Abstract
Therapy resistance remains a huge challenge for current breast cancer treatments. Exploring molecular mechanisms of therapy resistance might provide therapeutic targets for patients with advanced breast cancer and improve their prognosis. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play an important role in regulating therapy resistance. Here we summarize the functions of RBPs, highlight their tremendously important roles in regulating therapy sensitivity and resistance and we also reveal current therapeutic approaches reversing abnormal functions of RBPs in breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
RBPs exert their regulatory roles in several biological processes.
-
Dysregulation of RBPs is involved in therapy resistance of breast cancer.
-
Therapeutic approaches targeting key RBPs can reverse therapy resistance of breast cancer.
Open questions
-
What are the differences between canonical RBPs and noncanonical RBPs?
-
What are the mechanisms of action of RBPs involved in therapy resistance of breast cancer?
-
Would the combination of chemotherapy and approaches reversing abnormality of RBPs improve prognosis of breast cancer patients?
Introduction
Based on the latest global cancer statistics, breast cancer (BC) had become the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among female worldwide [1]. Although novel chemotherapies, targeted therapies and anti-cancer drugs for BC are continually being updated, drug resistance still occurs and is now the main cause of death for BC patients [2, 3]. Up to now, BC can be classified into three subtypes: hormone receptor (HR)-positive subtype, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- overexpressing subtype and triple-negative subtype based on HR and HER2 status [4]. Drug resistance is a main reason for cancer therapy failure, but the potential mechanisms are not yet fully understood [5]. Endocrine therapy, as a standard treatment for HR-positive patients, has achieved remarkable success, but there are about 20–30% of patients developing endocrine therapy resistance [6]. These endocrine therapy-resistant cancer cells are either intrinsically resistant phenotype or developing acquired resistance after long-time exposure [6]. HER2-amplified subtype accounts for 20% of BC. The combination of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy serves as a standard treatment for HER2-amplified subtype [7]. Around 25% of advanced HER2-overexpressing BC patients present with primary resistance or develop acquired resistance to HER2-directed treatments [8]. HER2-directed treatment resistance will lead to short progress free survival and overall survival [9]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the absence of HR and HER2. It easily relapses and often progresses to an advanced stage because of therapy resistance [10]. Therefore, it is of great importance to explore the mechanisms of conventional treatment resistance of BC.
Proteins that directly interact with RNA are defined as RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). RBPs can bind with RNAs to form ribonucleoprotein complex to adjust gene expression post-transcriptionally [11, 12]. RBPs are involved in regulating several processes such as RNA alternative splicing, RNA decay, RNA translation, RNA translocation and so on. Over the last decades, researches have shown that dysregulation of RBPs contributes to cancer treatment resistance. RBPs can regulate endocrine therapy resistance, chemotherapy resistance, targeted therapy resistance and immunotherapy resistance by conducting RNA alternative splicing, RNA decay, RNA translation, RNA translocation and other mechanisms [11]. Consequently, exploring mechanisms of drug resistance induced by abnormalities of RBPs may provide a potential approach to improve the prognosis of BC [13].
In this review, we summarize the functions of RBPs, emphasize their regulatory roles in treatment resistance and discuss RBPs as potential targets for BC treatment.
Characteristics of RNA binding protein
RBP is endowed with the ability to bind with RNA through special sequences within its molecular structure. There are several online databases to classify eukaryotic RBPs and we summarize these resources in Table 1. RBPs can be classified into canonical and noncanonical RBPs depending on the existence of identified RNA-binding domains (RBDs). RBDs are the functional units responsible for RNA binding. By employing different types of RBDs cooperatively or independently, RBPs will enjoy increased binding to different types of RNAs with enhanced RNA binding affinity as well as specificity [14]. Canonical RBPs recognize sequence-specific RNA motifs through their RBDs. Here we present several classical RBDs including RNA recognition motif (RRM), K homology (KH) domain, double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) and zinc finger domain.
RRM
RRM, also known as ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence, is the most abundant and the best characterized RBD [15]. In Protein Data Base, over 500 structures of RRMs are characterized [15]. A typical RRM consists of 80–90 amino acids and folds into a β1α1β2β3α2β4 topology that forms two α-helices against a four-stranded antiparallel β-sheet, where the RNA recognition usually occurs [16]. RRM-containing proteins bind to diverse RNAs by recognizing 2–8 nucleotides of a single-stranded RNA [17]. Each RRM has its own sequence preferences. Fused in sarcoma family proteins are comprised of RRMs, prion-like domains and other RBDs such as zinc finger domain [18]. The combination of RRMs with other domains allows the binding between fused in sarcoma family proteins and a wide range of nucleic acids in a length-dependent manner [19, 20].
KH domain
KH domain has a conserved GxxG loop which links two α-helices and β-strands. KH domain binds to polypyrimidine or A/C-rich RNAs with high affinity [21]. KH domain typically recognizes 4 nucleotides of RNAs. Besides, a single RBP can have repeated KH domains to increase binding. For example, vigilins are characterized by the presence of 14 or 15 KH domains and vigilins bind to nucleic acids promiscuously, including transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs, non-coding RNAs, and mitochondrial RNAs [22, 23].
dsRBD
dsRBD, which consists of ~65–70 amino acids, folds into a α1β1β2β3α2 structure forming an antiparallel β-sheet flanked by α-helices on one face [24]. The central role of dsRBD is to bind to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or highly structured RNAs [24]. RBPs with one or more dsRBDs interact with dsRNA by sensing the double helix RNA structures [24]. dsRBD-containing proteins include ribonuclease IIIs [25] and RNA-editing enzyme such as adenosine deaminases acting on RNA [26].
