Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Summary Review
  • Published:

Are orthodontic decisions consistent?

Evidence-Based Dentistry volume 23, pages 120–121 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to analyse published literature related to clinical decisions made by practising orthodontists.

Methods A modified approach for reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was adopted for this review. A total of 20 articles were identified containing 53 datasets related to clinical decisions, such as treatment needs, extractions, surgery, or specific approaches. Once the random effect models were prepared, meta-regression was utilised to study the distribution, prevalence and professional experience.

Results In total, 25% variance was observed between orthodontists and 33% among orthodontists using identical records to make the same treatment decisions. It was also observed that raters were more in agreement on the presence of certain conditions rather than their absence. Orthodontic residents were found to be more consistent in their decision-making process when compared to students or orthodontists.

Conclusion It was observed from the findings of this study that there was low consistency in the clinical decisions being made by orthodontists using common records. One of the reasons that could be responsible for this finding was the presence of established mental frameworks among orthodontists.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luke L S, Atchison K A, White S C. Consistency of patient classification in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 513-520.

  2. Tilden V P, Tilden S. Benner, P (1984). From novice to expert, excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 307 pp., $12.95 (soft cover). Res Nurs Health 1985; 8: 95-97.

  3. Chambers D W. Dentists' knowledge of ADA code. J Am Coll Dent 2020; 87: 26-34.

  4. Erber R, Fiske S T. Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984; 47: 709-726.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Head of the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, 12211, Cambodia

    Anand Marya

Authors
  1. Anand Marya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marya, A. Are orthodontic decisions consistent?. Evid Based Dent 23, 120–121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0807-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0807-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links