The family of long noncoding mitochondrial RNAs (ncmtRNAs), comprising sense (SncmtRNA), and antisense (ASncmtRNA-1 and ASncmtRNA-2) members, are differentially expressed according to cell proliferative status; SncmtRNA is expressed in all proliferating cells, while ASncmtRNAs are expressed in normal proliferating cells, but is downregulated in tumor cells. ASncmtRNA knockdown with an antisense oligonucleotide induces massive apoptosis in tumor cell lines, without affecting healthy cells. Apoptotic death is preceded by proliferation blockage, suggesting that these transcripts are involved in cell cycle regulation. Here, we show that ASncmtRNA knockdown induces cell death preceded by proliferative blockage in three different human breast cancer cell lines. This effect is mediated by downregulation of the key cell cycle progression factors cyclin B1, cyclin D1, CDK1, CDK4, and survivin, the latter also constituting an essential inhibitor of apoptosis, underlying additionally the onset of apoptosis. The treatment also induces an increase in the microRNA hsa-miR-4485-3p, whose sequence maps to ASncmtRNA-2 and transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with a mimic of this miRNA induces cyclin B1 and D1 downregulation. Other miRNAs that are upregulated include nuclear-encoded hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609, whose mimics downregulate CDK1. Our results suggest that ASncmtRNA targeting blocks tumor cell proliferation through reduction of essential cell cycle proteins, mediated by mitochondrial and nuclear miRNAs. This work adds to the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms behind cell cycle arrest preceding tumor cell apoptosis induced by ASncmtRNA knockdown. As proof-of-concept, we show that in vivo knockdown of ASncmtRNAs results in drastic inhibition of tumor growth in a xenograft model of MDA-MB-231 subcutaneous tumors, further supporting this approach for the development of new therapeutic strategies against breast cancer.
Breast cancer (BrCa) is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women worldwide with a prevalent malignancy of 2,088,000 cases and about 626,000 deaths in 20181,2. A large body of experimental evidence indicates that BrCa is a well-known case of hereditary malignancy and DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification playing an important role in BrCa development3,4. In addition, BrCa is a heterogeneous disease comprising three subtypes; luminal BrCa is characterized by high expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) but not human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); or by overexpression of HER2 and low expression of ER and PR, and high expression of HER2. A third subtype of BrCa is termed triple-negative because these tumors express neither ER, PR nor HER25,6,7,8. In consequence, the response of BrCa to chemotherapeutic agents and immunotherapy is generally poor and is complicated by this heterogeneity. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of new therapeutic strategies against BrCa8,9.
Human and mouse cells express a family of mitochondrial long noncoding RNAs (ncmtRNAs), comprised of sense (SncmtRNA), and antisense (ASncmtRNAs) members, which contain inverted repeats (IR) and therefore stem-loop structures10,11,12,13,14,15. SncmtRNA is expressed in all proliferating but not in resting cells, suggesting a role for this transcript in cell proliferation10,11,12. Normal proliferating cells also express two antisense transcripts, ASncmtRNA-1 and ASncmtRNA-211,12. Remarkably, however, the ASncmtRNAs are downregulated in human and mouse tumor cell lines11,12,13,14,15. Thus, it seems that, at least in these two mammalian species, downregulation of the ASncmtRNAs is an important step in carcinogenesis and represents a new generalized pro-tumorigenic hallmark of cancer16.
ASncmtRNA knockdown (ASK for short) using chemically-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) induces apoptotic death of a wide array of human cancer cell lines from several tissue origins14. In addition, ASK also induces apoptotic death of several murine tumor cells, including the highly aggressive B16F10 melanoma12 and the renal carcinoma RenCa cell line13. Moreover, in syngeneic subcutaneous B16F10 and orthotopic RenCa models, ASK drastically inhibits tumor growth and metastasis12,13. Of note, the same results were obtained in a lentiviral-based shRNA approach in the B16F10 syngeneic murine model17, providing further proof-of-concept of the ASncmtRNAs as therapeutic targets in this cancer model. Interestingly, ASK does not affect the viability of human or murine normal cells12,13,14.
At the molecular level, ASK induces downregulation of survivin (BIRC5) in several human and mouse tumor cells12,13,14. Survivin, an essential inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein, is upregulated in virtually all human tumors18, which has inspired multiple efforts in targeting this protein for cancer therapy, with modest results19. Besides its function in apoptosis, survivin also plays a fundamental role at the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint20 and cytokinesis21, thus allowing progression through the M-phase of the cell cycle. In agreement with survivin reduction upon ASK, apoptotic death of tumor cells is preceded by a drastic inhibition of cell proliferation12,13,14,15, suggesting that this treatment induces alteration of factor(s) involved in cell cycle progression.
