Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comment on: are school textbooks misleading?

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Anatomy of the eye.
Fig. 2: Anatomy of the eye.


  1. Wood MT, Wood SA, Corbett MC. Are school textbooks misleading? Eye. 2020;34:989–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tariq F, Loutfi M, Ghouri N, Watts M. Survey of current undergraduate ophthalmology teaching in the United Kingdom. Eye news, Pinpoint Ltd, Edinburgh (U.K). Vol. 26:(3) October/November 2019.

  3. Naish J, Court DS. Medical sciences. 3rd ed. Elsevier London. 14th August 2018. Section 8: Page 381.

  4. Fullick A, Bircher P, Locke J. A level Biology for OCR. UK: Oxford University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P Gannon. GCSE AQA Biology for the Grade 9-1 Course. Coordination Group Publication Ltd. (CGP); 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasant Raman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raman, V. Comment on: are school textbooks misleading?. Eye 35, 3457–3458 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links