Zinc finger domain
Zinc finger domain is composed of around 30 amino acids and forms a simple ββα topology [27]. The residues in the β-hairpin and α-helix of ββα structure are coordinated by a Zn2+ ion [27]. Zinc finger domains are capable of binding a diverse range of molecules including DNA, RNA, protein and lipid [28]. The arrangements of cysteines (C) and histidines (H) such as CCHC, CCCH, CCCC and CCHH determines RNA-binding preference of zinc finger domains. For example, subtypes with multiple CCCH and CCCC are inclined to bind 3 nucleotides repeats of RNAs while subtypes with abundant CCHH interact with single-stranded RNAs as well as dsRNAs [28, 29].
As for noncanonical RBPs, several studies discovered a number of noncanonical RBPs which are characterized by the lack of established RBDs [30]. It was challenging to discover noncanonical RBPs without bias because of their lack of RBDs. Since limitations have been overcome with the development of system-wide approaches, numerous noncanonical RBPs have been identified [31]. For instance, a E3 ligase Tripartite Motif 25 interacts with RNA and functions as an RNA-specific RBP cofactor to mediate RNA uridylation [32]. These noncanonical RBPs bind with RNAs via intrinsically disordered regions or mononucleotide- or dinucleotide-binding domains with low sequence complexity [33].
The function of RBPs
In the following, we introduce functions of RBPs and briefly describe the regulatory processes (Fig. 1).
Pre-mRNAs alternative splicing (AS)
Since coding genes of eukaryotes are composed of exons and introns, their initial transcript precursors undergo AS to remove introns, even some exons in some cases, to generate mature mRNAs [34]. Representative alternative splicing RBPs include serine/arginine-rich (SR) family proteins and hnRNP proteins [35]. Classical SRs bind with RNAs through their RRM domains. Besides, they can also bind to proteins through their serine-rich (RS) enriched C terminal domain [36]. SR proteins facilitates selection of splice site and recruitment of spliceosomal components through recognizing and binding to exonic splicing enhancers [37]. SR proteins can also regulate splicing by interacting with hnRNP proteins [38]. HnRNPs repress splicing by binding to exonic splicing silencers and hindering exon recognition [39].
mRNA alternative polyadenylation (APA)
APA process adds a poly (A) tail to 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs through polyadenylation machinery, a critical process to generate mature mRNA transcripts. Components of the APA machinery are mainly comprised of several RBPs such as cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor, cleavage stimulation factor, cleavage factor I and cleavage factor II [40]. A number of RBPs have been identified to regulate APA [41]. Except mentioned RBPs, other RBPs such as hnRNPs and SR proteins can also regulate splicing and polyadenylation of mRNAs [35].
RNA modifications
The process of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification as well as functions of m6A are regulated by RBPs. YTH domain-containing protein family members, including YTHDC1–2 and YTHDF1–3, which share the m6A-recognizing YTH domain, are the most studied m6A readers [42]. YTHDC1, which mainly localizes in the nucleus, regulates RNA transportation and pre-mRNA splicing [43, 44]. YTHDC2, which is ubiquitous in cell cytoplasm, regulates RNA stability and translation [45, 46]. In addition, other proteins such as hnRNPA2/B1 can directly bind to a set of m6A bearing pre-mRNAs, elicits mRNA stability and alternative splicing [47].
RNA stability
RBPs can also regulate RNA stability. Removal of the 5′ cap structure or the 3′ poly (A) tail initiates mRNA degradation process [48]. Up to 8% of mRNA transcripts contain AU-rich elements (AREs) which often reside within 3′ UTR [49]. ARE-related RBPs can recognize AREs and bind with AREs to regulate mRNA stability. For instance, ARE-related RBPs such as AU-binding factor 1 (AUF1), tristetraprolin and human antigen R (HuR) can regulate mRNA degradation or stabilize mRNAs by binding with AREs of corresponding mRNAs [50].
RNA localization
RNA molecules dwell in specific subcellular locations. Some RBPs affect intercellular localization of target RNAs. Generally, RBPs can recognize and bind to specific sequence in the UTR of target RNAs. After binding, these RBPs recruit and assemble multi-subunit complexes to connect RNAs to cytoskeletal molecular motors, and transport the RNA-protein complexes to their destinations [51]. As a result, dysregulated RBP/RNA complex may disrupt target RNA localization patterns.
Translational regulation
RBPs play important roles in different stages of translation including translation initiation, elongation, and termination [52]. The binding between RBPs and 5′ UTR or 3′ UTR of mRNAs will result in varying translation efficiency [52]. Besides, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) can reside in 5′ UTR of mRNAs. RBPs such as IRES transacting factors bind to IRES to trigger translation in a cap structure-independent way [53].
The involvement of RBPs in treatment resistance of BC
Systemic therapies for BC are comprised of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy and other approaches. For chemotherapy, the chemotherapeutic agents for treatment of BC include paclitaxel, platinum and anthracyclines in the clinical setting [54]. For endocrine therapy, options include selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators such as tamoxifen, selective ER down regulators such as fulvestrant, and aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole or anastrozole [55]. For targeted therapy, targeted drugs include anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies, HER2 antibodies conjunct cytotoxic agents, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, small molecule targeting CDK4/6 and poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitors [56, 57]. Recent studies uncover RBP-mediated regulation of therapy resistance in BC. A table is provided to summarize the alteration of these RBPs in the treatment resistance of BC (Table 2). Schematic diagram of representative RBPs involving in treatment resistance of BC is shown in Fig. 2.
