Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Risk of acute angle-closure and changes in intraocular pressure after pupillary dilation in patients with diabetes

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the risk of AAC and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in diabetic patients after pupil dilation.

Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled 2,287 diabetic patients among community residents in Guangzhou, China. All participants underwent routine pupil dilation unless they had a history of glaucoma. IOP was measured using a non-contact tonometer before and one hour after pupil dilation with tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 0.5% eye drop. The proportion of AAC and changes in IOP after pupil dilation were evaluated.

Results

Only one of the 2,287 participants (0.04%) with diabetes developed post-dilation AAC. The mean pre and post-dilation IOP in the right was 16.1 ± 2.7 and 16.5 ± 2.8 mmHg (P < 0.001); mean pre and post-dilation IOP in the left was 16.5 ± 2.7 and 16.8 ± 2.8 mmHg (P < 0.001). Sixty-one participants (2.7%) showed an increase in IOP ≥ 5 mmHg and 25 participants (1.1%) showed a post-dilation IOP > 25 mmHg, including 11 participants (0.5%) who had both an increase in IOP ≥ 5 mmHg and post-dilation IOP > 25 mmHg. Lower pre-dilation IOP (OR = 0.827; 95% CI, 0.742–0.922; P = 0.001) and shallower anterior chamber depth (ACD) (OR = 0.226; 95% CI, 0.088–0.585; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for an increase in IOP ≥ 5 mmHg in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The risk of developing AAC after pupil dilation in diabetic patients was very low. Lower pre-dilation IOP and shallower ACD are risk factors for increased post-dilation IOP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distribution of anterior chamber depth and intraocular pressure in both eyes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ting DS, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44:260–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Meuer SM, Brothers RJ. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985;92:485–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan CETBES Patterns of medical care for diabetics in the san francisco bay area. atlanta: centers for disease control. Diabetes Care. 1999.

  4. Shaw BR, Lewis RA. Intraocular pressure elevation after pupillary dilation in open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol (1960). 1986;104:1185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hancox J, Murdoch I, Parmar D. Changes in intraocular pressure following diagnostic mydriasis with cyclopentolate 1%. Eye (Lond). 2002;16:562–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris LS. Cycloplegic-induced intraocular pressure elevations a study of normal and open-angle glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;79:242–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yip JLY, Foster PJ. Ethnic differences in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Curr opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:175–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1277–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saw SM, Wong TY, Ting S, Foong AW, Foster PJ. The relationship between anterior chamber depth and the presence of diabetes in the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:325–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel KH, Javitt JC, Tielsch JM, Street DA, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Incidence of acute angle-closure glaucoma after pharmacologic mydriasis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:709–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liew G, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Fundoscopy: to dilate or not to dilate? BMJ 2006;332:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfs RC, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Risk of acute angle-closure glaucoma after diagnostic mydriasis in nonselected subjects: the Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:2683–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan GS, Wong CY, Wong TY, Govindasamy CV, Wong ZY, Yeo LY, et al. Is routine pupil dilation safe among asian patients with diabetes? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4110–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavanya R, Baskaran M, Kumar RS, Wong HT, Chew PT, Foster PJ, et al. Risk of acute angle closure and changes in intraocular pressure after pupillary dilation in asian subjects with narrow angles. Ophthalmology 2012;119:474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Niu M, Li Y, Wang J, Qu B, Zheng CX, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in hospital patients. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;98:440–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes res Clin Pr. 2019;157:107843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiang YP, Bassi LJ, Javitt JC. Federal budgetary costs of blindness. Milbank Q 1992;70:319–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Preferred Practice Pattern(R). Ophthalmology 2020;127:P66–P145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagan MA, O’Gallagher MK, Johnston SE, Hart PM. Angle closure glaucoma in the Northern Ireland Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme. Eye (Lond). 2016;30:1091–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cabrera JV, Mozos PE, Sanchez JG, Rodriguez FB. Changes in intraocular pressure due to cycloplegia. Clao J. 1998;24:111–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiederholt M, Thieme H, Stumpff F. The regulation of trabecular meshwork and ciliary muscle contractility. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:271–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamada R, Hirose F, Matsuki T, Kameda T, Kurimoto Y. Comparison of mydriatic provocative and dark room prone provocative tests for anterior chamber angle configuration. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ko Y, Kuo C, Kuang T, Chen W, Chou P, Liu CJ. Determinants of post-mydriatic intraocular pressure in phakic eyes with prevalent angle closure diseases. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:137–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao M, Sun Q, Oatts J, Hu GY, Ge L, Zhu BJ, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and angle structure after dilation in primary angle-closure suspects with visually significant cataract. Ophthalmology 2021;128:39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Ramesh SV, Raju P, Arvind H, et al. Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma: a population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:399–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sihota R, Lakshmaiah NC, Agarwal HC, Pandey RM, Titiyal JS. Ocular parameters in the subgroups of angle closure glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;28:253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1277–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was completed using data from the Guangzhou Diabetic Eye Study. This study is a cohort study of patients with diabetes in the community, Guangzhou. Thanks very much to all the Department of Preventive Ophthalmology staff and participants in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82000901), the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (303060202400362). The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: WH, KX, WL, LW, and JH. Administrative support: WH. Provision of study materials or patients: WH. Collection and assembly of data: KX, WW. Manuscript writing: All authors. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to JingJing Huang or Wenyong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, K., Wang, L., Li, W. et al. Risk of acute angle-closure and changes in intraocular pressure after pupillary dilation in patients with diabetes. Eye 37, 1646–1651 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02215-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02215-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links