MYC-induced nuclear antigen (MINA53) is a JmjC (jumonji C domain)-containing protein, which is highly expressed in many cancers including glioblastoma. We have revealed in our previous report that MINA53 is a poor prognostic indicator for glioblastoma patients, and knockdown of MINA53 could reduce glioblastoma malignancy. In this study, we found that MINA53 knockdown could decrease the DNA replication initiation in glioblastoma cells. Through further investigations, we revealed that MINA53 could regulate the expression of the CDC45-MCM-GINS (CMG) complex genes, which are vital for DNA replication initiation. Knockdown of MINA53 reduced the CMG genes expression and thus induced DNA replication stress and DNA damage. Furthermore, MINA53 knockdown diminished DNA damage response (DDR) by reducing the ATM/ATR-H2AX pathway activity and finally led glioblastoma cells to apoptosis and death. We further applied a genotoxic drug Doxorubicin and found that MINA53 deficiency sensitized glioblastoma cells to Doxorubicin. Our study reveals that MINA53 is involved in DNA replication initiation and DNA damage response, and provides support for MINA53 as a novel and potential therapeutic target for glioblastoma treatment.
MYC-induced nuclear antigen (MINA531, also known as Mdig2, NO523, RIOX2) is a JmjC (jumonji C domain)-containing protein which is highly expressed in many cancers, such as pancreatic cancer4, gastric adenocarcinoma5, lung cancer6,7, lymph cancer8, colon cancer9, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma10, neuroblastoma11, and cholangiocarcinoma12. In our previous report, we demonstrated that MINA53 is upregulated in glioblastoma and is a poor prognostic indicator; Knockdown of MINA53 significantly inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, which suggests that MINA53 could be a potential molecular target for glioblastoma therapy13.
DNA replication is a conserved cellular process which occurs exactly only once during cell-cycle progression for its initiation is tightly regulated14. The initiation of DNA replication can be divided into two steps: origin licensing and origin firing15. Origin licensing is the primary step which occurs in G1 phase. In this step, minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM) complex is recruited onto the origin DNA sequence to form DNA helicase14,16,17,18. In the process of origin firing, it is essential for DNA helicase to unwind double-stranded DNA at the replication fork. While the activation of DNA helicase depends on the stable association of MCM complex with cell division cycle 45 (CDC45) as well as Go-Ichi-Ni-San (GINS) complex to form the CDC45-MCM-GINS (CMG) complex19. The CMG complex is assembled by CDC45, MCM2~7 and GINS1~4, and each of these components is vital for the function of the complex20. The formation of CMG is indispensable for DNA replication initiation. Deficiency in one or more CMG genes would inhibit DNA replication initiation21,22,23.
Defective DNA replication initiation leads to under-replicated DNA and induces DNA replication stress and DNA damage24,25. Cells response to DNA damage by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, which can decide cell fate by driving the correctly DNA-repaired cell to survival or the cell failing to repair its DNA to death26. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) or ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) kinases are the key elements in DDR pathway, which can be recruited to the damage site and auto-phosphorylated. Then they phosphorylate and activate the essential downstream factor histone variant H2AX, producing γ-H2AX27,28. γ-H2AX is required for the assembly of DNA repair proteins at the DNA damage site29.
In this study, we established the functional relevance between MINA53 and DNA replication. We found that knockdown of MINA53 resulted in a decrease of CMG genes expression as well as an upregulation of H3K9me3 at CMG genes promoters. Less expression of CMG led to insufficient DNA replication initiation, and thus caused DNA damage. Furthermore, MINA53 knockdown inhibited the activation of ATM/ATR-H2AX pathway which has a key role in DNA damage response. The accumulating DNA damage and diminished DDR finally led glioblastoma cells to apoptosis and death. According to this, we further applied a broad-spectrum anti-tumor drug Doxorubicin and found that MINA53 knockdown sensitized glioblastoma cells to Doxorubicin, suggesting that MINA53 could be a potential therapy target for glioblastoma.