RBPs regulate chemotherapy resistance of BC
Chemotherapy resistance contributes to BC progression. Anthracyclines are commonly used cytotoxic drugs for BC treatment. Acquired anthracycline resistance is a huge hurdle in BC therapy efficacy. There are several RBPs regulating treatment response of doxorubicin. Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3/IMP3) depletion substantially reduces the mRNA of ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 which functions as an efflux transporter of doxorubicin and then leads to doxorubicin re-sensitivity [58]. HuR has been implicated in the post-transcriptional control of mRNA turnover and stability [59]. HuR has three RRMs and it preferentially interacts with ARE-containing mRNAs [59, 60]. Upon doxorubicin stimulation, HuR is phosphorylated and the phosphorylated HuR regulates doxorubicin target topoisomerase IIa post-transcriptionally to maintain DNA topology and then decreases the efficacy of doxorubicin [61, 62]. HnRNPA2, a RBP proved to regulate AS and RNA stability, plays a critical role in doxorubicin resistance. Repression of hnRNPA2 by a dietary compound apigenin can decrease the expression of efflux transporters ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 4 and ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 to induce apoptosis which will promote sensitization of TNBC to doxorubicin [63]. Upregulation of RNA binding motif single stranded interacting protein 2 enhances the sensitivity of BC cells to doxorubicin, while inhibition of this RBP has an opposite trend. Motif single stranded interacting protein 2 positively regulates the expression of Bcl-2 modifier and increases the expression of cleaved caspase 3, cleaved caspase 9 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase which in turn contributes to doxorubicin sensitivity [64]. Epirubicin is another anthracycline agent widely used for BC treatment. A novel TNBC-specific RBP, non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein (NONO) belongs to the family of Drosophila behavior human splicing [65]. NONO functions in RNA processing, RNA transcription, and DNA repair in cancer [65]. NONO regulates signal transducer and activator transcription 3 post-transcriptionally by binding with its mRNA and the upregulation of NONO causes epirubicin resistance [66]. High expression of eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF5A2 correlates with decreased doxorubicin sensitivity while silencing of eIF5A2 significantly enhances doxorubicin toxicity [67]. Moreover, there are some RBPs regulating multi-drug resistance. Eukaryotic translation initiation factors have also been shown to play a crucial role in muti-agent resistance. Silencing of eIF4E results in suppression of TNBC growth and sensitization of BC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs of cisplatin, adriamycin, paclitaxel and docetaxel [68].
RBPs regulate endocrine therapy resistance of BC
Endocrine therapy has been shown to improve outcome of BC patients. However, about 20% of the patients develop endocrine therapy resistance [69]. Abundant evidence shows that RBPs can regulate endocrine therapy resistance [70]. Tumor cells can develop tamoxifen resistance through overexpression or activation of co-activator of ER, suppression of ER or acquiring ER mutation [71]. ESR1 encodes ER protein. Protein-associated splicing factor closely associates with poor prognosis of ER-positive BC patients and it regulates tamoxifen resistance by up-regulating ERα expression via exporting ESR1 mRNA from the nucleus to cytoplasm [72]. Knockdown of protein-associated splicing factor also promotes nuclear accumulation of sec1 family domain containing 2, transformer-2 protein homolog beta, suggesting protein-associated splicing factor is a controller of RNA subcellular localization [72]. Similarly, accumulation of HuR in cytoplasm associates with the emergence of tamoxifen resistance. HER2 elevation is one of the characteristics of tamoxifen-resistant ER-positive BC [73]. HuR interacts with 3′ UTR of HER2 transcripts to increase stability of HER2 mRNAs which causes up-regulation of HER2 protein and contributes to tamoxifen resistance [74]. Abnormalities of RBPs also associate with fulvestrant resistance. HnRNPA2/B1 can regulate ERα by stabilizing and increasing splicing efficiency of ESR1 transcript and trafficking it to the cytoplasm for translation [75]. Under this circumstance, overexpressing hnRNPA2/B1 promotes MCF-7 cell migration and invasion and attenuates endocrine-sensitivity to ER antagonists [75]. According to silico Meta Core network analysis in another research, it is confirmed that transient overexpression of hnRNPA2/B1 promotes processing of pre-miRNAs, which activates TGFβ signaling to induce tamoxifen and fulvestrant resistance [76]. Interestingly, ERα itself is found to be a potent noncanonical RBP which controls RNA metabolism. ERα distributes in cytoplasm and nucleus. In cytoplasm, ERα directly binds with over 1000 mRNAs through a putative RBD located in its hinge region [77]. ERα contributes to endocrine therapies because ERα regulates the AS of X-box binding protein, myeloid cell leukemia 1 and eIF4G2 which are essential for overcoming cellular stress induced by endocrine therapies [77].
RBPs regulate targeted therapy resistance of BC
AUF1 has been identified to regulate trastuzumab resistance by enhancing HER2 mRNA translation. In acquired trastuzumab-resistant BC cells, trastuzumab treatment will lead to the binding between AUF1 and HER2 mRNA which activates the translation of HER2 and induces trastuzumab resistance [78]. Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) participates in mRNA splicing and translation by functioning as a RBP [79]. Phosphorylated YB-1 is an active form of YB-1. When it is not phosphorylated, it binds with messenger ribonucleoprotein particles that inhibit mRNA translation [80]. Once phosphorylated, YB-1 permits the translation of mRNAs of target genes [80]. Phosphorylated YB-1 intensely binds with HER2 mRNA transcript and significantly increases HER2 mRNA translation which will hamper the treatment efficacy of anti-HER2 targeted therapy [81, 82]. Translation repressor eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) can be phosphorylated by mTOR. When phosphorylated by mTOR, 4E-BP1 dissociates from eIF4E complex. After 4E-BP1 is phosphorylated, eIF4F complex conducts translation of specific mRNAs such as CXC chemokine receptor 4 to promote anti-HER2 resistance [83, 84]. RNA-binding motif protein 6 (RBM6), a well-known RBP regulating mRNA AS, is commonly altered in treatment-resistant BC cells [85]. RBM6 controls the AS of Fe65 and amyloid beta precursor protein binding family B member 1 which are essential components of a positive homologous recombination repair regulation complex. Fe65 is drastically decreased when RBM6 is knocked down and the ablation of Fe65 results in impaired homologous recombination of double-strand breaks. Therefore, RBM6-deficient cancer cells are susceptible to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition and exhibit sensitivity to cisplatin [86].
