Gemcitabine (GEM)-induced drug resistance is the major reason for the failure of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer (PC). In this study, we found that Oblongifolin C (OC) efficiently inhibited PC cell proliferation by inducing G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis. Also, our mechanism study demonstrated that OC re-sensitized the GEM-resistant PC cells through the ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of Src, and then downregulating the MAPK pathway. Knockdown of Src plus OC resulted in a greater inhibitory effect in GEM-resistant PC cells. In contrast, Src overexpression reversed OC-mediated chemosensitization, thereby implicating Src in the action of OC. Moreover, our in vivo study showed that OC suppressed the tumor growth via the downregulation of Src, and enhanced the chemosensitivity of GEM-resistant PC to GEM. Overall, our results have revealed that OC is applicable as a promising agent for overcoming GEM-resistant PC, especially with aberrant Src expression.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the most lethal cancer and has a poor prognosis. Gemcitabine (GEM), a cytotoxic nucleoside analog, is the clinical standard chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer (PC). The development of GEM resistance leads to a low response to chemotherapy and remains a significant limitation to its use1. Thus, agents that reverse GEM resistance and improve the chemosensitivity of chemotherapy in PC are needed.
Src, a membrane-associated non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is commonly overexpressed in most late-stage tumor tissues, and is an indicator of poor clinical prognosis2,3,4,5. Thus, Src has been a drug development target, and a number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical evaluation as cancer therapies6,7. Dasatinib, a dual Abl/Src inhibitor, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia8. Recently, a significant amount of data show that aberrant activation of Src contributes to chemotherapy drug resistance in different types of cancers9,10,11. Activated Src kinase is also correlated with colorectal carcinoma cell resistance, and Dasatinib, as an Src inhibitor, could inhibit this protein and restore the sensitivity of liver metastatic colorectal carcinoma to oxaliplatin12.
Natural compounds are the main resources of drug development. The natural polyphenolic compound gallic acid could re-sensitized EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors though the inhibition of Src-Stat3-mediated signaling13. In this study, we have confirmed that Oblongifolin C (OC), a natural product isolated from Garcinia yunnanensis, efficiently inhibits cell proliferation and enhances the sensitivity of GEM-resistant PC in vitro and in vivo through downregulation Src/MAPK/ERK pathways. Our findings suggest that OC is a new promising candidate to overcome GEM resistance in PC with the aberrant expression of Src.
OC inhibits the proliferation of parental and GEM-resistant PC by inducing G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis
Our previous studies have been reported that OC exhibited multiple anticancer properties14,15,16. In this study, we first assessed the viability of five human PC cell lines, MIA PaCa-2, Capan-1, SW1990, PANC-1, and BxPC-3 upon OC treatment. As shown in Table 1, OC efficiently inhibited the proliferation of PC cells. Next, we induced MIA PaCa-2, Capan-1 into MIA-RES and Capan-1-RES via serially increasing the GEM concentrations, respectively. The IC50 values of GEM in the MIA-RES and Capan-1-RES cells increased markedly, which were 184 and more than 44 folds compared with their parental PC cells, respectively (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1A and Table 2). Interestingly, Fig. 1b and supplementary 1B showed that OC still displayed cytotoxic effects against MIA-RES and Capan-1-RES cells with IC50 values of 9.86 ± 0.41 μM and 15.20 ± 0.35 μM, respectively, at 48 h. We then examined the cell cycle distribution and apoptosis using propidium iodide (PI) staining flow cytometric analysis. The results demonstrated that OC accumulated in the G0/G1 phase of MIA PaCa-2 (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1C) and MIA-RES (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1D) cells at 24 h in a dose-dependent manner, with G0/G1 cell numbers increasing significantly from 48.8% at 0 μM OC to 59.2% at 6 μM OC in MIA PaCa-2 and from 48.9% at 0 μM OC to 61.6% at 10 μM OC in MIA-RES, respectively. After treatment with OC for 48 h, a significant increase of Sub-G1 cells from 3.29% to 40.0% was observed in MIA-RES, and a similar effect with less potency was exerted in MIA PaCa-2 cells, with an increase from 1.62% to 28.2%. And the images of indicative cells were photographed by confocal microscopy (Supplementary Fig. 1E).