Materials and methods
Glioblastoma cell lines LN-229 and U-87 MG and human embryonic renal cell line 293FT were purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (P/S). 293FT growth medium contains extra 0.5 mg/mL G418, 4 mM l-glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (MEM), and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. The 293FT transfection medium do not consist P/S and G418. All cell lines were tested mycoplasma-negative and cultured in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The DMEM media, FBS, antibiotics, and supplements were purchased from Thermo Fisher (IL, USA).
Transfection and infection
Lentiviral constructs expressing MINA53 short hairpin (sh) RNA (#1, TRCN0000130530; #2, TRCN0000291230) and the negative control non-mammalian plasmid (Control) (SHC002) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). The lentivirus was generated following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, pLKO.1-shMINA53#1 or pLKO.1-shMINA53#2 vector, pLP1, pLP2 and pLP/VSVG plasmids were co-transfected into 293FT cells using lipofecterminTM2000. Viral supernatants were collected and clarified by filtration 48 h later. The lentivirus was used immediately or stored at −80 °C in small aliquots. Target cells were infected by lentivirus twice and then selected by puromycin (A1113802, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) to gain the stable cell line.
Cells were seeded on coverslips, and incubated with 25 μM BrdU (B5002, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for 40 min, then washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min. Subsequently, cells were treated with 1 M HCl and blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h, and then incubated with BrdU antibody (ab6326, Abcam, MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C followed by Alexa FluorR 488 goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibody (H + L) (A-11006, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) for 2 h at 25 °C. Nuclear was stained with 300 nM 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (C1005, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 15 min at 25 °C. The percentage of BrdU-positive cells was calculated and 6 microscopic fields were counted (Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
DNA fiber assay
Overall, 2 × 103 cells were seeded as a drop near the edge of one 100 mm plate and cultured overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified incubator. The next day the cells were pulse-labeled with 25 μM iododeoxyuridine (IdU) (I7125, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and 250 μM thymidine analog chlorodeoxyuridine (CldU) (C6891, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for 15 min each. Then the medium was removed and cells were dried to sticky. When the cells were about to dry, they were overlaid with 20 μL lysis buffer (1 M Tris pH 7.4, 0.5 M EDTA, 10% SDS) for 10 min at 25 °C. Then the plate was tilted at 25° angle to let the buffer run to the bottom end of the plate so as to spread the DNA into fiber. The DNA fiber was air-dried and fixed in the solution with methanol: acetic acid as 3:1 for 10 min, then treated with freshly prepared 2.5 M HCl for 80 min at 25 °C. After that, the DNA fiber was blocked in 5% BSA in PBS for 30 min and then incubated with rat BrdU antibody (ab6326, Abcam, MA, USA) and mouse IdU antibody (ab181664, Abcam, MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with Alexa FluorR 594 goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (H + L) (A-11032, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) and Alexa FluorR 488 goat anti-rat IgG antibody (H + L) (A-11006, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) for 2 h at 25 °C. Images were acquired by Nikon (Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The distance between active replication forks were measured using the ImageJ software.
Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed and proteins were extracted. Then the proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked with 5% defatted milk, and incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C followed by the secondly antibodies at for 2 h 25 °C. The ECL SuperSignal West Femto kit (34096, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) was used for visualization. The MINA53 antibody (397300, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA), γ-H2AX antibody (#9718), p-ATR antibody (#2853), p-ATM antibody (#5883), Cleaved-Caspase 3 antibody (#9664), and Cleaved-PARP antibody (#5625) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (MA, USA). The H2AX antibody (ab124781), ATR antibody (ab2905), ATM antibody (ab32420) were purchased from Abcam (MA, USA). The GAPDH antibody (AF0006) was purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-quantitative PCR (qPCR) (ChIP-qPCR)
ChIP assays were conducted using the EZ-ChIPTM kit (17–371, Millipore, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after sheared by sonication, the 200–1000 bps DNA fragments were immunoprecipitaed by MINA53 antibody (397300, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) or H3K9me3 antibody (ab113754, Abcam, MA, USA), and then reverse cross-linked and purified. qPCR was conducted subsequently to determine the enrichment flod. The primer sequences used are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Cells were collected, embedded in a thin agarose gel on a microscope slide at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL and incubated with cell lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 1% Triton and 10% DMSO) at for 2 h 4 °C, then pre-treated with electrophoresis buffer (0.3 M NaOH, 1 mM Na2EDTA) at for 15 min 25 °C to unwind the DNA. Electrophoresis was performed at 25 V, 300 mA for 20 min. Subsequently the DNA was incubated with 0.4 M Tris-HCl (pH = 7.5) at for 15 min 25 °C, and stained in ethidium bromide (EB) buffer for 20 min. Images were acquired by Nikon (Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Cells were cultured on coverslips and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min. Subsequently, the cells were blocked with 10% goat serum with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at 25 °C, and then incubated with γ-H2AX antibody (#9718, Cell Signaling Technologies, MA, USA) overnight at 4 °C followed by Alexa FluorR 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (H + L) (A-11034, Thermo Fisher, IL, USA) for 2 h at 25 °C. Nuclear was stained with 300 nM DAPI (C1005, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 15 min at 25 °C. The percentage of γ-H2AX-positive cells was calculated and 6 microscopic fields were counted (Nikon 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Trypan blue staining
Trypan blue working solution (C0011, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was added to the cell suspension (2 × 106 cells/mL) as a proportion of 1:1. After mixed uniformly, the cells stained or not were counted using a hemocytometer.
