Abstract
Myelin-associated proteins such as Nogo-A are major inhibitors of neuronal plasticity that contribute to permanent neurological impairments in the injured CNS. In the present study, we investigated the influence of Nogo-A on visual recovery after retinal injuries in mice. Different doses of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) were injected in the vitreous of the left eye to induce retinal neuron death. The visual function was monitored using the optokinetic response (OKR) as a behavior test, and electroretinogram (ERG) and local field potential (LFP) recordings allowed to assess changes in retinal and cortical neuron activity, respectively. Longitudinal OKR follow-ups revealed reversible visual deficits after injection of NMDA ≤ 1 nmole in the left eye and concomitant functional improvement in the contralateral visual pathway of the right eye that was let intact. Irreversible OKR loss observed with NMDA ≥ 2 nmol was correlated with massive retinal cell death and important ERG response decline. Strikingly, the OKR mediated by injured and intact eye stimulation was markedly improved in Nogo-A KO mice compared with WT animals, suggesting that the inactivation of Nogo-A promotes visual recovery and plasticity. Moreover, OKR improvement was associated with shorter latency of the N2 wave of Nogo-A KO LFPs relative to WT animals. Strikingly, intravitreal injection of anti-Nogo-A antibody (11C7) in the injured eye exerted positive effects on cortical LFPs. This study presents the intrinsic ability of the visual system to recover from NMDA-induced retinal injury and its limitations. Nogo-A neutralization may promote visual recovery in retinal diseases such as glaucoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Retinal degeneration resulting from stroke, diabetic retinopathy, or glaucoma causes irreversible vision loss by inducing neuronal cell death. However, retinal disease models showed that the extent of visual deficits does not always correlate with the level of retinal cell death1,2. Functional impairments in surviving neurons may thus account to a large extent for visual deficits after retinal injury. Moreover, the fact that retinal neurons have a very weak ability to regenerate after injury is likely to participate in the vision deterioration caused by ocular diseases3,4,5. Molecular mechanisms restricting visual neuron plasticity have been described in the injured retina. For example, myelin-associated proteins such as Nogo-A inhibit retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon regeneration after experimental optic nerve injury6. The inhibitory effects of Nogo-A are mediated by Nogo-66 receptor 1 (NgR1)7 and intracellular RhoA activation8,9,10. The same molecular mechanism may alter vision function after partial retinal lesions.
In intact animals, the visual system plasticity becomes very limited after the end of so-called critical period11. For example, the ocular dominance (OD) plasticity in the primary visual cortex (V1) is dramatically reduced after postnatal day 19–32 (P19–32) in mice12. The closure of the critical period in the visual system coincides with the formation of myelin and the upregulation of Nogo-A in deep visual cortex layers13. Strikingly, genetic ablation of Nogo-A/B or its receptors NgR1 and paired Ig-like receptor B (PirB) restore OD plasticity in the visual cortex of mature mice13,14. We observed that the optokinetic reflex (OKR) sensitivity of intact adult Nogo-A knockout (KO) mice was higher than in wild-type (WT) mice15 after monocular deprivation (MD)16, thus pointing at a major role for Nogo-A in the control of experience-driven visual plasticity15. These findings prompted us to test the impact of Nogo-A inactivation on visual recovery after retinal injury in the present study.
Intravitreal injections of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) trigger excitotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner and are therefore suitable to produce various degrees of retinal injuries17,18,19. NMDA-induced excitotoxicity has extensively been used to mimic ischemic-like insults and to study neuronal cell death mechanisms in the rodent retina20,21,22,23,24,25. Surprisingly, the dose-dependent effects of NMDA on the mouse visual system function have not been fully characterized. In the current study, using the model of NMDA-induced excitotoxicity, visual function changes were monitored with the OKR in WT and Nogo-A KO adult mice. Our results revealed the limitations of the visual system to recover from retinal injuries and suggest that neuronal plasticity stimulation with Nogo-A inactivation improves vision after retinal damage 26,27,28.
Results
Dose-dependent effects of NMDA on visual loss and recovery
The optokinetic response (OKR) of adult WT mice was assessed after intravitreal injections of variable concentrations of NMDA into the left eye. Control mice were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Fig. 1a). The spatial frequency thresholds of the two eyes were separately evaluated by changing the direction of grating rotation in the virtual-reality optomotor system (Fig. 1b)29. PBS injection did not alter the OKR (Fig. 1c). The spatial frequency threshold assessed after NMDA delivery allowed to distinguish three patterns of functional changes: (1) at 0.02–0.1 nmol NMDA—weak visual response reduction and quick and complete recovery; (2) at 0.2–1 nmol NMDA—transient visual response abolition followed by delayed recovery; and (3) at 2–10 nmol NMDA—permanent visual response abolition (Fig. 1c). Surprisingly, visual stimulation of the uninjected contralateral (right) eyes showed enhanced spatial frequency threshold following NMDA injection into the left eye, compared with PBS (Fig. 1d). This phenomenon may result from plastic mechanisms operating in visual brain regions15,29. The survival of RGCs was monitored 3 weeks post injection by staining retinal flat-mounts for β3tubulin (Fig. 1a, e, f)19. The examination of β3tubulin-labeled RGCs revealed a 30% reduction in cell density after the injection of 0.02–2 nmol NMDA relative to control eyes left untreated or injected with PBS (Fig. 1e, f). A much larger reduction in cell number was observed at 5 and 10 nmol of NMDA at which the decline of RGCs reached ~60% and ~80%, respectively. These data suggest that NMDA-induced visual deficits are sustained for RGC cell death higher than 30%, whereas the elevation of OKR sensitivity through the intact eye did not correlate with retinal lesion severity.