We then were curious regarding how OC regulated cell cycle-related proteins. We found that OC treatment reduced the protein expression of cyclin D3, cyclin E1, and cyclin A, and CDKs 4 and 6 in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1e and f) in MIA-RES cells, as well as the protein level of p-Rb (Ser807/811) and the tumor suppressor proteins with different members of Rb/p105 and Rb2/p130. In addition, OC decreased the protein level of E2F1, a transcription factor in both MIA-RES and MIA PaCa-2 cells (data not shown). Moreover, OC reduced the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, two anti-apoptotic proteins, and activated the caspase-3 and PARP protein levels in PC cells.
OC inhibits Src/MAPK/ERK signaling in MIA-RES cells
It has been reported that the aberrant activation of Src contributes to chemotherapy drug resistance in different types of cancers9,10,11. To investigate whether the abnormal expression of Src involves in GEM-resistant PC cells, we compared the protein expressions of Src tyrosine kinases and its downstream mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) between MIA PaCa-2 and MIA-RES cells. Src activation is required the autophosphorylation site of Tyr416, and negatively regulated through phosphorylation of tyrosine 530 (avian Tyr527). Figure 2a shows that Src activity is highly expressed and constitutively activated in MIA-RES cells with the overexpression of Src tyrosine 416 phosphorylation and the faint band of phosphorylated Tyr527, compared with the parental MIA PaCa-2 cells. Consistently, its downstream MAPK signaling pathway was also activated. Next, we examine the consequences of Src/MAPK signaling after OC treatment in both cell lines. As shown in Fig. 2b, the Src/MAPK/ERK phosphorylation levels and AKT activity were remarkably decreased in MIA-RES cells after treatment with 10 μM OC, with or without 40 μM GEM for 48 h. Although treatment with lower doses of OC and GEM were less effective. In addition, OC could not modulate the parental MIA PaCa-2 cells through downregulation Src/MAPK pathways. In addition, Figs. 2c and 2d showed that OC inactivated the Src protein by phosphorylation of the negative regulatory tyrosine 527 and downregulation the expression of p-Src Tyr416. Meantime, OC inhibited the MAPKs and AKT activity in a time- and dose-dependent manner. These findings suggested that OC re-sensitized MIA-RES cells to GEM by downregulating Src/MAPK and AKT pathways. To elucidate the possible mechanism of OC against Src signal, immunofluorescence staining was applied to observe the translocation of Src in MIA-RES cells. As shown in Fig. 2e, Src was dissociated from the membrane into the cytoplasm upon of 4 μM OC treatment for 12 h, suggesting that OC might act on the Src localization and was followed with the inhibition of Src. In addition, the transcription of Src was determined by qRT-PCR and Fig. 2f, which showed that the mRNA levels of Src did not decrease following OC treatment, suggesting that OC does not directly influence the transcription of Src.
