Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The role of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in the hepatocellular carcinoma transformation


Liver cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death globally. The main histological subtype is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is derived from hepatocytes. According to the epidemiologic studies, the most important risk factors of HCC are chronic viral infections (HBV, HCV, and HIV) and metabolic disease (metabolic syndrome). Interestingly, these carcinogenic factors that contributed to HCC are associated with MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction, which presented with inactivation of p53 and overactivation of MDM2 (a transcriptional target and negative regulator of p53). Mechanically, the homeostasis of MDM2–p53 feedback loop plays an important role in controlling the initiation and progression of HCC, which has been found to be dysregulated in HCC tissues. To maintain long-term survival in hepatocytes, hepatitis viruses have lots of ways to destroy the defense strategies of hepatocytes by inducing TP53 mutation and silencing, promoting MDM2 overexpression, accelerating p53 degradation, and stabilizing MDM2. As a result, genetic instability, chronic ER stress, oxidative stress, energy metabolism switch, and abnormalities in antitumor genes can be induced, all of which might promote hepatocytes’ transformation into hepatoma cells. In addition, abnormal proliferative hepatocytes and precancerous cells cannot be killed, because of hepatitis viruses-mediated exhaustion of Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and CD4+T cells by disrupting their MDM2–p53 axis. Moreover, inefficiency of hepatic immune response can be further aggravated when hepatitis viruses co-infected with HIV. Unlike with chronic viral infections, MDM2–p53 axis might play a dual role in glucolipid metabolism of hepatocytes, which presented with enhancing glucolipid catabolism, but promoting hepatocyte injury at the early and late stages of glucolipid metabolism disorder. Oxidative stress, fatty degeneration, and abnormal cell growth can be detected in hepatocytes that were suffering from glucolipid metabolism disorder, and all of which could contribute to HCC initiation. In this review, we focus on the current studies of the MDM2–p53 axis in HCC, and specifically discuss the impact of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction by viral infection and metabolic disease in the transformation of normal hepatocytes into hepatoma cells. We also discuss the therapeutic avenues and potential targets that are being developed to normalize the MDM2–p53 axis in HCC.


Liver cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death globally with 854,000 new cases and 810,000 deaths per year, and accounting for 7% of all cancers1. The main histological subtype of liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is mainly derived from hepatocytes2. According to the epidemiologic studies, the incidence of HCC is increasing progressively with advancing age in all populations and reaching a peak at 70 years; HCC has a strong male preponderance, with a male-to-female ratio estimated to be 2–2.5:13. Approximately 90% of HCCs are associated with a known underlying etiology, including chronic hepatitis virus infections (HBV and HCV), HIV infection, alcohol intake, aflatoxin exposure, metabolic diseases, and cigarette smoking4. The mechanisms of the carcinogen-mediated HCC are multipathways of which MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction had been impressive5.

Mechanically, the homeostasis of MDM2–p53 axis can be presented with the normal functions of p53 and MDM2, both of which were found abnormally expressed in HCC tissues6. Since its discovery 35 years ago, p53 has emerged as a key antitumor factor7. The p53 response can be activated by multiple stress signals, such as genotoxic stress, oncogene activation, ribosomal stress, hypoxia, and nutrient fluctuation8. After p53 activation, it would activate or repress the expression of numerous genes that relate with cancer initiation/development9. Such proapoptotic BCL‑2 family proteins [BCL‑2‑associated X protein (BAX), NOXA, and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA)] can be transcriptionally activated10; metabolic enzymes [p53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator (TIGAR) and glucose transporters] that contributed to cancer metabolic switch can be inhibited11. Indeed, accumulating evidence suggests that p53 is critical to suppress cancer development12. As previously noted, p53 plays multiple roles in cell-cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis, all of which might account for the protection of the genome from accumulating and passing these mutations to the daughter cells13. Hence, p53 has been considered as the “guardian of the genome”14. The level of cellular p53 protein is subjected to a wide range of post-translational modifications by which its subcellular localization, stability, and conformation can be regulated15,16. Under conditions of cellular homeostasis, the stability and function of p53 protein are controlled by MDM2 that targets p53 for degradation and directly inhibits p53 activity by binding to the transcriptional activation domain17. As an important ubiquitin ligase (E3 ligases), MDM2 combined with its binding partner MDMX to keep p53 activity after p53 transcriptional activities, as well as set up an efficient feedback loop to limit the p53 response18. As discussed above, the main risk factors of HCC are chronic viral infections (HBV, HCV, and HIV) and metabolic disease, all of which likely induce HCC initiation by interfering with MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction19. Hence, in this review, we focused on the dysfunction of MDM2 and p53 in HCC, and try to propose the possible mechanisms that carcinogens mediated the transformation of normal hepatocytes into hepatoma cells.

The physiological functions of p53 and MDM2 in normal hepatocytes

Although best known for its activity as a tumor suppressor, p53 is also involved in hepatocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolism20,21. After partial hepatectomy, the upregulation of p53 expression can regulate CDK2- and CDK4 activities that contribute to DNA synthesis of hepatocytes, which ultimately promotes liver regeneration22. Moreover, if p53−/−mice suffer from acute liver failure, the liver injury of mice will be prolonged, and the initiation of liver regeneration will be delayed than that in wild type23. However, p53 was found to be accounted for toxicant-induced hepatitis, such as alcohol ingestion, lipid droplet, bile acids, and heavy metal cadmium24. Hence, to avoid the overactive hepatocyte apoptosis by intrahepatic inflammation, MDM2 precisely regulated p53 functions that play the protective roles in liver detoxication responses25. Because it has an autoregulatory negative feedback loop between p53 and MDM2, toxicant-induced p53 overactivation might enhance MDM2 expression, and thereby promote Akt phosphorylation and inhibit Pim phosphorylation in hepatocytes, which contributed hepatocytes to survival in toxicant-induced hepatic inflammation26. Mice would cause severe damage of liver parenchyma after MDM2 deletion27. Indeed, hepatocyte apoptosis and hepatic inflammation in p53-dependent manner can be abrogated by some hepatic protectants because they can increase MDM2 expression28. Hence, the above results seem to indicate that normal MDM2–p53 aixs is required for cell proliferation and renewal of normal hepatocytes. Likewise, the homeostasis of MDM2–p53 axis is essential for hepatocyte metabolism29. To guarantee the energy production of hepatocytes from OXPHOS, p53 exerts its pleiotropic role in limiting glycolysis and diverting pyruvate toward the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA)30. p53 can regulate the function of multiple molecules that are required for glycolysis by suppressing the glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1) and GLUT4 transcription31, regulating the TIGAR expression, and inhibiting the several glycolytic enzymes’ expression via activation of microRNA‑34a32. In addition, the mitochondrial protein glutaminase 2 (GLS2) is the target of p53, which supported mitochondrial respiration and ATP production33. Although MDM2 always presents the opposite roles for p53, it might play the same role in glycol metabolism. MDM2KO mice exhibited a marked impairment in glucose tolerance on glucose challenge34. The glucose deprivation, MDM2, can be upregulated by mTOR via p53-dependent manner, which could promote cellular response to these environmental alterations35. However, it is worth noting that the p53 hyperactivation can induce hepatocyte apoptosis classically through the mitochondrial pathway; in the cytoplasts, p53 can lead to a marked disruption of the mitochondrial structure by promoting the Bax/Bak oligomerization, antagonizing Bcl-XL/Bcl-2 antiapoptotic effects, and forming a complex with cyclophilin D36. However, as described above, the activity of p53 is tightly controlled by its negative regulator (MDM2); induction of MDM2 expression by p53 will result in returning p53 to a basal level37. Hence, the normal liver is relatively resistant to p53-mediated cell death, and the link between mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and p53 activation following DNA damage is rarely observed38. Taken together, the homeostasis of MDM2–p53 axis can promote hepatocyte proliferation, xenobiotic detoxification, and OXPHOS-mediated energy metabolism. In addition, MDM2–p53 axis is critical for sensing nutrient deprivation and maintaining liver lipid homeostasis39. Hence, perturbations in their balance not only contribute to metabolic disorders but also to cancer development.