Endogenous visual recovery after retinal damage
Amacrine and bipolar cells located in the inner nuclear layer (INL) are also sensitive to NMDA-induced excitotoxicity17,30,31,32. To determine how the activity of these cells changed after reversible or irreversible visual deficits (Fig. 1c), electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded 10 days after PBS or NMDA injection (Fig. 2a). Indeed, the a-wave of the ERG is generated by the activation of photoreceptors, whereas the b-wave results from the activity of post-photoreceptor cells in the INL. ERG traces did not show differences in a-wave and b-wave amplitudes for 0.5 nmol of NMDA compared with PBS treatment (Fig. 2a, b). However, the b-wave amplitude was decreased by 33–47% after the injection of 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 2a, b). Histological analysis allowed to observe RGC and amacrine cell death in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and in the INL (Fig. 2c). Retinal sections were stained by immunofluorescence for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), selectively expressed in a subpopulation of amacrine cells (Starburst amacrine cells)33, for calretinin, a cell marker found in amacrine subtypes and RGCs34 and for RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS), a specific marker of RGCs35 (Fig. 2c). After injection of 0.5 nmol of NMDA, the density of cells labeled with RBPMS and calretinin, but not that expressing ChAT, was clearly diminished in the INL and in the GCL. A massive decrease in all labeled cells could be observed at 5 nmol of NMDA. Quantitatively, the number of RBPMS-positive RGCs was reduced by ~30% at 0.5 nmol of NMDA and by ~82% at 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 2d). ChAT-labeled amacrine cells were not affected by 0.5 nmol of NMDA but decreased by ~60–90% with 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 2e). The rate of cells containing calretinin shrank by ~21–25% after 0.5 nmol NMDA injection and by ~84–96% after delivery of 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 2f). Therefore, in contrast to 0.5 nmol of NMDA that has moderate toxic effects, 5 nmol of NMDA leads to marked functional loss and to massive cell death that correlate with irreversible OKR loss.
Nogo-A is not significantly downregulated in retinal glia after reversible injury
The expression of Nogo-A and its receptors was monitored by quantitative real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) after excitotoxicity (Fig. 3a). The level of Nogo-a (Rtn4a) transcripts was only decreased by 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 3a). By western blot analysis however, the level of Nogo-A protein did not change (Fig. 3c). Nevertheless, a weaker immunofluorescent signal for Nogo-A was observed in the superior quadrant of the retina treated with 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 3b) using 11C736. In the intact retina, Nogo-A signal was intense in Müller cell extensions, consistently with our previous observations37,39,40,42. The decreased expression of Nogo-A detected by qRT-PCR coincided with the upregulation of Glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) and Vimentin mRNA (Fig. 3a) and GFAP protein (Fig. 3c), thus excluding the involvement of Nogo-A in Müller cell gliosis37,43. Moreover, the expression of the Nogo-A receptor Ngr1 (Rtn4r) was decreased along with that of the neuronal marker Tubb3 (β3tubulin). In contrast, Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 2 (S1pr1 and S1pr2) are two potential Nogo-A receptors44 whose mRNA levels were upregulated (Fig. 3a). The mRNA elevation of the neuronal growth markers Growth associated protein 43 (Gap43) and Small proline rich protein 1a (Sprr1a) suggest that endogenous mechanisms of neuronal plasticity may be activated in an attempt to restore retinal function. In this context, the decrease in NgR1 mRNA may contribute to retinal cell plasticity and visual recovery (Fig. 3a). Paradoxically, Nogo-a mRNA downregulation only occurred at a significant level when retinal injury was too severe, i.e., after the delivery of 5 nmol of NMDA, to influence functional recovery and did not change the level of Nogo-A protein (Fig. 3b). The limited downregulation of Nogo-A and NgR1 encountered after moderate injury (0.5 nmol NMDA) may not be optimal for promoting rapid and complete vision recovery.
Nogo-A neutralization improves visual recovery and plasticity after retinal injury
The influence of Nogo-A ablation on the OKR was tested after NMDA injections using Nogo-A KO mice. The OKR of Nogo-A KO mice recovered faster from NMDA-induced injury after the administration of 0.05–0.5 nmol of toxin than in WT controls (Fig. 4a). However, with 5 nmol of NMDA no improvement could be observed. Strikingly, the spatial frequency threshold of the intact (right) eye increased to a higher level in Nogo-A KO mice than in WT mice (Fig. 4b), suggesting that Nogo-A ablation induces functional improvement in the healthy structures of the visual system as well. This phenomenon occurred in a stereotyped manner upon injection, irrespectively of the dose of NMDA administered (Fig. 4b, Fig. S1). Interestingly, the quantification of β3tubulin-labeled cells did not reveal differences in RGC survival between WT and KO mice following NMDA injection (Fig. S1). Therefore, Nogo-A deletion promotes visual recovery and functional plasticity without influencing RGC survival.
