Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Three generation families: Analysis of de novo variants in autism

Abstract

De novo variants (DNVs) analysis has proven to be a powerful approach to gene discovery in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), which has not yet been shown in a Brazilian ASD cohort. The relevance of inherited rare variants has also been suggested, particularly in oligogenic models. We hypothesized that three-generation analyses of DNVs could provide new insights into the relevance of de novo and inherited variants across generations. To accomplish this goal, we performed whole-exome sequencing of 33 septet families composed of probands, parents, and grandparents (n = 231 individuals) and compared DNV rates (DNVr) between generations and those from two control cohorts. The DNVr in the probands (DNVr = 1.16) was marginally higher than in parents (DNVr = 0.60; p = 0.054), and in controls (DNVr = 0.68; p = 0.035, congenital heart disorder and DNVr = 0.70; p = 0.047, unaffected ASD siblings from Simons Simplex Collection). Moreover, most of the DNVs were found to have paternal origin in both generations (84.6%). Finally, we observed that 40% (6/15) of the DNVs in parents transmitted for probands are in ASD or ASD candidate genes, representing recently emerged risk variants to ASD in their families and suggest ZNF536, MSL2 and HDAC9 as ASD candidate genes. We did not observe an enrichment of risk variants nor sex bias of transmitted variants in the three generations, that can be due to sample size. These results further reinforce the relevance of de novo variants in ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Poisson regression analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data generated as part of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All de novo variants described in this work were submitted to the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), accession numbers SCV003914734 - SCV003914804.

References

  1. Association AP, Kernberg. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th edition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  2. Lord C, Brugha TS, Charman T, Cusack J, Dumas G, Frazier T, et al. Autism spectrum disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodbury-Smith M, Scherer SW. Progress in the genetics of autism spectrum disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:445–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iossifov I, O’Roak BJ, Sanders SJ, Ronemus M, Krumm N, Levy D, et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature. 2014;515:216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinto D, Delaby E, Merico D, Barbosa M, Merikangas A, Klei L, et al. Convergence of Genes and Cellular Pathways Dysregulated in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:677–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuen RK C, Merico D, Bookman ML, Howe J, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Patel RV, et al. Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:602–11.

  7. Zarrei M, Burton CL, Engchuan W, Young EJ, Higginbotham EJ, MacDonald JR, et al. A large data resource of genomic copy number variation across neurodevelopmental disorders. NPJ Genom Med. 2019;4:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Satterstrom FK, Kosmicki JA, Wang J, Breen MS, De Rubeis S, An JY, et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell. 2020;180:568–84.e23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Turner TN, Coe BP, Dickel DE, Hoekzema K, Nelson BJ, Zody MC, et al. Genomic patterns of De Novo mutation in simplex autism. Cell. 2017;171:710–22.e12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. da Silva Montenegro EM, Costa CS, Campos G, Scliar M, de Almeida TF, Zachi EC, et al. Meta-analyses support previous and novel autism candidate genes: Outcomes of an unexplored Brazilian cohort. Autism Res. 2020;13:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruzzo EK, Pérez-Cano L, Jung JY, Wang LK, Kashef-Haghighi D, Hartl C, et al. Inherited and De Novo genetic risk for autism impacts shared networks. Cell. 2019;178:850–66.e26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilfert AB, Turner TN, Murali SC, Hsieh P, Sulovari A, Wang T, et al. Recent ultra-rare inherited variants implicate new autism candidate risk genes. Nat Genet. 2021;53:1125–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Krumm N, Turner TN, Baker C, Vives L, Mohajeri K, Witherspoon K, et al. Excess of rare, inherited truncating mutations in autism. Nat Genet. 2015;47:582–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuen RKC, Merico D, Cao H, Pellecchia G, Alipanahi B, Thiruvahindrapuram B, et al. Genome-wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1:160271–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, et al. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Z, Moorjani P, Sasani TA, Pedersen BS, Quinlan AR, Jorde LB, et al. Overlooked roles of DNA damage and maternal age in generating human germline mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:9491–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G, et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488:471–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Homsy J, Zaidi S, Shen Y, Ware JS, Samocha KE, Karczewski KJ, et al. De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science. 2015;350:1262–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sifrim A, Hitz MP, Wilsdon A, Breckpot J, Turki SHA, Thienpont B, et al. Distinct genetic architectures for syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart defects identified by exome sequencing. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1060–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Miles JH, Takahashi TN, Bagby S, Sahota PK, Vaslow DF, Wang CH, et al. Essential versus complex autism: Definition of fundamental prognostic subtypes. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2005;135A:171–80.

