DNA N6-methyladenine (6mA) modification is common in prokaryotes1 and eukaryotes,2 involving in gene regulation, transposon, stem cell differentiation, and human tumors. At present, it has been confirmed that 6mA is ubiquitous in the human genome, and [G/C]AGG[C/T] is the most prominent motif for 6mA modification.3 Human ALKBH1 (hALKBH1), one of the nine human homologs of the AlkB family, is an Fe(II) and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)-dependent dioxygenase and highly conserved in mammals. AlkB family proteins can repair damaged DNA/RNA or other lesions. hALKBH1 exhibits demethylation activity toward 6mA, and its abnormal expression has been found in many human cancers and developmental defects, such as tissue malformation and gender imbalance.3,4,5 DNA methyltransferase N6AMT1 and demethylase hALKBH1 mediate the methylation and demethylation of DNA 6mA in the human genome, respectively. The abnormal distribution of 6mA has been found in many cancers.3,4 Interestingly, hALKBH1 is also reported to have demethylation activity toward other four kinds of substrates, such as histone H2A,6 m3C on DNA and RNA,7 m5C or m1A on tRNA.8,9,10 Therefore, the molecular function of hALKBH1 is still controversial and the functional mechanism is unclear. In addition, the sequence identity between hALKBH1 and other solved structures is less than 19%, which hinders the understanding of action mechanism and the potential drug applications.
Here we determined two crystal structures of binary and ternary complex of hALKBH119–369, hALKBH119–369-Mn2+ and hALKBH119–369-Mn2+-α-KG at resolutions of 1.97 and 2.8 Å, respectively (Supplementary information, Fig. S1 and Table S1). hALKBH119–369 (referred to as hALKBH1 hereafter) contained the enzymatically active center and retained full demethylation activity toward 6mA ssDNA, but not toward 6mA on dsDNA or m1A on ssDNA, the same as hALKBH1 WT (Fig. 1a, b). The overall structures of hALKBH1-Mn2+-α-KG and hALKBH1-Mn2+ are similar, with root mean square deviation of 1.4 Å. The hALKBH1 contains a unique N-terminal Flip0, the nucleotide recognition lid (NRL, containing Flip1 and Flip2), and the central catalytic core. A highly conservative double-stranded β-helix (DSBH) fold in the catalytic core is a characteristic of the α-KG-dependent dioxygenase superfamily (Fig. 1c; Supplementary information, Fig. S2). Four antiparallel β-strands β7, β9, β12, and β14 form the major sheet, whereas β8, β10, β11 and β13 form the minor sheet. hALKBH1 has a conservative HxD…H metal ion-binding sequence and an R…R α-KG-binding sequence. Apart from Mn2+, α-KG is further stabilized by three hydrogen bonds formed by the side chains of Asn220, Asn340 and Tyr222 as well as three salt bridges formed by Arg338 and Arg344 (Fig. 1d, e). Isothermal titration calorimetry analysis of the hALKBH1-α-KG interaction revealed a dissociation constant (Kd) of 4.5 μM and a 1:1 stoichiometry (Supplementary information, Fig. S3b). The total surface area of hALKBH1 decreased obviously from 14,445 to 13,893 Å2 during the addition of α-KG, indicating that hALKBH1 whole structure shrank with the association of α-KG, which caused many conformational changes including those of active sites, β5, β8, Flip1 and Flip2 (Supplementary information, Movie S1, Fig.S3c, d). Moreover, of the eight catalytic residues, Arg344 and Tyr222 showed significant conformational changes, interacting with α-KG through moving 2.5 Å and 2.3 Å toward the active center, respectively. Besides, Tyr184 and Glu236 of Flip2 exhibited the most obvious conformational changes and moved to Arg344, forming a stabilization triangle by hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1d). The stability triangle of Tyr184-Arg344-Glu236 near the α-KG-binding site is essential for 6mA ssDNA demethylation activity. Any single mutation of the triangle abolished the demethylation activity (Fig. 1e, f), but did not reduce the DNA-binding affinity (Supplementary information, S3e). Interestingly, these large conformational changes induced by α-KG were not observed in other AlkB members,11,12,13,14 revealing a novel function of the essential triangle as a scaffold for the catalytic activity of hALKBH1.
