## Introduction

With more and more datasets including genetic data from hundreds and thousands individuals now available it becomes apparent that most if not all human populations exhibit at least some degree of geography-driven genetic structure even at small scales (for some examples see [1,2,3,4,5]). Such structure is worthy of attention first of all because it may have confounding effects on genetic inference: a number of studies have highlighted the fact that not accounting for genetic structure even in datasets representing one nation or ethnic group may give false-positive results when studying genetic associations and natural selection signals, especially in the case of polygenic phenotypes [6,7,8,9]. However, our understanding of the effects of structure on population genetic analysis is still incomplete. One of the questions requiring further investigations is whether local groups within a country may actually differ in their evolutionary histories, especially in recent times, and thus if analyzing such groups separately may provide additional insights into the population’s past.

In addressing this question we make use of high-coverage whole genome sequences from more than 2300 Estonian Biobank donors generated as a part of a study by Kals et al. [10]. Previous studies [2, 11, 12] have shown using a smaller sample that the Estonian population is genetically structured despite the small area it occupies and the absence of significant physical barriers. Here by exploiting a bigger dataset we study the fine-scale genetic structure in Estonia and assess the local differences in recent demographic history and action of natural selection between genetically defined Estonian subgroups.

## IBD segments-based clustering is informative about fine genetic structure in Estonia

To get a first glance at the Estonian population structure we performed principal component analysis (PCA) both using only the Estonian samples (Fig. 1a) and by projecting Estonian samples onto PC space defined by samples representing various European populations (Fig. 1b). The PCA shows the presence of a genetic gradient within Estonia with the main differentiation observed between South-East and North-East of the country in agreement with previous studies [2, 11, 12]. This differentiation reflects a broader-scale South-North gradient in Eastern Europe (Fig. 1b) with Estonians from the North-East being closer to Finns while South-East Estonians projected closer to Latvians and Lithuanians.

Next, to zoom-in into the fine-scale structure in Estonia we used a subset of 468 individuals sampled in rural areas at the age of 50 or more, as this cohort is expected to be the least affected by recent migrations. We refer to this subset as “R50+” throughout the text (Methods). We used total genetic length of shared IBD segments detected with IBDseq [13] as input for the fineSTRUCTURE (FS) [14] clustering algorithm (Methods) to group the samples into genetic clusters (Fig. 2, Supplementary text 2.3). Such an approach as opposed to the classical FS based on CHROMOPAINTER (CP) chunk count matrix was motivated by the following two ideas. First, IBD segments are expected to be on average longer and younger and thus have a more localized geographic distribution. This, combined with using total length instead of count and so giving more weight to the longer segments (see a similar approach being applied by Bycroft et al. [3]) allows to focus on a rather recent genetic signal when performing the clustering. See Supplementary text 2. Second, as one of the main goals of the clustering was to test for the differences in recent effective population size dynamics as inferred using IBDNe [15] clustering based on IBD-sharing patterns is a natural choice.

IBD-based analysis (Fig. 2) reinforces previous observations [2, 11, 12] and our PCA results, namely the strong differentiation between South-East and the rest of Estonia, and provides a deeper insight into Estonian genetic structure, showing that most of the revealed clusters are highly geographically localized. The sharing matrix provides additional details. First, off-diagonal sharing also reflects geography with clusters from the same area tending to have higher inter-cluster sharing. Second, intra-cluster sharing substantially varies among clusters, implying differences in effective population size (Ne), which is also supported by the results of homozygosity-by-descent analysis (Fig. S2.7).

## Genetic differences between different Estonian regions are driven by isolation within the country and admixture with neighbouring groups

In order to understand how gene flow barriers and/or differences in local population density shaped the IBD-sharing pattern in the R50+ dataset, we inferred migration surfaces using MAPS [16]. We used two windows of IBD segments length (in centimorgans (cM)), 2–6 cM and more than 6 cM, which under a simplistic model of infinite population size have mean segment ages of 50 and 12.5 generations, respectively [16]. The results for the two length bins generally agree with each other, suggesting higher levels of gene flow in the North along with a barrier separating South-East Estonia (Supplementary text 2.4). A second barrier, separating the islands, especially Hiiumaa, from the mainland is also evident. This observation suggests that the population ancestral to modern South-East Estonians was partially isolated from the rest of the country at least since 50 generations ago. Interestingly, this genetic differentiation is consistent with linguistic data suggesting that the deepest split within the Finnic languages separates Southern Estonian from the other branches of the phylum that includes Northern Estonian [17].

