Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Endodontics

Regenerative endodontic procedures: are they more successful in mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp than in immature teeth?

Abstract

Data sources

Five scientific databases were electronically searched: PubMed, EMBASE, OpenGrey, Web of Science and Cochrane Library.  The search was conducted until 17 February 2022 without any restriction on date of publication but was restricted to English language. Relevant studies were also screened for related publications. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) in mature and immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp and to evaluate if the success rate was affected by the stage of root development.

Study selection

Types of studies: all of the included studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Types of participants: people with necrotic permanent teeth (immature or mature) treated with regenerative endodontic procedures. Types of interventions: regenerative endodontic procedures. Language: RCTs published in English.

Exclusion criteria

Types of studies: (1) case reports, (2) retrospective cohort trials, (3) prospective cohort trials, (4) animal trials, (5) in-vitro trials, (6) non-randomised trials. Population: primary teeth. Types of interventions: no details about the clinical procedures. Follow-up period: <6 months.

Data extraction and synthesis

The titles and abstracts of the RCTs identified by the search strategies were independently screened by two reviewers. After the initial screening, the full text of the relevant trials were reassessed against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies and disagreements were resolved by consensus after including a third reviewer.

Results

Following the initial electronic and manual searches, a total of 3766 articles were initially identified. This was reduced to 2739 articles after duplicates were removed. However, after the initial screening phase, 35 articles were considered potentially relevant and qualified for full-text scrutiny. Out of the 35 articles, only 27 were considered eligible for inclusion. The differences in the success rate and the asymptomatic rate between the mature and immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp were not statistically significant. However, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant in the rate of positive response to electrical pulp testing.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors concluded that REPs are an effective therapy and can achieve high success rates for both mature and immature necrotic permanent teeth. It was also concluded that the REPs were more successful in regaining vitality responses for mature compared with immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Diogenes A, Simon S, Law AS. Regenerative endodontics. In: Haegreaves KM, Berman LH, editors. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016. p. 447–73.

  2. American Association of Endodontists (AAE) (2016) Clinical Considerations for a Regenerative Procedure. Revised 2018. https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/06/ConsiderationsForRegEndo_AsOfApril2018.pdf.

  3. Murad M, Duggal MS. Intra-canal Antibiotic Pastes May Promote Thicker Dentin Walls And Calcium Hydroxide May Promote More Apical Closure. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22:101728 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lovelace TW, Henry MA, Hargreaves KM, Diogenes A. Evaluation of the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells into the root canal space of necrotic immature teeth after clinical regenerative endodontic procedure. J Endod. 2011;37:133–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galler KM, Krastl G, Simon S, Van Gorp G, Meschi N, Vahedi B, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Revitalization procedures. Int Endod J. 2016;49:717–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrepa V, Henry MA, Daniel BJ, Diogenes A. Delivery of Apical Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Root Canals of Mature Teeth. J Dent Res. 2015;94:1653–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515596527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Murad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murad, M., Cooper, P.R. Regenerative endodontic procedures: are they more successful in mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp than in immature teeth?. Evid Based Dent 24, 125–126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00916-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00916-1

Search

Quick links