ, Wang S, Erova TE, Kozlova EV, et al. Deletion of the Braun lipoprotein-encoding gene and altering the function of lipopolysaccharide attenuate the plague bacterium. Infect Immun. 2013;81:815–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Montminy SW, Khan N, McGrath S, Walkowicz MJ, Sharp F, Conlon JE, et al. Virulence factors of Yersinia pestis are overcome by a strong lipopolysaccharide response. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1066–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lathem WW, Price PA, Miller VL, Goldman WE. A plasminogen-activating protease specifically controls the development of primary pneumonic plague. Science. 2007;315:509–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zimbler DL, Eddy JL, Schroeder JA, Lathem WW. Inactivation of peroxiredoxin 6 by the Pla protease of Yersinia pestis. Infect Immun. 2015;84:365–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Eddy JL, Gielda LM, Caulfield AJ, Rangel SM, Lathem WW. Production of outer membrane vesicles by the plague pathogen Yersinia pestis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107002.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Pradel E, Lemaître N, Merchez M, Ricard I, Reboul A, Dewitte A, et al. New insights into how Yersinia pestis adapts to its mammalian host during bubonic plague. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004029.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Palace SG, Proulx MK, Lu S, Baker RE, Goguen JD. Genome-wide mutant fitness profiling identifies nutritional requirements for optimal growth of Yersinia pestis in deep tissue. mBio. 2014;5:e01385–14–e01385–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ponnusamy D, Fitts EC, Sha J, Erova TE, Kozlova EV, Kirtley ML, et al. High-throughput, signature-tagged mutagenic approach to identify novel virulence factors of Yersinia pestis CO92 in a mouse model of infection. Infect Immun. 2015;83:2065–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Andersson JA, Sha J, Erova TE, Fitts EC, Ponnusamy D, Kozlova EV, et al. Identification of new virulence factors and vaccine candidates for Yersinia pestis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:3717.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: transitionmetals at the pathogen–host interface. Nat Rev Micro. 2012;10:525–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zauberman A, Vagima Y, Tidhar A, Aftalion M, Gur D, Rotem S, et al. Host iron nutritional immunity induced by a live Yersinia pestis vaccine strain is associated with immediate protection against plague. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:183.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Fetherston JD, Kirillina O, Bobrov AG, Paulley JT, Perry RD. The yersiniabactin transport system is critical for the pathogenesis of bubonic and pneumonic plague. Infect Immun. 2010;78:2045–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Fetherston JD, Mier I, Truszczynska H, Perry RD. The Yfe and Feo transporters are involved in microaerobic growth and virulence of Yersinia pestis in bubonic plague. Infect Immun. 2012;80:3880–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bobrov AG, Kirillina O, Fetherston JD, Miller MC, Burlison JA, Perry RD. The Yersinia pestissiderophore, yersiniabactin, and the ZnuABC system both contribute to zinc acquisition and the development of lethal septicaemic plague in mice. Mol Microbiol. 2014;93:759–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Pechous RD, Broberg CA, Stasulli NM, Miller VL, Goldman WE. In vivo transcriptional profiling of Yersinia pestis reveals a novel bacterial mediator of pulmonary inflammation. mBio. 2015;6:e02302–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bobrov AG, Kirillina O, Fosso MY, Fetherston JD, Miller MC, VanCleave TT, et al. Metallomics. Metallomics. 2017;9:757–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shannon JG, Hasenkrug AM, Dorward DW, Nair V, Carmody AB, Hinnebusch BJ. Yersinia pestis subverts the dermal neutrophil response in a mouse model of bubonic plague. mBio. 2013;4:e00170–13–e00170–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Spinner JL, Winfree S, Starr T, Shannon JG, Nair V, Steele-Mortimer O, et al. Yersinia pestis survival and replication within human neutrophil phagosomes and uptake of infected neutrophils by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;95:389–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Pujol C, Klein KA, Romanov GA, Palmer LE, Cirota C, Zhao Z, et al. Yersinia pestis can reside in autophagosomes and avoid xenophagy in murine macrophages by preventing vacuole acidification. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2251–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Connor MG, Pulsifer AR, Price CT, Abu Kwaik Y, Lawrenz MB. Yersinia pestis requires host Rab1b for survival in macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005241.