Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Summary Review
  • Published:

Do composite restorations in primary molar teeth have a higher survival rate following total or selective caries removal?

Evidence-Based Dentistry volume 22, pages 38–39 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Study design A double-blind randomised clinical trial, conducted between June 2009 and June 2011, in a paediatric dental department in a Brazilian dental school.

Study selection Children aged 3-8 years, in good general health, with deep carious lesions (caries radiographically located in the inner quarter of dentine) affecting either one or two surfaces in primary molars were eligible for inclusion. Teeth were excluded if clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpal inflammation or necrosis or clinical mobility were observed. Pre-cooperative children were also excluded.

Clinical procedures and success criteria Following a coin toss, 120 teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: 55 in the total caries removal (TCR) group and 65 in the selective caries removal (SCR) group. Procedures were carried out by three paediatric dentists under local anaesthesia and restored, using a layering technique, with composite under rubber dam. Restorations were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months, using the US Public Health Service (USPHS) scale, by a single-blinded and calibrated examiner. A Charlie or Delta score, on the USPHS scale, at the margins of the restorations was considered as restoration failure. Gingival bleeding score, type of cavity (one or two surfaces) and presence of caries (active or inactive) were recorded as secondary outcomes; however, presence alone did not constitute restoration failure.

Results Average survival rate of restorations across all teeth was 68% after 36 months, with SCR statistically significantly lower at 57% compared to TCR at 81% (p = 0.004). Annual failure rates for SCR and TCR were 17.3% and 6.7%, respectively. Two-surface restorations had lower survival rates (58%) compared to single-surface restorations (87%) (p = 0.02). Type of cavity and gingival bleeding statistically influenced the chance of restoration failure at 36 months.

Conclusions Composite restorations placed after SCR in primary molars were found to fail more often compared to those restored after TCR. Two-surface cavities and poor gingival health negatively impacted restoration success.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maguire A, Clarkson J E, Douglas G V et al. Best-practice prevention alone or with conventional or biological caries management for 3-to 7-year-olds: the FiCTION three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24: 1-174.

  2. Schwendicke F. Contemporary concepts in carious tissue removal: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 403-408.

  3. Franzon R, Guimarães L F, Magalhães C E, Haas A N, Araujo F B. Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial. Caries Res 2014; 48: 376-383.

  4. Rodd H D, Waterhouse P J, Fuks A B, Fayle S A, Moffat M A, British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16(Suppl 1): 15-23.

  5. Cvar J F, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1971.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dental Core Trainee (DCT2) in Paediatric Dentistry, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Rachel Goldsmith

  2. NIHR Doctoral Research Fellow/StR in Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Greig Taylor

  3. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Senior Lecturer/Honorary Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Paula Waterhouse

Authors
  1. Rachel Goldsmith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greig Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paula Waterhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldsmith, R., Taylor, G. & Waterhouse, P. Do composite restorations in primary molar teeth have a higher survival rate following total or selective caries removal?. Evid Based Dent 22, 38–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-021-0166-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-021-0166-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links