As local differences in admixture with external populations may have played a role in creating the observed genetic structure within Estonia we looked at patterns of haplotype sharing between R50+ Estonians and different non-Estonian populations (Table S3.1). Here we used a conventional CP/FS/GLOBETROTTER (GT) approach [18] (Methods). Figure 3 shows the results of non-negative least squares (NNLS) [1], modelling each individual from the R50+ dataset as a result of admixture between non-Estonian groups revealed by CP/FS (Fig. 3, Supplementary text 3.1 and Table S3.4).

Admixture signals in Fig. 3 show clear geographic patterns that match known historical evidence of external migration to Estonia, including Swedish settlements on the western coast and islands in fourteenth to fifteenth centuries and Finnish immigration to North-East Estonia in the seventeenth century [19]. In the latter case the genetic gradient in Estonia is consistent with the broader European trend (Fig. 1b) and thus higher affinity of North-East Estonians to Finns is likely to have a more complex origin. Comparing NNLS results between clusters from Fig. 2 we found that some of them, such as NE_1 and NE_2, stand out in terms of sharing with external groups but most of the clusters have overlapping distributions of NNLS scores (Supplementary text 3.1). A similar pattern is observed in IBD-sharing (Supplementary text 3.2). These results suggest that admixture with non-Estonian groups can only partially explain the fine genetic structure observed in Fig. 2.

## Taking fine-scale genetic structure into account sheds light on regional differences in recent effective population size dynamics in Estonia

We show that, despite the small territory it occupies, the Estonian population is structured (Figs. 1 and 2, Tables S2.3 and S2.4). Next, we sought to explore whether there are any region-specific differences in effective population size dynamics and action of natural selection. We hence applied IBDNe, which estimates effective population size (Ne) in past generations [15], and singleton density score (SDS), a tool for detecting signatures of natural selection [20], as both methods give insight into very recent time periods, when regional differences in population history may be anticipated. For both analyses, we used the entire dataset of 2305 samples, for which clusters were inferred using the same approach as for the R50+ subset. This resulted in 89 and 90 clusters in 2 independent FS runs which were then grouped into higher-order clusters based on the tree topology to increase sample size per cluster with the clustering resembling that from Fig. 2 (Fig. 4a, b).

We ran IBDNe [15] on the four most distinct clusters from Fig. 4a, representing four regions of Estonia: North-West, North-East, South-West and South-East and observed rather distinct Ne trajectories (Fig. 4c, Supplementary text 4.2). In particular, all clusters (except for eSE_5) show evidence of an effective population size decline between 10 and 20 generations ago, which is not detected when the entire dataset is analyzed (Fig. 4c). Overall, these results suggest that population dynamics are region specific and hence population-wide results may depend on the sampling scheme.

Based on MAPS results, we propose that most of the differences in Ne dynamics between Estonian subpopulations may be attributed to different patterns of gene flow and external admixture. South-West and North-West Estonia are characterized by an overall high level of gene flow (Supplementary text 2.4), leading to similar Ne trajectories that deviate only during the last 20 generations (Fig. 4c, Supplementary text 4.2). This also brings about the idea that the strong bottleneck in South-West could contribute to the observed population structure, in particular leading to differentiation of South-West and its subgroups. On the other hand, South-East Estonia has the most distinct Ne trajectory according to Fig. 4c, having a substantially lower long-term Ne compared to other regions. Together with MAPS results (Supplementary text 2.4) this might suggest a recent expansion of a previously small-size eSE_5-like population. This, in turn, results in a rather recent increase in relative proportion of individuals with eSE_5-like ancestry in the entire Estonian population affecting the Ne reconstructions for the entire dataset (Supplementary text 4.2).