In this work, we show that ASK using an ASO directed to both ASncmtRNAs, Andes-1537, induces massive death of three human breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and ZR-75-1. An early proliferative blockage is also observed in all three cell lines. The strong inhibition of proliferation is explained by a reduction in the levels of the key cell cycle control proteins cyclin B1, cyclin D1, CDK1, CDK422, as well as survivin. Moreover, the treatment induces upregulation of miRNAs hsa-miR-1973, hsa-miR-4485-3p, and hsa-miR-4485-5p, which conserve 100% sequence identity to segments of the IR of ASncmtRNA-214,23. Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with a hsa-miR-4485-3p mimic induces downregulation of cyclin B1 and cyclin D1, without affecting the levels of CDK1, CDK4, or survivin. In addition, small RNAseq analysis revealed upregulation of several nuclear-encoded miRNAs. Mimics of two of these, hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609, induce reduction of CDK1. These results suggest that at least ASncmtRNA-2 plays an important function in the regulation of cell cycle progression. In addition to the effect on viability and proliferation, ASncmtRNA knockdown also induces inhibition of stemness and a drastic reduction in the invasion capacity of the three breast cancer cell lines. Translation of these results to xenografts of MDA-MB-231 cells showed a drastic delay in tumor growth in mice treated with Andes-1537, corroborating our in vitro results and further supporting a new therapeutic approach for this worldwide leading cancer in women1,2.
ASK induces proliferative arrest and apoptosis of breast cancer cell lines
Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with Andes-1537, targeted to the human ASncmtRNAs, induced knockdown of both ASncmtRNA-1 and ASncmtRNA-2, compared to non-treated control (NT) and control ASO (ASO-C)-transfected cells (Fig. 1a). As observed previously for several human and mouse tumor cells lines12,13,14,15, knockdown of ASncmtRNAs induces a drastic reduction in cell viability in comparison with both controls, at least up to 72 h post-transfection, evidenced by MTT (Fig. 1b). The extent of cell death induced by Andes-1537 was significantly higher than controls, as observed by Trypan blue (Tb) exclusion assay in MDA-MB-231 at 48 h post-transfection (Fig. 1c) and this cell death occurs through apoptosis, according to TUNEL assay (Fig. 1d, e) and Annexin V-propidium iodide (PI) double-staining (Fig. 1f, g).
In order to probe the generality of this treatment in breast cancer, we performed the same determinations on two additional cell lines representing different subtypes of breast cancer, MCF7 and ZR-75-1. Western blot analysis confirmed MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and ZR-75-1 cells as triple-negative, ER-positive and HER2-positive cell lines, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1). MTT assay showed that both MCF7 (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and ZR-75-1 (Supplementary Fig. 2b) display a drastic loss in viability up to 72 h, as observed for MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1b). Similarly, both cell lines exhibited a significantly higher death rate at 48 h post-transfection (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). Adding to its potential for cancer therapy, treatment with Andes-1537 also induced inhibition of stemness, evidenced by mammosphere formation assay (Supplementary Fig. 3) and invasive capacity of all three breast cancer cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results show the effectiveness of the treatment on all three breast cancer cell lines, regardless of the subtype.
ASK induces proliferative arrest through downregulation of key cell cycle progression factors
The time-dependent loss in viability of Andes-1537-transfected cells (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2a, b) could be attributed not solely to an increase in death rate, but also to a decrease in proliferative index. Indeed, flow cytometric cell cycle analysis at 24 h post-transfection showed a higher accumulation of Andes-1537-treated cells in S-phase, compared to controls, with a concomitant decrease in the G2/M population (Fig. 2a, b), indicative of cell cycle arrest. At the molecular level, the observed cell cycle arrest is reflected in a strong and specific downregulation of two essential cyclins at 24 h post-transfection, cyclin B1 (Fig. 2c, d) and cyclin D1 (Fig. 2c, e), while neither cyclin A1 (Fig. 2c, f) nor cyclin E1 (Fig. 2c, g) were affected. In addition, the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 (Fig. 2c, h) and CDK4 (Fig. 2c, i) were also significantly reduced. Moreover, as previously shown for other human and mouse cell lines12,13,14, the treatment also induced downregulation of survivin (Fig. 2c, j), a factor which is central not only to apoptosis, but also plays a crucial role in M-phase progression18,19,20,21.
