Abstract
The prevalence of diabetes steadily increases worldwide mirroring the prevalence of obesity. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is activated in diabetes and contributes to β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis through the activation of a terminal unfolded protein response (UPR). Our results uncover a new role for Bax Inhibitor-One (BI-1), a negative regulator of inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1α) in preserving β-cell health against terminal UPR-induced apoptosis and pyroptosis in the context of supraphysiological loads of insulin production. BI-1-deficient mice experience a decline in endocrine pancreatic function in physiological and pathophysiological conditions, namely obesity induced by high-fat diet (HFD). We observed early-onset diabetes characterized by hyperglycemia, reduced serum insulin levels, β-cell loss, increased pancreatic lipases and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the progression of metabolic dysfunction. Pancreatic section analysis revealed that BI-1 deletion overburdens unfolded proinsulin in the ER of β-cells, confirmed by ultrastructural signs of ER stress with overwhelmed IRE1α endoribonuclease (RNase) activity in freshly isolated islets. ER stress led to β-cell dysfunction and islet loss, due to an increase in immature proinsulin granules and defects in insulin crystallization with the presence of Rod-like granules. These results correlated with the induction of autophagy, ER phagy, and crinophagy quality control mechanisms, likely to alleviate the atypical accumulation of misfolded proinsulin in the ER. In fine, BI-1 in β-cells limited IRE1α RNase activity from triggering programmed β-cell death through apoptosis and pyroptosis (caspase-1, IL-1β) via NLRP3 inflammasome activation and metabolic dysfunction. Pharmaceutical IRE1α inhibition with STF-083010 reversed β-cell failure and normalized the metabolic phenotype. These results uncover a new protective role for BI-1 in pancreatic β-cell physiology as a stress integrator to modulate the UPR triggered by accumulating unfolded proinsulin in the ER, as well as autophagy and programmed cell death, with consequences on β-cell function and insulin secretion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The International Diabetes Federation reports that diabetes affects 537 million adults worldwide and is predicted to rise to 783 million by 2045 [1]. Obesity leads to insulin resistance favoring metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. Increasing our understanding of the molecular pathways behind the inhibition of insulin signal transduction and subsequent loss of functional β-cell mass remains a crucial challenge to define new therapeutic strategies. Growing experimental evidence suggests that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress may contribute to peripheral insulin resistance [2, 3] and play a role in premature pancreatic β-cell demise in diabetes in humans and preclinical animal models [4].
Pancreatic β-cells are responsible for insulin synthesis, storage, and secretion as the guardians of glucose homeostasis [5]. With insulin resistance, insulin production first increases, which overburdens the ER where proinsulin synthesis and folding occur. This overload causes ER stress and activates an evolutionarily conserved adaptative mechanism known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR is mediated by three transmembrane sensors: inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1α), PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6α) that bind intraluminally in unstressed conditions to the glucose-regulated protein and ER chaperone (BiP). Above a critical threshold of misfolded protein accumulation (e.g., proinsulin in β-cell ER), BiP dissociates from the sensors, thereby priming all branches for activation. With low levels of ER stress, a beneficial “physiological” induction of the UPR promotes β-cell homeostasis and adaptation to the demand for insulin production [3]. However, upon higher levels of ER stress as observed in obesity, a “pathophysiological” ER stress shifts the UPR to a terminal signaling cascade that induces apoptosis, notably via C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), an apoptotic transcription factor whose expression is highly induced by ER stress in β-cells [6].
Genetic mutations in UPR components result in β-cell failure and diabetes in humans and mice [2, 3], implicating the UPR machinery in the proper functioning and survival of β-cells. Elevated ER stress, terminal UPR, apoptosis, and inflammation were reported in islets of diabetic patients and in animal models [3, 7]. Indeed, obese conditions perpetuated ER stress in β-cells, causing β-cell exhaustion and apoptosis that led to the progressive decline of insulin secretion [5]. Interestingly, misfolded proinsulin alone can cause diabetes in both humans in mice. In the Akita mouse model that recapitulates aspects of human monogenic diabetes, the Ins2C96Y mutation resulted in misfolded proinsulin accumulation, ER stress, terminal UPR, and β-cell apoptosis, specifically by CHOP [6]. Since then, studies have strengthened the causal role of ER stress-mediated cell death and inflammation in diabetes [8, 9]. Discovering novel links in the switching process from adaptive to terminal UPR outputs in pancreatic β-cells undergoing ER stress is a potential strategy for diabetes treatment.
We postulated that Bax Inhibitor-1 (BI-1), an evolutionarily conserved ER transmembrane protein and apoptotic suppressor, could play a key role in the pathophysiology of diabetes [10]. BI-1 deletion may sensitize the pancreas to β-cell death and to diabetes, given that BI-1 is a negative regulator of IRE1α, the most conserved UPR sensor endowed with serine/threonine kinase and endoribonuclease (RNase) activities. IRE1α RNase activity leads to the unconventional splicing of XBP1 mRNA, translated into a transcription factor, sXBP1, that promotes ER protein folding and the adaptive UPR. Under chronic ER stress, sXBP1 activates target genes implicated in inflammation and apoptosis. IRE1α’s RNase activity also cleaves mRNAs and miRNAs through regulated IRE1α-dependent decay (RIDD) contributing to inflammation, metabolic perturbations, and programmed cell death [11]. IRE1α cleavage of miR17 leads to thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) accumulation, the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, and caspase-1-dependent interleukin (IL)-1β production, which can trigger pyroptosis that contributes to diabetes progression in humans and mice [12, 13].
We previously reported that the UPR induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation and hepatocyte death in steatohepatitis [14]. We next observed that BI-1 protects mice from an IRE1α-dependent metabolic derailment coupled with activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, liver injury with hepatocyte loss attributed to programmed cell death in steatohepatitis [15]. Since the liver and pancreas are both major secretory organs, we hypothesized that BI-1 deficiency increases pancreatic β-cell sensitivity towards unrestricted IRE1α signaling-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, programmed cell death, and metabolic dysfunction, contributing to the onset of diabetes. Our results reveal an important role for BI-1 in secretory cell adaptation to ER stress in the context of supraphysiological loads of insulin production.
