Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Using a combination of peripapillary atrophy area and choroidal thickness for the prediction of different types of myopic maculopathy

Abstract

Purpose

To analyse the topographic characteristics in macular choroidal thickness (mChT) and ocular biometry in myopic maculopathy and to explore the potential cut-off value for prediction of myopic maculopathy (MM).

Methods

All participants underwent detailed ocular examinations. MM was subdivided into thin choroid, Bruch’s membrane (BM) defects, choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and myopic tractional maculopathy (MTM) according to OCT-based classification system. Peripapillary atrophy area (PPA), tilt ratio, torsion, and mChT were individually measured.

Results

A total of 1947 participants were included. In multivariate logistics models, older age, longer axial length, larger PPA area, and thinner average mChT were more likely to have MM and different type of MM. Female participants were more likely to have MM and BM defects. A lower tilt ratio was more likely to be associated with CNV and MTM. The area under the curve (AUC) of single tilt ratio, PPA area, torsion, and topographic of mChT for MM, thin choroid, BM Defects, CNV, and MTM were 0.6581 to 0.9423, 0.6564 to 0.9335, 0.6120 to 0.9554, 0.5734 to 0.9312, 0.6415 to 0.9382, respectively. After combining PPA area and average mChT for predicting MM, thin choroid, BM defects, CNV, and MTM, the AUC of the combination were 0.9678, 0.9279, 0.9531, 0.9213, 0.9317, respectively.

Conclusion

Progressive and continuous PPA area expanding and thin choroid play a role in the development of myopic maculopathy. The present study showed that a combination of peripapillary atrophy area and the choroidal thickness could be used to predict MM and each type of MM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Representative fundus photographs and swept-source OCT image for each type of MM.
Fig. 2: The Topographic characteristics of macular choroid layer thickness in all sectors.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Correspondence and requests for data materials should be addressed to Jia He.

References

  1. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw S-M. Myopia. Lancet 2012;379:1739–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolgin E. The Myopia Boom. Nature. 2015;519:276–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1036–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Huang W, Gao Y, Luo Y, et al. Prevalence and Causes of Visual Impairment in a Chinese Adult Population: The Taizhou Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1480–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fricke TR, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath TJ, Ho SM, et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102:855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu W-M, Cheng C-Y, Liu J-H, Tsai S-Y, Chou P. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:62–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verhoeven VJM, Wong KT, Buitendijk GHS, Hofman A, Vingerling JR, Klaver CCW. Visual consequences of refractive errors in the general population. Ophthalmology 2015;122:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buch H, Vinding T, Cour ML, Appleyard M, Jensen GB, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among 9980 Scandinavian adults - The Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao X, Ding X, Lyu C, Li S, Liu B, Li T, et al. Morphological Characteristics and Visual Acuity of Highly Myopic Eyes with Different Severities of Myopic Maculopathy. Retina. 2020;40:461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB, Cheung CMG, Saw S-M, Verhoeven VJM, et al. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:877–83-e877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang Y, Du R, Nagaoka N, Yokoi T, Shinohara K, Xu X, et al. OCT-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Different Stages of Myopic Maculopathy. Ophthalmology 2019;126(Jul):1018–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruiz-Medrano J, Montero JA, Flores-Moreno I, Arias L, García-Layana A, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Myopic maculopathy: Current status and proposal for a new classification and grading system (ATN). Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;69:80–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang Y, Yokoi T, Nagaoka N, Shinohara K, Onishi Y, Ishida T, et al. Progression of Myopic Maculopathy during 18-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology 2018;125:863–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Q, He J, Hu G, Xu X, Lv H, Yin Y, et al. Morphological Characteristics and Risk Factors of Myopic Maculopathy in an Older High Myopia Population-Based on the New Classification System (ATN). Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;208(Dec):356–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie J, Ye L, Chen Q, Shi Y, Hu G, Yin Y, et al. Choroidal thickness and its association with age, axial length, and refractive error in chinese adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(Feb):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. L Ye, Q Chen, G Hu, Y Shi, G Hu, Y Yin, et al. Distribution and association of visual impairment with myopic maculopathy across age groups among highly myopic eyes - based on the new classification system (ATN). Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100:e957–67.