miRNAs contained in the IR of ASncmtRNA-2 are upregulated upon ASK
We previously postulated that the molecular effects of ASK on tumor cells could be mediated by miRNAs14. Indeed, the sequences of three known miRNAs, hsa-miR-4485-5p, hsa-miR-4485-3p, and hsa-miR-1973 (which is expressed as −3p), are completely and identically contained in the IR of ASncmtRNA-223 (Fig. 3a), whereas the ASncmtRNA-1 IR does not contain any known miRNAs. As evidenced by TaqMan quantitative assays, 24 h post-transfection ASK induced an increase of 6–7 times (fold-change; FC) in the levels of hsa-miR-4485-3p and hsa-miR-1973, compared to ASO-C treatment; however, hsa-4485-5p only increased by around 30% (Fig. 3b). This result, along with the data found on miRBase (www.mirbase.org), where hsa-miR-4485-5p is much less represented than its −3p counterpart, led us to hypothesize that this mature sequence corresponds to the passenger strand of the hsa-miR-4485 duplex and was not further analyzed.
hsa-miR-4485-3p mimic induces downregulation of cyclins B1 and D1
We transfected MDA-MB-231 cells for 48 h with mimics of hsa-miR-4485-3p and hsa-miR-1973 or a control mimic. Overexpression of both miRNAs was corroborated by TaqMan assay (Fig. 4a). Both mimics induced inhibition of proliferation, albeit to a much lesser extent than Andes-1537 (Fig. 4b), evidencing a partial effect of either miRNA on its own. Total protein was extracted and subjected to Western blot (Fig. 4c). Hsa-mir-4485-3p mimic induced a significant reduction in cyclin B1 (Fig. 4c, d) and cyclin D1 (Fig. 4c, e) expression, but not of other proteins downregulated by Andes-1537 transfection, namely survivin (Fig. 4c, f), CDK1 (Fig. 4c, g) and CDK4 (Fig. 4c, h). On the other hand, hsa-miR-1973 mimic failed to induce downregulation of any of these proteins.
ASK induces upregulation of nuclear-encoded miRNAs which target CDK1
In order to explore additional miRNAs induced upon ASK which could be affecting cell cycle protein expression, we performed a preliminary small RNA sequencing analysis where, besides hsa-miR-4485-3p and hsa-miR-1973, we found several nuclear miRNAs that were significantly upregulated in Andes-1537-treated MDA-MB-231 cells, compared to ASO-C and untreated cells. Of these, two of the most upregulated were hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609, which map in sequence to chromosomes 4 and 7, respectively (www.mirbase.org). Upregulation of these miRNAs was corroborated by TaqMan assays (Fig. 5a). Using TargetScanHuman, both hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609 contain predictive canonical binding sites on the CDK1 mRNA 3’UTR, but only hsa-miR-5096 is predicted to target CDK4 (Fig. 5b). We transfected MDA-MB-231 cells with mimics of these miRNAs or control mimic, for 48 h. Overexpression of miRNAs was corroborated through TaqMan assays (Fig. 5c). Western blot showed that, indeed, both hsa-miR-3609 and hsa-miR-5095 mimics induced a significant reduction in the levels of CDK1 protein (Fig. 5d, e), but neither affected the levels of CDK4 (Fig. 5d, f), despite the extense complementarity between hsa-miR-5096 and CDK1 3’UTR (Fig. 5b). A more in-depth small RNAseq was later performed, in which we also found significant upregulation of hsa-miR-4485-3p, hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609.
Andes-1537 treatment in an MDA-MB-231 xenograft mouse model
In order to validate the use of Andes-1537 as a therapeutic tool against breast cancer, we studied the effectiveness of in vivo ASncmtRNA knockdown on tumor cell proliferation, in a xenograft assay in mice. Of the three cell lines used in this study, only MDA-MB-231 cells produced tumors in a reasonable time period (Supplementary Fig. 5). Therefore, we induced subcutaneous tumor formation in immunocompromised (NOD/SCID) Balb/c mice by inoculation of MDA-MB-231 cells. After 7 intraperitoneal (ip) injections of Andes-1537, tumor growth was drastically diminished, compared to ASO-C (Fig. 6a). We also performed a surgical assay, in which the primary tumor was resected 29 days after cell inoculation, with administration of ASOs before and after resection, simulating a therapeutic approach applied on some patients. In this assay, tumor growth was greatly reduced with Andes-1537 before, as well as after tumor resection (Fig. 6b). These results strongly suggest that ASncmtRNA knockdown inhibits tumor cell proliferation in vivo, probably mediated in part by the miRNAs described in this work.