Results
BI-1 deficiency causes premature hyperglycemia through islet ER stress-dependent impaired insulin secretion
Since we and others previously reported that BI-1, a master rheostat of ER stress, is invariably associated with the perturbation of glucose homeostasis [10, 15], we first confirmed our original observation [10] that BI-1−/− mice exhibit perturbed glucose homeostasis after administration of an intraperitoneal bolus of glucose not only after high-fat diet (HFD) feeding but also on normal chow diet (ND; Fig. S1A and S1B). Unexpectedly, this occurred without significant changes in body weight or lipidaemia compared to control mice, even on HFD (Fig. S1C–F and S1G–J). Similar energy expenditure, respiratory quotient, food intake, and locomotor activity between genotypes measured by indirect calorimetry confirmed the absence of whole-body metabolic imbalance (data not shown). These findings suggested that impaired glucose homeostasis in BI-1−/− mice could be due to defects in insulin secretion rather than peripheral insulin resistance. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed that serum glucose levels were higher while insulin levels were lower in BI-1−/− compared to BI-1+/+ mice in both ND and HFD conditions (Fig. 1A, B). Persistent hyperglycemia appeared at 8 weeks of age in ND-fed BI-1−/− mice, resembling an early diabetes phenotype (Fig. 1C). This prompted us to directly evaluate glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in ND-fed BI-1−/− mice. In contrast to BI-1+/+ mice, a glucose bolus did not increase plasma insulin levels in BI-1−/− mice (Fig. 1D), suggesting that BI-1-deficient β-cells secrete insufficient amounts of insulin required to maintain normal glucose levels. PERK can regulate insulin secretion from the endocrine pancreas [16,17,18,19]. However, our immunoblotting analysis revealed similar levels of phosphorylated PERK in all mice (data not shown). In contrast, we observed significantly increased phosphorylated-IRE1α, sXBP1, CHOP protein expression, and absence of BI-1 in freshly isolated pancreas from BI-1–/– compared to BI-1+/+ mice (Fig. 1E and Fig. S1K).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed that BI-1–/– β-cells presented with swollen and fragmented ER, characteristic of ER stress (Fig. 1F). In line with sXBP1 induction [20], ER-resident proteins harboring the KDEL motif (e.g., BiP, GRP94 and PDI) displayed significantly higher expression in BI-1−/− pancreases (Fig. 1G and Fig. S1L). Collectively, these data reveal that BI-1 pancreatic deficiency promotes an ER stress response dependent on IRE1α signaling, which is consistent with our earlier observations in other tissues [15]. To delineate whether this effect was specific to β-cells, we freshly isolated them. BI-1 deletion rendered β-cells more vulnerable to ER stress-dependent IRE1α RNase activity shown by mRNA induction of Xbp1 and Ddit3 (encoding CHOP), but not Hspa5 (encoding BIP) or Atf4 (Fig. 1H). Hence, we speculate that hyperglycemia in BI-1–/– mice may be primarily due to an ER stress-dependent dysfunction of the endocrine pancreas to secrete adequate amounts of insulin at an early age or under diet-induced diabetic conditions.
BI-1 deletion leads to pancreatic β-cell loss
Histological analysis of pancreatic sections revealed no major structural differences in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained exocrine pancreases between BI-1+/+ and BI-1–/– mice fed either ND or HFD. To evaluate the balance between α- and β-cell adaptation in pancreatic islets, we performed immunohistochemistry for glucagon and insulin, respectively (Fig. 2A). Glucagon immunostaining revealed no differences in pancreatic α-cell mass, location, or repartition between BI-1+/+ and BI-1–/– mice on either ND or HFD (Fig. 2A), suggesting no glucagon insufficiency in the endocrine pancreas of BI-1–/– mice. However, anapathological examination of H&E and insulin-positive staining revealed reduced pancreatic islet mass in these animals in both feeding conditions (Fig. 2A) Quantification of pancreatic islet size, and number confirmed that BI-1 deficiency reduced functional β-cell mass by fewer islets per area, independently of islet size differences (Fig. 2B, C) or percentage of pancreatic weight (Fig. 2D). Hence, a deficiency in BI-1 resulting in unrestrained IRE1α/XBP1 signaling may predispose to pancreatic islet loss, a hallmark of early-onset diabetes that can be exacerbated upon diet-induced diabetes.
Lack of BI-1 and induction of UPR signalling promotes autophagy, inflammatory response, and ultimately pancreatic-β-cell death resembling monogenic-like diabetes
While WT (BI-1+/+) mice presented mature and immature insulin granules typical of healthy pancreatic β-cells analyzed by TEM (Figure S2Aa), BI-1–/– β-cells revealed an atypical accumulation of autophagosomes (Fig. S2Ab), and lysosomes (Fig. S2Afg). We also observed ultrastructural features of ER-phagy (Fig. S2Acdj), crinophagy (Fig. S2Ae), and mitophagy (Fig. S2Ai) in β-cells of BI-1–/– but not WT mice, highlighting a mobilization of quality control mechanisms to cope with ER stress.
We then analyzed the levels of autophagy markers in pancreatic lysates from BI-1–/– mice. A higher amplitude of LC3-II conversion [21, 22] and a slight increase in basal p62/SQSTM1 expression was observed in BI-1−/− mice by immunoblotting analysis (Figs. S2B and S3A). Accordingly, a significantly higher expression of the Atg5–Atg12 complex and a stronger accumulation of total ubiquitinylated proteins on Lysin 63 (K63) were observed in BI-1–/– compared to WT pancreas (Figs. S2C and S3B). BI-1–/– mice exhibited reduced expression of the mitophagy markers Parkin and COX4 (Figs. S2D and S3C), indicating increased mitochondrial degradation through mitophagy.