Flow cytometric apoptosis assays
The experiments were performed with an Annexin-V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (C1063, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were collected and washed with PBS, gently resuspended in the 1 × binding buffer and incubated with Annexin-V-FITC/PI. An Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD, NJ, USA) was applied to analyze the data following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Experiments were carried out in 3 or more technical and biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed as previously described13. Statistical parameters are specified in the figure legends. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m., and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Downregulation of MINA53 decreases DNA replication initiation in glioblastoma cells
In our previous report, we found that knockdown of MINA53 resulted in glioblastoma cell cycle arrest in G1 phase, suggesting a potential function of MINA53 in DNA replication13. To explore further of this, we established four stable MINA53-knockdown glioblastoma cell lines (LN-229 shMINA53#1, LN-229 shMINA53#2, U-87 MG shMINA53#1, and U-87 MG shMINA53#2) and performed a BrdU incorporation assay. We found that the percentage of BrdU-positive cells were significantly decreased in the MINA53-knockdown groups in comparison with the control groups both in LN-229 and U-87 MG cell lines (Fig. 1a, b). Next, to investigate whether MINA53 knockdown caused a direct hindrance in the execution of the DNA replication program, we quantified the number of the replication foci which correlates with the number of active replication clusters30. Cells were incubated with the CldU for 15 min and fixed, and then CldU was detected by immunostaining. We quantified the number of CldU foci per cell and found that the MINA53-knockdown groups displayed lower number of replication foci (CldU foci) than the control groups in both LN-229 and U-87 MG cell lines (Fig. 1c, d). Besides, we also performed a DNA fiber analysis to measure the distance between adjacent active replication forks within the replication clusters. Cells were sequentially incubated with IdU and CldU for 15 min each and DNA fibers were spread out. IdU and CldU were detected by immunostaining using specific antibodies. The distance between adjacent active replication forks was calculated (Fig. 1e). And we found that the MINA53-knockdown cells exhibited an average increase on the distance between adjacent active replication forks (Fig. 1f). These results suggested that knockdown of MINA53 decreases DNA replication initiation.
MINA53 deficiency inhibits the CMG complex genes expression
To further investigate how MINA53 expression is linked to DNA replication initiation, we examined our microarray data13 and found that the expression of a set of genes (CDC45, MCM2~ 7, GINS1~ 4) encoding the proteins of the CMG complex were significantly down-regulated after knockdown of MINA53 (Fig. 2a). qRT-PCR analysis further confirmed the results (Fig. 2b, c). We also examined the protein levels of some CMG complex proteins (CDC45L, MCM2, MCM3 and MCM5) using western blot analysis and found that they were consistently down-regulated (Supplementary Fig.S1). The CMG complex is a conserved component of the DNA replication system and is indispensable for the DNA replication initiation21,31. Deficiency in one or more CMG complex genes would inhibits DNA replication21,22,23. Our data showed that MINA53 deficiency inhibited the expression of the CMG complex genes, suggesting that MINA53 may correlate with DNA replication through altering the expression of the CMG complex.