As observed for several other human and mouse tumor cell lines12–14,17, ASK induces massive cell death in the MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 2c, d), despite belonging to different breast cancer subtypes. Cell death is preceded by an abrupt inhibition of proliferation12–15 (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Our data strongly suggest that these effects are brought about by miRNAs that are induced upon ASK14. The miRNAs whose sequences are contained in the IR of ASncmtRNA-2 are annotated on chromosome 4 (hsa-miR-1973) and 11 (hsa-miR-4485-5p and hsa-miR-4485-3p) (www.mirbase.org), respectively, but strong evidence points to their mitochondrial origin. First, the reads from our small RNAseq analyses, in addition to those on miRbase, indicate a higher proportion of mitochondrial-encoded than nuclear-encoded sequence in bases flanking these miRNAs (Supplementary Fig. 6). Furthermore, Bianchessi et al.23 showed that ASncmtRNA-2, along with hsa-miR-4485 and hsa-miR-1973 are drastically decreased upon treatment of cells with ethidium bromide, which affects mitochondrial DNA replication and transcription24, in agreement with our previous report that rhodamine 6 G, another drug that blocks mitochondrial transcription25, also inhibits expression of the ASncmtRNAs11. In addition, we reported that the ASncmtRNAs exit mitochondria to the cytosol and the nucleus26, suggesting a functional role for these transcripts outside the mitochondria where they can hypothetically be processed by Dicer, thereby generating hsa-miR-4485 and hsa-miR-1973.
Out of these putative mitochondrial miRNAs, only the hsa-miR-4485-3p mimic induced downregulation of two of the key cell cycle progression factors we analyzed in this work, specifically cyclins B1 and D1, without altering the levels of survivin, CDK1 or CDK4 (Fig. 4). However, hsa-miR-4485-3p does not have predictive binding sites on the 3’UTR of the mRNAs of either of these proteins, whereas hsa-miR-1973 contains a putative site for cyclin D1, according to the TargetScanHuman platform. As most miRNA target prediction algorithms, TargetScanHuman relies on canonical 5’ seed pairing in the 3’UTR of mRNAs, but increasing evidence shows that miRNAs can also target sequences on the 5’UTR and CDS27,28,29,30. In addition, binding is also possible at the central region and 3’ end of many miRNAs28,31,32,33. Therefore, our results could be explained by non-canonical binding of miRNAs to their targets (Supplementary Fig. S7).
ASK also induces an increase in the nuclear-encoded miRNAs hsa-miR-5096 and hsa-miR-3609 and transfection of cells with mimics of these miRNAs downregulates CDK1. This is an essential CDK, since not only does it form part of the MPF (Maturation-promoting factor, mitosis-promoting factor, or M-Phase-promoting factor) but is reported to have the capability to single-handedly drive progression through the complete cell cycle in the absence of other CDKs34,35,36. Since this is one of the most downregulated proteins upon ASK (around 6 times FC; Fig. 2c, h), it may possibly constitute a “master trigger” for the downfall of tumor cell proliferation under these conditions.
The ASncmtRNAs, as well as SncmtRNA, belong to the family of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), arbitrarily defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, which are not translated into protein37,38,39. The stem-loop structures of these transcripts are not unique since transcripts with similar structures, also containing inverted repeats, have been described in mouse oocytes40 and in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans during fasting41. Members of this largely heterogeneous family of transcripts have been shown to modulate key molecular processes in animals, such as cell differentiation and proliferation42,43. Moreover, recent studies have shown a widespread change in lncRNA expression in cancer and experimental evidence indicates that lncRNAs play essential roles in tumorigenesis and metastasis44 in different types of cancer, including breast45. Of particular interest regarding the present work are lncRNAs that are precursors of miRNAs46,47, which can function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors48, thereby controlling cell proliferation. Those findings are similar to the results reported here.
Our results show that ASK triggers an effect that alters the levels of several key cell cycle progression proteins, mediated through the induction of mitochondrial and nuclear miRNAs, which target these proteins. A proposed model for the mechanism by which ASK causes the observed molecular effects is shown in Fig. 7. Processing of ASncmtRNA-2 by RNase H results in Dicer-mediated release of the mitochondrial miRNA hsa-miR-4485 (and perhaps others), which, in combination with nuclear miRNAs that are also induced by ASK, inhibit translation of mRNAs of key cell cycle regulators. At present, the mechanism by which ASK induces upregulation of nuclear miRNAs is unknown and further studies to this end are under way.
Taken together, the present results contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the cell cycle arrest that precedes apoptotic death of tumor cells brought about by knockdown of ASncmtRNAs and sheds light on the role of this family of transcripts in cell cycle progression. This knowledge will be essential in the light of the development of a safe and effective therapeutic strategy against breast cancer based on this approach. Indeed, we observed a strong inhibition of tumor growth in murine subcutaneous xenograft assays of MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 6), correlating nicely with our in vitro results and further supporting this strategy for a breast cancer therapeutic alternative. Based on these and previous results obtained with other tumor types, we recently completed a Phase Ia Clinical Trial (NCT02508441) with Andes-1537 treatment in 16 terminal patients in San Francisco, CA. Andes-1537 was well-tolerated and two patients, one with pancreatic cancer and another with cholangiocarcinoma, maintained stable disease beyond six months after beginning of treatment49.