Because autophagy, inflammation, and programmed β-cell death are interconnected to preserve cell homeostasis, we next evaluated the inflammatory response in BI-1–/– mice, specifically NLRP3 inflammasome activation. BI-1–/– pancreases presented significantly increased expression of NLRP3 protein, correlating with higher levels of active-caspase-1 and IL-1β than WT pancreases (Fig. 3A and Fig. S3D). Furthermore, pancreatic sections from BI-1–/– mice had more myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive cells compared to WT mice, reflecting abnormal inflammatory myeloid cell infiltration (Fig. 3B), as reported in diabetic patients [7]. This was associated with elevated serum levels of pancreatic lipases (Fig. 3C), and inflammatory markers (i.e, IFNγ, TNFα, MCP-1, IL-12, IL-10, and IL-6) (Fig. 3D), reflecting pancreatic injury in BI-1–/– mice. This prompted us to evaluate the impact of BI-1 deficiency on programmed cell death in pancreatic islets. Immunoblotting analysis revealed significantly increased cleaved caspase-3 and pro-apoptotic Puma, a BH3-only protein that inhibits the anti-apoptotic BCL2, in BI-1–/– mice (Fig. 3E and Fig. S3E). Cells undergoing pyroptosis, like apoptosis, incur DNA damage and become positive by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Pancreatic sections from BI-1-deficient mice had a greater number of TUNEL+ β-cells compared to WT mice (Fig. 3F), which persisted after HFD, with no difference in β-cell proliferation (Ki-67+; not shown).
Further investigation of the ultrastructural pancreatic β-cell phenotype revealed well-preserved α-cells in pancreatic sections from BI-1-deficient mice (Fig. 4Ai). However, pancreatic sections from BI-1-deficient animals presented apoptotic features specifically in β-cells, with chromatin and cytosol condensation, altered mitochondria (Fig. 4Aii, iv), and the presence of lipofuscin granules, a marker of senescence (Fig. 4Aiv). Overall, BI-1-deficient pancreases exhibited higher levels of ER stress-induced adaptive autophagy and inflammasome activation that are most likely the culprit of apoptotic and pyroptotic cell death and subsequent loss of β-cells, as observed in monogenic diabetes.
Increased immature insulin granules with higher relative content of proinsulin in pancreatic islets is associated with β-cell dysfunction in BI-1-deficient mice
Impaired insulin secretion was previously linked to excessive β-cell death [23] in diabetes and an imbalance between efficient mature insulin granule formation with a compensatory accumulation of non-functional immature insulin granules [24,25,26]. Typical mature insulin granules exhibit a dense homogenous core with a well-defined halo, whereas immature granules exhibit an empty or lighter core without a defined halo (Fig. 4Av, vi). No differences in the number of total insulin granules per area were observed between BI-1–/– and WT β-cells (Fig. 4B), while the percentage of immature insulin granules revealed a nearly two-fold significant increase in BI-1–/– β-cells (Fig. 4C). In addition, we detected the presence of rod-like granules (Fig. 4D), ultrastructural characteristics resulting from insulin crystallization and packaging defects [27, 28], in significantly greater abundance in BI-1–/– versus WT β-cells. These observations were corroborated by insulin immunogold staining, which was stronger in insulin granules of BI-1–/– mice showing more numerous immature granules (Fig. 4Eb, d; outlined) than BI-1+/+ mice (Fig. 4Ea, c). Insulin immunogold staining further confirmed the insulin granules were located in autolysosomes (Fig. S2E). Finally, we reported a significantly stronger expression of proinsulin protein in BI-1−/− compared to WT pancreases (Fig. 4F, G). Pancreatic β-cell loss in BI-1-deficient mice is most likely driven by misfolded insulin accumulation, responsible for stressed β-cells and progressive pancreatic β-cell identity loss, as shown by ultrastructural signs of senescence and apoptosis.
BI-1 deletion increases ER stress-induced inflammasome activation and cell death in human and mouse β-cells
The relevance of BI-1 loss on IRE1α-dependent inflammasome activation and cell death was investigated in the human β-cell line EndoCβH1 in response to chemical ER stress agents, i.e., tunicamycin and thapsigargin. Like our observations in the BI-1–/– pancreases, BI-1-silenced human β-cells exhibited increased ER stress-induced cell death compared to control β-cells (Fig. 5A). Because effector caspases are required for the execution phases of apoptosis, we used the pan caspase inhibitor N-Benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp(O-Me) fluoromethyl ketone (Z-VAD-fmk). ER stress-induced cell death was suppressed with Z-VAD-fmk, suggesting apoptosis (Fig. 5B). BI-1-silenced human β-cells also displayed activated IRE1α signaling with phospho-IRE1α and sXBP1 protein accumulation (Fig. 5C and Fig. S4A, B) and inflammasome activation, shown by higher active-caspase-1(p36) protein levels and a tendency to increase the pro-IL-1β protein levels, when treated with ER stressors (Fig. 5C and Fig. S4C–E). Mimicking inflammation with various cytokine cocktails in the media was insufficient to promote cell death in BI-1-silenced β-cells (data not shown), indicative of inflammation as a consequence rather than cause of BI-1-dependent ER stress. To complete these data, and in particular, to explore the role of necroptosis and its potential regulation by BI-1, we conducted experiments using Necrostatin-1 (NEC), a specific inhibitor of necroptosis (Fig. 5B). The use of Nec-1 failed to rescue cell death in our experimental conditions, suggesting that necroptosis is not involved.
These data were confirmed in the murine β-cell line MIN6. Compared to control β-cells, BI-1-silenced murine β-cells displayed increased ER stress-induced cell death. Thapsigargin-induced cell death was significantly suppressed with the broad effector caspase inhibitor Q-Val-Asp fluoromethyl ketone (QVD-fmk), supporting the concept that BI-1 protects against ER stress-induced apoptosis in these cells (Fig. S5A).
We next tested the relevance of using Ac-YVAD-fmk (Ac-Tyr-Val-Ala-Asp- fluoromethyl ketone), a caspase-1 inhibitor in our experimental conditions. Thapsigargin-induced cell death was significantly reduced with YVAD-fmk, suggesting that BI-1 seems cytoprotective against ER stress-induced-caspase-1- and-inflammasome activation in these cells. Finally, combining QVD-fmk and Ac-YVAD-fmk completely rescued the thapsigargin-induced cell death in MIN6 (Fig. S5B). In all experiments, after 48 h of silencing, we observed markedly reduced BI-1 protein levels (Fig. S5C) with mirroring increases in XBP1 mRNA levels (Fig. S5D), supporting the notion that a reduction in BI-1 might favor enhanced ER stress, through IRE1α, in MIN6 cells.