Chronic viral infections promote hepatoma cells’ transformation by inducing MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction

To promote themselves long-term survival in the host, viruses have lots of ways to interfere with the defense mechanisms of hepatocytes and immunity system, such as upregulating virus-receptor expression, changing hepatocytes’ metabolic pathways, and inducing hepatic T-cell exhaustion40. Among them, viruses-mediated MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction not only involved in their replication, but also induced malignant transformation of hepatocytes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Chronic viral infections mediated abnormal proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocytes by interfering with MDM2–p53 axis.

After HBV enters into the cytoplasm via NTCP, the cccDNA of HBV can integrate into host chromosomes, which provoked DNA damage of the host and p53 activation. Normally, two types of pathways can be activated, both of which are related with cell survival inhibitor: p53–Bax–mitochondria-induced apoptosis, and p53/fas-mediated cell death. However, HBx can directly bind to p53 that inhibit the infected hepatocyte apoptosis from p53–Bax–mitochondria. Moreover, HBx can disturb the transcriptional activity of p53 by binding with MDM2, which might impair p53-mediated DNA repairing. In addition, HBx binding to MDM2 can upregulate the expression of COX2 that can promote TGF-β1 expression from HSC, and thereby block hepatocyte apoptosis. Likewise, HBeAg can inhibit the p53/Fas pathway-mediated cell death. In addition, HBV can induce a small nucleolar RNA expression (SNORA18L5) in hepatocytes, which can mediate p53 ubiquitination and degradation by preventing RPL5 and RPL11 escape into the nucleoplasm to bind MDM2. Unlike HBV, the replication of HCV is mainly processed around the ER, which can induce chronic ER stress, oxidative stress, and Nrf2 activation. Nrf2 can induce MDM2-mediated Rb and p53 proteosomal degradation that might block the Rb/E2F pathway-mediated inhibitor of cell-cycle progression of infected hepatocytes. Moreover, ER stress can further promote the cell cycle by increasing MDM2 expression. Likewise, HCV can directly inhibit the expression of KLF6 that can contribute to cell-cycle arrest by promoting p53-induced MDM2 degradation. In addition, HCV can overcome the ROS/p53-mediated apoptosis by promoting MDM2 accumulation and inducing ub-mediated proteasomal degradation of p53. Interestingly, HCV can induce naive CD4+T-cell exhaustion via p53-dependent manner, which can avoid infected hepatocytes to be killed by T cells.

HBV-induced hepatoma cell transformation

In the highest-incidence HCC areas, HBV infection is involved in more than 80% of the total HCC41. HBV is a small enveloped DNA virus that covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) carries the full genetic information that is required for its replication; cccDNA can integrate into host chromosomes, which was associated with establishment of persistent HBV infection and HCC initiation42. Accumulating evidence suggests that there are lots of mechanisms that involved in the transformation of normal hepatocytes into hepatoma cells during long-term HBV infection. Such host cancer genes (TERT, MLL4, CCNE1, SENP5, and ROCK1), all of which had been found to be upregulated in HCC tissues, can be integrated with cccDNA and thereby induced a classic retrovirus-like insertional mutagenesis that contributed to chromosomal instability of hepatocytes43. In addition, multiple viral proteins (HBx, HBc, HBe, and preS) can interfere with hepatocyte functions, activate oncogenic pathways, and sensitize hepatocytes to mutagens44.

Mechanically, p53 can directly suppress HBV replication by binding and repressing the HBV enhancer45. Recently, Ying Yan et al.42 proposed a new mechanism that p53 controls HBV infection; they found that p53 can inhibit the entry of HBV into hepatocytes by binding to sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) promoter region (which is the key receptor to recognize HBV hepatocytes) and thereby inhibiting NTCP synthesis. However, numerous studies have shown that a high frequency of p53 inactivation and upregulation of NTCP expression was seen in chronic HBV infection, both of which are correlated with shorter survival times of patients with HBV-related HCC46. Hence, it seems that there are two possible mechanisms that HBV promotes hepatocarcinogenesis without cirrhosis with exhaustion of p53 function (p53 gene mutant/p53 protein inactivation). First, the hepatocytes infected with HBV cannot be killed via p53-dependent pathway, which might contribute to disruption of proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocytes, and favor the accumulation of genetic alterations and even pass those mutations to the daughter cells47. Second, the upregulation of NTCP expression would provide more channels by which HBV can easily enter into the nascent proliferating hepatocytes, which might prolong the natural history of HBV infection and contribute to the persistent low-/moderate-grade inflammation in the liver48. As Sia D et al. proposed49, genetic instability (alterations/mutations) combined with chronic inflammation has greater ability to induce HCC initiation. In general, chronic inflammation-induced liver regeneration could induce proliferation of hepatocytes that were marked by telomerase expression, and were found to be sparsely distributed across different layers of hepatocytes within the lobule50. However, one subset of those hepatocytes, which is marked by leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR-5), was found to be involved in the HCC development51. Indeed, LGR-5 expression was found to be upregulated in HBV-related HCC tissues, and patients with higher expression of LGR-5 might have a poor outcome52. A very recent study seems to find out a link between LGR-5 and HCC initiation: LGR-5 can induce p53 degradation and disrupt its stabilization by interfering with programmed cell death protein 5 (PDCD5) nuclear translocation, which could contribute to the long life of abnormal proliferative hepatocytes53. Hence, it seems that LGR-5 telomerase-positive hepatocytes are the main source of inflammatory-induced liver regeneration after HBV long-term infection, and also contribute to abnormal proliferative hepatocytes because HBV–LGR-5 mediated p53 dysfunction. Of note, these mechanisms might directly induce HCC development without cirrhosis. In addition, Pengbo Cao et al.54 also found a possible mechanism of HBV-related HCC development without cirrhosis because of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunctions; the expression of small nucleolar RNAH/ACA box 18-like 5 (SNORA18L5) in hepatocytes can be upregulated by HBV, which promotes p53 ubiquitination and degradation by preventing RPL5 and RPL11 (ribosomal proteins) to escape into the nucleoplasm to bind MDM2.

In this context, it seems clearer that multiple HBV proteins can exert their oncogenic roles by interfering with MDM2–p53 axis homeostasis in hepatocytes. HBV X protein (HBx), the X region that encodes polypeptides of 154 amino acids, can not only promote HBV survival in hepatocytes, but also interfere with the normal rhythms of hepatocytes by disturbing the MDM2–p53 axis. Wang XW55 proposed that HBx protein can modify p53 conformation by developing HBx–p53 complex, and thereby inhibiting p53 to bind to its DNA consensus sequence, which was similar to p53 missense mutants in human cancers; hence, they considered that it might be a possible mechanism that hepatocytes would differentiate into hepatoma cells, because the p53-dependent damaged DNA repairing pathway was blocked, and the functions of key tumor-suppressor genes of hepatocytes were abolished56. A similar study from Ranxu Zhu et al.57 found that HBx proteins can induce GAS2 transcriptionally silenced in human hepatocytes, which can inhibit p53-dependent apoptosis and senescence to offset HBx protein-mediated oncogenesis. In addition, p53-mediated activation of microRNA-148a was found to be suppressed by HBx protein, which could promote HCC growth and metastasis because microRNA-148a is a regulator of the HPIP/mTOR pathway activation that is required for virus-related tumor growth and metastasis58. Hence, the above evidence seems to suggest that HBx has a stronger ability to impair p53 functions, and is a key protein in HBV-related HCC development and initiation. Indeed, HBx protein-mediated p53 inactivation was found to exist in HBV-related HCC tissues, and is positively correlated with unfavorable outcomes of patients59,60. Moreover, it was reported that HBx protein-mediated p53 inactivation was found throughout the whole process of the natural history of HBV infection, which can be detected in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), cirrhosis, and HCC, and might contribute to disease development. As Alfred S. L. Cheng et al.61 proposed, the overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) because of p53 inactivation is a media that accounted for disease development. COX2 can increase hepatic inflammation and promote collagen and TGF-β1 expression of hepatic stellate cells62, and also can prevent abnormal differentiation of HBV-infected hepatocyte apoptosis by COX2/Wnt/β‑catenin pathway63. In addition, HBx protein had been reported to aggravate liver inflammation of chronic hepatitis B by increasing MDM2 and decreasing p5364. Interestingly, HBV-infected hepatocytes can escape from immune-mediated injury but not from uninfected hepatocytes, because HBx protein can block tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Fas-mediated apoptosis by activating NF-κB pathway65. Hence, HBx protein-mediated p53 inactivation might induce persistant liver inflammation that is not for HBV elimination. Certainly, p53 can mediate HBx protein inactivation through MDM2-dependent ubiquitin degradation and even seven in absentia homolog 1 (Siah-1) protein-dependent proteasomal degradation66,67. However, HBx protein has its defense mechanism by directly binding to MDM2 and promoting MDM2 translocation into the nucleus to antagonize p53 transcriptional activity68. In return, the stability of HBx protein can be strengthened by MDM2-mediated NEDDylation69. However, it is unfortunate that the combination of HBx protein and MDM2 might accelerate HBV-related fibrosis development. HBx protein can directly upregulate TGF-β1 expression via stabilization of the SMAD4 complex and activation of RAS–ERK and PI3K–AKT pathway70. Likewise, MDM2 can contribute to TGF-β1-induced fibroblast activation by attenuating Notch1 signaling71.

