Abstract
To increase the quality of life of dialysis patients while maintaining economic efficiency, the concept of a wearable artificial kidney was proposed and designed approximately two decades ago. However, the primary challenge in the development of a wearable artificial kidney is the adequate removal of urea from dialysate due to the chemical inertness of urea under physiological conditions. Herein, a hollow polystyrene nanoparticle with sulfonic acid groups, named H-CPS-SO3H, was synthesized that could efficiently adsorb urea. H-CPS-SO3H was produced in three steps. First, a core-shell polystyrene nanoparticle with a linear core and cross-linked shell was prepared using modified emulsion polymerization. Second, the core-shell nanoparticles were treated with DMF to create hollow nanoparticles. Finally, the hollow nanoparticles were subjected to sulfuric acid treatment to produce H-CPS-SO3H, which was confirmed by both TEM and FTIR analysis. The urea adsorption capacity and kinetics of the as-synthesized H-CPS-SO3H were evaluated in a 30 mM urea aqueous solution. The results indicated that H-CPS-SO3H had a urea absorption capacity of up to 1 mmol/g, which was achieved after only two hours of adsorption at 37 °C. These findings demonstrated the high adsorption capacity and favorable adsorption kinetics of H-CPS-SO3H. Additionally, the adsorption capacity first increased and then slightly decreased with decreasing pH or increasing solution volume, while the adsorption capacity sharply decreased with increasing ionic strength. The results suggest that the prepared H-CPS-SO3H has promising application potential in the field of wearable artificial kidney devices.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Salani M, Roy S, Fissell WH. Innovations in wearable and implantable artificial kidneys. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72:745–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.06.005.
Davenport A. A wearable dialysis device: the first step to continuous therapy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:512–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.100.
Gura V, Beizai M, Ezon C, Polaschegg HD. Continuous renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease. Contrib Nephrol. 2005;149:325–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/abio.370040210.
Huff C. How artificial kidneys and miniaturized dialysis could save millions of lives. Nature. 2020;579:186–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00671-8.
Duranton F, Cohen G, De Smet R, Rodriguez M, Jankowski J, Vanholder R, et al. Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1258–70. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2011121175.
van Gelder MK, Jong JAW, Folkertsma L, Guo Y, Bluchel C, Verhaar MC, et al. Urea removal strategies for dialysate regeneration in a wearable artificial kidney. Biomaterials. 2020;234:119735 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119735.
Meng F, Seredych M, Chen C, Gura V, Mikhalovsky S, Sandeman S, et al. MXene sorbents for removal of urea from dialysate: a step toward the wearable artificial kidney. ACS Nano. 2018; 10518-28. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b06494.
Zhao H, Huang J, Huang L, Yang Y, Xiao Z, Chen Q, et al. Surface control approach for growth of cerium oxide on flower-like molybdenum disulfide nanosheets enables superior removal of uremic toxins. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;630:855–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.142.
Mosavi SH, Zare-Dorabei R. Synthesis of an IRMOF-1@SiO2 core-shell and amino-functionalization with APTES for the adsorption of urea and creatinine using a fixed-bed column study. Langmuir ACS J Surfaces Colloids. 2023;39:6623–36. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00632.
Pan X, Liu P, Wang YW, Yi YL, Zhang HQ, Qian DW, et al. Synthesis of starch nanoparticles with controlled morphology and various adsorption rate for urea. Food Chem. 2022;369:130882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130882.
Yen ZH, Salim T, Boothroyd C, Haywood PF, Kuo CT, Lee SJ, et al. MXene nanosheets functionalized with Cu atoms for urea adsorption in aqueous media. Acs Appl Nano Mater. 2023;6:16486–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c02723.
Xue C, Wilson LD. Kinetic study on urea uptake with chitosan based sorbent materials. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;135:180–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.090.
Liu J, Chen X, Shao Z, Zhou P. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/Cu(II) affinity membrane for urea adsorption. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;90:1108–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12841.
Abidin MNZ, Goh PS, Ismail AF, Said N, Othman MHD, Hasbullah H, et al. Highly adsorptive oxidized starch nanoparticles for efficient urea removal. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;201:257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.069.
Bing-Lin H, Zhao X-B. Study of the oxidation of crosslinked β-cyclodextrin polymer and its use in the removal of urea. I. Reactive Polym. 1992;18:229–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-1137(92)90653-J.
Jong JAW, Guo Y, Veenhoven C, Moret ME, van der Zwan J, Paioni AL, et al. Phenylglyoxaldehyde-functionalized polymeric sorbents for urea removal from aqueous solutions. ACS Appl Polymer Mater. 2020;2:515–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00948.
Gholami R, Solimannejad M. A computational DFT insight into adsorption properties of urea and creatinine molecules on pristine B24O24 nanocluster. Struct Chem. 2023;34:577–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-022-01998-w.
Karimi K, Rahsepar M. Optimization of the urea removal in a wearable dialysis device using nitrogen-doped and phosphorus-doped graphene. ACS Omega. 2022; 7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05495.
Yildiz T, Erucar I. Revealing the performance of bio-MOFs for adsorption-based uremic toxin separation using molecular simulations. Chem Eng J. 2022; 431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134263.
Dalman LH. Ternary systems of urea and acids. I. Urea, nitric acid and water. II. Urea, sulfuric acid and water. III. Urea, oxalic acid and water. J Am Chem Soc. 1934;56:549–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01318a010.
Das Gupta PK, Moulik SP. Interaction of urea with weak acids and water. J Phys Chemy. 1987;91:5826–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100306a061.
Paleckiene R, Sviklas A, Slinksiene R. Reaction of urea with citric acid. Russ J Appl Chem. 2005;78:1651–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11167-005-0579-2.
Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, Argiles A, Baurmeister U, Brunet P, et al. European Uremic Toxin Work, Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1934–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00924.x.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21978060, 22005080).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, Y., Jiang, Y., Mou, Y. et al. Synthesis and urea adsorption capacity of a strong, acidic hollow nanoparticle. Polym J 56, 553–560 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00884-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00884-y