## Effective population size estimates in humans can be related to past census population size

Given our understanding of confounders of the observed regional Ne patterns, we exploited the fine-grained temporal resolution enabled by IBDNe to infer changes in actual census sizes (Nc) of the ancestors of contemporary Estonians, adapting previous theoretical work [21] to empirical case of human populations (“Methods”, Supplementary text 4.4). We applied Eq. (3) (Methods) to the Estonian-wide Ne trajectory inferred using the Est1527 subset, which excludes clusters that can be considered as outliers in terms of external admixture and/or Ne trajectory (Supplementary text 4.4). We then compared the inferred Nc with available historical estimates (Fig. 4d) showing a remarkable match between the two with the exception of the last three generations, for which IBDNe estimates are extrapolated from preceding time points [15]. However, note that the pronounced fluctuations in Nc reported by historians between 1500 and 1700 are only very roughly approximated by the Ne-derived curve which, as expected [22], provides only relatively long-term harmonic average of Ne. Nevertheless, we suggest that when keeping in mind all the assumptions implied by the biological notion of Ne, our approach could be used to convert Ne to human Nc at any time interval for which historical records are missing, including the ones provided by pairwise sequential Marcovian coalescence analysis [23], which are beyond the scope of the current paper.

## Signals of recent action of natural selection in Estonia show regional differences

All the analyses performed so far speak for South-East Estonia showing relatively strong genetic differentiation from the rest of the country and having a partially independent demographic history. So we went on to look into signals of recent action of natural selection with a specific focus on whether treating South-East Estonia independently can reveal any additional insights. In order to do so we applied SDS [20] to the entire dataset of 2305 samples as well as to two genetically defined subsets, South-East Estonia (SE, consisting of 1029 samples belonging to clusters eSE_1–eSE_5 in Fig. 4a) and the remaining 1276 samples from the rest of the country (nonSE) (“Methods”, Supplementary text 5.1).

First, we inspected the genome-wide distribution of SDS p values in the three datasets (Fig. 5) for any evidence of recent selection acting at individual loci. Unlike other studies that used SDS [20, 24] we do not observe any hits with p values below 5 × 10–8. We attribute this lack of genome-wide hits to a shorter time window within which we can detect selection in our dataset as indicated by lower average number of singletons, lower recent Ne and higher correlation between our SDS results and the difference in derived allele frequency (DAF) between Estonian and the UK dataset compared to the study by Field et al. (see Supplementary text 5.3). This property of our dataset reduces our power to detect selection but it also allows us to get a sense of remarkably recent selective processes. Despite not detecting any genome-wide significant hits we observe 33 SNPs in 10 genomic loci with a p values below 1 × 10−5 (Table S5.1). Out of these loci the ones on chromosomes 4 and 9 are the most promising targets of recent population-specific selection as besides low SDS p values they are characterized by DAF out of the range between the Finnish and the British datasets (Table S5.1) and evidence of being associated with expression levels of nearby genes (Table S5.2).

When we compare results for SE and nonSE we see weak correlation between standardized SDS (sSDS) values in the two subsets (Fig. S5.3e) with most of the SNPs having sSDS scores close to 0 which is the neutral expectation. However, there are 61 SNPs in 34 genomic regions with p values below 1 × 10−5 in 1 of the 2 subsets but not in the other (Table S5.1). Though many of those SNPs may be false positives there are five genomic regions that might represent genuine hits specific to one of the Estonian regions as the corresponding SNPs are characterized not only by low p values but also by FST between SE and nonSE above 0.011 which is the 99.9 percentile of the genome-wide FST distribution (Table S5.1). One of these regions lies within an intron of in the GRM1 gene and includes SNPs rs75386033 and rs79907158 which have a p value below 1 × 10−8 in SE (see Supplementary text 5.4). While those SNPs are not eQTLs themselves they lie in a region which is enriched in SNPs associated with expression levels of the EPM2A gene (Fig. S5.4, Supplementary text 5.4). This gene is associated with Lafora disease which is a form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy [25,26,27]. Another SNP from this list, rs7114857, lies within the GRM5 gene which has been shown previously to be a potential target of natural selection for the pigmentation phenotype [28]. See Supplementary text 5.4 for details.

Next, we looked for possible signals of polygenic selection both in the entire dataset as well as in SE and nonSE by (1) focusing on SNPs and testing if any GWAS category was enriched in SNPs with high absolute sSDS scores and if there was any correlation between the absolute sSDS and absolute GWAS betas (see Supplementary text 5.2 for details); (2) focusing on genes we used EnrichR [29, 30] to see if any functional annotation category was enriched in genes that harbour SNPs with absolute sSDS scores [31] above 2.5 and Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) [31] PHRED scores above 10. Using the first approach and correcting for linkage between SNPs resulted in a number of categories being enriched in high absolute sSDS scores and/or showing correlation between sSDS values and betas (Supplementary text 5.3 and 5.4). Such categories largely overlap between the entire dataset and the nonSE subset and are related to lung or autoimmune diseases. However, all those results lost statistical significance at FDR equal to 0.05 when removing SNPs falling into the HLA locus (Tables S5.4, S5.5 and S5.6). While the results in the nonSE subset mostly replicate those obtained on the entire dataset the SE subset does not show most of the signals detected in the entire dataset but shows a correlation between sSDS and betas for the “Bone mineral density category” category which has an FDR corrected p value of 0.0505 even after removing linked SNPs and those in the HLA locus thus indicating a suggestive instance of polygenic selection specific to South-East Estonia. On the other hand, gene enrichment results show broadly the same results in all the datasets.