It is worth noting that HBx protein is not the unique protein of HBV, which can promote hepatoma cells’ transformation. Accumulating evidence suggests that HBeAg not only contributed to establishment of viral long-term infection, but also involved in HCC development. Indeed, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with precore G1896A mutant, in which HBeAg production was blocked, have low risk of hepatocarcinogenesis72. Unlike the HBx protein, HBeAg is a nonstructural protein of HBV. The majority of HBeAg is secreted, although less than 30% of the mature HBeAg is retained in the cytoplasm73. The purposes of this precise strategy (secreting and retaining) are mainly contributing to HBV survival in hepatocytes. Secreted HBeAg can protect the injury of infected hepatocytes’ immune-system responses72, and the retained HBeAg can help infected hepatocytes escape from apoptosis by antagonizing the cytotoxicity from p53-dependent Fas/FasL and TRAIL74. Moreover, the carcinogenic effects of intracellular HBeAg were also found to be the consequence of compromised p53 activity. In the cytoplasm of infected hepatocytes, HBeAg can promote MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation, and impair the transcriptional activity of p53 by interacting with NUMB (a positive regulator of p53)75. Hence, HBV-infected hepatocytes cannot be killed because of retained HBeAg-mediated MDM2–p53 axis dysfunctions and secreted HBeAg-mediated immune-system exhaustion.

HCV-induced hepatoma cells’ transformation

The full genetic information of HCV is localized in its positive-stranded RNA; unlike the HBV, the HCV genome does not need to enter the nucleus and integrate into the chromosome of infected hepatocytes76. Hence, HCV–RNA can be directly translated in the hepatocyte cytoplasm after endocytosis and uncoating, which are mediated by pH-dependent fusion with the lysosome77. Mechanistically, the HCV replication is mainly localized around the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Mature HCV gene products (proteins) are mainly synthesized in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, which can be distinguished into the structural and nonstructural proteins according to the spherical structure components of the virus78. The structural proteins were named capsid protein C, envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, and protein P7; the nonstructural proteins were named NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B79.

In recent years, multiple studies have proposed that HCV proteins are related with hepatocarcinogenesis, and those results were mainly from HCC tissues that have higher levels of HCV-related proteins than those in adjacent tissues80. Indeed, HCV has a strong ability to induce genomic instability and aneuploidy of hepatocytes, because the ways of its replication had affected the homeostasis of MDM2–p53 axis. As mentioned above, the transcription and new virus particle formation of HCV are processed around the ER, which could induce chronic ER and oxidative stress and NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activation81. After activation, Nrf2, a nuclear factor, can induce MDM2-mediated Rb proteosomal degradation by promoting MDM2 expression, which might block the Rb/E2F pathway that mediated the inhibitor of cell-cycle progression of infected hepatocytes82. Hence, this procession could promote HCV long-term survival in infected hepatocytes with chronic ER and oxidative stress. Moreover, oxidative stress can further impair p53 activity by suppressing its acetylation and increasing MDM2-mediated ubiquitin degradation. Certainly, the liver has its defense mechanisms against persistent HCV infection. Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) can be activated by HCV-related proteins78,79,80,81,82,83. These cells can provoke the release of ROS of infected hepatocytes by producing pro-inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and profibrotic cytokines (TGF-β), which contribute to apoptotic cell death of infected hepatocytes via p53-dependent manner84. It is well recognized that the mechanisms of ROS induce apoptotic cell death via the upregulation of p53 function by increasing ubiquitin-dependent MDM2 degradation and thereby reducing p53 degradation85. However, HCV can overcome the ROS/p53-mediated apoptosis of infected hepatocytes by promoting promoter hypermethylation of p14, which can promote MDM2 accumulation, and inducing ub-mediated proteasomal degradation of p5386. In addition, in the absence of p53, HSCs might stimulate the polarization of Kupffer cells into a tumor-promoting state and enhance the proliferation of premalignant cells87. But more than that, HCV-induced p53 dysfunction has also been found in T cells that naive CD4+T-cell exhaustion can be induced by HCV via p53-dependent manner, which avoided infected hepatocytes to be killed by T cells. As Lam Nhat Nguyen et al.88 found, senescence and apoptosis are the main reasons of naive CD4+T-cell exhaustion because the stability and function of telomeric repeat-binding factor 2 (TRF2) was impaired by HCV-mediated upregulation of p53 expression; TRF2 is a key factor that can maintain telomere integrity and oppose replicate DNA damage, and TRF2 dysfunction would provoke cell senescence89. Hence, the above-mentioned evidence seems proposed that the normal proliferation and apoptosis of infected hepatocytes can be disrupted via HCV-induced apoptosis-related protein inactivation by interfering with MDM2–p53 axis; moreover, the abnormal differentiation hepatocytes cannot be killed because of T-cell exhaustion by HCV-mediated p53 dysfunction.

Apart from the above-mentioned mechanisms, the dysfunctions of anti- and pro-tumor proteins have been found to involve in HCV-induced HCC because of MDM2–p53 axis disruption. As Mirko Tarocchi et al.90 proposed, low expression of Krüppel-like C2H2 zinc finger (KLF) 6 may be a factor for hepatocarcinogenesis during chronic HCV infection, which was inhibited after persistant HCV replication. In general, KLF6 is classified into antitumor protein because it can suppress MDM2 transcription and promote p53 activation by interacting with P2 promoter of MDM291. Hence, KLF6 dysfunction might be required for the abnormal proliferation of hepatocytes and contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis. Indeed, KLF6 dysfunction was associated with HCV-related HCC prognosis, and KLF6 was found to be abnormally decreased in HCC samples with a history of CHC92. Conversely, FUSE-binding protein 1 (FBP1) and protein kinase R (PKR) were found to be abnormally increased in HCC samples, both of which are associated with HCV replication and poor prognosis93. HCV can enhance FBP1 function and activate PKR, and thereby influence p53 expression and its DNA-binding activity. Hence, the function of p53 might gradually decrease along with HCV-related disease progression, which may be accounted for hepatoma cells’ transformation. However, p53 inactivation could disturb the glycometabolism of hepatocytes because of insulin resistance (IR), which can be provoked via HCV core protein by inhibiting PTEN/p53 pathway94. As a result, the energy supply of hepatocytes would switch from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to Warburg glycolysis, which is the main metabolic way of hepatoma cells. Moreover, IR can induce steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis by promoting infected hepatocytes to produce inflammatory cytokines95.

HIV-induced hepatoma cells’ transformation

Similarly to HCV, the full genetic information of HIV is localized in its single-stranded RNA96. Unlike with hepatitis viruses, HIV cannot survive in hepatocytes. However, patients with HIV infection are more prone to suffer from HCC than the general population97, and the HCC patients with HIV/hepatitis virus co-infection have higher HCC-staging score and a poor prognosis98.