  17. Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF. Improvements on Littmann’s method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:361–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu G, Chen Q, Xu X, Lv H, Du Y, Wang L, et al. Morphological Characteristics of the Optic Nerve Head and Choroidal Thickness in High Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(Apr):46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong Y-L, Sabanayagam C, Ding Y, Wong CW, Yeo AC, Cheung Y-B, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Myopic Macular Degeneration on Visual Impairment and Functioning Among Adults in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:4603–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopf S, Korb C, Nickels S, Schulz A, Münzel T, Wild PS, et al. Prevalence of myopic maculopathy in the German population: results from the Gutenberg health study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(Sep):1254–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai Y, Jonas JB, Huang H, Wang M, Sun X. Microstructure of parapapillary atrophy: beta zone and gamma zone. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2013–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vianna JR, Malik R, Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, Belliveau AC, Shuba LM, et al. Beta and Gamma Peripapillary Atrophy in Myopic Eyes With and Without Glaucoma. Investigative Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2016;57:3103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim M, Choung H-K, Lee KM, Oh S, Kim SH. Longitudinal Changes of Optic Nerve Head and Peripapillary Structure during Childhood Myopia Progression on OCT: Boramae Myopia Cohort Study Report 1. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Almeida I, Ushida M, Lins I, Dias DT, Prata TS. Peripapillary Atrophy in Myopic Eyes: Comparison of Gamma to Beta Zone Ratio Between Those With and Without Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(Nov):6031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jonas JB, Wang YX, Zhang Q, Fan YY, Xu L, Wei WB, et al. Parapapillary Gamma Zone and Axial Elongation-Associated Optic Disc Rotation: The Beijing Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:396–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohno-Matsui K, Jonas JB, Spaide RF. Macular Bruch’s Membrane Holes in Highly Myopic Patchy Chorioretinal Atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;166:22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tay E, Seah SK, Chan S-P, Lim ATH, Chew S-J, Foster PJ, et al. Optic disk ovality as an index of tilt and its relationship to myopia and perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. How ACS, Tan GSW, Chan Y-H, Wong TTL, Seah SK, Foster PJ, et al. Population prevalence of tilted and torted optic discs among an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:894–9.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim T-W, Kim M, Weinreb RN, Woo SJ, Park KH, Hwang J-M. Optic disc change with incipient myopia of childhood. Ophthalmology 2012;119:21–6-e1-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Samarawickrama C, Mitchell P, Tong L, Gazzard G, Lim L, Wong T-Y, et al. Myopia-related optic disc and retinal changes in adolescent children from singapore. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2050–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neelam K, Cheung CG, Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Wong TY. Choroidal neovascularization in pathological myopia. Prog retinal eye Res. 2012;31:495–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:9–25-e12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Shanghai Public Health System Three-Year Plan Personnel Construction Subjects (Project No.GWV-10.2-YQ40, GWV-10.1-XK7) Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Clinical Research Program (Project No. SHDC12019X18). The sponsors or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research. The authors had no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this manuscript. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JH, LY, CC, QC, DS, JX, YF, JZ, XX, and JH were involved in the study design and conduct. JH, GH, YS, QC, YY, LY, HZ, and JH were involved in data collection, management, and analysis. JH and LY interpreted the data. JH, LY, QC, and YF were involved in manuscript preparation, review, or approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

The study was designed following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethical committee of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Ye, L., Chu, C. et al. Using a combination of peripapillary atrophy area and choroidal thickness for the prediction of different types of myopic maculopathy. Eye 37, 2801–2809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02423-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02423-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links