To conclude, here we show evidence of potential very recent and geographically localized selection providing an important case for our understanding of ongoing natural selection in humans.

## Conclusions

Here we describe a dataset of more than 2300 high-coverage Estonian genomes making it one of the smallest populations to date with such high-resolution data available. We show that the Estonian population, despite occupying a small area with no strong geographic barriers, is genetically structured and exhibits rather pronounced interregional differences with respect to recent admixture with neighbouring groups, population dynamics and potential action of natural selection. These observations together with results of other studies suggest that population stratification may be ubiquitous in human populations, and should be taken into account in any large-scale genetic study including reconstructions of recent population history. We also show that we are able to accurately link effective population size to actual census size based on some simple assumptions about human population age structure and reproduction patterns.

Ultimately, the results of our study bring us to a fundamental question about the limits of the concept of discrete populations when studying human genetic diversity as datasets that uniformly cover broad geographic areas become common. Specifically, given the current opportunity to study very recent history including ongoing natural selection new theoretical and methodological advances might be needed to deal with spatial genetic structure directly rather than approximating it by clustering.

## Methods

### Data reporting

No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.

### Whole genome sequencing data

We used whole genome sequences of 2535 Estonian Biobank participants reported in Kals et al. [10]. Detailed information about the dataset and the way the samples were sequenced and filtered can be found in the corresponding publication while a brief description is provided in the Supplementary text 1.1. In addition to sample filtering applied by Kals et al. [10], we removed seven samples with missing call over 3% as well as relatives up to third degree. This resulted in a dataset consisting of 2305 individuals that was used for all downstream analyses. For all manipulations with vcf files bcftools-1.8 [32] was used unless specified otherwise while PLINK-1.9 [33] and KING-2.1.6 [34] was used to estimate relatedness.

For analyses that require phased and/or imputed data (CP, SDS) phasing and imputation was done using Eagle v2.3 [35] on the dataset consisting of 2420 samples to benefit from the presence of related individuals and subsequently relevant samples were extracted.

All Estonian Biobank participants have signed a broad informed consent which allows research in the fields of genetic epidemiology, disease risk factors and population history. All work at Estonian Biobank is conducted according to the Estonian Human Gene Research Act. The original study generating the WGS data [10] was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Tartu (application number 234/T-12).

### The “Rural above 50 years old” (R50+) panel

As information on parents’ and grandparents’ birthplace is mostly unavailable for the samples used here, we subset the 2305 dataset for individuals born in rural areas and sampled at the age of 50 or older as we expect this cohort to be the least affected by recent migration. This resulted in a dataset of 474 individuals which we further pruned for PCA outliers (see below) and samples with more than 10,000 singletons (Supplementary text 1.11.3). We ended up with a panel of 468 individuals, which we call “R50+”.

### Non-Estonian samples

To place the Estonian population genetic variation in Eurasian context we compiled two datasets, one for PCA and one for CP/FS/GT, containing the R50+ Estonian samples each and samples from various populations predominantly representing West Eurasia. The datasets are described in Tables S1.2 and S3.1. These datasets include both sequenced and genotyped samples so only overlapping positions (around 450K SNPs in both cases) are used in corresponding analyses.

### Principal component analysis

We ran PCA for the entire Estonian dataset in two settings: with only the 2305 Estonians and combining the 2305 Estonians with 521 non-Estonian samples from 18 European populations (Table S1.2). In both cases smartPCA from EIGENSOFT-7.2.0 [36] was used. See Supplementary text 1.2 for details.