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Connor MG, Pulsifer AR, Chung D, Rouchka EC, Ceresa BK, Lawrenz MB. Yersinia pestis targets the host endosome recycling pathway during the biogenesis of the Yersinia-containing vacuole to avoid killing by macrophages. mBio. 2018;9:e01800–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Merritt PM, Nero T, Bohman L, Felek S, Krukonis ES, Marketon MM. Yersinia pestistargets neutrophils via complement receptor 3. Cell Microbiol. 2014;17:666–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Derbise A, Pierre F, Merchez M, Pradel E, Laouami S, Ricard I, et al. Inheritance of the lysozyme inhibitor Ivy was an important evolutionary step by Yersinia pestis to avoid the host innate immune response. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1535–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Reboul A, Lemaître N, Titecat M, Merchez M, Deloison G, Ricard I, et al. Yersinia pestis requires the 2-component regulatory system OmpR-EnvZ to resist innate immunity during the early and late stages of plague. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1367–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Shannon JG, Bosio CF, Hinnebusch BJ. Dermal neutrophil, macrophage and dendritic cell responses to Yersinia pestis transmitted by fleas. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004734.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Gonzalez RJ, Lane MC, Wagner NJ, Weening EH, Miller VL. Dissemination of a highly virulent pathogen: tracking the early events that define infection. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004587.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Gonzalez RJ, Miller VL. A deadly path: bacterial spread during bubonic plague. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    St. John AL, Ang WXG, Huang M-N, Kunder CA, Chan EW, Gunn MD, et al. S1P-dependent trafficking of intracellular Yersinia pestis through lymph nodes establishes buboes and systemic infection. Immunity. 2014;41:440–50.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Chung LK, Bliska JB. Science direct Yersinia versus host immunity: how a pathogen evades or triggers a protective response. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;29:56–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Monack DM, Mecsas J, Ghori N, Falkow S. Yersinia signals macrophages to undergo apoptosis and YopJ is necessary for this cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10385–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Monack DM, Mecsas J, Bouley D, Falkow S. Yersinia-induced apoptosis in vivo aids in the establishment of a systemic infection of mice. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2127–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lemaître N, Sebbane F, Long D, Joseph Hinnebusch B. Yersinia pestis YopJ suppresses tumor necrosis factor alpha induction and contributes to apoptosis of immune cells in the lymph node but is not required for virulence in a rat model of bubonic plague. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5126–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Arifuzzaman M, Ang WXG, Choi HW, Nilles ML, St John AL, Abraham SN. Necroptosis of infiltrated macrophages drives Yersinia pestis dispersal within buboes. JCI Insight. 2018;3:35.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Bergsbaken T, Cookson BT. Macrophage activation redirects yersinia-infected host cell death from apoptosis to caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e161.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Orning P, Weng D, Starheim K, Ratner D, Best Z, Lee B, et al. Pathogen blockade of TAK1 triggers caspase-8–dependent cleavage of gasdermin D and cell death. Science. 2018;362:1064–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Weng D, Marty-Roix R, Ganesan S, Proulx MK, Vladimer GI, Kaiser WJ, et al. Caspase-8 and RIP kinases regulate bacteria-induced innate immune responses and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:7391–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    O’Donnell MA, Perez-Jimenez E, Oberst A, Ng A, Massoumi R, Xavier R, et al. Caspase 8 inhibits programmed necrosis by processing CYLD. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:1437–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Philip NH, DeLaney A, Peterson LW, Santos-Marrero M, Grier JT, Sun Y, et al. Activity of uncleaved caspase-8 controls anti-bacterial immune defense and TLR-induced cytokine production independent of cell death. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005910.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Price PA, Jin J, Goldman WE. Pulmonary infection by Yersinia pestis rapidly establishes a permissive environment for microbial proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:3083–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pechous RD, Sivaraman V, Price PA, Stasulli NM, Goldman WE. Early host cell targets of Yersinia pestis during primary pneumonic plague. