Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • General
  • Published:

Current technology in endodontic instrumentation: advances in metallurgy and manufacture

British Dental Journal volume 231, pages 49–57 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Since the introduction of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments, there have been a myriad of developments which can be confusing and sometimes contradictory. This article seeks to review and articulate these advances, and allow the reader to better understand the benefits and the limitations of the systems available. Ultimately, this helps clinicians to engage more confidently with trade and have a more informed choice of the most appropriate file to use for each individual endodontic case. All this should facilitate more predictable endodontic outcomes.

Key points

  • GDPs have a myriad of nickel-titanium instruments available to them, and instrument selection may be complex and confusing.

  • GDPs can engage more confidently with trade and have a more informed instrument choice when understanding the benefits and limitations of the available choices.

  • GDPs can help to facilitate more predictable endodontic outcomes with appropriate instrument selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walia H, Brantley W A, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14: 346-351.

  2. Thompson S A. An Overview of Nickel-titanium Alloys Used in Dentistry. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 297-310.

  3. Walia H M, Brantley W A, Gerstein H. An Initial Investigation of the Bending and Torsional Properties of Nitinol Root Canal Files. J Endod 1988; 14: 346-351.

  4. Sattapan B, Nervo G J, Palamara J E, Messer H H. Defects in Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files After Clinical Use. J Endod 2000; 26: 161-165.

  5. Miyazaki S, Ohmi Y, Otsuka K, Suzuki Y. Characteristics of deformation and transformation pseudo elasticity in Ti-Ni alloys. J Phys (Paris) 1982; 43 Suppl 12: 255-260.

  6. Miyazaki S, Otsuka K. Deformation and transition behavior associated with the R-phase in Ti-Ni alloys. Metallurg Transact A 1986; 17: 53-63.

  7. Kim H C, Yum J, Hur B, Cheung G S. Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Characteristics of Ground and Twisted Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. J Endod 2010; 36: 147-152.

  8. Ha J-H, Kim S K, Cohenca N, Kim H-C. Effect of R-phase Heat Treatment on Torsional Resistance and Cyclic Fatigue Fracture. J Endod 2013; 39: 389-393.

  9. Berendt C J. Method of preparing nitinol for use in manufacturing instruments with improved fatigue resistance. United States Patent Application 20070072147. US: United States Patent & Trademark Office, 2007.

  10. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008; 34: 1406-1409.

  11. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of Structure on Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments Failure. J Endod 2001; 27: 516-520.

  12. Bui T B, Mitchell J C, Baumgartner J C. Effect of electropolishing ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and cutting efficiency. J Endod 2008; 34: 190-193.

  13. Bonaccorso A, Schäfer E, Condorelli G G, Cantatore G, Tripi T R. Chemical analysis of nickel-titanium rotary instruments with and without electropolishing after cleaning procedures with sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2008; 34: 1391-1395.

  14. Anderson M E, Price J W, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2007; 33: 1212-1216.

  15. Viana A C D, de Melo M C C, de Azevedo Bahia M G, Lopes Buono V T. Relationship between flexibility and physical, chemical, and geometric characteristics of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 527-533.

  16. Larsen C M, Watanabe I, Glickman G N, He J. Cyclic Fatigue Analysis of a New Generation of Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments. J Endod 2009; 35: 401-403.

  17. Gambarini G, Grande N M, Plotino G et al. Fatigue Resistance of Engine-driven Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments Produced by New Manufacturing Methods. J Endod 2008; 34: 1003-1005.

  18. Gambarini G, Gerosa R, De Luca M, Garala M, Testarelli L. Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 798-800.

  19. Hashem A A R, Ghoneim A G, Lutfy R A, Foda M Y, Omar G A F. Geometric Analysis of Root Canals Prepared by Four Rotary NiTi Shaping Systems. J Endod 2012; 38: 996-1000.

  20. Wycoff R C,Berzins D W. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress properties of three different rotary nickel-titanium files with a similar cross-sectional design. J Endod 2012; vol. 38: 1118-1120.

  21. Gavini G, Santos M, Caldeira C et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res 2018; DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0067.

  22. Liu Y, Chen X, Mc Cormick P G. Effect of low temperature ageing on the transformation behavior of near-equiatomic NiTi. J Mater Sci 1997; 32: 5979-5984.

  23. Zinelis S, Eliades T, Eliades G. A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni-Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 125-134.

  24. Pinheiro S R, Alcalde M P, Vivacqua-Gomes N. Evaluation of Apical Transportation and Centring Ability of Five Thermally Treated NiTi Rotary Systems. Int Endod J 2018; 51: 705-713.

  25. Zhou H M, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng Y F, Haapasalo M. Mechanical properties of controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium wires used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012; 38: 1535-1540.

  26. Saber S E D M, Nagy M M, Schäfer E. Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, IRaC E and Hyflex CM Rotary NiTi Files in Severely Curved Root Canals. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 131-136.

  27. Shen Y, Qian W, Abtin H, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. Fatigue Testing of Controlled Memory Wire Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments. J Endod 2011; 37: 997-1001.

  28. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S et al. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J Endod 2016; 42: 156-159.

