Abstract
Purpose
To identify the factors affecting the risk of bonded fragment loss in crown-fractured anterior teeth managed by fragment reattachment.
Methods
The study protocol followed the best practices of evidence-based medicine and was registered in PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was performed electronically in six databases (PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web-of-Science, Lilacs, and Cochrane) on 18-09-2023. It was saved in EndNote-online and duplicates were removed. Selection of articles was performed in two stages, followed by data-extraction, risk of bias assessment, data-analysis, and meta-analysis. The quality of evidence for the outcomes was assessed by the GRADE-approach.
Results
The study included six articles that had similar selection protocols with variations in duration from trauma to treatment and the observation period. Only one study employed pre-attachment fragment preparation and three performed post-attachment reinforcements. Overall loss of fragment was 20% (95%CI–13,30%). When the risk ratio for loss of restoration or fragment was compared, it was found to be 2.21 (95%CI–1.52,3.21) in uncomplicated crown fractures, 2.54 (95%CI–1.35,4.79) in complicated crown fractures. The risk of bias was found to be low in two and moderate in four studies. Grade of evidence for all the outcomes was very low.
Conclusion
Fragment loss was lowest in uncomplicated crown fractures where reinforcement had been performed, and highest when bonding was done in complicated crown fractures without reinforcement. The risk of fragment loss was higher than the loss of composite restorations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lam R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2016;61:4–20.
Bastone EB, Freer TJ, McNamara JR. Epidemiology of dental trauma: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2000;45:2–9.
Goyal N, Singh S, Mathur A, Makkar DK, Aggarwal VP, Sharma A, et al. Traumatic dental injuries prevalence and their impact on self-esteem among adolescents in india: a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC106–10.
Garcia FCP, Poubel DLN, Almeida JCF, Toledo IP, Poi WR, Guerra ENS, et al. Tooth fragment reattachment techniques-A systematic review. Dent Traumatol. 2018;34:135–43.
Bourguignon C, Cohenca N, Lauridsen E, Flores MT, O’Connell AC, Day PF, et al. International association of dental traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. fractures and luxations. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36:314–30.
Andreasen FM, Norén JG, Andreasen JO. Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study. Pediat Dentist Quintessence Intern. 1995;26:669–81.
Brambilla GP, Cavallè E. Fractured incisors: a judicious restorative approach–part 1. Int Dent J. 2007;57:13–8.
Bona AD, Boscato N. Clinical evaluation of allografts and homografts for restoration of missing tooth structure. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:163–8.
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10:ED000142.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:380–2.
Yilmaz Y, Zehir C, Eyuboglu O, Belduz N. Evaluation of success in the reattachment of coronal fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:151–8.
Yilmaz Y, Guler C, Sahin H, Eyuboglu O. Evaluation of tooth-fragment reattachment: a clinical and laboratory study. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26:308–14.
Sarapultseva M, Sarapultsev A. Long-term results of crown fragment reattachment techniques for fractured anterior teeth: A retrospective case-control study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:290–4.
Bissinger R, Müller DD, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Survival analysis of adhesive reattachments in permanent teeth with crown fractures after dental trauma. Dent Traumatol. 2020;37:208–14.
Bissinger R, Müller DD, Reymus M, Khazaei Y, Hickel R, Bücher K, et al. Treatment outcomes after uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:133–43.
Haupt F, Meyerdiercks C, Kanzow P, Wiegand A. Survival analysis of fragment reattachments and direct composite restorations in permanent teeth after dental traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2023;39:49–56.
de Sousa APBR, França K, de Lucas Rezende LVM, do Nascimento Poubel DL, Almeida JCF, de Toledo IP, et al. In vitro tooth reattachment techniques: A systematic review. Dent Traumatol. 2018;34:297–310.
Diangelis AJ, Andreasen JO, Ebeleseder KA, Kenny DJ, Trope M, Sigurdsson A, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:2–12.
Flores MT, Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Bakland LK, Malmgren B, Barnett F, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology. Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. I. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23:66–71.
Flores MT, Andreasen JO, Bakland LK. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of traumatic dental injuries. Dental Traumatology. 2001;17:97–102.
Chazine M, Sedda M, Ounsi HF, Paragliola R, Ferrari M, Grandini S. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques. Dent Traumatol. 2011;27:15–8.
Demarco FF, Fay R-M, Pinzon LM, Powers JM. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments–influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20:157–63.
Karre D, Muppa R, Duddu MK, Nallachakrava S. Fracture resistance of reattached fragments using three different techniques with emphasis on vertical grooves and fiber-reinforced composite post: A novel technique. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:474–8.
Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriques Filho LE. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent. 2001;26:287–94.
Chan KHS, Mai Y, Kim H, Tong KCT, Ng D, Hsiao JCM. Review: resin composite filling. Materials (Basel). 2010;3:1228–43.
Kwon JH, Park HC, Zhu T, Yang H-C. Inhibition of odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp cells by dental resin monomers. Biomaterials Research. 2015;19:2–7.
Madhubala A, Tewari N, Mathur VP, Bansal K. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance using two rehydration protocols for fragment reattachment in uncomplicated crown fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2019;35:199–203.
Rajput A, Ataide I, Lambor R, Monteiro J, Tar M, Wadhawan N. In vitro study comparing fracture strength recovery of teeth restored with three esthetic bonding materials using different techniques. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010;5:398–411.
Lauridsen E, Hermann NV, Gerds TA, Kreiborg S, Andreasen JO. Pattern of traumatic dental injuries in the permanent dentition among children, adolescents, and adults. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:358–63.
Lauridsen E, Hermann NV, Gerds TA, Ahrensburg SS, Kreiborg S, Andreasen JO. Combination injuries 3. The risk of pulp necrosis in permanent teeth with extrusion or lateral luxation and concomitant crown fractures without pulp exposure. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:379–85.
Robertson A, Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO, Norén JG. Long-term prognosis of crown-fractured permanent incisors. The effect of stage of root development and associated luxation injury. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000;10:191–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The idea was conceptualized by NT and ZC. The team comprising all the co-authors designed the protocol and the methods of the study. The extraction of data was conducted by NT and MA. The steps of analysis were conducted by NT, MR, MA, AA, ZC, and PH. The initial draft of the manuscript was prepared by NT, ZC. It was revised by all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tewari, N., Cehreli, Z., Haldar, P. et al. The risk of bonded fragment loss in crown-fractured anterior teeth managed by fragment reattachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01003-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01003-9