Compared with other members of the AlkB family, the NRL of hALKBH1 has several unique structural features (Supplementary information, S4). The hALKBH1 Flip1 region is unique and long, leaving a larger binding space over the active site pocket (Fig. 1g). K158A/R159A/R160A/R162A and K167A/R169A mutants completely lost the 6mA demethylation activity, and the activity of K158A/R159A/R160A mutant was significantly compromised (Fig.1h). Moreover, the Flip2 contains a pair of antiparallel β-sheets and a long loop with high B factors (Supplementary information, Fig. S5). Structure-based sequence analyses and mutagenesis experiments confirmed that key residues in the NRL region, such as Arg169, Trp170, Tyr177, and Trp179, are potential determinants of hALKBH1 for 6mA recognition and demethylation (Fig. 1i; Supplementary information, Fig. S6). The distinctive composition and conformation of Flip1 and Flip2 are likely to confer substrate selectivity on hALKBH1.
Intriguingly, a significant structural feature of hALKBH1 at the N-terminus is the Flip0 (residues 19–32). It is highly conserved in ALKBH1 among various mammalian species, but not in OsALKBH115 or other AlkB family members (Fig. 1j; Supplementary information, Fig. S7). When superimposed with the hALKBH2-dsDNA complex structure, the Flip0 region of hALKBH1 is well accommodated by the modified strand, and the modified nucleotide enters the catalytic pocket. However, Flip0 seriously collides with the unmethylated strand (Fig. 1k). We hypothesized that Flip0 impedes the access of paired dsDNA to the active site and this may be the structural basis for the selectivity of hALKBH1 toward single-stranded substrates. EMSA data revealed that dsDNA and ssDNA can bind to hALKBH1, and EMSA and chromatographic analyses showed a direct binding between Flip0 and ssDNA/dsDNA (Supplementary information, Figs. S8 and S9). However, hALKBH1 has no demethylation activity on 6mA of dsDNA. Based on the above results, we believe that Flip0 is disadvantageous for 6mA dsDNA to enter the hALKBH1 catalytic pocket, and that dsDNA and hALKBH1 are a non-productive combination in the presence of Flip0, rather than a productive way. Flip0 binds tightly adjacent to the minor sheet of the DSBH fold, and most of the interactions are hydrophobic with all the involved hydrophobic residues conserved in ALKBH1 proteins of different species except for OsALKBH1 (Supplementary information, Fig. S7a). R24A/K25A, R28A/R31A, R24A/K25A/R28A/R31A mutants and Flip0-deleted mutant hALKBH136–369 completely lost demethylation activity toward 6mA ssDNA (Fig. 1l). Therefore, the unique Flip0 is essential for hALKBH1 activity and discriminating single-stranded from paired double-stranded substrates. This structural characteristic and function of hALKBH1 Flip0 are greatly different from those of Flip3 in hALKBH5 (Fig. 1j),11 whose structure can be disrupted by reduction of the disulfide bond. So hALKBH1 uses a novel substrate recognition mechanism that is distinct from those of known AlkB demethylases.
Next, we examined the surface charge distribution of hALKBH1. The region of positive charge extends along with Flip1, Flip0, and Flip2 near the active center of the DSBH domain, and forms a large substrate-binding groove. Combining the substrate-binding ability and catalytic activity of hALKBH1 mutants with mutations in Flip0, Flip1 and Flip2 regions, a possible binding model of hALKBH1 with ssDNA is proposed: one end of single-stranded nucleic acid interacts with Flip1, and the other end extends along the direction of the groove formed by Flip2 and Flip0 (Supplementary information, Fig. S10d).
Compared with other AlkB family proteins (Supplementary information, Fig. S10b), the distribution of positive charges of hALKBH1 is different and the area is very large. The positive surface of hALKBH1 significantly exceeds that of ssDNA binding in the hALKBH1-ssDNA model. In addition, the demethylation activity of hALKBH1 on ssDNA is weak, probably because ssDNA is not the most suitable substrate. Based on structure, we introduced various substrates, such as hemi-methylated DNA bubble and bulge with different numbers of mismatched base pairs in the middle of double-stranded DNA (Fig. 1m; Supplementary information, Fig. S11). Because the HPLC method was not sensitive enough, we developed a high-throughput methylation-sensitive restriction digest assay to detect the demethylation activity of hALKBH1 toward DNA bubble/bulge. Among different DNA bubbles, hALKBH1 displayed the highest demethylation activity when the number of mismatched base pairs was 5–7. The demethylation activity of hALKBH1 on Bubble6 DNA was twice that toward ssDNA (Supplementary information, Fig. S12). Intriguingly, hALKBH1 had strongest activity on Bulge6 DNA (Fig. 1m–o). Similar results were obtained by using the method of HPLC (Fig. 1p–r; Supplementary information, Fig. S13). Furthermore, we tested the demethylation activity toward DNA bulge with 6mA at different mismatch position, and found that the activity was the highest at the third mismatched base pair. Notably, the demethylation activity of hALKBH1 to Bulge6 DNA was 3–4 folds relative to ssDNA (Fig. 1m–o; Supplementary information, Figs. S13 and S14), and the variation of hALKBH1 demethylation activity toward DNA bulge/bubble, ssDNA or dsDNA was not due to different binding affinities between substrates and hALKBH1 (Supplementary information, Fig. S15). Therefore, structure-based substrate screening reveals that DNA bubble/bulge is more suitable for hALKBH1. The 6mA demethylation activity of hALKBH5 on dsDNA, ssDNA, DNA bubble and bulge was also assayed. hALKBH5 is a member of the AlkB family, and is also a Fe(II)/2-OG-dependent dioxygenase. Results showed that when the substrate was Bubble6 or Bulge6, the 6mA demethylation activity of hALKBH5 was 41% or 52.5% of that toward ssDNA, respectively (Supplementary information, Fig. S16). Therefore, DNA bubble and bulge are specific substrates for hALKBH1.
