Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Oral health

Dental autotransplantation: a viable solution for preserving oral health and function

Abstract

Design

An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dental autotransplantation (DAT).

Aim

To provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications of DAT by synthesizing the evidence.

Methods

A comprehensive search of six databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to June 30, 2022. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Raw data from primary studies were analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression was performed to investigate the effect of open and closed apices on the outcomes.

Results

Ten systematic reviews, of which nine included meta-analyses, were examined. The overall success rate of the studies was 89.4%, and the survival rate was 96.1%. The main complications were ankylosis (4.6%) and root resorption (7.4%). The analysis showed that a closed apex increased the proportion of ankylosis, resorption, and reduced survival but had no effect on success. The quality of the systematic reviews included varied, with 20% scoring moderate, 60% scoring low, and 20% scoring critically low on the AMSTAR 2 scale.

Conclusions

Dental implant therapy is a reliable solution for replacing lost or damaged teeth, with high success and survival rates. However, it is a procedure that requires precision and attention to detail, along with careful selection of suitable candidates, comprehensive planning, and consideration of factors that may impact outcomes. To improve results and reduce potential complications, it is essential to establish standard clinical guidelines and conduct further extensive research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cremona M, Bister D, Sherriff M, Abela S. Prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications for dental autotransplantation: an umbrella review. Eur J Orthod. 2024;46:cjad067. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjad067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Fernando Mourão.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mourão, C.F., Resende, R. Dental autotransplantation: a viable solution for preserving oral health and function. Evid Based Dent (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01002-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01002-w

Search

Quick links