Although multiple studies have confirmed that higher HIV RNA and long-term detectable HIV were independently associated with higher risk of HCC, especially in HIV patients with HBV/HCV infection99, yet the mechanism by which HIV induces HCC initiation has not been defined. Because the HIV is mainly infected with CD4+T cells and induced their depletion, researchers are focusing on the relationship between CD4+T-cell death and HCC initiation. Woo Park et al.100 proposed that the Nef (a protein of HIV) can be transferred to hepatocytes through conduits from infected CD4+T cells, and consequently contributed to dramatically augment ROS production and enhance ethanol- mediated HCV replication so as to accelerate HCC. In general, intrahepatic CD4+T cells have a strong power to control hepatocarcinogenesis by removing the senescent hepatocytes, and the loss of intrahepatic CD4+T cells can lead to abnormal hepatocyte growth101,102. However, to promote its survival in CD4+T cells, HIV has lots of ways against its normal defense mechanisms. Undoubtedly, HIV-mediated MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction was shown to be involved in CD4+T-cell exhaustion103. During acute HIV infection, the numbers of CD4+T cells are rapidly diminishing because of viral invasion and integration; after viral invasion and integration, DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) can be activated and thereby causes phosphorylation of p53 and histone H2AX, both of which contributed to CD4+T-cell death104. However, the p53 pathway activation can exert a negative role in HIV replication105. Hence, HIV can degrade p53 and stabilize the post-translational level of MDM2 by inducing AKT-mediated MDM2 phosphorylation so as to maintain long-term survival time in CD4+T cells106. Apart from the CD4+T cells, Kupffer cells can also be infected by HIV. As a defense mechanism, macrophages can inhibit HIV replication in its cytoplasm by activating p53/p21/CDK1 pathway-mediated cell-cycle arrest107. However, HIV can negatively regulate the level of p53 by promoting the expression level of MDM2, which creates a cellular environment more favorable to the early steps of HIV-1 replication108. In addition, type I alpha-/beta-interferon (IFN-α/β) production of liver macrophages can be inhibited because HIV mediated p53/p21/IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) pathway inactivation109. Hence, Kupffer cells might present a low-affinity phenotype for eliminating the abnormal proliferation of hepatocytes. Taken together, although it does not have direct mechanisms that can explain HIV-induced HCC initiation and progression as the main hepatic supervisors of hepatocyte destructive–regenerative process, CD4+T-cell and Kupffer cell exhaustion might contribute to abnormal hepatocyte proliferation, especially in hepatocytes with hepatitis virus infections.

MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction involved in metabolic syndrome-related HCC initiation

Caloric excess and sedentary lifestyle have led to metabolic syndrome110. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are strongly associated with metabolic syndrome, both of which are the independent risk factors for HCC development111. Similar to hepatitis virus infections, HCC can primarily arise in NAFLD patients without underlying cirrhosis, but the incidences of HCC are much higher112. Mechanistically, NAFLD and T2DM are mainly caused from fat accumulation and insulin resistance (IR), which are characterized by glucolipid metabolism disorder113. Considering that hepatocytes are accounted for glucolipid metabolism, the normal hepatocyte program could be disturbed by glucose and lipid metabolism disorder (Fig. 2). As discussed above, MDM2–p53 axis has involved in glucolipid metabolism, and its dysregulation might promote the metabolic disease-related liver disease development. Indeed, the functions of p53 protein were found to be abnormally changed in patients with NAFLD114. Mice with TP53 mutation can develop the spontaneous liver inflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis, also found in HCC patients with a history of NAFLD115,116. However, it seems that there is an absence of direct evidence that MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction promotes NAFLD to HCC. Recently, Heng Wu et al.117 proposed that microRNA-21 might be a potential link between NAFLD and HCC; they considered that microRNA-21 overexpression, which was mediated by lipid accumulation of hepatocytes, can enhance carcinogenesis-related protein expression (CCNB1, CCND1, and SREBP1C) by inhibiting p53 expression, because the target of microRNA-21 (HBP1) is also a transcriptional activator of p53. Moreover, the microRNA-21 overexpression can enhance G1/S and G2/S transition of hepatocytes with de novo lipogenesis by modulating Hbp1–p53 axis, and mircoRNA-21 knockdown prevents G1/S transition and cancer cell proliferation. In NASH-driven HCC models, tumors mainly arise from differentiated pericentral hepatocytes118, which exhibit higher levels of de novo lipogenesis than periportal hepatocytes119. Mechanically, early in tumor development, differentiated hepatocytes are converted into HCC progenitor cells (HcPC), in which its transcriptomic signature is similar to bipotential hepatobiliary cells that reside periportally120. However, there is lack of the mechanisms by which differentiated hepatocytes converted into HcPC. We discussed previously that inhibition of p53 accumulation and activity is a key early step in HCC initiation, which takes place long before p53-inactivating mutations are acquired121. Debanjan Dhar et al.122 proposed that the link of HCC initiation (differentiated hepatocytes converted into HcPC) and MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction is provided by CD44, which is a hyaluronic acid receptor whose expression is rapidly induced in carcinogen-exposed hepatocytes in a STAT3-dependent manner. Hepatic CD44 was strongly upregulated in NASH and HCC patients, and was expressed in HcPC but not in normal hepatocytes123. Once expressed, CD44 potentiates AKT activation to induce the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of MDM2, which terminates the p53 genomic surveillance response124. Hence, CD44 will prevent the premature cell-cycle exit and death of pericentral hepatocytes that had acquired a potential oncogenic mutation in at least one DNA strand, and allows them to proliferate, duplicate the mutation, and transmit it into one of their progeny121. As a result, hepatocytes with de novo lipogenesis are prone to convert into HcPC, and the liver contains HcPC that undergoes multiple divisions to give rise to fully malignant HCC after long-term lipometabolic disturbance challenge125. In addition to serving as a HCC marker, CD44 may be involved in NASH development by inducing inflammation123. However, lipometabolic disturbance-induced liver inflammation could alter glucose metabolism of hepatocytes. Along with NASH progression, the expression of PGC1a can be gradually inhibited because of hepatic inflammation126. Under normal conditions, PGC1a can bind to p53 and enhances the p53-mediated cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein 2 (SCO2), which increases glucose utilization by increasing mitochondrial biogenesis and OXPHOS127. Downregulated PGC1α expression in hepatocytes could alter glucose metabolism, which might be related to hepatic dedifferentiation in HCC. Indeed, in human HCC lines, mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in p53/PGC1a-dependent way were downregulated because CD147 facilitated the cell surface expression of MCT1 and lactate export, which led to the activation of PI3K/AKT/MDM2 pathway and thus increased p53 degradation128,129. Interestingly, AKT–MDM2 pathway has another way to induce p53 inactivation: cytoplasmic sequestration, which was to be found in tissues from HCC patients with ASH and NASH. During the ongoing disease process, p53 inactivation by cytoplasmic sequestration was induced by LKB1 (serine/threonine protein kinase 11) that was related with HCC initiation130.

Fig. 2: Glucose and lipid metabolism disorder disturbed normal hepatocyte program by inducing MDM2–p53 axis.

After glucose and lipid metabolism disorder, the expression of CD44 is induced in hepatocytes with lipid deposition. Once expressed, CD44 potentiates AKT activation to induce the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of MDM2, which terminates the p53 genomic surveillance response by repairing DNA or mediating cell apoptosis. Moreover, CD44 can directly prevent the premature cell-cycle exit and death of pericentral hepatocytes. Furthermore, lipid deposition can provoke DNA damage by lipotoxicity, which could contribute to the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IL-1β) and CD147. CD147 could disturb mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in p53/PGC1a-dependent manner by promoting MDM2 expression. Pro-inflammatory cytokines can induce IR that aggravates glycometabolic disorder, and IL-6 can inhibit p53-mediated apoptosis. In addition, lipid deposition can increase the expression of microRNA-21, which can interfere with p53 binding to its DNA consensus sequence and enhance the cell cycle.

However, it is worth noting that MDM2–p53 axis maybe a double-edged sword in the progression of NAFLD131. In the early stages of NAFLD (liver steatosis), gradually increasing p53 response is a negative regulator of hepatic lipid accumulation132. But higher expression of p53 may induce liver inflammation, which would contribute to the progression of liver steatosis to more advanced stages (HCC) of NAFLD133. It was further confirmed that the expression of p53 in patients with liver steatosis without inflammation was significantly lower than that in NASH. However, the mechanism of MDM2–p53 axis that plays a negative role in progression of NAFLD is still unclear. In a recent study, Rui E. Castro et al.134 proposed that microRNA-34a overexpression is one of the reasons for liver steatosis without inflammation toward steatohepatitis or HCC; microRNA-34a overexpression will increase p53 acetylation and transcription, which leads to the diminishment of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) in the NAFLD liver. However, as a NAD-dependent deacetylase that modulates apoptosis of hepatocytes in response to oxidative and genotoxic stress, SIRT1 inactivation could provoke insulin resistance and pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) expression and pro-inflammatory signaling pathway (STAT3 and JNK) activation135, all of which are important factors governing hepatoma cells’ transformation. It is well-known that pro-inflammatory cytokines that induced chronic inflammatory response have to be considered as two potent activators of pro-oncogenic signaling that were linked to HCC onset136, such as IL-6 prevents DNA-damage-induced hepatocyte apoptosis through suppression of p53 and enhances β-catenin activation137. Hence, it seems reasonable that UDCA was found to be associated with suppressor of HCC, because UDCA can ameliorate insulin sensitivity and liver inflammation by stabilizing the p53/MDM2 interaction and enhancing MDM2-dependent ubiquitination of p53138.