Materials and methods
Animal studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (Conicyt), Chile, and approved by the Ethical Committee of Fundación Ciencia & Vida. Balb/c NOD/SCID mice of 6–8 weeks of age were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained in the pathogen-free facility (Tecniplast, Buguggiate, Italy) of the Fundación Ciencia & Vida in a temperature-controlled room with a 12/12 h light/dark schedule with sterile food and water ad libitum.
Cell culture and transfection
The human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 (HTB-26), MCF7 (HTB-22), and ZR-75-1 (CRL-1500) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in a humidified cell culture chamber in RPMI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Anti-Anti (Thermo Fisher Scientific), at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cultures were routinely checked for mycoplasma contamination using the EZ-PCR Mycoplasma Test kit (Biological Industries, Cromwell, CT, USA). Cultures were not used beyond 6 months after thawing. Al experiments were performed within 2 years after purchase of cell lines. For ASO transfection experiments, cells were seeded at 50,000 cells/well in a 12-well-plate (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific). On the next day, cells were transfected with 200 nM (or 300 nM for ZR-75-1) ASO control (ASO-C: 5’-AGGTGGAGTGGATTGGGG) or Andes-1537 (5’-CACCCACCCAAGAACAGG) and 2 μg/ml Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen) or left untreated for 24 h. All ASOs contained 100% phosphorothioate internucleosidic bonds (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). For mimic transfection, cells were seeded as above and transfected the next day with 0.5 nM control or specific mimic (Exiqon, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 1 μg/ml Lipofectamine2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and left for 48 h before processing.
Total cell number and viability was determined by Trypan blue (Tb) or propidium iodide (PI) exclusion. PI was added at 50 μg/ml 1 min before flow cytometry on a BD Biosciences FACS Canto Flow Cytometer (Fundación Ciencia & Vida). For Tb, the number of viable and dead cells was determined counting at least 100 cells per sample in triplicate under an Olympus BX-53 fluorescence microscope. Relative cell number was determined using MTT Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions.
DNA fragmentation was determined by the Dead End TM Fluorometric TUNEL kit (Promega), according to manufacturer’s directions. At least ten fields per sample were analyzed under an Olympus BX-53 fluorescence microscope. Phosphatidylserine exposure was determined by Annexin-V binding with the APOtarget kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to manufacturer’s directions, co-stained with PI and analyzed by Flow cytometry on a BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA) FACS Canto Flow Cytometer.
Stemness and invasion of breast cancer cell lines
To determine stemness, Tb-negative MDA-MB-231 (2500), MCF7 (1500), and ZR-5-1 (3000) cells transfected as described above for 48 h, were suspended in MEGM medium supplemented with 25 ng/ml EGF, 5 mg/mL hydrocortisone, 5 µg/ml insulin (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), bFGF 25 ng/ml (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and seeded into 2% agarose-coated 12-well-plates. After incubation at 37 °C for 7 days, spheres >70 μm in diameter were scored. For matrigel invasion assay, 2 × 105 Tb-negative cells after a 48 h transfection were seeded over Matrigel-coated inserts (Matrigel Invasion Chamber 8.0 lm; BD Biosciences). After 24 h in culture, inserts were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and membranes were stained with DAPI, mounted in Mowiol and observed under an Olympus CKX41 microscope at ×40 magnification. At least 10 fields were evaluated.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells transfected with Andes-1537 or ASO-C or untreated for 24 h were trypsinized, collected, fixed in 75% ethanol for 24 h, washed twice in ice-cold PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in staining solution (3.8 mM sodium citrate, 0.5 μg/ml RNase A, and 50 μg/ml PI). PI-stained cells were analyzed on a BD Biosciences FACS Canto Cytometer, using the BD FACSDIVA V8.0.1 software for acquisition and the FCS Express software for cell cycle distribution.
Cells transfected with ASO or mimic were trypsinized, harvested, washed in ice-cold PBS and sedimented at 1000 × g for 10 min at RT. Pellets were suspended in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) containing 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentration was quantified using Bradford Reagent (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Proteins (30 μg/lane) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidenedifluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) on a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). Membranes were probed with antibodies against survivin (rabbit polyclonal 1:1000; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), cyclin B1 (mouse monoclonal 1:500; BD Biosciences), cyclin D1 (rabbit monoclonal 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), cyclin A1 (rabbit polyclonal 1:1000; R&D Systems), cyclin E1 (mouse monoclonal 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technologies), CDK1 (rabbit monoclonal 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technologies), CDK4 (rabbit monoclonal 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technologies), estrogen receptor (rabbit polyclonal 1:300; Cell Signaling Technologies), Her2 (rabbit polyclonal 1:500; Cell Signaling Technologies), GAPDH (mouse monoclonal 1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or β-actin (mouse monoclonal 1:2000; Abcam). Primary antibody binding was detected with peroxidase-labeled polyclonal anti-mouse (1:5000; Merck) or anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000; Merck) and revealed with the EZ-ECL system (Biological Industries) on a C-DiGit Blot Scanner (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The pixel intensity of each protein band was quantified using ImageJ software (NIH).