RBPs regulate immunotherapy therapy resistance of BC
Aberrant immune checkpoints helps cancer cells to escape immune attacks [87]. Since recent advances in immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors (CBIs), particularly, CBIs of targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 and program death receptor-1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1, immunotherapy appears to be a promising anti-cancer treatment [88]. However, a number of patients did not benefit from CBIs. Metastatic breast cancer patients have a low objective response rate to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy [89, 90]. This could attribute to the abnormal functions of RBPs.
Accumulating evidence shows that RBPs are crucial regulators of PD-L1 and participate in immunotherapy failure. Knockdown of RNA binding motif, single-stranded interacting protein 3 (RBMS3) significantly downregulates the mRNA and protein levels of PD-L1 while overexpression of RBMS3 decreases PD-L1 markedly. RBMS3 stabilizes mRNA of PD-L1 through binding to its AU-rich elements in the 3′ UTR. RBMS3 ablation facilitates anti-tumor T-cell immunity in TNBC [91]. HuR is dysregulated in BC and regulates tumor invasion and metastasis by interacting with a subset of oncogenic mRNAs. Studies show that HuR is also engaged in regulation of PD-L1 post-transcriptionally, as direct binding between HuR and PD-L1 mRNA was observed [92, 93]. In human BC cell lines, HuR knockout expedited PD-L1 mRNA decay and resulted in downregulation of PD-L1 protein level [92]. The protein level of PD-L1 in exosome was also decreased in HuR knockout clones [93]. Additionally, PD-L1 is found to be a downstream target of m6A modification mediated by methyltransferase like 3. M6A-modified PD-L1 mRNA facilitates the recruitment of IGF2BP3 to improve PD-L1 mRNA stability and promote the expression of PD-L1 [94]. Inhibition of methyltransferase like 3 or IGF2BP3 can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy through PD-L1-mediated T cell infiltration [94].
In addition to PD-L1, other factors could contribute to the immune-resistance of BC [95]. Metadherin, which is associated with poor prognosis of BC contributes to immunity evasion [96]. Tap1/2 is known as a crucial component of the antigen presentation machinery. Metadherin facilitates the binding between staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1 and Tap1/2 mRNA and promotes their degradation to hamper anti-tumor immunity [97]. Lin28 is a conserved RBP consisted of two subtypes: Lin28A and Lin28B. Lin28B has been shown to repress let-7 miRNAs by blocking let-7 precursors processing [98]. The role of let-7/Lin28 axis is involved in immunotherapy effectiveness. Upregulation of Lin28B induces BC cells to release low-let-7s-containing exosomes and suppresses the anti-cancer immunity in the pre-metastatic microenvironment [99].
Therapeutic approaches reversing abnormally expressed RBPs
Since RBPs are critical to cancer treatment resistance, therapeutic approaches reversing abnormal functions of RBPs involved in treatment resistance could restore breast cancer cell sensitivity to anti-cancer treatment. In this part, we show numerous tactics for targeting RBPs in BC and highlight some prospective innovative targeting schemes. (Table 3).
Small molecules
Small molecules are often employed to target RBPs. Several small molecular compounds are promising in reversing RBP-conducted treatment resistance. From mentioned above, aberrant expression of HuR is associated with therapy resistance. It regulates chemotherapy and endocrine therapy resistance in BC. Thus, a bunch of small molecular inhibitors targeting HuR have been developed. Compound azaphilone-9 targets HuR primarily by affecting a cluster of RNA-binding residues located near the inter-domain linker region of HuR. Therefore, it can interfere the interaction between HuR and ARE. Since HuR-ARE interactions are essential for stabilizing many mRNAs related to therapy resistance, this disruption could potentially reverse treatment resistance [100]. Dihydrotanshinone-I, derived from the fungal natural product, can disrupt the interaction between ARE and HuR by competing with the binding sites of HuR [101]. KY7123, known as a small molecular HuR inhibitor, can prevent the association between HuR and its target RNAs in vitro and in vivo [102]. EIF4E is involved in muti-treatment resistance as well. Antiviral guanosine analogue ribavirin is found to abrogate eIF4E-mRNA binding by masking the functional site of eIF4E [103]. N-7 Benzyl Guanosine Monophosphate Tryptamine Phosphoramidate Pronucleotide (4Ei-1) is another studied eIF4E inhibitor. 4Ei-1 treatment causes BC cells to re-sensitive to gemcitabine, because 4Ei-1 antagonizes mRNA cap binding ability of eIF4E and initiates eIF4E proteasomal degradation [104]. Musashi RNA binding protein 1 (MSI-1) can enhance treatment resistance by increasing expression of DNA repair-related proteins DNA-PKcs and EGFR [105]. A study employs a fluorescence polarization assay to screen out a small molecule named (-)-gossypol which occupies consensus RNA binding site of MSI-1 and disrupts the binding between MSI-1 and its target mRNAs [106]. Oleic acid binds to the RRM1 of MSI-1 protein and induces a conformational change that inhibits the binding between MSI-1 and its target mRNAs. Oleic acid can also inhibit cell proliferation by upregulating MSI-1 [107].
siRNAs-based tactics
Small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are used to target RBPs to reverse the abnormal expression of RBPs. siRNAs can bind with target genes and subsequently lead to gene silencing. siRNA-based therapies show efficacy and clinical safety during clinical practice. The efficacy of siRNAs has been investigated in several tumor types. After stably transfected with eIF4E-siRNA, cancer cells exhibit decreased levels of VEGF, FGF-2, and cyclinD1 expression. Besides, eIF4E-siRNA significantly inhibits cell growth and promotes cell death by activating caspase 3 in MCF-7 cells. The cytotoxicity of cisplatin is synergistically increased by RNAi-mediated downregulation of eIF4E expression both in vitro and in vivo. This suggests that cisplatin treatment would be more successful when combined with eIF4E-RNAi treatment [108]. Paclitaxel-resistant MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice are re-sensitized to a low dose of paclitaxel by intravenous injections of nanoparticles-loaded eIF4E siRNA [109]. Moreover, HuR siRNA leads to increased reactive oxidative stress and sensitizes TNBC cells to radiation [110]. Increased reactive oxidative stress production is associated with increased DNA damage which contributes to radiosensitivity [110]. Knockdown of HuR by siRNA delays tumor formation and inhibits tumor growth in MDA-MB-231 and SUM159 tumor-bearing mice [111].