MINA53 knockdown increases H3K9me3 level at CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, and MCM5 promoters
Changes in the expression of MINA53 is usually accompanied with H3K9me3 alteration13,32. According to this, we performed a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay to determine whether the downregulation of CMG genes was associated with H3K9me3 alteration. As shown in Fig. 2d, we found a high enrichment of MINA53 in the promoter region of CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, and MCM5. In addition, after knockdown of MINA53, a significant increase of H3K9me3 level was detected in their promoter region where MINA53 was enriched (Fig. 2e). Tri-methylation on H3K9 tends to suppress gene transcription33. Our data show that knockdown of MINA53 increased the level of H3K9me3 on CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, and MCM5 promoters and thus decreased their expression in vitro.
MINA53 deficiency induces DNA damage and reduces the activity of the ATM/ATR-H2AX pathway
Cells that have deficiency in DNA replication initiation are easy to accumulate DNA lesion14,22,25,34,35. We further investigated whether the DNA replication initiation decrease caused by MINA53 knockdown would lead to DNA damage. We performed a comet assay, a technique to measure DNA damage in an individual cell using single-cell gel electrophoresis. We collected the cells 5 days after MINA53 knockdown, embedded them in a thin agarose gel on a microscope slide and then carried out the electrophoresis analysis. We observed a great amount of tail DNA in the MINA53-knockdown groups but bare in the control groups (Fig. 3a, b), indicating that knockdown of MINA53-induced DNA damage in glioblastoma cells. The histone H2AX will be phosphorylated as a key signal for DNA damage response36, which is required for the assembly of DNA repair proteins at the sites containing damaged chromatin29. Hence, we further examined the H2AX phosphorylation status in glioblastoma cells after MINA53 knockdown using immunofluorescence. Interestingly, we found that the percentage of phospho-Serine 139 H2AX (γ-H2AX)-positive cells did not change much in the MINA53-knockdown groups compared to the control groups (Fig. 3c, d). Western blot analysis also demonstrated that γ-H2AX did not increase after knockdown of MINA53 (Fig. 3e). H2AX can be phosphorylated by ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase or ATM-Rad3-related (ATR) kinase after they are activated by autophosphorylation in the DDR pathway27,37,38. Therefore, we detected the status of ATM and ATR kinases by western blot to investigate why the γ-H2AX did not increase when cells were suffering from DNA damage induced by knockdown of MINA53. We found that both ATM and ATR as well as their active form p-ATM and p-ATR were reduced significantly after MINA53 knockdown (Fig. 3e). These data demonstrated that knockdown of MINA53 reduced the expression and activity of ATM and ATR kinases and thus inhibited the H2AX to be phosphorylated, suggesting that MINA53 knockdown inhibits the ATM/ATR-H2AX pathway and thus diminishes DNA damage response in glioblastoma cells.
Knockdown of MINA53 induces glioblastoma cell apoptosis
Suffering from DNA damage and diminished DDR is a great challenge to cell survival. We then explored whether knockdown of MINA53 would lead glioblastoma cell to die. We tracked the cells condition after knocking down MINA53, and found that 5–6 days later cells with MINA53 knockdown floated gradually, whereas the control cells did not. Subsequently we collected the cells and analyzed them using trypan blue staining and flow cytometry assay, respectively. Dead cells were stained with trypan blue and counted as well as the living cells. As shown in Fig. 4a, the MINA53-knockdown groups showed a greater proportion of dead cells than the control groups. In addition, we stained the cells with annexin-V-FITC and PI and then analyzed them with flow cytometry. The results showed that the number of apoptosis cells in the MINA53-knockdown groups increased significantly compared with the control groups (Fig. 4b, c). Moreover, we did a western blot analysis and found that Caspase 3 (a critical executioner of apoptosis) was activated (cleaved) and PARP (one of the main cleavage targets of Caspase 3) was cleaved after MINA53 was knocked down (Fig. 4d). These together with the above data suggested that knockdown of MINA53 in glioblastoma cells induces cell death through DNA damage-associated cell apoptosis.