Therapeutic avenues that target MDM2–p53 axis in HCC

As discussed above, the dysfunction of MDM2–p53 axis plays a critical role in HCC tumor development and progression. Hence, normalization of MDM2–p53 axis has been considered as an exciting target for antitumor drug design. The main points of therapies are focusing on restoring p53 function, decreasing MDM2 function, and normalizing MDM2–p53 protein–protein interaction139. In addition, considering that the p53 mutation also accounted for HCC development, some therapeutic avenues can also exert the role of antitumor by antagonizing MDM2 independent of p53.

Anti-HCC by restoring p53 function and normalizing MDM2–p53 interaction

Until now, there are some strategies that have been considered in p53 reactivation140, including disrupting the MDM2–p53 interaction, releasing p53 by small molecules, restoring wild-type function to mutant p53 by covalent modification of its core domain, and reconstructing a functional copy of p53 by viral or nonviral DNA transfection. In clinical application, recombinant adenovirus—p53 is a relatively safe and effective method for treating HCC141, and sequential therapy of p53 gene transcatheter arterial infusion was safe and could prolong the survival time of the patients142. However, it should be noted that it is lack of MDM2–p53 axis-targeted drugs that can be used in patients with HCC. As the standard first-line systemic therapy for HCC, the antineoplastic functions of sorafenib are partly associated with upregulation of p53143. In recent studies, some antineoplastic agents that can activate p53 pathway have been found in vitro. Cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis of HCC1419 (mutp53–Y220C) can be provoked by SLMP53-2, which is a new molecule to activate mutation of p53 by enhancing its interaction with the heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and leading to the reestablishment of p53 DNA-binding ability as well as wild-type p53144,145. In another p53-null HCC line, the cell growth of Hep3B cells can be inhibited by melatonin (a hormone for regulation of circadian rhythms), which can promote the expression of several proapoptotic target genes (p21 and BAX) of p53146. Likewise, it might exert antineoplastic effects by improving the wide-type p53 function in HCC. HepG2 cells can be killed by indolizine derivatives, which promoted p53 activation and increased its accumulation in nuclei147. As a new wild-type p53 activator, adiponectin can significantly attenuate HCC progression of rats by targeting p53/TRAIL/caspase-8 signaling148. However, it is worth noting that WTp53 activation might have a counterintuitive effect to enhance tumorigenesis by promoting cancer metabolic switch via p53/PUMA-dependent oxidative phosphorylation suppression149. Moreover, elevated p53 could lead to decrease the tumor-protective function of the estrogen alpha (ERα) pathway in female hepatocarcinogenesis150, although ERα pathway was found to be involved in the development of chronic liver diseases151. Hence, some antineoplastic drugs/targets have been constructed/considered to antagonize MDM2, independent of p53. MDM2 and nuclear factor of activated T-cell 1 (NFAT1) dual inhibitor induces MDM2 autoubiquitination and degradation, and represses NFAT1-mediated MDM2 transcription, which can inhibit the growth and metastasis of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo152. SP141 and MA242 (MDM2 inhibitors) are the potential drugs for treating HCC, because their effectiveness had been confirmed in breast cancer models and pancreatic tumor mice153,154.

However, considering the side effects and resistance of antineoplastic drugs of HCC treatment, some new extracts from common plants can directly antagonize HCC growth, improve the anticancer activity, and reduce hepatotoxicity by enhancing p53 function and disrupting MDM2–p53 interaction. Oleanolic acid can help cisplatin to overcome the chemotherapeutic resistance by activating p53/Bax/cytochrome C/caspase-3 proapoptotic signaling pathway155. Acetylshikonin can directly promote HepG2 cell apoptosis by activating p53/PUMA/Bax pathway156. Troxerutin can subdue hepatic tumorigenesis via disrupting the MDM2–p53 interaction by decreasing the expression of MDM2 and increasing that of wild-type p53157.

Potential therapeutic targets of anti-HCC

There are lots of potential targets that were related with MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction that can be considered to exert anti-HCC properties, all of which have been found to be abnormally changed in tissues of HCC patients, and are correlated with favorable/unfavorable HCC outcomes (Table 1). Among those favorable prognosis-related molecules, the anti-HCC activity of RAD52 motif 1 (RDM1), adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and growth arrest-specific protein 2 (GAS2), and microRNA-34a and microRNA-621, was mainly associated with increased p53 function (transcription and activating p53 pathway). RDM1 promotes the expression of p53 downstream targets (p21, cyclinA1, and 14-3-3δ) and inhibits activation of Ras/Raf/ERK signaling pathway depending on p53158. ATGL imposes glycolytic rewiring of HCC by promoting acetylation and stabilization of p53 throughout ATGL/PPAR-α/p300 axis159. GAS2 induces SK-Hep1 apoptosis via p53-dependent apoptosis pathway. MiR-34a enhances the inhibitory effect of doxorubicin on HepG2 cells by promoting p53-mediated multidrug-resistance protein (MDR)1/P glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor31. MicroRNA-621 improves the radiosensitivity of HCC cells by directly targeting SET domain-bifurcated 1 (SETDB1) and thereby activating the p53 pathway160. In addition, RNA-binding motif protein 38 (RBM38), glycogen synthase 2 (GYS2), and sirtuin3 have been reported to exert anti-HCC roles via stabilizing the MDM2–p53 loop function by inhibiting MDM2 and restoring wtp53 expression and/or slowing p53 degradation58,161,162.

Table 1 Overview of potential therapeutic targets of anti-HCC by modifying MDM2–p53 axis.

Conversely, as unfavorable factors for HCC prognosis, the upregulated expression of molecules can directly promote hepatoma cell growth and indirectly facilitate HCC development by inducing chemotherapy resistance, all of which are mainly associated with decreased p53 activation. Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) can promote cytokinesis of HCC cells and induce HCC cell desensitization to taxol by inhibiting p53/p21 or p53/p14ARF activation163; SIRT7 can cause doxorubicin resistance by interacting and inducing deacetylation of p53, and thereby reducing affinity for the NOXA promoter and its transcription164. In addition, protein myosin light chain 6B (MYL6B) can promote HCC development by binding MDM2 and p53 proteins, accelerating the p53 degradation165.


This review summarized the current literature highlighting the negative effects of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in the context of hepatoma cells’ transformation (Table 2). Although the high number of studies had proposed some tumor cell-specific signaling pathways that modulate the MDM2–p53 axis, the mechanisms of the MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in HCC progression are complex. In addition, future studies should focus on the hallmarks of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in the chronic progressive liver disease that is strongly associated with HCC initiation and development, which will help to diagnose and treat the HCC at vulnerable early stages. At the same time, we should focus on the expression levels of some molecules that can modulate the balance of MDM2–p53 axis in chronic liver diseases, which had been found to be abnormally changed in HCC tissues. By focusing on the MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in the transformation of normal hepatocytes into hepatoma cells, we hoped to provide some clues for the liver cancer prevention and pre-HCC treatment strategies.

Table 2 The changes in antitumor and carcinogenic factors following MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction.


  1. 1.