Peptide-based strategy
Peptides enjoy several advantages such as their high specificity, selectivity, tiny size, easy modification and biocompatibility. Different peptides are being designed for cancer treatments and peptide-based strategy is used for reversing therapy resistance [112]. RBM38 can inhibit p53 translation via blocking eIF4E-mediated p53 mRNA translation. Pep8 (8 amino acid peptide) which mimics eIF4E key domain can mask RBM38 binding interface and effectively promote p53 translation, and potently increase p53 expression. Pep8 treatment inhibits tumor spheres growth, colonies formation and xenograft tumors by disrupting RBM38 function [113].
PROTACs-based strategy
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), which induce the degradation of proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome system, are engineered molecules that trigger the degradation of protein of interest [114]. Conventional PROTACs are comprised of three components: a ligand that recognizes protein of interest, a ligand that binds E3 ligase and a linker between them. RBPs are usually undruggable by traditional PROTACs [115]. A new type of PROTACs that can functionally target RBPs is termed RNA-PROTACs [116]. The overexpression of RBP Lin28 has been shown to inhibit the biogenesis of tumor suppressor miRNA let-7 through a direct interaction with pre-let-7 [98, 99]. Based on the established pre-let-7/Lin28 complex, the key partial sequence (AGGAGAU) of pre-let-7 that binds to zinc finger domain of Lin28 is conjugated to a E3-recruiting peptide and this RNA-PROTAC strategy mediates degradation of the Lin28 via the ubiquitination pathway [116]. The establishment of RNA-PROTACs provides a new therapeutic approach to tackle the difficulties of RBP-mediated therapeutic resistance. As RNA-PROTACs are inherently unstable in the presence of nucleases and/or proteases, nanoscale drug delivery systems might be introduced to protect RNA-PROTACs from decay, thereby increasing their biological efficiency in vivo [117].
Conclusion and perspectives
This review provides an overview of functions of RBPs involved in BC and highlights the important roles of RBPs in the regulation of BC treatment resistance. Both canonical and noncanonical RBPs recognize and interact with their target RNAs by forming RNP complex. RBP inhibitors in combination with other treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy and immunotherapy might be a promising therapeutic option for patients who have developed treatment resistance. Therefore, in recent years, RBP-targeted therapies will be attractive to reverse therapeutic resistance. However, on the whole, the complex regulatory network of RBPs is not fully explicit, and much further researches on the role of RBPs in BC are needed.
Data availability
All data included in this review are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.
References
Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021;397:1750–69.
Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL. Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:631–43.
Chen KG, Sikic BI. Molecular pathways: regulation and therapeutic implications of multidrug resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1863–9.
Nagarajan D, McArdle SEB. Immune Landscape of Breast Cancers. Biomedicines 2018;6:20.
Cote D, Eustace A, Toomey S, Cremona M, Milewska M, Furney S, et al. Germline single nucleotide polymorphisms in ERBB3 and BARD1 genes result in a worse relapse free survival response for HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant based docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH). PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0200996.
Merenbakh-Lamin K, Ben-Baruch N, Yeheskel A, Dvir A, Soussan-Gutman L, Jeselsohn R, et al. D538G mutation in estrogen receptor-alpha: A novel mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:6856–64.
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987;235:177–82.
Choong GM, Cullen GD, O’Sullivan CC. Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:355–74.
Gote V, Nookala AR, Bolla PK, Pal D. Drug Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Tumor Targeted Nanomedicine to the Rescue. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:4673.
Bai X, Ni J, Beretov J, Graham P, Li Y. Triple-negative breast cancer therapeutic resistance: Where is the Achilles’ heel? Cancer Lett. 2021;497:100–11.
Pereira B, Billaud M, Almeida R. RNA-Binding Proteins in Cancer: Old Players and New Actors. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:506–28.
Gerstberger S, Hafner M, Tuschl T. A census of human RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:829–45.
Yao ZT, Yang YM, Sun MM, He Y, Liao L, Chen KS, et al. New insights into the interplay between long non-coding RNAs and RNA-binding proteins in cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022;42:117–40.
Korn SM, Ulshofer CJ, Schneider T, Schlundt A. Structures and target RNA preferences of the RNA-binding protein family of IGF2BPs: An overview. Structure 2021;29:787–803.
Corley M, Burns MC, Yeo GW. How RNA-Binding Proteins Interact with RNA: Molecules and Mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2020;78:9–29.
Lunde BM, Moore C, Varani G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:479–90.
Auweter SD, Oberstrass FC, Allain FH. Sequence-specific binding of single-stranded RNA: is there a code for recognition? Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:4943–59.
Portz B, Lee BL, Shorter J. FUS and TDP-43 Phases in Health and Disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46:550–63.
Liu P, Wang Z, Ou X, Wu P, Zhang Y, Wu S, et al. The FUS/circEZH2/KLF5/feedback loop contributes to CXCR4-induced liver metastasis of breast cancer by enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:198.
Wang X, Schwartz JC, Cech TR. Nucleic acid-binding specificity of human FUS protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:7535–43.
Nicastro G, Taylor IA, Ramos A. KH-RNA interactions: back in the groove. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;30:63–70.
Siomi H, Matunis MJ, Michael WM, Dreyfuss G. The pre-mRNA binding K protein contains a novel evolutionarily conserved motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:1193–8.
Cheng MH, Jansen RP. A jack of all trades: the RNA-binding protein vigilin. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017;8:e1448.
Masliah G, Barraud P, Allain FH. RNA recognition by double-stranded RNA binding domains: a matter of shape and sequence. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:1875–95.
