Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical
  • Published:

Biomechanical planning for minimally invasive indirect restorations

British Dental Journal volume 229, pages 425–429 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper explores the planning and execution of indirect partial-coverage restorations and will outline practical recommendations for maximising the outcomes for minimally invasive (MI) approaches to indirect restorations, with a special focus on vital teeth, endodontically-treated teeth and worn dentitions. Throughout the paper, the supporting evidence for each rationale for partial-coverage restorations will be considered, as well as the risks and benefits of adopting an MI approach to indirect restorations.

Key points

  • Partial coverage indirect restorations are less commonly prescribed by dental practitioners compared to full-coverage crowns.

  • Improvements in material science and digital technologies are opening increased possibilities for aesthetic adhesive partial-coverage indirect restorations.

  • This article highlights recent developments in the evidence base for these restorations as well as an algorithm supporting decision-making in fixed prosthodontics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwendicke F, Frencken J E, Bjørndal L et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res 2016; 28: 58-67.

  2. Schwendicke F, Splieth C, Breschi L et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 3691-3703.

  3. Zöchbauer H. Number of dental restorations worldwide. Market Research Ivoclar Vivadent. 2011.

  4. Christensen G J. The case for onlays versus tooth-coloured crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 2012; 143: 1141-1144.

  5. Jum'ah A, Creanor S, Wilson N, Burke F, Brunton P. Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics. Br Dent J 2019; 226: 192.

  6. Austin R S, Chan M. Digital Restoration Design based on Biologic Principles. In Rekow E D (ed) Digital dentistry: a comprehensive reference and preview of the future. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 2018.

  7. Kelleher M, Bomfim D, Austin R. Biologically Based Restorative Management of Tooth Wear. Int J Dent 2012; DOI: 10.1155/2012/742509.

  8. Doherty R. Pascal Magne: 'It should not be about aesthetics but tooth-conserving dentistry'. Br Dent J 2012; 213: 189.

  9. Richards D. Evidence-based dentistry. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2019.

  10. Edelhoff D, Sorensen J A. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 503-509.

  11. Afrashtehfar K I, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.003.

  12. Afrashtehfar K I, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: A systematic review. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 951-966.

  13. Pjetursson B E, Sailer I, Makarov N A, Zwahlen M, Thoma D S. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 624-639.

  14. Jung R E, Zembic A, Pjetursson B E, Zwahlen M, Thoma D S. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 2-21.

  15. Ng Y L, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 171-189.

  16. Nixdorf D R, Moana-Filho E J, Law A S, McGuire L A, Hodges J S, John M T. Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 224-230.

  17. Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod 2009; 35: 930-937.

  18. Teughels W, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 134-145.

  19. Ng Y L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 6-31.

  20. Ng Y L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 921-939.

  21. Afrashtehfar K I, Tamimi F. An online tool that provides access to evidence-based literature on dental restorations: www.crownorfill.com. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 696-697.

  22. Collares K, Corrêa M B, Laske M et al. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 687-694.

  23. Schwass D R, Lyons K M, Purton D G. How long will it last? The expected longevity of prosthodontic and restorative treatment. NZ Dent J 2013; 109: 98-105.

  24. Olley R C, Andiappan M, Frost P M. An up to 50-year follow-up of crown and veneer survival in a dental practice. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 935-941.

  25. Walton T R. The up to 25-year survival and clinical performance of 2,340 high gold-based metal-ceramic single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 151-160.

  26. Shillingburg H T, Hobo S, Whitsett L D, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1997.

  27. Edelhoff D, Stimmelmayr M, Schweiger J, Ahlers M O, Güth J-F. Advances in materials and concepts in fixed prosthodontics: a selection of possible treatment modalities. Br Dent J 2019; 226: 739-748.

  28. Christensen G J. Clinicians Report. 2018. Available at (accessed September 2020).

  29. 3M. Notice: Change in Indication - Lava Ultimate Restorative. 2015. Available at https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1198023O/lava-ultimate-restorative-change-of-indication-notice.pdf (accessed September 2020).

  30. Shembish F A, Tong H, Kaizer M et al. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 499-509.

  31. Ray H, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 12-18.

  32. Al-Nuaimi N, Patel S, Austin R S, Mannocci F. A prospective study assessing the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the outcome of root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 1143-1157.

  33. Lin C-L, Chang Y-H, Liu P-R. Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: a finite element study. J Dent 2008; 36: 194-203.

  34. Şişmanoğlu S. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of Direct Restorative Approach. Aurum J Health Sci 2019; 2: 21-40.

  35. Krifka S, Anthofer T, Fritzsch M, Hiller K, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 32-42.

  36. Loomans B, Opdam N, Attin T et al. Severe Tooth Wear: European Consensus Statement on Management Guidelines. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 111-119.

  37. Varma S, Preiskel A, Bartlett D. The management of tooth wear with crowns and indirect restorations. Br Dent J 2018; 224: 343.

  38. Loomans B, Kreulen C, Huijs-Visser H et al. Clinical performance of full rehabilitations with direct composite in severe tooth wear patients: 3.5 Years results. J Dent 2018; 70: 97-103.

  39. Mesko M E, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci M S, Opdam N J, Loomans B, Pereira-Cenci T. Rehabilitation of severely worn teeth: A systematic review. J Dent 2016; 48: 9-15.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Restorative Dentistry, UCLH Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, 47–49 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6DG, UK

    Deborah I. Bomfim

  2. Guy’s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Noushad M. Rahim

  3. King’s College London, Prosthodontics, Guy’s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Rupert S. Austin

Authors
  1. Deborah I. Bomfim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noushad M. Rahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rupert S. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupert S. Austin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bomfim, D., Rahim, N. & Austin, R. Biomechanical planning for minimally invasive indirect restorations. Br Dent J 229, 425–429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2170-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2170-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links