Overall, these results strengthened the model that BI-1-deletion makes β-cells more vulnerable to ER stress-induced-programmed cell death through apoptosis and pyroptosis.
Together, these findings strongly suggest a conserved function of BI-1 in mammalian β-cells with human pathological relevance.
Pharmaceutical IRE1α inhibition reverses β-cell failure and associated metabolic disorders
Given the regulatory function of BI-1, we hypothesized that inhibiting IRE1α activity may protect against β-cell failure and diabetes. Thus, we evaluated the potential of treating mice in a regression model: BI-1–/– mice on a 3-month HFD to induce IRE1α RNase activity-dependent ER stress, β-cell dysfunction, and diabetes were treated with an inhibitor of IRE1α RNase activity, STF-083010, twice a week during the last two weeks of diet (Fig. 6A). Body weight gain and pancreas weight were similar in both BI-1–/– and WT mice, irrespective of STF-083010 or vehicle treatment (data not shown). Nevertheless, targeting IRE1α RNase activity normalized blood glucose concentrations in both BI-1–/– and WT mice fed HFD (Fig. 6B), reduced hyperinsulinemia (Fig. 6C) and pancreatic lipase levels (Fig. 6D), reflecting an improvement in glucose homeostasis and β-cell function. Consistently, STF-083010 significantly decreased myeloid cell infiltration (Fig. S6A) and sera pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (Fig. S6B) in BI-1–/– mice. STF-083010 limited pancreatic injury and associated inflammation caused by BI-1 deficiency. Intriguingly, STF-083010 did not rescue the reduction in islet number observed in HFD-fed BI-1–/– mice, although this treatment slightly increased islet size in diabetic HFD-fed control animals (Fig. 6E, F). We next explored whether inhibition of IRE1α RNase activity could improve β-cell function in BI-1–/–pancreas. Analysis of pancreatic sections by TEM revealed that STF-083010 decreased the ultrastructural evidence of β-cell apoptosis (chromatin condensation and cell shrinkage) and reduced the presence of altered mitochondria and autophagolysosomes (Fig. 6G). STF-083010 normalized the ultrastructural signs of ER stress, with restored regularly spaced stacks of ER sheets (Fig. 6G) β-cell function improvement after STF-083010 treatment in the pancreases of HFD-fed BI-1–/– mice was associated with increased total insulin granules (Fig. 5H), likely due to improved granule size and functionality since STF-083010 normalized granule size originally hypertrophied in HFD-BI-1 KO mice (Fig. 5I). Thus, we uncovered a potential novel role for BI-1 in regulating IRE1α’s RNase activity and ER stress in the balance between pancreatic inflammation and apoptosis with consequences on β-cell function and insulin secretion.
Discussion
In the natural history of diabetes, the progressive decline in β-cell function precedes the loss of β-cell functional mass; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear but may involve the ER stress response. Even if the upstream stresses differ between types 1 and 2 diabetes, with an autoimmune attack against the β-cells or the development of peripheral insulin resistance, respectively, the downstream outcome would be similar. The remaining β-cells would be overworked and experience critical ER stress levels resulting in β-cell dysfunction and death through terminal UPR activation. Our results bring new insights into the protective and adaptative role of BI-1 against the detrimental outputs of the UPR during ER stress in β-cells.
We revealed that BI-1 deficiency causes a progressive decline in endocrine pancreatic function in physiological and pathophysiological conditions. A close correlation was observed between hyperglycemia, reduced serum insulin levels, loss of β-cell mass, and metabolic disorders in BI-1-deficient mice, resembling early-onset diabetes. Both the endocrine and exocrine pancreas developed normally, indicating that endocrine dysfunction is acquired postnatally. Hence, we found that BI-1 deletion leads to ER stress in β-cells, coupled with β-cell dysfunction due to increased immature proinsulin granules and defective insulin crystallization with Rod-like granules. These observations correlated with autophagy induction, likely to alleviate the accumulation of misfolded proinsulin in the ER and cope with ER stress. In fine, in BI-1-deficient pancreatic islets, sustained IRE1α signaling triggers programmed β-cell death with the activation of apoptosis and pyroptosis through NLRP3 activation.
In BI-1-deficient β-cells, the inability to properly fold large, secretory loads may cause accumulation of unfolded proinsulin within the ER, explaining the vulnerability to ER stress-induced-programmed cell death. Ultrastructural analysis of BI-1–/– pancreas confirmed striking abnormal changes in ER morphology, a hallmark of ER stress and UPR activation. While α-cells looked morphologically normal, β-cells from BI-1–/– mice presented massive ER lumen dilation with accumulation of large quantities of electron-dense material, suggesting ER stress with deposition of unfolded proteins in the ER. Similar observations were reported in both Akita and Munich mouse models, in which the insulin mutations cause proinsulin misfolding-induced terminal UPR [6], β-cell failure, and neonatal diabetes [29,30,31]. Akita-like insulin mutations cause rare infantile diabetes described in humans [29]. Eif2ak3–/– mice developed similar phenotypes with hyperglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, ER stress, β-cell loss, misfolded insulin, and defects in the secretory pathway causing accumulation of proinsulin in the ER [16]. Wolcott-Rallison syndrome in humans [19] is characterized by infantile diabetes with defects in insulin secretion and folding [17, 32]. Mutations in the human PERK-encoding Eif2ak3 gene were reported in two families with the syndrome [19].
In contrast, the role of IRE1α in β-cell and insulin biogenesis is less established. IRE1α is involved in β-cell failure in the Wolfram syndrome, also known as DIDMOAD (diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness) [33]. The Wolfram syndrome 1 gene (Wfs1) encodes an ER-resident protein associated with protein misfolding and β-cell failure. As XBP1s activates the Wfs1 promoter, the IRE1α-XBP1s-WFS1 pathway represents a direct link between protein misfolding in the ER, the UPR, β-cell breakdown, and a diabetic patient cohort [34]. In transgenic mice, Xbp1 deletion in β-cells impaired proinsulin processing, blunted glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and caused IRE1α hyperactivation [35]. In turn, an overactive RIDD cleaved prohormone convertase mRNA [35], interfering in insulin maturation and secretion. Under hyperglycemic conditions, the RIDD can cleave insulin mRNA and reduce insulin production [36, 37]. Such signaling nodes may participate in our models.