  29. Iacono F, Pirani C, Generali L et al. Structural analysis of HyFlex EDM instruments. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 303-313.

  30. Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2017; 43: 805-809.

  31. Plotino G, Grande N M, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2014; 40: 1451-1453.

  32. Gao Y, Gutmann J L, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2012; 38: 398-401.

  33. Silva E J N L, Vieira V T L, Belladonna F G et al. Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of XP-endo Shaper and TRUShape instruments. J Endod 2018; 44: 168-172.

  34. Yared G. Canal Preparation Using Only One Ni-Ti Rotary Instrument: Preliminary Observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 339-344.

  35. Pedullà E, Grande N M, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of Continuous or Reciprocating Motion on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of 4 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments. J Endod 2013; 39: 258-261.

  36. Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2013; 47: 405-409.

  37. Siddique R. Effectiveness of Rotary and Reciprocating Systems on Microbial Reduction: A Systematic Review. J Conserv Dent 2019; 22: 114-122.

  38. Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab-Chirani R, Naaman A. Effects of Three Nickel Titanium Instrument Systems on Root Canal Geometry Assessed by Micro-computed Tomography. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 162-170.

  39. Bürklein S, Mathey D, Schäfer E. Shaping Ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe Nickel-titanium Instruments in Severely Curved Root Canals. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 774-781.

  40. Gülşah G, Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Yılmaz K. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of 2Shape, Twisted File and EndoSequence Xpress Nickel-titanium Rotary Files at Intracanal Temperature. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018; 12: 283-287.

  41. Singh S, Mirdha N, Shilpa P H, Tiwari R V C, Abdul M S M, Sainudeen S. Shaping Ability of 2Shape and WaveOne Gold Files Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019; 9: 245-249.

  42. Özyürek T, Gündoğa M, Uslu G et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistances of Hyflex E D M, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue and 2shape NiTi Rotary Files in Different Artificial Canals. Odontology 2018; 106: 408-413.

  43. Ceyhanli K T, Kamaci A, Taner M, Erdilek N, Celik D. Shaping Ability of Two M-wire and Two Traditional Nickel-titanium Instrumentation Systems in S-shaped Resin Canals. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18: 713-717.

  44. Bortoluzzi E A, Carlon D, Meghil M M et al. Efficacy of 3D Conforming Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments in Eliminating Canal Wall Bacteria from Oval-shaped Root Canals. J Dent 2015; 43: 597-604.

  45. Uygun A D, Kol E, Topcu M K C, Seckin F, Ersoy I, Tanriver M. Variations in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal Instruments at Different Levels. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 494-499.

  46. Topçuoğlu H S, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 713-717.

  47. Metzger Z. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evidence-based update. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17: 401-419.

  48. Versiani M A, Pécora J D, De Sousa-Neto M D. Flat-Oval Root Canal Preparation with Self-Adjusting File Instrument: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. J Endod 2011; 37: 1002-1007.

  49. American Assocation of Endodontists. Glossary of Endodontic Terms. 7th ed. Chicago: AAE, 2013.

  50. Glossen C R, Haller R H, Dove S B, del Rio C E. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995; 21: 146-151.

  51. Wever D J, Veldhuizen A G, Sanders M M, Schakenraad J M, van Horn J R. Cytotoxic, Allergic and Genotoxic Activity of a Nickel-titanium Alloy. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1115-1120.

  52. Fili P, Lausmaa J, Musialek J, Mazanec K. Structure and Surface of TiNi Human Implants. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 2131-2138.

  53. Fadlallah S A, El-Bagoury N, Gad El-Rab S M F, Ahmed R A, El-Ousamii G. An Overview of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy: Corrosion Resistance and Antibacterial Inhibition for Dental Application. J Alloys Compd 2014; 583: 455-464.

  54. Department of Health. Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices. 2013. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/170689/HTM_01-05_2013.pdf (accessed May 2020).

  55. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal Microcrack Formation during Root Canal Preparations by Different NiTi Rotary Instruments and the Self-Adjusting File. J Endod 2012; 38: 232-235.

  56. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of Reciprocating File Motion on Microcrack Formation in Root Canals: An SEM Study. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 622-627.

  57. Lopes H P, Moreira E J L, Elias C N, De Almeida R A, Schultz Neves M. Cyclic Fatigue of Protaper Instruments. J Endod 2007; 33: 55-57.

  58. Pruett J P, Clement D J, Carnes D L. Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Nickel-titanium Endodontic Instruments. J Endod 1997; 23: 77-85.

  59. Gambarini G. Cyclic Fatigue of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments after Clinical Use with Low-and High-Torque Endodontic Motors. J Endod 2001; 27: 772-774.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sheffield, Academic Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK

    Faith Campbell

  2. University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Higher Cambridge Street, Coupland 3, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    Joanne Cunliffe

  3. University of Manchester Dental Hospital, Restorative Dentistry, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    James Darcey

Authors
  1. Faith Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanne Cunliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Darcey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faith Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, F., Cunliffe, J. & Darcey, J. Current technology in endodontic instrumentation: advances in metallurgy and manufacture. Br Dent J 231, 49–57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3170-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3170-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links