    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 69, 182–236 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Calderaro, J. et al. Histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma are related to gene mutations and molecular tumour classification. J. Hepatol. 67, 727–738 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    De Toni, E. N. et al. Age independent survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without metastases at diagnosis: a population-based study. Gut 69, 168–176 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Johnson, P. J. Hepatocellular carcinoma: is current therapy really altering outcome? Gut 51, 459–462 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Meng, X., Franklin, D. A., Dong, J. & Zhang, Y. MDM2-p53 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 74, 7161–7167 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jablkowski, M., Bocian, A., Bialkowska, J. & Bartkowiak, J. A comparative study of P53/MDM2 genes alterations and P53/MDM2 proteins immunoreactivity in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellu lar carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 117–125 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kruiswijk, F., Labuschagne, C. F. & Vousden, K. H. p53 in survival, death and metabolic health: a lifeguard with a licence to kill. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 393–405 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Levine, A. J. Reviewing the future of the P53 field. Cell Death Differ. 25, 1–2 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sullivan, K. D. et al. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by p53. Cell Death Differ. 25, 133–143 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Delbridge, A. R. & Strasser, A. The BCL-2 protein family, BH3-mimetics and cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 22, 1071–1080 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, S. et al. KRAB-type zinc-finger proteins PITA and PISA specifically regulate p53-dependent glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. Cell Res. 28, 572–592 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Aubrey, B. J. et al. How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression? Cell Death Differ. 25, 104–113 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kaiser, A. M. & Attardi, L. D. Deconstructing networks of p53-mediated tumor suppression in vivo. Cell Death Differ. 25, 93–103 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kastenhuber, E. R. & Lowe, S. W. Putting p53 in context. Cell 170, 1062–1078 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vousden, K. H. & Prives, C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 137, 413–431 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Solomon, H. et al. Post-translational regulation of p53 function through 20S proteasome-mediated cleavage. Cell Death Differ. 24, 2187–2198 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kruse, J. P. & Gu, W. Modes of p53 regulation. Cell 137, 609–622 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A. & Oren, M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387, 296–299 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baugh, E. H., Ke, H., Levine, A. J., Bonneau, R. A. & Chan, C. S. Why are there hotspot mutations in the TP53 gene in human cancers? Cell Death Differ. 25, 154–160 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Amaral, J. D., Castro, R. E., Steer, C. J. & Rodrigues, C. M. p53 and the regulation of hepatocyte apoptosis: implications for disease pathogenesis. Trends Mol. Med. 15, 531–541 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Engeland, K. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 25, 114–132 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Diril, M. K. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3826–3831 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Borude, P. et al. Pleiotropic role of p53 in injury and liver regeneration after acetaminophen overdose. Am. J. Pathol. 188, 1406–1418 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Farrell, G. C. et al. Apoptosis in experimental NASH is associated with p53 activation and TRAIL receptor expression. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 24, 443–452 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sharma, A., Saurabh, K., Yadav, S., Jain, S. K. & Parmar, D. Expression profiling of selected genes of toxication and detoxication pathways in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a biomarker for predicting toxicity of environmental chemicals. Int J. Hyg. Environ. Health 216, 645–651 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guo, R., Zhong, L. & Ren, J. Overexpression of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 attenuates chronic alcohol exposure-induced apoptosis, change in Akt and Pim signalling in liver. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 36, 463–468 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Amaral, J. D., Castro, R. E., Sola, S., Steer, C. J. & Rodrigues, C. M. p53 is a key molecular target of ursodeoxycholic acid in regulating apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34250–34259 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lu, W. Y. et al. Hepatic progenitor cells of biliary origin with liver repopulation capacity. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 971–983 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nemajerova, A. et al. Non-oncogenic roles of TAp73: from multiciliogenesis to metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 25, 144–153 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lonetto, G. et al. Mutant p53-dependent mitochondrial metabolic alterations in a mesenchymal stem cell-based model of progressive malignancy. Cell Death Differ. 26, 1566–1581 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang, C. et al. Tumour-associated mutant p53 drives the Warburg effect. Nat. Commun. 4, 2935 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zheng, S. Z. et al. MiR-34a overexpression enhances the inhibitory effect of doxorubicin on HepG2 cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 25, 2752–2762 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hu, W. et al. Glutaminase 2, a novel p53 target gene regulating energy metabolism and antioxi- dant function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7455–7460 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, X. et al. The MDM2-p53-pyruvate carboxylase signalling axis couples mitochondrial metabolism to glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 11740 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ye, P. et al. An mTORC1-Mdm2-Drosha axis for miRNA biogenesis in response to glucose- and amino acid-deprivation. Mol. Cell. 57, 708–720 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wolff, S., Erster, S., Palacios, G. & Moll, U. M. p53’s mitochondrial translocation and MOMP action is independent of Puma and Bax and severely disrupts mitochondrial membrane integrity. Cell Res. 18, 733–744 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Berkers, C. R., Maddocks, O. D., Cheung, E. C., Mor, I. & Vousden, K. H. Metabolic regulation by p53 family members. Cell Metab. 18, 617–633 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chakraborty, P., Roy, S. S., Basu, A. & Bhattacharya, S. Sensitization of cancer cells to cyclophos phamide therapy by an organoselenium compound through ROS-mediated apoptosis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 84, 1992–1999 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wu, D. & Prives, C. Relevance of the p53-MDM2 axis to aging. Cell Death Differ. 25, 169–179 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cao, H. et al. CTLA-4 interferes with the HBV-specific T cell immune response (Review). Int J. Mol. Med. 42, 703–712 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Allaire, M. et al. Extrahepatic cancers are the leading cause of death in patients achieving hepatitis B virus control or hepatitis C virus eradication. Hepatology 68, 1245–1259 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yan, Y. et al. Down-regulation of cell membrane localized NTCP expression in proliferating hepatocytes prevents hepatitis B virus infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 8, 879–894 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sung, W. K. et al. Genome-wide survey of recurrent HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 44, 765–769 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Levrero, M. & Zucman-Rossi, J. Mechanisms of HBV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 64(1 Suppl), S84–s101 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhao, F. et al. Cellular DNA repair cofactors affecting hepatitis B virus infection and replication. World J. Gastroenterol. 14, 5059–5065 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Amaddeo, G. et al. Integration of tumour and viral genomic characterizations in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinomas. Gut 64, 820–829 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cougot, D., Neuveut, C. & Buendia, M. A. HBV induced carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Virol. 34(Suppl 1), S75–S78 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhao, X. et al. An HBV-encoded miRNA activates innate immunity to restrict HBV replication. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sia, D., Villanueva, A., Friedman, S. L. & Llovet, J. M. Liver cancer cell of origin, molecular class, and effects on patient prognosis. Gastroenterology 152, 745–761 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lin, S. et al. Distributed hepatocytes expressing telomerase repopulate the liver in homeostasis and injury. Nature 556, 244–248 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ang, C. H. et al. Lgr5(+) pericentral hepatocytes are self-maintained in normal liver regeneration and susceptible to hepatocarcinogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19530–19540 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ko, C. J., Li, C. J., Wu, M. Y. & Chu, P. Y. Overexpression of LGR-5 as a Predictor of poor outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 10 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ma, Z. et al. Lgr5-mediated p53 repression through PDCD5 leads to doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics 9, 2967–2983 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Cao, P. et al. Germline duplication of SNORA18L5 increases risk for HBV-related hepato cellular carcinoma by altering localization of ribosomal proteins and decreasing levels of p53. Gastroenterology 155, 542–556 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang, X. W. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits p53 sequence-specific DNA binding, transcriptional activity, and association with transcription factor ERCC3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2230–2234 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Li, S. G. et al. C-Myc-dependent repression of two oncogenic miRNA clusters contributes to triptolide-induced cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 51 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhu, R. et al. Truncated HBx-dependent silencing of GAS2 promotes hepatocarcinogenesis through deregulation of cell cycle, senescence and p53-mediated apoptosis. J. Pathol. 237, 38–49 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Xu, X. