Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Estimated skeletal muscle mass and density values measured on computed tomography examinations in over 1000 living kidney donors

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Currently, there are no widely accepted cut-off points to categorize patients as sarcopenic (low skeletal muscle mass) or myosteatotic based on computed tomography (CT) measurements. Moreover, little is known about skeletal muscle mass in healthy subjects, particularly in a Western-European population.

Subjects/Methods

Skeletal muscle mass (skeletal muscle index, cm2/m2) and density (Hounsfield units, HU) at the level of the third lumbar vertebra were measured on contrast-enhanced CT images in live kidney donors with an age range of 18–86 years, who may be considered as healthy subjects, from 2010 to 2015. Differences between sex, body mass index (BMI), age groups, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were assessed. Mann−Whitney U and Kruskal−Wallis tests were used to compare groups.

Results

Of the 1073 included patients, 499 (46.5%) were male and the median age and BMI were 51 years and 25.4 kg/m2, respectively. Male gender, increased age, and increased BMI were significantly associated with both skeletal muscle mass and density. Nomograms including these parameters were developed to calculate the estimated skeletal muscle mass and density of a healthy subject and the lower bound of the 90% prediction interval (p5) values were provided.

Conclusions

Skeletal muscle density and mass were significantly associated with sex, age, and BMI in a large cohort of healthy Western-European subjects. The newly developed nomograms may be used to calculate the estimated healthy skeletal muscle mass for individuals in patient populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Human body composition: advances in models and methods. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17:527–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kvist H, Sjostrom L, Tylen U. Adipose tissue volume determinations in women by computed tomography: technical considerations. Int J Obes. 1986;10:53–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prado CM, Birdsell LA, Baracos VE. The emerging role of computerized tomography in assessing cancer cachexia. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2009;3:269–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0b013e328331124a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge MP, Albu J. et al. Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004;97:2333–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004.[pii].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schweitzer L, Geisler C, Pourhassan M, Braun W, Gluer CC, Bosy-Westphal A, et al. What is the best reference site for a single MRI slice to assess whole-body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults? Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:58–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L. et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:629–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levolger S, van Vugt JL, de Bruin RW, IJzermans JN. Systematic review of sarcopenia in patients operated on for gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1448–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Vugt JL, Levolger S, de Bruin RW, van Rosmalen J, Metselaar HJ, IJzermans JN. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of computed tomography assessed skeletal muscle mass on outcome in patients awaiting or undergoing liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:997–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Vledder MG, Levolger S, Ayez N, Verhoef C, Tran TC, IJzermans JN. Body composition and outcome in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2012;99:550–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coelen RJ, Wiggers JK, Nio CY, Besselink MG, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, et al. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of skeletal muscle mass is valuable in predicting outcomes following hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17:520–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin L, Birdsell L, Macdonald N, Reiman T, Clandinin MT, McCargar LJ. et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1539–47. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.200400744.2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Masanes F, Rojano ILX, Salva A, Serra-Rexach JA, Artaza I, Formiga F, et al. Cut-off points for muscle mass—not grip strength or gait speed—determine variations in sarcopenia prevalence. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:825–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Vugt JL, Levolger S, de Bruin RW, IJzermans JN. A comparative study of software programs for cross-sectional skeletal muscle area measurements on abdominal computed tomography scans. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8:285–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Vugt JLA, Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, Schippers HJW, Veen KM, Levolger S, de Bruin RWF, et al. Contrast-enhancement influences skeletal muscle density, but not skeletal muscle mass, measurements on computed tomography. Clin Nutr. 2017. pii: S0261-5614; 30246-7.

  16. van der Werf A, Langius JAE, de van der Schueren MAE, Nurmohamed SA, van der Pant K, Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S. et al. Percentiles for skeletal muscle index, area and radiation attenuation based on computed tomography imaging in a healthy Caucasian population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018; 72:288–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carey EJ, Lai JC, Wang CW, Dasarathy S, Lobach I, Montano-Loza AJ, et al. A multicenter study to define sarcopenia in patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:625–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Golse N, Bucur PO, Ciacio O, Pittau G, Sa Cunha A, Adam R, et al. A new definition of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:143–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Nakagawara H, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Toshima T, et al. Skeletal muscle area correlates with body surface area in healthy adults. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:313–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Collaboration NCDRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1377–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garatachea N, Lucia A. Genes and the ageing muscle: a review on genetic association studies. Age (Dordrecht). 2013;35:207–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Welle S, Tawil R, Thornton CA. Sex-related differences in gene expression in human skeletal muscle. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S, Kobayashi A, Hammad A, Tamai Y, et al. Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition. 2016;32:1200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baracos VE. Psoas as a sentinel muscle for sarcopenia: a flawed premise. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8:527–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franssen FM, Rutten EP, Groenen MT, Vanfleteren LE, Wouters EF, Spruit MA. New reference values for body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the general population: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:448 e441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thorpe RJ, Simonsick E, Zonderman A, Evans MK. Association between race, household income and grip strength in middle- and older-aged adults. Ethn Dis. 2016;26:493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guessous I, Luthi JC, Bowling CB, Theler JM, Paccaud F, Gaspoz JM, et al. Prevalence of frailty indicators and association with socioeconomic status in middle-aged and older adults in a swiss region with universal health insurance coverage: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Aging Res. 2014;2014:198603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Popuri K, Cobzas D, Esfandiari N, Baracos V, Jagersand M. Body composition assessment in axial CT images using FEM-based automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Akhtar-Danesh N, Dehghan M, Merchant AT, Rainey JA. Validity of self-reported height and weight for measuring prevalence of obesity. Open Med. 2008;2:e83–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gunnell D, Berney L, Holland P, Maynard M, Blane D, Frankel S, et al. How accurately are height, weight and leg length reported by the elderly, and how closely are they related to measurements recorded in childhood? Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:456–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge MP, Albu J, et al. Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:271–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Giusto M, Lattanzi B, Albanese C, Galtieri A, Farcomeni A, Giannelli V, et al. Sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis: the role of computed tomography scan for the assessment of muscle mass compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:328–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rutten IJ, Ubachs J, Kruitwagen RFPM, Beets-Tan RGH, Olde Damink SWM, van Gorp T. Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle Wasting, Berlin, Germany, 10–11 December 2016 (part 2) (1-45): Psoas muscle measurements are inferior to total skeletal muscle measurements in the assessment of sarcopenia in ovarian cancer). J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8:161–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cakir H, Heus C, van der Ploeg TJ, Houdijk AP. Visceral obesity determined by CT scan and outcomes after colorectal surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:875–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van Grinsven J, van Vugt JL, Gharbharan A, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, et al. The Association of Computed Tomography-assessed body composition with mortality in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.J Gastrointest Surg.2017;21:1000–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marcel Koek and Wiro Niessen from the Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center (Rotterdam, Netherlands), for the software to perform skeletal muscle mass measurements, Laurens Groenendijk and Ivo Cornelissen from the Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center (Rotterdam, Netherlands) and Barbara Janssen from the Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, Netherlands) for collecting the CT examinations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen L. A. van Vugt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Vugt, J.L.A., van Putten, Y., van der Kall, I.M. et al. Estimated skeletal muscle mass and density values measured on computed tomography examinations in over 1000 living kidney donors. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 879–886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0287-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0287-7

Search

Quick links