Based on the binding and activity assays (Supplementary information, Fig. S17), we presented hypothetical structural models of hALKBH1-Bubble6 DNA and hALKBH1-Bulge6 DNA (Fig. 1s, t). The length of the substrate-binding groove is ~40 Å, suitable for binding 5–7-nt bubble-structured DNA, consistent with the experimental results. The opening of the bubble structure promotes the binding and makes the 6mA insert deeper into the active center (Fig. 1s). In the hALKBH1-Bulge6 DNA binding model, the double-stranded DNA extends along the groove formed by Flip0, Flip1, and Flip2. The Bulge6 DNA binds to the Flip1 and Flip2 near the active pocket (Fig. 1t). The conformation allows a DNA circle with diameter less than 12 Å, consistent with the experimental result that hALKBH1 displayed the highest activity toward 6-nt bulge-structured DNA. In this binding model, 6mA at the third mismatched base pairs is more suitable to penetrate into the active center. Compared with ssDNA, partly unpaired dsDNA is more biologically relevant in genomic DNA, such as in mismatch repair. Our structure-based substrate screening reveals that DNA bulge and bubble, rather than ssDNA, are preferential substrates of hALKBH1 and have more physiological significance. Further investigations are required to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanism.
In summary, our research revealed several unique structural features of hALKBH1 and found its novel native substrates. Our findings can further be used to study the regulatory mechanism of 6mA modification in different basic biological processes and in the field of DNA epigenetics, to guide future drug research.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors of the hALKBH1-Mn2+-α-KG and hALKBH1-Mn2+ complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession code 6IE2 and 6IE3.
Wion, D. & Casadesus, J. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 183–192 (2006).
Luo, G. Z. et al. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 705–710 (2015).
Xiao, C. L. et al. Mol. Cell 71, 306–318 (2018).
Xie, Q. et al. Cell 175, 1228–1244 (2018).
Wu, T. P. et al. Nature 532, 329–333 (2016).
Ougland, R. et al. Stem Cells 30, 2672–2682 (2012).
Westbye, M. P. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 25046–25056 (2008).
Haag, S. et al. EMBO J. 35, 2104–2119 (2016).
Kawarada, L. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 7401–7415 (2017).
Liu, F. et al. Cell 167, 816–828 (2016).
Feng, C. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 11571–11583 (2014).
Yang, C. G. et al. Nature 452, 961–965 (2008).
Zhu, C. X. & Yi, C. Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3659–3662 (2014).
Zhang, X. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 116, 2919–2924 (2019).
Zhou, C. et al. Nat. Plants 4, 554–563 (2018).
We thank Prof. Dong-Cai Liang and Wenqing Xu for their advice and support throughout the project. We also thank Prof. Gongyi Zhang and Shaodong Dai for critical reading. We thank the staff of the beamlines BL19U1 and BL17U at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for assistance during data collection. We also thank Yuanyuan Chen and Zhenwei Yang for help with ITC and Octet analyses at Protein science research platform of Institute of Biophysics. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 31570794, 31872713, 31629002 and 31371310; the Chinese Academy of Sciences Pilot Strategic Science and Technology Projects B Grants XDB08010300; Extramural Scientists of State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology Grant [2019SKLAB6-14].
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, LF., Liu, YP., Chen, L. et al. Structural basis of nucleic acid recognition and 6mA demethylation by human ALKBH1. Cell Res 30, 272–275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-019-0233-9
This article is cited by
Nature Chemical Biology (2022)
Reducing N6AMT1-mediated 6mA DNA modification promotes breast tumor progression via transcriptional repressing cell cycle inhibitors
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
Nature Chemical Biology (2022)
Nature Reviews Genetics (2022)
Nature Reviews Cancer (2021)