Abstract
Despite the implementation of ‘Enhanced Recovery After Surgery’ (ERAS) protocols, major abdominal surgery is still associated with significant and detrimental losses of muscle mass and function in the post-operative period. Although ERAS protocols advocate both early mobility and dietary intake, dietary composition in the immediate post-operative period is poorly characterised, despite muscle losses being greatest in this period. Herein, we show in 15 patients (66 ± 6 y, 12:3 M:F) who lost ~10% m. vastus lateralis muscle mass in the 5 days after open colorectal resective surgery, mean energy intake was only ~25% of the minimum ESPEN recommendation of 25 kcal/kg/d and daily dietary protein intake was only ~12% of the ESPEN recommended guidelines of 1.5 g/kg/d. Given the known importance of nutrition for muscle mass maintenance, innovative dietary interventions are needed in the immediate post-operative period, accounting for specific patient dietary preference to maximise compliance (e.g., soft-textured foods).
Introduction
Substantial losses of skeletal muscle mass and function occur after major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery - likely due to the physiological insult of surgery, physical inactivity, and inadequate protein nutrition in the post-operative period [1]; with the greatest losses occurring in the first post-operative week [2]. Surgery-related muscle loss is associated with declines in muscle function important for independence, a slower return to normal activities, and reduced quality of life [3]. In addition, as the majority of major abdominal surgery is performed in patients over 60 years of age [4], these patients face this surgery and the associated muscle mass losses, on a background of sarcopenia [5]. Furthermore, in older age, the cumulative effect of repeated short bouts of muscle disuse (such as those associated with surgery), may be a key factor in the development of frailty [3], which incurs significant burden to individuals, families, and society.
Mass muscle maintenance is regulated by the dynamic processes of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and breakdown (MPB), which in healthy muscle is achieved via postprandial increases in MPS interspersed with postabsorptive periods of negative net protein balance (i.e., MPB > MPS), with contractile activity known to enhance MPS responses to nutrition [6]. In addition to promoting early mobility, ‘Enhanced Recovery After Surgery’ (ERAS) protocols aim to accelerate post-operative recovery by advocating early dietary intake. However, they do not provide specific guidance on nutritional composition [7], leading to wide variability in practice. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the true immediate post-operative dietary energy and protein intake of abdominal surgery patients in the context of the most recent and relevant European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines [8], with a view to inform future nutritional approaches to maximise muscle mass maintenance in this crucial period of recovery.
Methods
Fifteen patients (demographics are provided in Table 1) undergoing open major colorectal resection and following an ERAS protocol at a single hospital site in the United Kingdom were recruited to this study (NHS Ethics Committee Approval: 20/EM/069, IRAS ID: 274048) which was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04199936). Dietary intake on post-operative days (POD) 1 to 4 was recorded using a questionnaire completed by the patient alone, or with a researcher as required, and cross-referenced against hospital documentation. Details of food options were provided by the hospitals catering supplier (ISS, Søborg, Denmark), with nutrient composition calculated using specialist software (Nutritics Ltd, Dublin, Ireland). Energy intake values were compared to 25–30 kcal/kg/d and protein to 1.5 g/kg/d, based on the ESPEN guidelines regarding clinical nutrition in surgery [8]. Data is presented as mean ± SD with between-day differences analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analysis (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Results
In this group of patients who lost 9.16 ± 2.0% quadriceps muscle mass (measured as Vastus Lateralis cross sectional area via ultrasound [9]) in the 5 days after surgery [9], mean daily energy intake was 536.6 ± 527.8 kcal across the 4 post-operative days, and 490.0 ± 470.7, 505.0 ± 251.8, 541.0 ± 488.1, 610.5 ± 900.5 kcal on POD 1 to 4 respectively (Fig. 1A). Despite a numerical increase day-on-day, there was no significant difference in energy intake between the days. Mean daily protein intake was 15.6 ± 16.4 g across the 4 post-operative days, and 13.9 ± 14.1, 14.9 ± 10.2, 15.0 ± 15.6, 18.5 ± 25.6 g on POD 1 to 4 respectively (Fig. 1B). No significant difference in protein intake was found between the days. This equated to mean daily energy intake over POD1 to 4 being just 25.3 ± 24.9% of the ESPEN recommendation, reducing to 12.8 ± 2.6% in patients with ileus. Mean daily protein intake was only 12.3 ± 12.9% of the ESPEN recommendations, and only 5.7 ± 0.9% for those with ileus. Overall, only 1 patient consumed the recommended energy intake (on POD4). No patients managed to achieve over 50% of the recommended protein intake on POD1 to 3, with just 1 patient achieving this (78%) on POD4.
