Abstract
Objective
To collect evidence on the ability of artificial intelligence programs to accurately make extraction decisions in orthodontic treatment planning.
Data sources
Authors electronically searched the following databases: PubMed/ MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, Computers & Applied Science, ACM Digital Library, and Compendex, Open Grey, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis.
Study selection
Three independent reviewers collected the following data: number of cases of extraction and non-extraction, number of experts in orthodontics and their years of experience, number of variables used in the index model test, type of artificial intelligence and algorithms, accuracy outcomes, the three highest variable ranks weighted in the computational model, and the main conclusion.
Data extraction and synthesis
Risk of bias was assessed using Quadas 2 checklist for AI, and certainty of evidence was evaluated by GRADE.
Results
After 2 phases of screening by 3 independent reviewers, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria for the final review. The AI programs used by the included studies were as follows: ensemble learning/random forest, artificial neural network/multilayer perceptron, machine learning/back propagation and machine learning/feature vectors. All studies showed an unclear risk of bias for patient selection. Two studies had high risk of bias in the index test, while two others presented an unclear risk of bias in the diagnostic test. Meta-analysis of the pooled data resulted in 0.87 accuracy value for all studies.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that AI’s ability to predict extractions is promising but should be interpreted with caution.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
13 March 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00876-6
References
Jacox LA, Mihas P, Cho C, Lin FC, Ko CC. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:432–42.
González AM, Calatayud LR, d’Oliveira NG, Ustrell-Torrent JM. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: where are we now? A scoping review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24:6–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thirumoorthy, S., Gopal, S. Diagnostic accuracy of AI in orthodontic extraction decisions: “Are we ready to let Mr. Data run our Enterprise?” A commentary on a systematic review. Evid Based Dent 24, 17–18 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00865-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00865-9