### CHROMOPAINTER/fineSTRUCTURE/GLOBETROTTER

To study genetic similarities between Estonians and other European populations we used the CP/FS pipeline [18]. Initial chromosome painting parameters were estimated using 30% of the phased dataset of 1068 Estonian and non-Estonian samples (Table S3.1). FS was run for 15 million MCMC iterations in two parallel runs to assess convergence. The tree-building step was performed using the approach from Leslie et al. [1] and the run with the highest observed posterior likelihood was used to cluster the samples into genetic groups. Inferred FS groups were further manually inspected and clustered into the higher-order FS populations (Supplementary text 3.1). These FS groups were used as surrogate populations to infer admixture with GT and estimate ancestry profile with NNLS.

Next, GT [18] was used to detect signals and dates of admixture for the Estonian groups defined using the approach described above. GT inference was performed using a “regional” approach [18, 37].

Finally, we used NNLS [1] to assign relative ancestral proportions to each individual in the R50+ panel using the non-Estonian surrogate groups identified by FS as sources. NNLS values for CP/FS Estonian groups were extracted from GT output while for individual samples these were calculated with an in-house R script. Obtained results were then summarized across Estonian parishes as well as across IBD/FS clusters.

### Detecting segments identical-by-descent (IBD segments)

To detect IBD segments in the Estonian dataset we applied IBDseq version r1206 [13] with default settings to the non-phased non-imputed dataset consisting of 2305 Estonians. As IBDseq software reports only physical coordinates of a segment’s start and end we interpolated segments’ genetic length in cM using GRCh37 recombination map using R [38]. When working with the R50+ panel corresponding IBD segments were retrieved from the general output obtained on the 2305 dataset. Homozygosity-by-descent segments were also inferred with IBDseq.

IBD segments between Estonians and non-Estonian individuals were detected by applying refined IBD version 12Jul18.a0b [39] with default parameters except for length = 1.0 to the same dataset that was used for CP/FS/GT, as in this case the dataset is highly structured. This was followed by applying the merge-ibd utility version 12Jul18.a0b to merge together segments separated by at most 1 cM long gaps and no more than two positions with genotypes discordant with IBD.

Both for IBDseq and refined IBD/ibd-merge results segments shorter than 2 cM were discarded, as longer segments are detected with higher reliability.

### MAPS

In order to evaluate the extent of gene flow across the whole country together with local population densities, we estimated migration surfaces using MAPS [16], which harnesses a matrix summarizing the total number of IBD segments shared in a given population. In doing so, we used the IBD segments shared among pairs of individuals inferred with IBDseq as described in the previous section. Subsequently we have classified the shared genetic fragments as “short” (between 2 and 6 cM) and “long” (more than 6 cM), and performed two independent MAPS runs for each length class to assess convergence. Estonian territory was modelled as having a total of 200 demes. Each run had 5 million iterations thinned every 10,000 and preceded by a burn-in of 2 million discarded cycles. The obtained migration surfaces were subsequently plotted using the plotmaps R package [16]. We repeated the whole procedure after removing samples belonging to clusters from Fig. 2 with mean sharing above 60 cM to assess their effect on MAPS results.

### IBD-based fineSTRUCTURE (IBD/FS)

We used total genetic length of IBD segments longer than 2 cM as a measure of genetic similarity between pairs of individuals as described in Supplementary text 1.2 and 2.2. When running FS for both R50+ and the entire dataset the first 2,000,000 MCMC iterations were removed as burn-in and subsequently MCMC was run for additional 2,000,000 MCMC iterations sampling every 10,000th run. When building the tree we used the approach described in Leslie et al. [1].

We applied this approach to the R50+ dataset (468 samples) and the entire dataset (2305 samples). In both cases FS was run twice to assess convergence (Supplementary text 2.3, Tables S2.1 and S2.2). Dataset to reduce the number of clusters revealed by the FS algorithm we have hierarchically joined together clusters with short terminal branches by cutting the tree at such a level so as to avoid having clusters consisting of less than 5 samples in the case of the R50+ and 50 in the case of the entire dataset.

### Fst calculations

Fst between Estonian clusters was calculated using smartpca from the EIGENSOFT package v7.2.0 [36] after LD-pruning (r2 > 0.4, windows of 1000 SNPs) and removing sites with MAF < 0.05 and missing rate > 0.1. Per-site Weir and Cockerham [40] Fst estimator between SE and nonSE subsets was calculated using vcfttools [41] after filtering sites for LD, MAF and missing rate the same way as described above.