The electrophysiological response of V1 neurons is modified by Nogo-A inactivation
To examine changes in neuronal activity in the retina and visual brain areas, ERGs and cortical local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded in Nogo-A KO and WT mice (Fig. 5a). The amplitude of the ERG a-wave and b-wave did not significantly differ between the two mouse genotypes with or without NMDA-induced injury, suggesting that the activity of retinal cells, upstream of RGCs, is not modified in the absence of Nogo-A (Fig. 5b, c). We then hypothesized that the visual function improvement induced by Nogo-A deletion may be due to plastic changes in the retinogeniculate pathway and visual brain regions15. Neuronal activity was followed in the monocular area of the primary visual cortex (V1) by recording LFPs evoked by light stimulation in the left eye (Fig. 5d, e, f and Fig. S2A, B). LFP waveforms presented characteristic P1–N1 and P2–N2 components (Fig. 5d)45 that are thought to respectively stem from primary and secondary retinogeniculate responses45,46. In intact animals, only the P2 latency of KO (n = 4 mice) LFPs was significantly lower than in WT mice (n = 6 mice; Fig. 5d, e and Fig. S2A). In NMDA-injected mice, clearer differences appeared: the latencies of P2 and N2 were shorter in Nogo-A KO (n = 8 mice) than in WT (n = 8 mice) animals (Fig. 5d, f). These data suggest that cortical activity changes in V1 may participate in the enhancement of visual recovery in Nogo-A KO mice.
To address the potential role of retinal Nogo-A in cortical neuron activation (Fig. 5d, f), the function-blocking antibody 11C7 (2 μg/eye) or a control IgG was intravitreally injected 2 days after NMDA-induced injury (Fig. 6), a time when the expression of inflammation-associated molecules is strongly reduced (Fig. S3). Indeed, 11C7 is efficient to acutely neutralize Nogo-A in the brain47,48, spinal cord49, and retina50. Strikingly, LFP recordings allowed to observe N2 latency reduction with 11C7 treatment compared with control antibody after injection of 0.5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 6a, b). As 0.5 nmol of NMDA does not alter the ERG waves generated by inner and outer retinal layer cells (Fig. 2a, b), it is plausible that 11C7 modified LFP latencies by influencing RGC function. In contrast, 11C7 had no effect on N2 latency after the administration of 5 nmol of NMDA (Fig. 6a, c). The fact that ERG b-wave (Fig. S4A, B) and RGC survival (Fig. S4C) were similarly affected after delivery of 5 nmol of NMDA and 11C7 or control IgG suggests that 11C7 does not improve the function and survival of retinal cells upstream of RGCs. LFP amplitudes minimally changed after 11C7 treatment (Fig. S2C, D). Collectively, our electrophysiological data reveal that acute blockade of Nogo-A in the eye exerts similar effects on cortical LFPs to those observed in Nogo-A KO mice, presumably by influencing the function of RGCs and their postsynaptic partners.
Discussion
Our data showed that retinal injuries restricted to the GCL allowed spontaneous visual recovery. The ablation of Nogo-A markedly improved the OKR through the intact and injured eyes and modified cortical LFPs after injury. Acute blockade of retinal Nogo-A with a single injection of 11C7 antibody induced LFP changes as well. As a consequence, Nogo-A appears as a potent inhibitor of vision recovery and plasticity after retinal lesion.
The intrinsic recovery properties of the injured mouse visual system
NMDA-induced excitotoxicity in the rodent retina is a classical injury model that has been characterized at the anatomical level. Surprisingly, the functional consequences of NMDA-induced excitotoxicity had not previously been analyzed in detail. Here, compared with other experimental models1,2, the intravitreal injection of NMDA enabled us to precisely control the extent of retinal injury and to generate measurable OKR dysfunction and recovery. In this context, OKR tests allowed to discriminate three distinct visual alteration patterns: (1) weak visual response reduction with quick and complete recovery for NMDA ≤ 0.1 nmol; (2) transient visual response abolition followed by delayed recovery for 0.2–1 nmol NMDA; and (3) permanent visual response abolition for NMDA ≥ 2 nmol. These results provide new insights on the intrinsic ability of the visual system to recover from retinal injury and its limitations. Our data also reveal visual affection at relatively low dose of NMDA. In general, the use of excessive amounts of NMDA (>2 nmol) may not be optimal to assess the potential benefits of new treatments on visual function impairments. Interestingly, in Nogo-A KO mice, a small (~5% of WT values) but consistent increase in OKR sensitivity was measured before injury, in agreement with our previous results15. The difference may result from complex compensatory mechanisms in KO mice but is of modest magnitude when compared with the drastic changes observed between KO and WT mice after NMDA injection.