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003679.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Sivaraman V, Pechous RD, Stasulli NM, Eichelberger KR, Miao EA, Goldman WE. Yersinia pestis activates both IL-1β and IL-1 receptor antagonist to modulate lung inflammation during pneumonic plague. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004688.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Peters KN, Dhariwala MO, Hughes Hanks JM, Brown CR, Anderson DM. Early apoptosis of macrophages modulated by injection of Yersinia pestis YopK promotes progression of primary pneumonic plague. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003324.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Pechous RD, Sivaraman V, Stasulli NM, Goldman WE. Pneumonic plague: the darker side of Yersinia pestis. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:190–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Stasulli NM, Eichelberger KR, Price PA, Pechous RD, Montgomery SA, Parker JS, et al. Spatially distinct neutrophil responses within the inflammatory lesions of pneumonic plague. mBio. 2015;6:e01530–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Vagima Y, Zauberman A, Levy Y, Gur D, Tidhar A, Aftalion M, et al. Circumventing Y. pestis virulence by early recruitment of neutrophils to the lungs during pneumonic plague. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004893.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Pachulec E, Abdelwahed Bagga RB, Chevallier L, O’Donnell H, Guillas C, Jaubert J, et al. Enhanced macrophage M1 polarization and resistance to apoptosis enable resistance to plague. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:761–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Littman DR, Rudensky AY. Th17 and regulatory T cells in mediating and restraining inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:845–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Bi Y, Zhou J, Yang H, Wang X, Zhang X, Wang Q, et al. IL-17A produced by neutrophils protects against pneumonic plague through orchestrating IFN-γ-activated macrophage programming. J Immunol. 2014;192:704–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Lin JS, Kummer LW, Szaba FM, Smiley ST. IL-17 contributes to cell-mediated defense against pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection. J Immunol. 2011;186:1675–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Pasztoi M, Bonifacius A, Pezoldt J, Kulkarni D, Niemz J, Yang J, et al. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis supports Th17 differentiation and limits de novo regulatory T cell induction by directly interfering with T cell receptor signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:2839–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Feodorova VA, Lyapina AM, Khizhnyakova MA, Zaitsev SS, Sayapina LV, Arseneva TE, et al. Humoral and cellular immune responses to Yersinia pestis Pla antigen in humans immunized with live plague vaccine. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006511.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Derbise A, Hanada Y, Khalifé M, Carniel E, Demeure CE. Complete protection against pneumonic and bubonic plague after a single oral vaccination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004162.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Chiuchiolo MJ, Boyer JL, Krause A, Senina S, Hackett NR, Crystal RG. Protective immunity against respiratory tract challenge with Yersinia pestis in mice immunized with an adenovirus-based vaccine vector expressing V antigen. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1249–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Heath DG, Anderson GW, Mauro JM, Welkos SL, Andrews GP, Adamovicz J, et al. Protection against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague by a recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine. Vaccine. 1998;16:1131–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Osorio JE, Powell TD, Frank RS, Moss K, Haanes EJ, Smith SR, et al. Recombinant raccoon pox vaccine protects mice against lethal plague. Vaccine. 2003;21:1232–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Williamson ED, Eley SM, Griffin KF, Green M, Russell P, Leary SE, et al. A new improved sub-unit vaccine for plague: the basis of protection. FEMS Immunol & Med Microbiol. 1995;12:223–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Smiley ST. Current challenges in the development of vaccines for pneumonic plague. Expert Rev Vaccin. 2008;7:209–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    WHO. Efficacy trials of plague vaccines: endpoints, trial design, site selection. WHO workshop in Paris, 2018. Available at Accessed Jan 2019.