Knockdown of Src plus OC enhances the chemosensitivity to GEM in GEM-resistant human PC cells
Considering the high expression levels of Src and its downstream MAPKs in GEM-resistant PC cells, we hypothesized that abnormal expression of Src was responsible for chemoresistance. To verify this hypothesis, Src-specific siRNA was used to knockdown Src in GEM-resistant PC cells and its parental cells. As shown in Fig. 3a and supplementary Figure 2A, a pool of c-Src siRNAs, which include 4 target-specific 19–25 nt siRNAs, exhibited strong Src knockdown efficacies in both the mRNA expression and protein levels. Src activity was severely suppressed, with the autophosphorylated tyrosine 416 site downregulated in both Src-silencing cells. As predicated, the knockdown of the endogenous expression of Src significantly mediated the sensitization to cell death in MIA-RES cells when treated with OC or GEM (Fig. 3b). In Src knockdown cells, 40 μM GEM treatment decreased the MIA-RES cell viability to 41.8%, which is a nearly 20% reduction compared to the non-silenced cells (61.8%). Interestingly, treatment with 10 μM OC in Src knockdown cells showed almost the same effects as 40 μM GEM, the cell viability decreased from 66.5% in mock cells to 49.4% when treated with 10 μM OC, whereas, co-treatment with 6 μM of OC and 40 μM GEM showed slight synergetic effects. Compared with MIA-RES cells, the parental MIA PaCa-2 cells showed a slightly inhibitory effect when treated with OC in Src-silencing cells (Fig. 3c). And similar results were obtained in Capan-1-RES and Capan-1 cells, which are shown in Supplementary Figure 2C and 2D. To understand the mechanism underlying the enhanced antitumor effect of OC following the Src knockdown, we first assessed the mRNA level of Src. As shown in Figs. 3d and 3e, Src mRNA was slightly affected by OC treatment before and after silencing Src expression. Second, we also examined the activities of MAPKs in the indicated cells before and after OC treatment. It is due to that Src is associated with the promotion of MAPK-dependent cell proliferation and apoptosis17,18. Knockdown of the expression of Src significantly attenuated the activity of Src, with the decrease level of its autophosphorylated tyrosine 416 site, and also the expression of its downstream in MIA-RES cells. In addition, treatment of OC after silencing Src expression resulted in a greater inhibitory effect, with the expression of Src/MEK/ERK barely detectable (Fig. 3f). While comparing the protein expression of negative control and its Src-silenced MIA PaCa-2 cells, OC treatment had a minimal effect on the downstream protein of Src, which is insufficient to sensitize cells to death (Fig. 3g). Knockdown of Src had little effect on parental MIA PaCa-2 cells, one possibility is that the low basal expression of Src, and Src/MAPK pathways is not the major survival signaling.
Taken together, our data indicated that OC efficiently sensitized GEM-resistant PC cell death via downregulating Src expression, and it exhibited better effects after depleting Src expression in PC cells.
Overexpression of Src reverts the effect of OC and enhances the chemoresistant of PC cells
To further verify the effect of OC on Src kinase, we overexpressed Src to examine whether the effect of OC still existed. The transfection efficiencies of Src were shown in Fig. 4a and supplementary Figure 2B. Transfection of Src plasmid obviously increased the levels of mRNA expression and protein expression in PC cells. As showed in Figs. 4b, 4c and Supplementary 2E, 2 F, neither the Src plasmid nor the empty expression vector alone significantly altered the observed cellular viability. Whereas, overexpression of Src increased chemoresistant to GEM both in parental and GEM-resistant PC cells. To a certain extent, Src overexpression also reverted the effect of OC, or their combination. These results suggested that Src overexpression led to a low response of GEM in PC and reversed OC-mediated chemosensitization. In addition, OC not only downregulate the ectopic protein expression of Src but also the mRNA level when transfection with exogenous Src plasmids into the two indicated cell lines (Figs. 4d and 4e). Figure 4f shows that Src overexpression activated MAPKs, and OC could partially block Src activity and MAPK signaling pathways, whereas OC exhibited little effect on MIA PaCa-2 cells (Fig. 4g). These findings suggest that OC-induced downregulation of Src have a critical role in inducing cell death of GEM-resistant PC cells.
OC promotes Src protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway
As OC sensitized the MIA-RES cells through the downregulation of Src expression, we further explored the mechanism that how OC regulated Src in PC cells. First, we examined the overall ubiquitination status upon OC treatment. Figures 5a and 5b showed that the ubiquitination level was increased upon OC treatment in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Several studies demonstrated that the active form of Src is required in a process of ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of Src19,20. Then, we exposed MIA-RES cells to the synthesis inhibitor by cycloheximide to investigate Src stability. The combined treatment of cycloheximide (CHX) with OC dramatically reduced protein stability of Src, with the active form of autophosphorylation tyrosine 416 site in predominant (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, we used MG132 to inhibit 26 s proteasome activity in MIA-RES cells. We found that the Src expression was enriched by OC treatment for 6 h, suggesting that Src protein is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (Fig. 5d). We then performed immunoprecipitation to examine the directly effect of OC on Src ubiquitination. We overexpressed his-tagged Src in HEK293T cells and observed the ubiquitination level of Src upon OC treatment. As shown in Fig. 5e, OC increased the ubiquitination level of Src at 24 h.