At the ER membrane, IRE1α activity is tightly regulated by the UPRosome [38] involving UPR transducers, scaffold proteins, phosphatases, and ER-bound RNAs that physically bind to IRE1α in response to ER stress. IRE1α may cleave ER-bound RNAs, such BI-1 [39], strengthening the concept that BI-1 acts as a rheostat in diabetes. In addition, PDIA1, which supports proinsulin maturation [40], or changes in luminal acidification [41] may be specifically implicated, considering BI-1 activity can be regulated in acidification conditions [42]. Furthermore, the presence of rod-like granules [27, 28] in BI-1-deficient mice may be due to impaired calcium homeostasis causing insulin crystallization defects [28], since BI-1 has a significant role in maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis [43, 44]. Finally, increased insulin granule size may contribute to metabolic disorders by impairing their membrane trafficking at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) [45, 46], which could be involved in BI-1-deficient β-cells.
Our current data reveal that unresolved ER stress triggers a terminal UPR with sustained activity of IRE1α-XBP1-CHOP signaling that promotes programmed cell death, leading to pancreatic injury [47] and diabetes in BI-1-deficient mice. CHOP expression correlated with increased Puma and decreased BCL2 to promote apoptosis. This triggered mitochondrial dysfunction, shown by TEM analysis, as a downstream consequence of ER stress. The induction of JNKs, mediated by an overactive IRE1α [48], may be a contributor to β-cell death, alongside these observations. We also cannot exclude a compensatory activation of ATF6α or PERK, given the slight increase in ATF4.
Besides its cytoprotective role upon ER stress [15], our results suggest that BI-1 confers protection against IRE1α-induced caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in β-cells. Further experiments in BI-1-deficient β-cells are needed to evaluate whether other genes are affected by the RNase activity of IRE1α, such as TXNIP, a contributor to prodiabetic pathways [49], which may amplify sterile inflammation and pyroptosis in our models. The IRE1α RNase inhibitor, STF-083010, improved pancreatic injury of the BI-1–/– mice that recapitulated features of diabetes. The pancreatic inflammation observed in ND- and HFD-fed BI-1–/– mice could be a consequence of extensive tissue injury, resulting in the release of pancreatic lipase, necrosis, and TUNEL-positive β-cells. Sustained NLRP3 inflammasome activation with infiltration of neutrophils was reported in diabetes [7, 49], in line with the observation that BI-1–/– mice presented more MPO-positive cells in pancreatic sections that were corrected with IRE1α RNase inhibition. Since pharmacological targeting of the NLRP3 inflammasome alleviates pancreatic inflammation and β-cell death in preclinical models [50,51,52,53], small molecules targeting IRE1α RNase activity and/or the NLRP3 inflammasome could be attractive strategies in diabetes and chronic metabolic diseases. Our results strongly identify a novel protective role for BI-1 in pancreatic β-cell physiology as a stress integrator in β-cell function to modulate the UPR when faced with unfolded proinsulin accumulation, autophagy, and programmed cell death.
Materials and methods
Animal experimentation
BI-1+/+ (WT) and BI-1−/− were obtained from Dr. John C. Reed (SBMRI, La Jolla, CA, USA) on a C57BL/6 background by disruption of the bi-1 gene. Experiments were done on male mice at 8-week-old, 12-week-old, and 24-week-old mice. Mice were fed a Normal Diet (ND, A04–SafeDiet, Augy, France) or High-Fat Diet (HFD, 60% kJ fat, D12492 – sniff, Soest, Germany) and treated with intraperitoneal injections of STF-083010 (30 mg/kg) or vehicle (Kolliphor 16%). Mice were housed in a controlled environment with 12 h light/dark cycles and water available ad libitum.
Ethics statement
Animal procedures were conducted in compliance with the French national (MESR, Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation) guidelines for the use of experimental animals.
Histological evaluation
Pancreas tissue was fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (7 μm thick), and stained with H&E, Insulin, Glucagon, MPO, or TUNEL (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Meylan, France). Sections were evaluated with bright-field microscopy.
Electron microscopy
Pancreas was dissected, immersed in fixative 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, and stored overnight at 4 °C. Samples were rinsed in the same buffer, post-fixed for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide and 1% potassium ferrocyanide on 0.1 M cacodylate buffer to enhance the staining of membranes. Cells were then rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated in acetone at low temperature to preserve lipids and lastly embedded in epoxy resin. Contrasted ultrathin sections (70 nm) were analysed under a JEOL 1400 transmission electron microscope equipped with a Morada Olympus CCD camera. IMOD software was used to analyse images and delineate major cellular structures.
Immunogold labeling was done on epoxy sections after treatment with Sodium metaperiodate 5% in distilled water for 10 min., washes in H2O, followed by incubation in NH4Cl 50 mM in PBS, for 10 min., BSA1% in PBS for 15 min., and an overnight incubation with the primary antibody against insulin (Euromedex ref 158-48-1). After washes in PBS-BSA 0,1%, the PAG conjugated with 15 nm gold particle was added for 1 h, rinsed, briefly fixed 5 minutes with glutaraldehyde 1% in phosphate buffer, and finally sections were briefly contrasted with uranyl acetate.
Cellular models
Islet isolation, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and islet viability
For islet isolation, mouse pancreases were digested by collagenase and incubated in a water bath at 37 °C. The islets were handpicked under a stereomicroscope. The isolated islets were cultured and treated as described. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) was performed in freshly isolated islets Insulin was quantified using the Ultra-Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit (Crystal Chem, Downers Grove, USA). The GSIS experiments were performed and measured in triplicates.
The percentages of viable cells were determined using the DNA-binding dyes Propidium Iodide (PI, 5 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and Hoechst 33342 (HO, 5 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), as described [54]. The percentages of dead islets β-cells were evaluated in a minimum of 10 islets per condition. All assessments were performed by two independent researchers, including one in a blind manner.