Abou Elela S, Ji X. Structure and function of Rnt1p: An alternative to RNAi for targeted RNA degradation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2019;10:e1521.
Minton K. ZBP1 induces immunopathology caused by loss of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:531.
Ngwa CJ, Farrukh A, Pradel G. Zinc finger proteins of Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Microbiol. 2021;23:e13387.
Lai WS, Carballo E, Thorn JM, Kennington EA, Blackshear PJ. Interactions of CCCH zinc finger proteins with mRNA. Binding of tristetraprolin-related zinc finger proteins to Au-rich elements and destabilization of mRNA. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17827–37.
Hall TM. Multiple modes of RNA recognition by zinc finger proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15:367–73.
Moore S, Jarvelin AI, Davis I, Bond GL, Castello A. Expanding horizons: new roles for non-canonical RNA-binding proteins in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;48:112–20.
Liao JY, Yang B, Zhang YC, Wang XJ, Ye Y, Peng JW, et al. EuRBPDB: a comprehensive resource for annotation, functional and oncological investigation of eukaryotic RNA binding proteins (RBPs). Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D307–13.
Choudhury NR, Nowak JS, Zuo J, Rappsilber J, Spoel SH, Michlewski G. Trim25 Is an RNA-Specific Activator of Lin28a/TuT4-Mediated Uridylation. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1265–72.
Castello A, Fischer B, Frese CK, Horos R, Alleaume AM, Foehr S, et al. Comprehensive Identification of RNA-Binding Domains in Human Cells. Mol Cell. 2016;63:696–710.
Biamonti G, Catillo M, Pignataro D, Montecucco A, Ghigna C. The alternative splicing side of cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;32:30–6.
Blake D, Lynch KW. The three as: Alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation and their impact on apoptosis in immune function. Immunol Rev. 2021;304:30–50.
Long JC, Caceres JF. The SR protein family of splicing factors: master regulators of gene expression. Biochem J. 2009;417:15–27.
Howard JM, Sanford JR. The RNAissance family: SR proteins as multifaceted regulators of gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2015;6:93–110.
Caceres JF, Stamm S, Helfman DM, Krainer AR. Regulation of alternative splicing in vivo by overexpression of antagonistic splicing factors. Science 1994;265:1706–9.
Zhu J, Mayeda A, Krainer AR. Exon identity established through differential antagonism between exonic splicing silencer-bound hnRNP A1 and enhancer-bound SR proteins. Mol Cell. 2001;8:1351–61.
Erson-Bensan AE, Can T. Alternative Polyadenylation: Another Foe in Cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2016;14:507–17.
Mitschka S, Mayr C. Context-specific regulation and function of mRNA alternative polyadenylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23:779–96.
Theler D, Dominguez C, Blatter M, Boudet J, Allain FH. Solution structure of the YTH domain in complex with N6-methyladenosine RNA: a reader of methylated RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:13911–9.
Roundtree IA, Luo GZ, Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhou T, Cui Y, et al. YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N(6)-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. Elife. 2017;6:e31311.
Roundtree IA, He C. Nuclear m(6)A Reader YTHDC1 Regulates mRNA Splicing. Trends Genet. 2016;32:320–1.
Mao Y, Dong L, Liu XM, Guo J, Ma H, Shen B, et al. m(6)A in mRNA coding regions promotes translation via the RNA helicase-containing YTHDC2. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5332.
Zhou B, Liu C, Xu L, Yuan Y, Zhao J, Zhao W, et al. N(6) -Methyladenosine Reader Protein YT521-B Homology Domain-Containing 2 Suppresses Liver Steatosis by Regulation of mRNA Stability of Lipogenic Genes. Hepatology 2021;73:91–103.
Liu Y, Shi SL. The roles of hnRNP A2/B1 in RNA biology and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2021;12:e1612.
Garneau NL, Wilusz J, Wilusz CJ. The highways and byways of mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:113–26.
Gruber AR, Fallmann J, Kratochvill F, Kovarik P, Hofacker IL. AREsite: a database for the comprehensive investigation of AU-rich elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D66–9.
Sidali A, Teotia V, Solaiman NS, Bashir N, Kanagaraj R, Murphy JJ, et al. AU-Rich Element RNA Binding Proteins: At the Crossroads of Post-Transcriptional Regulation and Genome Integrity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23:96.
Eliscovich C, Singer RH. RNP transport in cell biology: the long and winding road. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017;45:38–46.
Truitt ML, Ruggero D. New frontiers in translational control of the cancer genome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:332.
Durie D, Lewis SM, Liwak U, Kisilewicz M, Gorospe M, Holcik M. RNA-binding protein HuR mediates cytoprotection through stimulation of XIAP translation. Oncogene 2011;30:1460–9.
Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer Treatment. Jama 2019;321:316.
Burstein HJ. Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2557–70.
Loibl S, Gianni L. HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389:2415–29.
Bianchini G, De Angelis C, Licata L, Gianni L. Treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer - expanded options, evolving needs. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:91–113.
Samanta S, Pursell B, Mercurio AM. IMP3 protein promotes chemoresistance in breast cancer cells by regulating breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) expression. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:12569–73.
Wu X, Xu L. The RNA-binding protein HuR in human cancer: A friend or foe? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;184:114179.
Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M. Posttranscriptional regulation of cancer traits by HuR. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2010;1:214–29.
Latorre E, Castiglioni I, Gatto P, Carelli S, Quattrone A, Provenzani A. Loss of protein kinase Cdelta/HuR interaction is necessary to doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cell lines. J Pharm Exp Ther. 2014;349:99–106.
Srikantan S, Abdelmohsen K, Lee EK, Tominaga K, Subaran SS, Kuwano Y, et al. Translational control of TOP2A influences doxorubicin efficacy. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:3790–801.
