Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Summary Review
  • Published:

Limited evidence on differences between fixed appliances and clear aligners regarding pain level

Evidence-Based Dentistry volume 21, pages 144–145 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Design Systematic review for randomised and non-randomised studies.

Data sources Eight electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials and OpenGrey were searched without language or date restrictions during the search, in addition to hand-searching.

Study selection Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs and non-RCTs) and cross-sectional studies that compare pain levels between fixed appliances and clear aligners during orthodontic treatment in adults patients.

Data extraction and synthesis The reviewers followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The study selection was done by two reviewers. The reviewers assessed the risk of bias using three risk of bias tools (ROB.2 tool for RCTs, ROBINS-I tool for non-RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cross-sectional studies).

Results Seven studies were included in this review. Five studies were non-RCTs, one was an RCT and one study was a cross-sectional design. The risk of bias was moderate to high in the non-RCTs, low in the RCT and low for the cross-sectional study. All studies used the same type of aligners (Invisalign aligner) and they differed in the fixed appliance type and archwire sequences. However, meta-analysis was not possible. In the first 24 hours of treatment, four studies revealed that the pain is higher in the fixed appliance group. During days three and four, two studies reported a higher level of pain in a fixed appliance group. On days five to seven, only one study reported a higher level of pain in a fixed appliance group. On day 14, two studies evaluated pain levels and reported that there is no difference between the two groups.

Conclusions With low certainty, patients treated with clear aligners seems to have less pain perception than patients treated with conventional fixed appliances during the first days of treatment. There were no noticeable differences up to three months between the two groups. Furthermore, the malocclusion was not described in detail in the individual studies, which may play a role in pain level differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salvador-Olivan J A, Marco-Cuenca G, Arquero-Aviles R. Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. J Med Libr Assoc 2019; 107: 210-221.

  2. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D M, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 75: 40-46.

  3. Higgins J P T, Thomas J, Chandler J et al (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0. 2019. Available online at https://training.cochrane.org/cochrane-handbook-systematic-reviews-interventions (accessed November 2020).

  4. Cardoso P, Mecenas P, Gonzalez D, Normando D. A comparison of pain levels between aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. 2019. Available online at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019131359 (accessed November 2020).

  5. Wang Y, Liu C, Jian F et al. Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007859.pub4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Former instructor in Orthodontic Department, Syrian Ministry of Health, Private Practice, Damascus, Syria

    Samer Mheissen

  2. Associate Professor of orthodontics, CMH institute of dentistry Lahore, National University of Medical Sciences, Pakistan

    Haris Khan

  3. Orthodontics postgraduate student, Damascus, Syria

    Mays Aldandan

Authors
  1. Samer Mheissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haris Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mays Aldandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer Mheissen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mheissen, S., Khan, H. & Aldandan, M. Limited evidence on differences between fixed appliances and clear aligners regarding pain level. Evid Based Dent 21, 144–145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-020-0140-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-020-0140-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links