Culture and transfection of EndoC-βH1 and cell viability
EndoC-βH1 cells were purchased from UNIVERCELL-BIOSOLUTIONS (MTA BH1-201601171) and cultured in low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 2% BSA fraction V, β-mercaptoethanol 50 µM, L-glutamine 1%, penicillin/streptomycin 2%, nicotinamide 10 mM, human transferrin 5.5 µg/ml and sodium selenite 6.7 ng/ml (all from Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium) [54, 55]. Transfections of small interfering (si)RNAs (30 nmol/L, siBI-1 : HSS110620 Invitrogen) were performed using lipofectamine RNAimax (Fisher Scientific, Aalst, Belgium).
After transfection, the cells were then treated with the indicated concentrations of z-VAD-FMK (50 μmol/L, 30 min pre-incubation, Selleck, Munich, Germany), Nec-1 (10 μmol/L, MedChemExpress, Sollentuna, Sweden), Thapsigargin (1 μM, Sigma-Aldrich), or an equal volume of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively, as specified. For viability analysis, EndoC-βH1were stimulated for 24-48 h.
EndoC-βH1 cell viability was measured by integration of viability dye (SYTOX™ Green, Invitrogen) on a Perkin Elmer VICTOR X3. The cells were treated as described. 5 mM SYTOX Green was added to cells, and the induced intensity was measured. The maximal fluorescence is obtained by full permeabilization of the cells by using Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 0.1%. This reported cell death as a percent of maximal SYTOX Green fluorescence (excitation 485 nm, emission 520 nm) from control conditions. The percentage of cell death was calculated as (induced fluorescence–background fluorescence)/(maximal fluorescence–background fluorescence) × 100. In some cases, percentage of cell death was normalized by the control condition siCtrl treated with DMSO.
Culture and transfection of MIN6 and cell death
MIN6 were obtained from the A.T.C.C. MIN6 were cultured in DMEM-High Glucose medium, 15% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% Glutamine (2 mM), and 50–55 μM beta-mercaptoethanol (1.75–2.0 μl/500 ml of medium). The cells were transfected with BI-1 siRNA (MSS272838) or control siRNA (Invitrogen, Medium) at 60 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) in OptiMEM (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were then treated with the indicated concentrations of Thapsigargin (5 μM, Sigma-Aldrich), Tunicamycin (5ug/ml), QVD-fmk (20 μM) YVAD-fmk (20 μM) (Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan), or an equal volume of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively, as specified.
Cell death was analyzed using a double fluorescent staining annexin-V-PE and 7-AAD according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Annexin-V-PE apoptosis detection kit I, BD Biosciences, Pont de claix, France). Single cell fluorescence was analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Canto II) and FlowJo software® (BD). The percentage of cell death (early and late apoptosis/death) was assessed (Annexin-V+/7-ADD- and Annexin-V+/7-ADD+).
Real-time qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from isolated pancreatic islets or cell lines (Endo-βH1 and MIN6), then reverse-transcribed for real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). RT-qPCR was performed using the ABI PRISM 7500/Step-One Fast Real-Time PCR System following the manufacturer’s protocols. Taqman gene expression assays purchased from Applied Biosystems (Courtaboeuf, France). Mouse : RPLP0 Mm99999223_gH ; BI-1 Mm00509863_m1 ; BIP Mm00517691_m1 ; CHOP Mm00492097_m1 ; XBP1 Mm00457359_m1. Human : RPLP0 Hs99999902_m1 ; BI-1 Hs00162661_m1 ; BIP Hs99999174_m1 ; CHOP Hs01090850_m1 ; XBP1 Hs00231936_m1. Gene expression values were normalized to the value of the housekeeping genes RPLP0 (Mm99999223_gH; human: Hs99999902_m1) or β2- microglobulin (Mm00437762_m1) and calculated based on the comparative cycle threshold Ct method (ΔΔCt).
Immunoblot analysis
Total protein was isolated from snap-frozen pancreas, isolated pancreatic islets or cell lines homogenized in detergent-containing buffer, normalized for protein content (30 µg/tissue and 20 µg/cell sample), and analysed by SDS-PAGE (8–15% gels).
Antibodies references: p-IRE1 : NB100–2323 ; sXBP1 (mouse) : 7160 s ; sXBP1 (human) : CS127825 ; ATF4 : sc200 ; HSP90 : 4877 S ; NLRP3 : AG-20B-0014 ; IL-1b : 2021 S ; Caspase-1 : sc-514 ; tIRE1 CS-23945 ; p-PERK : cs-3179 ; Caspase-3 : cs96625 ; Bcl2 : cs2870 ; PUMA : ab-54288 ; LC3 : NB100-220 ; p62 : 5114 S ; ATG5/ATG12 complex : 26305 ; Ub K63 : ab179434 ; Parkin : CS-2132 ; COX4 : CS-4844.
Antibody detection was accomplished using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies: Anti-Rabbit: 711-035-152 (Jackson) ; Anti-Mouse: 715-035-150 (Jackson).
The Image J software was used to measure band intensities from the immunoblots. To appreciate protein expression in pancreases, quantification was performed from several individuals for each genotype, as mentioned in the figure legend. The quantification analysis was performed from band intensities and expressed as fold change. The corresponding average quantification of the protein target compared with HSP90 levels or red-ponceau (as a loading control) was performed.
Biochemical analysis and cytokine measurement
The BD Cytometric Bead Array Mouse Inflammation Kit was used to quantitatively measure cytokines by flow cytometry as described previously [10]. Serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels were determined by enzymatic colorimetric assay (Roche – Hitachi analyser Cobas 8000, Meylan, France). NEFA were measured using the Kit NEFA-HR (2) R1 Set (434-91795 from Fujifilm).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± SEM and were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Shapiro–Wilk normality test was performed to confirm the normal distribution of the data. Statistical significance of differential gene expression between the two study groups was determined using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test, with the ΔCt of each group. Other data from mice and cells were statistically analysed by Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney or one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis for multiple group comparison. Statistical significance from control is denoted by *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001. ****P ≤ 0.0001. Following the same pattern, $ or # or £ denotes statistical significance between specified groups.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding author.