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein represses miRNA-148a to enhance tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Invest 123, 630–645 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Chen, S. L. et al. A GYS2/p53 negative feedback loop restricts tumor growth in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 79, 534–545 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wu, C. C., Wu, D. W., Lin, Y. Y., Lin, P. L. & Lee, H. Hepatitis B virus X protein represses LKB1 expression to promote tumor progression and poor postoperative outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 163, 1040–1046 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cheng, A. S., Yu, J., Lai, P. B., Chan, H. L. & Sung, J. J. COX-2 mediates hepatitis B virus X protein abrogation of p53-induced apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374, 175–180 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kamada, Y. et al. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V regulates TGF-beta response in hepatic stellate cells and the progression of steatohepatitis. Glycobiology 22, 778–787 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zheng, B. Y. et al. HBx promotes the proliferative ability of HL-7702 cells via the COX-2/Wnt/ beta-catenin pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 17, 8432–8438 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fu, L. et al. miR-146a-5p enhances hepatitis B virus replication through autophagy to promote aggravation of chronic hepatitis B. IUBMB Life. 71, 1336–1346 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Slagle, B. L. & Bouchard, M. J. Role of HBx in hepatitis B virus persistence and its therapeutic implications. Curr. Opin. Virol. 30, 32–38 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yeom, S., Kim, S. S., Jeong, H. & Jang, K. L. Hepatitis B virus X protein activates E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah-1 to control virus propagation via a negative feedback loop. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 1774–1784 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Xian, L. et al. p53 Promotes proteasome-dependent degradation of oncogenic protein HBx by transcription of MDM2. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37, 2935–2940 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Wang, C. et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein promotes the stem-like properties of OV6(+) cancer cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2560 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Liu, N. et al. HDM2 promotes NEDDylation of hepatitis B virus HBx to enhance its stability and function. J. Virol. 91, 16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Dattaroy, D. et al. Sparstolonin B(SsnB) attenuates liver fibrosis via a parallel conjugate pathway involving P53-P21 axis, TGF-beta signaling and focal adhesion that is TLR4 dependent. Eur. J. Pharm. 841, 33–48 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ye, C. et al. MDM2 mediates fibroblast activation and renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis via a p53-independent pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 312, F760–f768 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Mason, W. S. et al. HBV DNA Integration and clonal hepatocyte expansion in chronic hepatitis B patients considered immune tolerant. Gastroenterology 151, 986–998 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Serruys, B., Van Houtte, F., Verbrugghe, P., Leroux-Roels, G. & Vanlandschoot, P. Llama-derived single-domain intrabodies inhibit secretion of hepatitis B virions in mice. Hepatology 49, 39–49 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Liu, W., Guo, T. F., Jing, Z. T. & Tong, Q. Y. Repression of death receptor-mediated apoptosis of hepatocytes by hepatitis B virus E antigen. Am. J. Pathol. 189, 2181–2195 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Liu, D. et al. Hepatitis B e antigen and its precursors promote the progress of hepatocellular carcinoma by interacting with NUMB and decreasing p53 activity. Hepatology 64, 390–404 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ashraf, M. U. et al. Evolution of efficacious pangenotypic hepatitis C virus therapies. Med. Res. Rev. 39, 1091–1136 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Ray, R. B. & Ray, R. Hepatitis C Virus Manipulates Humans as its Favorite Host for a Long-Term Relationship. Hepatology 69, 889–900 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Dearborn, A. D. & Marcotrigiano, J. Hepatitis C Virus Structure: Defined By What It Is Not. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 10, a036822 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Tornesello, M. L., Annunziata, C., Tornesello, A. L., Buonaguro, L. & Buonaguro, F. M. Human oncoviruses and p53 tumor suppressor pathway deregulation at the origin of human cancers. Cancers (Basel) 7, E213 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lupberger, J. et al. Combined analysis of metabolomes, proteomes, and transcriptomes of hepatitis C virus-infected cells and liver to identify pathways associated with disease development. Gastroenterology 157, 537–551 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Aydin, Y. et al. Activation of PERK-Nrf2 oncogenic signaling promotes Mdm2-mediated Rb degradation in persistently infected HCV culture. Sci. Rep. 7, 9223 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Dick, F. A. & Rubin, S. M. Molecular mechanisms underlying RB protein function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 297–306 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Qu, C. et al. Tyrosine kinase SYK is a potential therapeutic target for liver fibrosis. Hepatology 68, 1125–1139 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kim, G. J. et al. Hederagenin supplementation alleviates the pro-inflammatory and apoptotic response to alcohol in rats. Nutrients 10, E41 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Tseng, C. Y., Wang, J. S. & Chao, M. W. Causation by diesel exhaust particles of endothelial dysfunctions in cytotoxicity, pro-inflammation, permeability, and apoptosis induced by ROS generation. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 17, 384–392 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Seo, Y. L., Heo, S. & Jang, K. L. Hepatitis C virus core protein overcomes H2O2-induced apoptosis by downregulating p14 expression via DNA methylation. J. Gen. Virol. 96(Pt 4), 822–832 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lujambio, A. et al. Non-cell-autonomous tumor suppression by p53. Cell 153, 449–460 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Nguyen, L. N. et al. Inhibition of TRF2 accelerates telomere attrition and DNA damage in naive CD4 T cells during HCV infection. Cell Death Dis. 9, 900 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Rizzo, A. et al. SIRT6 interacts with TRF2 and promotes its degradation in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1820–1834 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Tarocchi, M. et al. Carcinogen-induced hepatic tumors in KLF6+/- mice recapitulate aggressive human hepatocellular carcinoma associated with p53 pathway deregulation. Hepatology 54, 22–531 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Furth, N. et al. p53 shades of Hippo. Cell Death Differ. 25, 81–92 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kremer-Tal, S. et al. Downregulation of KLF6 is an early event in hepatocarcinogenesis, and stimulates proliferation while reducing differentiation. J. Hepatol. 46, 645–654 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Dixit, U. et al. FUSE binding protein 1 facilitates persistent hepatitis C virus replication in hepatoma cells by regulating tumor suppressor p53. J. Virol. 89, 7905–7921 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Gu, J. et al. Inhibition of p53 prevents diabetic cardiomyopathy by preventing early-stage apoptosis and cell senescence, reduced glycolysis, and impaired angiogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 9, 82 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Vespasiani-Gentilucci, U., Gallo, P., De Vincentis, A., Galati, G. & Picardi, A. Hepatitis C virus and metabolic disorder interactions towards liver damage and atherosclerosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 2825–2838 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Alter, G. et al. Single-stranded RNA derived from HIV-1 serves as a potent activator of NK cells. J. Immunol. 178, 7658–7666 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ioannou, G. N. et al. The prevalence of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Hepatology 57, 249–257 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Brau, N. et al. Presentation and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients: a U.S.-Canadian multicenter study. J. Hepatol. 47, 527–537 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Torgersen, J. et al. HIV RNA, CD4+ percentage, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by cirrhosis status. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 11, djz214 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Park, I. W. et al. HIV-1 Nef is transferred from expressing T cells to hepatocytic cells through conduits and enhances HCV replication. PLoS ONE 9, e99545 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Mossanen, J. C. et al. CXCR6 inhibits hepatocarcinogenesis by promoting natural killer T- and CD4(+)T-cell-dependent control of senescence. Gastroenterology 156, 1877–1889. e1874 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Ma, C. et al. NAFLD causes selective CD4(+) T lymphocyte loss and promotes hepato carcinogenesis. Nature 531, 253–257 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Sawyer, N. et al. Protein Domain Mimics as Modulators of Protein-Protein Interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 1313–1322 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Cooper, A. et al. HIV-1 causes CD4 cell death through DNA-dependent protein kinase during viral integration. Nature 498, 376–379 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Shi, B. et al. Inhibition of HIV early replication by the p53 and its downstream gene p21. Virol. J. 15, 53 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Raja, R., Ronsard, L., Lata, S., Trivedi, S. & Banerjea, A. C. HIV-1 Tat potently stabilises Mdm2 and enhances viral replication. Biochem J. 474, 2449–2464 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Mlcochova, P., Caswell, S. J., Taylor, I. A., Towers, G. J. & Gupta, R. K. DNA damage induced by topoisomerase inhibitors activates SAMHD1 and blocks HIV-1 infection of macrophages. Embo J. 37, 50–62 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Breton, Y. et al. Expression of MDM2 in macrophages promotes the early postentry steps of HIV-1 infection through inhibition of p53. J. Virol. 93, e01871–18 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Osei Kuffour, E., Konig, R., Haussinger, D., Schulz, W. A. & Munk, C. ISG15 deficiency enhances HIV-1 infection by accumulating misfolded p53. mBio 10, e01342–19 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Massoud, O. & Charlton, M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Liver Dis. 22, 201–211 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Anstee, Q. M., Reeves, H. L., Kotsiliti, E., Govaere, O. & Heikenwalder, M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 411–428 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Gordon, S., Fraysse, J., Li, S., Ozbay, A. B. & Wong, R. J. Disease severity is associated with higher healthcare utilization in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis medicare patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 115, 562–574 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Bjorkstrom, K. et al. Risk factors for severe liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 2769–2775. e2764 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Guillen-Sacoto, M. J. et al. Human germline hedgehog pathway mutations predispose to fatty liver. J. Hepatol. 