  114. 114.

    FDA. Code of federal regulations. Title 21 (7), Chapter 1F-Biologics. Part 601: Licensing, subpart H: Approval of biological products when human efficacy studies are not ethical or feasible. Revised 2018.

  115. 115.

    Cornelius CA, Quenee LE, Overheim KA, Koster F, Brasel TL, Elli D, et al. Immunization with recombinant V10 protects cynomolgus macaques from lethal pneumonic plague. Infect Immun. 2008;76:5588–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Simonet M, Berche P, Mazigh D, Veron M. Protection against Yersinia infection induced by non-virulence-plasmid-encoded antigens. J Med Microbiol. 1985;20:225–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Taylor VL. Oral immunization with a dam mutant of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis protects against plague. Microbiology. 2005;151:1919–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    WHO. International meeting on preventing and controlling plague: the old calamity still has a future. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006;28:278–84.

    Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Stokell JR, Khan A, Steck TR. Mechanical homogenization increases bacterial homogeneity in sputum. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2340–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Chanteau S, Rahalison L, Ralafiarisoa L, Foulon J, Ratsitorahina M, Ratsifasoamanana L, et al. Development and testing of a rapid diagnostic test for bubonic and pneumonic plague. Lancet. 2003;361:211–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Hinnebusch J, Schwan TG. New method for plague surveillance using polymerase chain reaction to detect Yersinia pestis in fleas. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:1511–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Tsukano H, Itoh K, Suzuki S, Watanabe H. Detection and identification of Yersinia pestis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using multiplex primers. Microbiol Immunol. 1996;40:773–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Parkhill J, Wren BW, Thomson NR, Titball RW, Holden MT, Prentice MB, et al. Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague. Nature. 2001;413:523–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Loiez C, Herwegh S, Wallet F, Armand S, Guinet F, Courcol RJ. Detection of Yersinia pestis in Sputum by Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4873–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Hänsch S, Cilli E, Catalano G, Gruppioni G, Bianucci R, Stenseth NC, et al. The pla gene, encoding plasminogen activator, is not specific to Yersinia pestis. BMC Research Notes. 2015;8(535):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Riehm JM, Rahalison L, Scholz HC, Thoma B, Pfeffer M, Razanakoto LM, et al. Molecular and cellular probes. Mol Cell Probes. 2011;25:8–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Simonet M, Riot B, Fortineau N, Berche P. Invasin production by Yersinia pestis is abolished by insertion of an IS200-like element within the inv gene. Infect Immun. 1995;64:375–9.

    Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Matero P, Pasanen T, Laukkanen-Ninios R, Tissari P, Tarkka E, Vaara M, et al. Real-time multiplex PCR assay for detection of Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. APMIS. 2009;117:34–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Mölsä M, Hemmilä H, Katz A, Niemimaa J, Forbes KM, Huitu O, et al. Journal of microbiological methods. J Microbiol Methods. 2015;115:89–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Feng N, Zhou Y, Fan Y, Bi Y, Yang R, Zhou Y, et al. Yersinia pestis detection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with magnetic bead capture of DNA. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:128–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    WHO. How to safely collect sputum samples from patients suspected to be infected with pneumonic plague. 2016. Technical Guidance.

  132. 132.

    Tourdjman M, Ibraheem M, Brett M, DeBess E, Progulske B, Ettestad P, et al. Misidentification of Yersinia pestis by automated systems, resulting in delayed diagnoses of human plague infections—Oregon and New Mexico, 2010–2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:e58–e60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Benavides-Montaño JA, Vadyvaloo V. Yersinia pestis resists predation by acanthamoeba castellanii and exhibits prolonged intracellular survival. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83.

  134. 134.

    Markman DW, Antolin MF, Bowen RA, Wheat WH, Woods M, Gonzalez-Juarrero M, et al. Yersinia pestis survival and replication in potential ameba reservoir. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:294–302.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    D’Ortenzio E, Lemaître N, Brouat C, Loubet P, Sebbane F, Rajerison M, et al. Plague: bridging gaps towards a better disease control. Med Et Mal Infect. 2018;48:307–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank colleagues from the Institut Pasteur and particularly from the Yersinia Research Unit for critical reading of this paper. Due to space limitations, we apologize to those authors whose work was not cited in this article.


We acknowledge funding from Institut Pasteur, Direction Générale de l’Armement, l’Agence Innovation Défense, l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR10-LBX-62 IBEID, ANR18-ASTR-004-01), and Université Paris-Diderot.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Pizarro-Cerdá.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demeure, C.E., Dussurget, O., Mas Fiol, G. et al. Yersinia pestis and plague: an updated view on evolution, virulence determinants, immune subversion, vaccination, and diagnostics. Genes Immun 20, 357–370 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links