Conventional and quantitative RT-PCR amplification
RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s directions. To eliminate genomic and mitochondrial DNA contamination, RNA preparations were treated with TURBO DNA-free (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was assessed on an Experion Automated Electrophoresis System (Bio-Rad) and only high quality RNA was used (RQ value > 7). For conventional RT-PCR, reverse transcription was carried out with 50 ng RNA, 100 ng random hexamers, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 2 U/μl RNase-out (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 3 mM MgCl2, and 200 U Improm II reverse transcriptase (Promega) in a final volume of 20 μl. Reactions were incubated at 25 °C for 10 min, 42 °C for 50 min and 70 °C for 15 min. If not PCR-amplified immediately, cDNA was stored at −80 °C until use. PCR was carried out in 25 μl containing 2 μl cDNA, 0.5 mM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2 U GoTaq (Promega), and 1 μM each forward (for) and reverse (rev) primer in the appropriate buffer. ASncmtRNA-1 and −2 were amplified using a protocol consisting of 5 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 94 °C, 58 °C, and 72 °C for 30 s each and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Loading controls 18 S and 16 S rRNAs were amplified with the same protocol, but only for 15 and 17 cycles, respectively. The sequences of the primers used (Integrated DNA Technologies) were: 5’TAGGGATAACAGCGCAATCCTATT (forward for ASncmtRNA-1), 5’ACCGTGCAAAGGTAGCATAATCA (forward for ASncmtRNA-2 and 16 S), 5’AATAGGATTGCGCTGTTATCCCTA (reverse for 16 S), 5’CCGTAAATGATATCATCTCAACT (reverse for ASncmtRNA-1 and −2), 5’GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT (forward for 18 S), and 5’CATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG (reverse for 18 S). For quantitative RT-PCR amplification of miRNAs, cDNA was synthesized with 10 ng total RNA, using the Taqman MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to manufacturer’s guidelines. PCR was carried out using Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix II in combination with TaqMan microRNA assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to manufacturer’s directions, on a Stratagene Mx3000P real-time thermal cycler. Amplification was performed at 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min.
Cells were transfected with ASO-C, Andes-1537 for 24 h or left untreated, after which RNA was purified as described above. Total RNA quality was assessed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer using an Agilent RNA 6000 Nano chip and only samples with a RIN value > 7 were used. Small RNA libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded Small RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to manufacturer’s guidelines and sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq instrument, obtaining 5–10 million reads per sample. The second RNAseq was performed under the same conditions as above, in triplicate. Libraries were constructed using the NEBNext multiplex small RNA kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), following standard manufacturer’s protocols and sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq2000 sequencer (20–30 million reads per sample). Reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCh38 assembly) and mapped reads were quantified using miRDeep2 (v18.104.22.168)50. In order to determine the most significant miRNAs that were upregulated by ASK, but also displaying significant abundance, we first determined the fold-change (FC) by dividing the mean abundance in reads per million of Andes-1537/ASO-C and filtered out miRNAs with FC < 2. We then established the percentile of each miRNA in terms of FC and abundance and multiplied both these parameters. We chose those miRNAs that displayed a score > 0.7 and compared the results from both small RNAseq experiments, resulting in 15 miRNAs (including hsa-miR-4485-3p) that fit these conditions in both. The datasets of both RNAseq experiments have been deposited in ArrayExpress (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accessions E-MTAB-6762 (first RNAseq) and E-MTAB-6768 (second RNAseq).
Search for canonical and non-canonical binding sites
miRNA target mining was performed with TargetScanHuman 7.1 target mining software (www.targetscan.org). In order to search for putative interactions based on non-canonical binding not identified with TargetScanHuman, the complete mRNAs of cyclin B1 (CCNB1; accession NM_031966.3) and cyclin D1 (CCND1; accession BC023620.2) were aligned to the reverse complement of hsa-miR-4485-3p, using Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and the Blast algorithm (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), set to search for short sequences. Additionally, a target search was performed on the complete mRNAs of both genes, using the miRMap platform (www.mirmap.ezlab.org).