OC suppresses orthotopic pancreatic tumor growth and improves the chemosensitivity of GEM in vivo
To verify the inhibitory effect of OC in parental and GEM-resistant PC in vivo, we established two orthotopic mouse models using MIA PACA-2 and MIA-RES cells, respectively. No significant differences in body weights between the vehicle and OC treatment groups were observed, whereas the mice in GEM group were slightly decreased after day 23 (Fig. 6a). In the orthotopic animal models of parental PC cells, intraperitoneal administration of 20 mg/kg OC twice a day showed a similar effect as GEM, with a remarkable reduction of the xenograft tumor weight and tumor volume compared with the control mice (Figs. 6b, 6c and Supplementary Fig. 3A). In addition, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that OC reduced the number of proliferating Ki-67-positive cells and induced cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 3C).
To verify whether OC could enhance the chemosensitivity of GEM in GEM-resistant PC in vivo, orthotopic MIA-RES xenograft-bearing mice were divided into four groups: control, OC, GEM, and OC + GEM. Mice treated with GEM exhibited a tendency toward resistance effects, while OC + GEM exhibited better inhibitory effects on tumor growth than single drug treatment (Figs. 6f, 6g and Supplementary Fig. 3B) with no obvious changes of body weight of the animals (Fig. 6e). Consistent with the immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 6h and Supplementary Fig. 3D), OC activated apoptosis in OC treatment tumor tissue, and the lowest cell proliferation rate (Ki-67-positive cells) were appeared in the combination group. Also, we confirmed that OC treatment result in a similarly downregulation of Src expression in vivo, with the Src-positive cells in the OC treatment group decreased from 62.6% to 46.9%, and a significant reduce (4.9%) in combination group (p < 0.001).
Taken together, our results suggest that OC exert inhibitory effects on pancreatic tumor growth in vivo and improve the sensitivity of GEM through downregulating Src expression.
Several publications mentioned that the natural products isolated from Garcinia species have been used for chemosensitizers in different types of cancer. α-Mangostin, a natural xanthone derived from Garcinia mangostana L, selectively inhibited ABCG2-mediated drug transport and reversed MDR in ABCG2-overexpressing MDR cancer cells21. Li F et al. showed that Garcinol, a natural polyisoprenylated benzophenone derivative (PPAP), chemosensitized head and neck squamous cell carcinoma b negatively regulating constitutive cisplatin-induced nuclear factor-kB activation and the expression of oncogenic gene product22.
Src, a membrane-associated non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is constitutively active in pancreatic carcinoma tissue23. More than 70% of oncogenes code for tyrosine kinases, so the inactivation of tyrosine kinases is a rational approach for PC therapy24,25. Previous studies also reported that Src kinase overactivity represents a chemoresistance mechanism and Src inhibition reverts chemoresistance in many cancer cells26,27,28. For these reasons, our study aims to focus on the Src inhibitor not only as an antitumor agent but also the potential ability to overcome the chemoresistance of acquired resistance PC.
In our study, we first demonstrated that OC, a natural PPAP, exhibited a reversal effect on GEM-resistant PC through downregulating Src protein via ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. While the transition of Src inhibitors to the clinic was limited by its toxicity, which was also mentioned in Johnson’s publication29. In contrast, our study showed great growth inhibitory effects of OC in GEM-resistant PC without obvious side effects in nude mice. These results indicated that OC is a potential Src inhibitor in GEM-resistant PC.
In summary, our present study elucidated for the first time that OC represented an alternative therapy to overcome GEM-resistant PC growth by interfering with cellular tyrosine kinase Src both in vitro and in vivo.
Material and Methods
Cell cultures and development of GEM-resistant PC cells
Human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines MIA PaCa-2, PANC-1, and BxPC-3, Capan-1, SW1990 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. All the cell culture protocols and the development of MIA PaCa-2, Capan-1 into GEM-resistant MIA-RES and Capan-1-RES cells were followed as described previously30.