References
Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119.
Ozcan U, Yilmaz E, Ozcan L, Furuhashi M, Vaillancourt E, Smith RO, et al. Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science. 2006;313:1137–40.
Papa FR. Endoplasmic reticulum stress, pancreatic β-cell degeneration, and diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a007666.
Fernandes-da-Silva A, Miranda CS, Santana-Oliveira DA, Oliveira-Cordeiro B, Rangel-Azevedo C, Silva-Veiga FM, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress as the basis of obesity and metabolic diseases: focus on adipose tissue, liver, and pancreas. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60:2949–60.
Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ. The unfolded protein response: a pathway that links insulin demand with beta-cell failure and diabetes. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:317–33.
Oyadomari S, Koizumi A, Takeda K, Gotoh T, Akira S, Araki E, et al. Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:525–32.
Njeim R, Azar WS, Fares AH, Azar ST, Kassouf HK, Eid AA. NETosis contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;65:R65–76.
Fonseca SG, Burcin M, Gromada J, Urano F. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in β-cells and development of diabetes. Curr Opin Pharm. 2009;9:763–70.
Shrestha N, De Franco E, Arvan P, Cnop M. Pathological β-cell endoplasmic reticulum stress in type 2 diabetes: current evidence. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:650158.
Bailly-Maitre B, Belgardt BF, Jordan SD, Coornaert B, von Freyend MJ, Kleinridders A, et al. Hepatic Bax inhibitor-1 inhibits IRE1alpha and protects from obesity-associated insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:6198–207.
Hollien J, Lin JH, Li H, Stevens N, Walter P, Weissman JS. Regulated Ire1-dependent decay of messenger RNAs in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:323–31.
Lebreton F, Berishvili E, Parnaud G, Rouget C, Bosco D, Berney T, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed and regulated in human islets. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:726.
Oslowski CM, Hara T, O’Sullivan-Murphy B, Kanekura K, Lu S, Hara M, et al. Thioredoxin-interacting protein mediates ER stress-induced β cell death through initiation of the inflammasome. Cell Metab. 2012;16:265–73.
Lebeaupin C, Proics E, de Bieville CHD, Rousseau D, Bonnafous S, Patouraux S, et al. ER stress induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation and hepatocyte death. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1879.
Lebeaupin C, Vallée D, Rousseau D, Patouraux S, Bonnafous S, Adam G, et al. Bax inhibitor-1 protects from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by limiting inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha signaling in mice. Hepatology. 2018;68:515–32.
Gupta S, McGrath B, Cavener DR. PERK (EIF2AK3) regulates proinsulin trafficking and quality control in the secretory pathway. Diabetes. 2010;59:1937–47.
Harding HP, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Jungries R, Chung P, Plesken H, et al. Diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in perk−/− mice reveals a role for translational control in secretory cell survival. Mol Cell. 2001;7:1153–63.
Gao Y, Sartori DJ, Li C, Yu QC, Kushner JA, Simon MC, et al. PERK is required in the adult pancreas and is essential for maintenance of glucose homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:5129–39.
Delépine M, Nicolino M, Barrett T, Golamaully M, Lathrop GM, Julier C. EIF2AK3, encoding translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3, is mutated in patients with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;25:406–9.
Tsuchiya Y, Saito M, Kadokura H, Miyazaki JI, Tashiro F, Imagawa Y, et al. IRE1-XBP1 pathway regulates oxidative proinsulin folding in pancreatic β cells. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:1287–301.
Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes. Autophagy 2008;4:151–75.
Tanida I, Ueno T, Kominami E. LC3 and Autophagy. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;445:77–88.
Liu M, Weiss MA, Arunagiri A, Yong J, Rege N, Sun J, et al. Biosynthesis, structure, and folding of the insulin precursor protein. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:28–50.
Arunagiri A, Haataja L, Pottekat A, Pamenan F, Kim S, Zeltser LM, et al. Proinsulin misfolding is an early event in the progression to type 2 diabetes. eLife. 2019;8:e44532.
Arunagiri A, Haataja L, Cunningham CN, Shrestha N, Tsai B, Qi L, et al. Misfolded proinsulin in the endoplasmic reticulum during development of beta cell failure in diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1418:5–19.
Haataja L, Arunagiri A, Hassan A, Regan K, Tsai B, Dhayalan B, et al. Distinct states of proinsulin misfolding in MIDY. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:6017–31.
Wijesekara N, Dai FF, Hardy AB, Giglou PR, Bhattacharjee A, Koshkin V, et al. Beta cell-specific Znt8 deletion in mice causes marked defects in insulin processing, crystallisation and secretion. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1656–68.
Tong X, Kono T, Anderson-Baucum EK, Yamamoto W, Gilon P, Lebeche D, et al. SERCA2 deficiency impairs pancreatic β-cell function in response to diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2016;65:3039–52.
Støy J, Edghill EL, Flanagan SE, Ye H, Paz VP, Pluzhnikov A, et al. Insulin gene mutations as a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15040–4.
Colombo C, Porzio O, Liu M, Massa O, Vasta M, Salardi S, et al. Seven mutations in the human insulin gene linked to permanent neonatal/infancy-onset diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2148–56.
Riahi Y, Israeli T, Cerasi E, Leibowitz G. Effects of proinsulin misfolding on β-cell dynamics, differentiation and function in diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:95–103.
Zhang P, McGrath B, Li S, Frank A, Zambito F, Reinert J, et al. The PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha kinase is required for the development of the skeletal system, postnatal growth, and the function and viability of the pancreas. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:3864–74.
Kinsley BT, Swift M, Dumont RH, Swift RG. Morbidity and mortality in the Wolfram syndrome. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1566–70.
Kakiuchi C, Ishiwata M, Hayashi A, Kato T. XBP1 induces WFS1 through an endoplasmic reticulum stress response element-like motif in SH-SY5Y cells. J Neurochem. 2006;97:545–55.
Lee AH, Heidtman K, Hotamisligil GS, Glimcher LH. Dual and opposing roles of the unfolded protein response regulated by IRE1alpha and XBP1 in proinsulin processing and insulin secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:8885–90.