The involvement of Nogo-A signaling in the inhibition of retinal neuron recovery
The inhibition of neuronal plasticity and repair induced by Nogo-A may take place in different areas of the visual system, i.e., the optic nerve, the retina, and brain targets, where Nogo-A is constitutively abundant43. Nogo-A has been reported to inhibit axonal regeneration in the injured optic nerve of mice6,37 by activating NgR17 and RhoA8 in RGCs. In addition, Nogo-A is highly expressed in the retina by non-myelinating Müller glia37. This specialized kind of glia possesses many cell contacts with neurons and blood vessels53. At this level, in the intact retina, Nogo-A may stabilize the neuronal circuits and the vascular network50. After injury, however, Nogo-A may exert detrimental effects by limiting neuronal plasticity6. In support of this hypothesis, Nogo-A ablation in KO markedly improved OKR recovery. In addition, with a high dose of NMDA (e.g., 5 nmol), the mRNA level of Nogo-a was significantly reduced while that of gliosis markers such as Gfap and Vimentin was upregulated. Therefore, in agreement with our previous results37, Nogo-A is unlikely to contribute to gliosis in our model. In addition, the Nogo-a mRNA decrease observed by qRT-PCR was not correlated with significant protein downregulation by western blotting. This difference may be due to the relatively long half-life of Nogo-A protein. Although Nogo-A protein was locally decreased around the site of NMDA injection (5 nmol, Fig. 3c), this was insufficient to induce recovery. Moreover, selective retinal Nogo-A blockade with 11C7 injection in the eyeball reduced the N2 latency of cortical LFPs in a similar fashion to chronic Nogo-A ablation in KO animals. This change suggests that retinal Nogo-A impairs cortical neuron activation in V1, perhaps by inhibiting the plasticity of RGC projections in brain targets. For example, in non-injured Nogo-A KO mice, histological rearrangements of retinogeniculate projections were observed in the MD paradigm15. LFP recordings did not allow to directly evaluate retinogeniculate dysfunction in our experiments, however. Indeed, although a delay in N1 latency can reflect electrical conductance defects resulting from retinogeniculate projection demyelination or hypomyelination54,55,56, NMDA-induced RGC injury did not produce such changes (Fig. 5d–f)45. Additional anatomical examinations of retinotectal projections may help determine if Nogo-A inactivation promotes retinal projection remodeling in the brain. In general, local inactivation of Nogo-A in the retina, in the lateral geniculate nucleus and in V1 may clarify the role of each structure in visual recovery.
Nogo-A inactivation enhances visual brain plasticity
Our OKR behavior tests and LFP recordings indicate that Nogo-A impedes neuronal activation in brain structures after retinal injury. Previous studies involved Nogo-A in the inhibition of cortical neuron plasticity in different regions of the intact cerebral cortex13,14,57. The visual cortex was shown to participate in MD-induced OKR enhancement in intact Nogo-A KO mice15. Similarly to what has been observed in the motor cortex58, Nogo-A inactivation may facilitate functional synapse formation in V1 pyramidal cells and compensate for retinal damage. A role for Nogo-A in V1 activation is supported by the shorter latency of the P2–N2 component of KO LFPs after NMDA-induced injury. Moreover, Nogo-A KO mice presented a stronger increase in right eye OKR than WT controls upon NMDA injection in the left eye. This phenomenon was independent of the doses of NMDA, including those that weakly affected left eye-driven OKR. Therefore, the intact eye-mediated OKR enhancement cannot simply be viewed as a compensatory mechanism induced by visual deficits in the left eye, contrary to what is observed after MD13,15.
The role of glial vs neuronal Nogo-A on vision recovery and plasticity
Systemic Nogo-A gene ablation in KO mice resulted in visual function improvement after retinal damage. However, Nogo-A deletion in neurons may attenuate visual recovery and plasticity enhancement at the same time. Indeed, neuronal Nogo-A positively contributed to the growth response of injured RGCs after optic nerve injury37. However, the role of neuronal Nogo-A is not clear in the model of NMDA-induced excitotoxicity. Contrary to optic nerve injury, NMDA injection did not increase the level of Nogo-A in RGCs (Fig. 3). This difference may be due to the severity, the type, and the site of injury: optic nerve crush is a complete traumatic injury inflicted at the axonal level, whereas NMDA (e.g., 0.5 nmol) can produce partial injuries by activating excitotoxic mechanisms in RGC bodies. In this later injury mode, visual recovery may involve compensatory fiber sprouting from spared neurons, similarly to what has been described after spinal cord injury59. In the future, the relative contribution of neuronal vs glial Nogo-A should be addressed using conditional KO mouse lines6. The main drawback of targeting Nogo-A-specific exon(s), at least in our hands, is the compensatory upregulation of proteins such as Nogo-B, a spliced variant of Nogo-A, in Nogo-A KO brains6,60. Indeed, Nogo-B expression is strongly increased in many brain regions but not in the retina6,37. A retinal contribution of Nogo-B to visual recovery/plasticity seems therefore unlikely but cannot be excluded. In the Nogo-A KO visual cortex, increased Nogo-B expression is not expected to influence much neuronal plasticity as Nogo-B has a very low affinity for NgR161, a receptor through which Nogo-A inhibits neuronal growth62. Moreover, the deletion of Nogo-A/B or that of NgR1 enhances cortical neuron plasticity in V1 to a similar extent, suggesting that Nogo-A predominantly inhibits V1 neuron plasticity via NgR1 activation13. Alternatively, acute neutralization of Nogo-A with function-blocking antibodies or viral vectors may allow to clarify the effects of glial Nogo-A on the visual system plasticity.
