Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Scientific refutation of ESHG statement on embryo selection

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Forzano F, Antonova O, Clarke A, de Wert G, Hentze S, Jamshidi Y, et al. The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:493–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lello L, Raben TG, Hsu SDH. Sibling validation of polygenic risk scores and complex trait prediction. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Turley P, Meyer MN, Wang N, Cesarini D, Hammonds E, Martin AR. et al. Problems with Using Polygenic Scores to Select Embryos. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:78–86.

  4. Lencz T, Backenroth D, Granot-Hershkovitz E, Green A, Gettler K, Cho J, et al. Utility of polygenic embryo screening for disease depends on the selection strategy. eLife. 2021;10:e64716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McGue M, Willoughby EA, Rustichini A, Johnson W, Iacono WG, Lee JJ. The contribution of cognitive and noncognitive skills to intergenerational social mobility. Psychological Sci. 2020;31:835–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Treff NR, Eccles J, Marin D, Messick E, Lello L, Gerber J, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disease relative risk reduction: evaluation of genomic index performance in 11,883 adult sibling pairs. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:648.

  7. Kumar A, Im K, Banjevic M, Ng PC, Tunstall T, Garcia G, et al. Whole-genome risk prediction of common diseases in human preimplantation embryos. Nat Med. 2022;28:513–6.

Download references


Funding for this ESHG viewpoint article response comes from Genomic Prediction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The authors have all contributed to this manuscript equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Christian Asker Melchior Tellier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare the following interests: LT, NT, and SH are founders and shareholders of Genomic Prediction (GP). EW and LL are employees and shareholders of GP.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tellier, L.C.A.M., Treff, N.R., Hsu, S.D.H. et al. Scientific refutation of ESHG statement on embryo selection. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 278 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links