Sudhakaran M, Parra MR, Stoub H, Gallo KA, Doseff AI. Apigenin by targeting hnRNPA2 sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer spheroids to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and regulates expression of ABCC4 and ABCG2 drug efflux transporters. Biochem Pharm. 2020;182:114259.
Xu F, Xia T, Xu QT, Zhang X, Huang YZ, Sun X, et al. RBMS2 Chemosensitizes Breast Cancer Cells to Doxorubicin by Regulating BMF Expression. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:1724–36.
Knott GJ, Bond CS, Fox AH. The DBHS proteins SFPQ, NONO and PSPC1: a multipurpose molecular scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:3989–4004.
Kim SJ, Ju JS, Kang MH, Eun JW, Kim YH, Raninga PV, et al. RNA-binding protein NONO contributes to cancer cell growth and confers drug resistance as a theranostic target in TNBC. Theranostics 2020;10:7974–92.
Liu Y, Du F, Chen W, Yao M, Lv K, Fu P. EIF5A2 is a novel chemoresistance gene in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2015;22:602–7.
Zhou FF, Yan M, Guo GF, Wang F, Qiu HJ, Zheng FM, et al. Knockdown of eIF4E suppresses cell growth and migration, enhances chemosensitivity and correlates with increase in Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2011;28:1302–7.
Hanker AB, Sudhan DR, Arteaga CL. Overcoming Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:496–513.
Wang MY, Huang HY, Kuo YL, Lo C, Sun HY, Lyu YJ, et al. TARBP2-Enhanced Resistance during Tamoxifen Treatment in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:210.
Yao J, Deng K, Huang J, Zeng R, Zuo J. Progress in the Understanding of the Mechanism of Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer. Front Pharm. 2020;11:592912.
Mitobe Y, Iino K, Takayama KI, Ikeda K, Suzuki T, Aogi K, et al. PSF Promotes ER-Positive Breast Cancer Progression via Posttranscriptional Regulation of ESR1 and SCFD2. Cancer Res. 2020;80:2230–42.
Shou J, Massarweh S, Osborne CK, Wakeling AE, Ali S, Weiss H, et al. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: increased estrogen receptor-HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:926–35.
Tan S, Ding K, Chong QY, Zhao J, Liu Y, Shao Y, et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of ERBB2 by miR26a/b and HuR confers resistance to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:13551–64.
Petri BJ, Piell KM, South Whitt GC, Wilt AE, Poulton CC, Lehman NL, et al. HNRNPA2B1 regulates tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-sensitivity and hallmarks of endocrine resistance in breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2021;518:152–68.
Klinge CM, Piell KM, Tooley CS, Rouchka EC. HNRNPA2/B1 is upregulated in endocrine-resistant LCC9 breast cancer cells and alters the miRNA transcriptome when overexpressed in MCF-7 cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9430.
Xu Y, Huangyang P, Wang Y, Xue L, Devericks E, Nguyen HG, et al. ERalpha is an RNA-binding protein sustaining tumor cell survival and drug resistance. Cell 2021;184:5215–29.e17.
Han M, Gu Y, Lu P, Li J, Cao H, Li X, et al. Exosome-mediated lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 promotes trastuzumab resistance through binding with AUF1 and activating ERBB2 translation. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:26.
Lyabin DN, Eliseeva IA, Ovchinnikov LP. YB-1 protein: functions and regulation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2014;5:95–110.
Alkrekshi A, Wang W, Rana PS, Markovic V, Sossey-Alaoui K. A comprehensive review of the functions of YB-1 in cancer stemness, metastasis and drug resistance. Cell Signal. 2021;85:110073.
Darb-Esfahani S, Loibl S, Muller BM, Roller M, Denkert C, Komor M, et al. Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R69.
McKernan CM, Khatri A, Hannigan M, Child J, Chen Q, Mayro B, et al. ABL kinases regulate translation in HER2+ cells through Y-box-binding protein 1 to facilitate colonization of the brain. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111268.
Silvera D, Formenti SC, Schneider RJ. Translational control in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:254–66.
Zindy P, Berge Y, Allal B, Filleron T, Pierredon S, Cammas A, et al. Formation of the eIF4F translation-initiation complex determines sensitivity to anticancer drugs targeting the EGFR and HER2 receptors. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4068–73.
Bechara EG, Sebestyen E, Bernardis I, Eyras E, Valcarcel J. RBM5, 6, and 10 differentially regulate NUMB alternative splicing to control cancer cell proliferation. Mol Cell 2013;52:720–33.
Machour FE, Abu-Zhayia ER, Awwad SW, Bidany-Mizrahi T, Meinke S, Bishara LA, et al. RBM6 splicing factor promotes homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks and modulates sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:11708–27.
Byun DJ, Wolchok JD, Rosenberg LM, Girotra M. Cancer immunotherapy - immune checkpoint blockade and associated endocrinopathies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:195–207.
Darvin P, Toor SM, Sasidharan Nair V, Elkord E. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: recent progress and potential biomarkers. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:1–11.
Nanda R, Chow LQ, Dees EC, Berger R, Gupta S, Geva R, et al. Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2460–7.
Emens LA, Cruz C, Eder JP, Braiteh F, Chung C, Tolaney SM, et al. Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:74–82.
Zhou Y, Liang Z, Xia Y, Li S, Liang J, Hu Z, et al. Disruption of RBMS3 suppresses PD-L1 and enhances antitumor immune activities and therapeutic effects of auranofin against triple-negative breast cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2023;369:110260.
Zhang Q, Zhe Y, Wu X, Lan L, Wei L, Xu L. Abstract 4173: Improve anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response in immunologically cold tumors by harnessing RNA-binding protein HuR. Cancer Res. 2022;82:4173.
Zhang Q, Wu X, Lan L, Wei L, Xu L. Abstract 1560: Targeting RNA-binding protein HuR to improve anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:1560.
Wan W, Ao X, Chen Q, Yu Y, Ao L, Xing W, et al. METTL3/IGF2BP3 axis inhibits tumor immune surveillance by upregulating N(6)-methyladenosine modification of PD-L1 mRNA in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:60.