The modulation of neuronal plasticity in ocular disease treatments
Our data prompt us to push forward the notion that neuronal plasticity activation could promote vision recovery in ocular diseases. Our data showed that independently of neuronal survival, deleting Nogo-A increased visual recovery and changed the cortical response to light stimulation. In a similar manner, intravitreal injection of the function-blocking antibody 11C7 was able to modify cortical LFPs. We attribute these effects to functional changes that may occur in surviving RGCs and their postsynaptic neuronal partners in the brain since 0.5 nmol of NMDA did not affect the ERG response generated by inner and outer nuclear layer cells. In fact, anti-Nogo-A antibodies may only be efficient to treat ocular diseases whose deleterious effects are limited to RGCs, such as glaucoma. Further investigations will be needed to establish the effects of 11C7 on mouse vision with behavioral tests such as the OKR. Given the high expression of Nogo-A throughout the visual system, the development of ocular treatments based on Nogo-A inhibition will also require to specify how intravitreal vs intracerebral delivery influences vision.
Conclusion
This study revealed that neutralizing Nogo-A exerts beneficial effects on visual recovery and plasticity after retinal injury. Based on our results, new immunotherapies against Nogo-A may be designed to treat visual disorders.
Materials and methods
Animals
Adult male C57BL/6J Nogo-A KO and age-matched C57BL/6J WT mice60 were used for behavioral and electrophysiological measurements and tissue analysis. Nogo-A KO animals have previously been described60. WT and Nogo-A KO mice originate from two colonies sharing the same C57BL/6J genetic background. Indeed, Nogo-A KO mice were bred with C57BL/6J WT mice for more than 20 generations at the Brain Research Institute of Zurich, Switzerland, so that WT and Nogo-A KO mice used in this study had the same genetic background. C57BL/6J mice treated with antibodies were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, of the Université Laval Animal Welfare Committee and of the Cantonal Veterinary Office in Zurich.
Intraocular injections
To injure the retina, 2 µl of NMDA (0.01–5 mM) were intravitreally injected in the left eye with a 10-μl Hamilton syringe (Syringe 10UL Model 701RN, Fisher Scientific, Toronto, ON, Canada) under general anesthesia with isoflurane. To do this, the needle tip was inserted through the sclera into the dorsal quadrant of the eyeball, next to the limbus. Care was taken not to injure the lens. The needle tip was kept in place for 2–3 min after injection to allow NMDA diffusion in the vitreous, and slowly withdrawn to limit backflow. The site of injection was then sealed with surgical glue (Histoacryl®, Braun). For acute Nogo-A blockade, the same injection procedure was used to deliver 2 µl of 11C7 (1 µg/µl), a function-blocking antibody directed against Nogo-A, 2 days after NMDA injection. 11C7 selectively neutralizes the inhibitory properties of Nogo-A by binding its Δ20 domain36. It has been proven efficient at enhancing long-term potentiation in the hippocampus63 and at increasing neuronal plasticity in the injured brain47,48 and spinal cord49. An antibody recognizing ethyl N-(3,5-dicarboxyphenyl)-P-{N-[5′-(2″,5″-dioxo-1″-pyrrolidinyl) oxy-1′,5′-dioxopentyl]-4- aminophenylmethyl} phosphonamidate was used as a control.
OKR test
The virtual optomotor system (OptoMotry; Cerebral Mechanics, Middlesex, UK) developed by Prusky et al.16,29 was used to evaluate the spatial frequency threshold of the OKR in freely moving mice. In brief, mice were placed on an elevated platform in the middle of an arena surrounded by four computer screens while moving gratings of different spatial frequencies were displayed on the monitors. The reflexive tracking movement of the mouse head in the temporal-to-nasal direction allowed to test the two eyes independently by changing the direction of the visual stimulus15,29.
ERG recording
ERGs were recorded with a Ganzfeld ERG system (Phoenix Research Labs, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as described in our previous study64. Scotopic ERGs were recorded after overnight dark adaptation. Under dim red light, mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (1 mg/kg). Pupils were dilated with a drop of 1% Mydriacyl Tropicamide (Alcon). To prevent corneal desiccation and to establish contact between the cornea and the electrode (gold-plate objective lens), a moisturizing solution of 2.5% hypromellose (Goniosoft, OCuSOFT Inc.) was applied right after the beginning of anesthesia. ERGs (bandwidth: 2–1000 Hz) were obtained in response to increasing flash intensities, ranging from −1.7 to 2.5 log cd s m-2 (interstimulus interval, 20 ms; flash duration, 1 ms; 0.6 log-unit increment). For quantitative analysis, the amplitude of the a-wave was measured from baseline to the most negative trough, whereas that of the b-wave was measured from the trough of the a-wave to the most positive peak of the retinal response65. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey post hoc test (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
LFP recording in the visual cortex
Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (1 mg/kg). In short, animals were placed in a stereotaxic frame and the skin was longitudinally incised to expose the skull. A hole of ~0.5 mm in diameter was drilled in the skull at the stereotaxic coordinates of the monocular primary visual cortex (V1, 3.6 mm caudal to bregma and 2.3 mm lateral) in the right cerebral hemisphere. Bone fragments were removed and exposed brain was covered with a drop of mineral oil to prevent desiccation. A silver ground wire was placed in the muscles below the skull and a tungsten recording electrode was lowered in V1. The left eye was stimulated with light flashes (2.12 Klux, 1 ms, 7 s interstimulus interval) emitted by a light-emitting diode placed at 5 mm from the cornea. Twenty LPF recordings were averaged for each depth starting from the cortical surface up to 600 μm. The signals were amplified (gain ×1000) and band-pass-filtered (10–1000 Hz) using a differential AC amplifier (A-M systems Micro Electrode amplifier model 1800). Signals were digitally converted (Digidata 1440A, Axon Instruments) and analyzed with pClamp 10 (Molecular Device). LFP parameters were analyzed following the description of Creel et al.45. Consequently, the latency and amplitude of N1, P2, and N2 were compared between WT and Nogo-A KO mice on one hand and between 11C7 and control IgG treatment on the other hand.