67, 809–817 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Kung, C. P. et al. The P72R polymorphism of p53 predisposes to obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Cell Rep. 14, 2413–2425 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ki Kim, S. et al. TERT promoter mutations and chromosome 8p loss are characteristic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J. Cancer 139, 2512–2518 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Wu, H., Ng, R., Chen, X., Steer, C. J. & Song, G. MicroRNA-21 is a potential link between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma via modulation of the HBP1-p53-Srebp1c pathway. Gut 65, 1850–1860 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Font-Burgada, J. et al. Hybrid periportal hepatocytes regenerate the injured liver without giving rise to cancer. Cell 162, 766–779 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Hijmans, B. S., Grefhorst, A., Oosterveer, M. H. & Groen, A. K. Zonation of glucose and fatty acid metabolism in the liver: mechanism and metabolic consequences. Biochimie 96, 121–129 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    He, G. et al. Identification of liver cancer progenitors whose malignant progression depends on autocrine IL-6 signaling. Cell 155, 384–396 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Walerych, D. et al. Wild-type p53 oligomerizes more efficiently than p53 hot-spot mutants and overcomes mutant p53 gain-of-function via a “dominant-positive” mechanism. Oncotarget 9, 32063–32080 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Dhar, D. et al. Liver cancer initiation requires p53 Inhibition by CD44-enhanced growth factor signaling. Cancer Cell. 33, 1061–1077. e1066 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Patouraux, S. et al. CD44 is a key player in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 67, 328–338 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Yan, X. et al. Replication Study: The microRNA miR-34a inhibits prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by directly repressing CD44. Elife 8, e43511 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Mondal, A. M. et al. Δ133p53α, a natural p53 isoform, contributes to conditional reprogramming and long-term proliferation of primary epithelial cells. Cell Death Dis. 9, 750 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Besse-Patin, A. et al. Estrogen signals through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1alpha to reduce oxidative damage associated with diet-induced fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 152, 243–256 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Basu, S. et al. Mutant p53 controls tumor metabolism and metastasis by regulating PGC-1alpha. Genes Dev. 32, 230–243 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Huang, Q. et al. CD147 promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism and cell proliferation in HCC cells by inhibiting the p53-dependent signaling pathway. J. Hepatol. 61, 859–866 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Miyazaki, M. et al. The p53 activator overcomes resistance to ALK inhibitors by regulating p53-target selectivity in ALK-driven neuroblastomas. Cell Death Disco. 56, 4 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Martinez-Lopez, N. et al. Activation of LKB1-Akt pathway independent of phosphor- inositide3-kinase plays a critical role in the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 52, 1621–1631 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Yan, Z., Miao, X., Zhang, B. & Xie, J. p53 as a double-edged sword in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Life Sci. 215, 64–72 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Derdak, Z. et al. Inhibition of p53 attenuates steatosis and liver injury in a mouse model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 58, 785–791 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Derdak, Z. et al. Activation of p53 enhances apoptosis and insulin resistance in a rat model of alcoholic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 54, 164–172 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Castro, R. E. et al. miR-34a/SIRT1/p53 is suppressed by ursodeoxycholic acid in the rat liver and activated by disease severity in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 58, 119–125 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Li, K., Lv, G. & Pan, L. Sirt1 alleviates LPS induced inflammation of periodontal ligament fibroblasts via downregulation of TLR4. Int J. Biol. Macromol. 119, 249–254 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Aleksandrova, K. et al. Inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers and risk of liver and biliary tract cancer. Hepatology 60, 858–871 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Bergmann, J. et al. IL-6 trans-signaling is essential for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Hepatology 65, 89–103 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Amaral, J. D., Castro, R. E., Sola, S., Steer, C.J. & Rodrigues, C.M. Ursodeoxycholic acid modulates the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway of p53. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 400, 649–654 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Fang, L. et al. Enhanced breast cancer progression by mutant p53 is inhibited by the circular RNA circ-Ccnb1. Cell Death Differ. 25, 2195–2208 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Guan, Y. S. et al. p53 gene therapy in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoe- mbolization for HCC: one-year follow-up. World J. Gastroenterol. 217, 2143–2149 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Chen, S. et al. Clinical therapeutic effect and biological monitoring of p53 gene in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 24–29 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Yang, Z. X. et al. Clinical study of recombinant adenovirus-p53 combined with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 136, 625–630 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Wei, J. C. et al. Sorafenib inhibits proliferation and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells via up-regulation of p53 and suppressing FoxM1. Acta Pharm. Sin. 36, 241–251 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Kong, N. et al. Synthetic mRNA nanoparticle-mediated restoration of p53 tumor suppressor sensitizes p53-deficient cancers to mTOR inhibition. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaaw1565 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Gomes, S. et al. SLMP53-2 restores wild-type-like function to mutant p53 through Hsp70: promising activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 11, E1151 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Sanchez, D. I. et al. Melatonin modulates dysregulated circadian clocks in mice with diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Pineal Res. 65, e12506 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Liu, Y. et al. A novel indolizine derivative induces apoptosis through the mitochondria p53 pathway in HepG2 cells. Front Pharm. 10, 762 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Nazmy, E. A. et al. Targeting p53/TRAIL/caspase-8 signaling by adiponectin reverses thioacet- amide-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. Environ. Toxicol. Pharm. 72, 03240 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Kim, J. et al. Wild-Type p53 promotes cancer metabolic switch by inducing PUMA-dependent suppression of oxidative phosphorylation. Cancer Cell. 35, 191–203.e198 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Li, C. L. et al. Elevated p53 promotes the processing of miR-18a to decrease estrogen receptor-α in female hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J. Cancer 136, 761–770 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Cao, H. et al. Abnormal expression of ERα in cholangiocytes of patients with primary biliary cholangitis mediated intrahepatic bile duct inflammation. Front. Immunol. 10, 2815 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Wang, W. et al. MDM2-NFAT1 dual inhibitor, MA242: effective against hepatocellular carcinoma, independent of p53. Cancer Lett. 459, 156–167 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Wang, W. et al. The pyrido[b]indole MDM2 inhibitor SP-141 exerts potent therapeutic effects in breast cancer models. Nat. Commun. 5, 5086 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Wang, W. et al. Identification of a new class of MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits growth of orthotopic pancreatic tumors in mice. Gastroenterology 147, 893–902. e892 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Khan, M. W. et al. Synergism of cisplatin-oleanolic acid co-loaded calcium carbonate nano- particles on hepatocellular carcinoma cells for enhanced apoptosis and reduced hepato toxicity. Int J. Nanomed. 14, 3753–3771 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Hong, M., Li, J., Li, S. & Almutairi, M.M. Acetylshikonin sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to apoptosis through ROS-mediated caspase activation. Cells 8, E1466 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Thomas, N. S., George, K. & Selvam, A.A.A. Troxerutin subdues hepatic tumorigenesis via disrupting the MDM2-p53 interaction. Food Funct. 9, 5336–5349 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Chen, S. L. et al. Loss of RDM1 enhances hepatocellular carcinoma progression via p53 and Ras/Raf/ERK pathways. Mol. Oncol. 14, 373–386 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Di Leo, L. et al. Forcing ATGL expression in hepatocarcinoma cells imposes glycolytic rewiring through PPAR-alpha/p300-mediated acetylation of p53. Oncogene 38, 1860–1875 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Shao, Y. et al. MicroRNA-621 acts as a tumor radiosensitizer by directly targeting SETDB1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Ther. 27, 355–364 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Ye, J. et al. RBM38 plays a tumor-suppressor role via stabilizing the p53-mdm2 loop function in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 212 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Zhang, Y. Y. & Zhou, L. M. Sirt3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth through reducing Mdm2-mediated p53 degradation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 423, 26–31 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Liu, X. et al. Reducing protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 as a prospective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 9, 534 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Zhao, J. et al. SIRT7 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma response to therapy by altering the p53-dependent cell death pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 52 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Xie, X. et al. MYL6B, a myosin light chain, promotes MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and drives HCC development. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 28 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiang Xia or Wei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by I. Amelio

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, H., Chen, X., Wang, Z. et al. The role of MDM2–p53 axis dysfunction in the hepatocellular carcinoma transformation. Cell Death Discov. 6, 53 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links