MINA53 deficiency sensitizes glioblastoma cells to Doxorubicin
DDR insufficiency makes cells sensitive to DNA damage. To further illuminate the relationship between MINA53 and glioblastoma cell DNA damage and cell death, we applied a DNA damage-inducing agent Doxorubicin (an efficient DSB inducing chemotherapy medication widely used in cancer) to study whether MINA53 deficiency would sensitize glioblastoma cell to it. In consistent with our previous report, 2 days after we knocked down MINA53 in glioblastoma cells the expression of MINA53 was efficiently down-regulated13. Considering that cell apoptosis was induced 5 days after MINA53 was knocked down, to avoid the following experiments being affected by the knockdown itself, we did the drug study 2–4 days after knockdown of MINA53. Cells were treated with Doxorubicin in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner, and then the percentage of dead cells was counted by trypan blue staining. As shown in Fig. 5a, after treated with Doxorubicin, the MINA53-knockdown groups exhibited a much greater proportion of dead cells than the control groups, indicating that knockdown of MINA53 sensitized glioblastoma cells to Doxorubicin. Moreover, we examined the DNA damage status in the cells treated with Doxorubicin using comet assay, and observed more tail DNA in the MINA53-knockdown groups than the control groups (Fig. 5b), indicating that Doxorubicin induced more DNA damage in the MINA53-knockdown groups. We further checked the H2AX status and found that in each concentration Doxorubicin failed to increase the γ-H2AX level in the MINA53-knockdown cells, and the MINA53-knockdown cells exhibited a much higher level of Cleaved-Caspase 3 and Cleaved-PARP in comparison with the corresponding control cells (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, we conducted a flow cytometry apoptosis analysis and found that Doxorubicin induced more apoptotic cells in the MINA53-knockdown groups than their corresponding control groups (Fig. 5d, e). These results were consistent with our results above (Figs. 3e and 4d) and further demonstrated that knockdown of MINA53 sensitized glioblastoma cells to Doxorubicin; after treated with Doxorubicin, glioblastoma cells with MINA53 knocked down suffered severer DNA damage and diminished DDR and ultimately died through cell apoptosis.
DNA helicase is activated when the CMG complex is formed, which unwinds double-stranded DNA at the replication fork and is essential for the initiation of DNA replication39,40,41. Deficiency in one or more CMG genes would inhibit DNA replication initiation21,22,23, and insufficiency of DNA replication would cause DNA replication stress and DNA damage24,25. MINA53 is reported to show physical interaction with several DNA replication proteins (MCM7, MCM5, ORC5)42, which indicates that MINA53 may have a role in DNA replication. In this study, we provide evidence for the first time that MINA53 could regulate the expression of the CMG genes. Knockdown of MINA53 reduced the expression of CDC45, MCM2~7 and GINS1~4 genes (Fig. 2). And the reduction of the CMG genes resulted in the defective DNA replication initiation (Fig. 1) which contributed to the generation of DNA damage (Fig. 3a, b). Moreover, we found that MINA53 could bind to the promoter regions of several CMG genes CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, and MCM5. Knockdown of MINA53 would increase the H3K9me3 methylation level on these gene promoters. However, no effective enrichment of MINA53 was found on the promoters of other CMG genes (data not shown), indicating that MINA53 might affect the CMG genes expression through a more complicated way which needs to be further investigated. Overexpression of the CMG proteins have been observed in several malignancies43,44,45. Many studies demonstrate that downregulation of the CMG genes can have anti-cancer effect22,25,34,46,47. MINA53 deficiency would reduce the expression of the CMG genes, which gives inspiration that MINA53 could work as a molecular target for anti-cancer therapy.
Cells response to DNA damage by activating the DDR pathway, which can promote the correctly DNA-repaired cell to survive or the cell failing to repair its DNA to die26. In recent years, it has been well demonstrated that deficiency in DDR regulating genes is involved in tumorigenesis and cancer development. Defect of one or more DDR pathways during malignancy genesis trends to trigger DDR dependencies. Targeted therapies based on inhibiting the DDR in cancers offer a new strategy to fight against drug resistance48.