To determine the antitumor effect of Andes-1537, 11 NOD/SCID female mice 6–8 weeks of age were injected subcutaneously (sc) under anesthesia with 2.5 × 106 MDA-MB-231 cells on the right flank. When tumors reached a volume of about 100 mm3, mice were randomized into two groups of five and six animals, and received a total of 7 ip injections of 100 μl saline containing 100 μg either Andes-1537 (group of 5) or ASO-C (group of 6) on days 12, 14, 16, 19, 21, 23, and 26 post-cell inoculation, in a blinded fashion. Tumor growth was monitored with a caliper and tumor volumes were calculated following the formula: tumor volume = length × width2 × 0.5236. Mice were sacrificed under anesthesia on day 27 after cell injection.
In a second approach, 15 NOD/SCID female mice were injected also with 2.5 × 105 MDA-MB-231 cells as described above. When tumors reached about 100 mm3, mice were randomized into two groups of 10 and five mice, which received 3 ip injections of 100 μl saline containing 100 μg Andes-1537 (group of 10) or ASO-C (group of 5) on days 21, 23, and 26, in a blinded fashion. On day 29, post-cell inoculation, mice were subjected to surgery under anesthesia to remove tumors, the wound was washed with 250 μl saline containing 100 μg either Andes-1537 (group of 10 mice) or ASO-C (group of five mice) and the wound was then sutured. Afterwards, mice received seven additional ip injections of either Andes-1537 or ASO-C (same groups) as described above, on days 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, 42, and 44 post-cell inoculation. Tumor growth was determined as above and all mice were sacrificed under anesthesia on day 51.
Experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Results were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test and represent the mean ± S.E.M. Significance (P-value) was set at the nominal level of p < 0.05 or less.
Bray, F. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. who.int/gho/database/en/.
Mirza, S. et al. Expression of DNA methyltransferases in breast cancer patients and to analyze the effect of natural compounds on DNA methyltransferases and associated proteins. J. Breast Cancer. 16, 23–31 (2013).
Veeck, J. & Esteller, M. Breast cancer epigenetics: from DNA methylation to microRNAs. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 15, 5–17 (2010).
Cianfrocca, M. & Gradishar, W. New molecular classifications of breast cancer. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 59, 303–313 (2009).
Perou, C. M. Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers. Oncologist 16, 61–70 (2011).
Harbeck, N. & Gnant, M. Breast cancer. The Lancet 389, 1134–1150 (2017).
Foulkes, W. D., Smith, I. E. & Reis-Filho, J. S. Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1938–1948 (2010).
Yeo, S. K. & Guan, J. L. Breast cancer: multiple subtypes within a tumor? Trends Cancer 3, 753–760 (2017).
Villegas, J. et al. Expression of a novel non-coding mitochondrial RNA in human proliferating cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 7336–7347 (2007).
Burzio, V. A. et al. Expression of a family of noncoding mitochondrial RNAs distinguishes normal from cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9430–9434 (2009).
Lobos-González et al. Targeting antisense mitochondrial ncRNAs inhibits murine melanoma tumor growth and metastasis through reduction in survival and invasion factors. Oncotarget 7, 58331–58350 (2016).
Borgna, V. et al. Mitochondrial ASncmtRNA-1 and ASncmtRNA-2 as potent targets to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis of RenCa cells, a mouse adenocarcinoma model. Oncotarget 8, 43692–43708 (2017).
Vidaurre, S. et al. Down-regulation of the antisense mitochondrial ncRNAs is a unique vulnerability of cancer cells and a potential target for cancer therapy. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 27182–27198 (2014).
Villota, C. et al. Expression of mitochondrial ncRNAs is modulated by high-risk HPV oncogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21303–21315 (2012).
Hannahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Varas-Godoy, M. et al. In vivo knockdown of antisense non-coding mitochondrial RNAs by a lentiviral-encoded shRNA inhibits melanoma tumor growth and lung colonization. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 31, 64–72 (2018).
Altieri, D. C. Survivin - The inconvenient IAP. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 39, 91–96 (2015).
Mita, A. C., Mita, M. M., Nawrocki, T. & Giles, F. J. Survivin: key regulator of mitosis and apoptosis and novel target for cancer therapeutics. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 5000–5005 (2008).
Canovas, P. M. & Guadagno, T. M. Functional analysis of Survivin in spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Cell. Biochem. 100, 217–229 (2007).
Szafer-Glusman, E., Fuller, M. T. & Giansanti, M. G. Role of Survivin in cytokinesis revealed by a separation-of-function allele. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22, 3779–3790 (2011).
Liu, S., Dontu, G. & Wicha, M. S. Mammary stem cells, self-renewal pathways, and carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 7, 86–95 (2005).
Bianchessi, V. et al. The mitochondrial lncRNA ASncmtRNA-2 is induced in aging and replicative senescence in Endothelial Cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 81, 62–70 (2015).