Cell viability assay
The cells were exposed to OC or GEM treatment for 48 h 1 day after seeding in 96-well plates. Cell viability was measured using the Cell Counting Kit (CCK8) (Yeasen, China), and the absorbance was measured at 470 nm using a microplate reader (FLUOstar Omega, BMG Labtech, Germany). The IC50 values were calculated from dose–response curves using GraphPad Prism 5 (La Jolla, California, USA).
Propidium iodide staining for flow cytometry
MIA PaCa-2 (3 × 105) and MIA-RES (4 × 105) cells were plated in a 60-mm2 culture plate and maintained with OC with associated concentrations. After 24 and 48 h, the cells were collected and fixed with 70% ethanol in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C. Then, the cells were resuspended with PBS, containing 100 μg/mL RNase (Sigma, R6513) and 20 µg/mL PI (Sigma, P4170), and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Finally, the cells were determined using a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (version VX).
Western blotting assay
c-Src siRNA (sc-29228; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and negative control siRNA (sc-37007) were transfected with Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagents (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The oligonucleotide sequences were listed in Supplementary Table 2.
The Src plasmid was cloned into the XhoI and KpnI restriction site of the GV219 vector (Genechem, Shanghai, China) and 2 μg of plasmid was transfected for 24 h using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life technologies), as instructed by the manufacturer.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR
MIA-RES cells were allowed to adhere overnight and exposure to 4 μM OC for 12 h. Then, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS, blocked with 10% BSA in PBS and incubated with anti-Src antibodies (1:50; CST#2109), followed by Cy3-labeled secondary antibody (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Images were visualized using an inverted fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Measurement of Src protein stability and ubiquitination
MIA-RES cells were co-treated with 10 μM OC with 50 μM CHX. After treatment for a given time, the cells were harvested for the western blot analysis of the Src protein level. For analysis of Src ubiquitination, HEK 293 T cells were transfected with his-tagged Src vectors. One day later, the cells were treated with 10 µM OC for 24 h, and treated with 15 µM MG123 for 6 h before harvest. His-tagged Src was purified with Ni-NTA Agarose beads according to the manufacturers’ protocols (Qiagen). The ubiquitination levels and the amount of Src-his-tagged protein in the immunoprecipitation product were detected by western blotting.
Orthotopic tumor implantation in nude mice
Five-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China) and kept in a pathogen-free environment. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the national guideline as described previously33. For the parental GEM-sensitive cellular orthotopic implantation, 1 × 106 MIA PaCa-2 cells were injected into the pancreatic tail of each mouse. The mice were randomly divided into three groups (6 mice per group) for intraperitoneal treatment for 4 weeks with either vehicle control (0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 0.5% Tween 80) (Group 1); OC, 20 mg/kg every 2 days (Group 2); or GEM, 20 mg/kg twice a week (Group 3).
For the GEM-resistant cellular orthotopic implantation, 1 × 106 MIA-RES cells were injected into the pancreas of each mice. Twenty-four mice were divided into four groups as follows for intraperitoneal treatment: vehicle control (0.5% DMSO, 0.5% Tween 80) (Group 1); OC, 10 mg/kg every day (Group 2); GEM, 20 mg/kg twice a week (Group 3), combination OC 10 mg/kg every day and GEM 20 mg/kg twice a week (Group 4), begun 1 week after tumor implantation (day 1).
A few weeks later, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumor tissues were removed and subjected to immunohistochemical analysis. Tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: (length × width × height) × π / 6.
Tumors were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered paraformaldehyde. Next, the samples were embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, cleaved caspase-3 (ab9664), Src (CST, 2109), p-Src Y418 (ab4816), and Ki-67 (EPITMICS, 2642-1). Finally, the sections were mounted with DPX Mountant (Sigma, 317616) for histological analysis.
The statistical software SPSS version 15.0 was used for the statistical analysis. Student’s t-test was used for comparison between the two different groups, and ANOVA analysis was used for the multiple comparisons. All p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical significance was indicated (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), and all tests were two-tailed.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC81773951).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.