Zou Y, Ye F, Kong Y, Hu X, Deng X, Xie J, et al. The Single-Cell Landscape of Intratumoral Heterogeneity and The Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Liver and Brain Metastases of Breast Cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;18:e2203699.
Hu G, Chong RA, Yang Q, Wei Y, Blanco MA, Li F, et al. MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:9–20.
Shen M, Smith HA, Wei Y, Jiang YZ, Zhao S, Wang N, et al. Pharmacological disruption of the MTDH-SND1 complex enhances tumor antigen presentation and synergizes with anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Nat Cancer. 2022;3:60–74.
Piskounova E, Polytarchou C, Thornton JE, LaPierre RJ, Pothoulakis C, Hagan JP, et al. Lin28A and Lin28B inhibit let-7 microRNA biogenesis by distinct mechanisms. Cell 2011;147:1066–79.
Qi M, Xia Y, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Wang X, Lu L, et al. Lin28B-high breast cancer cells promote immune suppression in the lung pre-metastatic niche via exosomes and support cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2022;13:897.
Kaur K, Wu X, Fields JK, Johnson DK, Lan L, Pratt M, et al. The fungal natural product azaphilone-9 binds to HuR and inhibits HuR-RNA interaction in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175471.
Lal P, Cerofolini L, D’Agostino VG, Zucal C, Fuccio C, Bonomo I, et al. Regulation of HuR structure and function by dihydrotanshinone-I. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9514–27.
Lang M, Berry D, Passecker K, Mesteri I, Bhuju S, Ebner F, et al. HuR Small-Molecule Inhibitor Elicits Differential Effects in Adenomatosis Polyposis and Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2424–38.
Kentsis A, Topisirovic I, Culjkovic B, Shao L, Borden KL. Ribavirin suppresses eIF4E-mediated oncogenic transformation by physical mimicry of the 7-methyl guanosine mRNA cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:18105–10.
Li S, Jia Y, Jacobson B, McCauley J, Kratzke R, Bitterman PB, et al. Treatment of breast and lung cancer cells with a N-7 benzyl guanosine monophosphate tryptamine phosphoramidate pronucleotide (4Ei-1) results in chemosensitization to gemcitabine and induced eIF4E proteasomal degradation. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:523–31.
Troschel FM, Minte A, Ismail YM, Kamal A, Abdullah MS, Ahmed SH, et al. Knockdown of Musashi RNA Binding Proteins Decreases Radioresistance but Enhances Cell Motility and Invasion in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2169.
Lan L, Appelman C, Smith AR, Yu J, Larsen S, Marquez RT, et al. Natural product (-)-gossypol inhibits colon cancer cell growth by targeting RNA-binding protein Musashi-1. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:1406–20.
Clingman CC, Deveau LM, Hay SA, Genga RM, Shandilya SM, Massi F, et al. Allosteric inhibition of a stem cell RNA-binding protein by an intermediary metabolite. Elife 2014;3:e02848.
Dong K, Wang R, Wang X, Lin F, Shen JJ, Gao P, et al. Tumor-specific RNAi targeting eIF4E suppresses tumor growth, induces apoptosis and enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in human breast carcinoma cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113:443–56.
Gujrati M, Vaidya AM, Mack M, Snyder D, Malamas A, Lu ZR. Targeted Dual pH-Sensitive Lipid ECO/siRNA Self-Assembly Nanoparticles Facilitate In Vivo Cytosolic sieIF4E Delivery and Overcome Paclitaxel Resistance in Breast Cancer Therapy. Adv Health Mater 2016;5:2882–95.
Mehta M, Basalingappa K, Griffith JN, Andrade D, Babu A, Amreddy N, et al. HuR silencing elicits oxidative stress and DNA damage and sensitizes human triple-negative breast cancer cells to radiotherapy. Oncotarget 2016;7:64820–35.
Wu X, Gardashova G, Lan L, Han S, Zhong C, Marquez RT, et al. Targeting the interaction between RNA-binding protein HuR and FOXQ1 suppresses breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Commun Biol. 2020;3:193.
Marqus S, Pirogova E, Piva TJ. Evaluation of the use of therapeutic peptides for cancer treatment. J Biomed Sci. 2017;24:21.
Lucchesi CA, Zhang J, Ma B, Chen M, Chen X. Disruption of the Rbm38-eIF4E Complex with a Synthetic Peptide Pep8 Increases p53 Expression. Cancer Res. 2019;79:807–18.
Harrigan JA, Jacq X, Martin NM, Jackson SP. Deubiquitylating enzymes and drug discovery: emerging opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Disco. 2018;17:57–78.
Burslem GM, Crews CM. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras as Therapeutics and Tools for Biological Discovery. Cell 2020;181:102–14.
Ghidini A, Clery A, Halloy F, Allain FHT, Hall J. RNA-PROTACs: Degraders of RNA-Binding Proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60:3163–9.
Roberts TC, Langer R, Wood MJA. Advances in oligonucleotide drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Disco. 2020;19:673–94.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81872139 and 82072907); Project of The Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (Y-Roche2019/2-0078\Y-pierrefabre202102-0107); Technology Development Program of Guangdong province (2021A0505030082); Project of The Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation (2020B1212060018); The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen University (2022005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CG, HY, YC, LC, and ZL contributed substantially to the conception and design of the paper. YC, LC, and ZL drafted the paper, the tables and the figures. CG, HY revised critically for the content. QL and XF participated in the literature search. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cen, Y., Chen, L., Liu, Z. et al. Novel roles of RNA-binding proteins in drug resistance of breast cancer: from molecular biology to targeting therapeutics. Cell Death Discov. 9, 52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01352-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01352-x
This article is cited by
-
ESRP1-driven alternative splicing of CLSTN1 inhibits the metastasis of gastric cancer
Cell Death Discovery (2023)