  21. Ramu A, Noordam MJ, Schwartz RS, Wuster A, Hurles ME, Cartwright RA, et al. DeNovoGear: de novo indel and point mutation discovery and phasing. Nat Methods. 2013;10:985–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Du Y, Li Z, Liu Z, Zhang N, Wang R, Li F, et al. Nonrandom occurrence of multiple de novo coding variants in a proband indicates the existence of an oligogenic model in autism. Genet Med. 2020;22:170–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang T, Zhao PA, Eichler EE. Rare variants and the oligogenic architecture of autism. Trends Genet. 2022;38:895–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pizzo L, Jensen M, Polyak A, Rosenfeld JA, Mannik K, Krishnan A, et al. Rare variants in the genetic background modulate cognitive and developmental phenotypes in individuals carrying disease-associated variants. Genet Med. 2019;21:816–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hiatt SM, Thompson ML, Prokop JW, Lawlor JMJ, Gray DE, Bebin EM, et al. Deleterious Variation in BRSK2 Associates with a Neurodevelopmental Disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104:701–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin Z, Ren F, Xu X, Ren Y, Li H, Wang Y, et al. ZNF536, a novel zinc finger protein specifically expressed in the brain, negatively regulates neuron differentiation by repressing retinoic acid-induced gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3633–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Thyme SB, Pieper LM, Li EH, Pandey S, Wang Y, Morris NS, et al. Phenotypic landscape of schizophrenia-associated genes defines candidates and their shared functions. Cell. 2019;177:478–91.e20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu L, Zee BM, Wang Y, Garcia BA, Dou Y. The RING finger protein MSL2 in the MOF complex is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for H2B K34 and is involved in crosstalk with H3 K4 and K79 methylation. Mol Cell. 2011;43:132–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Volmar CH, Wahlestedt C. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and brain function. Neuroepigenetics. 2015;1:20–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lang B, Alrahbeni TMA, Clair DS, Blackwood DH. HDAC9 is implicated in schizophrenia and expressed specifically in post-mitotic neurons but not in adult neural stem cells. Am J Stem Cells. 2012;1:31–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Krumm N, Turner TN, Baker C, Vives L, Mohajeri K, Witherspoon K, et al. Excess of rare, inherited truncating mutations in autism. Nat Genet. 2015;47:582–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Krumm N, O’Roak BJ, Karakoc E, Mohajeri K, Nelson B, Vives L, et al. Transmission disequilibrium of small CNVs in simplex autism. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Brandler WM, Antaki D, Gujral M, Kleiber ML, Whitney J, Maile MS, et al. Paternally inherited cis-regulatory structural variants are associated with autism. Science. 2018;360:327–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Janecka M, Mill J, Basson MA, Goriely A, Spiers H, Reichenberg A, et al. Advanced paternal age effects in neurodevelopmental disorders—review of potential underlying mechanisms. Translational Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the ASD families that participated and the researchers that contributed indirectly to this study: Ana Cristina de Sanctis Girardi, Susan Walker and Giovanna Pellachia. We also thank Dr. André Fujita for support in statistical analysis. We wish to acknowledge support and resources of MSSNG (https://research.mss.ng), Autism Speaks, and The Centre for Applied Genomics, at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. We also appreciate the contributions of Wilson WL Sung and Darwin D’Souza.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, CEGH-CEL/CEPID process 2013/08028-1, Ph.D. scholarship process 2017/05824-2 and 2018/13743-5), and by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, process 466651/2014-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EMSM and MRPB designed the study. EMSM, GSC, and CISC performed data collection, analysis and helped write the manuscript. SWS conceived and designed MSSNG project and revised the manuscript. FM performed statistical analysis. MS helped with DeNovoGear pipeline and analysis for de novo variants identification. JYTW helped with data annotation and inherited risk variants analysis. AJSC, SLP, WE, BT, and MZ helped perform different components of analysis and data interpretations. MZ revised the manuscript. ECZ contributed to clinical evaluation. NCVL helped with data collection and additional genetic tests of the probands. All authors contributed to data discussion and interpretation of the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rita Passos-Bueno.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SWS is on the Scientific Advisory Committee of Population Bio, and serves as a Highly Cited Academic Advisor for the King Abdulaziz University. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the Instituto de Biociências at Universidade de São Paulo approved the project (accession number 1.133.486), and all the research participants signed a consent term, with written informed consent for publication of individual details obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costa, C.I.S., da Silva Campos, G., da Silva Montenegro, E.M. et al. Three generation families: Analysis of de novo variants in autism. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 1017–1022 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01398-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01398-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links