King, M. P. & Attardi, G. Human cells lacking mtDNA: repopulation with exogenous mitochondria by complementation. Science 246, 500–503 (1989).
Felty, Q., Singh, K. P. & Roy, D. Estrogen-induced G1/S transition of G0-arrested estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells is regulated by mitochondrial oxidant signaling. Oncogene 24, 4883–4893 (2005).
Landerer, E. et al. Nuclear localization of the mitochondrial ncRNAs in normal and cancer cells. Cell. Oncol. (Dordr). 34, 297–305 (2011).
Lytle, J. R., Yario, T. A. & Steitz, J. A. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9667–9672 (2007).
Lee, I. et al. New class of microRNA targets containing simultaneous 5’-UTR and 3’-UTR interaction sites. Genome Res. 19, 1175–1183 (2009).
Hausser, J., Syed, A. P., Bilen, B. & Zavolan, M. Analysis of CDS-located miRNA target sites suggests that they can effectively inhibit translation. Genome Res. 23, 604–615 (2013).
Brümmer, A. & Hausser, J. MicroRNA binding sites in the coding region of mRNAs: extending the repertoire of post-transcriptional gene regulation. Bioessays 36, 617–626 (2014).
Shin, C. et al. Expanding the microRNA targeting code: functional sites with centered pairing. Mol. Cell 38, 789–802 (2010).
Martin, H. C. et al. Imperfect centered miRNA binding sites are common and can mediate repression of target mRNAs. Genome Biol. 15, R51 (2014).
Cloonan, N. Re-thinking miRNA-mRNA interactions: intertwining issues confound target discovery. Bioessays 37, 379–388 (2015).
Hochegger, H. et al. An essential role for Cdk1 in S phase control is revealed via chemical genetics in vertebrate cells. J. Cell Biol. 178, 257–268 (2007).
Hochegger, H., Takeda, S. & Hunt, T. Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: does one fit all? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 910–916 (2008).
Santamaría, D. et al. Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature 448, 811–815 (2007).
St Laurent, G., Wahlestedt, C. & Kapranov, P. The Landscape of long non-coding RNA classification. Trends Genet. 31, 239–251 (2015).
Zhu, S. et al. Genome-scale deletion screening of human long non-coding RNAs using a paired-guide RNA CRISPR-Cas9 library. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1279–1286 (2016).
Quinn, J. J. & Chang, H. Y. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 47–62 (2016).
Watanabe, T. et al. Endogenous siRNAs from naturally formed dsRNAs regulate transcripts in mouse oocytes. Nature 453, 539–543 (2008).
Hellwig, S. & Bass, B. L. A starvation-induced noncoding RNA modulates expression of Dicer-regulated genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12897–12902 (2008).
Hu, W., Alvarez-Dominguez, J. R. & Lodish, H. F. Regulation of mammalian cell differentiation by long non-coding RNAs. EMBO Rep. 13, 971–983 (2012).
Kondo, Y., Shinjo, K. & Katsushima, K. Long non-coding RNAs as an epigenetic regulator in human cancers. Cancer Sci. 108, 1927–1933 (2017).
Schmitt, A. M. & Chang, H. Y. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer pathways. Cancer Cell 29, 452–463 (2016).
Liu, B. et al. A cytoplasmic NF-κB interacting long noncoding RNA blocks IκB phosphorylation and suppresses breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Cell 27, 370–381 (2015).
Cai, X. & Cullen, B. R. The imprinted H19 ncRNA is a primary microRNA precursor. RNA 13, 313–316 (2007).
Keniry, A. et al. The H19 lincRNA is a developmental reservoir of miR-675 that suppresses growth and Igf1r. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 659–665 (2012).
Svoronos, A. A., Engelman, D. M. & Slack, F. J. OncomiR or tumor suppressor? the duplicity of microRNAs in cancer. Cancer Res. 76, 3666–3670 (2016).
Dhawan, M. S. et al. Phase 1 study of ANDES-1537: a novel antisense oligonucleotide against non-coding mitochondrial DNA in advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 2557 (2018).
Friedländer, M. R., Mackowiak, S. D., Li, N., Chen, W. & Rajewsky, N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 37–52 (2012).
The authors wish to thank María José Fuenzalida from the Cytometry Facility at Fundación Ciencia & Vida, for her support and expertise in flow cytometry experiments. We also thank Dr. Pablo D.T. Valenzuela from Fundación Ciencia & Vida for his continuous support. This work was supported by the “Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), Chile [grants Fondecyt-1140345, Fondecyt-3140414, CCTE-PFB16, and AFB 170004].
Conflict of interest
L.O.B. holds ownership of equity of Andes Biotechnologies. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by M. Piacentini