RGC survival analysis on retinal flat-mounts
RGC survival was estimated 3 weeks after NMDA injection on retinal flat-mounts2,37,66. In brief, flat-mounted retinae were washed with 0.1 M PBS and permeabilized with 100% methanol for 20 min at −20 °C. Retinal flat-mounts were immunofluorescently labeled for β3tubulin, a marker of RGCs. In this aim, retinae were incubated with a rabbit anti-β3tubulin antibody (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, #ab18207) diluted in blocking solution (PBS containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.3% Triton X-100, and 0.05% sodium azide) and then with a secondary anti-rabbit antibody. Images were taken with a Leica SPE-II confocal microscope at ×40. RGCs were counted in regions of 62 500 µm2 at 1 and 1.5 mm from the optic disk in the four retinal quadrants.
Retina processing and immunostaining
Mice were euthanized with an overdose of anesthetics (ketamine 90 mg/kg and xylazine 10 mg/kg) and perfused intracardially with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Eyes were dissected by removing the cornea and the lens from the eyecup. The eyecups were post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C. The tissues were then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose and frozen in OCT compound (Tissue-TEK, Cedarlane, Burlington, ON, Canada) with a 2-methylbutane bath cooled with liquid nitrogen. Retinal sections were cut (14 μm) with a cryostat. Immunohistochemical stainings were performed in a blocking solution (5% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS). Primary antibodies were applied overnight at 4 °C and after PBS washes, sections were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were mounted in Vectashield solution (BioLynx, Brockville, ON, Canada). Primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit anti-RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (1:200, PhosphoSolutions, Aurora, CO, USA, #1830-RBPMS); goat anti-choline acetyltransferase (1:100, Cedarlane, #AB144P); mouse anti-calretinin (1:500, Swant, Marly, Switzerland, #6B3); rabbit anti-GFAP (1:500, Agilent Technologies Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada); mouse anti-Nogo-A (1:200, Novartis); and rabbit anti-β3tubulin (1:1000, Abcam, #ab18207).
Semi-qRT-PCR
After cervical dislocation, retinae were rapidly dissected, placed in eppendorf tubes, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Total retinal RNA was prepared using the RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada), including a DNase treatment to digest residual genomic DNA. For reverse transcription, equal amounts of RNA were transformed by oligo(dT) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Fisher Scientific). Ten nanograms of cDNA were amplified in the Light Cycler 480 thermocycler (Roche Diagnostics Canada, Laval, QC, Canada) with the SYBR Green I Master polymerase ready mix (Roche Diagnostics Canada). The appropriate primer pairs were designed to span intronic sequences or to cover exon–intron boundaries (Table 1). Relative quantification was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method. cDNA levels were normalized to Gapdh as a reference gene, and a control sample (calibrator set to 1) was used to calculate the relative values. Each reaction was done in triplicate, and three to four mice per condition were analyzed.
References
Krempler, K., Schmeer, C. W., Isenmann, S., Witte, O. W. & Lowel, S. Simvastatin improves retinal ganglion cell survival and spatial vision after acute retinal ischemia/reperfusion in mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2606–2618 (2011).
Joly, S., Guzik-Kornacka, A., Schwab, M. E. & Pernet, V. New mouse retinal stroke model reveals direction-selective circuit damage linked to permanent optokinetic response loss. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 4476–4489 (2014).
Van de Velde, S., De Groef, L., Stalmans, I., Moons, L. & Van Hove, I. Towards axonal regeneration and neuroprotection in glaucoma: Rho kinase inhibitors as promising therapeutics. Prog. Neurobiol. 131, 105–119 (2015).
Isenmann, S., Kretz, A. & Cellerino, A. Molecular determinants of retinal ganglion cell development, survival, and regeneration. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 22, 483–543 (2003).
Pernet, V. Nogo-A in the visual system development and in ocular diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 1300–1311 (2017).
Vajda, F. et al. Cell type-specific Nogo-A gene ablation promotes axonal regeneration in the injured adult optic nerve. Cell Death Differ. 22, 323–335 (2015).
Fischer, D., He, Z. & Benowitz, L. I. Counteracting the Nogo receptor enhances optic nerve regeneration if retinal ganglion cells are in an active growth state. J. Neurosci. 24, 1646–1651 (2004).
Fischer, D., Petkova, V., Thanos, S. & Benowitz, L. I. Switching mature retinal ganglion cells to a robust growth state in vivo: gene expression and synergy with RhoA inactivation. J. Neurosci. 24, 8726–8740 (2004).
Dubreuil, C. I., Winton, M. J. & McKerracher, L. Rho activation patterns after spinal cord injury and the role of activated Rho in apoptosis in the central nervous system. J. Cell Biol. 162, 233–243 (2003).
