Abstract
Design
An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dental autotransplantation (DAT).
Aim
To provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications of DAT by synthesizing the evidence.
Methods
A comprehensive search of six databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to June 30, 2022. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Raw data from primary studies were analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression was performed to investigate the effect of open and closed apices on the outcomes.
Results
Ten systematic reviews, of which nine included meta-analyses, were examined. The overall success rate of the studies was 89.4%, and the survival rate was 96.1%. The main complications were ankylosis (4.6%) and root resorption (7.4%). The analysis showed that a closed apex increased the proportion of ankylosis, resorption, and reduced survival but had no effect on success. The quality of the systematic reviews included varied, with 20% scoring moderate, 60% scoring low, and 20% scoring critically low on the AMSTAR 2 scale.
Conclusions
Dental implant therapy is a reliable solution for replacing lost or damaged teeth, with high success and survival rates. However, it is a procedure that requires precision and attention to detail, along with careful selection of suitable candidates, comprehensive planning, and consideration of factors that may impact outcomes. To improve results and reduce potential complications, it is essential to establish standard clinical guidelines and conduct further extensive research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Cremona M, Bister D, Sherriff M, Abela S. Prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications for dental autotransplantation: an umbrella review. Eur J Orthod. 2024;46:cjad067. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad067.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mourão, C.F., Resende, R. Dental autotransplantation: a viable solution for preserving oral health and function. Evid Based Dent (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01002-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01002-w