Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Does progression in keratoconus have to be witnessed by the hospital eye service for it to have occurred?

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    O’Brart D, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Vasquez-Perez A, Liu C. Comment on: “What are the costs, capacity, and clinical implications of “waiting for documented progression” in young West of Scotland patients prior to collagen cross linking?”. Eye. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01704-w.

  2. 2.

    Simpson A, Brogan K, Ramaesh K, Lockington D. What are the costs, capacity, and clinical implications of ‘waiting for documented progression’ in young West of Scotland patients prior to collagen cross linking? Eye. 2021;35:1808–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01444-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Koppen C. Identifying Eyes That Can Benefit From Cross-linking Is Mostly a Question of Clinical Judgment. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;47:485. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Larkin DFP, Chowdhury K, Burr JM, Raynor M, Edwards M, Tuft SJ, et al. KERALINK Trial Study Group. Effect of Corneal Cross-linking versus Standard Care on Keratoconus Progression in Young Patients: The KERALINK Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.019.

  5. 5.

    Moran S, Gomez L, Zuber K, Gatinel D. A case-control study of keratoconus risk factors. Cornea 2020;39:697–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ferdi AC, Nguyen V, Gore DM, Allan BD, Rozema JJ, Watson SL. Keratoconus natural progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 529 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:935–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.02.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lockington.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lockington, D., Simpson, A., Brogan, K. et al. Does progression in keratoconus have to be witnessed by the hospital eye service for it to have occurred?. Eye (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01792-8

Download citation

Search

Quick links