Lehmann, M. et al. Inactivation of Rho signaling pathway promotes CNS axon regeneration. J. Neurosci. 19, 7537–7547 (1999).
Wiesel, T. N. & Hubel, D. H. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 1003–1017 (1963).
Gordon, J. A. & Stryker, M. P. Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. J. Neurosci. 16, 3274–3286 (1996).
McGee, A. W., Yang, Y., Fischer, Q. S., Daw, N. W. & Strittmatter, S. M. Experience-driven plasticity of visual cortex limited by myelin and Nogo receptor. Science 309, 2222–2226 (2005).
Syken, J., Grandpre, T., Kanold, P. O. & Shatz, C. J. PirB restricts ocular-dominance plasticity in visual cortex. Science 313, 1795–1800 (2006).
Guzik-Kornacka, A. et al. Nogo-A deletion increases the plasticity of the optokinetic response and changes retinal projection organization in the adult mouse visual system. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 317–329 (2016).
Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M. & Douglas, R. M. Enhancement of vision by monocular deprivation in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 26, 11554–11561 (2006).
Siliprandi, R. et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced neurotoxicity in the adult rat retina. Vis. Neurosci. 8, 567–573 (1992).
Kikuchi, M., Tenneti, L. & Lipton, S. A. Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in axotomy-induced apoptosis of rat retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 20, 5037–5044 (2000).
Manabe, S. & Lipton, S. A. Divergent NMDA signals leading to proapoptotic and antiapoptotic pathways in the rat retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 385–392 (2003).
Lebrun-Julien, F. et al. ProNGF induces TNFalpha-dependent death of retinal ganglion cells through a p75NTR non-cell-autonomous signaling pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3817–3822 (2010).
Pernet, V., Bourgeois, P. & Di Polo, A. A role for polyamines in retinal ganglion cell excitotoxic death. J. Neurochem. 103, 1481–1490 (2007).
Nakanishi, N. et al. Neuroprotection by the NR3A subunit of the NMDA receptor. J. Neurosci. 29, 5260–5265 (2009).
Seitz, R., Hackl, S., Seibuchner, T., Tamm, E. R. & Ohlmann, A. Norrin mediates neuroprotective effects on retinal ganglion cells via activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and the induction of neuroprotective growth factors in Muller cells. J. Neurosci. 30, 5998–6010 (2010).
Karl, M. O. et al. Stimulation of neural regeneration in the mouse retina. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19508–19513 (2008).
Lipton, S. A. & Rosenberg, P. A. Excitatory amino acids as a final common pathway for neurologic disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 613–622 (1994).
Harada, T. et al. The potential role of glutamate transporters in the pathogenesis of normal tension glaucoma. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 1763–1770 (2007).
Seki, M. & Lipton, S. A. Targeting excitotoxic/free radical signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention in glaucoma. Prog. Brain Res. 173, 495–510 (2008).
Lebrun-Julien, F. et al. Excitotoxic death of retinal neurons in vivo occurs via a non-cell-autonomous mechanism. J. Neurosci. 29, 5536–5545 (2009).
Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M., Beekman, S. & Douglas, R. M. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 4611–4616 (2004).
Lam, T. T., Abler, A. S., Kwong, J. M. & Tso, M. O. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced apoptosis in rat retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 2391–2397 (1999).
Fischer, A. J., Zelinka, C. & Milani-Nejad, N. Reactive retinal microglia, neuronal survival, and the formation of retinal folds and detachments. Glia 63, 313–327 (2015).
Hughes, T. E. Are there ionotropic glutamate receptors on the rod bipolar cell of the mouse retina? Vis. Neurosci. 14, 103–109 (1997).
Voigt, T. Cholinergic amacrine cells in the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 248, 19–35 (1986).
Pasteels, B., Rogers, J., Blachier, F. & Pochet, R. Calbindin and calretinin localization in retina from different species. Vis. Neurosci. 5, 1–16 (1990).
Kwong, J. M., Caprioli, J. & Piri, N. RNA binding protein with multiple splicing: a new marker for retinal ganglion cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 1052–1058 (2010).
Oertle, T. et al. Nogo-A inhibits neurite outgrowth and cell spreading with three discrete regions. J. Neurosci. 23, 5393–5406 (2003).
Pernet, V. et al. Neuronal Nogo-A upregulation does not contribute to ER stress-associated apoptosis but participates in the regenerative response in the axotomized adult retina. Cell Death Differ. 19, 1096–1108 (2012).
Park, K. K. et al. Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science 322, 963–966 (2008).
Leibinger, M., Andreadaki, A., Diekmann, H. & Fischer, D. Neuronal STAT3 activation is essential for CNTF- and inflammatory stimulation-induced CNS axon regeneration. Cell Death Dis. 4, e805 (2013).
Pernet, V. et al. Misguidance and modulation of axonal regeneration by Stat3 and Rho/ROCK signaling in the transparent optic nerve. Cell Death Dis. 4, e734 (2013).
Moore, D. L. et al. KLF family members regulate intrinsic axon regeneration ability. Science 326, 298–301 (2009).
Joly, S., Dodd, D. A., Grewe, B. F. & Pernet, V. Reticulon 4A/Nogo-A influences the distribution of Kir4.1 but is not essential for potassium conductance in retinal Muller glia. Neurosci. Lett. 627, 168–177 (2016).