### Geographic data visualization

Geographic coordinates of the corresponding birth town/parish were assigned to each sample with birthplace information available (2168 out of 2305 samples). For MAPS these coordinates were used directly. When plotting IBD/FS and NNLS results for the R50+ panel, coordinates of the samples were changed manually to avoid overplotting. When plotting samples from the entire dataset jittering were used for the same purpose. Shp objects used to plot maps of Estonia with parish and county borders were retrieved from the Estonian Land Board website (administrative and settlement units, 2018.11.01, https://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/eng/Spatial-Data/Administrative-and-Settlement-Division-p312.html). Geographic data were visualized in R [38] with the aid of the following packages: sp [42, 43], sf [44], rgdal [45], rgeos [46] and ggplot2 [47].

### IBDNe

In order to reconstruct recent Ne dynamics we used IBDNe version 07May18.6a4 [15] with default settings. IBD segments used as input for IBDNe were detected with IBDseq [13].

To get independent evidence of regional differences in Ne dynamics we applied IBDNe to samples from the People of the British Isles [1] dataset grouped by the region of origin of individuals’ grandparents. The following regions were used: Scotland, Wales and North-East, North-West, South-East and South-West England. For the list of counties comprising these regions see Table S4.1.

### Genetic simulations

To simulate genetic data under various demographic scenarios to test the behaviour of IBDNe we used mspms which is an ms-compatible version of msprime [48]. Commands used for simulation are provided in the Supplementary text section 4.1.

### Estimating actual census size based on Ne

Several lines of evidence, based both on theoretical reasoning [49] and empirical comparisons [15] suggest that in industrial human societies census size (Nc) is roughly threefold the Ne assuming a panmictic and isolated population. To obtain a more universal conversion method we adapted the approach from [22] which incorporates inbreeding coefficient (Fis), relative fraction of males (m) and excess in variance of reproductive success compared to the Poisson distribution (DV):

$$N_{b(t)} = \frac{{(1 + {\mathrm{Fis}})}}{4} \times (\frac{1}{{(1 - m) \times m}} + {\mathrm{DV}}) \times N_{e(t)}.$$
(1)

In order to apply this formula to human populations we explored the possible range of the corresponding parameters to obtain the minimal and maximal values of the conversion coefficient: 0.75 (with m = 0.5 and DV = −1) and 3.53 (with m = 0.1 or 0.9 and DV = 3), respectively (see Supplementary text section 4.4). To provide a single point estimate of Nc we rewrite formula (1) as:

$$N_{b(t)} = 1.63 \times N_{e(t)},$$
(2)

using a geometric mean between 0.75 and 3.5 and thus making our estimate slightly more than twofold away from the provided range boundaries. Note, that although there are indications that in some human populations DV can be higher than 3 [50], such cases can be considered to be at the very extreme of human reproductive behaviour spectrum as even hypothetical “super-male” populations would have a sex-average DV of 1.8 given m equals to 0.5 [51].

The value estimated using (2) corresponds to the number of individuals in reproductive age. It can be converted into total census size (Nc) of a human population at a given time point by dividing it by the estimated fraction of breeding individuals, which we here assume to be roughly 0.33 (Supplementary text section 4.4). Incorporating this idea into (2) results in equation (3):

$$N_{c(t)} = 4.89 \times N_{e(t)},$$
(3)

which we used to obtain the curve in Fig. 4D. Sources of historical estimates of Estonian population size used in that figure are provided in Fig. S4.10.

### Singleton density score (SDS) selection scan

SDS [20] analysis was applied to three datasets separately, namely, the entire dataset and it was two subsets, Estonia SE and Estonia nonSE. The latter two were defined based on the IBD/FS results (Fig. 4a): SE (individuals with South-East Estonian ancestry belonging to clusters eSE_1–eSE_5) and nonSE (individuals coming from the other parts of the country and belonging to other clusters). Data processing as well as the way SDS was run follow the guidelines of the authors of the original study [20] and are described in Supplementary text section 5.1.

Predicted functional effect of the test SNPs was assessed using CADD tool [31]. In addition, two alternative enrichment tests were performed to see whether candidate SNPs are enriched in a certain category of genes [29, 30] or in certain GWAS catalogue categories (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/home; [52]). Candidate SNPs were also checked for known e-QTL effects using the eQTLGen Consortium [53] (http://www.eqtlgen.org/) database. Details of SNP annotation and enrichment analyses are specified in Supplementary text section 5.2.