Wang et al provided evidence for the contribution of MINA53 to DDR. They showed an enhanced ATM phosphorylation by overexpressing MINA53 and a reduced ATM phosphorylation by down-regulating MINA53 in lung cancer cells treated with phleomycin42. In our study, we found that knockdown of MINA53 decreased not only the expression of ATM and ATR but also their phosphorylation pattern in glioblastoma cells. p-ATM and p-ATR are the active forms of ATM and ATR, which can phosphorylate H2AX to mediate the DDR. These could be a reason why we did not observe γ-H2AX upregulation after treated with Doxorubicin in MINA53 knockdown cells (Fig. 3–e).
Doxorubicin is widely used in cancer treatment as a chemotherapy genotoxic drug49. However, Doxorubicin is not commonly used in clinical glioma chemotherapy regimens due to it is less capable to pass through the blood–brain barrier. Nevertheless, development in interstitial chemotherapy makes it possible to deliver drugs directly at the site of brain tumor50, which provides more therapeutic options for patients who are suffering from brain tumor. Our study shows that knockdown of MINA53 sensitized glioblastoma cells to the genotoxic drug Doxorubicin, which gives more support for gene and drug combination therapeutics and may help to further improve the efficacy of glioblastoma interstitial chemotherapy.
c-Myc is a proto-oncogene that is usually implicated in glioblastoma. c-Myc can directly promote the proliferation of cancer cells, regulate the histone methylation, DDR, and DNA replication51,52,53. MINA53 is discovered as a Myc-induced nuclear antigen, and is directly regulated by c-Myc1. Researches reveal that MINA53 is over-expressed in many types of cancers4,6,8,9,11,12,13,54,55, and repressing MINA53 expression can efficiently suppress cancer cell proliferation. Besides, there are studies showing that MINA53 is involved in histone methylation2,6,13,32. Our results together with those previous studies give us a hint that MINA53 may be one of the important downstream genes of c-Myc, which has a significant role in regulation of cell proliferation, histone modification, DDR, and DNA replication.
Our data show that knockdown of MINA53 increased the level of H3K9me3 on several CMG gene promoters and thus decreased their expression in vitro. To further evaluate the relationship of MINA53 and CMG genes in vivo, we analyzed their expression level in two TCGA clinical databases: Glioblastoma (Cell 2013)56 and Brain low grade glioma (http://www.cbioportal.org/index.do). We compared the mRNA level of MINA53 in the two databases and found that MINA53 tend to have a higher mRNA expression in GBM than in low grade glioma. CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, MCM5 and ATR also have the same tendency, except for ATM (P = 0.34) (supplemental data 2). We also performed a linear regression analysis to see the relevancy of MINA53 expression with CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, MCM5, ATM, and ATR expression. We found a positive correlation between the mRNA level of MCM2 (R2 = 0.027, P = 0.039), MCM3 (R2 = 0.04, P = 0.01), ATM (R2 = 0.19, P < 0.0001), ATR (R2 = 0.26, P < 0.0001), and the mRNA level of MINA53, respectively. The mRNA level of MCM5 (R2 = 0.0004, P = 0.8) and CDC45 (R2 = 0.0001, P = 0.89) has no obvious correlation with the mRNA level of MINA53 (supplemental data 3). These data are to some extent consistent with our in vitro data. In vivo environment is much more complex than in vitro, the expression of CDC45, MCM2, MCM3, MCM5, ATM, and ATR may not only be affected by MINA53, but also altered by other regulating factors.
In summary, our study demonstrates that MINA53 is involved in DNA replication regulation and DNA damage response. Knockdown of MINA53 in glioblastoma cells downregulates the expression of the CMG genes and thus induces DNA replication stress. MINA53 knockdown further inhibits DNA damage response by reducing the ATM/ATR-H2AX pathway activity and leads glioblastoma cells to apoptosis and death (Fig. 6). And meaningfully, MINA53 deficiency could make glioblastoma cells more sensitive to Doxorubicin. These findings reveal the role of MINA53 in DNA replication and DNA damage response and suggest MINA53 as a novel and promising molecular target for glioblastoma therapy.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by M. Malewicz
Tsuneoka, M., Koda, Y., Soejima, M., Teye, K. & Kimura, H. A novel myc target gene, mina53, that is involved in cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35450–35459 (2002).