Pernet, V., Joly, S., Christ, F., Dimou, L. & Schwab, M. E. Nogo-A and myelin-associated glycoprotein differently regulate oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin formation. J. Neurosci. 28, 7435–7444 (2008).
Kempf, A. et al. The sphingolipid receptor S1PR2 is a receptor for Nogo-a repressing synaptic plasticity. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001763 (2014).
Creel, D., Dustman, R. E. & Beck, E. C. Intensity of flash illumination and the visually evoked potential of rats, guinea pigs and cats. Vision Res. 14, 725–729 (1974).
Creel, D. J., Dustman, R. E. & Beck, E. C. Differences in visually evoked responses in albino versus hooded rats. Exp. Neurol. 29, 298–309 (1970).
Tsai, S. Y., Papadopoulos, C. M., Schwab, M. E. & Kartje, G. L. Delayed anti-nogo-a therapy improves function after chronic stroke in adult rats. Stroke 42, 186–190 (2011).
Lindau, N. T. et al. Rewiring of the corticospinal tract in the adult rat after unilateral stroke and anti-Nogo-A therapy. Brain 137(Pt 3), 739–756 ?tlsb?>(2014).
Liebscher, T. et al. Nogo-A antibody improves regeneration and locomotion of spinal cord-injured rats. Ann. Neurol. 58, 706–719 (2005).
Walchli, T. et al. Nogo-A is a negative regulator of CNS angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1943–E1952 (2013).
Nakano, N. et al. Longitudinal and simultaneous imaging of retinal ganglion cells and inner retinal layers in a mouse model of glaucoma induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 8754–8762 (2011).
Kuehn, S. et al. Concentration-dependent inner retina layer damage and optic nerve degeneration in a NMDA model. J. Mol. Neurosci. 63, 283–299 (2017).
Bringmann, A. et al. Muller cells in the healthy and diseased retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res 25, 397–424 (2006).
You, Y., Klistorner, A., Thie, J. & Graham, S. L. Latency delay of visual evoked potential is a real measurement of demyelination in a rat model of optic neuritis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 6911–6918 (2011).
Matsunaga, Y. et al. Visual functional and histopathological correlation in experimental autoimmune optic neuritis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 6964–6971 (2012).
Lehman, D. M. & Harrison, J. M. Flash visual evoked potentials in the hypomyelinated mutant mouse shiverer. Doc. Ophthalmol. 104, 83–95 (2002).
Akbik, F. V., Bhagat, S. M., Patel, P. R., Cafferty, W. B. & Strittmatter, S. M. Anatomical plasticity of adult brain is titrated by Nogo receptor 1. Neuron 77, 859–866 (2013).
Zemmar, A. et al. Neutralization of Nogo-A enhances synaptic plasticity in the rodent motor cortex and improves motor learning in vivo. J. Neurosci. 34, 8685–8698 (2014).
Schwab, M. E. Functions of Nogo proteins and their receptors in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 799–811 (2010).
Simonen, M. et al. Systemic deletion of the myelin-associated outgrowth inhibitor Nogo-A improves regenerative and plastic responses after spinal cord injury. Neuron 38, 201–211 (2003).
Acevedo, L. et al. A new role for Nogo as a regulator of vascular remodeling. Nat. Med. 10, 382–388 (2004).
Fournier, A. E., GrandPre, T. & Strittmatter, S. M. Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature 409, 341–346 (2001).
Kempf, A. et al. Upregulation of axon guidance molecules in the adult central nervous system of Nogo-A knockout mice restricts neuronal growth and regeneration. Eur. J. Neurosci. 38, 3567–3579 (2013).
Joly, S., Lamoureux, S. & Pernet, V. Nonamyloidogenic processing of amyloid beta precursor protein is associated with retinal function improvement in aging male APPswe/PS1DeltaE9 mice. Neurobiol. Aging 53, 181–191 (2017).
Joly, S., Pernet, V., Dorfman, A. L., Chemtob, S. & Lachapelle, P. Light-induced retinopathy: comparing adult and juvenile rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 3202–3212 (2006).
Joly, S., Dalkara, D. & Pernet, V. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 modulates CNTF-induced axonal growth and neuroprotection in the mouse visual system. Neural Plast. 2017, 6818970 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. E. Planel and Dr. S. Proulx for allowing us to use their epifluorescence and confocal microscopes, Dr. M. E. Schwab for providing us with anti-Nogo-A antibodies and Nogo-A KO mice and Dr. S. Hébert for sharing his qRT-PCR machine with us. This work was supported by grants from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS, grant # 30633), the Velux Stiftung (grant # 988), and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI, project # 34204).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by A. Yaron
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mdzomba, J.B., Jordi, N., Rodriguez, L. et al. Nogo-A inactivation improves visual plasticity and recovery after retinal injury. Cell Death Dis 9, 727 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0780-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0780-x
This article is cited by
-
B cell-dependent EAE induces visual deficits in the mouse with similarities to human autoimmune demyelinating diseases
Journal of Neuroinflammation (2022)
-
Nogo-A-targeting antibody promotes visual recovery and inhibits neuroinflammation after retinal injury
Cell Death & Disease (2020)