Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Review
  • Published:

Development of a spray-type adhesion barrier

Abstract

We developed a novel spray-type dextrin hydrogel-based adhesion barrier designed to create a site-specific barrier on a target. Our novel hydrogel is composed of Powder A, which mainly contains N-hydroxysuccinimide-modified carboxymethyl dextrin and trehalose as a stabilizing agent, and Powder B, which is composed of sodium carbonate and sodium hydrogen carbonate. Here, we describe the product specifications of the hydrogel and results of in vivo performance evaluations and clinical studies to demonstrate its efficacy and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pillai CKS, Sharma CP. Review paper: absorbable polymeric surgical sutures: chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and performance. J Biomater Appl. 2010;25:29–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim M, Oommen B, Ross SW, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, Heniford BT, et al. The current status of biosynthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:114–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spotnitz WD, Burks S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion. 2008;48:1502–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohya Y. Temperature-responsive biodegradable injectable polymer systems with conveniently controllable properties. Polym J. 2019;51:997–1005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uyama H. Functional polymers from renewable plant oils. Polym J. 2018;50:1003–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DeWilde RL, Trew G, on behalf of the Expert Adhesions Working Party of the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Gynecol Surg. 2007;4:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1476–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Clark D, Boyd JH, Finlayson AR, Knight AD, Crowe AM, on behalf of the Surgical and Clinical Research (SCAR) Group. Adhesion-related readmissions following gynaecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24,046 patients. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1877–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:855–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DeWilde TG, on behalf of the Expert Adhesions Working Party of the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Part 2—steps to reduce adhesions. Gynecol Surg. 2007;4:243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. diZerega GS. Contemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:219–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodgers KE, diZerega GS. Developing pharmacologic agents for adhesion prevention. In: diZerega GS, editor. Peritoneal surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000. p. 441–57.

  13. Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA, O'Flynn H, Dias S, Metwally M, et al. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD001298.

    Google Scholar 

  14. El-Mowafi DM, Diamond MP. Are pelvic adhesions preventable? Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:222–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg. 1997;577:32–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Awonuga AO, Saed GM, Diamond MO. Laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: adhesion development, prevention, and use of adjunctive therapies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:412–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, et al. Reduction in adhesive small bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383:48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trew G, Pistofidis G, Pados G, Lower A, Mettler L, Wallwiener D, et al. Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2015–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Keller B, Yawalkar N, Pichler C, Braathen LR, Hunger RE. Hypersensitivity reaction against patent blue during sentinel lymph node removal in three melanoma patients. Am J Surg. 2007;193:122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kinoshita K. A novel instrument and technique for using Seprafilm hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16:497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chuang YC, Lu HF, Peng FS, Ting WH, Tu FC, Chen MJ, et al. Modified novel technique for improving the success rate of applying seprafilm by using laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:787–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kusuki I, Suganuma I, Ito F, Akiyama M, Sasaki A, Yamanaka K, et al. Usefulness of moistening seprafilm before use in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:e13–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verco SJ, Peers EM, Brown CB, Rodgers KE, Roda N, diZerega G. Development of a novel glucose polymer solution (icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: pre-clinical studies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1764–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown CB, Luciano AA, Martin D, Peers E, Scrimgeour A, diZerega GS, Adept Adhesion Reduction Study Group. Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1413–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kai M, Maeda K, Tasaki M, Kira S, Nakamura S, Chino N, et al. Evaluation of a spray-type, novel dextrin hydrogel adhesion barrier under laparoscopic conditions in a porcine uterine horn adhesion model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;25:447–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cezar C, Korell M, Tchartchian G, Ziegler N, Senshu K, Herrmann A, et al. How to avoid risks for patients in minimal-access trials: avoiding complications in clinical first-in-human studies by example of the ADBEE study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;35:84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cezar C, Tchartchian G, Korell M, Ziegler N, Senshu K, De Wilde MS, et al. Long term follow-up concerning safety and efficacy of novel adhesion prophylactic agent for laparoscopic myomectomy in the prospective randomized ADBEE study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;35:97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suto T, Watanabe M, Endo T, Komori K, Ohue M, Kanemitsu Y, et al. The primary result of prospective randomized multicenter trial of new spray-type bio-absorbable adhesion barrier system (TCD-11091) against postoperative adhesion formation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:1683–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all those who collaborated and supported this research and for “The Award of the Society of Polymer Science, Japan (Technology) 2017” awarded by the Society of Polymer Science, Japan, for this study, “Development of a spray-type adhesion barrier”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naotaka Chino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chino, N., Ishihara, H., Niimi, T. et al. Development of a spray-type adhesion barrier. Polym J 52, 473–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0306-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0306-0

Search

Quick links