Han D, Lerner AG, Vande Walle L, Upton JP, Xu W, Hagen A, et al. IRE1alpha kinase activation modes control alternate endoribonuclease outputs to determine divergent cell fates. Cell. 2009;138:562–75.
Qiu Y, Mao T, Zhang Y, Shao M, You J, Ding Q, et al. A crucial role for RACK1 in the regulation of glucose-stimulated IRE1alpha activation in pancreatic beta cells. Sci Signal. 2010;3:ra7.
Hetz C, Glimcher LH. Fine-tuning of the unfolded protein response: assembling the IRE1alpha interactome. Mol Cell. 2009;35:551–61.
Acosta-Alvear D, Karagöz GE, Fröhlich F, Li H, Walther TC, Walter P. The unfolded protein response and endoplasmic reticulum protein targeting machineries converge on the stress sensor IRE1. eLife. 2018;7:e43036.
Jang I, Pottekat A, Poothong J, Yong J, Lagunas-Acosta J, Charbono A, et al. PDIA1/P4HB is required for efficient proinsulin maturation and ß cell health in response to diet induced obesity. eLife 2019;8:e44528.
Tompkins LS, Nullmeyer KD, Murphy SM, Weber CS, Lynch RM. Regulation of secretory granule pH in insulin-secreting cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283:C429–437.
Lebeaupin C, Blanc M, Vallée D, Keller H, Bailly-Maitre B. Bax Inhibitor-1: between stress and survival. FEBS J. 2020;287:1722–36.
Bultynck G, Kiviluoto S, Henke N, Ivanova H, Schneider L, Rybalchenko V, et al. The C terminus of Bax inhibitor-1 forms a Ca2+-permeable channel pore. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:2544–57.
Kiviluoto S, Schneider L, Luyten T, Vervliet T, Missiaen L, De Smedt H, et al. Bax inhibitor-1 is a novel IP3 receptor-interacting and -sensitizing protein. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e367.
Bogan JS, Xu Y, Hao M. Cholesterol accumulation increases insulin granule size and impairs membrane trafficking: cholesterol in insulin granule regulation. Traffic. 2012;13:1466–80.
Chen CW, Guan BJ, Alzahrani MR, Gao Z, Gao L, Bracey S, et al. Adaptation to chronic ER stress enforces pancreatic β-cell plasticity. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4621.
Wang XZ, Harding HP, Zhang Y, Jolicoeur EM, Kuroda M, Ron D. Cloning of mammalian Ire1 reveals diversity in the ER stress responses. EMBO J. 1998;17:5708–17.
Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science. 2000;287:664–6.
Lerner AG, Upton JP, Praveen PVK, Ghosh R, Nakagawa Y, Igbaria A, et al. IRE1α induces thioredoxin-interacting protein to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote programmed cell death under irremediable ER stress. Cell Metab. 2012;16:250–64.
Hu C, Ding H, Li Y, Pearson JA, Zhang X, Flavell RA, et al. NLRP3 deficiency protects from type 1 diabetes through the regulation of chemotaxis into the pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:11318–23.
Kim Y, Wang W, Okla M, Kang I, Moreau R, Chung S. Suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome by γ-tocotrienol ameliorates type 2 diabetes. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:66–76.
Youm YH, Adijiang A, Vandanmagsar B, Burk D, Ravussin A, Dixit VD. Elimination of the NLRP3-ASC inflammasome protects against chronic obesity-induced pancreatic damage. Endocrinology. 2011;152:4039–45.
Larsen CM, Faulenbach M, Vaag A, Vølund A, Ehses JA, Seifert B, et al. Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Engl J Med. 2007;356:1517–26.
Xiao P, Takiishi T, Violato NM, Licata G, Dotta F, Sebastiani G, et al. NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) is activated in pancreatic β-cells but does not contribute to the development of diabetes. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:476.
Dondelinger Y, Delanghe T, Priem D, Wynosky-Dolfi MA, Sorobetea D, Rojas-Rivera D, et al. Serine 25 phosphorylation inhibits RIPK1 kinase-dependent cell death in models of infection and inflammation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1729.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Research Agency (BBM, ANR, ANR-18-CE14-0022-01), INSERM, Société Francophone du Diabète (BBM, SFD, Allocation Exceptionnelle). MB was funded by the French Government (Doctoral Fellowship) and the Fondation Pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM). CL was funded by the ‘Investments for the Future’ LABEX SIGNALIFE: #ANR-11-LABX-0028-01 and #ANR-15-CE14-0016-01. LH is funded by the French Government (Doctoral Fellowship). Several partners of this work are from the Adipo-Cible Research Study Group, supported by the French government through the France 2030 investment plan managed by the ANR, as part of the Initiative of Excellence of Université Côte d’Azur under reference number ANR-15-IDEX-01. The authors acknowledge the C3M Animal, Histology (HistoC3M) and Imaging Core Facilities (Microscopy and Imaging platform Cote d’Azur, MICA), the University’s CCMA, Electron Microscopy facility (Centre Commun de Microscopie Appliquée, Université Côte d’Azur) and MICA Imaging platform Côte d’Azur supported by Université Côte d’Azur, the “Conseil Régional Sud PACA”, the “Conseil Départemental 06 “and Gis Ibisa, Alyssia Mari and Christelle Boscagli for technical help. The authors acknowledge Dr F Foufelle for helpful discussions. The graphical abstract was created using the software Bio-Render.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MB, AKC, and BBM designed the study. MB, LH, PX, CL, MJ, NV, MI, JG, FM, DR, CL, and TB performed the experiments. AKC and BBM supervised the experiments. MB, LH, PX, CL, JG, MI, SLG, SM, PG, LYC, AKC, and BBM analyzed and/or interpreted the data and/or generated the figures for the manuscript. MB and BBM wrote the manuscript, reviewed, and edited with the help of all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Boris Zhivotovsky
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Blanc, M., Habbouche, L., Xiao, P. et al. Bax Inhibitor-1 preserves pancreatic β-cell proteostasis by limiting proinsulin misfolding and programmed cell death. Cell Death Dis 15, 334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06701-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06701-x