Dental disease risk in children with autism: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction Pi and colleagues reviewed eight case-control studies comparing the oral health (decayed, missing and filled teeth [DMFT], Plaque Index [PI], Gingival Index [GI] and salivary pH) of children with autism (n = 475) to children without autism (n = 565).

Method The search strategy involved the use of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal (VIP) to find case-control studies which met pre-defined inclusion criteria and were published before September 2018. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale and only high-quality studies were included. Means and standard deviations for outcomes measured by each included study were presented. Data were pooled using the random-effects model via Review Manager 5.3, and presented as mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Consistency was measured using I2. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing one study with a large sample to explore effects on heterogeneity.

Results The authors found eight eligible case-control studies conducted in Asia (n = 7) or South America (n = 1). Six of the eight compared DMFT of children with autism to those without and three of the eight compared PI, GI and/or salivary pH. While a meta-analysis is presented for each of the oral health outcome areas, there are discrepancies in the reporting. The included studies in each of the meta-analysis do not correspond with the characteristics of the studies provided.

Conclusions The authors suggest from their meta-analyses that children with autism experience a higher prevalence of dental disease than children without autism. However, as currently presented, the study lacks internal validity and findings are not reliable.