Mean daily energy intake (A) and mean daily protein intake (B) in post-operative patients’ 1–4 days after surgery (black data points). For daily energy intake, representative ESPEN data is calculated using the average weight of the patients recruited to this study (84.7 kg) and the minimum recommended energy intake (25 kcal/kg/d) [8]. For daily protein intake, representative ESPEN data is calculated using the average weight of the patients recruited to this study (84.7 kg) and the recommended protein intake (1.5 g/kg/d) [8]. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Collectively for all patients, the percentage of energy consumed as protein was 11.65 ± 2.0 on POD1, 12.26 ± 4.9 on POD2, 11.12 ± 4.9 on POD3, and 11.9 ± 3.9% on POD4, indicative of a low protein diet across this period. Interestingly, compared to the day-on-day increase in energy intake across the post-operative period, the percentage of energy consumed as protein did not increase.
Patients expressed a clear preference for soft-textured foods (e.g., soup, jelly, ice cream), with these making up 73% of meal choices on POD1, 84% on POD2, 55% on POD3, and 48% on POD4. Overall, 66% of meal choices across POD1 to 4 were soft-textured.
Discussion
In addition to encouraging early mobility, ERAS guidelines encourage early dietary intake in patients after major abdominal surgery [7]. However, this is primarily to support accelerated gastrointestinal recovery, decreased hospital length of stay, and decreased rate of complications and mortality, rather than the preservation of muscle mass and function. While early dietary intake is encouraged, we clearly demonstrate that post-operative patients are consuming well below the energy and protein requirements recommended by ESPEN [8], which may contribute to observed detrimental losses in muscle mass in these patients. Furthermore, what this post-operative diet should consist of is not specified. The importance of adequate protein intake for muscle mass maintenance is well established, however when given free choice patients appear to choose low protein, soft-texture foods, limiting anabolic potential which is likely already blunted in the face of age-associated anabolic resistance [6], post-operative inflammation and inactivity [1]. Although patients’ caloric and protein intake can be enhanced through provision of liquid supplements, these supplements are often not well-liked or tolerated [10]. As such, the development of protein-enriched forms of the whole foods popular with post-operative patients (e.g., ice-cream, jelly, soup, yogurt) may help to achieve the recommended dietary intake goals, as may more palatable liquid nutritional supplements. Both of these options should be explored to maximise protein intake and enhance skeletal muscle anabolism in these patients.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
van Wijk L, van Duinhoven S, Liem MSL, Bouman DE, Viddeleer AR, Klaase JM. Risk factors for surgery-related muscle quantity and muscle quality loss and their impact on outcome. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00507-9.
Aoyama T, Kawabe T, Hirohito F, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Tsuchida K, et al. Body composition analysis within 1 month after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:645–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0496-x.
Dronkers J, Witteman B, van Meeteren N. Surgery and functional mobility: doing the right thing at the right time. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:339–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1487-6.
Shipway D, Partridge J, Braude P, Vilches-Moraga A. British Geriatric Society position statement: older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Age Ageing. 2021;50:268–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa172.
Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr. 1997;127:990S–991S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.5.990S.
Atherton PJ, Smith K. Muscle protein synthesis in response to nutrition and exercise. J Physiol. 2012;590:1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.225003.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43:659–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:623–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013.
Hardy EJ, Hatt J, Doleman B, Smart TF, Piasecki M, Lund JN, et al. Post-operative electrical muscle stimulation attenuates loss of muscle mass and function following major abdominal surgery in older adults: a split body randomised control trial. Age Ageing 2022; 51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac234.
Lester S, Kleijn M, Cornacchia L, Hewson L, Taylor MA, Fisk I. Factors Affecting Adherence, Intake, and Perceived Palatability of Oral Nutritional Supplements: A Literature Review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26:663–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1819-3.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ms. Anna Quinn and Ms. Emma Bergin for their help with data collection. This research was funded by the Medical Research Council and Versus Arthritis via the MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (MR/P021220/1) and BBSRC (BB/R010358/1). CSD was supported by a Medical Research Council Skills Development Fellowship (MR/T026014/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EJH, JNL, and BEP: study conception and design. EJH: acquisition of data. EJH, CSD, JNL, and BEP: analysis and interpretation of data. EJH, CSD, and BEP wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final approval of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hardy, E.J., Deane, C.S., Lund, J.N. et al. Loss of muscle mass in the immediate post-operative period is associated with inadequate dietary protein and energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 77, 503–505 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01264-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01264-0