Zhang, Y. et al. The Human mineral dust-induced gene, mdig, is a cell growth regulating gene associated with lung cancer. Oncogene 24, 4873–4882 (2005).
Eilbracht, J., Kneissel, S., Hofmann, A. & Schmidt-Zachmann, M. S. Protein NO52—a constitutive nucleolar component sharing high sequence homologies to protein NO66. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 84, 279–294 (2005).
Tan, X. P. et al. Potential effects of Mina53 on tumor growth in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 69, 619–625 (2014).
Xing, J., Wang, K., Liu, P. W., Miao, Q. & Chen, X. Y. Mina53, a novel molecular marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 31, 634–640 (2014).
Lu, Y. et al. Lung cancer-associated JmjC domain protein mdig suppresses formation of tri-methyl lysine 9 of histone H3. Cell Cycle 8, 2101–2109 (2009).
Komiya, K. et al. Expression of Mina53, a novel c-Myc target gene, is a favorable prognostic marker in early stage lung cancer. Lung Cancer 69, 232–238 (2010).
Teye, K. et al. Expression of Myc target gene mina53 in subtypes of human lymphoma. Oncol. Rep. 18, 841–848 (2007).
Teye, K. et al. Increased expression of a Myc target gene Mina53 in human colon cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 164, 205–216 (2004).
Tsuneoka, M. et al. Mina53 as a potential prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 7347–7356 (2004).
Fukahori, S. et al. Immunohistochemical expressions of Cap43 and Mina53 proteins in neuroblastoma. J. Pediatr. Surg. 42, 1831–1840 (2007).
Tan, X. P., Zhang, Q., Dong, W. G., Lei, X. W. & Yang, Z. R. Upregulated expression of Mina53 in cholangiocarcinoma and its clinical significance. Oncol. Lett. 3, 1037–1041 (2012).
Huang, M. Y., Xuan, F., Liu, W. & Cui, H. J. MINA controls proliferation and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma by epigenetically regulating cyclins and CDKs via H3K9me3 demethylation. Oncogene 36, 387–396 (2017).
Gaillard, H., Garcia-Muse, T. & Aguilera, A. Replication stress and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 276–289 (2015).
Aguilera, A. & Garcia-Muse, T. Causes of genome instability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 1–32 (2013).
Bell, S. P. & Stillman, B. ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357, 128–134 (1992).
Diffley, J. F., Cocker, J. H., Dowell, S. J. & Rowley, A. Two steps in the assembly of complexes at yeast replication origins in vivo. Cell 78, 303–316 (1994).
Diffley, J. F. Eukaryotic DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 368–372 (1994).
Boos, D., Frigola, J. & Diffley, J. F. Activation of the replicative DNA helicase: breaking up is hard to do. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 423–430 (2012).
Aves, S. J., Liu, Y. & Richards, T. A. Evolutionary diversification of eukaryotic DNA replication machinery. Subcell. Biochem. 62, 19–35 (2012).
Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V. & Kelman, Z. The CMG (CDC45/RecJ, MCM, GINS) complex is a conserved component of the DNA replication system in all archaea and eukaryotes. Biol. Direct 7, 7 (2012).
Aparicio, T., Guillou, E., Coloma, J., Montoya, G. & Mendez, J. The human GINS complex associates with Cdc45 and MCM and is essential for DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 2087–2095 (2009).
Guo, W. et al. Juvenile hormone-receptor complex acts on mcm4 and mcm7 to promote polyploidy and vitellogenesis in the migratory locust. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004702 (2014).
Ekholm-Reed, S. et al. Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 165, 789–800 (2004).
Ibarra, A., Schwob, E. & Mendez, J. Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8956–8961 (2008).
Roos, W. P., Thomas, A. D. & Kaina, B. DNA damage and the balance between survival and death in cancer biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 20–33 (2016).
Burma, S., Chen, B. P., Murphy, M., Kurimasa, A. & Chen, D. J. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42462–42467 (2001).
Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548 (2003).
Podhorecka, M., Skladanowski, A., & Bozko, P. H2AX phosphorylation: its role in DNA damage response and cancer therapy. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 920161 (2010).
Jackson, D. A. & Pombo, A. Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. J. Cell. Biol. 140, 1285–1295 (1998).
Dowell, S. J., Romanowski, P. & Diffley, J. F. Interaction of Dbf4, the Cdc7 protein kinase regulatory subunit, with yeast replication origins in vivo. Science 265, 1243–1246 (1994).
Chen, B. et al. Mdig de-represses H19 large intergenic non-coding RNA (lincRNA) by down-regulating H3K9me3 and heterochromatin. Oncotarget 4, 1427–1437 (2013).
Lin, H. et al. Coordinated regulation of active and repressive histone methylations by a dual-specificity histone demethylase ceKDM7A from Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Res. 20, 899–907 (2010).
Tian, L., Liu, J., Xia, G. H. & Chen, B. A. RNAi-mediated knockdown of MCM7 gene on CML cells and its therapeutic potential for leukemia. Med. Oncol. 34, 21 (2017).
Debatisse, M., Le Tallec, B., Letessier, A., Dutrillaux, B. & Brison, O. Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited. Trends Genet. 28, 22–32 (2012).
Kuo, L. J. & Yang, L. X. Gamma-H2AX—a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. Vivo 22, 305–309 (2008).
Bester, A. C. et al. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435–446 (2011).
Bartek, J., Lukas, J. & Bartkova, J. DNA damage response as an anti-cancer barrier: damage threshold and the concept of ‘conditional haploinsufficiency’. Cell Cycle 6, 2344–2347 (2007).
Bochman, M. L. & Schwacha, A. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol. Cell 31, 287–293 (2008).
Lee, J. K. & Hurwitz, J. Isolation and characterization of various complexes of the minichromosome maintenance proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18871–18878 (2000).
Ishimi, Y. A. DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24508–24513 (1997).
Wang, W. et al. The proteomic investigation reveals interaction of mdig protein with the machinery of DNA double-strand break repair. Oncotarget 6, 28269–28281 (2015).
Pollok, S., Bauerschmidt, C., Sanger, J., Nasheuer, H. P. & Grosse, F. Human Cdc45 is a proliferation-associated antigen. Febs. J. 274, 3669–3684 (2007).
Saydam, O. et al. Comparative protein profiling reveals minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins as novel potential tumor markers for meningiomas. J. Proteome Res. 9, 485–494 (2010).
Ouyang, F. et al. GINS2 is a novel prognostic biomarker and promotes tumor progression in early-stage cervical cancer. Oncol. Rep. 37, 2652–2662 (2017).
Erkan, E. P. et al. Depletion of minichromosome maintenance protein 7 inhibits glioblastoma multiforme tumor growth in vivo. Oncogene 33, 4778–4785 (2014).
Sun, J. et al. Cell division cycle 45 promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression via regulating cell cycle. Tumour Biol. 39, 1010428317705342 (2017).
O’Connor, M. J. Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Mol. Cell 60, 547–560 (2015).
Harrison, C. Double boost for doxorubicin therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 13, 178 (2014).
Mangraviti, A., Tyler, B. & Brem, H. Interstitial chemotherapy for malignant glioma: Future prospects in the era of multimodal therapy. Surg. Neurol. Int. 6(Suppl 1), S78–S84 (2015).
Campaner, S. & Amati, B. Two sides of the Myc-induced DNA damage response: from tumor suppression to tumor maintenance. Cell Div. 7, 6 (2012).
Kumari, A., Folk, W. P., & Sakamuro, D. The dual roles of MYC in genomic instability and cancer chemoresistance. Genes 8, 158 (2017).
Dang, C. V. MYC, metabolism, cell growth, and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. 3, a014217 (2013).
Makoto Tsuneoka. et al. Mina53 as a potential prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 7347–7356 (2004).
Komiya, K. et al. Mina53, a novel c-Myc target gene, is frequently expressed in lung cancers and exerts oncogenic property in NIH/3T3 cells. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 136, 465–473 (2010).
Brennan, C. W. et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155, 462–477 (2013).
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1302204, 2017YFC1308600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672502), the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program for Chongqing Overseas Returned Scholars (No.cx2017014), and the Chongqing University Innovation Team Building Program funded projects (CXTDX201601010).